Feasibility and first results of the 'Trials-within-Cohorts' (TwiCs) design in patients undergoing radiotherapy for lung cancer.

Background: 'Trials-within-Cohorts' (TwiCs), previously known as 'cohort multiple randomized controlled trials' is a pragmatic trial design, supporting an efficient and representative recruitment of patients for (future) trials. To our knowledge, the 'COhort for Lung cancer Outcome Reporting and trial inclusion' (COLOR) is the first TwiCs in lung cancer patients. In this study we aimed to assess the feasibility and first year results of COLOR.Material and Methods: All patients diagnosed with lung cancer referred to the Radiotherapy department were eligible to participate in the ongoing prospective COLOR study. At inclusion, written informed consent was requested for use of patient data, participation in patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and willingness to participate in (future) trials. Feasibility was studied by assessing participation and comparing baseline PROs to EORTC reference values. First-year results of PROs at baseline and 3 months after inclusion were evaluated separately for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and conventional radiotherapy patients.Results: Of the 338 eligible patients between July 2020 and July 2021, 169 (50%) participated. Among these, 127 (75%) gave informed consent to PROs participation and 110 (65%) were willing to participate in (future) trials. The inclusion percentage dropped from 77% to 33% when the information procedure was switched from in-person to by phone (due to COVID-19 pandemic measures). Baseline PROs for physical and cognitive functioning were comparable in COLOR patients compared to the EORTC reference values. No significant changes in PROs were observed 3 months after inclusion, except for a slight increase in pain scores in the SBRT group (n = 97).Conclusions: The TwiCs-design appears feasible in lung cancer patients with fair participation rates (although negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic). With a planned expansion to other centers, the COLOR-study is expected to enable multiple (randomized) evaluations of experimental interventions with important advantages for recruitment, generalizability, and long-term outcome data collection.

The overall survival impact of prophylactic cranial irradiation in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) patients has become more controversial. Since the publication of the systematic review by Aupérin et al. in 1999, no randomized controlled trials regarding PCI in LS-SCLC have been completed. The aim of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze the effect of PCI on overall survival (OS) in patients with LS-SCLC. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in the databases of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and the Cochrane library. Only studies that reported an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), indicating the effect of PCI versus no PCI on OS (adjusted for confounders) in patients with LS-SCLC were included for critical appraisal and meta-analysis. A pooled aHR estimate was calculated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Pooling of 28 retrospective studies including a total of 18,575 patients demonstrated a significant beneficial effect of PCI versus no PCI on OS with a pooled aHR of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.57-0.69). Substantial heterogeneity of reported aHRs among studies was observed (I2 = 65.9%). Subgroup analyses revealed that this heterogeneity could partly be explained by study sample size. The pooled aHR among 7 versus 21 studies with a sample size of > 300 versus ≤ 300 patients was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.64-0.97) versus 0.56 (95% CI: 0.46-0.69; p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates a significant beneficial effect of PCI on OS in patients with LS-SCLC. Larger studies reported a milder beneficial effect, possibly due to a decreased risk of model overfitting. Serious risk of selection and confounding bias were of concern due to the lack of prospective trials. These results support the role of PCI in standard clinical practice in patients with LS-SCLC while awaiting results of prospective trials on alternative strategies.

Patient-Reported Outcomes During Checkpoint Inhibition: Insight into Symptom Burden in Daily Clinical Practice.

CONTEXT: While praised for inducing durable anti-tumour responses, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) also cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that can vary in severity and affect health-related quality of life (HRQL). OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to provide insight into the course of symptoms and the influence of irAEs on HRQL measured with the treatment-specific Utrecht Symptom Diary Immunotherapy (USD-I). METHODS: In this observational cohort study, melanoma or non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with PD(L)1-inhibitors between February 2016 and December 2018 were included. Data on symptoms, wellbeing and influence of side effects on HRQL were obtained using the patient-scored, treatment-specific USD-I, which was completed as part of routine care. Patients scored symptom intensity on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS); NRS≥3 considered clinically relevant. RESULTS: A total of 162 melanoma (55%) or NSCLC (45%) patients completed 1493 USDs (median seven per patient). Most common patient-reported clinically relevant symptoms were: inactivity, fatigue, pain, cough and sleeping problems. Symptom prevalence decreased during treatment. Patients generally reported a low influence of side effects on HRQL. A higher number of clinically relevant symptoms at a certain time point correlated with poorer wellbeing. CONCLUSIONS: These data illustrate that ICI-treatment is generally well tolerated. However, especially the number of clinically relevant symptoms can impact patients wellbeing. Systematic use of an ICI-tailored PROM could create a window to discuss symptoms in a structured way which may promote personalized care during treatment.