Hinotori™ robotic esophagectomy: a feasibility cadaver study.

This preclinical feasibility study investigates the potential of utilizing the hinotori™ robot system for esophagectomy. In three human cadaver models, the esophagus was successfully mobilized and resected using the hinotori™ system, with a mean thoracic procedure time of 57 minutes. The system allowed for precise dissection and radical lymphadenectomy without arm collision, attributed to its versatile design and docking-free trocars. Standard robot-specific patient positioning, including a 35° left lateral inclination, and trocar placement in a posterior axillary line configuration were employed. Notably, trocars suitable for both laparoscopy and the hinotori™ robot were utilized, providing flexibility in trocar selection. Unique features, such as the ergonomic console and pointer-based pivot point identification system, contributed to procedural success. While these findings highlight the promising potential of the hinotori™ system in advancing esophageal surgery, further clinical studies are warranted to validate its reproducibility and clinical utility. Additionally, enhancements to the pivot point identification system and evaluation of the arm base's features may further optimize surgical outcomes.

Design of a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 48-week study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cendakimab in adult and adolescent patients with eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory condition that interferes with normal food ingestion, negatively impacting quality of life (QoL). Treatment options include proton pump inhibitors, corticosteroids, biologics, or dietary elimination; however, ∼1/3 of patients remain insufficiently controlled. The pathogenesis of EoE involves interleukin-13 (IL-13); therefore, targeted IL-13 inhibition may be beneficial. In a phase 2 study, cendakimab, a recombinant, humanized anti-IL-13 monoclonal antibody, significantly reduced mean esophageal eosinophil counts and improved other inflammatory parameters in patients with EoE. These findings prompted further investigation of the efficacy and safety of cendakimab in adults and adolescents with EoE in a phase 3 registrational study (NCT04753697), the design of which is presented here. METHODS: This multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 48-week, treat-through study plans to enroll 399 adults and adolescents. Randomized patients (1:1:1) will receive subcutaneous administration of 1) cendakimab 360 mg once weekly (QW) for 48 weeks, 2) cendakimab 360 mg QW for 24 weeks followed by cendakimab 360 mg every other week (with matching placebo on alternative weeks to maintain the blind) for 24 weeks, or 3) placebo QW for 48 weeks. Co-primary endpoints are mean change from baseline in dysphagia days and proportion of patients with eosinophil histologic response, defined as peak esophageal eosinophil count ≤6 per high-power field, at 24 weeks. Secondary and exploratory endpoints will address endoscopic and histologic features, QoL, safety, and pharmacokinetic assessments. CONCLUSION: This phase 3 pivotal study will determine whether cendakimab provides an effective, safe, targeted treatment for patients with EoE.

Causal effects of genetically determined metabolites and metabolite ratios on esophageal diseases: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal diseases (ED) are a kind of common diseases of upper digestive tract. Previous studies have proved that metabolic disorders are closely related to the occurrence and development of ED. However, there is a lack of evidence for causal relationships between metabolites and ED, as well as between metabolite ratios representing enzyme activities and ED. Herein, we explored the causality of genetically determined metabolites (GDMs) on ED through Mendelian Randomization (MR) study. METHODS: Two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis was used to assess the causal effects of genetically determined metabolites and metabolite ratios on ED. A genome-wide association analysis (GWAS) encompassing 850 individual metabolites along with 309 metabolite ratios served as the exposures. Meanwhile, the outcomes were defined by 10 types of ED phenotypes, including Congenital Malformations of Esophagus (CME), Esophageal Varices (EV), Esophageal Obstructions (EO), Esophageal Ulcers (EU), Esophageal Perforations (EP), Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), Esophagitis, Barrett's Esophagus (BE), Benign Esophageal Tumors (BETs), and Malignant Esophageal Neoplasms (MENs). The standard inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was applied to estimate the causal relationship between exposure and outcome. Sensitivity analyses were carried out using multiple methods, including MR-Egger, Weighted Median, MR-PRESSO, Cochran's Q test, and leave-one-out analysis. P < 0.05 was conventionally considered statistically significant. After applying the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing, a threshold of P < 4.3E-05 (0.05/1159) was regarded as indicative of a statistically significant causal relationship. Furthermore, metabolic pathway analysis was performed using the web-based MetaboAnalyst 6.0 software. RESULTS: The findings revealed that initially, a total of 869 candidate causal association pairs ( P ivw < 0.05) were identified, involving 442 metabolites, 145 metabolite ratios and 10 types of ED. However, upon applying the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing, only 36 pairs remained significant, involving 28 metabolites (predominantly lipids and amino acids), 5 metabolite ratios and 6 types of ED. Sensitivity analyses and reverse MR were performed for these 36 causal association pairs, where the results showed that the pair of EV and 1-(1-enyl-palmitoyl)-2-linoleoyl-GPE (p-16:0/18:2) did not withstand the sensitivity tests, and Hexadecenedioate (C16:1-DC) was found to have a reverse causality with GERD. The final 34 robust causal pairs included 26 metabolites, 5 metabolite ratios and 5 types of ED. The involved 26 metabolites predominantly consisted of methylated nucleotides, glycine derivatives, sex hormones, phospholipids, bile acids, fatty acid dicarboxylic acid derivatives, and N-acetylated amino acids. Furthermore, through metabolic pathway analysis, we uncovered 8 significant pathways that played pivotal roles in five types of ED conditions. CONCLUSIONS: This study integrated genomics with metabolomics to assess causal relationships between ED and both metabolites and metabolite ratios, uncovering several key metabolic features in ED pathogenesis. These findings have potential as novel biomarkers for ED and provide insights into the disease's etiology and progression. However, further clinical and experimental validations are necessary.

Unraveling the impact of irritability on esophageal diseases: Insights from multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested a potential association between irritability and the risk of various diseases. However, establishing a causal relationship has remained a significant challenge. To address this issue, we employed Mendelian randomization (MR), a sophisticated approach that leverages genotype data to emulate the conditions of randomized controlled trials. This method enables us to investigate the potential causal link between irritability and the susceptibility to esophageal diseases. METHODS: We conducted an extensive multivariable MR analysis using summary-level data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) encompassing various esophageal diseases, including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), esophageal cancer (EC), and Barrett's esophagus. Both univariable and multivariable MR analyses were performed to elucidate and confirm the causal association between genetically predicted irritability and the incidence of esophageal diseases. RESULTS: Based on our primary causal effects model utilizing MR analyses with the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method, genetically predicted irritability was identified as a risk factor for GERD (OR = 2.413; 95 % CI: 1.678-3.470; P = 2.03E-06) and Barrett's esophagus (OR = 2.306; 95 % CI: 1.042-5.101; P = 0.039). However, irritability was not found to be associated with the risk of EC, even after adjusting for BMI, smoking initiation, and alcohol consumption. CONCLUSION: The multivariable MR analysis performed in this study demonstrated a causal relationship between irritability and esophageal diseases. It is imperative to acknowledge the need for further large-scale prospective studies to validate these findings.

The causal relationship between COVID-19 and ten esophageal diseases: a study utilizing Mendelian randomization.

Background: Clinical signs of dysphagia, pancreatic achalasia, and esophagitis have been reported in patients with COVID-19. However, the causal relationship between COVID-19 and esophageal diseases is not clear. Therefore, we utilized Mendelian randomization to explore the potential association between COVID-19 and esophageal diseases. Methods: The summary statistics for a Genome-wide association study (GWAS) were obtained from The COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative, encompassing four types of COVID-19 as exposure: severe COVID-19, hospitalized COVID-19 versus ambulatory COVID-19, hospitalized COVID-19 versus uninfected, and confirmed COVID-19. Additionally, summary statistics for ten esophageal diseases as outcomes were sourced from the GWAS Catalog and FinnGen databases. Univariate Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was utilized to thoroughly investigate and validate the potential causal association between COVID-19 and various esophageal conditions, including esophageal varices, Barrett's esophagus, esophagitis, esophageal obstruction, esophageal ulcer, esophageal perforation, gastroesophageal reflux, congenital esophageal malformations, benign esophageal tumors, and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Results: An inverse variance-weighted (IVW) model was utilized for univariate Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, which revealed that genetic liability in patients with confirmed COVID-19 was associated with esophageal obstruction (OR [95% CI]: 0.5275458 [0.2822400-0.9860563]; p-value = 0.0450699). Furthermore, a suggestive causal association was found between genetic liability and a reduced risk of benign esophageal tumors (OR [95% CI]: 0.2715453 [0.09368493-0.7870724]; p-value = 0.0163510), but with a suggestively increased risk of congenital esophageal malformations (OR [95% CI]: 6.959561 [1.1955828-40.51204]; p-value = 0.03086835). Additionally, genetic liability in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, compared to non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients, was suggestively associated with an increased risk of esophagitis (OR [95% CI]: 1.443859 [1.0890568-1.914252]; p-value = 0.01068201). The reliability of these causal findings is supported by Cochran's Q statistic and the MR-Egger intercept test. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest the existence of a causal relationship between COVID-19 and esophageal diseases, highlighting differing risk effects of COVID-19 on distinct esophageal conditions.

Long-term Outcome of Asymptomatic Esophageal Eosinophilia.

Background/Aims: : Asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia (aEE), characterized by eosinophil infiltration in the esophagus without clinical symptoms, has been reported as a precursor of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Nevertheless, no report exists on the long-term clinical course of the disease. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical course of aEE over 5 years, including the symptomatic conversion rate and the effect of treatments. Methods: : We reviewed 28 patients with aEE who had been followed up for over 5 years with endoscopic monitoring. The basal characteristics of patients were compared with those of 58 patients diagnosed with EoE during the same period. Patients' clinicopathological findings were collected and examined. Results: : No significant differences in basal characteristics and histopathological findings were observed between the patients with aEE and those with EoE. The median follow-up duration was 64 months. Among the 28 patients with aEE, seven were treated with proton pump inhibitor or potassium-competitive acid blocker and the remaining 21 opted for follow-up with no medication. Among the treated patients, six (85.7%) exhibited endoscopic and pathologic improvements. Among the cases followed up without medication, the findings worsened in two (9.5%), improved spontaneously in seven (33.3%), and were unchanged in 12 (57.1%), and three (14.3%) developed symptoms at a mean time of 40 months. Symptoms developed in cases where endoscopic and pathologic findings remained unchanged or worsened during follow-up. Conclusions: : Some patients with aEE had improved findings without treatment, whereas others developed symptoms, emphasizing the importance of long-term monitoring and individualized treatment decisions.

Detachable string magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy for the noninvasive diagnosis of esophageal diseases: A prospective, blind clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Traditional esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), an invasive examination method, can cause discomfort and pain in patients. In contrast, magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE), a noninvasive method, is being applied for the detection of stomach and small intestinal diseases, but its application in treating esophageal diseases is not widespread. AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of detachable string MCE (ds-MCE) for the diagnosis of esophageal diseases. METHODS: Fifty patients who had been diagnosed with esophageal diseases were prospectively recruited for this clinical study and underwent ds-MCE and conventional EGD. The primary endpoints included the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of ds-MCE for patients with esophageal diseases. The secondary endpoints consisted of visualizing the esophageal and dentate lines, as well as the subjects' tolerance of the procedure. RESULTS: Using EGD as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of ds-MCE for esophageal disease detection were 85.71%, 86.21%, 81.82%, 89.29%, and 86%, respectively. ds-MCE was more comfortable and convenient than EGD was, with 80% of patients feeling that ds-MCE examination was very comfortable or comfortable and 50% of patients believing that detachable string v examination was very convenient. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that ds-MCE has the same diagnostic effects as traditional EGD for esophageal diseases and is more comfortable and convenient than EGD, providing a novel noninvasive method for treating esophageal diseases.

Endoscopic self-expandable metal stent versus endoscopy vacuum therapy for traumatic esophageal perforations: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic esophageal perforations (TEP) are a grave medical condition and require immediate intervention. Techniques such as Esophageal Self-Expandable Metal Stent (E-SEMS) and Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy (EVT) show promise in reducing tissue damage and controlling esophageal leakage. The present study aims to compare the application of EVT to E-SEMS placement in TEP. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study valuated 30 patients with TEP. The E-SEMS and EVT groups were assessed for time of hospitalization, treatment duration, costs, and clinical outcome. RESULTS: Patients treated with EVT (24.4 ± 13.2) demonstrated significantly shorter treatment duration (p < 0.005) compared to the group treated with E-SEMS (45.8 ± 12.9) and patients submitted to E-SEMS demonstrated a significant reduction (p = 0.02) in the time of hospitalization compared to the EVT (34 ± 2 vs 82 ± 5 days). Both groups demonstrated a satisfactory discharge rate (E-SEMS 93.7% vs EVT 71.4%) but did not show statistically significant difference (p = 0.3155). E-SEMS treatment had a lower mean cost than EVT (p < 0.05). Descriptive statistics were utilized, arranged in table form, where frequencies, percentages, mean, median, and standard deviation of the study variables were calculated and counted. The Fisher's Exact Test was used to evaluate the relationship between two categorical variables. To evaluate differences between means and central points, the parametric t-test was utilized. Comparisons with p value up to 0.05 were considered significant. CONCLUSION: E-SEMS showed a shorter time of hospitalization, but a longer duration of treatment compared to EVT. The placement of E-SEMS and EVT had the same clinical outcome. Treatment with E-SEMS had a lower cost compared with EVT.

Measuring and improving quality in esophageal care and swallowing disorders.

Evaluating clinical care through quality-related metrics is increasingly common. There are now numerous quality statements and indicators related to the medical management of benign and pre-malignant esophageal diseases. Expert consensus leveraging evidence-based recommendations from published society guidelines has been the most frequently used basis for developing esophageal quality statements. While surgical care of patients with esophageal malignancies, including squamous cell carcinoma, has also been developed, those related to benign esophageal disease now include domains of diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring for gastroesophageal reflux disease, eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), achalasia, and Barrett's esophagus (BE). Several recent studies evaluating adherence to quality metrics affirm substantial variation in practice patterns with opportunities for improvement in care across esophageal diseases. In particular, patient education regarding treatment options in achalasia, frequency of esophageal biopsies among patients with dysphagia to evaluate for EoE, and endoscopic evaluation within a BE segment are areas identified to have need for improvement. As the management of esophageal diseases becomes more complex and interdisciplinary, adherence to quality metrics may be a source of standardization and improvement in delivery and ultimately patient outcomes. Indeed, the development of national quality databases has resulted in a significant growth in the use of these metrics for quality improvement activities and may form the basis for future inclusion in quality reporting and payment programs.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy compared to laparoscopic Heller myotomy and pneumatic dilation in the treatment of achalasia: a systematic review.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an intervention for the treatment of achalasia which has gained popularity over the last decade. It's efficacy and invasiveness are comparable to laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM). The purpose of this systematic review is to compare POEM to existing therapies. The systematic review was performed following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Libraries were searched using keywords: esophageal achalasia, POEM, LHM, pneumatic dilation (PD), and related terms. The studied outcomes were Eckardt score, clinical success, hospital stay, cost-utility analysis, complications, and post-treatment gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Articles were reviewed by one researcher and uncertainty was resolved by a second researcher. The search strategy retrieved 1948 citations. After removing duplicates and applying the exclusion criteria, 91 studies were selected for full-text review of which a total of 31 studies were considered eligible for further analysis, including two studies which were found through manual searching. POEM has improved efficacy compared to PD with similar cost-effectiveness. POEM results showed comparable patient outcomes when compared with laparoscopic myotomy. Overall, POEM is a feasible first-line treatment for achalasia.

Development and validation of a universal esophageal patient-reported outcome measure: The Cleveland Clinic Esophageal Questionnaire (CEQ).

OBJECTIVE: Currently, there is no validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) applicable to all esophageal diseases. Our objective was to create a psychometrically robust, validated universal esophageal PROM that can also objectively assess patients' quality of life (QoL). METHODS: The pilot PROM constructed based on expert opinions, literature review, and previous unpublished institutional research had 27 items covering 8 domains. It was completed by 30 patients in the outpatient clinic followed by a structured debriefing interview, which allowed for refining the PROM. The final PROM: Cleveland Clinic Esophageal Questionnaire (CEQ) included 34 items across 6 domains (Dysphagia, Eating, Pain, Reflux & Regurgitation, Dyspepsia, Dumping), each accompanied by a corresponding QoL component. Further psychometric assessment of the PROM was conducted by evaluating (1) acceptability, (2) construct validity, (3) reliability, and (4) responsiveness. RESULTS: Five hundred forty-six unique patients (median 63.7 years [54.3-71.7], 53% male [287], 86% White) completed CEQ at >90% completion within 5 minutes. Construct validity was demonstrated by differentiating scores across esophageal cancer (n = 146), achalasia (n = 170), hiatal hernia (n = 160), and other diagnoses (n = 70). Internal reliability (Cronbach alpha 0.83-0.89), and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.63-0.85) were strong. Responsiveness was demonstrated through CEQ domains improving for 53 patients who underwent surgery for achalasia or hiatal hernia (Cohen d 0.86-2.59). CONCLUSIONS: We have constructed a psychometrically robust, universal esophageal PROM that allows concise, consistent, objective quantification of symptoms and their effect on the patient. The CEQ is valuable in prognostication and tracking of longitudinal outcomes in both benign and malignant esophageal diseases.

Feasibility and safety of per-oral endoscopic septotomy for Killian-Jamieson diverticulum: Case series with video.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Killian-Jamieson diverticulum (KJD) is a relatively uncommon variant of pharyngoesophageal diverticula, distinct from the more prevalent Zenker diverticulum. However, literature on endoscopic management of KJD remains limited. This study aimed to elucidate the efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic septotomy (POES) as a treatment approach for symptomatic KJD. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, we investigated the outcomes of nine consecutive patients who underwent POES for KJD between January 2019 and May 2023. Follow-up data of at least 2 months post-treatment were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was the technical success rate of POES. Secondary outcomes encompassed the clinical success rate, defined as symptomatic improvement 2 months after POES, and the incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: All patients presented with dysphagia, with a median symptom duration of 6 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 3-12 months). The median diverticulum size was 32 mm (IQR: 24-42 mm). The median duration of the operation time was 66 min (IQR: 60-109). A 100% technical success rate was achieved, with complete closure of the defect in all cases. There were no adverse events related to this treatment. The median hospitalization duration was 5 days (IQR: 4-6), and the clinical success rate was 88.9%. Follow-up barium esophagograms exhibited significant improvement in the flow of the barium for all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the relatively limited case volume, our findings underscore that POES is a safe and efficacious approach for managing symptomatic KJD.

Esophageal tumors: The keys to diagnosis by pneumo-computed tomography.

OBJECTIVE: To review and describe the most characteristic radiological findings of the most frequent esophageal tumor lesions, with emphasis on the esophago-gastric distention technique pneumo-computed tomography performed in our institution. To know the main advantage of this distension technique. CONCLUSION: Malignant tumor lesions (predominantly squamous cell carcinoma in the mid esophagus and adenocarcinoma in the distal esophagus) present as asymmetric wall thickening, mucosal irregularity, or mass extending into adjacent organs with lymph node involvement. Benign tumors (mainly leiomyoma being the most frequent and others such as lipoma) present as endoluminal growth, with defined borders and homogeneous attenuation. Post-contrast enhancement is scarce or moderate. The technique of computed tomography pneumotomography technique achieves an additional distension of the esophageal lumen in all cases. It allows delimiting the superior and inferior borders of the lesions, helping the surgeon to define the therapeutic strategy.

Endoluminal Procedures and Devices for Esophageal Tract Investigation: A Critical Review.

Diseases of the esophageal tract represent a heterogeneous class of pathological conditions for which diagnostic paradigms continue to emerge. In the last few decades, innovative diagnostic devices have been developed, and several attempts have been made to advance and standardize diagnostic algorithms to be compliant with medical procedures. To the best of our knowledge, a comprehensive review of the procedures and available technologies to investigate the esophageal tract was missing in the literature. Therefore, the proposed review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of available endoluminal technologies and procedures to investigate esophagus health conditions. The proposed systematic review was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Studies have been divided into categories based on the type of evaluation and measurement that the investigated technology provides. In detail, three main categories have been identified, i.e., endoluminal technologies for the (i) morphological, (ii) bio-mechanical, and (iii) electro-chemical evaluation of the esophagus.

Hospitalization Trends and Outcomes of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in the United States: A Decade-Long Nationwide Analysis.

Background Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic antigen-mediated esophageal disease characterized by infiltration of the esophageal mucosa by eosinophils. The prevalence of EoE continues to rise worldwide. However, certain aspects of the epidemiology and pathogenesis remain unclear. Methods This study examined the hospitalization trends of EoE using an extensive inpatient database in the United States, the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS), to identify hospitalizations between 2010 and 2019. We assessed patient demographics as well as hospital-specific variables using the NIS. We obtained the prevalence rate of EoE for each year and used joinpoint regression analysis to obtain trends after adjusting the rate for age and gender. We also sought to characterize the outcomes of these hospitalizations by obtaining the mortality rate, length of stay (LOS), and total hospital charges (THC). Results Of 305 million hospitalizations included in the study, 33,878 were for EoE. The prevalence rate per 100,000 hospitalizations of EoE increased from 6.6 in 2010 to 15.5 in 2019. The annual percentage change obtained from the joinpoint regression analysis was 13.3% from 2010 to 2014 and 7.2% from 2014 to 2019. Most of the hospitalizations were among the male gender and young adults. Almost 95% of hospitalizations across the study period were seen in urban hospitals. We did not notice any significant trend in the mortality rates or length of stay over the study period. The THC increased significantly across the study period. Conclusion There has been an upward trend in the average prevalence rate of EoE over the decade from 2010 to 2019 which almost parallels that of inflammatory bowel disease. This represents a significant burden of disease for a condition that was initially recognized in the late 20th century.

Necrosis esofágica aguda (esófago negro) asociado a neoplasias digestivas / Acute esophageal necrosis (black esophagus) associated with digestive neoplasms

INTRODUCCIÓN. La necrosis esofágica aguda es un síndrome raro que se caracteriza endoscópicamente por una apariencia negra circunferencial irregular o difusa de la mucosa esofágica intratorácica, la afectación es generalmente del esófago distal y la transición abrupta de mucosa normal en la unión gastroesofágica, con extensión proximal variable. CASOS. Se presentan dos casos con diferentes comorbiliades, presentación de signos y síntomas, antecedentes y tratamiento, teniendo en común el diagnóstico a través de endoscopía digestiva alta. RESULTADOS. Caso clínico 1: tratamiento clínico basado en hidratación, suspensión de vía oral, omeprazol intravenoso y sucralfato; mala evolución clínica caracterizada por: disfagia, intolerancia oral y recurrencia del sangrado digestivo alto, se realiza colocación de gastrostomía endoscópica. Caso clínico 2: esófago con mucosa con fibrina y parches de necrosis extensa, se realiza compensación tanto de foco infeccioso pulmonar como hidratación y nutrición, en estudios complementarios se observa masa colónica, con estudio histopatológico confirmatorio de adenocarcinoma de colon en estado avanzado. DISCUSIÓN. La esofagitis necrotizante aguda es una entidad inusual, de baja prevalencia e incidencia, asociada con estados de hipoperfusión sistémica y múltiples comorbilidades que favorezcan un sustrato isquémico. Al revisar los reportes de casos que hay en la literatura médica, los casos que reportamos se correlaciona con las características clínicas, epidemiológicas, endoscópicas y factores de riesgo causales de la enfermedad. La presentación clínica más frecuente es el sangrado digestivo alto, que se debe correlacionar con el hallazgo endoscópico clásico. Nuestro primer caso reportado termina con la colocación de una gastrostomía para poder alimentarse. CONCLUSIÓN. El pronóstico de la necrosis esofágica aguda es malo y se requiere un alto índice de sospecha clínica y conocimiento de esta infrecuente patología para un diagnóstico temprano y un manejo oportuno. Se requiere una evaluación por endoscopia digestiva alta. Es una causa de sangrado gastrointestinal que conlleva tasas altas de mortalidad, principalmente en adultos mayores frágiles. El reconocimiento temprano y la reanimación agresiva son los principios fundamentales para un mejor resultado de la enfermedad.

INTRODUCTION. Acute esophageal necrosis is a rare syndrome that is characterized endoscopically by an irregular or diffuse circumferential black appearance of the intrathoracic esophageal mucosa, the involvement is generally of the distal esophagus and the abrupt transition of normal mucosa at the gastroesophageal junction, with variable proximal extension. CASES. Two cases are presented with different comorbidities, presentation of signs and symptoms, history and treatment, having in common the diagnosis through upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. RESULTS. Clinical case 1: clinical treatment based on hydration, oral suspension, intravenous omeprazole and sucralfate; poor clinical evolution characterized by: dysphagia, oral intolerance and recurrence of upper digestive bleeding, endoscopic gastrostomy placement was performed. Clinical case 2: esophagus with mucosa with fibrin and patches of extensive necrosis, compensation of both the pulmonary infectious focus and hydration and nutrition is performed, in complementary studies a colonic mass is observed, with a confirmatory histopathological study of colon adenocarcinoma in an advanced state. DISCUSSION. Acute necrotizing esophagitis is an unusual entity, with low prevalence and incidence, associated with states of systemic hypoperfusion and multiple comorbidities that favor an ischemic substrate. When reviewing the case reports in the medical literature, the cases we report correlate with the clinical, epidemiological, endoscopic characteristics and causal risk factors of the disease. The most common clinical presentation is upper gastrointestinal bleeding, which must be correlated with the classic endoscopic finding. Our first reported case ends with the placement of a gastrostomy to be able to feed. CONCLUSION. The prognosis of acute esophageal necrosis is poor and a high index of clinical suspicion and knowledge of this rare pathology is required for early diagnosis and timely management. Evaluation by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is required. It is a cause of gastrointestinal bleeding that carries high mortality rates, mainly in frail older adults. Early recognition and aggressive resuscitation are the fundamental principles for a better outcome of the disease.

Upper Esophageal Sphincter Metrics across Eosinophilic Esophagitis, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Functional Dysphagia: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have evaluated the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) with high-resolution manometry (HRM) in some esophageal diseases, but not eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). The aim of our study was to evaluate the function of the UES across EoE, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), functional dysphagia (FD), and the relationship with esophageal symptoms, esophageal body contraction, and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) metrics. METHODS: HRM was performed on 30 EoE, 18 GERD, and 29 FD patients according to the Chicago Classification 3.0. The study data were exported to the online analysis platform Swallow Gateway. The UES was assessed in terms of UES Resting Pressure (UES-RP), UES Basal Pressure (UES-BP), UES Integrated Relaxation Pressure (UES-IRP), UES Relaxation Time (UES-RT), Basal UES Contractile Integral (Basal UES-CI), Post-Deglutitive UES Contractile Integral (Post-Deglutitive UES-CI), and Proximal Contractile Integral (PCI). RESULTS: ANOVA analysis showed significantly higher values of Post-Deglutitive UES-CI in EoE patients compared with FD patients (p = 0.001). Basal UES-CI and UES-RP showed significantly higher values in EoE (p = 0.002, p = 0.038) and GERD (p < 0.001, p = 0.001) patients compared with FD patients. Correlations between LES-CI and Post-Deglutitive UES-CI, Basal UES-CI, and UES-RP (p ≤ 0.001, p = 0.027, p = 0.017, respectively), and between LES-BP and Post-Deglutitive UES-CI (p = 0.019), independent of diagnosis, were shown. No correlations have been demonstrated between the UES, EGJ metrics, and esophageal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Some differences in UES metrics in the three different diseases were found. Further studies are needed to confirm the results of our pilot study and possible applications in clinical practice.

Reemplazo esofágico mínimamente invasivo con tubo de Akiyama en un paciente pediátrico con quemadura esofágica / Minimally invasive esophageal replacement with Akiyama tube in a pediatric patient with esophageal burn

Introducción. La ingesta de cáusticos continúa siendo un problema de salud pública en los países en vía de desarrollo, por lo que a veces es necesario realizar un reemplazo esofágico en estos pacientes. Aún no existe una técnica estandarizada para este procedimiento. Caso clínico. Masculino de 10 años con estenosis esofágica por ingesta de cáusticos, quien no mejoró con las dilataciones endoscópicas. Se realizó un ascenso gástrico transhiatal por vía ortotópica mediante cirugía mínimamente invasiva como manejo quirúrgico definitivo .Discusión. Actualmente existen varios tipos de injertos usados en el reemplazo esofágico. La interposición colónica y gástrica son las que cuentan con mayores estudios, mostrando resultados similares. Conclusiones. La elección del tipo y posición del injerto debe ser individualizada, tomando en cuenta las características de las lesiones y la anatomía de cada paciente para aumentar la tasa de éxito.

Introduction. The ingestion of caustics continues to be a public health problem in developing countries, which is why sometimes is necessary to perform an esophageal replacement in these patients. There is still no standardized technique for this procedure. Clinical case. A 10-year-old male with esophageal stricture due to caustic ingestion, who did not improve with endoscopic dilations. A laparoscopic transhiatal gastric lift was performed orthotopically as definitive surgical management using minimally invasive surgery. Discussion. Currently there are several types of grafts used in esophageal replacement. Colonic and gastric interposition are the ones that have the most studies, showing similar results. Conclusions. Choice of type and position of the graft must be individualized, taking into account the characteristics of the lesions and anatomy of each patient, in order to increase the success rate.

Esophageal microflora in esophageal diseases.

With the development of endoscopic technology, an increasing number of patients with esophageal disease are being diagnosed, although the underlying pathogenesis of many esophageal diseases remains unclear. In recent years, a large number of studies have demonstrated that the occurrence and development of various intestinal diseases were related to intestinal flora. As a result, researchers have shifted their focus towards investigating esophageal flora to better understand the pathogenesis, early diagnosis, and treatment of esophageal diseases. This paper reviewed the normal esophageal flora and the changes of esophageal flora under different esophageal disease states. It was observed that there are distinct differences in the composition of esophageal microflora among Gastroesophageal Reflux, Barrett's esophagus, eosinophilic esophagitis and normal esophagus. The normal esophageal flora was dominated by gram-positive bacteria, particularly Streptococcus, while the esophageal flora under esophagitis was dominated by gram-negative bacteria. Furthermore, the diversity of esophageal flora is significantly decreased in patients with esophageal cancer. Several potential microbial biomarkers for esophageal cancer have been identified, among which Fusobacterium nucleatum showed a close association with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma's pathological stage and clinical stage.

Diagnosis of Eosinophilic Esophagitis at the Time of Esophageal Food Impaction.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal food impactions (EFI) often precede a diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EOE). Current guidelines suggest obtaining esophageal biopsies upon suspicion of EOE, treating with proton pump inhibitor (PPI), and repeating esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). This study was conducted to determine provider practice patterns with these mentioned recommendations at the time of EFI. METHODS: In this retrospective study, key outcomes were the proportion of patients who had EOE mucosal biopsies, EOE diagnosis, PPI initiation, and recommendations and completions of repeat EGD. Differences in outcomes among age, sex, race, off-hours time of procedure, and trainee involvement were examined. EOE diagnosis predictors were explored with logistic regression. RESULTS: Twenty-nine percent of the patients had esophageal biopsies taken at the time of index EGD (iEGD). Sixteen patients were diagnosed with EOE at the time of index EFI, while fourteen patients were diagnosed on subsequent EGDs. Among those diagnosed with EOE at iEGD, 94% were placed on PPI. Of patients with confirmed EOE on index biopsy, 63% of patients were recommended repeat EGD, of which 50% completed it within 90 days. Older age was protective of EOE diagnosis while no GERD history and endoscopist suspicion of EOE predicted diagnosis of EOE. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopists uncommonly take biopsies at the time of EFI, which may delay diagnosis and treatment of EOE.