Anti-epileptic drug use and subsequent degenerative dementia occurrence.

INTRODUCTION: The use of anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) in degenerative dementia (DD) remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the association of early AED administration with subsequent DD occurrence. METHODS: Using a large nationwide database, we enrolled patients newly diagnosed with epilepsy from 2014 to 2019 (n = 104,225), and using propensity score matching, we divided them into treatment (those prescribed AEDs in 2014) and control groups. The primary outcome was subsequent DD occurrence in 2019. RESULTS: Overall, 4489 pairs of patients (2156 women) were matched. The odds ratio (treatment/control) for DD occurrence was 0.533 (95% confidence interval: 0.459-0.617). The DD proportions significantly differed between the treatment (340/4489 = 0.076) and control (577/4489 = 0.129) groups. DISCUSSION: Among patients newly diagnosed with epilepsy, compared to non-use, early AED use was associated with a lower occurrence of subsequent DD. Further investigations into and optimization of early intervention for epilepsy in DD are warranted. Highlights: Anti-epileptic drug (AED) use before epilepsy diagnosis was linked with a lower subsequent degenerative dementia (DD) occurrence.Identifying the epileptic phenotype was crucial for justifying early AED use in DD.AED use with an epilepsy diagnosis did not pose an additional risk of DD.The potential contribution of combination drug therapy to the strategy was noted.

A computational clinical decision-supporting system to suggest effective anti-epileptic drugs for pediatric epilepsy patients based on deep learning models using patient's medical history.

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy, a chronic brain disorder characterized by abnormal brain activity that causes seizures and other symptoms, is typically treated using anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) as the first-line therapy. However, due to the variations in their modes of action, identification of effective AEDs often relies on ad hoc trials, which is particularly challenging for pediatric patients. Thus, there is significant value in computational methods capable of assisting in the selection of AEDs, aiming to minimize unnecessary medication and improve treatment efficacy. RESULTS: In this study, we collected 7,507 medical records from 1,000 pediatric epilepsy patients and developed a computational clinical decision-supporting system for AED selection. This system leverages three multi-channel convolutional neural network (CNN) models tailored to three specific AEDs (vigabatrin, prednisolone, and clobazam). Each CNN model predicts whether a respective AED is effective on a given patient or not. The CNN models showed AUROCs of 0.90, 0.80, and 0.92 in 10-fold cross-validation, respectively. Evaluation on a hold-out test dataset further revealed positive predictive values (PPVs) of 0.92, 0.97, and 0.91 for the three respective CNN models, representing that suggested AEDs by our models would be effective in controlling epilepsy with a high accuracy and thereby reducing unnecessary medications for pediatric patients. CONCLUSION: Our CNN models in the system demonstrated high PPVs for the three AEDs, which signifies the potential of our approach to support the clinical decision-making by assisting doctors in recommending effective AEDs within the three AEDs for patients based on their medical history. This would result in a reduction in the number of unnecessary ad hoc attempts to find an effective AED for pediatric epilepsy patients.

The Concurrent Use of Phenytoin and Levetiracetam for Seizure Prophylaxis in ICU Patients: The "Arrowhead Rationale".

The administration of multiple antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is standard practice for neurological intensive care unit (ICU) patients who cannot obtain seizure control with monotherapy. Phenytoin and levetiracetam continue to be highly utilized AEDs for ICU patients due to their efficacy and relatively low cost. However, there is no randomized control trial to date that assesses the efficacy outcomes of the concurrent use of these two medications for ICU patients in convulsive or silent status epilepticus that combats the toxicity with increasing dosages of a single drug by itself. Here, we have analyzed several studies published over the past two decades to better understand whether the concomitant use of these two medications is more efficacious in treating unremitting seizures in ICU patients. Several factors influence which AED is a better fit for ICU patients due to the complexity of their clinical state. Risk for drug interactions, increased incidence of renal and hepatic impairment, and higher need for patient monitoring are daily barriers that determine AED use. After analysis of past research, while the efficacy of concurrent use of levetiracetam and phenytoin is still not fully clear, we offer the "Arrowhead Rationale" for such dual therapy in a subset of patients at our tertiary care trauma and stroke center in Southern California.

Factors predicting seizure outcome after surgical excision of meningioma: SOLID-C guideline for prophylactic AED.

BACKGROUND: Seizures are commonly seen among meningioma patients and may cause impaired quality of life. These patients can be effectively treated with surgery. Still, many patients have persistent seizure episodes after surgery. The factors which are associated with worsening of seizure episodes remain critical in improving the quality of life for such patients. In this study, we aim to analyze the clinical and histopathological factors to predict the post excision seizure-outcome in meningioma and need of antiepileptic prophylaxis for these patients. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent primary resection of meningioma at our institute between 2007 and 2020 were included in the study. Eligibility criteria were as follows: (i) Surgery for newly-diagnosed biopsy proven meningioma, (ii) Presence of pre-operative seizure (iii) A follow-up period ≥ 12 months. RESULTS: Of the 1145 patients in this series, 333 patients were recruited in study. The major determinants of prophylactic anti-epileptic were tumour size (S), Oedema (O), location (L), inclusion body (I), antiepileptic drugs (D) and surgical complication (C). The factors independently associated with poor seizure control after surgical resection were presence of brain parenchyma invasion (p < 0.001), pre-operative use of > 2 antiepileptics (p = 0.016) and presence of intranuclear inclusion bodies (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The identification and consideration of factors associated with prolonged seizure control after surgery may help us to guide treatment strategies aimed at improving the quality of life for patients with meningiomas. Authors have proposed a SOLID-C guideline to avoid the blanket approach of prophylactic AED in patients undergoing for meningioma resection.

Toward the use of novel alternative methods in epilepsy modeling and drug discovery.

Epilepsy is a chronic brain disease and, considering the amount of people affected of all ages worldwide, one of the most common neurological disorders. Over 20 novel antiseizure medications (ASMs) have been released since 1993, yet despite substantial advancements in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms behind epileptogenesis, over one-third of patients continue to be resistant to available therapies. This is partially explained by the fact that the majority of existing medicines only address seizure suppression rather than underlying processes. Understanding the origin of this neurological illness requires conducting human neurological and genetic studies. However, the limitation of sample sizes, ethical concerns, and the requirement for appropriate controls (many patients have already had anti-epileptic medication exposure) in human clinical trials underscore the requirement for supplemental models. So far, mammalian models of epilepsy have helped to shed light on the underlying causes of the condition, but the high costs related to breeding of the animals, low throughput, and regulatory restrictions on their research limit their usefulness in drug screening. Here, we present an overview of the state of art in epilepsy modeling describing gold standard animal models used up to date and review the possible alternatives for this research field. Our focus will be mainly on ex vivo, in vitro, and in vivo larval zebrafish models contributing to the 3R in epilepsy modeling and drug screening. We provide a description of pharmacological and genetic methods currently available but also on the possibilities offered by the continued development in gene editing methodologies, especially CRISPR/Cas9-based, for high-throughput disease modeling and anti-epileptic drugs testing.

Early developmental deletion of forebrain Ank2 causes seizure-related phenotypes by reshaping the synaptic proteome.

Rare genetic variants in ANK2, which encodes ankyrin-B, are associated with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs); however, their pathogenesis is poorly understood. We find that mice with prenatal deletion in cortical excitatory neurons and oligodendrocytes (Ank2-/-:Emx1-Cre), but not with adolescent deletion in forebrain excitatory neurons (Ank2-/-:CaMKIIα-Cre), display severe spontaneous seizures, increased mortality, hyperactivity, and social deficits. Calcium imaging of cortical slices from Ank2-/-:Emx1-Cre mice shows increased neuronal calcium event amplitude and frequency, along with network hyperexcitability and hypersynchrony. Quantitative proteomic analysis of cortical synaptic membranes reveals upregulation of dendritic spine plasticity-regulatory proteins and downregulation of intermediate filaments. Characterization of the ankyrin-B interactome identifies interactors associated with autism and epilepsy risk factors and synaptic proteins. The AMPA receptor antagonist, perampanel, restores cortical neuronal activity and partially rescues survival in Ank2-/-:Emx1-Cre mice. Our findings suggest that synaptic proteome alterations resulting from Ank2 deletion impair neuronal activity and synchrony, leading to NDDs-related behavioral impairments.

SERS Detection of the Anti-Epileptic Drug Perampanel in Human Saliva.

Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) can obtain the spectroscopic response of specific analytes. In controlled conditions, it is a powerful quantitative technique. However, often the sample and its SERS spectrum are complex. Pharmaceutical compounds in human biofluids with strong interfering signals from proteins and other biomolecules are a typical example. Among the techniques for drug dosage, SERS was reported to detect low drug concentrations, with analytical capability comparable to that of the assessed High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. Here, for the first time, we report the use of SERS for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of the Anti-Epileptic Drug Perampanel (PER) in human saliva. We used inert substrates decorated with gold NPs deposited via Pulsed Laser Deposition as SERS sensors. We show that it is possible to detect PER in saliva via SERS after an optimized treatment of the saliva sample. Using a phase separation process, it is possible to extract all the diluted PER in saliva from the saliva phase to a chloroform phase. This allows us to detect PER in the saliva at initial concentrations of the order of 10-7 M, thus approaching those of clinical interest.

Epilepsy and brain tumors: Two sides of the same coin.

Epilepsy is the most common symptom in patients with brain tumors. The shared genetic, molecular, and cellular mechanisms between tumorigenesis and epileptogenesis represent 'two sides of the same coin'. These include augmented neuronal excitatory transmission, impaired inhibitory transmission, genetic mutations in the BRAF, IDH, and PIK3CA genes, inflammation, hemodynamic impairments, and astrocyte dysfunction, which are still largely unknown. Low-grade developmental brain tumors are those most commonly associated with epilepsy. Given this strict relationship, drugs able to target both seizures and tumors would be of extreme clinical usefulness. In this regard, anti-seizure medications (ASMs) are optimal candidates as they have well-characterized effects and safety profiles, do not increase the risk of developing cancer, and already offer well-defined seizure control. The most important ASMs showing preclinical and clinical efficacy are brivaracetam, lacosamide, perampanel, and especially valproic acid and levetiracetam. However, the data quality is low or limited to preclinical studies, and results are sometimes conflicting. Future trials with a prospective, randomized, and controlled design accounting for different prognostic factors will help clarify the role of these ASMs and the clinical setting in which they might be used. In conclusion, brain tumor-related epilepsies are clear examples of how close, multidisciplinary collaborations among investigators with different expertise are warranted for pursuing scientific knowledge and, more importantly, for the well-being of patients needing targeted and effective therapies.

Challenges of Treating an Acute Hepatitis C Virus Infection With Concurrent Seizure Treatment in a Free Clinic.

Currently, there is limited data evaluating the coadministration of first-generation anticonvulsants for epilepsy treatment and direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. There is a potential risk of suboptimal DAA serum concentrations that could potentially lead to HCV treatment failure. In this report, we describe the case of an uninsured, non-Hispanic Black male in his mid-40s with a history of generalized epilepsy that was managed with phenytoin 100mg twice a day and divalproex 500mg extended-release once daily. He was diagnosed with an acute hepatitis C viral infection with a genotype of 1a. Due to the viral genotype, treatment naivety, and lack of cirrhosis, the recommended treatment is to start glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, but the concomitant use of phenytoin and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is not recommended due to a drug-drug interaction that could lead to subtherapeutic DAA levels and possible treatment failure. Through shared decision-making and close follow-up, we slowly weaned the patient off phenytoin, replaced it with levetiracetam, and started glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. We successfully eradicated the patient's HCV infection, and no breakthrough seizures were reported. Although an unprecedented case and with the limited data evaluating the coadministration of DAAs and treatment of acute HCV infection, we were able to successfully treat and achieve full remission of the HCV infection. By virtue of this case report, we hope to encourage others to report similar cases and spread awareness regarding the difficulties in management.

Levetiracetam Versus Levetiracetam Plus Sodium Channel Blockers for Postoperative Epileptic Seizure Prevention in Brain Tumor Patients.

Background Brain tumor patients tend to develop postoperative epileptic seizures, which can lead to an unfavorable outcome. Although the incidence of postoperative epileptic seizures and adverse events are improved with the advent of levetiracetam (LEV), postoperative epilepsy occurs at a frequency of 4.6% or higher. In brain tumor patients, the addition of sodium channel blockers (SCBs) to LEV significantly reduces seizures, though confirmed in a non-postoperative study. Thus, the combination of SCBs with LEV might be promising. Objective In this prospective randomized controlled trial we investigated the safety, evaluated by adverse events during one and two weeks after surgery, and the efficacy, evaluated by the incidence of early epilepsy, including non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), of using LEV alone or SCBs added to LEV in patients who underwent craniotomy or biopsy for brain tumors or brain mass lesions. Methods Patients with brain tumors or brain mass lesions undergoing surgical interventions, excluding endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES), with a diagnosis of epilepsy were eligible for this study. Patients are randomized into either Group A or B (B1 or B2) after the informed consents are taken; LEV alone in Group A patients, while LEV and SCBs in Group B patients (GroupB1, intravenous fosphenytoin plus oral lacosamide (LCM) and GroupB2, intravenous LCM plus oral LCM) were administered postoperatively. Fifty-three patients were enrolled during the first two and a half years of the study and four of them were excluded, resulting in the accumulation of 49 patients' data. Results Postoperative epileptic seizures occurred only in three out of 49 patients during the first week (6.1%) and in seven patients within two weeks after surgery (14.3%, including the three patients during the first week). In Group A, epileptic seizures occurred in two out of 26 patients during the first week (7.7%) and in five patients within two weeks (19.2%) after surgery. In Group B, epileptic seizures occurred in one out of 23 patients during the first week (4.3%) and in two patients during the first two weeks (8.7%). Low complication grade of epileptic seizures was observed in Group B rather than in Group A, however, without significant difference (p=0.256). There was no difference in the frequency of adverse effects in each group. Conclusion Although not statistically significant, the incidence of epileptic seizures within one week after surgery was lesser in LEV+SCBs groups than in LEV alone. No hepatic damage or renal function worsening occurred with the addition of LCM, suggesting the safety of LEV+SCBs therapy.

Differential cytokine profiles produced by anti-epileptic drug re-exposure of peripheral blood mononuclear cells derived from severe anti-epileptic drug patients and non-allergic controls.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) and drug reactions with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) are the most common severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCARs). Anti-epileptic drugs are one of the most common drugs causing SCARs. Cytokine profiles of SCARs during culprit drug exposure have never been characterized. This study aimed to identify cytokine patterns between SCARs and non-SCARs in epilepsy patients and the patterns of DRESS and SJS/TEN. Epilepsy patients that showed allergic responses to anti-epileptic drugs that manifested as SJS/TEN or DRESS were recruited. Epilepsy patients with no drug allergy symptoms and healthy people were also recruited as control groups. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated and co-cultured with assigned anti-epileptic drugs according to the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT). LTT and measurement of cytokine levels in supernatants were performed on day six of cell cultivation. This study identified different cytokine expression patterns between SCAR and non-SCAR in epilepsy patients. Significant levels of IL-10, IL-12, IL-17, and GM-CSF were detected in non-SCAR epilepsy. However, the levels of IL-2, IL-5, IL-13, and IFN-gamma were significantly higher in supernatants of PBMCs of DRESS cultivated with AEDs relative to those of SJS/TEN. These cytokine levels were positively correlated with the cell proliferation index. Production of IL-5 and IL-13 was a unique characteristic of DRESS PBMCs. This study was the first to demonstrate distinct differences in cytokine levels between SCAR and non-SCAR PBMCs in epilepsy, which could help explain the immune-pathomechanism of drug hypersensitivity in SCARs. Different patterns of cytokine production and cell proliferation between DRESS and SJS/TEN in AED hypersensitivity were also demonstrated. Production of IL-5 and IL-13 might be a promising marker to define drug hypersensitivity in DRESS.

Status Epilepticus Secondary to Hypocalcemia Due to Vitamin D Deficiency.

Vitamin D deficiency is becoming more common around the world, owing to reduced sunshine exposure and an imbalanced diet. However, severe hypocalcemia as a result of vitamin D insufficiency is a rare occurrence, and it rarely leads to seizures in children. We present such a case in a 6-month-old infant who presented with status epilepticus secondary to hypocalcemia due to vitamin D deficiency, which was first misdiagnosed as epilepsy. Thereby, we want to emphasize that hypocalcemia secondary to vitamin D deficiency can lead to convulsion and the importance of vitamin D supplementation.

Retrospective Evaluation of First-line Levetiracetam use for Neonatal Seizures after Congenital Heart Defect repair with or without Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

OBJECTIVE: Levetiracetam (LEV) efficacy for neonatal seizures is debated. We evaluated LEV as a first line anti-seizure medicine (ASM) in neonates following neonatal congenital heart defect (CHD) repair who did not require extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) vs neonates who required ECMO. METHODS: A single center retrospective review of neonates with CHD from 2015 to 2020 was conducted. Neonates were included if seizures were present on continuous EEG after CHD repair either on or off ECMO, and they received LEV as a first line ASM. Primary outcomes were seizure resolution with LEV, adverse events and response to subsequent ASM. RESULTS: Eighteen total neonates were evaluated, 10 with seizures post-CHD repair who did not require ECMO and 8 who required ECMO. In the non-ECMO cohort, nine of ten were successfully treated with LEV monotherapy with no adverse events. In comparison, the eight neonates who required ECMO had a higher initial seizure burden (1.6% vs 17%, p=0.003), were more likely to have injury on neuroimaging (12.5 vs 75%, p= 0.04), and all neonates required multiple ASMs. Seizure burden did not decrease with LEV, but significantly decreased with phenobarbital and fosphenytoin (14.4% and 10.5%, p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Neonates with CHD and seizures on and off ECMO demonstrated divergent seizure characteristics including seizure burden and response to LEV. LEV may reduce neonatal seizure burden after uncomplicated CHD repair. However, in neonates requiring ECMO, multiple ASMs were required. A prospective evaluation of ASM efficacy and safety in this high-risk population is urgently needed.

Lack of association between generic brittleness and neuropsychiatric measures in patients with epilepsy.

PURPOSE: In a prior bioequivalence study, generic brittle (GB) patients with epilepsy who were considered at risk of worsened seizures or drug side effects from switching antiepileptic drug (AED) formulations demonstrated no significant difference in their drug levels when switched between a brand and generic AED. An alternative basis for being GB may relate to having a personality or mindset that predisposes to poor outcomes from a formulation switch. The objective of this study was to explore whether GB patients with epilepsy could be differentiated from not GB patients based on standardized measures of personality, mood, outlook, and beliefs. METHODS: This was an exploratory, observational, case-control, non-therapeutic study in patients with epilepsy. Patient interviews were conducted, and histories were collected, yielding each patient (n = 148) to be determined as GB or not GB. Eight neuropsychiatry tests were administered to n = 127 of these patients. Tests included Neuroticism Extraversion Openness Personality Inventory 3 (NEO-PI 3), Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R), Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-89 (QOLIE-89), Adverse Childhood Experiences Score (ACE), Physical Symptoms Questionnaire or Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15), Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and the Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire Epilepsy (BMQ-Epilepsy). A total of 23 Chi squared analyses, along with logistical regression, were performed to assess which tests and sub-elements associated with GB status. RESULTS: None of the neuropsychiatry tests or their sub-elements differentiated GB patients from not GB patients. Results implicate that standardized measures of personality, mood, outlook, and beliefs about their healthcare do not differ between GB and not GB patients with epilepsy, possibly because generic brittleness is caused by factors that neuropsychiatry tests do not measure. CONCLUSIONS: We hypothesized that being GB may relate to having a personality or mindset that predisposes patients to attributing poor outcomes to a formulation switch. However, findings here in patients with epilepsy did not uncover neuropsychiatric factors that predict which patients were GB and which were not GB.

Brivaracetam for the treatment of refractory epilepsy in patients with prior exposure to levetiracetam: A retrospective outcome analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine whether brivaracetam (BRV) provides an evident improvement in treatment efficacy and a reduction in treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in patients with refractory epilepsy, who previously failed treatment with levetiracetam (LEV). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data extracted from electronic patient files at Epilepsy Centre Kempenhaeghe (Heeze, the Netherlands) from the year 2000 until October 2020. METHODS: The inclusion criteria were met by 407 patients >18 years of age. During data collection, 26 patients were excluded due to too little follow-up information on the use of either LEV or BRV, and two more due to poor medication compliance, leaving a total of 379 patients for further analyses. All had used LEV before they started treatment with BRV. For every patient, data were collected including demographic information, efficacy (positive responder or non-responder) of LEV and BRV, and TEAEs occurring during LEV and BRV treatment. RESULTS: A total of 121 (29.8%) patients had discontinued BRV treatment before the end of data collection. At time of data collection the mean time since first seizure was 25.4 years. Of the 379 patients, 82.8% were diagnosed with focal epilepsy and 9.8% with generalized epilepsy. The median duration of treatment was 39 months for LEV and 20 months for BRV, the mean maximum dose was 1749.9 mg/day for LEV and 144.2 mg/day for BRV, and the mean number of concomitant AEDs was 1.4 at the start of LEV treatment and 2.0 at the start of BRV treatment. LEV was switched directly to BRV in 208 (54.9%) patients; 171 (45.1%) patients had an interval between discontinuation of LEV and the start of BRV. The mean duration of interval was 77.7 months. Of the patients who discontinued BRV, 30 (24.8%) switched back to LEV. Discontinuation of initial LEV treatment was due to TEAEs in 63.6% of patients, including 55.1% because of behavioural TEAEs. Discontinuation of BRV was due to inadequate efficacy in 24.0% of patients, to TEAEs in 47.1% and to both inadequate efficacy and TEAEs in 22.3%. Concerning efficacy, the analysis showed no significant difference between the positive responder rate of LEV and BRV (72.0% vs 69.1%, p>0.05). Of the patients who were positive responders to LEV treatment, 78.0% also had a positive response to BRV treatment. Of the non-responders to LEV treatment, 46.2% did have a positive response to BRV treatment. In comparison to LEV, patients reported significantly fewer TEAEs during BRV treatment (86.5% vs 61.7%, p<0.05). The most substantial difference was seen in the category 'behaviour' (55.1% vs 22.4%, p<0.05). Newly found behavioural TEAEs after switching from LEV to BRV were found in 7.1% of patients. CONCLUSION: Overall BRV was better tolerated than LEV, especially regarding the behavioural TEAEs. Efficacy analyses showed that patients are likely to have a positive response to BRV when they had a positive response to LEV. However, this is not always guaranteed. Lack of response to LEV does not preclude a positive response to BRV. All in all, BRV seems to be an interesting treatment option in patients previously treated with LEV.

Circulating MicroRNAs From Plasma Small Extracellular Vesicles as Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers in Pediatric Epilepsy and Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.

Pediatric epilepsy is a neurological condition that causes repeated and unprovoked seizures and is more common in 1-5-year-old children. Drug resistance has been indicated as a key challenge in improving the clinical outcomes of patients with pediatric epilepsy. In the present study, we aimed to identify plasma small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) derived microRNAs (miRNAs) from the plasma samples of children for predicting the prognosis in patients with epilepsy and drug-resistant epilepsy. A total of 90 children clinically diagnosed with epilepsy [46 antiepileptic drug (AED)-responsive epilepsy and 44 drug-resistant epilepsy] and 37 healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled in this study. RNA sequencing was performed to identify plasma sEVs derived miRNAs isolated from the children's plasma samples. Differentially expressed plasma sEVs derived miRNAs were identified using bioinformatics tools and were further validated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. In the present study, 6 miRNAs (hsa-miR-125b-5p, hsa-miR-150-3p, hsa-miR-199a-3p, hsa-miR-584-5p hsa-miR-199a-5p, and hsa-miR-342-5p) were selected for further validation. hsa-miR-584-5p, hsa-miR-342-5p, and hsa-miR-150-5p with area under curve (AUC) values of 0.846, 0.835, and 0.826, respectively, were identified as promising biomarkers of epilepsy. A logistic model combining three miRNAs (hsa-miR-584-5p, hsa-miR-342-5p, and hsa-miR-199a-3p) could achieve an AUC of 0.883 and a six miRNAs model (hsa-miR-342-5p, hsa-miR-584-5p, hsa-miR-150-5p, hsa-miR-125b-5p, hsa-miR-199a-3p, and hsa-miR-199a-5p) could attain an AUC of 0.888. The predicted probability of multiple miRNA panels was evaluated for differentiating between drug-resistant children and drug-responsive children. The AUC of a six-miRNA panel (hsa-miR-342-5p, hsa-miR-584-5p, hsa-miR-150-5p, hsa-miR-125b-5p, hsa-miR-199a-3p, and hsa-miR-199a-5p) reached 0.823. We identified and confirmed plasma sEVs derived miRNA biomarkers that could be considered as potential therapeutic targets for pediatric epilepsy and drug-resistant epilepsy.

Levetiracetam as a sensitizer of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: An open-label phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: An open-label single-arm phase 2 study was conducted to evaluate the role of levetiracetam as a sensitizer of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. This study aimed to determine the survival benefit of levetiracetam in conjunction with the standard treatment for glioblastoma. METHODS: Major eligibility requirements included histologically proven glioblastoma in the supratentorial region, patients 18 years or older, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2. Levetiracetam was given at 1,000-2,000 mg daily in two divided doses during CCRT and adjuvant chemotherapy thereafter. The primary and the secondary endpoints were 6-month progression-free survival (6mo-PFS) and 24-month overall survival (24mo-OS), respectively. Outcomes of the study group were compared to those of an external control group. RESULTS: Between July 2016 and January 2019, 76 patients were enrolled, and 73 patients were included in the final analysis. The primary and secondary outcomes were improved in the study population compared to the external control (6mo-PFS, 84.9% vs. 72.3%, p = 0.038; 24mo-OS, 58.0% vs. 39.9%, p = 0.018), but the differences were less prominent in a propensity score-matched analysis (6mo-PFS, 88.0% vs. 76.9%, p = 0.071; 24mo-OS, 57.1% vs. 38.8%, p = 0.054). In exploratory subgroup analyses, some results suggested that patients with ages under 65 years or unmethylated MGMT promoter might have a greater survival benefit from the use of levetiracetam. CONCLUSIONS: The use of levetiracetam during CCRT in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma may result in improved outcomes, but further investigations are warranted.

Effects of antiepileptic drugs on ovaries of female Wistar rats.

Valproate (VPA) induced changes in ovarian morphology are observed in humans with epilepsy and in non-epileptic animals. The effects of lamotrigine (LTG) on female reproduction is not well known. We investigated whether LTG might be a safer drug for use with patients of reproductive age. Forty Wistar albino female rats were divided into five groups. The control group was injected with saline-vehicle solution. The low dose (LD)-VPA group was injected with 100 mg/kg VPA. The high dose (HD)-VPA group was injected with 500 mg/kg VPA. The LD-LTG group was injected with 10 mg/kg LTG. The HD-LTG group was injected with 50 mg/kg LTG. We evaluated histological and biochemical changes in the ovaries. The number of atretic and cystic follicles was increased in the HD-VPA and HD-LTG groups compared to the control group. A significant increase in malondialdehyde level was found in the VPA groups compared to the control and LTG groups. No significant differences in total glutathione levels or superoxide dismutase activity were found among study groups. Catalase activity was significantly higher in HD-VPA and HD-LTG groups compared to the control, LD-VPA and LD-LTG groups. Prevalence and intensity of caspase-3 immunoreactivity in the luteal cells were significantly greater in the HD-LTG group compared to the control group. VPA administration caused polycystic ovarian syndrome-like changes in the ovary. We found that LD-LTG, which reflects the dose for humans, might be a safer option for use during the reproductive age.

An Atlas of the Quantitative Protein Expression of Anti-Epileptic-Drug Transporters, Metabolizing Enzymes and Tight Junctions at the Blood-Brain Barrier in Epileptic Patients.

The purpose of the present study was to quantitatively elucidate the levels of protein expression of anti-epileptic-drug (AED) transporters, metabolizing enzymes and tight junction molecules at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) in the focal site of epilepsy patients using accurate SWATH (sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion spectra) proteomics. Brain capillaries were isolated from focal sites in six epilepsy patients and five normal brains; tryptic digests were produced and subjected to SWATH analysis. MDR1 and BCRP were significantly downregulated in the epilepsy group compared to the normal group. Out of 16 AED-metabolizing enzymes detected, the protein expression levels of GSTP1, GSTO1, CYP2E1, ALDH1A1, ALDH6A1, ALDH7A1, ALDH9A1 and ADH5 were significantly 2.13-, 6.23-, 2.16-, 2.80-, 1.73-, 1.67-, 2.47- and 2.23-fold greater in the brain capillaries of epileptic patients than those of normal brains, respectively. The protein expression levels of Claudin-5, ZO-1, Catenin alpha-1, beta-1 and delta-1 were significantly lower, 1.97-, 2.51-, 2.44-, 1.90- and 1.63-fold, in the brain capillaries of epileptic patients compared to those of normal brains, respectively. Consistent with these observations, leakage of blood proteins was also observed. These results provide for a better understanding of the therapeutic effect of AEDs and molecular mechanisms of AED resistance in epileptic patients.

Zonisamide-Induced Hallucinations: An Anticonvulsant's Psychosis.

Zonisamide is a new-generation anticonvulsant that works by altering the sodium and T-type calcium channels in the brain. It is currently approved for partial seizures, and trials are ongoing to evaluate the effectiveness against mania and chronic pain in adults. Psychosis is a rare side effect with an incidence of 2%. Our patient, a 52-year-old female with a past medical history of osteoarthritis and chronic pain only relieved by zonisamide is brought to the emergency department (ED) after a two-day history of altered mental status, agitation and visual hallucinations. One month prior, she had undergone total knee arthroplasty complicated with right knee cellulitis managed by IV (intravenous) long-term antibiotics of vancomycin and ertapenem. Physical examination was remarkable for disorientation to person, place, and time with intact remainder of the neurological exam. Initial laboratory work was unremarkable and a computerized tomography (CT) scan of the brain showed no acute intracranial abnormalities. The patient was treated as ertapenem-induced with altered mental status and the antibiotic was switched to meropenem upon discharge. Two weeks later, the patient presented to the ED with similar non-resolving complaints. As the patient's symptoms didn't improve after ertapenem discontinuation, the decision was made to stop zonisamide and carefully monitor for possible withdrawal symptoms. Progressively, our patient had a timely resolution of symptoms with a full return to baseline within a week. This case demonstrates the potential severity of zonisamide-induced psychosis. Additional studies are warranted to analyze the mechanism explaining its neurological side effect profile.