Banded versus non-banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: short, mid, and long-term surgical outcomes - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is considered as one of the most effective treatments for people with obesity. A variant of this procedure, the banded-RYGB, may present several advantages over the standard technique. These potential benefits include enhanced weight loss, decreased recurrent weight gain, a lower incidence of dumping syndrome, and less distention of the jejunum below the gastrojejunostomy. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this meta-analysis is to compare the surgical outcomes of RYGB procedures with a band (banded-RYGB) and without a band (RYGB) in the management of individuals with obesity. SETTING: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and the Cochrane protocol (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023439874). METHOD: The systematic review process led to the identification of 13 comparative studies involving 3230 patients who underwent banded-RYGB and 5302 who received RYGB, all of which were eligible for inclusion and meta-analysis. RESULTS: Four studies reported data on 1-year postoperative percent excess weight loss (%EWL), demonstrating a significant increase of 6.03 %EWL in patients who underwent banded-RYGB. Four studies reported the 2-year postoperative %EWL, showing that patients who had banded-RYGB experienced a 5.32 greater %EWL compared to those who received RYGB, even if this was not statistically significant. For 5-year %EWL after bariatric surgery, 5 studies were included for continuous outcome meta-analysis. The average 5-years %EWL difference was 7.6 in favor of banded-RYGB. Patients who had banded-RYGB presented a nonsignificant 1.45 OR of developing postoperative complications compared to patients receiving RYGB. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrates that, compared to RYGB, patients who underwent banded-RYGB surgery showed a statistically significant increase in the %EWL at 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively. Moreover, the banding procedure does not significantly increase the risk of postoperative complications.

Long-term Comparative Evaluation of Weight Loss and Complications of Banded and Non-banded Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

PURPOSE: The use of a nonadjustable silicone band around the gastric pouch of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) to reduce the recurrence of obesity is still being debated in the literature. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate banded and non-banded RYGB regarding % total weight loss (%TWL) and complications up to 10 years postoperatively and regarding the removal rate of the silicone band. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study of the medical records of all patients submitted to banded and non-banded RYGB between 2000 and 2020 was conducted. Clinical data (age, gender, weight, body mass index-BMI, comorbidities, %TWL, and the prevalence of vomiting) and laboratory data (hemoglobin, serum iron, albumin, and vitamin B12) were obtained preoperatively and at 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10 years for both groups and at 12, 15, and 20 years after banded RYGB. RESULTS: In total, 858 patients underwent RYGB: 409 underwent banded RYGB and 449 underwent non-banded RYGB. In the preoperative period, banded RYGB patients were heavier and had higher rates of hypertension and dyslipidemia. The %TWL was higher in the banded RYGB group up to 7 years. The prevalence of vomiting is much higher in this group, which also had lower laboratory test values. Of the banded RYGB patients, 9.53% had to have the silicone ring removed after presenting complications. CONCLUSION: Banded RYGB promotes significantly higher rates of TWL at the expense of a higher frequency of food intolerance and vomiting.

Convincing 10-Year Follow-up Results of the Banded Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have shown the positive effect on weight loss of the banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (BRYGB). Thus far, studies describing the 10-year post-operative results are scarce. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe the weight loss results, effect on associated medical problems, and complication rates during 10 years of follow-up after BRYGB. METHOD: Data were collected from patients who underwent laparoscopic BRYGB with a non-adjustable silicone gastric ring between January 2011 and March 2013. All patients were included when found to be eligible according to the IFSO criteria. RESULTS: One hundred forty-nine patients were included, 110 received a primary BRYGB and 39 received a conversional BRYGB. The primary BRYGB group consisted of 68% female patients with a mean BMI of 44.5 kg/m2 and a mean age of 46 years old. The conversional group consisted of 77% females and had a mean BMI of 34.8 kg/m2 and a mean age of 48 years. At 10-year follow-up, 67.1% of the data was available. Ten-year post-operative 30% total weight loss was seen in the primary group, and 7% in the conversional group. In 10 years, 23% of the patients had complications of which half were ring-related. CONCLUSION: The addition of a silicon ring to the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass may result in substantial and stable weight loss maintenance 10 years post-operative. Furthermore, the number of patients with long-term complications was low and the number of associated medical problems was significantly reduced.

Laparoscopic Banded Gastric Bypass: A Case Report of a Successful Weight Loss Despite Gastro-Gastric Fistula.

Obesity is a global health issue, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), is an effective treatment for weight loss. However, some patients experience insufficient weight loss after RYGB, leading to alternative strategies such as adding an adjustable gastric band to the bypass. This case reports a 43-year-old female with morbid obesity who underwent open RYGB in 2004, achieving significant weight loss. However, she experienced weight regain, indicating RYGB failure. A laparoscopic band was placed around her bypass with no post-operative complications and successful steady weight reduction. During follow-up, an upper gastrointestinal series revealed a gastro-gastric fistula. Despite the fistula, the patient maintained a steady weight, with a significant excess weight loss of 40.2% since the banded gastric bypass surgery. The development of a gastro-gastric fistula, which typically affects weight loss outcomes, was managed conservatively without impacting the patient's steady weight maintenance. This highlights an unexpected weight loss outcome in a patient who underwent laparoscopic banding following RYGB failure and later developed a gastro-gastric fistula. Despite the initial RYGB failure, the patient achieved significant weight loss, surpassing the average reported in previous studies.

First Global Report of Catastrophic Results Due to Internal Herniation of Roux Limb in the Space Between the Gastric Pouch and Band: a Series of 3 Cases of Banded Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (BRYGB).

BACKGROUND: Banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (BRYGB) is associated with complications known with the bypass along with specific complications related to the band. Roux-limb gangrene, due to herniation between the gastric pouch and band, however, has no mention in literature. METHODS: We report this potentially fatal complication of BRYGB and its management in a series of 3 patients. RESULTS: All 3 patients were women, 35-45 years, with a BRYGB (roux limb-150 cm, biliopancreatic limb-100 cm) using a MiniMizer or a Fobi ring with 2-point fixation to the gastric pouch 2 cm above the gastrojejunostomy. All patients presented 3-4 years post-BRYGB, with an average total body weight loss (TWL%) of 41.28%. To discuss video of a single case, a 35-year-old female presented with abdominal pain, hematemesis and signs of abdominal tenderness and guarding. X-Ray abdomen showed distended small bowel loops and CT-scan revealed ischemic small bowel loops with free fluid. Diagnostic laparoscopy showed alimentary/roux limb (AL) gangrene, from the gastrojejunostomy to the jejunojejunostomy. The entire AL had herniated between the gastric pouch and band which had formed an obstructive ring around the herniated bowel loop and led to compromise of blood supply and gangrene. Resection of gangrenous bowel with reversal of BRYGB was done. CONCLUSION: Early diagnosis and timely management may save a patient from gangrene. It also raises questions: Is a 2-point fixation of the band to the gastric pouch insufficient? Does a longer roux limb make it prone to herniating in the space between the gastric pouch and band?

The Benefits of Banded over Non-banded Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Patients with Morbid Obesity: a Multi-center Study.

BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has proven to be an effective treatment for obesity with excellent long-term results, even though weight regain can occur. A method to improve the results of RYGB and minimize chance of weight regain is banded RYGB. Better sustained weight loss is also related to higher remission of comorbidities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of banded and non-banded RYGB on long-term weight loss results and comorbidities. METHOD: A retrospective comparative data study was performed. Patients who underwent a primary RYGB between July 2013 and December 2014 and followed a 5-year follow-up program in the Dutch Obesity Clinic were included. Comorbidities were assessed during screening and follow-up. RESULTS: The study included 375 patients with mean weight and body mass index (BMI) of 128.9 (± 21.2) kg and 44.50 (± 5.72) kg/m2. Of this group, 184 patients underwent RYGB and 191 banded RYGB. During follow-up (3 months, 1-5 years) % Total Weight Loss (%TWL) was superior in the banded group (32.6% vs 27.6% at 5 years post-operative, p < 0.001). Complication rates in both groups were similar. Comorbidity improvement or remission did not significantly differ between the two groups (p = 0.14-1.00). After 5 years of follow-up, 79 patients (20.5%) were lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION: Banded RYGB does show superior weight loss compared to non-banded RYGB. No difference in effect on comorbidity improvement or remission was observed. Since complication rates are similar, while weight loss is significantly greater, we recommend performing banded RYGB over non-banded RYGB.

Mechanical ileus and mesenteric ischemia as complications of MiniMizer-gastric-ring after laparoscopic banded Roux-en-Y-gastric bypass: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Banded laparoscopic Roux-en-Y-gastric bypass (B-LRYGB) is a surgical technique that involves reinforcing the restriction by placing a silicone ring 2 cm above the gastrojejunostomy to prevent pouch dilation, thereby maintaining the achieved weight loss and preventing weight regain. Gastrojejunostomy stenosis, erosions, and ring-migration (slippage) are well-known complications in patients undergoing banded laparoscopic procedures. We believe that our study makes a significant contribution to the literature because, to the best of our knowledge, cranial slippage (herniation) of the alimentary limb through a non-slipped MiniMizer gastric ring after B-LRYGB as well as mesenteric ischemia because of ventral slippage have not been described before in the published literature. PRESENTATION OF CASE: This study presents two rare complications in middle-aged women 26 months after B-LRYGB. The first case presented with mechanical ileus due to herniation of the alimentary limb without slippage of the MiniMizer ring. The second case involved mesenteric ischemia following ventral migration of the MiniMizer ring with herniation of the alimentary limb and its mesentery through the ring with consequent torsion of the mesentery. Both patients were managed with surgical intervention and band removal. The postoperative course was uneventful. DISCUSSION: In cases of MiniMizer ring complications, the presentation can be either acute or chronic. Severe mesenteric ischemia is acute and can be fatal. Patients may also present with chronic recurrent abdominal pain or mechanical ileus. The loss of mesenteric fat after successful weight loss might lead to the cranial herniation of the alimentary limb. This could also be a result of dysmotility or reverse peristalsis secondary to ectopic pacemaker cells over a fixed point (in this case, the gastrojejunostomy with the MiniMizer ring) [4,5]. A gradual herniation of the intestinal wall over the fixed point can also occur due to recurrent dietary non-adherence (such as large portions and hard consistency of the food). CONCLUSION: A high sense of suspicion and radiological investigation are crucial factors in reaching the proper diagnosis. Further studies should be conducted to examine whether other forms of ring placement or fixation could help avoid the risk of potentially fatal complications.

Impact of Laparoscopic Banded Gastric Bypass on Weight Loss Surgery Outcomes: 5 Years' Experience.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate 5-year outcomes of banded gastric bypass (BRYGB) as a primary and conversion bariatric procedure. METHODS: Retrospective review of BRYGB between January 2011and March 2013. Outcomes included percentage of total weight loss (%TWL), weight loss maintenance, and band-related complications. RESULTS: One hundred forty-two patients underwent BRYGB, 106 primary and 36 conversions. Indications for conversion to BRYGB were complications of the primary procedure (n = 19), insufficient weight loss (n = 5), and weight regain (n = 12). In the primary group, mean preoperative BMI was 44.8 kg/m2 (± 6.9 kg/m2). Compared with preoperative weight, mean %TWL was 33.9% (n = 95), 34.1% (n = 82), 34.0% (n = 70), 33.9% (n = 62), and 31.8% (n = 75) after 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively. In conversions secondary to failed primary procedure (insufficient WL and weight regain), mean preoperative BMI was 40.8 kg/m2 (± 6.01 kg/m2). Despite one patient gaining weight, mean %TWL was 25.7% (n = 13), 28% (n = 11), 23.9% (n = 8), 18.3% (n = 8), and 15.1% (n = 12) after 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively. In conversions secondary to primary procedure complications (n = 19), mean preoperative BMI was 28.4 kg/m2 (± 3.5 kg/m2). After 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, mean BMI was 28.1 (n = 15), 29 (n = 10), 29.8 (n = 9), 30.6 (n = 10), and 30.9 (n = 12) kg/m2, respectively. Band-related complications after 5 years: three erosion and five patients complained of persistent dysphagia. One band needed reposition. Perioperative surgical complications: two bleeding, one leakage, one port-site hernia, and one food impaction. CONCLUSION: Banded gastric bypass has good results in terms of weight loss and weight loss maintenance in both primary and conversional bariatric procedures with acceptable incidence of band-related complications.

OAGB vs BGBP: A retrospective comparative study of a cohort of patients who had bariatric surgery in 2012 at one centre by a single surgeon.

Two modifications of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and Roux-en-Y banded gastric bypass (BGBP), are gaining popularity in use because the OAGB is reported to be a simpler operation, and the BGBP is reported to have sustained weight loss compared to standard RYGB. A retrospective review and analysis of data comparing outcomes up to 5 years after BGBP and OAGB from a prospectively maintained database of all bariatric metabolic operations in 2012 was performed. Eighty-two patients underwent a BGBP and 90 an OAGB. The average age and body mass index were 44.12 and 43.97 and 43.57 and 45.79 in the BGBP and OAGB groups, respectively. Postoperative nutrient deficiencies were similar in both groups but were more prominent in the OAGB group. The % excess body weight loss (%EBWL) was 78% and 71.5% at 5 years in the OAGB and BGBP groups, respectively. The % total weight loss (%TWL) was also higher in OAGB compared to the BGBP group, 34.72% and 30.49%, respectively. Resolution of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) was significantly higher in the OAGB group, 79.16%, than in the BGBP group, 71.42%. The resolution of dyslipidaemia and hypertension were similar in both groups, but sleep apnoea resolution was higher in OAGB group. Both operations produced excellent weight loss in the intermediate term. The %EBWL and resolution of T2DM were significantly higher after the OAGB operation at the expense of increased incidence of nutrient deficiencies and hypoproteinemia. Quality of life improvement and patient satisfaction were high after both operations. Long-term follow up and multicentre prospective studies are needed to confirm these intermediate outcomes.

Banded vs. non-banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

We aim to review the available literature on patients with morbid obesity treated with banded (BRYGB) or non-banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (NBRYGB), in order to compare the clinical outcomes and intraoperative parameters of the two methods. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane library and Scopus databases, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria incorporating 3899 patients. This study reveals similar rates of complications, mortality, remission of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, gastroesophageal reflux and obstructive sleep apnoea, along with similar % excess weight loss (%EWL) at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. In contrast, according to an analysis of two eligible studies the BRYGB procedure was associated with increased %EWL at 5 years postoperatively. These results should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of statistical arms and randomized controlled studies. However, the present article represents the best available evidence in the field. Well-designed, randomized controlled studies, comparing BRYGB to NBRYGB, are necessary to further assess their clinical outcomes.

Endoscopic management of erosion after banded bariatric procedures.

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic materials wrapped around a portion of the stomach have been used to provide gastric restriction in bariatric surgery for many years. Intraluminal erosion of adjustable and nonadjustable gastric bands typically occurs many years after placement and results in various symptoms. Endoscopic management of gastric band erosion has been described and allows for optimal patient outcomes. OBJECTIVES: We will describe our methods and experience with endoscopic management of intraluminal gastric band erosions after bariatric procedures. SETTING: University hospital in the United States. METHODS: A retrospective review of our bariatric surgery database identified patients undergoing removal of gastric bands. A chart review was then undertaken to confirm erosion of prosthetic material into the gastrointestinal tract. Baseline characteristics, operative reports, and follow-up data were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were identified with an eroded gastric band: 11 after banded gastric bypass, 3 after laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB), and 2 after vertical banded gastroplasty. All patients were successfully treated with endoscopic removal of the prosthetic materials using either endoscopic scissors or ligation of the banding material with off-label use of a mechanical lithotripter device. Complications included a postoperative gastrointestinal bleed requiring repeat endoscopy, 1 patient with asymptomatic pneumoperitoneum requiring observation, and 1 with seroma at the site of LAGB port removal. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic management of intraluminal prosthetic erosion after gastric banded bariatric procedures can be safe and effective and should be considered when treating this complication. Erosion of the prosthetic materials inside the gastric lumen allows for potential endoscopic removal without free intraabdominal perforation. Endoscopic devices designed for dividing eroded LAGBs may help standardize and increase utilization of this approach.

Endoscopic Management of Eroded Bands Following Banded-Gastric Bypass (with Video).

BACKGROUND: Banded-gastric bypass is a highly effective bariatric procedure, yet the possibility of band erosion remains a significant drawback. Surgical removal of eroded bands may be associated with significant morbidity. In this study, we assess the efficacy and safety of a solely peroral endoscopic approach for the management of eroded bands in patients with a banded-gastric bypass. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Starting January 2012, all patients with banded-gastric bypass and an eroded band were subjected to an attempt at peroral endoscopic removal using endoscopic scissors and/or argon plasma coagulation (APC), regardless of the circumference of band eroding inside the lumen. RESULTS: Sixteen patients presented with eroded bands, 2 were deemed not amenable to endoscopic removal as only part of the thickness was eroded. Of the 14 patients where endoscopic attempts were performed, 12 (86%) were completely removed successfully, while 2 (14%) were cut but could not be extracted and only the intraluminal portion was trimmed. Complete resolution of symptoms occurred in 13 (93%) while in 1 patient (7%) there was partial improvement. Only one endoscopic session was performed per patient with a median time of 37.5 min per session (22-55 min). No complications were encountered. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic removal of eroded gastric bands in patients with banded-gastric bypass is effective and safe in the majority of patients. When bands are adherent to the gastric wall, removal of the intraluminal portion of the band may lead to full or partial improvement of symptoms. Endoscopic band removal can be attempted even when a small part of band circumference has eroded.

Banded Gastric Bypass: Better Long-Term Results? A Cohort Study with Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: While gastric bypass has been the treatment of choice for morbid obesity, insufficient weight loss and even weight regain has been observed in a sub-group of patients. Dilatation of the pouch, pouch outlet, and proximal alimentary limb have been suggested to cause weight regain on the long term. The banded gastric bypass surgery has been introduced to overcome this problem. METHODS: Four hundred thirty-two patients (n = 254, non-banded/n = 178, banded-GaBP Ring™) were followed-up for 5 years. Patients were evaluated for weight loss, % excess weight loss (%EWL), weight regain and BMI. RESULTS: No significant differences between groups in the first year following surgery were observed in terms of weight loss and %EWL. %EWL at 5 years was as follows: non-banded 65.2 ± 20.0 %; banded 74.0 ± 15.1 %. At 5 years, the banded group showed more weight loss (non-banded 35.4 ± 12.5; banded 43.9 ± 11.9 kg, P < 0.0001); weight regain was significantly higher in the non-banded group (P < 0.0001). Only minor complications were reported; no signs of ring migration or slippage were reported. CONCLUSION: Although, following the first year after surgery, no differences in treatment groups were observed in terms of weight loss, 5 years following surgery, patients who received banded surgery maintained better weight loss and had less weight regain compared to the non-banded group. These results suggest that laparoscopic banded gastric bypass using a silastic ring was effective in maintaining weight loss on the long term, while the complication rate was low. The banded gastric bypass is regarded by us as the new gold standard.

Banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is the most effective treatment for morbid obesity. The additional benefit of placing a nonadjustable band around the pouch remains to be determined. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes between banded and nonbanded LRYGB patients in a single bariatric center. METHODS: A matched cohort analysis was performed between patients who had undergone banded and nonbanded (standard) LRYGB. In the banded bypass cohort, an 8 F, 6.5 cm silastic ring was placed around the proximal gastric pouch. Both cohorts were matched for age, body mass index (BMI), and anastomotic technique. Endpoints included percentage excess weight loss (%EWL), postoperative morbidity, and band-related complications. RESULTS: Between January 2007 and July 2010, 134 banded LRYGB were performed (55% female, mean age 45 years). They were compared with a matched cohort of 134 concurrent nonbanded LRYGB patients (67% female, mean age 45.4 years). Mean preoperative BMI was 54.6 and 52.8 kg/m(2), respectively (P = .084). At 24 months postoperatively, the average %EWL was 58.6% in banded bypass patients and 51.4% in the nonbanded group (P = .015). The difference in EWL was more pronounced in super-obese patients than in those with BMI<50 (among super-obese, 57.5% versus 47.6%, P = .003; among those with BMI<50, 62.9% versus 57.9%, P = .406]. There was no difference in early (19.4% versus 19.4%) or late complications (10.4% versus 13.4%, P = .451) between banded and nonbanded LRYGB patients. CONCLUSION: Banding the pouch during LRYGB can be performed safely and may provide better weight loss, particularly in super-obese patients. Further prospective and long-term comparative studies of this technique are warranted.