RESUMEN
The Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) is a widely used self-report measure to evaluate insomnia symptoms based on the International Classification of Diseases criteria version 10 (ICD-10). Despite its extensive use in clinical and research settings, the reliability of the AIS has not been systematically investigated. This systematic review reports a reliability generalization meta-analysis study to assess the internal consistency and the test-retest reliability of the AIS across various populations and settings. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies reporting Cronbach's alpha and test-retest coefficients for the AIS. Pooled estimates of reliability, along with moderator analyses, were calculated. The AIS has an excellent internal consistency of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81 to 0.86), and re-test reliability of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80 to 0.92). The significant heterogeneity levels support the recommendation that future studies using the AIS include and discuss reliability estimates based on their own data.
RESUMEN
Objective: This study investigated the consistency and determined the optimal threshold values of three scales in the diagnosis of insomnia of ischemic stroke (IS) patients. Methods: Participants in this study consisted of 569 acute IS patients. All 569 patients completed the assessment of the three insomnia scales. Insomnia of IS patients were assessed by Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and Athens insomnia scale (AIS). Also, basic patient information, neurological function, and activities of daily living were assessed. General information was compared between the insomnia group and the no-insomnia group. Cronbach's α coefficients, Cohen's Kappa consistency, Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and DeLong's test analysis were used to analyze the reliability and diagnostic validity of PSQI, ISI, and AIS. Results: The PSQI and ISI showed high reliability with Cronbach's α of 0.875 and 0.858, respectively, while the AIS had an α coefficient of 0.734, demonstrating acceptable reliability. The PSQI, ISI, and AIS showed outstanding diagnostic ability with an AUC of 0.960 (95% CI: 0.946, 0.974), 0.911 (95% CI: 0.882, 0.941), and 0.876 (95% CI:0.837, 0.916). The best diagnostic cutoffs for PSQI, ISI, and AIS are ≥9, ≥15, and ≥8. Conclusion: Each of the three questionnaires has advantages and disadvantages when assessing insomnia. In the evaluation of insomnia in IS patients, the best questionnaire selection should be made according to the purpose of clinical evaluation and considering the sensitivity and specificity.
