Development of a rapid and fully automated factor VIII inhibitor assay, insensitive to emicizumab, and a lowest level of quantification of 0.2 BU/mL.

BACKGROUND: Factor (F)VIII inhibitors are measured using labor- and resource-expensive Nijmegen or Bethesda assays, which lack sensitivity for low-titer inhibitors and show high variations in quality surveys, mainly because of manual assay procedures. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was the development of a fast and fully automated FVIII inhibitor assay by using recombinant (r)FVIII as substrate and dedicated equipment for execution of the test. METHODS: A new rapid, fully automated, FVIII inhibitor assay is presented, the core of which is use of full-length recombinant FVIII (rFVIII; Kovaltry, Bayer) as inhibitor substrate instead of plasma FVIII, resulting in rapid binding of inhibitors to rFVIII due to absence of von Willebrand factor. Dramatic shortening of incubation time facilitated full automation on an analyzer capable of 3 subsequent sample dilution steps and 3 reagent additions. Equal volume mixtures of sample and rFVIII (1.0 U/mL) were incubated for 10 minutes at 37 °C, whereafter remaining FVIII activity was analyzed with a kinetic chromogenic assay, allowing inhibitor activity calculation without preceding FVIII activity calibration, using a Ceveron s100 analyzer (Technoclone). RESULTS: Mean titer in 60 nonhemophiliacs was 0.0 BU/mL (SD, 0.1), yielding a limit of blank of 0.1 BU/mL and lower limit of quantification of 0.2 BU/mL. Analyses were performed with the new method and a Nijmegen assay in 28 inhibitor-positive clinical samples, 14 containing emicizumab and 14 without. Correlation coefficient in emicizumab-free type I inhibitor samples was 1.0. Emicizumab dependency of the method was excluded in spiking experiments with inhibitor-positive samples. Reproducibility was tested by analyzing 7 samples in 3 laboratories for 5 days, twice daily; coefficients of variation of all samples were <15%. CONCLUSION: We present development data of a sensitive and specific rapid, automated FVIII inhibitor assay generating results within 20 minutes that is less resource-intensive than standard assays with potential to improve assay variability.

In Utero Cell Treatment of Hemophilia A Mice via Human Amniotic Fluid Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Engraftment.

Hemophilia is a genetic disorder linked to the sex chromosomes, resulting in impaired blood clotting due to insufficient intrinsic coagulation factors. There are approximately one million individuals worldwide with hemophilia, with hemophilia A being the most prevalent form. The current treatment for hemophilia A involves the administration of clotting factor VIII (FVIII) through regular and costly injections, which only provide temporary relief and pose inconveniences to patients. In utero transplantation (IUT) is an innovative method for addressing genetic disorders, taking advantage of the underdeveloped immune system of the fetus. This allows mesenchymal stromal cells to play a role in fetal development and potentially correct genetic abnormalities. The objective of this study was to assess the potential recovery of coagulation disorders in FVIII knockout hemophilia A mice through the administration of human amniotic fluid mesenchymal stromal cells (hAFMSCs) via IUT at the D14.5 fetal stage. The findings revealed that the transplanted human cells exhibited fusion with the recipient liver, with a ratio of approximately one human cell per 10,000 mouse cells and produced human FVIII protein in the livers of IUT-treated mice. Hemophilia A pups born to IUT recipients demonstrated substantial improvement in their coagulation issues from birth throughout the growth period of up to 12 weeks of age. Moreover, FVIII activity reached its peak at 6 weeks of age, while the levels of FVIII inhibitors remained relatively low during the 12-week testing period in mice with hemophilia. In conclusion, the results indicated that prenatal intrahepatic therapy using hAFMSCs has the potential to improve clotting issues in FVIII knockout mice, suggesting it as a potential clinical treatment for individuals with hemophilia A.

Simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®) in previously untreated patients with severe haemophilia A-Final efficacy and safety results from the NuProtect study.

INTRODUCTION: Simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®) is a 4th generation recombinant FVIII with proven efficacy for the prevention and treatment of bleeding episodes (BEs) in previously treated patients with severe haemophilia A. The NuProtect study assessed the immunogenicity, efficacy and safety of simoctocog alfa in 108 previously untreated patients (PUPs). The incidence of high-titre inhibitors was 16.2% and no patients with non-null F8 mutations developed inhibitors. AIM: To report the efficacy and safety results from the NuProtect study. METHODS: PUPs received simoctocog alfa for prophylaxis, treatment of BEs, or as surgical prophylaxis. The efficacy of prophylaxis (during inhibitor-free periods) was assessed using annualised bleeding rates (ABRs). The efficacy in treating BEs and in surgical prophylaxis was assessed using a 4-point scale. Adverse events were recorded throughout the study. RESULTS: Of 108 PUPs treated with simoctocog alfa, 103 received at least one prophylactic dose and 50 received continuous prophylaxis for at least 24 weeks. In patients on continuous prophylaxis, the median ABR was 0 (mean 0.5) for spontaneous BEs and 2.5 (mean 3.6) for all BEs. In 85 patients who had BEs, efficacy of BE treatment was excellent or good for 92.9% (747/804) of rated BEs; 92.3% of BEs were treated with 1 or 2 infusions. The efficacy of surgical prophylaxis was excellent or good for 94.7% (18/19) of rated procedures. There were no safety concerns and no thromboembolic events. CONCLUSION: Simoctocog alfa was efficacious and well tolerated as prophylaxis, surgical prophylaxis and for the treatment of BEs in PUPs with severe haemophilia A.

Managing Relevant Clinical Conditions of Hemophilia A/B Patients.

The Medical Directors of nine Italian Hemophilia Centers reviewed and discussed the key issues concerning the replacement therapy of hemophilia patients during a one-day consensus conference held in Rome one year ago. Particular attention was paid to the replacement therapy needed for surgery using continuous infusion (CI) versus bolus injection (BI) of standard and extended half-life Factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates in severe hemophilia A patients. Among the side effects, the risk of development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) and thromboembolic complications was addressed. The specific needs of mild hemophilia A patients were described, as well as the usage of bypassing agents to treat patients with high-responding inhibitors. Young hemophilia A patients may take significant advantages from primary prophylaxis three times or twice weekly, even with standard half-life (SHL) rFVIII concentrates. Patients affected by severe hemophilia B probably have a less severe clinical phenotype than severe hemophilia A patients, and in about 30% of cases may undergo weekly prophylaxis with an rFIX SHL concentrate. The prevalence of missense mutations in 55% of severe hemophilia B patients allows the synthesis of a partially changed FIX molecule that can play some hemostatic role at the level of endothelial cells or the subendothelial matrix. The flow back of infused rFIX from the extravascular to the plasma compartment allows a very long half-life of about 30 h in some hemophilia B patients. Once weekly, prophylaxis can assure a superior quality of life in a large severe or moderate hemophilia B population. According to the Italian registry of surgery, hemophilia B patients undergo joint replacement by arthroplasty less frequently than hemophilia A patients. Finally, the relationships between FVIII/IX genotypes and the pharmacokinetics of clotting factor concentrates have been investigated.

A review of the rationale for gene therapy for hemophilia A with inhibitors: one-shot tolerance and treatment?

The therapeutic landscape for people living with hemophilia A (PwHA) has changed dramatically in recent years, but many clinical challenges remain, including the development of inhibitory antibodies directed against factor VIII (FVIII) that occur in approximately 30% of people with severe hemophilia A. Emicizumab, an FVIII mimetic bispecific monoclonal antibody, provides safe and effective bleeding prophylaxis for many PwHA, but clinicians still explore therapeutic strategies that result in immunologic tolerance to FVIII to enable effective treatment with FVIII for problematic bleeding events. This immune tolerance induction (ITI) to FVIII is typically accomplished through repeated long-term exposure to FVIII using a variety of protocols. Meanwhile, gene therapy has recently emerged as a novel ITI option that provides an intrinsic, consistent source of FVIII. As gene therapy and other therapies now expand therapeutic options for PwHA, we review the persistent unmet medical needs with respect to FVIII inhibitors and effective ITI in PwHA, the immunology of FVIII tolerization, the latest research on tolerization strategies, and the role of liver-directed gene therapy to mediate FVIII ITI.

Safe and Successful Surgical Outcome in Persons with Hemophilia A with and without Inhibitors Treated with Emicizumab: A Large, Single Center, Real-World Experience.

Emicizumab is a humanized recombinant bispecific antibody, bridging together activated factor IX (FIXa) and factor X (FX), thus mimicking the activity of FVIII in vivo. Emicizumab is designed for long-term prophylaxis in patients with severe hemophilia A with and without inhibitors. This approach provides constant protection, with significant reduction in bleeding rate and improved quality of life. However, protection provided by emicizumab is not absolute, and clotting factor concentrates (FVIII, rFVIIa, aPCC) may be necessary for post-traumatic bleeding or surgery, with a potential thrombotic risk or difficulty in preventing bleeding. Real world evidence is still scanty, especially for managing major surgery. In this study, 75 surgeries were managed in 28 patients (27 major procedures in 15 patients and 48 minor procedures in 20 patients. In 17 patients without inhibitors, 30 minor surgeries were carried out by using FVIII in 5, with only a bleeding event, which was successfully treated with FVIII concentrate. Six major surgeries were uneventfully performed with FVIII concentrate. Eleven PWHA and high-titer inhibitors underwent 39 surgical procedures (18 minor and 21 major surgeries). Minor surgeries were mostly performed without prophylaxis with rFVIIa, with only a single bleeding complication. All 21 major surgeries were covered with a homogeneous protocol using rFVIIa. In four instances, bleeding complications occurred, treated with rFVIIa. Of them, a single patient only failed to respond and died because of an uncontrollable bleeding from a large ruptured retroperitoneal pseudotumor. Surgery in patients with emicizumab can be safely carried out with the use of appropriate replacement therapy protocols.

Modulating the microenvironment during FVIII uptake influences the nature of FVIII-peptides presented by antigen-presenting cells.

Background and aims: Hemophilia A is a severe bleeding disorder caused by the deficiency of functionally active coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). The induction of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies is a major complication in the treatment of hemophilia A patients with FVIII replacement therapies. Why some patients develop neutralizing antibodies (FVIII inhibitors) while others do not is not well understood. Previous studies indicated that the induction of FVIII inhibitors requires cognate interactions between FVIII-specific B cells and FVIII-specific CD4+ T cells in germinal center reactions. In this study, we investigated the FVIII peptide repertoire presented by antigen-presenting cells (APCs) under different microenvironment conditions that are expected to alter the uptake of FVIII by APCs. The aim of this study was to better understand the association between different microenvironment conditions during FVIII uptake and the FVIII peptide patterns presented by APCs. Methods: We used a FVIII-specific CD4+ T cell hybridoma library derived from humanized HLA-DRB1*1501 (human MHC class II) hemophilic mice that were treated with human FVIII. APCs obtained from the same mouse strain were preincubated with FVIII under different conditions which are expected to alter the uptake of FVIII by APCs. Subsequently, these preincubated APCs were used to stimulate the FVIII-specific CD4+ T cell hybridoma library. Stimulation of peptide-specific CD4+ T-cell hybridoma clones was assessed by analyzing the IL-2 release into cell culture supernatants. Results: The results of this study indicate that the specific microenvironment conditions during FVIII uptake by APCs determine the peptide specificities of subsequently activated FVIII-specific CD4+ T cell hybridoma clones. Incubation of APCs with FVIII complexed with von Willebrand Factor, FVIII activated by thrombin or FVIII combined with a blockade of receptors on APCs previously associated with FVIII uptake and clearance, resulted in distinct peptide repertoires of subsequently activated hybridoma clones. Conclusion: Based on our data we conclude that the specific microenvironment during FVIII uptake by APCs determines the FVIII peptide repertoire presented on MHC class II expressed by APCs and the peptide specificity of subsequently activated FVIII-specific CD4+ T cell hybridoma clones.

Plasma-derived FVIII/VWF complex shows higher protection against inhibitors than isolated FVIII after infusion in haemophilic patients: A translational study.

INTRODUCTION: Presence of von Willebrand factor (VWF) in FVIII concentrates offers protection against neutralizing inhibitors in haemophilia A (HA). Whether this protection is more evident in plasma-derived (pd) FVIII/VWF or recombinant (r) FVIII concentrates remains controversial. AIM: We investigated the protection exerted by VWF against FVIII inhibitors in an in vivo mouse model of HA exposed to pdFVIII/VWF or to various rFVIII concentrates. METHODS: Haemophilia A mice received the different FVIII concentrates after administration of vehicle or an inhibitory IgG purified from a commercial pool of HA plasma with inhibitors and FVIII:C recoveries were measured. Furthermore, using a novel clinically oriented ex vivo approach, Bethesda inhibitory activities (BU) of a commercial pool of HA plasma with inhibitors were assessed using normal plasma, or plasma from severe HA patients, without inhibitors, after treatment with the same concentrates. RESULTS: in vivo studies showed that pdFVIII/VWF offers markedly higher protection against inhibitors when compared with any of the FVIII products without VWF. More importantly, in the ex vivo studies, plasma from patients treated with pdFVIII/VWF showed higher protection against inhibitors (P values ranging .05-.001) in comparison with that observed in plasma from patients who received FVIII products without VWF, regardless of the type of product evaluated. CONCLUSION: Data indicate that FVIII+VWF complexes assembled in the circulation after rFVIII infusion are not equivalent to the naturally formed complex in pdFVIII/VWF. Therefore, rFVIII infused into HA patients with inhibitors would be less protected by VWF than the FVIII in pdFVIII/VWF concentrates.

Immune Tolerance Induction (ITI) with a pdFVIII/VWF Concentrate (octanate) in 100 Patients in the Observational ITI (ObsITI) Study.

Background Immune tolerance induction (ITI) with repeated factor VIII (FVIII) administration is the only strategy proven to eradicate inhibitors. The observational ITI study is evaluating ITI with a range of FVIII products. Methods This subgroup analysis reports prospective interim data for patients treated with a plasma-derived, von Willebrand factor-stabilized FVIII concentrate (pdFVIII/VWF, octanate). Complete success (CS) of ITI required achievement of three criteria: inhibitor titer < 0.6 BU/mL; FVIII recovery ≥ 66%; FVIII half-life ≥6 hours. Partial success (PS) required achievement of two criteria and partial response (PR) one. ITI success was defined as CS or PS. Data were analyzed for patients who achieved CS, had 36 months' observation, or failed ITI. Results One-hundred prospectively enrolled patients were included in the analysis; 91 had poor prognosis factors for ITI success. The mean (standard deviation) daily ITI dose was 116.4 (61.1) IU FVIII/kg in 14 low responders (< 5 BU/mL) and 173.7 (112.0) IU FVIII/kg in 86 high responders (≥ 5 BU/mL). Inhibitor titers < 0.6 BU/mL were achieved in 71% of patients in a median of 4.01 months, accompanied by a 93% reduction in bleeding rate. ITI success was achieved by 70% of patients and 56 of 72 (78%) primary (first-line) ITI patients. PR was achieved by 5 patients; ITI failed in 25 patients. PS and CS were achieved in a median of 5.55 and 11.25 months, respectively. Conclusions ITI with pdFVIII/VWF led to rapid eradication of FVIII inhibitors, normalization of FVIII pharmacokinetics in the majority of patients, and a significant reduction in bleeding rates.

BAFF rs9514828 gene polymorphism and the risk of the development of inhibitors in children with severe haemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: Haemophilia A (HA) is an x-linked recessive disease due to deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). The development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) against infused FVIII is a major concern. B cell activating factor (BAFF) has been implicated in several autoimmune diseases. AIM: We aimed to evaluate the possible association of BAFF rs9514828 gene polymorphism and the risk of the development of FVIII inhibitor in children with severe HA. METHODS: This cohort study was carried out on 100 newly diagnosed boys with severe HA who were never treated before with FVIII concentrate. Assessment of serum levels of BAFF and BAFF rs9514828 genotyping at first diagnosis was performed and the patients were followed up for the completion of a total of 50 exposure days or the development of inhibitors whichever occurred first. The patients were divided as positive or negative according to the presence or absence of inhibitors. RESULTS: The risk allele for BAFF rs9514828 (T) was significantly more frequent in the inhibitor positive patients than the inhibitor negative patients (P = .003). In addition, CT+TT genotypes were associated with increased risk of FVIII inhibitor development. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis showed that BAFF levels could predict the development of FVIII inhibitors at a cut-off value of ≥ .92 with a sensitivity of 85.9% and a specificity of 80.2%. CONCLUSION: BAFF rs9514828 gene polymorphism could be independent risk factor and elevated BAFF levels might be useful prognostic marker for the development of FVIII inhibitor in newly diagnosed children with severe HA.

Concomitant use of bypassing agents with emicizumab for people with haemophilia A and inhibitors undergoing surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Surgery in people with haemophilia and factor VIII inhibitors is typically managed with perioperative administration of haemostatic agents to prevent or control the occurrence of bleeding events. Practical experience of surgery in patients with inhibitors who are receiving treatment with emicizumab is growing; however, the novelty of the situation means that standardised guidelines are lacking with regard to the concomitant administration of haemostatic agents, including dose and laboratory monitoring. AIM: To review approaches to haemostatic management during major and minor invasive procedures in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors, and to provide recommendations for controlling bleeding events. METHODS: A search was conducted, limited to the past 4 years (January 2016-April 2020), pertaining to published evidence of surgery for patients receiving emicizumab. Publications identified from the search were manually reviewed to determine studies and case reports relevant for inclusion. RESULTS: Identified literature and practical experience of the authors were used to build a consensus of practical recommendations for the concomitant administration of haemostatic agents during the perioperative period for elective surgery in patients with inhibitors who are receiving emicizumab. CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence base indicates that surgery can be successfully performed in patients with inhibitors who are receiving emicizumab and that bypassing agents can be used concomitantly. Data from prospective studies are required to further support recommendations for haemostatic management of surgery in patients receiving emicizumab.

FVIII inhibitors display FV-neutralizing activity in the prothrombin time assay.

BACKGROUND: The coagulation factors (F)V and VIII are homologous proteins that support hemostasis through their regulation of FX activity. Hemophilia A (HA) patients have reduced FVIII activity and a prolonged bleeding time that is corrected through the administration of exogenous FVIII. Around one-third of severe HA patients develop FVIII neutralizing antibodies, known as "inhibitors," which neutralize FVIII activity and preclude them from further FVIII therapy. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that, based on the degree of homology between FV and FVIII (~40%), FVIII-neutralizing antibodies could cross react with FV. To test this hypothesis, a panel of recombinant, patient-derived, FVIII-neutralizing antibodies were screened for cross-reactivity against FV. METHODS: Factor V and FVIII activity was measured using one-stage clotting assays; structural analysis was carried out using a structural approach. RESULTS: We detected FV neutralizing activity with the anti-FVIII A2 domain antibody NB11B2. Because this antibody was derived from an HA inhibitor patient, FV-neutralizing activity was then evaluated in a number of HA inhibitor patient plasma samples; nine alloimmune samples had FV-neutralizing activity whereas no FV neutralizing activity was found in the two autoimmune samples available. We next examined the degree of surface homology between FV and FVIII and found that structural similarity could explain the cross reactivity of the anti-A2 antibody and likely accounts for the cross reactivity we observed in patient samples. CONCLUSIONS: Although this novel observation is of interest, further work will be needed to determine whether FV neutralization in HA patient samples contributes to their bleeding diathesis.

Inhibitors-Recent insights.

The development of inhibitory antibodies to therapeutic factor VIII (FVIII) in haemophilia A (HA) patients is the major complication in treatment/prevention of haemorrhages. The reasons some HA patients develop inhibitors while others do not remain unclear. This review briefly summarizes our understanding of anti-FVIII immune responses, the roles of T cells, both effector and regulatory, and generally discusses the interplay between FVIII and the immune system, both in factor replacement therapy and gene therapy, with some comparisons to factor IX and haemophilia B therapies. Notably, we propose that the prevailing observed active tolerance to FVIII in both HA and non-HA individuals rests to greater or lesser extents on peripherally induced immune tolerance. We also propose that the immune systems of inhibitor-negative HA patients do not merely ignore therapeutic FVIII, but rather have immunologically assessed and actively tolerized the patients to exogenous FVIII. Induction of such peripheral immune tolerance may further be triggered in HA patients who failed to tolerize upon initial FVIII exposure by 'appropriate' stimulation of their immune system, eg by immune tolerance induction therapy via intensive FVIII therapy, by oral administration of FVIII, by cellular therapies or by gene therapy directed to immuno-tolerogenic sites such as the liver.

Prevalence of FVIII Inhibitors Among Children with Hemophilia A: Experience at the Jordanian Royal Medical Services.

INTRODUCTION: Replacement therapy is constantly required by Hemophilia A (HA) patients lacking coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). The most serious complication of this treatment is the development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors). AIM: The aim of this study is to determine the frequency of FVIII inhibitors among children treated for HA at the Jordanian Royal Medical Services. METHODS: A total of 165 diagnosed HA patients receiving on-demand treatment, were tested for FVIII inhibitors between 2003 and 2018. The age range was 6 months to 16 years. Coagulation and inhibitor screening assays were performed, followed by Bethesda assay for inhibitor-positive samples to quantify FVIII inhibitor titers. RESULTS: Out of the 165 patients, 111 had severe hemophilia with FVIII level < 1%, 26 had moderate hemophilia with FVIII levels of 1-5% and 28 had mild hemophilia with FVIII levels of > 5%. Twenty patients had FVIII inhibitors, of whom 18 had high titers, 2 had low titers. The mean inhibitor level in low (titer) responders was 2.40 ± 0.85 BU, as opposed to 116.25 ±169.25 BU in high (titer) responders. In terms of disease severity, 18 of the 20 patients with FVIII inhibitors had severe HA, whereas two had moderate HA. No inhibitors were encountered in the mild HA group. CONCLUSION: Inhibitors only developed in moderate and severe cases of HA. The severity of the disease and age were the main contributing factors. The association between family history of inhibitors and the incidence of inhibitor formation warrants genetic evaluations to look for relevant mutations.

Concomitant Use of rFVIIa and Emicizumab in People with Hemophilia A with Inhibitors: Current Perspectives and Emerging Clinical Evidence.

Emicizumab, a humanized, bi-specific, monoclonal antibody subcutaneously administered, mimicking the function of FVIIIa, represents a milestone in treatment of patients affected by hemophilia A complicated with inhibitors. The HAVEN 1 and 2 studies have clearly established its superiority compared to bypassing agents for routine prophylaxis in preventing or reducing bleeding episodes in adult and pediatric patients with inhibitors. However, its protection against bleeding is only partial, and concomitant use of a bypassing agent may be required with potential prothrombotic risk. The emicizumab Phase III trials (HAVEN 1, 2 and 4) have shown that the traditional bypassing agents, activated prothrombin complex concentrates or recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa), may be necessary for the treatment of breakthrough bleeds or surgery management. A post hoc analysis in particular has shown that the concomitant use of emicizumab and rFVIIa is safe and no thrombotic events have been described. The review describes the state of the art of the concomitant use of emicizumab and rFVIIa for treating acute bleeding and surgeries, its efficacy and safety and the lack of thrombotic events associated with this treatment modality. Data still derive mainly from HAVEN trials; however, the availability of emicizumab in clinical practice is progressively increasing the number of patients treated and no adverse events directly attributed to this agent have occurred. The availability of guidelines for the use and dosing of rFVIIa during emicizumab prophylaxis is useful in clinical practice for managing suspected or ongoing bleeding, emergency situations and elective invasive procedures. In the next years, careful prospective post-licensure surveillance to monitor safety of rFVIIa use during prophylaxis with emicizumab is highly recommended.

Short term efficacy of recombinant porcine factor VIII in patients with factor VIII inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Antibodies against factor VIII (FVIII), seen in acquired (AHA) and congenital haemophilia A, lead to severe bleeding diatheses. Current first-line treatment includes bypass agents. Recombinant porcine sequence FVIII (rpFVIII) was developed as an alternative therapy. AIM: To describe our institutional experience with the use of rpFVIII. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of five patients treated with rpVIII between 2016 and 2019. RESULTS: Five patients (four AHA, one congenital haemophilia with inhibitors) were treated with rpFVIII. No patient had an adverse event during infusion. All patients initially exhibited a response evidenced by increased FVIII levels from baseline <1% to 81%-170%, normalization of the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and resolution of bleeding. However, all five patients were subsequently noted to have decreasing peak FVIII levels and aPTT prolongation, either within the initial treatment course or upon later re-administration. Resistance to rpFVIII was recognized after an average of 12.4 exposure days. Porcine FVIII inhibitor levels measured afterwards were present (detectable-170 Bethesda units) in all patients. Three out of four AHA subjects also developed an increase in the anti-human FVIII inhibitor titres after receiving rpFVIII. CONCLUSION: rpFVIII was safe and initially effective in all patients. However, its use is associated with development of an inhibitor to rpFVIII, decreasing its efficacy and duration of effect. Further, rpFVIII use may lead to an increase in patient anti-human FVIII inhibitor titres. A larger study is necessary to appropriately assess the incidence of these outcomes.

Removal of Mannose-Ending Glycan at Asn2118 Abrogates FVIII Presentation by Human Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells.

The development of an immune response against therapeutic factor VIII is the major complication in hemophilia A patients. Oligomannose carbohydrates at N239 and/or N2118 on factor VIII allow its binding to the macrophage mannose receptor expressed on human dendritic cells, thereby leading to factor VIII endocytosis and presentation to CD4+ T lymphocytes. Here, we investigated whether altering the interaction of factor VIII with mannose-sensitive receptors on antigen-presenting cells may be a strategy to reduce factor VIII immunogenicity. Gene transfer experiments in factor VIII-deficient mice indicated that N239Q and/or N2118Q factor VIII mutants have similar specific activities as compared to non-mutated factor VIII; N239Q/N2118Q mutant corrected blood loss upon tail clip. Production of the corresponding recombinant FVIII mutants or light chains indicated that removal of the N-linked glycosylation site at N2118 is sufficient to abrogate in vitro the activation of FVIII-specific CD4+ T cells by human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. However, removal of mannose-ending glycans at N2118 did not alter factor VIII endocytosis and presentation to CD4+ T cells by mouse antigen-presenting cells. In agreement with this, the N2118Q mutation did not reduce factor VIII immunogenicity in factor VIII-deficient mice. Our results highlight differences in the endocytic pathways between human and mouse dendritic cell subsets, and dissimilarities in tissue distribution and function of endocytic receptors such as CD206 in both species. Further investigations in preclinical models of hemophilia A closer to humans are needed to decipher the exact role of mannose-ending glycans in factor VIII immunogenicity.

Management of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors.

Acquired hemophilia is a rare but severe condition, which is unknown to medical specialties outside hematology. Sudden appearance of antibodies against coagulation FVIII is diagnosed by abnormal subcutaneous large and multiple hematomas with minor injuries only. APTT is prolonged, FVIII activity variably low and inhibitor titer varies, too. The antibodies are typically occurring in women after delivery and later in life at around 60 years of life due to immunological challenges, and in association with malignant diseases. Rapid recognition of the condition and support of hemostasis together with immunosuppressive therapy is important, since the diagnostic delay is a poor prognostic sign. Coagulation experts should be consulted to arrange the management and followup of the patients. Management of bleeds consists of so-called FVIII bypassing agents, activated prothrombin complex concentrate, aPCC, recombinant FVIIa or porcine FVIII. The immunotherapy should be continued for several weeks according to the timing of the remission. The relapse rate needs to be noted in the future under similar situations as the index event occurred. Register data collection is important to characterize this lifethreatening acquired bleeding disorder.

Molecular Aggregation of Marketed Recombinant FVIII Products: Biochemical Evidence and Functional Effects.

Background Recombinant (rec-) coagulation factor VIII concentrates available for hemophilia A (HA) treatment differ in cell line production and structure, which could affect their pharmacodynamics and immunogenicity. Clinical trials showed that previously untreated patients with severe HA present higher rates of inhibitor development if treated with rec-FVIII products and that differences do exist as to inhibitor's formation among different rec-FVIII products. This finding could arise from several causes, such as absence of von Willebrand factor, different glycosylation profiles, or processes of molecular aggregation of the recombinant FVIII molecules. Objectives/Methods In this study, using size exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography (SE-HPLC), dynamic light scattering (DLS) spectroscopy, and functional biochemical assays, we investigated the purity grade, FX activating ability, and aggregation status of three recombinant marketed products (Advate [Baxalta], Refacto AF [Pfizer], and Kogenate [Bayer]). Results The overall analysis of the results obtained with SE-HPLC and DLS spectroscopy showed that the three recombinant FVIII concentrates contain low but significant amounts of molecular aggregates. This phenomenon was less evident for the Advate product. Molecular aggregation negatively affects the in vitro pharmacodynamics of the concentrates with higher aggregates' content. Conclusions This study shows that the three pharmaceutical formulations of recombinant FVIII contain variable amounts of molecular aggregates after their reconstitution at therapeutic concentrations. This phenomenon negatively affects the in vitro potency of the products with higher aggregates' content and might be invoked as a contributing cause of their increased risk to induce the formation of FVIII inhibitors.

Treatment regimens and outcomes in severe and moderate haemophilia A in the UK: The THUNDER study.

INTRODUCTION: The THUNDER study provides an analysis of treatment patterns and outcomes in UK patients with severe or moderate haemophilia A (SHA/MHA) in 2015. METHODS: Patients with SHA or MHA registered with the UK National Haemophilia Database (NHD) were segregated by severity, inhibitor status and age. Haemophilia joint health score (HJHS) was derived from NHD records and treatment regimen and annualized bleed/joint-bleed rate (ABR/AJBR) from Haemtrack (HT) in HT-compliant patients. RESULTS: We report 1810 patients with SHA and 864 with MHA. Prophylaxis was used in 94.9% (n = 130/137) of HT-compliant children <12 years with SHA, falling to 74.1% (n = 123/166) aged ≥40 years. Median ABR increased with age (1.0, IQR 0.0-5.0, <12 years; 3.0 IQR, 1.0-8.0, ≥40 years). Inhibitors were present in 159 (8.8%) SHA and 34 (3.9%) MHA. Median ABR increased from 2.0 (<12 years) to 21.0 (≥40 years) in SHA inhibitor patients using prophylaxis. Prophylaxis was used by 68.8% of HT-compliant MHA patients (n = 106) (median FVIII baseline 0.01 IU/mL) associated with a median (IQR) ABR of 3.0 (1.0-7.0). Median HJHS (n = 453) increased with age in SHA and MHA. Median (IQR) HJHS was higher in SHA inhibitor (17.0, 0.0-64.5) than non- or past inhibitor patients (7.0, 0.0-23.0). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing ABR with age persists despite current prophylaxis regimens. SHA and MHA had similar ABR/AJBR and HJHS, leading to a suspicion that a subgroup of MHA may be relatively undertreated. More intensive prophylaxis may improve outcomes, but this requires further study.