Efficiency of HoLEP in patients with detrusor underactivity and renal dysfunction secondary to BPO.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the bladder and renal functional outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in patients with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) complicated by detrusor underactivity (DU) and secondary renal dysfunction. METHODS: Thirty-one patients were included in this prospective study. Eligible patients had urinary retention, a bladder outlet obstruction index (BOOI) greater than 40, a bladder contractility index (BCI) less than 100, abnormal renal function at the initial diagnosis (serum creatinine > 132 µmol/L) and a renal pelvis anteroposterior diameter (PRAPD) > 1.5 cm bilaterally. All patients underwent HoLEP in a routine manner and were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery. The baseline characteristics of the patients, perioperative data, postoperative outcomes and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Significant improvement was observed in the international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL) score, maximal urinary flow rate (Qmax), post-void residual volume (PVR), Scr and RPAPD at the 6-month follow-up. Bladder wall thickness (BWT) exhibited a decreasing trend but did not significantly differ from the preoperative values. No grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred, and grade 3 and lower complications were treated conservatively. Three patients required reinsertion of indwelling catheters, and they were able to void spontaneously after two weeks of catheterisation training and medication treatment. CONCLUSION: HoLEP is an effective treatment for men with BPO accompanied by DU and consequent renal function impairment. Patients are able to regain spontaneous voiding. Both bladder and renal functions were preserved and improved.

Thulium laser transurethral incision of the prostate with ejaculation-sparing intent: 2-year follow-up outcomes from a high-volume centre.

Introduction: Several 'ultra-minimally-invasive' surgical treatments (uMISTs) have been developed, aiming to relieve benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) and spare ejaculatory function; however, such techniques do not always ensure substantial improvements in uroflowmetry parameters. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the 2-year functional outcomes of thulium laser transurethral incision of the prostate (ThuIP) as an alternative to uMISTs. Material and methods: Data of consecutive patients affected by BPO with indication to surgical intervention and a strong will to spare ejaculatory function were collected on a dedicated prospectively maintained database. A specific "trifecta" was identified as the contemporary presence of: (1) post-operative Qmax ≥15 ml/s; (2) absence of early (within 90 days) complications; and (3) preserved antegrade ejaculation. Results: 120 patients underwent ThuIP and were analysed. Median catheterisation time was 2 days (IQR 2-2). Significant improvements in IPSS and IPSS-QoL scores and uroflowmetry parameters were observed at all follow-up times. At the last follow-up visit (24 months) the median ΔIPSS was -12 (-17; -9), median ΔIPSS-QoL was -3 (-4; -2), median ΔQmax was +7.7 ml/s (+5.2; +11.0), and median ΔPVR was -50 ml (-100; 0) (all p-values <0.001). Fourteen patients reported postoperative absence of antegrade ejaculation (11.7%). Overall, trifecta was achieved in 86 patients (71.7%) at 6 months, in 79 patients (65.8%) at 12 months, and in 75 patients (62.5%) at 24 months. Conclusions: ThuIP allows for a significant improvement in uroflowmetry parameters and patient-reported outcomes at 2-year follow-up. Moreover, antegrade ejaculation is preserved in approximately 90% of cases.

Outcomes after laser enucleation of the prostate with and without significant storage symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: To test for differences in recovery of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) between patients with storage-positive vs -negative symptoms after laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive storage-positive (severe storage symptoms, International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS] storage subscore >8) vs storage-negative patients treated with LEP (November 2017-September 2022) within our tertiary-care database were identified. Mixed linear models tested for changes in IPSS and quality of life (QoL) at 1, 3 and 12 months after LEP. Multiple linear regression models tested for LUTS and QoL recovery risk factors at 1, 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: Of 291 study patients, 180 (62%) had storage-positive symptoms. There were no differences between storage-positive and -negative patients in mean adjusted total IPSS, IPSS-storage, IPSS-voiding and QoL at 12 months after LEP. In multiple linear regression models, storage-positive status was identified as a risk factor for higher IPSS at 1 month (ß coefficient 2.98, P = 0.004) and 3 months (ß coefficient 2.24, P = 0.04), as well as for more unfavourable QoL at 1 month (ß coefficient 0.74, P = 0.006) and 3 months (ß coefficient 0.73, P = 0.004) after LEP. Conversely, at 12 months there were no differences between storage-positive vs -negative patients. CONCLUSION: Storage-positive patients appear to experience similar long-term benefits from LEP compared to storage-negative patients. However, significant storage symptoms are associated with higher total IPSS and less favourable QoL at 1 and 3 months after LEP. These findings advocate for the consideration of LEP also in storage-positive cases with the need for thorough patient education especially in the initial post-LEP period.

Age-related impairment in testosterone elevation after anterior fibromuscular stroma preserved enucleation.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the impact of anterior fibromuscular stroma preserved enucleation (AFSPE) of the prostate on serum testosterone levels in patients with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) and to explore age-related differences in postoperative testosterone elevation. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, 304 patients from a pool of 560 who underwent AFSPE at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between January 2018 and December 2021 were evaluated. Patients were stratified based on preoperative testosterone levels into low (<3.5 ng/mL) and normal (≥3.5 ng/mL) groups. Serum testosterone levels were measured preoperatively, at 1.5 and 3-6 months postoperatively. Age and other demographic data were analyzed as potential factors influencing testosterone changes. RESULTS: The low-testosterone group (n = 90) showed significant testosterone increases, from an average of 2.61 ng/mL preoperatively to 3.3 ng/mL at 1.5 months and 3.59 ng/mL at 3-6 months postoperatively (p < 0.0001). The normal-testosterone group (n = 214) maintained stable testosterone levels at 1.5 months but exhibited a significant rise to 6.06 ng/mL by 3-6 months (p = 0.0079). Older age was inversely associated with postoperative testosterone elevation in both groups. Improvements in nocturia were notable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: AFSPE of the prostate significantly elevates serum testosterone levels in men with BPO, particularly benefiting those initially with low levels. Age is a crucial factor influencing postoperative testosterone changes, indicating that younger patients may benefit more from this intervention. AFSPE offers a promising approach for improving hormonal health in BPO patients, alongside alleviating urinary symptoms.

Comparison of HoLEP, ThuLEP and ThuFLEP in the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: a propensity score-matched analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), Thulium laser enucleation of prostate (ThuLEP) and Thulium fibre laser enucleation of prostate (ThuFLEP) by performing propensity score matched analysis (PSM). METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the patients who underwent HoLEP (Group 1, n = 696), ThuLEP (Group 2, n = 146) and ThuFLEP (Group 3, n = 193) surgery because of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). A 1:1:1 HoLEP: ThuLEP: ThuFLEP group matching was performed using PSM analysis. Perioperative, postoperative functional outcomes and complications were analysed and compared. RESULTS: We observed significant improvement in functional parameters regarding IPSS, Qmax, PVR and quality of life in all groups compared to baseline values at the 1st, 6th and 12th postoperative months. There was no significant difference between different laser types in terms of urge (UUI) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) at 1st postoperative month. In all three groups, no patient had postoperative SUI or UUI at 6th and 12th postoperative months. In addition, no significant difference was observed between laser types in terms of postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: HoLEP, ThuLEP and ThuFLEP are safe and effective LEP methods with improvement in functional parameters and low complication rates. Similar results in terms of functional outcomes and complications clearly show that these surgeries are alternatives to each other for the patients with BPO. Experts' opinions, practices and enucleation techniques should also be taken into consideration when choosing a laser for BPO surgery.

Thulium Fiber Versus Holmium:Yttrium-aluminum-garnet Laser for Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Thulium fiber laser (TFL) emerged as a competitor of holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser for anatomic enucleation of the prostate (AEEP) in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) related to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). The aim was to compare the surgical outcomes of Ho:YAG and TFL for AEEP. METHODS: A literature search was conducted to identify reports published from inception until January 2024. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. The coprimary outcomes were the postoperative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS-Quality of Life (IPSS-QoL), and peak urinary flow (Qmax). KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Five studies met our inclusion criteria, and data from 1287 and 1555 patients who underwent AEEP with Ho:YAG (holmium laser enucleation of the prostate [HoLEP]) and TFL (thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate [ThuFLEP]), respectively, were reviewed. ThuFLEP was associated with a better IPSS at 3 mo even if the difference was not clinically significant (mean difference [MD] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29-0.88; p < 0.001). No difference was found for IPSS at 6-12 mo (p = 0.9), and IPSS-QoL at 3 mo (p = 0.9) and 6-12 mo (p = 0.2). HoLEP was associated with a better Qmax at 3 mo (MD 1.41 ml/s, 95% CI: 0.51-2.30; p = 0.002) and ThuFLEP at 6-12 mo (MD -2.61 ml/s, 95% CI: -4.68 to 0.59; p = 0.01), but the differences were not clinically significant. No difference was found in the major (p = 0.3) and overall (p = 0.3) complication rates. HoLEP was associated with shorter enucleation (MD -11.86, 95% CI: -22.36 to 1.36; p = 0.03) but not total operative time (p = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The present review provides the most updated evidence on the impact of Ho:YAG and TFL in AEEP, demonstrating that these two energy sources are effective in relieving bothersome LUTS in men with BPO. PATIENT SUMMARY: Thulium fiber laser is a new energy source that can be used safely for performing endoscopic enucleation of the prostate in men with bothersome symptoms associated with benign prostatic enlargement.

Modified holmium laser enucleation for benign prostatic obstruction to preserve sexual and ejaculatory function.

INTRODUCTION: To report ejaculatory and urinary results in patients who underwent holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) with selective laser enucleation of the median lobe (MLHoLEP). METHODS: Patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)/benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) who underwent MLHoLEP to preserve ejaculatory function in a single center were retrospectively identified. Urinary function was assessed using International Prostate Score Symptom (IPSS), IPSS-Quality of Life index (IPSS-QoL), peak urinary flow (Qmax) and postvoid residual (PVR). Erectile function was assessed using International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5). In patients with preoperative antegrade ejaculation, retrograde ejaculation was routinely screened at each follow-up visit. Sexual and urinary functions at 3 and 12 months were compared with baseline values. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients met our inclusion criteria. A significant improvement in the IPSS, IPSS-QoL, PVR and Qmax was found at 3 and 12 months, compared with baseline (all P<0.05). Eight patients (14.5%) required surgical reintervention due to persistant LUTS/BPO. No significant changes in the erectile function were found at 3 (P=0.3) and 12 months (P>0.9). In patients with preoperative antegrade ejaculation (n=32), only four cases of de novo retrograde ejaculation were recorded postoperatively. CONCLUSION: MLHoLEP represents a new alternative for men with LUTS/BPO who wish to preserve their ejaculatory function. Patients should be aware that improvement in urinary function may be inferior to the traditional technique, with a higher reintervention rate due to persistent LUTS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Grade 4.

Impact of age and anterior fibromuscular stroma preservation on post-enucleation voided volume.

PURPOSE: This study is centered on the critical role of anterior fibromuscular stroma (AFS) preservation in prostate enucleation, an emerging strategy aimed at minimizing postoperative urinary incontinence-a common concern in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) surgeries. By focusing on postoperative voiding volumes (VV), our research investigates the efficacy of AFS preservation. This approach, distinct in its methodology, is hypothesized to improve urinary function post-surgery, thereby offering a potentially significant advancement in BPH surgical treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted, comparing patients who underwent prostate enucleation in 2017 without intentional AFS preservation to those in 2019 with this technique. We examined variables including age, BMI, diabetes, hypertension, and preoperative VV to assess their effect on post-catheter removal VV. The study's methodology includes a thorough review of the primary statistical analysis methods employed. RESULTS: Our analysis indicates that while the 2017 and 2019 cohorts were similar in most preoperative parameters, the 2019 group that underwent AFS-preserved surgery showed a significant improvement in postoperative VVs. This was less pronounced in the patient group aged over 70, underscoring the importance of this demographic in our study. CONCLUSIONS: The study concludes that intentional preservation of AFS during prostate enucleation positively impacts early postoperative VVs, with limited improvement in older patients. These findings highlight the potential of AFS preservation not only in enhancing urinary outcomes post-surgery but also in shaping future BPH surgical procedures and research directions.

Functional Outcome and Safety of Endoscopic Treatment Options for Benign Prostatic Obstruction (BPO) in Patients ≥ 75 Years of Age.

Background: The selection of suitable patients for the surgical treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) is a challenge in persons ≥75 years of age. Methods: After a systematic literature search of PubMed, 22 articles were included in this review. Clinical and functional parameters were evaluated statistically. Results: The mean age of the patients was ≥79 years. The mean duration of postoperative catheterization ranged between 2 (d) (ThuLEP, thulium laser enucleation of the prostate) and 4.4 days (TURP, transurethral resection of the prostate). Complication rates ranged between 6% (HoLAP, holmium laser ablation of the prostate) and 34% (PVP, photoselective vaporization of the prostate); the maximum rate of severe complications was 4% (TURP). The mean postoperative maximal urinary flow (Qmax) in mL/sec. ranged between 12.9 mL/sec. (HoLAP) and 19.8 mL/sec (Hol-TUIP, holmium laser transurethral incision of the prostate). The mean quality of life (QoL) score fell from 4.7 ± 0.9 to 1.8 ± 0.7 (HoLEP), from 4.1 ± 0.4 to 1.9 ± 0.8 (PVP), from 5.1 ± 0.2 to 2.1 ± 0.2 (TURP), and from 4 to 1 (ThuVEP, thulium laser vapoenucleation of the prostate). Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) revealed a positive linear correlation between age and inferior functional outcome (higher postoperative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) [r = 0.4175]), higher overall complication rates (r = 0.5432), and blood transfusions (r = 0.4474) across all surgical techniques. Conclusions: This meta-analysis provides the summary estimates for perioperative and postoperative functional outcome and safety of endoscopic treatment options for BPO in patients ≥ 75 years of age. Of particular importance is that all surgical techniques significantly improve the postoperative quality of life of patients in this age group compared to their preoperative quality of life.

Transperineal laser ablation as treatment for benign prostatic obstruction: Safety, feasibility and functional outcomes-A pilot study.

Background: Standard surgical treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) requires anaesthesia and hospitalization. Transperineal laser ablation (TPLA) is a novel minimally invasive treatment for BPO, which has been performed using local anaesthetics and conscious sedation. Objectives: The aim of this study is to assess safety, feasibility and functional outcomes of TPLA for the treatment of LUTS in men fit also for standard surgery. Methods: This prospective, multicentre, interventional pilot study included 20 patients. Eligible patients were men ≥40 years of age, with urodynamically proven bladder outlet obstruction, a peak urinary flow of 5-15 mL/s and a prostate volume of 30-120 cc. All subjects underwent Soractelite™ TPLA using the Echolaser® X4 system. Two to four fibres were placed in the prostate, whereafter laser light induced coagulative necrosis. Twelve months of follow-up included uroflowmetry, an ultrasound of the prostate and PROMs (IPSS and IIEF). Results: Twenty patients were treated with TPLA using local anaesthetics and optional sedation. Sixteen patients were treated in an outpatient setting, using only local anaesthetics in 12 of them; four were treated in the operating room, whereof two under general anaesthesia. No device related adverse events occurred, nor did any grade ≥3 adverse events during follow-up. Post-TPLA, 10 men continued spontaneous voiding, and 10 men developed a urinary retention treated by a temporary indwelling catheter for 15.2 ± 3.5 days. At 12 months, Qmax improved from 9.7 ± 3.5 to 14.9 ± 6.0 (p = 0.015), IPSS improved from 21.3 ± 5.2 to 10.9 ± 5.5 (p < 0.0001), QoL improved from 4.9 ± 0.9 to 1.9 ± 1.1 (p < 0.0001), IIEF-15 total score remained stable and 11/13 patients (85%) preserved antegrade ejaculation. Conclusions: TPLA is a safe and feasible treatment for men with LUTS due to BPO. TPLA can be performed in an outpatient setting under only local anaesthetics. Functional and quality of life outcomes improved significantly at 12 months, and erectile function remained stable.

Evaluation of new treatments for benign prostatic obstruction: ICI-RS 2023.

AIMS: To address how invasive therapies for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) have been evaluated, what their effect is on BPO, if they can prevent progression to BPO and how new therapies need to be evaluated before implementation into clinical practice. METHODS: The think tank conducted a literature review and looked at the previous and current American Urological Association, European Association of Urology and the International Consultation on Urological Diseases guidelines to see what procedures have been used to treat BPO. They then assessed whether trials have been conducted before implementation of the procedures and whether they have been compared to a "gold" standard treatment. The use of urodynamics has also been addressed in the think tank in relation the clinical trials as well as terminology. RESULTS: Guidelines vary in the use of terminology when it comes to BPO with some continuing to use the term benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). There are several procedures for example, TUNA, which have become obsolete although continues to be mentioned in the guidelines until recently. Majority of procedures have been introduced without comparing to "gold" standard treatment and without any long-term data. There continues to be many unknowns with regard to the success of some of the BPO procedures and why some of the adverse events develop. CONCLUSION: There needs to be more robust long-term clinical trials conducted of new BPO therapies, with men who have both lower urinary tract symptoms and urinary retention, before introduction into clinical practice.

Unveiling prostatic inflammation to optimize management of lower urinary tract symptoms: a discussion with experts.

Benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) and associated lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are common conditions in men, which increase in frequency and severity with age, and have a significant impact on quality of life. Chronic prostatic inflammation is increasingly being recognized as a key component of BPO. This may lead to new targets for the management of BPO/LUTS. This podcast is based on presentations from a symposium titled 'Unveiling prostatic inflammation to optimize LUTS management' held at the European Association of Urology 2023 Congress. The presenters outline evidence of a role for prostatic inflammation in the development and progression of BPO/LUTS, approaches to the identification of biomarkers of inflammation, and the implications of prostatic inflammation for the optimal management of BPO/LUTS.

New therapeutic targets to prevent benign prostatic enlargement and symptomatic progression to benign prostatic obstruction-ICI-RS 2023.

AIMS: Benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) can impact lower urinary tract function due to its potential progression to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). Treatment options include removal of the obstruction by surgery or through use of therapeutics designed to slow growth or reduce tissue stress imposed by muscular stromal components. Inflammation and development of fibrosis can also raise intrinsic tissue stress within the gland, further impacting obstruction. Outflow tract obstruction can also impact emission and ejaculation if the obstruction persists. METHODS: This review summarizes an ICI-RS think tank considering novel drug treatments that might address BPO caused by progressive development of BPE, as well as manage decompensation changes to bladder function. RESULTS: Topics included recent advances in our understanding of pathological changes occurring to the prostate and other lower urinary tract tissues during progressive development of BPE, and how prevention or reversal might benefit from the identification of novel drug targets. These included contractile properties of prostatic tissues, the impact of BPE and its effects on bladder function, the deposition of intramural fibrotic tissue with protracted BPO, the role of inflammation in the development of BPE and its progression to BPO. In particular, we discussed current therapeutic options for treating BPE/BPO, and new therapeutic targets, what they treat and their advantage over current medications. CONCLUSION: Several new drug targets were identified, including soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC), the receptor for nitric oxide (NO•), and sGC activators that promotes sGC-mediated cGMP production when sGC is inactivated and unresponsive to NO•.

[Surgical treatment options of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic obstruction : The German S2e guideline 2023-part 3]. / Operative Therapie des benignen Prostatasyndroms ­ klassische Desobstruktion : Die deutsche S2e-Leitlinie 2023 ­ Teil 3.

BACKGROUND: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) are one of the most common diagnoses in clinical practice. Bothersome LUTS impact considerably quality of life of men and may cause severe complications without treatment. According to the diagnostic assessment every patient should be treated with an adequate therapy. Management comprises a conservative approach, medication, novel minimally invasive options, and surgical procedures with the aim to remove the obstructing adenoma. The German guideline panel has updated the German guidelines on diagnostic evaluation and management of LUTS due to BPO. OBJECTIVES: Evidence-based recommendations of surgical treatment options of LUTS due to BPO are evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chapters 11.1.1 and 11.2 of the updated German S2e guideline on the management of LUTS due to BPO are summarized as a review article. RESULTS: A treatment algorithm based on current evidence has been proposed. It is considered to provide guidance for the selection of the best procedure according to the needs of the patient. Anatomic features of the prostate, the patients' morbidity, and the preservation of ejaculatory function are taken into account for the choice of the best procedures. These surgical options can be divided into techniques with direct, delayed or no removal of the adenoma, procedures with suprapubic access, and embolizing approaches. CONCLUSIONS: The updated German S2e guideline on the management of LUTS due to BPO provides evidence-based recommendations for the selection of the best procedure according to the needs of the individual patient.

Emerging Technologies for the Surgical Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Obstruction. A Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: Surgical management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)/benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) aims at ablating prostate adenoma by resection, enucleation, or vaporisation. Apart from established ablation modes according to the European Association of Urology guidelines, various technologies have emerged as safe/effective alternatives but remain under investigation. OBJECTIVE: To explore short-term benefits/harms of emerging technologies for surgical management of LUTS/BPO. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL via Ovid up to June 18, 2022. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) exploring aquablation, prostatic arterial embolisation (PAE), Rezum, prostatic urethral lift (PUL), and temporary implantable nitinol device (iTIND) versus sham/transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We included ten RCTs (1108 men). Aquablation versus TURP: insignificant change in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS; mean difference [MD] 0.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.44 to 2.44), quality of life (QoL; MD 0.30, 95% CI -0.81 to 0.21), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax; MD -0.30, 95% CI -3.71 to 3.11), retreatment (risk ratio [RR] 0.18, 95% CI 0.02-1.66), and urinary incontinence (UI; RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.26-1.95). PAE versus monopolar TURP (M-TURP): insignificant change in IPSS (MD 3.33, 95% CI -28.39 to 35.05), QoL (MD 0.12, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.54), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5; MD 3.07, 95% CI -1.78 to 7.92), and UI (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.01-2.86), and significant change in Qmax (MD -9.52, 95% CI -14.04 to -5.0), favouring M-TURP. PAE versus bipolar TURP: insignificant change in IPSS (MD -2.80, 95% CI -6.61 to 1.01), QoL (MD -0.69, 95% CI -1.46 to 0.08), Qmax (MD -3.51, 95% CI -8.08 to 1.06), UI (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.01-2.51), and retreatment (RR 1.91, 95% CI 0.19-19.63). PUL versus TURP: insignificant change in QoL (MD 0.40, 95% CI -0.29 to 1.09), UI (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-1.05), and retreatment (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.12-1.86), and significant change in IPSS (MD 3.40, 95% CI 0.22-6.58), and IIEF-5 (MD 3.00, 95% CI 0.41-5.59) and Qmax (MD -9.60, 95% CI -13.44 to -5.76), favouring PUL and TURP, respectively. Rezum and iTIND have not been evaluated in RCTs against TURP to date. CONCLUSIONS: Supporting evidence for clinical use of aquablation, PAE, PUL, Rezum, and iTIND is very limited. Benefits/harms should be investigated further in high-quality RCTs. PATIENT SUMMARY: This review summarises the evidence for the clinical use of aquablation, prostatic arterial embolisation (PAE), prostatic urethral lift (PUL), Rezum, and temporary implantable nitinol device (iTIND) to manage lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction. The supporting evidence for the clinical usage of aquablation, PAE, PUL, Rezum, and iTIND is very limited. Benefits and harms should be investigated further in high-quality randomised controlled trials.

Robotic simple prostatectomy vs HOLEP, a 'multi single-center' experiences comparison.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare peri-operative and mid-term outcomes of patients who underwent robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) vs holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP). RASP and HOLEP are the treatments of choice for men with symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) and a prostate ≥80 g, achieving comparable short and mid-term efficacy. No randomized controlled studies have proved the superiority of one technique over the other. Material and methods: The prospectively maintained databases of the participating institutions were queried for patients with a prostate volume (PV) ≥80 g, who underwent surgery for BPO between 2011 and 2021. The study population was divided into two subgroups based on surgical approach. Demographics, baseline characteristics, and 12 months outcomes were compared between groups: χ2 and Student t-tests were used for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. The Trifecta composite outcome (post-operative Q-max >15 ml/sec, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) <8 and absence of complications) was used to define surgical quality and the two groups were compared accordingly. Logistic regression analyses investigated predictors of Trifecta achievement. Results: We included 97 patients with comparable pre-operative features (all p >0.30): 43 underwent RASP, 54 HOLEP. Median PV was 102 g (IQR 89-120) and Q-max was 7.2 ml/s (IQR 5.4-9.0). The Trifecta rate was 43% overall, higher in the RASP subgroup (56% vs 33%; p = 0.02). The endoscopic approach was its only independent predictor (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.28-0.88; p = 0.016). Conclusions: At univariable regression analysis, surgical approach was the only independent predictor of Trifecta achievement, which was significantly higher in the RASP group compared to HOLEP.

Australian surgical revision rate for benign prostatic obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rate of revision surgery following commonly performed procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is hyperplasia of both glandular and stromal components of prostate especially in periurethral transitional gland, using real-world data from Medicare Australia. METHODS: Prospection is a Healthcare Data Analytics firm that has negotiated access with the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) to provide longitudinal data on the use of specific procedural item codes. We identified patients over the age of 40 years who had undergone primary transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP) or photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) between 2005 and 2010 using MBS item numbers 37203, 37207 and 36854, respectively. Using longitudinal MBS data, primary outcomes included need for revision surgery at 5-years follow-up (2015). The release of these data was approved by Medicare Australia upon application. Data analysis was conducted using chi-squared tests and statistical significance was defined at P < 0.05. RESULTS: The distribution of primary surgical procedures performed between 2005 and 2010 was: TURP 5579 (90%), TUIP 345 (6%) and PVP 258 (4%). TURP was also the most prevalent procedure for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with BPH requiring revision surgery (75%). At 5-year follow-up the rate of revision surgery for TURP (573/5579), TUIP (47/345) and PVP (30/258) was 10.3%, 13.6% and 11.6%, respectively. The difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.12). There was no significant change (P = 0.59) observed over the years in number of men requiring revision surgery. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that TURP and PVP have a similar durability after 5 years of follow-up.

Ejaculatory function following transperineal laser ablation vs TURP for benign prostatic obstruction: a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability of transperineal interstitial laser ablation of the prostate (TPLA) in preserving antegrade ejaculation compared to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this single-centre, prospective, randomized, open-label study, consecutive patients with indication for surgical treatment for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) were enrolled between January 2020 and September 2021 (NCT04781049). Patients were randomized to one of two treatment arms: Group A: TPLA (experimental group) and Group B: TURP (reference standard group). The primary endpoint was change in ejaculatory function (assessed by the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire - Ejaculatory function domain [EJ-MSHQ]) at 1 month after surgery. Secondary endpoints included comparison of visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, changes in sexual function (assessed using the five-item International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF-5]), change in International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS], change in quality of life score, and maximum urinary flow rate [Qmax ] improvement at 1-6 months, as appropriate. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (26 TPLA vs 25 TURP) were analysed. No differences in the perception of pain assessed by VAS and no differences in IIEF-5 score were found between the groups. The distribution of ejaculatory function assessed by the EJ-MSHQ remained unmodified after TPLA (P = 0.2), while a median 30% decrease in EJ-MSHQ score was observed after TURP (P = 0.01). Absence of antegrade ejaculation was reported in one patient in the TPLA group (vs 18 patients in the TURP group). A statistically significant difference between the treatment groups was found in terms of postoperative Qmax (TPLA vs TURP: 15.2 [interquartile range 13.5-18.3] mL/s vs 26.0 [interquartile range 22.0-48.0] mL/s; P < 0.001). Both treatments significantly improved Qmax , with a mean 23.9 mL/s improvement after TURP (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.1-30.7) vs 6.0 mL/s after TPLA (95% CI 5.0-7.0), and IPSS, with a mean decrease of 11.6 (95% CI 9.7-13.5) vs 5.8 after TPLA (95% CI.2-9.6) with respect to baseline. CONCLUSION: In our study, TPLA preserved ejaculatory function in 96% of cases in addition to providing significant relief from BPO.

Do Patients Treated with Water Vapor Therapy and Meeting Randomized Clinical Trial Criteria Have Better Urinary and Sexual Outcomes Than an Unselected Cohort?

Introduction: Water vapor intraprostatic injection (Rezum procedure) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is one of the most promising minimally invasive surgical treatments. Five-year outcomes from the multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated significant and durable urinary and sexual function results in selected patients. We compared the sexual and urinary outcomes of this procedure in patients satisfying inclusion criteria of the RCT with unselected patients. Materials and Methods: We prospectively followed all patients with symptomatic BPH who underwent Rezum therapy at eight institutions and analyzed the functional results. Patients were divided into two groups: patients who matched the 5-year RCT inclusion criteria (Group A) and patients who did not (Group B). The pre- and postoperative data, complications, presence of antegrade ejaculation, and urinary and sexual outcomes were periodically recorded. Results: A total of 426 patients were eligible for the study (232 in Group A and 194 in Group B). Patients in Group B had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score, prostate volume, and postvoid residual measurement. No difference was found in terms of preoperative International Prostate Symptom Score, International Index of Erectile Function, maximum urinary flow, and prostate-specific antigen. Longer operative time and higher number of vapor injections were required in Group B, with no differences in hospital stay, injection density, and complication rates. All the urinary and sexual outcomes improved with no differences between the two groups. The reintervention rate at the latest follow-up visit was 2.6% in Group A and 3.1% in Group B. Conclusions: In our large multicenter series, water vapor intraprostatic injections showed a safe and effective profile regardless of the prostate size, presence of indwelling catheter, antiplatelet/anticoagulant medications, and patients' comorbidities.