Associations between ultra-distal forearm bone mineral density and incident fracture in women.

Bone mineral density measured at the ultra-distal forearm site was associated with any fracture, as well as distal radius fracture in women from a longitudinal cohort study. PURPOSE: Femoral neck (BMDhip) and lumbar spine (BMDspine) bone mineral density (BMD) are routinely used to assess fracture risk. More data are needed to understand how ultra-distal forearm BMD (BMDUDforearm) may assist fracture prediction. METHODS: Using a Lunar DPX-L, Geelong Osteoporosis Study women (n = 1026), aged 40-90 years, had BMD measured. Incident low-trauma fractures were radiologically verified. Using Cox proportional hazard models, hazard ratios (HR) were calculated for BMDUDforearm as a continuous variable (expressed as a one-unit decrease in T-score) and a categorical variable (normal/osteopenia/osteoporosis). Areas under receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curves were calculated. Analyses were conducted for any fracture and distal radius fractures. RESULTS: During 14,270 person-years of follow-up, there were 318 fractures (85 distal radius). In adjusted models, continuous BMDUDforearm was associated with any (HR 1.26;95%CI 1.15-1.39) and distal radius fractures (HR 1.59;95%CI 1.38-1.83). AUROCs for continuous BMDUDforearm, 33% forearm(BMD33%forearm), BMDhip, BMDspine, and FRAX without BMD were similar for any fracture (p > 0.05). For distal radius fracture, the AUROC for BMDUDforearm was higher than other sites and FRAX (p < 0.05). In adjusted models, those with osteoporosis had a higher likelihood of any fracture (HR 2.12; 95%CI 1.50-2.98). For distal radius fractures, both osteopenia and osteoporosis had a higher risk (HR 4.31; 95%CI 2.59-7.15 and 4.81; 95%CI 2.70-8.58). AUROCs for any fracture were similar for categorical BMD at all sites but lower for FRAX (p < 0.05). For distal radius fractures, the AUROC for BMDUDforearm, was higher than other sites and FRAX (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Ultra-distal forearm BMD may aid risk assessments for any distal radius fractures.

Ultrasound Secondary Signs for the Diagnosis of Pediatric Distal Forearm Fractures: A Diagnostic Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound secondary signs of fractures in pediatric patients aged 5-15 y presenting to the emergency department with a clinically non-deformed distal forearm injury. METHODS: This diagnostic study was conducted in South East Queensland, Australia. Emergency clinicians performed point-of-care ultrasound on eligible patients and recorded secondary signs of fractures (pronator quadratus hematoma [PQH] sign, periosteal hematoma, visible angulation) or physeal fractures (fracture-to-physis distance [FPD], physis alteration). The reference standard was the final fracture diagnosis determined by expert panel. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of secondary signs for cortical breach and physeal fractures. Diagnostic statistics were reported for each relevant secondary sign. RESULTS: A total of 135 participants were enrolled. The expert panel diagnosed 48 "no" fracture, 52 "buckle" fracture and 35 "other" fracture. All "other" fractures were cortical breach fractures and included 15 Salter-Harris II fractures. The PQH sign demonstrated high sensitivity and moderate specificity to diagnose cortical breach fractures (91%, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 78%-97% and 82%, 73%-88%). Poor sensitivity but high specificity was observed for the visible angulation and periosteal hematoma secondary signs. FPD <1cm showed perfect sensitivity and moderate specificity (100%, 80%-100% and 85%, 78%-90%) for diagnosis of Salter-Harris II fracture. Conversely, physis alteration showed poor sensitivity but excellent specificity (40%, 20%-64% and 99%, 95%-100%) for the diagnosis of Salter-Harris II fractures. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound secondary signs showed good diagnostic accuracy for both cortical breach fractures and Salter-Harris II fractures. Future research should consider optimal use of secondary signs to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Multi-Class Deep Learning Model for Detecting Pediatric Distal Forearm Fractures Based on the AO/OTA Classification.

Common pediatric distal forearm fractures necessitate precise detection. To support prompt treatment planning by clinicians, our study aimed to create a multi-class convolutional neural network (CNN) model for pediatric distal forearm fractures, guided by the AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/ATO) classification system for pediatric fractures. The GRAZPEDWRI-DX dataset (2008-2018) of wrist X-ray images was used. We labeled images into four fracture classes (FRM, FUM, FRE, and FUE with F, fracture; R, radius; U, ulna; M, metaphysis; and E, epiphysis) based on the pediatric AO/ATO classification. We performed multi-class classification by training a YOLOv4-based CNN object detection model with 7006 images from 1809 patients (80% for training and 20% for validation). An 88-image test set from 34 patients was used to evaluate the model performance, which was then compared to the diagnosis performances of two readers-an orthopedist and a radiologist. The overall mean average precision levels on the validation set in four classes of the model were 0.97, 0.92, 0.95, and 0.94, respectively. On the test set, the model's performance included sensitivities of 0.86, 0.71, 0.88, and 0.89; specificities of 0.88, 0.94, 0.97, and 0.98; and area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.87, 0.83, 0.93, and 0.94, respectively. The best performance among the three readers belonged to the radiologist, with a mean AUC of 0.922, followed by our model (0.892) and the orthopedist (0.830). Therefore, using the AO/OTA concept, our multi-class fracture detection model excelled in identifying pediatric distal forearm fractures.

Distal forearm squeeze test for the diagnosis of digital flexor tendon injuries.

BACKGROUND: The forearm/wrist squeeze/compression test has been used to examine digital flexor tendon injuries with varied names. Furthermore, the test has not been minutely described and its mechanism remains unclear. We renamed the test the "distal forearm squeeze test". The purpose of this study was to elaborate on the test and elucidate the mechanism. METHODS: Two patients with digital flexor tendons ruptured in zone 3 and zone 1 respectively and 50 outpatients with intact digital tendons underwent the test. Then the test was performed on 3 chickens under 4 conditions. First, when the digital flexor and extensor tendons were all intact. Second, after the flexor tendons of the third toe were transected. Third, after the flexor tendons of all toes of the foot were transected. Finally, after the flexor and extensor tendons of all toes of the foot were transected. RESULTS: In the patient with digital flexor tendons ruptured in zone 3, the test showed that the injured digit was flexed slightly while the uninjured digits were flexed obviously. In the patient with digital flexor tendon ruptured in zone 1, after separate stabilization of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of the injured and uninjured fingers in extension, the test showed that the distal interphalangeal joint of the patient's injured finger had no response, while those of the uninjured fingers were flexed. All 50 subjects showed clenched or half-clenched hands in response to the test. The test showed that all toes were flexed when the digital tendons of the chicken were intact. All toes were flexed except the third toe after the flexor tendons of the third toe were transected. All toes were extended after all the digital flexor tendons were transected. All toes had no response after all the digital flexor and extensor tendons were transected. CONCLUSIONS: The distal forearm squeeze test is valuable in examining digital flexor tendon injuries. If only the flexor digitorum profundus tendon is examined, the PIP joint of the finger should be stabilized in extension during the test.

A Giant Lipoma in the Distal Forearm of a Cadaver.

OBJECTIVE: Lipomas are very common tumors which usually prefer the upper limbs and, depending on their size, may cause nerve compression, or may be asymptomatic. The current cadaveric report describes a giant lipoma in the distal forearm area. CASE REPORT: A large mass (5.1 × 3.2 × 1.6 cm) was identified on the palmar surface of the distal forearm, during dissection of a 63-year-old male cadaver. The mass caused anteromedial displacement and flattening of the median nerve (MN). Despite the lack of information about the subject's medical history, MN compression was assumed on the basis of the lipoma's size, its vicinity to neural structures, and the MN displacement and flattening. CONCLUSION: The enlarged distal forearm lipoma, located adjacent to the carpal tunnel, displaced and flattened the MN. The cadaveric finding described is clinically relevant for both differential diagnosis and surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Pronation-Type Galeazzi-Equivalent Fracture: A Case Report.

Fractures of the forearm are common among children and adolescents. Radial shaft fracture with dislocation of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ), called Galeazzi fracture, is unusual in pediatrics. The Galeazzi-equivalent fracture is a variant of the classic Galeazzi fracture that occurs in children and adolescents. It is a radius fracture associated with a distal ulnar displaced physeal injury without dislocation of the DRUJ. Our patient was a male, aged 15 years, who visited our emergency department after falling off a scooter onto his left hand. Left wrist X-rays showed a displaced Galeazzi-equivalent fracture. After a trial of close reduction, an X-ray showed a displaced and unstable fracture pattern. The patient was subsequently hospitalized for surgical intervention. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with a plate and screw were used for the radius fracture. The ulna fracture was irreducible; therefore, ORIF with two crossed smooth Kirschner wires (K-wires) was performed. Complete bone union was achieved, and he had a normal range of motion six months postoperatively. The patient is now able to perform daily and sports activities. At two-year follow-up, complications such as DRUJ instability or joint deformity did not occur. In conclusion, open reduction is desired for patients with malalignment or older patients who have a lower potential for sufficient bone remodeling. Regular serial follow-up sessions are required to assess growth arrest and the occurrence of other complications.

Intramedullary Kirschner wire fixation of displaced distal forearm fractures in children.

AIM OF THE WORK: This study was designed to highlight internal fixation by intramedullary K-wires for displaced distal forearm fractures among children and analyze the results of this technique. We hypothesize that physis-sparing intramedullary fixation prevents displacement with a lower complication rate. METHODS: This prospective case series involving 47 patients was conducted between February 2018 and December 2019. All patients with open physis presented with recent displaced distal forearm fractures were included, and all of them were treated with an intramedullary k-wire fixation for both bones with the assessment of the union rate, union time, suspected complication, radiographic evaluation, and functional outcome. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 31 boys (66%) and 16 girls (34%). The mean age of the patients was 10.68 ± 2.728 years (range, 7-15 years). All fractures were united in a median of 6 weeks (range, 4-8 weeks), The functional outcome after 12 months was normal in 42 patients (89.4%), whereas, in five patients (10.6%), the functional parameters were minimally reduced. The median preoperative angulation improved from 36° (range, 24°-52°) preoperatively to 4° (range, 0°-10°) on immediate postoperative radiographs. After 12 months, the median angulation was 2° (range, 0°-7°) (p < 0.001). The angulation of the distal radius immediately after surgery and at the final follow-up was statistically correlated with the functional outcome (p < 0.001 and 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSION: This technique provides a good result with less susceptibility to re-displacement and low complication rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Subcutaneous Dorsomedial Triangle of Forearm: Surgical Anatomy and Clinical Implication.

Background The purpose of the study was to provide a practical landmark for localizing the dorsal branch of the ulnar artery and nerve, to approach for microsurgical flaps, for harvesting nerve grafts and also to avoid these nerves during insertion of wrist arthroscopy portals. Material and methods Forty adult cadaveric upper limbs (20 right and 20 left) were dissected for localizing the dorsal branches of the ulnar artery and nerve. The ramification patterns of the nerve were mapped. The wrist arthroscopy portals are located radial and ulnar to the tendon of extensor carpi ulnaris at the level of the wrist joint, and their designated names are '6R & 6U', respectively. The distance of branches of the nerve from the 6U and 6R portals for wrist arthroscopy was recorded. Results The present study has delineated a subcutaneous dorsomedial triangular area in the distal forearm. The construction of this triangle uses palpable landmarks, i.e. pisiform bone, styloid process and subcutaneous border of the ulna. The measure of the sides of the triangle uses proportion rather than absolute measurements and hence is person specific. The dorsal branches of the ulnar nerve and artery are consistently given off in the triangle's upper third and middle third, respectively. Four branching patterns have been mapped, with one dominant pattern in 67.5% of limbs. In three-fourths of cases, one branch of the dorsal branch of the ulnar nerve consistently overlies the 6U portal and hence runs a higher risk of injury. Conclusion The study suggests more practical, accurate, reliable and consistent surface landmarks for the localization of the dorsal branch of the ulnar artery and nerve for reconstructive microsurgery for distal hand defects.

Below- versus above-elbow cast treatment of displaced distal forearm fractures in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Objectives: Distal forearm fractures are the most common pediatric fractures. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of below-elbow cast treatment for displaced distal forearm fractures in children compared to above-elbow cast through meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Methods: Several databases from January 1, 2000 until October 1, 2021 were searched for randomized controlled trials that assessed below versus above-elbow cast treatment of displaced distal forearm fractures in pediatric patients. The main meta-analysis comparison was based on the relative risk of loss of fracture reduction between children undergoing below versus above-elbow cast treatment. Other outcome measures including re-manipulation and cast-related complications were also investigated. Results: Nine studies were eligible of the 156 articles identified, with a total of 1049 children. Analysis was undertaken for all included studies with a sensitivity analysis conducted for studies with high quality. In the sensitivity analysis, the relative risks of loss of fracture reduction (relative risk = 0.6, 95% confidence interval = 0.38, 0.96) and re-manipulation (relative risk = 0.3, 95% confidence interval = 0.19, 0.48) between the below and above-elbow cast groups were in favor of below-elbow cast and statistically significant. Cast-related complications were in favor of below-elbow cast but did not attain statistical significance (relative risk = 0.45, 95% confidence interval = 0.05, 3.99). Loss of fracture reduction was noted in 28.9% of patients treated with above-elbow cast and 21.5% in below-elbow cast. Re-manipulation was attempted in 48.1% versus 53.8% of children who lost fracture reduction in the below-elbow cast and above-elbow cast groups, respectively. Conclusion: Below-elbow cast treatment was favored, with statistical significance, in terms of loss of fracture reduction and re-manipulation, and was not associated with a higher risk of cast-related complications. The accumulative evidence currently does not support above-elbow cast treatment and below-elbow cast treatment should be the mainstay for displaced distal forearm fractures in children. Level of evidence: Level I, meta-analysis of therapeutic level I studies.

Closed reduction and cast immobilization of overriding distal forearm fractures under nitrous oxide as conscious sedation without the use of imaging control.

PURPOSE: The management of overriding distal forearm fractures is still controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of immediate closed reduction and cast immobilization (CRCI) at the emergency department (ED) using equimolar nitrous oxide (eN2O2) as conscious sedation, and without the use fluoroscopic assistance. METHODS: Sixty patients with overriding distal forearm fracture were included in the study. All procedures were performed in the ED without fluoroscopic assistance. Antero-posterior and lateral wrist radiographs were taken after CRCI. Follow-up radiographs were taken 7 and 15 days post-reduction, and at cast removal to evaluate callus formation. Depending on the radiological outcome, two groups of patients could be identified: Group 1 (satisfactory reduction and maintenance of alignment) and Group 2 (poor reduction or secondary displacement requiring further manipulation and surgical fixation). Group 2 was additionally divided into Group 2A (poor reduction) and Group 2B (secondary displacement). Pain was assessed using Numeric Pain Intensity (NPI) score, while functional outcome was measured according to Quick DASH questionnaire. RESULTS: Mean age at the time of injury was 9.2 ± 2.4 years (range, 5-14). Twenty-three (38%) patients were aged between 4 and 9 years old, 20 (33%) patients between 9 and 11, 11 (18%) patients between 11 and 13, and 6 (10%) patients between 13 and 14. The mean follow-up time was 45.6 ± 12 months (range, 24-63). Satisfactory reduction with maintenance of alignment was achieved in 30 (50%) patients (Group 1). Re-reduction was performed in the remaining 30 (50%) patients (Group 2) due to poor reduction (Group 2A) or secondary displacement (Group 2B). No complications related to the administration of eN2O were recorded. No statistically significant difference could be identified between the three groups for any clinical variable (Quick DASH and NPI). CONCLUSION: Overriding distal forearm fractures may be safely treated with CRCI at ED using eN2O2 as conscious sedation. However, fluoroscopic assistance during CRCI might significantly improve the quality of reduction thus avoiding further treatment as the lack of relaxed muscle can restrain reduction.

Clinical Follow-Up without Radiographs Is Sufficient after Most Nonoperatively Treated Distal Radius Fractures in Children.

Distal forearm fractures are common in children and are usually treated nonoperatively. No consensus has been reached on how to perform clinical and radiographic follow-up of these fractures. Our aim was to study whether radiographic and clinical follow-up is justified. We included 100 consecutive patients with non-operatively treated distal forearm fractures who were treated at Oulu University Hospital in 2010-2011. The natural history of the fractures during the nonoperative treatment was analyzed by measuring the potential worsening of the alignment during the follow-up period. The limits of acceptable fracture position were set according to the current literature using "strict" or "wide" criteria for alignment. We determined the rate of worsening fracture position (i.e., patients who reached the threshold of unacceptable alignment). In relation to splinting, we evaluated how many patients benefited from clinical follow-up. Most of the fractures (98%) preserved acceptable alignment during the entire follow-up period when wide criteria were used. The application of stricter criteria for alignment in radiographs showed loss of reduction in 19% of the fractures. Worsening of the alignment was recognized at a mean of 13 days (range 5-29) after the injury. One in three (32%) patients needed some intervention due to splint loosening or failure. Radiographic follow-up of nonoperatively treated distal forearm fractures remains questionable. Instead, clinical follow-up is important, as 32% of patients needed their splints fixed.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound Fracture-Physis Distance Association with Salter-Harris II Fractures of the Distal Radius in Children: The "POCUS 1-cm Rule".

Salter-Harris II fractures of the distal radius can result in serious complications. The aim of this study was to measure the fracture-physis distance using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to determine whether a certain distance is associated with Salter-Harris II fractures, compared with other fracture types, in a cohort of children with X-ray-identified distal radius fractures. Participants were from a parent diagnostic study conducted in an Australian tertiary pediatric emergency department, which prospectively evaluated the diagnosis of pediatric distal forearm fractures using POCUS compared against X-ray. Nurse practitioners, who underwent 2 h of training, administered a six-view POCUS protocol in clinically non-angulated pediatric forearm injuries prior to X-ray. This was a secondary analysis of data from the parent study. The 122 participants with X-ray-identified distal radius fractures from the parent study had their POCUS images interpreted by two emergency physician sonologists, who measured the fracture-physis distance. The median and maximum fracture-physis distances for Salter-Harris II fractures (n = 19) were 8.00 and 9.85 mm, whereas minimum and median distances for incomplete fractures (n = 22) were 10.20 and 15.98 mm, and those for complete fractures (n = 9) were 10.85 and 12.85 mm. Buckle fracture (n = 72) distances ranged from 4.35 to 26.55 mm, with a median of 13.65 mm. In children diagnosed with a distal radius fracture on X-ray, a fracture-physis distance cutoff of 1 cm differentiated Salter-Harris II fractures from other cortical breach fracture types, but not buckle fractures. Although this exploratory study suggests the "POCUS 1-cm rule" could be used as a secondary sign to augment the diagnosis of Salter-Harris II distal radius fractures using POCUS, further research is required to validate this measurement prospectively.

Clinical Audit of Manipulation of Paediatric Forearm Fractures in the Emergency Department at a District General Hospital: A Quality Improvement Project.

Background Early reduction of paediatric forearm fractures under procedural analgesia has the benefit of avoiding admission and general anaesthesia. In addition to lowering the risks of treatment and reducing the number of treatment episodes, this approach also reduces the psychological stresses on the child and the parents. British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) and Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) guidelines recommend that all units managing paediatric fractures should have protocols to facilitate procedural analgesia for manipulation of forearm fractures. A recent standard operating procedure has been created for this purpose and has outlined local standards to adhere to. Regular audits of paediatric manipulations in the emergency department must be undertaken in line with GIRFT recommendations. The aim is to identify potential barriers to implementation, which can be improved, and to ensure that a high standard of care is delivered.  Aim The aim of this study was to assess the effects of the introduction of local guidelines on the manipulation of paediatric fractures in the emergency department, to assess the adherence of the emergency/orthopaedic departments with these guidelines, and to assess the outcome of all childhood forearm manipulations at University Hospitals Dorset (UHD), to help guide further practice. Material and methods This was a retrospective and prospective study in which the patients admitted to Poole Hospital, Poole, United Kingdom were identified according to the criteria and were analyzed in three separate groups in terms of pre-implementation and post-implementation. Patients were gathered from the orthopaedic on-call trauma lists. All paediatric patients who had a forearm fracture were included (including those who were not manipulated). The first group was the surveillance group in which a clinical audit was completed to review if any of the paediatric patients with forearm fractures were being manipulated in accident and emergency (A&E). The second group included the patients for whom the first standard operating procedure documentation was initiated with the intention of improving the service provided and reduce the number of paediatric forearm fractures going to theatre for simple manipulation and prevent a general anaesthetic. The third group was to review the established pathway and to see which areas of the pathway needed focus to make it better and more in line with the flow of patients through the emergency department. These plan, do, study, act (PDSA) cycles took place from March 2022 to March 2023. Paediatric patients with open or neurovascular damage were excluded from the cohort. The findings and the data were analysed in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, United States) and presented through regional meetings to discuss the progress and potential changes in making the pathway by involving all the stakeholders, i.e., the emergency department, orthopaedic department, and theatre managers. Results  An overall reduction was seen in paediatric forearm fractures going to theatre. Almost 30% of the forearm fractures were attended to in the emergency department, identification of factors that affect the numbers was quantified, and improvement in documentation throughout the PDSA cycles was observed.

Epidemiology of distal radius fractures: a detailed survey on a large sample of patients in a suburban area.

BACKGROUND: Literature lacks data on correlations between epidemiology and clinical data of patients with distal radius fractures (DRFs). AIM: The aim of this study was to present a detailed epidemiologic survey of a large consecutive series of patient with DRFs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 827 consecutive patients (579 females, 248 men) who sustained a DRFs in the last 5 years. All fractures were radiographically evaluated. DRFs were classified according to Association of Osteosynthesis classification. Data on age, gender, side, period in which fracture occurred, and fracture mechanism were collected. Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 60.23 [standard deviation (SD) 16.65] years, with the left side being most frequently involved (56.1%). The mean age of females at the time of fracture was significantly higher than that of males. The most frequent pattern of fracture was the complete articular fracture (64.3%), while the most represented fracture type was 2R3A2.2 (21.5%). Regarding the period in which the fracture occurred, 305 DRFs (37.5%) were observed in the warmer months and 272 (33.4%) in the colder months. Low-energy trauma occurring outside home was found to be the major cause of DRF throughout the year. In both genders, trauma mechanism 2 was more frequent (59.4% F; 31.9% M; p < 0.01). A bimodal distribution of fracture mechanisms was found in males when considering the patient's age with a high-energy mechanism of fracture (3 and 4), identified in 21% (n = 52) of males aged 18-45 years, and a low-energy mechanism (1 and 2) was observed in 39.9% (n = 99) of males aged > 45 years. A significant correlation between all trauma mechanisms (from 1 to 6) and different fracture patterns (complete, partial, and extraarticular) was found (p value < 0.001). The mean age of patients with extraarticular fractures (mean age 61.75 years; SD 18.18 years) was higher than that of those with complete (mean age 59.84 years; SD 15.67 years) and partial fractures (mean age 55.26 years; SD 18.31 years). Furthermore, considering different fracture patterns and patient age groups, a statistically significant difference was found (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DRFs have a higher prevalence in females, an increase in incidence with older age, and no seasonal predisposition. Low-energy trauma occurring at home is the main cause of fracture among younger males sustaining fractures after sports trauma; Complete articular is the most frequent fracture pattern, while 2R3A2.2 is most frequent fracture type. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV; case series; descriptive epidemiology study.

Epidemiology of Distal Forearm Fracture: A Population-Based Study of 5426 Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Despite intensive research into the epidemiology of adult distal forearm fractures, the literature is limited. This study aimed to provide a full overview of adult distal forearm fracture epidemiology, including incidence, fracture classification, mode of injury, and trauma mechanism in patients sustaining a distal forearm fracture, based on an accurate at-risk population with manually validated data leading to a high quality in data. METHODS: This was a population-based cohort study with a manual review of X-rays and charts. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of adult distal forearm fractures. The study was based on an average at-risk population of 522 607 citizens. A total of 5426 adult distal forearm fractures were included during the study period. Females accounted for 4199 (77%) and males accounted for 1227 (23%) of fractures. RESULTS: The overall incidence of adult distal forearm fractures was 207.7/100 000/year. Female incidence was 323.4/100 000/year, and male incidence was 93.3/100 000/year. A marked increase in incidence with increasing age was observed for females after 50 years of age. The incidence of distal radius fractures was 203.0/100 000/year, and the incidence of isolated ulna fractures was 3.8/100 000/year. The most common fracture type was an extra-articular AO type 2R3A (69%), and the most common mode of injury was a fall from own height (76%). A small non-trending year-to-year variation was observed during the 5-year study period. CONCLUSION: Results show that adult distal forearm fractures are very common in women after the postmenopausal period. The overall incidence of adult distal forearm fractures was 207.8/100 000/year. Female incidence was 323.4/100 000/year.

Children's distal forearm fractures: a population-based epidemiology study of 4,316 fractures.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to report a complete overview of both incidence, fracture distribution, mode of injury, and patient baseline demographics of paediatric distal forearm fractures to identify age of risk and types of activities leading to injury. METHODS: Population-based cohort study with manual review of radiographs and charts. The primary outcome measure was incidence of paediatric distal forearm fractures. The study was based on an average at-risk population of 116,950. A total number of 4,316 patients sustained a distal forearm fracture in the study period. Females accounted for 1,910 of the fractures (44%) and males accounted for 2,406 (56%). RESULTS: The overall incidence of paediatric distal forearm fractures was 738.1/100,000 persons/year (95% confidence interval (CI) 706/100,000 to 770/100,000). Female incidences peaked with an incidence of 1,578.3/100,000 persons/year at age ten years. Male incidence peaked at age 13 years, with an incidence of 1,704.3/100,000 persons/year. The most common fracture type was a greenstick fracture to the radius (48%), and the most common modes of injury were sports and falls from ≤ 1 m. A small year-to-year variation was reported during the five-year study period, but without any trends. CONCLUSION: Results show that paediatric distal forearm fractures are very common throughout childhood in both sexes, with almost 2% of males aged 13 years sustaining a forearm fracture each year. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(6):448-454.

Describing the learning curve of novices for the diagnosis of paediatric distal forearm fractures using point-of-care ultrasound.

Purpose: The learning curve of nurse practitioners (NPs) to accurately diagnose paediatric distal forearm fractures using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) was investigated. Methods: Each NP's learning curve was calculated as cumulative diagnostic accuracy against a number of scans performed. The curve's plateau represented the attainment of competency. Secondary outcomes were the comparisons before and after this cut-off of diagnostic accuracy, classification of diagnostic errors, pain scores, duration and preference. Results: Five NPs performed 201 POCUS studies with diagnostic accuracy plateauing at 90%, providing a 'cut-off' point at scan 15. Accuracy of POCUS scanning before and after the fifteenth scan was 81% (95% CI 70%-89%) and 90% (95% CI 84%-94%), respectively, demonstrating 9% improvement (P = 0.07). There was a 10% reduction in image interpretation errors. After fifteen scans, POCUS became faster (mean difference (MD) 2.6 min [95% CI 2.0-3.3], P < 0.001), less painful (MD 0.61 points FPSR scale [95% CI 0.04-1.18], P = 0.04) and more preferred by NPs (63% vs 77%, P = 0.03). Discussion: The learning curve of POCUS-novice NPs independently scanning paediatric distal forearm injuries plateaued with mean diagnostic accuracy of 90% after 15 scans, suggesting competency was attained at this cut-off, supported by higher accuracy, being faster, less painful and more preferred by NPs. Future training packages in forearm POCUS should further address image interpretation and provide ongoing expert feedback. Conclusions: The findings from this study suggest that competency in paediatric distal forearm POCUS can be attained by novices after a short training course and approximately 15 scans.

Epidemiology and Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Finland-A Nationwide Register Study.

A distal radius fracture (DRF) is one of the most common fractures in emergency units, the treatment of which requires considerable health care resources. We analyzed the incidence rate for DRFs and the incidence rate of operative treatment over a five-year period, 2015-2019, for the entire population of Finland and all ages. Data was obtained from the Finnish National Care Register for Health Care. The results were counted as cases per 100,000 person/years and standardized with the European Standard Population 2013. The mean annual incidence rate of DRF was 204.90 (203.21-206.59) in specialist care and 69.53 (68.55-70.52) in primary care. It peaked among the pediatric population and among elderly women, in whom it was more than four times as common compared to men of the same age. No increase in the incidence rate of DRFs was found. The mean incidence rate of operative treatment was 45.66 (45.66-45.66)/100,000 person/years, 2015-2019; women were more likely to undergo operative treatment. Altogether, 15-18% of DRFs were operated on over the study period. The annual incidence rate of operations seemed to plateau compared to earlier studies in Finland.

Development of a Novel X-ray Compatible 3D-Printed Bone Model to Characterize Different K-Wire Fixation Methods in Support of the Treatment of Pediatric Radius Fractures.

Additive manufacturing technologies are essential in biomedical modeling and prototyping. Polymer-based bone models are widely used in simulating surgical interventions and procedures. Distal forearm fractures are the most common pediatric fractures, in which the Kirschner wire fixation is the most widely used operative method. However, there is still lingering controversy throughout the published literature regarding the number of wires and sites of insertion. This study aims to critically compare the biomechanical stability of different K-wire fixation techniques. Different osteosyntheses were reconstructed on 189 novel standardized bone models, which were created using 3D printing and molding techniques, using PLA and polyurethane materials, and it has been characterized in terms of mechanical behavior and structure. X-ray imaging has also been performed. The validation of the model was successful: the relative standard deviations (RSD = 100 × SD × mean-1, where RSD is relative standard deviation, SD is the standard deviation) of the mechanical parameters varied between 1.1% (10° torsion; 6.52 Nm ± 0.07 Nm) and 5.3% (5° torsion; 4.33 Nm ± 0.23 Nm). The simulated fractures were fixed using two K-wires inserted from radial and dorsal directions (crossed wire fixation) or both from the radial direction, in parallel (parallel wire fixation). Single-wire fixations with shifted exit points were also included. Additionally, three-point bending tests with dorsal and radial load and torsion tests were performed. We measured the maximum force required for a 5 mm displacement of the probe under dorsal and radial loads (means for crossed wire fixation: 249.5 N and 355.9 N; parallel wire fixation: 246.4 N and 308.3 N; single wire fixation: 115.9 N and 166.5 N). We also measured the torque required for 5° and 10° torsion (which varied between 0.15 Nm for 5° and 0.36 Nm for 10° torsion). The crossed wire fixation provided the most stability during the three-point bending tests. Against torsion, both the crossed and parallel wire fixation were superior to the single-wire fixations. The 3D printed model is found to be a reliable, cost-effective tool that can be used to characterize the different fixation methods, and it can be used in further pre-clinical investigations.