Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 2024 May 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38713003

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Oral finasteride and topical minoxidil are the current standard of care for male androgenetic alopecia and a combination of the two treatments can be considered for greater efficacy. Clinical trials of topical finasteride have also yielded promising results, but routine care data are lacking. AIMS: To examine patient-reported outcomes of men with androgenetic alopecia who received topical finasteride admixed with minoxidil compared to the current standard of care (oral finasteride). METHODS: Retrospective, cross-sectional study with data from a German direct-to-consumer teledermatology platform between December 2021 and January 2023. Patient-reported outcomes were collected through voluntary follow-up questionnaires provided after 6 weeks on topical finasteride/minoxidil or oral finasteride treatment. RESULTS: A total of 1545 patients who received topical finasteride/minoxidil treatment were included; 238 (15.4%) participated in the follow-up questionnaire. At week six, 62.2% (148/238) reported positive changes in their hair appearance, and 44.1% (105/238) reported an improvement of self-esteem. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 11.8% (28/238). Full treatment adherence was observed in 74.4% (177/238). Comparing the topical treatment group to those receiving oral finasteride, lower treatment adherence was reported, along with higher rates of local adverse events; no difference was found in the incidence of sexual adverse events. CONCLUSION: Based on patient-reported outcomes, topical finasteride/minoxidil seems to be effective and well tolerated, but not superior to oral finasteride. Lower treatment adherence for topical usage must be considered when considering treatment options. Additional real-world data are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical finasteride/minoxidil.

2.
Digit Health ; 9: 20552076231205740, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37808234

RESUMEN

Objective: The use of direct-to-consumer (DTC) teledermatology platforms has increased, particularly for androgenetic alopecia (AGA). However, little is known about the efficacy and safety of these platforms. This study aimed to investigate the patient-reported treatment outcomes and safety of DTC teledermatology for the finasteride treatment of male AGA. Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study used data from a German DTC platform for finasteride treatment between December 2021 and January 2023. Patient-reported outcomes were collected through voluntary follow-up questionnaires provided to the patients six weeks after the first prescription to assess treatment outcomes and safety. Results: Data collection included 2269 patients. Of all patients who answered the follow-up questionnaire (n = 191), 79% (150 out of 191) self-reported positive changes in hair appearance, and 59% (113 out of 191) reported an improvement in self-esteem under treatment. Patients with self-reported positive changes in hair appearance were more likely to report improved self-esteem (P < 0.0001). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 12% (22 out of 191) of the patients. Full treatment adherence was reported in 87% (167 out of 191) of patients. Conclusion: From the patient's perspective, DTC teledermatology has the potential to improve hair appearance and self-esteem. Our results suggest that it may be an effective and safe treatment option for men with AGA, justifying low-threshold access. However, treatment-related adverse events should be closely monitored during follow-up. Further studies are required to evaluate the long-term effects of the DTC teledermatology treatment. By collecting real-world data, teledermatology platforms could be useful beyond their primary focus and could play an important role in the context of future research.

3.
Telemed Rep ; 4(1): 118-125, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37351463

RESUMEN

Background: Direct-to-consumer (DTC) online prescription platforms (OPP) for sexual health represent a potential paradigm shift in the diagnosis and treatment for sexual dysfunctions in the way men seek care. Knowledge of patients' risk profile using these platforms is limited. Aim: To assess risk profiles of patients reaching out to health care professionals through their DTC. Methods: Anonymized data originally collected between February 2021 to May 2022 by a DTC platform in the men's health care space were retrospectively analyzed. Data included the content of patient requests through a communication function, as well as the corresponding responses by the attending physician on staff. Each request was then assessed by two independent urologists and categorized by the level of the risk profile as well as the need to refer the patient to further medical evaluation. Results: Of 585 patient requests, 531 (90.8%) were classified as low risk. In the high-risk group, 32 patients were recommended to schedule an urgent appointment at a specialist. Only three patients (0.5%) were advised to seek emergency care. The overall referral rate for both risk groups was 52.3%. The requests of 279 patients (47.7%) were assessed as digitally treatable. Almost all patients who were digitally treatable were low risk. Side effects accounted for only 9.6% of all requests in the low-risk group, compared with 46.3% in the high-risk group. Conclusion: Overall, low-risk levels in the requests of patients using a DTC platform were reported, with almost half of them suitable to be solved digitally, whereas the other half required referral to an in-person specialist.

4.
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol ; 16: 937-945, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37041819

RESUMEN

Purpose: The number of online prescription platforms (OPPs) offering telemedical diagnosis and treatment, including finasteride, for androgenetic alopecia (AA) by using medical questionnaires (MQs) has increased. This type of care delivery differs completely from traditional forms. This study aimed to investigate a potential paradigm shift in AA treatment by measuring the extent of traffic generated by OPPs that exclusively treat AA and furthermore by characterizing sociodemographic features of men undergoing finasteride treatment from an OPP in Germany. Patients and Methods: Examination of three OPPs (Keeps, Shapiro MD, Myspring), offering finasteride treatment via MQ between Q1 2018 and Q1 2022 was performed by using SEMRush, a marketing software platform for traffic analysis. Further data regarding sociodemographic characteristics were collected from Myspring by recruiting men with AA who obtained finasteride prescriptions between March 2021 and January 2022. Results: A high number of unique quarterly visitors was recorded. The number of visitors increased on all platforms (Keeps 846%, Shapiro MD 109%, Myspring 427%). Most patients had accessed the platforms from mobile devices. Further data from Myspring included a total of 2904 men. Of all patients who answered the follow-up questionnaire (n = 177), 33.9% had been referred to the platform by television advertising. Of all respondents, 21.5% reported a monthly net income below 1000 euros. 45.2% of responding patients reported being single, while 15.3% considered themselves homosexual, and 4.5% bisexual. Convenience was the most common reason indicated for using an OPP (79.1%). Conclusion: The tremendous increase in the number of visits to OPPs for AA suggests a paradigm shift in medical care, particularly regarding MQ-based finasteride treatment. Sociodemographic data and reasons for platform use suggest that the shift away from traditional care models may increase in the future. The broad use of these digital health services warrants further investigation, particularly regarding patient safety.

6.
Telemed J E Health ; 29(10): 1484-1491, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36862525

RESUMEN

Background: There is a high demand for dermatological care in Germany. As use of teledermatology has increased significantly, this study aimed to investigate the impact of teledermatology on patient care. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study used data from a direct-to-consumer teledermatology platform using store-and-forward technology available in Germany between July 2021 and April 2022. Additional patient characteristics were collected using a voluntary follow-up questionnaire, 28 days after teleconsultation. Results: Data of 1,999 enrolled patients were evaluated. Patients had a mean age of 36 years, and 61.2% (1,223/1,999) lived in a rural residence. The most common diagnoses included eczema (36.0%, 701/1,946), fungal diseases (15.4%, 299/1,946), and acne (12.5%, 243/1,946). The follow-up questionnaire was answered by 166 patients (8.3%, 166/1,999). In total, 42.8% (71/166) of patients had undergone no previous medical consultation. The most frequent reason for using teledermatology was the waiting time for a dermatology outpatient appointment (62.0%, 103/166). A total of 62.0% (103/166) participants rated the treatment success as good or very good, while 86.1% (143/166) rated the quality of telemedical care as equal or better to that of an outpatient visit. Conclusion: This study showed that patients often use teledermatology because of functional barriers (waiting times). In this cohort, the diagnoses strongly corresponded to reasons for outpatient presentation. Most patients rated the quality of teledermatology service as at least equivalent to that of outpatient physician visits and reported treatment success. Thus, teledermatology can relieve the burden of outpatient care while providing high benefits from the patient's perspective.


Asunto(s)
Dermatología , Consulta Remota , Enfermedades de la Piel , Telemedicina , Humanos , Adulto , Enfermedades de la Piel/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Piel/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Transversales , Atención Ambulatoria , Alemania
7.
Telemed J E Health ; 29(7): 1051-1056, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36480808

RESUMEN

Background: Adherence to dermatological treatment is described as poor. Empathy and open communication in the physician-patient relationship has been proven to improve adherence. As direct-to-consumer teledermatology enables patients to access dermatological consultations without in-person interactions, we hypothesized treatment adherence in teledermatology to be low. Methods: The objective of the study was to examine treatment adherence in teledermatology. This retrospective cross-sectional study used data from patients treated through a German direct-to-consumer teledermatology platform between July 2021 and April 2022. Additional information was collected through voluntary follow-up questionnaires provided to patients to assess individual treatment success, treatment-related adverse events, and treatment adherence. Results: Data collection included 771 patients; 61.6% (475/771) were women (mean age 35 years). In 46% (355/771), skin disease had been present for <3 months before teleconsultation. Of all patients who answered the follow-up questionnaire (n = 228), 28.5% (65/228) reported treatment-related adverse events, with skin dryness being the most common (56.9%, 37/65). Adverse events resulting in treatment discontinuation were reported in 1.3% (3/228) of all cases. Improvement in skin condition on therapy was described by 75.4% (172/228). In 85.5% (195/228), full treatment adherence was reported. Conclusion: This is the first study worldwide to examine data on treatment adherence in direct-to-consumer-teledermatology. Despite the lack of doctor-patient interaction, the results of our study demonstrate that most patients show high treatment adherence. Possible drivers contributing to high compliance rates could be the high proportion of new-onset skin diseases, the high treatment success of the prescribed therapies, and the low rate of serious adverse events.


Asunto(s)
Dermatología , Médicos , Consulta Remota , Enfermedades de la Piel , Telemedicina , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Masculino , Dermatología/métodos , Telemedicina/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Transversales , Enfermedades de la Piel/terapia , Cumplimiento y Adherencia al Tratamiento , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
8.
Eur Urol Focus ; 8(3): 794-802, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34006491

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a major care problem worldwide. Tadalafil and sildenafil are the two most common phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5is) used to treat ED. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate patient data of a large online prescription platform (OPP), specifically analyzing preference for tadalafil over sildenafil. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data from a prospectively collected German OPP were retrospectively analyzed. This dataset included patients with a history of taking one or both substances (n = 26 821). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: ED patient baseline characteristics were derived from medical questionnaires for PDE5i prescriptions between May 2019 and May 2020. Order behavior was analyzed in patients who ordered both substances over time. We applied Kruskal-Wallis tests, χ² tests, and fisher's exact tests for statistical analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Baseline characteristics were comparable for both PDE5is in patients with a median age of 49 yr (sildenafil [interquartile range {IQR} 38-57]; tadalafil [IQR 39-56]), a median body mass index (BMI) of 26 kg/m² (sildenafil [IQR 24.54-29.03]; tadalafil [IQR 24.49-28.69]), ED onset time of >12 mo (sildenafil [87%]; tadalafil [88%]), and the presence of morning erections (sildenafil [62%]; tadalafil [61%]). Tadalafil prescriptions increased significantly from 30% (first order) to 80% (last order) in patients who had already tested both drugs. Patients with age ≤40 yr, BMI ≤25 kg/m², and sustained morning erections preferred tadalafil to sildenafil. CONCLUSIONS: Using database information from an OPP, preference for tadalafil was shown for patients who had tested both PDE5is. This preference was particularly pronounced in patients with age ≤40 yr, BMI ≤25 kg/m², and sustained morning erections. A well-managed OPP can be used for research on more complex health services. PATIENT SUMMARY: Analysis of large online prescription platforms provide the benefit of identifying young treatment-naïve patients with early-stage disease, which is highlighted by the fact that about two-thirds of our patients analyzed still maintained spontaneous morning erections. Patients who had tested tadalafil once developed preference for this drug.


Asunto(s)
Disfunción Eréctil , Carbolinas/uso terapéutico , Disfunción Eréctil/inducido químicamente , Disfunción Eréctil/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Prioridad del Paciente , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa 5/uso terapéutico , Piperazinas/uso terapéutico , Purinas/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Citrato de Sildenafil/uso terapéutico , Sulfonas/uso terapéutico , Tadalafilo/uso terapéutico
9.
Sex Med ; 8(3): 370-377, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32434669

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a highly common sexual dysfunction of men but often undertreated as patients experience high treatment barriers. AIM: The aims of this study were to characterize patients with ED using an online prescription platforms (OPPs) and determine treatment barriers that might prevent patients from seeking care in conventional health care settings. METHODS: Data from a German OPP were retrospectively analyzed with focus on patients suffering from ED with at least one online prescription of phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors between May 2019 and November 2019. In addition, a voluntary questionnaire was used to assess additional social features and prior treatment barriers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The main outcome measures were the epidemiological data, prescription metadata, and follow-up questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 11,456 male patients received prescriptions via the OPP (mean age: 49 years [95% CI 46.92-47.45]). Patients lived mainly in rural areas (69%) and frequently sought prescriptions outside the average office times of German urologists (49%). From all patients that responded to a follow-up questionnaire (n = 242), the majority were employed full-time (81%), married (50%), and native German (94%); 63.5% had not used PDE5 inhibitors before. From all repeat users, 41% had received them from unreliable sources. Reasons to seek treatment via the OPP were convenience (48%), shame (23%), and lack of discretion (13%). CONCLUSION: In this first study, to epidemiologically characterize ED patients of an OPP, it was confirmed that inconvenience is a treatment barrier, along with shame and perceived lack of discretion. This is the first evidence that OPPs reduce treatment barriers and ease access for patients to the medical system. Rodler S, von Büren J, Buchner A, et al. Epidemiology and Treatment Barriers of Patients With Erectile Dysfunction Using an Online Prescription Platform: A Cross-Sectional Study. Sex Med 2020;8:370-377.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...