Development of an evidence-based nursing practice course framework for undergraduate nursing students from a perspective of academic-practice partnerships: A Delphi study.

AIM: To develop an evidence-based nursing practice course framework for undergraduate nursing students from a perspective of academic-practice partnerships. BACKGROUND: Academic-practice partnerships could play a crucial role in bridging theory-practice gap in evidence-based nursing education. However, there is a lack of evidence-based nursing practice course framework for undergraduate nursing students from a perspective of academic-practice partnerships. DESIGN: A Delphi study. METHODS: The Delphi study was conducted by literature analysis, qualitative interview and Delphi expert consultation to develop this course framework. 15 and 12 experts were involved in round one and round two of Delphi expert consultation, respectively. The consensus threshold of two-round Delphi expert consultation was described by expert's positive coefficient (≥ 50 %), positive coefficient (≥ 70 %), expert authority coefficient (≥ 0.7), coefficient of variation (<0.25) and full score frequency (>20 %). RESULTS: The final course framework includes learning objectives (17 items); teaching chapters of theoretical classes (five items); teaching contents (30 items), methods (12 items) and class hours (9 items) of theoretical classes; and the responsibilities of academic teachers (11 items) and clinical teachers (11 items) in practical classes. CONCLUSION: The course framework developed by this study could provide guidance for evidence-based nursing education of undergraduate nursing students. The effectiveness of this course framework should be verified through further experimental studies in the future.

A study on the effect of clinical intervention of evidence-based nursing measures on complications in patients after breast-conserving surgery.

BACKGROUND: Breast-conserving surgery is an important treatment for breast cancer, which not only eradicates the disease, but also protects the integrity of the breast, however, postoperative nausea and vomiting often bother patients. OBJECTIVE: This study examines the effects of evidence-based nursing practices on nausea and vomiting in patients after breast-conserving surgery, with the aim of providing new perspectives for clinical nursing practice. METHODS: One hundred and sixty patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery from January 2023 to December 2023 in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center were enrolled. The patients were divided into an intervention group (evidence-based nursing group) and a control group (conventional nursing group) using the random number table method, both groups comprised 80 patients. The control group used conventional nursing methods, and the intervention group added evidence-based nursing intervention on this basis. Comparative analysis focused on the incidence of nausea and vomiting, quality of life metrics, and postoperative satisfaction. RESULTS: In the intervention group, notably lower incidence rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting were observed compared to the control group within both the 0-24 hour and 24-48-hour postoperative periods (P< 0.05). Furthermore, the intervention group exhibited significantly higher scores across all five dimensions as well as the overall score of the FACT-B scale in comparison to the control group (P< 0.05), accompanied by heightened satisfaction with the nursing staff. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the positive clinical intervention effects of evidence-based nursing measures and emphasized their importance in improving postoperative nausea and vomiting and quality of life. Future studies are expected to incorporate evidence-based nursing practices into nursing care to improve patient recovery and overall quality of care.

Best evidence summary for aspiration prevention and management in critically ill patients with nasogastric feeding.

AIM: To evaluate and summarize the available evidence on the prevention and management of nasogastric aspiration in critically ill patients to inform the development of evidence-based clinical practice. DESIGN: This study was an evidence summary according to the evidence summary reporting standard of the Fudan University Center for Evidence-Based Nursing. METHOD: According to the '6S' model of evidence resources, evidence on the prevention and management of aspiration in critically ill patients on nasogastric feeding was retrieved, including clinical decision-making, best practices, guidelines, evidence summaries, expert consensus and systematic evaluations. DATA: UpToDate, BMJ Best Practice, JBI, National Guideline Clearing-house, Guidelines International Network, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Registered Nurses Association of Ontario, Yi Mai tong Guidelines Network, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, OVID, Sinomed, CNKI, Wan Fang database. The search period was from January 2013 to June 2023. RESULTS: We included a total of 30 high-quality articles and summarized 36 pieces of evidence from them. These pieces of evidence covered 11 dimensions of multidisciplinary management, aspiration risk assessment, tube location, nutritional infusion management, position management, airway management, and oral hygiene. The level of evidence in the study was predominantly level 1 and level 5, with 27 pieces of evidence recommended as 'strong' and 9 pieces of evidence recommended as 'weak'. CONCLUSION: This study summarizes 36 pieces of evidence on preventing and managing aspiration in critically ill patients with nasogastric feeding. But the characteristics of hospitals should be considered in the application of future evidence. IMPACT: Aspiration is the most serious complication during nasogastric feeding, which seriously affects the prognosis of patients. Preventing and managing aspiration in nasogastric patients has proven to be a challenging clinical problem. This study summarized 36 pieces of best evidence in 11 dimensions, including multidisciplinary team, assessment and identification, line position, feeding management, and so on. The implementation of these evidences is conducive to standardizing the operation behaviour of nasogastric feeding in clinical medical staff and reducing the occurrence of aspiration. REPORTING METHOD: This research followed the evidence summary reporting specifications of the Fudan University Center for Evidence-based Nursing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The registration number is 'ES20221368'.

Summary of the best evidence for nutritional support programs in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients undergoing radiotherapy.

Objective: To evaluate and summarize the best evidence for nutritional support in patients receiving radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma and to offer guidance for clinical practice. Background: Patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma undergoing radiotherapy often experience a high prevalence of malnutrition, and there is a lack of compiled guideline recommendations, which complicates the provision of a reference for clinical nursing. Methods: A systematic literature search revealed the best evidence of nutritional support for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients undergoing radiotherapy. Included in the review were various types of literature, such as clinical guidelines, expert consensus, systematic evaluations, meta-analyses, evidence summaries, and original studies. The evidence was graded according to the Australian Joanna Briggs Institute Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care Evidence Pre-Grading System (2016 version). Data were gathered from a range of sources, including BMJ Best Practice, the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAL, CNKI, the WanFang database, SinoMed, the Yi Maitong Guidelines Network, Dingxiangyuan, the Chinese Nutrition Society, the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism website, and the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition website. The search spanned from January 2013 to 2023. Results: A comprehensive review identified a total of 3,207 articles, comprising six guidelines, eight expert consensus articles, four systematic evaluations, five randomized controlled trials, two cohort trials, and two observational studies. From these articles, we synthesized 63 pieces of evidence spanning six domains: nutritional risk screening and assessment, nutrient requirements, nutritional support, management of nutritional symptoms, functional exercise, and nutritional monitoring and follow-up. Conclusion: A total of lines of evidence supporting nutritional support for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients receiving radiotherapy were summarized. However, the evidence should be combined with the actual clinical situation, and it should be validated in the future by combining large-sample and multicenter studies to provide a more scientific and beneficial nutritional support program for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients receiving radiotherapy.

Mediating Role of Evidence-Based Nursing Competence Between Specialist Nurses' Information Literacy and Innovative Behaviour: A Multicentre Cross-Sectional Study.

AIM: To investigate the levels of information literacy, evidence-based nursing competence and innovative behaviour in specialist nurses, determine the impact of information literacy and evidence-based nursing competence on the innovative behaviour of specialist nurses and to analyse the mediating role of evidence-based nursing competence between information literacy and innovative behaviour among specialist nurses. DESIGN: A multicenter cross-sectional design. METHODS: In March 2024, a survey was conducted on 313 specialist nurses in four tertiary Grade A comprehensive hospitals in China. Data collection involved the utilization of general demographic questionnaire, the Information Literacy Questionnaire, the Evidence-Based Nursing Competence Scale and the Nurse Innovation Behaviour Scale. The data were analysed using IBM SPSS26 and Amos28 software. RESULTS: Specialist nurses scored above average in information literacy, evidence-based nursing competence and innovative behaviour. Information literacy significantly positively correlated with innovative behaviour. Evidence-based nursing competence also positively affected innovative behaviour and partially mediated the relationship between information literacy and innovative behaviour. CONCLUSION: This research indicated that specialist nurses exhibited above-average levels of evidence-based nursing competence, information literacy and innovative behaviour. Both information literacy and evidence-based nursing competence positively impacted innovative behaviour, with evidence-based nursing competence playing a significant mediating role between information literacy and innovative behaviour. IMPACT: The findings suggest that nursing managers should focus on enhancing information literacy and evidence-based nursing competence in specialist nurses. Improving these abilities will support the implementation of innovative practices and advance the nursing field. REPORTING METHOD: The research findings were presented in strict accordance with the STROBE statement. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Not applicable. CONTRIBUTE TO THE WIDER GLOBAL CLINICAL COMMUNITY: It provides reference guidance and theoretical basis for global nursing managers to formulate targeted interventions, so as to effectively enhance the innovative behaviour of specialist nurses.

What is needed for nurses to work with evidence-based practice? A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Transformation of healthcare is necessary to ensure patients receive high-quality care. Working with the evidence-based practice (EBP) principles enables nurses to make this shift. Although working according to these principles is becoming more common, nurses base their actions too much on traditions and intuition. Therefore, to promote EBP in nursing practice and improve related education, more insight into nurses' needs is necessary to overcome existing EBP barriers. OBJECTIVE: To identify the current needs to work with EBP principles among hospital and community care nurses and student nurses. DESIGN: A qualitative, exploratory approach with focus group discussions. METHODS: Data was collected between February and December 2020 through 5 focus group discussions with 25 nurses and student nurses from a hospital, a community care organisation, and nursing education schools (bachelor and vocational). Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, and the main themes were synchronised to the seven domains from the Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases (TICD) checklist. RESULTS: Nurses and student nurses experience EBP as complex and require more EBP knowledge and reliable, ready-to-use evidence. They wanted to be facilitated in access to evidence, the opportunity to share insights with colleagues and more time to work on EBP. The fulfilment of these needs serves to enhance motivation to engage with evidence-based practice (EBP), facilitate personal development, and empower nurses and student nurses to take more leadership in working according to EBP principles and improve healthcare delivery. CONCLUSION: Nurses experience difficulties applying EBP principles and need support with their implementation. Nurses' and student nurses' needs include obtaining more EBP knowledge and access to tailored and ready-to-use information. They also indicated the need for role models, autonomy, incentives, dedicated time, and incorporation of EBP in daily work practice.

Best evidence summary of sleep protection in premature infants in the neonatal intensive care unit: a narrative review.

Background and Objective: Sleep influences the interaction between infants and their environment, as well as the achievement of crucial milestones in motor and language development. This is particularly significant for preterm infants in vulnerable positions. However, prematurely born infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are exposed to various stimuli such as noise and light, which disrupt their normal sleep patterns. This study assesses and consolidates the existing evidence on non-pharmacological strategies for protecting and promoting sleep in preterm infants. By providing an evidence-based data repository, it offers a valuable reference for clinical interventions. Methods: We conducted computer-based searches using various databases and resources, including UpToDate, BMJ Best Practice, Guidelines International Network (GIN), National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO), Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI), World Health Organization (WHO), Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, and China Biology Medicine disc (CBM). The search period spanned from January 2014 to May 2024. Key Content and Findings: We have included a total of 22 articles in our review, comprising two guidelines, 11 systematic reviews, 1 evidence summary, 1 technical report, 2 practice recommendations, and 5 randomized controlled trials. The evidence was synthesized from eight domains: sleep team construction, risk factor assessment, sleep assessment tools, positional management, noise control, light management, sensory stimulation, and hospital-home transition sleep management, resulting in 27 pieces of evidence. Conclusions: This study summarizes the optimal evidence for the management of sleep in premature infants, providing empirical support for standardizing the management of sleep in premature infants. It is recommended that healthcare professionals judiciously apply the best evidence while considering the clinical context, thus promoting safe sleep for premature infants.

Summary of best evidence for rehabilitation management of patients with motor dysfunction after stroke. / è„‘å’ä¸­è¿åŠ¨åŠŸèƒ½éšœç¢æ‚£è€ åº·å¤ç®¡ç†çš„æœ€ä½³è¯æ®æ€»ç»“.

OBJECTIVES: The rehabilitation work for patients with motor dysfunction after stroke is crucial. However, there is currently a lack of summarized evidence regarding the rehabilitation management of stroke patients in rehabilitation wards, communities, and at home. This study aims to compile relevant evidence on the rehabilitation management of patients with motor dysfunction after stroke, providing a reference for clinical and community health professionals to carry out rehabilitation interventions. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in BMJ Best Practice, UpToDate, National Guidebook Clearinghouse, American Heart Association/American Stroke Association, Canadian Medical Association, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, United States Department of Veterans Affairs/ Department of Defense, Registered Nurses Association of Ontario, JBI Evidence-Based Healthcare Center Database, The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, CNKI, Wanfang Database, SinoMed, and other databases for all literature on the rehabilitation management of patients with motor dysfunction after stroke. This included clinical decision-making, guidelines, expert consensuses, recommended practices, systematic reviews, and evidence summaries, with the search period spanning from the establishment of each database to October 2023. Two researchers independently evaluated the quality of the literature. RESULTS: A total of twenty-one documents were included, consisting of 11 guidelines, 2 expert consensus, and 8 systematic reviews. Evidence was extracted and integrated from the included literature, summarizing forty-five pieces of evidence across nine areas: rehabilitation management model, rehabilitation institutions, rehabilitation teams, timing of rehabilitation interventions, rehabilitation assessment, rehabilitation programs, rehabilitation duration and frequency, rehabilitation intensity, and rehabilitation support These covered comprehensive rehabilitation management content for stroke patients in the early, subacute, and chronic phases. CONCLUSIONS: The best evidence summarized in this study for the rehabilitation management of patients with motor dysfunction after stroke is comprehensive and of high quality. It provides important guidance for clinical and community healthcare professionals in carrying out rehabilitation interventions. When applying the evidence, it is recommended to consider the current condition of the stroke patient, the extent of motor dysfunction, environmental factors, and the patient's preferences. Then, select the most appropriate rehabilitation plan, and adjust the type and intensity of training according to each patient's specific needs and preferences.

Development of a nurse navigation program for cancer pain.

Objective: Cancer pain significantly impacts the overall quality of life of cancer patients, necessitating proactive management. The manifestations of cancer pain vary individually and require tailored interventions to address each patient's unique characteristics. Therefore, this study aims to develop a nurse navigation program for cancer pain (NNP-CP) tailored to the needs of cancer patients requiring pain control, aiming to establish evidence-based clinical nursing practices and promote effective cancer pain management. Methods: This study is a methodological research into developing a pain management program led by nurses for cancer patients requiring pain control, based on a professional navigation framework. The development of the program relied on three out of the five stages of the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation) model. Results: A literature review was conducted to select the content and rationale to be included in the intervention program. Publications within the last 10 years in English or Korean were identified and screened based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 literature selection flow, 17 articles were included. Standardized information regarding cancer pain control was based on the 7th edition of 'Cancer Pain Management Guidelines'. The initial draft of the pain management intervention program was developed by organizing and structuring the derived content based on the professional navigation framework. Subsequently, the final intervention program was confirmed through the review by six clinical experts specializing in cancer pain. Conclusions: Cancer pain is a significant factor that profoundly influences the quality of life and survival duration of cancer patients. While appropriate management methods offer the prospect of control, insufficient intervention is the current reality. Through the pain management intervention program based on the expert navigation framework that promotes continuity of care and empowers the recipients, this study anticipates not only pain reduction in cancer patients but also an enhancement in their quality of life.

First-line managers' experience of guideline implementation in orthopaedic nursing and rehabilitation: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: First-line managers have a unique role and potential in encouraging the use of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and thus serve the provision of safe patient care. In acute and planned hospital care, effective yet safeguarded nursing procedures are a necessity. Little is currently known about how first-line managers engage in supporting the adoption of evidence-based nursing care and about what barriers and enablers there are for implementation of CPGs in the orthopaedic care context. PURPOSE: To investigate first-line managers' experience of clinical practice guideline implementation in orthopaedic care. METHODS: This qualitative interview study included 30 first-line nursing and rehabilitation managers in 17 orthopaedic units in Sweden. A deductive content analysis, with the Ottawa Model of Implementation Leadership as a guide, was employed. RESULTS: To the first-line managers, any guideline implementation required them to balance contexts, including their outer context (signified by the upper-level management and decision-makers) and their inner context, including staff and patients in their unit(s). Acting in response to these contexts, the managers described navigating the organization and its terms and conditions; using relations-, change-, and task-oriented leadership, such as involving the staff; motivating the change by emphasizing the patient benefits; and procuring resources, such as time and training. Even though they knew from past experience what worked when implementing CPGs, the first-line managers often encountered barriers within the contexts that hampered successful implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Although first-line managers know how to effectively implement CPGs, an organization's terms and conditions can limit their opportunities to fully do so. Organizational awareness of what supports and hinders first-line managers to offer implementation leadership can enhance opportunities to alter behaviours and conditions for the benefit of CPG implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered as NCT04700969 with the U.S. National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry on 8 January 2021.

Summary of the Clinical Evidence for Non-Pharmacological Management of Postoperative Delirium in Adults: An Evidence Synthesis.

Objective: To retrieve, evaluate, and summarise the clinical evidence for non-pharmacological interventions in adult postoperative delirium (POD), encompassing the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases. Methods: The methods included conducting searches on UpToDate Clinical Consultants, the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, the Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario, BMJ Best Practice, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, VIP, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System. Clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision-making, evidence summaries, evidence synthesis, expert consensus, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses on non-pharmacological interventions for adult POD were examined, and the search period spanned between the establishment of each database and 30 October 2023. Results: A total of 17 documents were included, comprising three guidelines, one expert consensus, one clinical decision-making article, four evidence summaries, three systematic reviews, and five meta-analyses. These documents primarily focused on the following three aspects: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care. In total, 30 "best evidence" instances were compiled. Conclusion: Considering the complexity and potential harm of adult POD, an accurate and timely evaluation of high-risk factors, alongside effective medical nursing strategies, is vital in its prevention and treatment. Non-pharmacological interventions remain the preferred choice for preventing and treating POD. Medical institutions should establish standardised processes for non-pharmacological intervention in adult POD, based on evidence-based medicine, to enhance the level of clinical care in this field.

Construct validity and reliability of the BARRIERS scale in the Spanish context.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the construct validity of the Spanish version of the BARRIERS scale. METHOD: Methodological study of validation of a measurement instrument based on data from previously published studies. The study population consisted of nurses from the Basque Health Service and the Canary Health Service. The following variables were extracted and unified: Years of professional experience, possession of a specialist nursing degree, possession of a doctorate, type of activity performed by the professional and field of work. For construct validation, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed based on the initial model proposed for the scale and RASCH analysis. A polychoric correlation matrix, factor extraction by unweighted least squares and PROMIN oblique rotation were used. For the RASCH analysis, the Joint Maximun Likelihood estimation (JMLE) method was used; the fit of the items and persons were estimated by means of outfit - Unweighted Mean Square fit statistic (UMS) and infit -Weighted Mean Square Fit Statistic (WMS), as well as the reliability and separation of items and persons. RESULTS: A total of 1200 nurses and midwives made up the final validation sample (n = 1200), with a mean professional experience of 21.22 ± 9.26 years. The CFA presented a good fit to the data (KMO = 0.935 [95% CI: 0.921-0.945]), changing the factorial assignment in 6 items, while 5 items received factorial scores in more than one factor. The fit values for the 4-factor solution were RMSEA = 0.026 [95% CI: 0.026-0.027] and GFI = 0.991 [95% CI: 0.986-0.991]. In the RASCH analysis most items presented infit-WMS and outfit-UMS values with a good fit. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of the BARRIERS scale has adequate construct validity although there are changes in the assignment of items to the dimensions compared to the original model. The RASCH analysis indicates adequate fit for both persons and items.