Reproductive outcome after in vitro fertilization in endometriosis - key factors and implications.

Endometriosis is a benign chronic disease with a major impact on a woman's quality of life, mainly due to painful physical symptoms. Endometriosis is also a common cause of infertility caused by low ovarian reserve, distorted pelvic anatomy, and severe local inflammation with a direct negative impact on the quality of oocytes, embryos, and endometrium. We conducted a retrospective study between January 2019 and December 2023, including women with a history of surgery for endometriosis who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF) to achieve pregnancy. Their reproductive outcome was compared with a group of patients with documented tubal obstruction. The aim of our study was to identify the factors associated with a positive impact on the pregnancy rate, specifically age, anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH), ovarian stimulation protocol, and types of gonadotropins used. We analyzed a group of 175 patients with endometriosis compared with 189 patients with tubal obstruction. The average age was similar between the two groups but with a difference in the average AMH value (1.63 ± 1.09 ng/mL vs. 2.55 ± 1.67 ng/mL). The most utilized ovarian stimulation protocol in both groups was the short gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist. The clinical pregnancy rate was 27.2% in the endometriosis group and 54.7% in the tubal obstruction group. Our study revealed that treatment with corifollitropin alfa in the endometriosis group was associated with a higher clinical pregnancy rate. AMH and age proved to be significant independent factors for the reproductive outcome.

Computational drug repurposing effort for identifying novel hits for the treatment of diseases such as endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and prostate cancer.

This research aimed to identify potential drug compounds from the ZINC15 molecule database that could effectively treat GnRH1R-related diseases. The study utilized molecular docking and molecular dynamics methods to achieve this goal, which is crucial in drug repurposing research. The virtual screening process involved analyzing known drug compounds using molecular docking. Additionally, molecular dynamics simulations and MM-GBSA were employed to evaluate the stability of the complexes and determine the interactions between the compounds and protein structure. As a result, this study provides significant insights for treating diseases such as endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and prostate cancer related to GnRH1R. The study also involved designing new drugs and identifying necessary molecular scaffolds.

Genome sequencing projects reveal new insights into the mammalian Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone II system.

The type II gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH-II) was first discovered in chicken (Gallus gallus) brain and then shown to be present in many vertebrates. Indeed, its structure is conserved unchanged throughout vertebrate evolution from teleost fish through to mammals suggesting a crucial function. Yet the functional significance has been largely unexplored. Studies in comparative endocrinology show that the GnRH-II system is differentially functional in mammalian species. Intact GnRH-II neuropeptide and receptor genes (GnRH2 and GnRH receptor 2 GnRHR2) occur in marmoset monkeys (Callithrix jacchus), musk shrews (Suncus murinus) and pigs (Sus scrofa). However, one or other or both of these genes are inactivated in other species, where mutations or remnants affecting GnRH2 neuropeptide and/or type II GnRHR exons are retained in conserved genomic loci. New data from DNA sequencing projects facilitate extensive analysis of species-specific variation in these genes. Here, we describe GnRH2 and GnRHR2 genes spanning a collection of 21 taxonomic orders, encompassing around 140 species from Primates, Scandentia, Eulipotyphla, Rodentia, Lagomorpha, Artiodactyla, Carnivora, Perissodactyls, Pholidota, Chiroptera, Afrotheria, Xenarthra and Marsupialia. Intact coding exons for both GnRH2 and GnRHR2 occur in monkeys, tree shrews, shrews, moles, hedgehogs, several rodents (degu, kangaroo-rat, pocket mouse), pig, pecarry and warthog, camels and alpaca, bears, Weddell seal, hyena, elephant, aardvark and marsupials. Inactivating mutations affecting GnRH2 and GnRHR2, some located at conserved sites within exons, occur in species of primates, most rodents, lagomorphs, bovidae, cetaceans, felidae, canidae and other carnivora, pangolins, most bats, armadillo, brushtail and echidna. A functional GnRH-II system appears retained within several taxonomic families of mammals, but intact retention does not extend to whole taxonomic orders. Defining how endogenous GnRH-II neuropeptide operates in different mammals may afford functional insight into its actions in the brain, especially as, unlike the type I GnRH system, it is expressed in the mid brain and not the hypothalamus.

Pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone therapy induces spermatogenesis in pituitary stalk interruption syndrome: A case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Pituitary stalk interruption syndrome (PSIS) is a rare anatomical defect of the pituitary gland falling under the spectrum of holoprosencephaly phenotypes. It is characterized by a deficiency in anterior pituitary hormones, such as growth hormone, gonadotropins, and thyroid hormones. Due to the syndrome's rarity and nonspecific manifestations, there is a lack of standardized treatment strategies. Consequently, early diagnosis through imaging and on-time intervention are crucial for improving patients' outcomes. CASE SUMMARY: A 30-year-old man presented with absent secondary sexual characteristics and azoospermia. Laboratory evaluation revealed a deficiency in gonadotropins, while thyroid function was mostly within normal ranges. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pituitary gland showed pituitary stalk agenesis, hypoplasia of the anterior pituitary, and ectopic posterior pituitary, leading to the diagnosis of PSIS. Initially, the patient underwent 6 mo of gonadotropin therapy without significant changes in hormone levels and secondary sexual characteristics. Pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone therapy was then administered, resulting in the detection of sperm in the semen analysis within 3 mo. After 6 mo, routine semen tests showed normal semen quality. The couple faced challenges in conceiving due to abstinence and underwent three cycles of artificial insemination, which was unsuccessful. They also attempted in vitro fertilization, but unfortunately, the woman experienced a miscarriage 10 wk after the embryo transfer. CONCLUSION: Early detection, accurate diagnosis, and timely treatment are crucial in improving the quality of life and fertility of PSIS patients.

Effect of body mass index on progesterone level on trigger day in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of body mass index (BMI) on progesterone (P) level on trigger day in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) cycles. METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort study. From October 2017 to April 2022, 412 in-vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) patients who were treated with GnRH-ant protocol for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in the reproductive center of our hospital were selected as the research objects. Patients were divided into three groups according to BMI level: normal weight group (n = 230):18.5 kg/m2≤BMI < 24 kg/m2; overweight group (n = 122): 24 kg/m2≤BMI < 28 kg/m2; Obesity group (n = 60): BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2. Variables with p < .10 in univariate analysis (BMI, basal FSH, basal P, FSH days, Gn starting dose and E2 level on trigger day) and variables that may affect P level on trigger day (infertility factors, basal LH, total FSH, HMG days and total HMG) were included in the multivariate logistic regression model to analyze the effect of BMI on P level on trigger day of GnRH-ant protocol. RESULTS: After adjustment for confounding factors, compared with that in normal weight patients, the risk of serum P elevation on trigger day was significantly lower in overweight and obese patients (OR = 0.434 and 0.199, respectively, p < .05). CONCLUSION: The risk of P elevation on trigger day in GnRH-ant cycles decreased with the increase of BMI, and BMI could be used as one of the predictors of P level on trigger day in GnRH-ant cycles.

[Comparative Study of the Embryo Development and Clinical Outcomes of 3 Ovarian Stimulation Protocols in Different Age Groups]. / 不同年龄段人群三种促排卵方案胚胎发育及临床结局比较.

Objective: The main purpose of this study is to compare the embryo development and clinical outcomes of women in different age groups undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) processes using gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol, GnRH agonist long protocol, and early follicular phase protocol. We aim to provide reliable reference for future clinical treatments. Methods: We conducted a detailed analysis of patients who underwent treatment between January 2021 and February 2023. 1) In the overall patient population, we comprehensively compared the basic characteristics, the embryo development, and the clinical outcomes of patients treated with three different ovarian stimulation protocols, including the GnRH antagonist protocol group (n=4173), the agonist long protocol group (n=2410), and the early follicular phase long protocol group (n=341). 2) We divided the overall population into three age groups, one group for patients under 30 years old (n=2576), one for patients aged 30-35 (n=3249), and one for patients older than 35 years old (n=1099). Then, we compared the three stimulation protocols based on the group division. We separately compared the embryo development and clinical outcomes of patients using the three stimulation protocols in the under 30 years old, the 30-35 years old, and the over 35 years old age groups. With this analysis, we aimed to explore the response of different age groups to different stimulation protocols and their impact on the success rate of IVF. Results: 1) In the overall population, we found that the average number of oocytes retrieved in the GnRH agonist long protocol group was significantly higher than that in the GnRH antagonist protocol group ([13.85±7.162] vs. [13.36±7.862], P=0.0224), as well as the early follicular phase long protocol group ([13.85±7.162] vs. [11.86±6.802], P<0.0001). Patients in the GnRH antagonist protocol group not only had a significantly lower starting dose of gonadotrophin (Gn) compared to the other two groups (P<0.05) but also had a significantly lower number of days of Gn use (P<0.05). The blastocyst formation rate in the GnRH antagonist protocol group was the highest among the three groups, significantly higher compared to the GnRH agonist long protocol group (64.91% vs. 62.35%, P<0.0001) and the early follicular phase long protocol group (64.91% vs. 61.18%, P=0.0001). However, there were no significant differences in the clinical pregnancy rates or the live birth rates among the three groups treated with different ovarian stimulation protocols (P>0.05). 2) In the <30 age group, the blastocyst formation rate in the GnRH antagonist protocol group was the highest among the three groups, significantly higher compared to the GnRH agonist long protocol group (66.12% vs. 63.33%, P<0.0001) and the early follicular phase long protocol group (66.12% vs. 62.13%, P=0.0094). In the 30-35 age group, the blastocyst formation rate in the GnRH antagonist protocol group was the highest among the three groups, significantly higher compared to the GnRH agonist long protocol group (64.88% vs. 62.93%, P=0.000 9) and the early follicular phase long protocol group (64.88% vs. 60.39%, P=0.0011). In the >35 age group, the blastocyst formation rate in the GnRH antagonist protocol group was significantly higher than that in the GnRH agonist long protocol group (59.83% vs. 56.51%, P=0.0093), while there was no significant difference compared to that of the early follicular phase long protocol group (P>0.05). In the three age groups, we found that there were no significant differences in clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, and neonatal outcome indicators (fetal weight and Apgar score) among the three stimulation protocols (antagonist protocol, GnRH agonist long protocol, and early follicular phase long protocol) (P>0.05). The findings showed no significant differences between clinical and neonatal outcomes in patients of all ages, regardless of the ovarian stimulation protocol, suggesting that the three ovarian stimulation protocols have similar therapeutic effects in patients of different ages. The results of this study have important implications for the selection of an appropriate ovarian stimulation protocol and the prediction of treatment outcomes. Conclusion: In the younger than 30 and 30-35 age groups, the GnRH antagonist protocol showed a more significant advantage over the GnRH agonist long protocol and the early follicular phase long protocol. This suggests that for younger and middle-aged patients, the antagonist protocol may lead to better outcomes during ovarian stimulation. In the older than 35 age group, while the antagonist protocol still outperformed the GnRH agonist long protocol, there was no significant difference compared to the early follicular phase long protocol. This may imply that with increasing age, the early follicular phase long protocol may have effects similar to the antagonist protocol to some extent. The advantages of the antagonist protocol lie in its ability to reduce stimulation duration and the dosage of GnRH, while enhancing patient compliance with treatment. This means that patients may find it easier to accept and adhere to this treatment protocol, thereby improving treatment success rates. Particularly for older patients, the use of the antagonist protocol may significantly increase the blastocyst formation rate, which is crucial for improving the success rates. Although there were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes of patients treated with the three protocols in each age group, further research is still needed to validate these findings. Future multicenter studies and increased sample sizes may help comprehensively assess the efficacy of different stimulation protocols. Additionally, prospective studies are needed to further validate these findings and determine the optimal treatment strategies.

Efficacy of GnRH Pulses in Hypogonadism Secondary to Primary Empty Sella: Case Report.

This study aims to assess the effectiveness of pulsed gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) micropump replacement therapy in the treatment of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH) caused by primary empty sella (PES).The efficacy of pulsed GnRH replacement therapy using the micropump was evaluated in a middle-aged male patient with HH who had experienced the loss of his only child. Relevant literature was also consulted to compare the differences between pulse GnRH treatment and conventional treatment in terms of the development of secondary sexual characteristics, sex hormone levels, sperm production rate, and sperm activity rate in male patient with HH.In this report, a 45-year-old male diagnosed with HH and PES presented with fatigue and decreased libido. The main characteristics included decreased follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels of 0.03 mIU/mL, luteinizing hormone (LH) levels of 0.02 mIU/mL, and testosterone (T) levels of 0.72 nmol/L. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed an empty sella. Semen analysis showed a small number of normal sperm with reduced motility. During treatment with the micropump pulse GnRH, the patient experienced no side effects and showed improvements in fatigue, reduced libido, sexual urge, anxiety, and feelings of inferiority. LH, FSH, and T levels returned to normal, while sperm activity rate increased to 79.9%. Ultimately, the patient's spouse achieved a natural pregnancy.Pulsed gonadotropin delivery using the micropump demonstrates good efficacy and tolerability, and aligns more closely with the physiological rhythm of GnRH secretion in the human body.

Hormonal male contraception.

INTRODUCTION: Male contraception with exogenously administered hormones suppresses both luteinizing hormone and follicle stimulating hormone leading to low intratesticular testosterone concentration. This results in reversible suppression of spermatogenesis and marked decrease in sperm output in the ejaculate and preventing pregnancy in the female partner. PRIOR STUDIES: Studies of testosterone administered alone or in combination of another gonadotropin suppressive agent such as a progestin or gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) analog showed decisively that the exogenous hormone administrations are effective in suppressing sperm output with few adverse events that are not anticipated. In contraceptive efficacy studies, testosterone alone or combined with a progestin are as effective in preventing pregnancies as female contraceptive methods. CONCLUSION: Hormone combinations for male contraception are in late-phase clinical trials and hold the promise of being the new, reversible contraception method for men in over half a century. Lessons learned from the male hormonal contraceptive development pave the way for new targeted approached to regulate male fertility.

Mental Health Diagnoses and Suicidality Among Transgender Youth in Hospital Settings.

Purpose: The purpose of this analysis is to: 1) describe the most common mental health diagnoses in the emergency department (ED) and inpatient hospital settings among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth vs. matched controls and 2) evaluate if a gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) prescription decreased the risk of suicidality within these settings. Methods: Using the PEDSnet dataset (years 2009-2019), TGD youth aged 8-18 (n = 3414, with a median age at last visit of 16.2 [14.4, 17.7] years, were propensity-score matched to controls (n = 13,628, age 16.6 [14.2, 18.3] years). Relative risks of the most common mental health diagnoses within ED and inpatient settings were calculated for TGD youth compared with controls. Recurrent time-to-event analysis was used to examine whether GAHT or GnRHa attenuated the risk of suicidality among subsamples of TGD youth. Results: TGD youth had a higher relative risk (95% confidence interval [CI]) of mental health diagnoses and suicidality in the ED (5.46 [4.71-6.33]) and inpatient settings (6.61 [5.28-8.28]) than matched controls. TGD youth prescribed GAHT had a 43.6% lower risk of suicidality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.564 [95% CI 0.36-0.89]) compared with those never prescribed GAHT during our study period or before GAHT initiation. TGD youth who were prescribed GnRHa therapy had a nonstatistically significant reduction in ED or inpatient suicidality diagnoses compared with those never prescribed GnRHa (HR = 0.79 [0.47-1.31]). Conclusion: Although risk of mental health diagnoses and suicidality in ED and inpatient settings was high among TGD youth, a GAHT prescription was associated with a significant reduction in suicidality risk.

Effectiveness of high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or combined with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for adenomyosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist (GnRH-a) and levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) are conventional conservative treatments for adenomyosis, and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a novel ablation technique. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of HIFU combined with GnRH-a or LNG-IUS for adenomyosis patients. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases were searched up to December 2021. Published studies comparing HIFU plus GnRH-a with HIFU plus LNG-IUS in adenomyosis patients were assessed for eligibility by two independent authors. Risk of bias tool was utilized for risk evaluation. We selected treatment effective rate of dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) as the primary outcome; effective rate of menorrhagia severity and reduction rate of adenomyotic lesion as the secondary outcomes. Adverse effects were assessed. Four studies with a total 729 patients were enrolled in the meta-analysis. HIFU plus LNG-IUS showed lower dysmenorrhea [within 6 months: risk ratio (RR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-0.93, p < 0.00001; over 1 year: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.65-0.82, p < 0.00001] and less menorrhagia severity (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.60-0.66, p < 0.00001) than HIFU plus GnRH-a. Both groups demonstrated equal efficacy in adenomyotic lesion reduction rate (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.97-1.09, p = 0.30). Adverse effects happened equally in both groups. Combination therapy of HIFU and LNG-IUS revealed better effectiveness in treating dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia than that of HIFU and GnRH-a. However, interpreting the conclusion should be approached with caution as a result of significant heterogeneity.

Impact of Luteinizing Hormone on IVF/ICSI Assisted Reproduction on the Initiation Day of Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to explore the optimal timing of gonadotropin initiation and the reasonable interval of luteinizing hormone (LH) levels in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-A) protocol. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the data concerning the oocyte retrieval cycles from 1,361 cases with the GnRH-A protocol implemented. The ovarian responses (including AMH, AFC) in these patients were divided into the poor ovarian response group (an antral follicle count [AFC] ≤ 6, n = 394), the normal ovarian response group (an AFC > 6 and < 15, n = 570), and the high ovarian response group (an AFC ≥ 15, n = 397), according to the AFC. The patients were sub-grouped according to LH levels on the protocol initiation day, and the clinical outcomes (including dose of Gn initiation, Gn administration days, GnRH-ant administration days, P levels on the HCG day, E2 levels on the HCG day, LH levels on the HCG day, number of embryos transferred, total fertilization rate, embryo implantation rate(%), proportion of 2PN, proportion of good-quality embryos, endometrial thickness on the hCG injection day(mm), moderate to severe OHSS, AFC on the initiation day, proportion of type A endometrium on the hCG injection day, clinical pregnancy rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, early abortion rate, ectopic pregnancy rate) were compared. RESULTS: On the GnRH-A protocol initiation day, among all patients with different ovarian responses, the body mass index (BMI) in those with an LH ≥ 5 IU/L was lower. The differences in pregnancy outcomes between the LH < 5 IU/L group and the LH ≥ 5 IU/L group were not statistically significant across the different ovarian response groups, but the LH < 5 IU/L group had a higher proportion of good-quality embryos (80.3±24.9 vs. 74.8±26.9, P =0.035) than the LH≥5IU/Lgroup in those with poor ovarian response. The total fertilization rate (82.2±18.1 vs 85.4±15.1, P =0.021) and proportion of two pronuclei (2PN) (69.0±20.9 vs 72.7±19.9, P =0.035) were higher in the LH ≥ 5 IU/L group than the LH<5 IU/L group for those with normal ovarian responses. The embryo implantation rate (41.4±41.3 vs 52.6±43.4, P =0.012) was higher in the LH ≥ 5 IU/L group than in the LH<5 IU/L group in those with high ovarian response. The results of the multivariate logistic analysis showed that the age of the female partner, number of embryos transferred, proportion of good-quality embryos, endometrial thickness on the hCG injection day, and moderate- to-severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) were independent factors correlated with the outcome of live births (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The LH levels on the gonadotropins (Gn) initiation day in the GnRH-A protocol will not affect pregnancy outcomes.

Characterization of corazonin signaling in a molluscan model species, Lymnaea stagnalis.

In recent years, new concepts have emerged regarding the nomenclature, functions, and relationships of different peptide families of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) superfamily. One of the main driving forces for this originated from the emerging evidence that neuropeptides previously called molluscan GnRH are multifunctional and should be classified as corazonin (CRZ). However, research articles still appear that use incorrect nomenclature and attribute the same function to molluscan CRZs as vertebrate GnRHs. The aim of the present study was to further support the recent interpretation of the origin and function of the GnRH superfamily. Towards this goal, we report the characterization of CRZ signaling system in the molluscan model species, the great pond snail (Lymnaea stagnalis). We detected a CRZ-receptor-like sequence (Lym-CRZR) by homology-searching in the Lymnaea transcriptomes and the deduced amino acid sequence showed high sequence similarity to GnRH receptors and CRZ receptors. Molecular phylogenetic tree analysis demonstrated that Lym-CRZR is included in the cluster of molluscan CRZRs. Lym-CRZR transiently transfected into HEK293 cells was found to be localized at the plasma membrane, confirming that it functions as a membrane receptor, like other G protein-coupled receptors. The signaling assays revealed that the previously identified Lym-CRZ neuropeptide stimulated intracellular Ca2+ mobilization in a dose-dependent manner, but not cyclic AMP production, in HEK293 cells transfected with Lym-CRZR. Finally, we demonstrated a wide tissue distribution of Lym-CRZR. These results suggest that Lym-CRZ is a multifunctional peptide and provide further insights into the evolution of the GnRH neuropeptide superfamily. The present study also supports the notion that previously termed molluscan "GnRH" should be classified as "CRZ".

Can We Harvest More Mature Oocytes by Repeating Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Doses in Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Patients at Risk of OHSS in Antagonist Cycles? A Randomised Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing debate about the optimal dosage of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist for oocyte triggering in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patients at risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). In this study, we intend to ascertain whether the use of repeated doses of a GnRH agonist for oocyte triggering in these patients can enhance the outcomes of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for in vitro fertilization/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomised clinical trial enrolled 70 PCOS women candidates for IVF/ICSI with the standard antagonist protocol at Royan Institute (Tehran, Iran) from May 2020 to June 2022. Patients at risk of OHSS with oestradiol (E2) levels >3000 pg/ml on the day of trigger were randomly assigned to a control or experimental group. Group A (control group) patients received 0.2 mg triptorelin (Decapeptyl®) for final oocyte maturation. Group B (experimental group) patients received a second dose of 0.1 mg Decapeptyl®12 hours after their first dose, for a total dose of 0.3 mg. IVF/ICSI outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Ultimately, 35 women from the study group and 33 from the control group completed the treatment cycle. Both groups were comparable in terms of demographic characteristics, baseline hormonal profiles, and PCOS phenotypes. The dosage of gonadotropin, stimulation duration, number of retrieved oocytes, oocyte maturation rate, and oocyte recovery ratio did not significantly differ between the groups. No significant differences were found in terms of the number of blastocyst and cleavage embryos, nor the quality of obtained embryos between the groups. The mild to moderate OHSS rate was significantly lower in the study group (P=0.038). CONCLUSION: A second dose of GnRH agonist 12 hours after the first dose did not improve the number and maturity of oocytes, or pregnancy outcomes in PCOS patients (registration number: NCT04600986).

Metabolomics analysis of the effect of GnRH on the pregnancy rate of ewes with estrus synchronization scheme based on progesterone.

Introduction: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) is widely used in the timed artificial insemination protocol for sheep. However, there remains a debate regarding its impact on pregnancy rates during artificial insemination. This study aims to evaluate the effect of GnRH on the pregnancy rates in Huyang ewes, analyze the pre-implantation metabolite changes caused by GnRH using metabolomics, and elucidate the mechanism effect on pregnancy rates. Methods: All ewes were administered a vaginal progesterone sponge containing 45 mg of flurogestone acetate for 12 days and received 330 units of equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) intramuscularly after sponge removal. The experimental group (n = 69) received an intramuscular treatment of 17 µg GnRH agonist triptorelin 48 h after sponge removal on Day 0, while the control group (n = 41) received 1 mL of sterile saline solution. All ewes underwent a single vaginal insemination 58 h after the withdrawal of the progesterone sponge. The difference in pregnancy rates between the two groups was calculated. Metabolomic analysis was performed on plasma samples collected on Day 7 after the treatment of GnRH agonist. Results: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) treatment significantly reduced the pregnancy rate in the experimental group compared with the control group (72.2 vs. 82.9%, p < 0.05). Metabolomic analysis indicated that GnRH treatment affected metabolites involved in collagen synthesis and prostaglandin synthesis in the endometrial tissue, which includes a marked decrease in hydroxyproline amino acid content and a significant increase in corticosterone and prostaglandin D2 lipids and unsaturated fatty acids. Conclusion: In summary, the injection of GnRH agonist Triptorelin 48 h after progesterone sponges removal reduces the pregnancy rate of Huyang ewe following artificial insemination. It also affects the metabolite levels related to endometrial collagen and prostaglandin synthesis, harming embryo implantation.

Pharmacological methods for ovarian function and fertility preservation in women with cancer: A literature review.

Oncofertility is an extremely significant topic that is increasingly being discussed owing to increased evidence indicating that fertility preservation does not affect the treatment outcomes of patients with cancer but significantly contributes to preserving life quality. The effect of chemotherapy can range from minimal effects to complete ovarian atrophy. Limited data are available on the effects of monoclonal antibodies and targeted therapies on the ovaries and fertility. Temporary ovarian suppression by administering a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) during chemotherapy decreases the gonadotoxic effect of chemotherapy, thereby diminishing the chance of developing premature ovarian insufficiency (POI). At present, the concomitant administration of GnRH analogs during chemotherapy is the only accepted pharmacological method for preserving ovarian function. Notably, most randomized studies on the effectiveness of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists during chemotherapy in preventing POI have been conducted in women with breast cancer, with a considerably small number of studies on patients with hematological malignancies. Furthermore, most randomized controlled trials on breast cancer have revealed a decrease in treatment-induced POI risk, regardless of the hormone receptor status. In addition, studies on hematological malignancies have yielded negative results; nevertheless, the findings must be interpreted with caution owing to numerous limitations. Current guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines recommend sperm, oocyte, and embryo cryopreservation as a standard practice and only offering GnRHa to patients when proven fertility preservation methods are not feasible. In this manuscript, we present a comprehensive literature overview on the application of ovarian suppression with GnRHa during chemotherapy in patients with cancer by addressing preclinical and clinical data, as well as future perspectives in this field that upcoming research should focus on.

Insulin sensitivity, body composition and bone mineral density after testosterone treatment in transgender youth with and without prior GnRH agonist therapy.

Background: 1.8% of youth identify as transgender; a growing proportion are transgender male (female sex, male gender identity). Many receive gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) therapy to suppress endogenous puberty and/or will start testosterone to induce secondary sex characteristics that align with gender identity. Objectives: To determine the effects of 12 months of testosterone on cardiometabolic health among transgender youth, including insulin sensitivity, body composition, and bone mineral density and whether changes in outcomes differ based on prior GnRHa treatment. Methods: Participants (n = 19, baseline age 15.0 ± 1.0 years) were examined prior to and 12 months after testosterone therapy in a longitudinal observational study. Fasted morning blood draw, a 2-hour 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test, body composition and bone mineral density (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) were assessed at baseline and 12 months. Insulin sensitivity was estimated by HOMA-IR and Matsuda index. Changes were compared with mixed linear regression models evaluating time (baseline, 12 months), group (GnRHa treatment yes/no), and their interaction. Results: In the entire cohort, fasted insulin decreased (median [25,75 %ile]: -3 [-5, 0] mIU/L, p = 0.044) and 2-hour glucose increased (mean ± standard deviation): +18.5 ± 28.9 mg/dL, p = 0.013 from baseline after 12 months of testosterone therapy. There were no significant changes in HOMA-IR (p = 0.062) or Matsuda index (p = 0.096), nor by GnRHa status. Absolute (+6.2 [4.7, 7.5] kg, p = 0.016) and percent fat-free mass increased (+7.3 [5.4, 9.1] %, p = 0.003) and percent fat mass declined (-7.4 [-9.3, 5.3]%, p = 0.005) for the entire cohort. There were time*group interactions for absolute (p = 0.0007) and percent fat-free mass (p = 0.033). There were time*group interactions for bone mineral content (p = 0.006). Conclusions: Twelve months of testosterone in transgender adolescents resulted in changes in body composition and bone mineral density, with baseline differences between the +/-GnRHa group and convergence after 12 months. There were no changes in insulin sensitivity over time or between groups.

Pregnancy co-treated with oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in a woman with premature ovarian insufficiency: a case report.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of pregnancy with a healthy baby after treatment with an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist in women with premature ovarian insufficiency. A 36-year-old female presented at our hospital after being diagnosed with premature ovarian insufficiency by a previous doctor. We administered clomiphene, human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG), and GnRH antagonist (injection) together with estrogen replacement for 11 cycles (27 months), but no follicular development was observed. When the oral GnRH antagonist (relugolix), which has recently become available, was used in the 12th cycle, follicular growth of 13 mm was confirmed on the 14th day of stimulation. After stimulation, the use of hMG and GnRH antagonist (injection) was continued, and a maturation trigger, human chorionic gonadotropin 10000 IU, was administered. Oocyte retrieval was performed successfully, intracytoplasmic sperm injection and frozen embryo transfer were performed, and fetal heartbeat was confirmed. The patient was admitted to the perinatal management facility. She delivered a healthy baby of 3,732 g via cesarean section at 41 weeks +2. This case shows the possibility of using an oral GnRH antagonist as an option for infertility treatment.

Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist Protocol Improves Pregnancy Outcomes During In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) Treatment in Young Infertile Women: A Retrospective Study.

Objective The objective of this study was to determine if gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) or gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocols during in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment in young infertile women improve their pregnancy outcomes. Methodology We retrospectively reviewed the records of 876 young infertile women aged 20-35 years who underwent fresh embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles. The data were collected from their initial visits to the reproductive medicine center of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between January 2019 and December 2022. We divided them into two groups according to the controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocols: GnRH-a (n = 580) and GnRH-ant (n = 296). The primary outcome assessed in this study was the live birth rate. The secondary observation indicators included the total dose and duration of gonadotropin (Gn), total embryo transfer, day three (D3) embryo transfer, total two pro-nuclei (2PN) cleavage count, number of fertilizations, and implantation rate. Results The live birth rate had no clinical significance (P > 0.05). The total dose and duration of Gn stimulation in the GnRH-ant group were lower than in the GnRH-a group (P  < 0.05). The total embryo transfer, D3 embryo transfer, total cleavage count, total 2PN cleavage count, number of fertilizations, transfer, and mature oocytes in metaphase II (MII) of D3 embryos in the GnRH-a group were higher than those in the GnRH-ant group (P  < 0.05). The clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate of the GnRH-a group were higher than those of the control group. Conclusions The total embryo transfer, D3 embryo transfer, total cleavage count, total 2PN cleavage count, number of fertilizations, transfer and MII of D3 embryos, clinical pregnancy, and implantation rates were significantly higher in the GnRH-a protocol group. The total dosage of Gn and duration of Gn stimulation were lower in the GnRH-ant group than in the GnRH-a group. These findings provide the basis for the selection of the COH protocol in normal Chinese ovarian response patients undergoing IVF/ICSI.

Exercise-induced muscle hormone "irisin" controls luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone secretion by bovine gonadotrophs.

Irisin is a hormone secreted by muscle in response to exercise. The irisin receptor (IrisinR) is a heterodimer of integrin alpha V (ITGAV) and integrin beta 5 (ITGB5) subunits. Since irisin may mediate some beneficial effects of exercise on animal reproduction, we tested the hypothesis that bovine gonadotrophs express IrisinR and irisin stimulates luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) secretion by gonadotrophs. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction was used to detect the mRNA expression of both ITGAV and ITGB5 in the anterior pituitary glands (APs) of post pubertal heifers and mouse gonadotroph cell line "LßT2." Western blotting was used to detect protein expression in bovine APs. Immunofluorescence microscopy, utilizing the same antibody, visualized IrisinR on the plasma membrane of majority of gonadotrophs. We prepared AP cells from healthy postpubertal heifers, cultured them for 3.5 d, and treated them with increasing concentrations (0, 0.01, 0.1, 1, or 10 nM) of irisin for 5 min before either no treatment or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulation. After 2 h, media were harvested for LH and FSH assays. Irisin (0.1-10 nM) stimulated basal LH and FSH secretion, and these stimulatory effects were inhibited by the extracellular signal-regulated kinase or SMAD pathway inhibitors. In the presence of GnRH, irisin at 0.01-1 nM stimulated LH and FSH secretion. A higher dose of irisin (10 nM), however, suppressed the GnRH-induced LH and FSH levels. In conclusion, bovine gonadotrophs expressed IrisinR, and irisin controlled LH and FSH secretion from bovine gonadotrophs.

Retrospective evaluation of patients diagnosed with central precocious puberty who reached the final height.

OBJECTIVES: Central precocious puberty (CPP) is the onset of puberty before the age of 8 in girls and 9 in boys. The primary goal of CPP treatment is control and arrest of puberty development. In this study, it was aimed to determine the factors associated with final height in patients who received gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs (GnRHa) treatment and reached their final height. METHODS: From the medical records of the patients, age on admission, bone age (BA), weight-standard deviation score (SDS), height-SDS, BMI-SDS, target height-SDS, basal LH, FSH, E2, age at menarche, and pelvic USG findings were obtained. RESULTS: The mean age on admission of the 67 female patients was 7.5 ± 0.60 years. On admission, 4.5 % of the patients were obese and 19.4 % were overweight. There was no difference between BMI-SDS at admission and after treatment. The mean age at menarche was 11.57 ± 0.78 years. About 58.2 % of the patients reached the target height, 35.8 % exceeded the target height, and 6 % were below the target height. The mean height-SDS and predicted adult height (PAH) on admission were better in patients who exceeded the target height. It was determined that target height-SDS had a positive effect on delta height-SDS, while BA/CA ratio had a negative effect. CONCLUSIONS: It was found that GnRHa treatment did not have a negative effect on BMI-SDS. It was shown that 94 % of the patients who received GnRHa treatment reached the target height, and in fact, 35.8 % exceeded the target height. A greater final height may be associated with good height-SDS and PAH values on admission.