Forty years of human G-CSF: A short history in time.

Human G-CSF was identified in 1984 at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre, New York. Based on these findings, recombinant G-CSF was developed by Amgen, Thousand Oaks. In 1987, clinical trials began using recombinant G-CSF in cancer patients following chemotherapy to reduce the duration of neutropenia and in patients with congenital neutropenia (CN) to increase the number of neutrophils. It has changed the quality of life for many cancer patients and saved the lives of many patients with (CN).

Neutropenic Enterocolitis in a Metastatic Seminoma Patient With Streptococcus gallolyticus Bacteremia.

Neutropenic enterocolitis (NEC), also referred to as typhlitis, is a condition associated with a high mortality risk and primarily manifests in immunocompromised patients. It is characterized by ulceration, edema, and hemorrhage affecting the bowel wall. The underlying cause of NEC is postulated as an immunocompromised condition that facilitates bacterial infiltration through compromised bowel mucosa. The high mortality rate is attributable to bowel necrosis, culminating in perforation and sepsis. This report describes a case involving a patient with metastatic seminoma who exhibited seizure-like activity, fever, Streptococcus gallolyticus bacteremia, and NEC. The patient underwent treatment involving broad-spectrum antibiotics and filgrastim. The patient's neutropenia resolved leading to discharge on oral antibiotics. The case reported is unique, as it links NEC to Streptococcus gallolyticus and seminoma. Streptococcus gallolyticus has not been previously associated with NEC.

Filgrastim biosimilar (EP2006): A review of 15 years' post-approval evidence.

Filgrastim is approved for several indications, including reduction of the incidence and duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and for stem cell mobilization. The filgrastim biosimilar, EP2006, has been available in Europe since 2009, and in the United States since 2015. In this time, preclinical and clinical data used to support the approval of EP2006 have been published. These data established the biosimilarity of EP2006 to reference filgrastim in terms of structure, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity. Additional real-world evidence studies have also demonstrated equivalent efficacy and safety of EP2006 compared with reference filgrastim, both in the reduction of neutropenia and in stem cell mobilization in clinical practice. This review summarizes these preclinical, clinical, and real-world data, as well as the available cost-effectiveness data, for EP2006 since its approval 15 years ago.

Isolated Neutropenia Due to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

In this article, we explore the correlation between immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and neutropenia. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer treatment and management by maximizing the innate abilities of the immune system. However, this therapeutic potential is accompanied by a range of immune-related adverse effects (irAEs), including neutropenia, which is a rare but potentially life-threatening side effect of this mode of cancer treatment. Through an in-depth analysis of various case reports, we have compiled a detailed table summarizing the occurrences of neutropenia associated with different ICIs, the grades of neutropenia, treatments used, and patient outcomes. Management of neutropenia must include an approach based on early diagnosis of the condition and a treatment based on its severity. This review discusses different therapeutic interventions, ranging from the administration of corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) to the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) and, in very severe cases, a stem cell transplant. We have also enlisted salient side effects caused by these interventions. Our findings emphasize that while neutropenia is a relatively rare adverse effect of ICIs, its severity necessitates increased awareness among healthcare professionals. As ICIs continue to be seen as an integral component of cancer therapy, a comprehensive understanding of neutropenia as a side effect and its management is critical for optimizing patient outcomes. A crucial purpose of this review is to highlight the need to achieve a balance between acquiring the therapeutic benefits of various treatment strategies for irAEs and considering their potential side effects, especially with the use of steroids. Achieving this equilibrium is very important in optimizing patient care during immunotherapy, as these irAE management options can both mitigate the neutropenia triggered by ICIs and potentially give rise to secondary complications. Therefore, a careful assessment of the risks and benefits associated with each treatment approach is essential in tailoring irAE management.

Classification of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenic Episodes Into One of the Three Febrile Neutropenic Syndromes.

Introduction Febrile neutropenia is a commonly encountered medical emergency in patients undergoing cancer treatment and can delay and modify the course of treatment and even lead to dire outcomes, including death. The cause of fever in a post-chemotherapy-induced neutropenic patient can be confusing to treating physicians. A review of the literature demonstrated that blood culture results could determine the cause of febrile neutropenia in only approximately 10% to 25% of patients. The objective of our study was to measure the incidence of positive blood cultures, urine cultures, and other body fluid cultures resulting in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and further classify fever episodes into three neutropenic fever syndromes, such as microbiologically documented, clinically suspected, or unknown causes of fever, respectively. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study on 399 chemotherapy-induced neutropenic fever episodes with the aim of classifying them into one of the three neutropenic syndromes. We tried to document the cause of the fever in these patients. We also noted the type of cancer treatment regimen they were on and correlated their clinical profile with their body fluid cultures, including blood cultures, urine cultures, and other body fluid cultures. We then categorized each fever episode into one of three neutropenic syndromes. Results We studied 399 febrile neutropenic episodes. We were able to microbiologically document the cause of fever in 39% of the cases, and we obtained growth in 51 out of 399 blood cultures (13%), which was comparable to the available literature, and urine culture showed growth in 62 out of 399 cultures (16%), while other body cultures such as pus culture, bile culture, and bronchioalveolar lavage cultures collectively showed growth in 42 out of 399 episodes (10%). The most common bacteria isolated in both blood and urine cultures were Escherichia coli. Cumulatively, including blood, urine, and body fluid cultures, we were able to classify 39% (155 out of 399 cases) of febrile neutropenic episodes as microbiologically documented. The cause of fever was clinically suspected by means of careful history taking and an extensive physical examination in 31% (125 out of 399) without growth evidence in blood cultures, urine cultures, or any other body fluid culture. The cause of fever remained unknown in 119 cases (30%) of patients and was classified under the unknown cause of fever. Conclusions We conclude by stating that the study of fever in a neutropenic patient should include a thorough history and clinical evaluation of blood, urine, and other body fluid cultures instead of solely relying on blood culture results. We recommend further classifying patients into one of the three neutropenic fever syndromes, such as those that are microbiologically documented, clinically suspected, or unknown. Our blood cultures were able to give us a 13% positivity rate, whereas microbiologically, we were able to isolate an organism likely causing fever in 39% of patients. The cause of fever was suspected clinically in 31% of patients, but we were unsuccessful in microbiologically documenting any culture growth in blood, urine, or any other body fluid culture. The cause of fever remained a mystery and unknown to us without any microbiological or clinical cues in 119 cases (30%) of febrile neutropenic episodes.

[Consensus on clinical diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in China (2023 edition)].

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) is a common hematological adverse events and dose-limiting toxicities of chemotherapy. CIN may lead to dose reduction and delay of chemotherapeutic agents, febrile neutropenia and severe infection, which results in increased treatment cost, reduced efficacy of chemotherapy, and even life-threatening morbidities. Assessment of risk of CIN, early detection of FN and infection, and proper prevention and treatment play a crucial role in reducing the occurrence of CIN-related morbidities, improving patient treatment safety and anticancer efficacy. Based on evidence and expert opinion, the expert committee of Chinese Anti-Cancer Association issued "the consensus on diagnosis and treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in China (2023 edition)", which is an update version of the 2019 edition, aiming to provide reference for the diagnosis and treatment of CIN for Chinese oncologists.

Efficacy and safety of PEG-rhG-CSF versus rhG-CSF in preventing chemotherapy-induced-neutropenia in early-stage breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical value of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) and pegylated rhG-CSF(PEG-rhG-CSF) in early-stage breast cancer (EBC) patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, compare the efficacy of PEG-rhG-CSF with different dose and explore the timing of rhG-CSF rescue treatment. METHODS: Patients in two PEG-rhG-CSF subgroups were given 3 mg or 6 mg PEG-rhG-CSF within 24 ~ 48 h after chemotherapy for preventing myelosuppression, while patients in the rhG-CSF group were given rhG-CSF. Observation indicators include the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) and grade 3/4 chemotherapy-induced-neutropenia (CIN), the overall levels and nadir values of white blood cells (WBC) and absolute neutrophil count (ANC), comparison of WBC and ANC curves over time, the incidence of CIN-related complications, the incidence of adverse events in each group and the timing of rescue treatment for rhG-CSF. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the incidence of FN in the first cycle among the groups (P = 0.203). But the incidence of ≥ 3 grade CIN in two PEG-rhG-CSF subgroups was significantly lower than that in the rhG-CSF group (P < 0.001). The overall WBC and ANC levels in the PEG-rhG-CSF group were significantly higher than those in the rhG-CSF group (P < 0.001). In terms of CIN-related complications, less chemotherapy delay rate (1.1 vs. 7.5%, P = 0.092), less dose reduction rate (6.9 vs. 7.5%, P = 1.000), less antibiotic use rate (3.4 vs. 17.5%, P = 0.011) and less proportion of rhG-CSF rescue therapy (24.1 vs. 85.0%, P < 0.001) in the PEG-rhG-CSF group, and there were no significant differences between PEG-rhG-CSF subgroups. In the incidence of adverse events among the groups, there were no statistical differences. All patients undergoing rhG-CSF rescue treatment were mainly 4 grade (63.6%) and 3 grade (25.5%) CIN, and 10.9% of patients with 1 ~ 2 grade CIN who had high infection risk or had been infected. CONCLUSION: PEG-rhG-CSF has better efficacy and equal tolerance compared with rhG-CSF in preventing CIN in EBC patients receiving EC regimen. Moreover, a half-dose 3 mg PEG-rhG-CSF also had good efficacy. Last, patients with ≥ 3 grade CIN and others who have been assessed to be at high risk of infection or have co-infection should consider rhG-CSF or even antibiotic rescue treatment.

Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia as a Prognostic Factor in Patients With Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the prognostic value of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) in epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) treated with primary surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: The records of primary EOC treated between Jan 1st 2002 and Dec 31st 2016 were reviewed according to the including and excluding criteria. CIN was defined as absolute neutrophil count (ANC) after chemotherapy <2.0 × 109/L. Patients with CIN were further divided into mild and severe CIN (ANC <1.0 × 109/L), early-onset and late-onset (>3 cycles) CIN. Clinical characteristic was compared by chi-square test. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis, univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. RESULTS: Among 735 EOC patients enrolled, no significant differences of the prognosis were found between patients with and without CIN, early and late CIN, mild and severe CIN. However, Kaplan-Meier curve (65 vs 42 months for CIN vs non-CIN, P = .007) and Cox regression analysis (HR 1.499, 95% CI 1.142-1.966; P = .004) both revealed that CIN was significantly related with better OS in advanced EOC patients, but not for PFS. So, subgroup analysis was further conducted and date suggested that CIN was an independent predictor of better survival in advanced EOC with suboptimal surgery (PFS: 18 vs 14 months, P = .013, HR 1.526, 95% CI 1.072-2.171, P = .019; OS: 37 vs 27 months, P = .013, HR 1.455, 95% CI 1.004-2.108; P = .048). CONCLUSIONS: CIN might be used as an independent prognostic indicator of advanced EOC, especially for those patients with suboptimal surgery.

Outcome and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Long-acting G-CSF as Primary Prophylaxis of Neutropenia Induced by Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients, From a Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: This retrospective analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor as primary prophylaxis of neutropenia caused by chemotherapy for breast cancer. METHODS: Patients with breast cancer who received long- or short-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor as primary prophylaxis of neutropenia were enrolled in this study, and incidences of neutropenia were compared between two groups. A decision-analytic and a Markov model were used to compare the health benefits and costs of utilizing long- vs short-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor as the primary prophylaxis from the perspective of the Chinese health service system. Subsequently, one-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated in baseline and sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Patients receiving long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor as the primary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia experienced a significant lower incidence of this adverse event, compared with the short-acting one for 2 to 7 days. The outcomes of baseline analysis indicated that long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor had a gain of 0.08 quality-adjusted life years and costed $149 more than the short-acting one, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $1792 per quality-adjusted life year. The sensitivity analysis proved the stability of our models and economic efficiency of long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor as primary prophylaxis of neutropenia experienced lower risk of this event compared with those underusing short-acting one. The long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor may be a more cost-effective strategy for primary prophylaxis of neutropenia than short-acting one, considering the Chinese willingness-to-pay threshold of $12158.6 per quality-adjusted life year.

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia as a prognostic factor in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) is a dose-limiting factor for cytotoxic chemotherapy, but recently, it was suggested that CIN contributes to prolonged survival. In this study, we examined the association between severe CIN and survival and determined whether CIN affected survival in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). METHODS: The medical records from 214 patients with ES-SCLC treated with etoposide or irinotecan in combination with cisplatin (EP/IP) between 2012 and 2016 were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Landmark analysis was performed at the end of cycle 4, and the relationship between severe CIN and survival was determined by a log-rank test. In addition, a multivariate analysis using the COX proportional hazard model was performed to identify independent predictive factors. The Landmark analysis included 102 patients in the IP group and 47 patients in the EP group. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between grades 0-3 and grade 4 neutropenia and overall survival (OS) in the EP group (P = 0.57). Contrariwise, for the IP patients, the median OS was 444 days for grades 0-3 and 633 days for grade 4 neutropenia, which was significantly longer for patients who developed grade 4 neutropenia (P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis adjusted for potential factors revealed that the development of grade 4 CIN was identified as a significant predictor of longer OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.28-0.87, P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: The results indicated that the development of severe CIN with IP therapy is associated with prolonged OS.

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia among breast Cancer patients in a tertiary care hospital: Risk and consequences.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify the risk factors that may predispose breast cancer patients to Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and its associated complications for the years 2018 and 2020. CIN is an established complication of breast cancer treatment. Clinical Pharmacists can play an important role in the treatment of CIN through involvement in risk assessment to identify patients for oral antimicrobial therapy, drug therapy monitoring, and development of suitable guidelines or policies. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective study was performed by collecting data of 72 breast cancer patients for the last two years from department of Medical Oncology in a tertiary care hospital. RESULTS: The overall occurrence of CIN was 59.7% in our study population. Out of 72 patients studied, 43 patients were found to be neutropenic. Using Pearson Chi square test, chemotherapy-induced neutropenia was associated with older age (over 60 y) (p < 0.038), diabetes mellitus (p < 0.050), tumour stage IIIa (p < 0.024), AC (p < 0.051) and taxane chemotherapy regimens (p < 0.041). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 37.28% of patients and the incidence of infection-related mortality [severe septicaemia] was 3.38%. CONCLUSION: The incorporation of clinical pharmacist must be brought into practice in our country for providing proper guidance to the patient on CIN and its complications. By identifying risk factors for neutropenia, the safe management of CIN may be possible in patients with breast cancer.

Efficacy of same-day versus next-day administration of pegfilgrastim for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients receiving dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: A retrospective multi-site analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Administering pegfilgrastim on the same day as chemotherapy can improve patient satisfaction through convenience and may increase the utilization of cost-effective biosimilars compared to next-day administration, but the effect on clinical outcomes with commonly used breast cancer regimens is unclear. METHODS: This multi-site, retrospective cohort study included breast cancer patients age 18 years or older who received dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (ddAC) and pegfilgrastim between 1 June 2016 and 31 May 2020. Pegfilgrastim was given on the same day as chemotherapy at one site and the day after chemotherapy at the other two sites. The primary endpoint compared the incidence of febrile neutropenia associated with pegfilgrastim administration timing. RESULTS: A total of 360 patients were reviewed (146 same-day administration and 214 next-day administration). In the same-day group 36 patients (24.6%) developed FN compared to 25 patients (11.7%) in the next-day group (p = 0.002). Same-day administration also significantly increased the incidences of additional acute care visits (11.6% vs 2.8%, p = 0.0016), grade ≥ 3 neutropenia (38.4% vs 13.6%, p < 0.0001), chemotherapy dose reductions (21.2% vs 6.1%, p < 0.0001), and antibiotic use (26.7% vs 12.6%, p = 0.001). Same-day administration did not significantly increase the rate of hospitalization (15% vs 11.2%, p = 0.36) and delay of next chemotherapy cycle by ≥1 day (8.2% vs 6.1%, p = 0.57) due to neutropenic complications. CONCLUSIONS: Administering pegfilgrastim on the same day as ddAC led to a significant increase in neutropenic complications. This study confirms the need to administer pegfilgrastim the day after chemotherapy in breast cancer patients receiving ddAC.

Nurses' knowledge of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and its management: a cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) is a serious and potentially life-threatening condition that is associated with high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess nurses' level of knowledge of CIN and its association with socio-demographic factors. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey design was used. RESULTS: Participants had a mean age of 34.1 years (SD = 7.1 years) and were predominantly female (78%) and with a bachelor's degree in nursing (95.6%). The nurses had a moderate level of knowledge about neutropenia and its management (mean total score 16.3 out of 30, SD = 3.7). Those who had a post-graduate degree (P = .048), had received an oncology educational course (P = .011), had attended a course on neutropenia (P = .007), who were working in an oncology unit (P = .002), and had more oncology experience (P = 001) were more likely to have a higher level of knowledge of CIN and its management compared to their other counterparts. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of a moderate level of knowledge of CIN among nurses, the findings call for the need for further education and training. As a long-term plan, this might be accomplished by encouraging nurses to pursue post-graduate education or oncology-specialized certification and supporting them with scholarship grants. However, deliberate plans for short courses, training and workshops on oncology or CIN are other choices with a more immediate impact on nurses' knowledge and clinical practice. Finally, integrating oncology nursing education within nursing curricula is urgently needed.

Evidence Generation of Standard Nursing Protocol on Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia Among Oncology Nurses.

Background Chemotherapy uses anti-neoplastic agents, the drugs used to treat malignancies. Neutropenia is associated with cytotoxic therapy. Anti-neoplastic agents are poisonous to the cells, affecting the synthesis of folic acid and damaging the DNA, RNA, and protein that damage the bone marrow. Destruction of bone marrow decreases absolute neutrophil count in the blood. To assess the baseline data and practice of oncology nurses, develop and implement the evidence-based standard nursing protocol, assess the satisfaction level of the patients for the utility of the standard nursing protocol, find out the correlation between knowledge and practice and to associate the knowledge and practice score with selected demographic variables. Material And Method In the study quasi-experimental design was utilized. The study was conducted at Siddharth Gupta Memorial Cancer Hospital, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha city, between June to Aug 2022 Result The result of the study shows the mean value per existing knowledge is 7.59 and practices is 37.95, post knowledge is 14.23, and post practices is 71.15. The standard deviation values of per exiting knowledge are 2.67 and, practice 3.09 and, post knowledge is 2.32, post practices are 1.32. The calculated t-value of knowledge is 46.57and the p-value is 0001. The calculated t-value of practice is 12.03, and the p-value is 0.0001. Conclusion The present research concluded that the knowledge and skills of oncology nurses are enhanced after implementing the standard nursing protocol.

Afebrile chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: an international survey spots oncologists' routine clinical practice versus the standard of care and the impact of COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Afebrile chemotherapy-induced neutropenia represents a frequent clinical situation where chemotherapy protocol, patient's comorbidities, and disease status determine the risk of infection hence the management plan. Internationally distributed, this questionnaire aims to evaluate the routine practice and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on afebrile chemotherapy-induced neutropenia management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Coordinators from Egypt, Morocco, Azerbaijan, and Russia developed a 12-item questionnaire using Google forms to explore how oncologists deal with afebrile chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. The link to the survey was available internationally through social media and to their local societies over the period from July to September 2021. RESULTS: We received 151 responses from 4 world regions: 58.9, 9.9, 11.3, and 15.2% from the Mena area, Russia, Europe, and Asia. The responses deviated from the guideline-driven practice as G-CSF was the most chosen option for intermediate risk that was statistically different based on the academic background of the treating physician. Half of the responders ignored patients and disease risk factors in the intermediate-risk cases that trend was statistically different based on the geographical distribution. The steroid was a valid option for intermediate and low-risk as per oncologists practicing in Russia. COVID-19 pandemic positively affected the rate of prescription of G-CSF as expected. CONCLUSION: The disparities in the routine practice of oncologists based on their geographical and academic backgrounds highlight the need to analyze the underlying obstacles that hinder guideline-based practice like workload or lack of the proper knowledge.

Colony stimulating factors for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in children.

INTRODUCTION: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is one of the complications of chemotherapy that can increase the risk of infection and mortality. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) are used in practice to prevent and treat episodes of neutropenia. The use of G-CSFs in children with cancer has not been studied much for primary prophylaxis of FN. AREAS COVERED: Current data suggest that G-CSFs have a similar pharmacokinetic profile in children and adults. Clinical trials published from 2002 to 2021 using G-CSFs in pediatric cancer patients were reviewed. All evaluated clinical trials used a dosage of 5 mcg/kg of filgrastim daily until neutrophil recovery or a single dose of 100 mcg/kg pegfilgrastim. Filgrastim demonstrated the benefit in decreasing the duration of fever, hospital stay, and antibiotic use in high-risk neuroblastoma patients. Pegfilgrastim showed similar efficacy in reducing the occurrence of FN and infections, with bone pain as an adverse effect. EXPERT OPINION: Filgrastim 5 mcg/kg/day or pegfilgrastim 100 mcg/kg single dose is appropriate when given at least 24 hours or after the chemotherapy in pediatric patients who weigh 45 kg or more. More prospective randomized trials are necessary to further investigate the efficacy and safety of G-CSFs in children with different types of cancer.

Effects of Prophylactic Administration of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor on Peripheral Leukocyte and Neutrophil Counts Levels After Chemotherapy in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Both chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and febrile neutropenia (FN) frequently occur and can lead to dose-limiting toxicity and even fatal chemotherapy side effects. The prophylactic use of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF), including pegylated rhG-CSF (PEG-rhG-CSF), significantly reduces the risks of CIN and FN during chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) patients. However, whether the prophylactic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), especially PEG-rhG-CSF, can influence white blood cell (WBC) counts and absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) after finishing the chemotherapy remains unknown. Therefore, exploring the development and recovery tendency of WBC counts and ANCs during and after chemotherapy is crucial. Objective: We aimed to investigate the variation tendency and recovery of WBC counts and ANCs during and after chemotherapy and evaluate the independent factors influencing leukopenia and neutropenia lasting longer after chemotherapy. We also aimed to provide individualized prophylactically leukocyte elevation therapy for breast cancer patients. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study evaluated 515 ESBC patients who received rhG-CSF or PEG-G-CSF for prophylaxis after adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Blood test reports were analyzed during chemotherapy, and on a 12-month follow-up period after finishing the chemotherapy. The WBC counts and ANCs were measured to assess their variation tendency characteristics and to identify independent factors that influenced the occurrence of leukopenia and neutropenia lasting longer than 12 months after chemotherapy. Results: Prophylaxis with rhG-CSF or PEG-rhG-CSF kept the mean values of WBC counts and ANCs within the normal range during chemotherapy, but a significant difference in WBC levels was detected before the end of the last chemotherapy compared to the prechemotherapy period (baseline) (p < 0.001). During the 12-month follow-up after the end of the last chemotherapy, WBC counts and ANCs gradually recovered, but the group that used only PEG-rhG-CSF (long-acting group, p WBC = 0.012) or rhG-CSF (short-acting group, p WBC = 0.0005) had better leukocyte elevation effects than the mixed treatment group (PEG-rhG-CSF mixed rhG-CSF). Besides, the short-acting group had a better neutrophil elevation effect than the longer-acting (p ANC = 0.019) and mixed (p ANC = 0.002) groups. Leukopenia was still present in 92 (17.9%) patients and neutropenia in 63 (12.2%) 12 months after the end of the last chemotherapy. The duration of leukopenia over 12 months was closely associated with the baseline WBC level (p < 0.001), G-CSF types (p = 0.027), and surgical method (p = 0.041). Moreover, the duration of neutropenia over 12 months was closely related to the baseline ANC (p < 0.001), G-CSF types (p = 0.043), and molecular typing (p = 0.025). Conclusion: The prophylactic application of G-CSF effectively stabilized the WBC counts and ANCs during chemotherapy in ESBC patients. Nevertheless, the recovery of WBC counts and ANCs after chemotherapy varied between different G-CSF treatment groups. The risk of leukopenia and neutropenia persisting for more than 12 months after chemotherapy was associated with G-CSF types, the baseline level of WBC count/ANCs, surgical method, and molecular typing.

Prophylaxis of Neutropenia with Lipegfilgrastim in Breast Cancer Patients with Dose-Dense Chemotherapy: Results of a Noninterventional Study on Therapeutic Routine in Germany (NADENS).

Introduction: Noninterventional study (NIS) on application and effectiveness of primary G-CSF prophylaxis with lipegfilgrastim in primary breast cancer patients undergoing dose-dense (dd) or intense-dose-dense (idd) chemotherapy (CTx) regimen in daily clinical practice. Methods: Prospective, multicenter, single-arm, NIS in 41 private practices and 27 hospitals in Germany. Results: Data analysis of 282 patients with a mean age of 49 years (93.6% of patients <65 years) was performed. Hormone receptor status was triple negative in 29.8% of patients, and 81.9% of patients were HER2 negative. A total of 73.8% of patients received "EC dd → taxane CTx." Patients received lipegfilgrastim prophylaxis in 97.5% of 1,121 documented dd/idd cycles. Overall, the study registered 275 events of SN (CTCAE grade 3 or 4) and 9 events of FN. During the first dd cycle, SN occurred in 33.3% and FN in 1.1% of patients. CTx delay or dose reduction due to neutropenia was required in 2.5% of patients during the 4 dd cycles with lipegfilgrastim support. Overall, 314 adverse events (AEs) were reported from 107 patients and 27 serious AEs from 21 patients. None of the SAEs was "fatal," and CTCAE grade was mostly (89.6%) assessed as "1" or "2." According to the treating physicians, 99.3% of all patients benefitted from lipegfilgrastim prophylaxis, and tolerability was mostly rated "very good" or "good." Conclusion: These results suggest that primary lipegfilgrastim prophylaxis is effective and safe in clinical routine and is beneficial in primary breast cancer patients undergoing dd/idd-ETC CTx.

A novel intervention: Implementation of a neutropenic infection-prevention bundle and audit tool in an oncology unit.

Infectious complications are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Specific infection control practices targeting this patient population are widely endorsed, but little guidance exists on how to implement and monitor compliance with these practices. At our institution, we increased compliance with infection control measures by using a bundled neutropenic precaution (NP) audit and feedback tool.