RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) defines continuing professional development (CPD) as a self-directed, ongoing, systematic, and outcomes-focused approach to lifelong learning that is applied into practice. Hospitals and health systems can use the ACPE CPD framework for performance evaluation and to support staff in developing learning goals. METHODS: This was an exploratory study using cross-sectional surveys and pharmacist self-reported CPD data at a community health system in the Southeastern USA. Surveys evaluating perceived value and use of CPD were administered to pharmacists with descriptive statistics calculated for quantitative survey responses qualitative data from open-ended responses analyzed using content analysis. CPD goals within pharmacist CPD records were reviewed and categorized based on relevance to the pharmacist's current practice setting. Survey results and CPD data were compared using an integrative narrative discussion. RESULTS: Overall, fifty-seven (33.1%) pharmacists and twelve (85.7%) pharmacy managers and directors responded to surveys. A total of 13 (22.8%) respondents strongly agreed and 21 (36.8%) respondents agreed that using CPD goals to advance their practice increased job enjoyment and 13 (22.8%) respondents strongly agreed and 30 (52.6%) respondents agreed that achievement of CPD goals resulted in improved patient care. A total of 3 (23.1%) managers or directors strongly agreed and 6 (46.2%) agreed that pharmacists are more engaged employees when they use a CPD framework to plan and achieve goals. Additionally, 3 (23.1%) strongly agreed and 7 (53.8%) agreed that using a CPD process for staff development contributed to retention. A total of 1353 CPD goals were documented by 148 pharmacists with 86.3% of goals rated as relevant to practice and 204 (15.1%) containing all specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) goal components. CONCLUSIONS: The CPD framework may be a useful approach to support pharmacist development in hospital and health system settings and facilitate performance reviews.
RESUMEN
Objectives: The purpose was to investigate effects of an in-service training for secondary special education teachers in Turkey. The study was to serve as an initial analysis of the basic knowledge of educators about transition mandates, transition planning and components of quality goals. Methods: Twenty-two teachers of students with DD completed the in-service training. TSTA model was used to structure the training. To assess differences between teachers' knowledge from pre-test to the post-test, paired sample t-tests were employed. Results: A significant increase in knowledge of general transition and goal functionality was observed from pre-test to post-test. Results indicated that the training was effective in both increasing teachers' knowledge and generalization of functional goal writing across content areas. Conclusions: The study revealed the dearth of research related to transition knowledge and generation of high quality transition goals for students with DD.
RESUMEN
AIMS: The aims of this study were to (1) describe the practices that school-based physical therapists use in developing student goals, and (2) identify facilitators and barriers to development of goals that are specific to participation in the context of the school setting. METHODS: 46 school-based physical therapists who participated in a previous study on school-based physical therapy practice (PT COUNTS) completed a questionnaire on goal development. Frequencies and cross tabulations were generated for quantitative data. Open-ended questions were analyzed using an iterative qualitative analysis process. RESULTS: A majority of therapists reported that they frequently develop goals collaboratively with other educational team members. Input from teachers, related services personnel, and parents has the most influence on goal development. Qualitative analysis identified five themes that influence development of participation-based goals: (1) school-based philosophy and practice; (2) the educational environment, settings, and routines; (3) student strengths, needs, and personal characteristics; (4) support from and collaboration with members of the educational team; and (5) therapist practice and motivation. CONCLUSION: Goal development is a complex process that involves multiple members of the educational team and is influenced by many different aspects of practice, the school environment, and student characteristics.