Health optimisation for patients with obesity before elective orthopaedic surgery: a qualitative study of professionals' views on restrictive approaches and future practice.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative health optimisation for elective surgery entails supporting patients to improve their health in preparation for their treatment and recovery. While there is consensus that this process should address obesity, approaches vary across England. Despite guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence to the contrary, restrictive approaches with body mass index thresholds for referral to arthroplasty are in use. This qualitative study aimed to investigate the views of professionals on the current use and future implications of these policies. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 professionals including clinicians, commissioners, policymakers, and health service managers, with experience of developing and/or implementing health optimisation policies for elective arthroplasty. Participants were sampled from areas in England with and without restrictive policies. We undertook thematic analysis of the interview data. RESULTS: Participants described pre-surgical health optimisation as an important trigger for health improvement but identified current resourcing and inadequacies in provision of weight management support as significant barriers to success. Participants expressed concerns about the appropriateness and fairness of including obesity as a determinant to restrict access to surgery. They described short-term financial pressures underlying the use of restrictive body mass index thresholds and a lack of an evidence base, such that policies amounted to rationing and risked exacerbations of health inequalities. The study identified four priorities for improvements to future health optimisation practices: developing and implementing national guidance with flexibility for local variation, initiating patient engagement in primary care with onward integration across all services, improving resourcing to support effective equitable impact, and addressing wider determinants of obesity through societal change. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, participants had limited expectations of the impact of health optimisation policies on obesity without additional support, investment, and national guideline implementation. They raised strong concerns over current restrictive approaches. We conclude that addressing concerns around weight management support service availability and impacts on health inequalities is essential for shaping effective health optimisation policies. Future policy direction should support health optimisation to be offered early (ideally in primary care). Health optimisation interventions should be non-restrictive, inclusive, and well-monitored, particularly around equality impact.

Cognitive prehabilitation for older adults undergoing elective surgery: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Background: Perioperative cognitive maintenance and protection in older adults is an important patient safety imperative. In addition to foundational care, one area of growing interest is integrating cognitive prehabilitation into the surgical trajectory. This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of cognitive prehabilitation on cognitive functional capacity and postoperative cognitive outcomes among older adults undergoing elective surgery. Methods: The MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PEDro, CBM, CNKI, WANFANG, and VIP databases were systematically searched up to September 5, 2024, to identify randomized controlled trials published for English or Chinese. Two authors independently completed the study selection process, data extraction process and methodological quality assessment. The Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Study design framework was used to construct the search strategy. The predefined primary outcomes of interest included the incidence of postoperative delirium (POD) and the incidence of delayed neurocognitive recovery (dNCR). The quality of the studies was evaluated by the PEDro scale. Owing to the small number of trials and clinical and methodological diversity, a narrative synthesis was undertaken in accordance with the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis guidelines. This study was conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Results: Six studies were analysed. These trials involved 645 total participants, with 316 in the intervention group (mean age, 66.0-73.8 years; 38.4-77.8% male) and 329 in the comparator group (mean age, 67.5-72.6 years; 31.8-88.9% male). The effects of preoperative cognitive training on reducing the incidence of dNCR, the incidence of POD, the length of hospital stay and the incidence of postsurgical complications as well as improving postoperative global cognitive function and activities of daily living are quite uncertain. The results of this study should be interpreted with caution owing to the limited number of trials and low to very low certainty of evidence. Conclusion: Current evidence on the effectiveness and safety of cognitive prehabilitation on cognitive and noncognitive outcomes in older patients undergoing elective surgery is limited and unclear. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=277191, Identifier CRD42021277191.

An interrater reliability analysis of preoperative mortality risk calculators used for elective high-risk noncardiac surgical patients shows poor to moderate reliability.

BACKGROUND: Multiple preoperative calculators are available online to predict preoperative mortality risk for noncardiac surgical patients. However, it is currently unknown how these risk calculators perform across different raters. The current study investigated the interrater reliability of three preoperative mortality risk calculators in an elective high-risk noncardiac surgical patient population to evaluate if these calculators can be safely used for identification of high-risk noncardiac surgical patients for a preoperative multidisciplinary team discussion. METHODS: Five anesthesiologists assessed the preoperative mortality risk of 34 high-risk patients using the preoperative score to calculate postoperative mortality risks (POSPOM), the American College of Surgeons surgical risk calculator (SRC), and the surgical outcome risk tool (SORT). In total, 170 calculations per calculator were gathered. RESULTS: Interrater reliability was poor for SORT (ICC (C.I. 95%) = 0.46 (0.30-0.63)) and moderate for SRC (ICC = 0.65 (0.51-0.78)) and POSPOM (ICC = 0.63 (0.49-0.77). The absolute range of calculated mortality risk was 0.2-72% for POSPOM, 0-36% for SRC, and 0.4-17% for SORT. The coefficient of variation increased in higher risk classes for POSPOM and SORT. The extended Bland-Altman limits of agreement suggested that all raters contributed to the variation in calculated risks. CONCLUSION: The current results indicate that the preoperative risk calculators POSPOM, SRC, and SORT exhibit poor to moderate interrater reliability. These calculators are not sufficiently accurate for clinical identification and preoperative counseling of high-risk surgical patients. Clinicians should be trained in using mortality risk calculators. Also, clinicians should be cautious when using predicted mortality estimates from these calculators to identify high-risk noncardiac surgical patients for elective surgery.

Optimizing Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury Monitoring Using a Urine Biochemical Approach-Time to Bring More Dynamism to Serum Creatinine Evaluation!

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) impairment is common both intraoperatively and in the early postoperative period of major surgeries, even elective ones. In some patients, such impairment is subtle and short-lasting, not even detected by increases in serum creatinine (sCr) and, consequently, not of sufficient magnitude to fulfill acute kidney injury (AKI) sCr-based criteria. In patients with a GFR decrease of greater magnitude, significant increases in sCr will occur but, unfortunately, usually at a late time in its progression. Both urinary and serum biomarkers have been proposed to be capable of anticipating AKI development but they are not widely available nor cost-effective in most centers. In this context, a urine biochemical approach using urinary sodium concentration (NaU) and the fractional excretion of potassium (FeK) has been proposed, anticipating the level of renal microcirculatory stress and decreases in GFR. An educational postoperative case example is presented highlighting the relevance that this approach can have in the correct interpretation of sCr values, bringing more dynamism to renal function monitoring. How to cite this article: Maciel AT. Optimizing Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury Monitoring Using a Urine Biochemical Approach-Time to Bring More Dynamism to Serum Creatinine Evaluation! Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(8):729-733.

Equal waiting times for all? Empirical evidence for elective surgeries in the Austrian public healthcare system.

OBJECTIVES: This study analyses waiting times for elective surgeries and potential determinants, including supplementary private health insurance, visits in the operating physician's private practice and informal payments for faster treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective patient questionnaire survey. METHODS: The survey was conducted in eleven Austrian rehabilitation centres in 2019. Data was analysed based on bivariate tests (n = 400) and a multivariate negative-binomial regression model (n = 310) with institution- and patient-related characteristics as independent variables. RESULTS: Median waiting times were 8.9 weeks (IQR: 4.5-18.0) for hip replacement and 8.4 weeks (IQR: 5.0-20.0) for knee replacement surgery. 10.9% of the patients reported having received an offer to shorten their waiting time through a visit in the operating physician's private practice before the surgery or through an informal payment directly to the operating physician. Surgery in private for-profit hospitals, supplementary private health insurance and severe pain were associated with shorter waiting times. CONCLUSIONS: While waiting times for elective surgeries in Austria are below international levels, shorter waits for patients with private health insurance and offers to reduce waiting times through informal payments point to equitable access concerns in a public healthcare system.

Evaluation of the i-gel® Plus supraglottic airway device in elective surgery: a prospective international multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: The i-gel® Plus is a modified version of the i-gel® supraglottic airway device. It contains a wider drainage port; a longer tip; ramps inside the breathing channel; and an additional port for oxygen delivery. There has been no prospective evaluation of this device in clinical practice. METHODS: This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the performance of the i-gel Plus in adult patients undergoing elective procedures under general anaesthesia. The primary outcome was overall insertion success rate, defined as the ability to provide effective airway management through the device from insertion until the end of the surgical procedure. Secondary outcomes included device performance and incidence of postoperative adverse events. Data from the first 1000 patients are reported. RESULTS: In total, 1012 patients were enrolled; 12 forms were excluded from the final analysis due to incomplete data leaving 1000 included patients (545 female). Overall insertion success rate was 98.6%, with a first-attempt success rate of insertion of 88.2%. A significant difference between females and males was seen for the overall success rate (97.4% vs. 99.6% respectively) but not for first-attempt successful insertion. Mean (SD) oropharyngeal seal pressure was 32 (7) cmH2O. The only independent factor that increased the risk of first-attempt failure was low operator experience. Complications included desaturation < 85% in 0.6%; traces of blood on the device in 7.4%; laryngospasm in 0.5%; and gastric contents inside the bowl in 0.2% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The i-gel Plus appears to be an effective supraglottic airway device that is associated with a high insertion success rate and a reasonably low incidence of complications.

Routine Pre-operative Laboratory Evaluation: Our Experience at an Obstetric and Gynaecological Pre-anaesthetic Check-Up Clinic.

Introduction Laboratory testing is done before surgery to identify body abnormalities that cannot be detected through clinical evaluation alone. Patients going in for low- or intermediate-risk surgeries are often encouraged to undergo a battery of tests as usual. This cross-sectional observational study evaluated the status of routine pre-operative laboratory tests in American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Grade I, II, and III adults undergoing elective surgery at a maternity hospital, as well as the impact of these tests on the outcome of the pre-anaesthetic check-up (PAC). Methods The present observational study was conducted on 500 patients scheduled for elective surgery under anaesthesia. The procedures included routine gynaecological and obstetric surgeries like abdominal hysterectomy, suction evacuation, laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy, diagnostic biopsy, and lower segment caesarean section, among others. A designated anaesthesiologist gathered information from the completed PAC sheets. As per the standard departmental policy, each patient underwent a clinical examination and routine investigations at the PAC clinic. In addition to demographic and other variables, laboratory test results and any peri-operative interventions performed due to abnormalities were assessed. Investigations already done, asked by anaesthesiologists, and referral services sought were noted. The impact of these investigations on anaesthetic decision-making was noted. Data were expressed in frequencies and percentages and statistically analysed using INSTAT software (GraphPad Prism Software Inc., La Zolla, USA). Results The age and weight of the patients range from 20 to 70 years and 55 to 95 kg. Most patients belonged to ASA Grade II (n=348, 69.6%). Hypothyroidism was the most common abnormal finding (n=122, 22.4%). Anaemia, hypertension, and diabetes were detected in n=8 (1.6%), n=82 (16.4%), and n=34 (6.8%) of patients, respectively. In 488 (97.6%) patients, one or more of the investigations from the list were pending. Based on the results of various preoperative laboratory investigations, 87 (17.4%) patients were advised of multiple specialty opinions before surgery. A total of 453 (90.6%) patients attending the clinic were recommended to review their PACs after their pending investigations and specialist consultations were completed. At the same time, n=41 (8.2%) was found to be fit for surgery, and n=6 (1.2%) was found unfit for surgery and was postponed. Conclusions The incidence of tests with abnormal results was a little high in our study. One reason could be that a particular group of patients is included in the study. Preoperative laboratory investigations substantially increase the costs. Not many patients with abnormal tests may require changes in their peri-anaesthetic management. Nonetheless, laboratory tests can help ensure the patient is in an ideal preoperative condition. Pre-operative laboratory investigations should be advised on a case-by-case basis to avoid inconveniencing the patient, delaying the surgical procedure, and driving up the cost of surgical treatment.

Current Management of Diverticulitis.

Over the last few decades, our understanding of the pathophysiology and natural history of sigmoid diverticulitis has greatly improved. This knowledge has challenged many of the traditional principles in the management for diverticulitis, such as routine antibiotic administration in all cases, number-based recommendations for elective surgery, and the necessity for an end colostomy in emergency surgery. This review will cover the breadth of management for sigmoid diverticulitis, covering both uncomplicated and complicated disease as well as elective and emergent disease presentations. New and emerging concepts in management will be highlighted with a particular focus on level-1 data, when available.

The Psychological Burden of Surgery During a Pandemic: Evaluating Preoperative Anxiety in the COVID-19 Era.

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced unprecedented challenges to global healthcare systems, including heightened psychological stress among patients. This study evaluates the preoperative anxiety levels among patients scheduled for surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods This cross-sectional observational study was conducted between April 2020 and March 2022. Adult patients aged 18-80 years, scheduled for elective or emergency surgery, were included. Exclusion criteria were mental illness, impaired communication, and hemodynamic instability. A pre-validated questionnaire addressing demographics, prior surgery exposure, surgery-related anxiety, and COVID-19-related fears was administered. Anxiety levels were scored on a 1-5 Likert scale. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, USA). Results A total of 112 patients participated, with a mean age of 42.3±14.2 years. The majority were female (61 patients, 54.5%), married (96 patients, 85.7%), and resided in urban areas (85 patients, 75.9%). Most patients had no prior surgical history (87 patients, 77.7%). Surgery-related fears were prevalent, with 110 patients (98.2%) fearing surgical complications and 111 patients (99.1%) fearing postoperative pain. COVID-19-related fears were also significant, with 108 patients (96.4%) fearing infection during hospital stay and 100 patients (89.3%) fearing infecting family members. Mild fear was the most common anxiety level (70 patients, 62.95%), followed by moderate fear (25 patients, 22.5%). Discussion The study highlights the dual stressors of surgery and the pandemic, contributing to heightened preoperative anxiety. Findings indicate that significant anxiety levels were present, driven by fears related to surgery, anesthesia, and COVID-19. This aligns with other studies that report high preoperative anxiety levels exacerbated by the pandemic. The comprehensive assessment of anxiety factors underscores the need for tailored interventions to mitigate these anxieties. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly increased preoperative anxiety among surgical patients. Addressing both surgical and pandemic-related anxieties is crucial for improving patient outcomes. Healthcare providers should implement psychological support programs to alleviate these anxieties. Understanding the multifaceted nature of preoperative anxiety during the pandemic can enhance patient care.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Elective Gynecologic Cases Using Modified Medically Necessary, Time Sensitive (MeNTS) Scoring System in the Prioritization of Surgery at the Philippine General Hospital during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Objectives: The use of a scoring system that integrates various factors helps in decision-making and triage for Medically Necessary, Time Sensitive (MeNTS) surgical procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to determine the clinical characteristics and outcomes of cases who were screened and underwent elective gynecologic surgery at a tertiary hospital using the MeNTS tool for prioritization. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out using data collected through medical chart review of all gynecologic cases screened in a 6-month period, from June 18, 2020 to December 18, 2020. Results: A total of 155 gynecologic cases were screened, with 134 (86.4%) MeNTS cases and 21 (13.5%) non-MeNTS cases. The median length of stay (5 days), the median operating room time (3 hours and 30 minutes), and median estimated blood loss (400 ml) were within the acceptable expected outcome as with the scoring system, albeit with some cases (53%) requiring blood transfusion attributed to low baseline hemoglobin levels. There were no cases with post-operative COVID-19 transmission, needing ICU care and intubation, nor mortalities reported. Conclusions: The MeNTS scoring system allowed efficient handling of the backlog of elective gynecologic cases with minimal morbidity and absence of mortality. The study supports the utility of this scoring system in addressing the need of the healthcare system not just to optimally utilize and fairly allocate hospital resources but also to ensure the safety of the patient with the best health service delivery during the pandemic.

Surgical Decision-Making: Who Should Be Offered Sacrocolpopexy?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Women undergoing surgery for apical pelvic organ prolapse have several medically sound options for specific surgical approaches. METHODS: We review the principles of shared decision-making as they pertain to surgery for prolapse. We review the literature supporting the superior sacrocolpopexy as a durable treatment for prolapse and the factors that may differentiate it from other repairs in risk and benefit. RESULTS: We emphasize the importance of collaboration between patients and surgeons in surgical decision-making. CONCLUSION: All medically appropriate patients who desire reconstructive surgery for prolapse should be offered sacrocolpopexy.

Challenges and Solutions during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Hospitalization and Performance in Elective Pediatric Surgeries.

Background and Objectives: This retrospective study aimed to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the most frequently performed elective pediatric surgical procedures and the number of hospitalizations and compare it to the pre-pandemic and post-pandemic periods. Materials and Methods: The subjects were patients under 18 years of age who were regularly admitted for selected elective procedures in a single tertiary center in Croatia from 1 March to 31 August of 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022. Data were collected from the electronic logs of surgical procedures and hospital admissions, logs of one-day surgeries, patients' medical records, and discharge letters. The primary outcome of this study was to determine the evolution of the number of elective surgical procedures before, during, and after the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic; also, we aimed to confirm and objectify global data and statements about the decrease in the number of hospital admissions and surgical procedures. Secondary outcome measures included the length of hospitalization, the number and types of complications, and readmissions. Results: In 2020, the number of elective procedures decreased by 28.3% and the number of hospitalizations decreased by 36.2%; in 2021, the number of elective procedures decreased by 30.8% and the number of hospitalizations decreased by 14.2% compared to the pre-pandemic period (2019). In 2022, there was a 22.8% increase in elective procedures and a 2.9% decrease in hospitalizations compared to 2019. No statistical difference was found in the rates of complications between the individual years studied in terms of complications (p = 0.869). Conclusions: The number of elective procedures and hospitalizations during the COVID-19 pandemic has decreased significantly compared to the pre-pandemic period. After the healthcare system adapted to the conditions of the pandemic, the number of elective procedures increased significantly despite COVID-19, while the number of hospitalizations remained approximately the same as before the pandemic.

Making the cut? Reviewing the quality of surgical care in adults with Crohn's disease.

The National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD) reviewed the quality of care provided to adult patients undergoing surgery for Crohn's disease. The study reviewed elective, and emergency surgical pathways and the report highlighted clinical and organisational changes that should be made to improve patient care and outcomes.

Evaluating the risk of return to the operating room across all elective orthopaedic procedures.

BACKGROUND: Although elective procedures have life-changing potential, all surgeries come with an inherent risk of reoperation. There is a gap in knowledge investigating the risk of reoperation across orthopaedics. We aimed to identify the elective orthopaedic procedures with the highest rate of unplanned reoperation and the reasons for these procedures having such high reoperation rates. METHODS: Patients in the NSQIP database were identified using CPT and ICD-10 codes. We isolated 612,815 orthopaedics procedures from 2018 to 2020 and identified the 10 CPT codes with the greatest rate of unplanned return to the operating room. For each index procedure, we identified the ICD-10 codes for the reoperation procedure and categorized them into infection, mechanical failure, fracture, wound disruption, hematoma or seroma, nerve pathology, other, and unspecified. RESULTS: Below knee amputation (BKA) (CPT 27880) had the highest reoperation rate of 6.92% (37 of 535 patients). Posterior-approach thoracic (5.86%) or cervical (4.14%) arthrodesis and cervical laminectomy (3.85%), revision total hip arthroplasty (5.23%), conversion to total hip arthroplasty (4.33%), and revision shoulder arthroplasty (4.22%) were among the remaining highest reoperation rates. The overall leading causes of reoperation were infection (30.1%), mechanical failure (21.1%), and hematoma or seroma (9.4%) for the 10 procedures with the highest reoperation rates. CONCLUSIONS: This study successfully identified the elective orthopaedic procedures with the highest 30-day return to OR rates. These include BKA, posterior thoracic and cervical spinal arthrodesis, revision hip arthroplasty, revision total shoulder arthroplasty, and cervical laminectomy. With this data, we can identify areas across orthopaedics in which revising protocols may improve patient outcomes and limit the burden of reoperations on patients and the healthcare system. Future studies should focus on the long-term physical and financial impact that these reoperations may have on patients and hospital systems. LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE: IV.

Increasing Rates of Bowel Resection Surgery for Stricturing Crohn's Disease in the Biologic Era.

BACKGROUND: The era of biologics is associated with declining rates of surgery for Crohn's disease (CD), but the impact on surgery for stricturing CD is unknown. Our study aimed to assess nationwide trends in bowel resection surgery for obstruction in CD since the introduction of infliximab for CD in 1998. METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we performed a nationwide analysis, identifying patients hospitalized for CD who underwent bowel resection for an indication of obstruction between 1998 and 2020 (era of biologics). Longitudinal trends in all CD-related resections and resection for obstruction were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression identified patient and hospital characteristics associated with bowel resection surgery for obstruction. RESULTS: Hospitalizations for all CD-related resections decreased from 12.0% of all hospitalizations in 1998 to 6.9% in 2020, while hospitalizations for CD-related resection for obstructive indication increased from 1.3% to 2.0%. The proportion of resections for obstructive indication amongst all CD-related bowel resections increased from 10.8% in 1998 to 29.1% in 2020. In the multivariable models stratified by elective admission, the increasing year was associated with risk of resection for obstructive indication regardless of urgency (nonelective model: odds ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02; elective model: odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04-1.08). CONCLUSIONS: In the era of biologics, our findings demonstrate a decreasing annual rate of CD-related bowel resections but an increase in resection for obstructive indication. Our findings highlight the effect of medical therapy on surgical rates overall but suggest limited impact of current medical therapy on need of resection for stricturing disease.

In our nationwide analysis, rates of bowel resection for patients with Crohn's disease have declined since the approval of infliximab in 1998. However, rates of resection for obstruction in patients with Crohn's disease continue to increase.

The Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic on US Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty Procedures in 2020.

Background: The coronoavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had profound impact on elective procedures in the United States. We characterized the longer-term decline and recovery of hip and knee arthroplasty procedures following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing primary and revision total knee and hip arthroplasty (TKA and THA) in the United States between 2014 and 2020 using claims from a large national commercial payer data set contaivning deidentified information from patients with commercial health coverage. We calculated the percentage of cases lost by month using a forecast model to predict TKA and THA volumes in the absence of COVID-19. We then calculated the association between COVID-19 positivity rates and THA/TKA procedures by state and month. Results: There was a large initial decline in procedures, with primary TKA and THA volumes declining by 93.2% and 87.1% in April 2020, respectively, with revisions seeing more modest declines. Cases quickly recovered with volumes exceeding expected levels in summer months. However, cumulative 2020 volumes remained below expected with 9.7% and 7.5% of expected primary TKA and THA cases lost, respectively. Higher state COVID-19 positivity rates were associated with lower primary TKA, THA, and revision knee procedure rates. Conclusions: After the initial decline in March and April, knee and hip arthroplasty cases resumed quickly; however, by the end of 2020, the annual procedure volume had still not recovered fully. The loss in case volume within states was worse in months with higher COVID-19 positivity rates.

A Comparative Analysis of Prophylactic Antibiotic Administration in Emergency Surgery Versus Elective Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) contribute to increased patient morbidity, prolonged hospital stays, and substantial healthcare costs. Prophylactic antibiotics play a pivotal role in mitigating the risk of SSIs, with their administration being a standard practice before both emergency and elective surgeries. This paper provides a comprehensive review and comparative analysis of the benefits of prophylactic antibiotic administration in emergency surgery versus elective surgery. Through a systematic literature review and analysis of relevant studies identified through PubMed searches, this paper highlights the specific benefits of prophylactic antibiotics between emergency and elective surgeries. The findings underscore the importance of tailored antibiotic regimens and administration protocols to optimize patient care and promote successful surgical outcomes in diverse clinical settings. Further research is warranted to refine guidelines and enhance understanding of the relationship between prophylactic antibiotics and surgical outcomes across different surgical contexts.

Persistent Racial Disparities in Morbidity Following Major Elective Operations.

Introduction: Despite considerable national attention, racial disparities in surgical outcomes persist. We sought to consider whether race-based inequities in outcomes following major elective surgery have improved in the contemporary era. Methods: All adult hospitalization records for elective coronary artery bypass grafting, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, colectomy, and hip replacement were tabulated from the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample. Patients were stratified by Black or White race. To consider the evolution in outcomes, we included an interaction term between race and year. We designated centers in the top quartile of annual procedural volume as high-volume hospitals (HVH). Results: Of ∼2,838,485 patients, 245,405 (8.6%) were of Black race. Following risk-adjustment, Black race was linked with similar odds of in-hospital mortality, but increased likelihood of major complications (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 1.41, 95%Confidence Interval [CI] 1.36-1.47). From 2016-2020, overall risk-adjusted rates of major complications declined (patients of White race: 9.2% to 8.4%; patients of Black race 11.8% to 10.8%, both P < .001). Yet, the delta in risk of adverse outcomes between patients of White and Black race did not significantly change. Of the cohort, 158,060 (8.4%) were treated at HVH. Following adjustment, Black race remained associated with greater odds of morbidity (AOR 1.37, CI 1.23-1.52; Ref:White). The race-based difference in risk of complications at HVH did not significantly change from 2016 to 2020. Conclusion: While overall rates of complications following major elective procedures declined from 2016 to 2020, patients of Black race faced persistently greater risk of adverse outcomes. Novel interventions are needed to address persistent racial disparities and ensure acceptable outcomes for all patients.

The impact of COVID-19 on surgical cases at a large quaternary referral hospital.

Introduction: Coronavirus-19 (COVID) stressed healthcare systems by increasing hospital admissions and in-hospital mortality. The impact of COVID on surgical patients is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how the COVID pandemic affected surgical patients at a large quaternary referral hospital. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing surgical procedures was performed to evaluate patients undergoing surgery. The impact of COVID on surgical patients was divided into four timeframes based on government regulations: pre-COVID (January 1, 2020 to March 15, 2020), suspended (March 16, 2020 to May 4, 2020), backlogged cases (May 5, 2020 to June 14, 2020), and restoration (June 15, 2020 to September 30, 2020). Differences between patient characteristics and outcomes during these timeframes were evaluated. Results: A total of 21,424 surgical cases were performed between January 1, 2020 and September 30, 2020. During the suspended timeframe (when all elective cases were cancelled), the percentage of surgeries increased in men (53.8% compared to 49.2% pre-COVID; P < 0.01), in Black and Hispanic patients (23.1% and 15.3%, respectively; P < 0.05), and in Medicaid and self-pay patients (16.3% compared to 9.9% pre-COVID; P < 0.01). All service lines experienced similar trends in overall case volume except obstetrics (constant), trauma, vascular, and thoracic (which increased during the suspended timeframe). Conclusions: COVID-19 induced stresses in surgical patients, altering payor mix and impacting minority groups at a large quaternary referral hospital.