Evaluating postoperative outcome assessment tools in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: A comparative analysis of the comprehensive complication index and Clavien-Dindo classification in a cohort of 1240 patients at a tertiary care center.

Introduction: The comprehensive complication index (CCI) has emerged as a new tool for reporting postoperative complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of CCI and Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC) in measuring postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery. Materials and methods: In this single-centered, prospective, comparative study conducted between January 2022 and March 2023, 1240 patients underwent HPB surgery, including laparoscopic cholecystectomies and complex HPB surgery. Postoperative complications were evaluated utilizing the CCI and CDC indices, and their relationships with length of ICU stay, hospital stay, and return to activity were compared. Results: A total of 117 patients (9.44%) experienced complications of varying grades. There was a strong correlation between CCI and CDC (r=0.982, P <0.001). Both CCI and CDC demonstrated a strong correlation with the length of hospital stay, ICU stay, and return to normal activity. While CCI showed a better correlation with the length of hospital stay (r=0.706 vs. 0.695) and return to normal activity (r=0.620 vs. 0.611) than CDC, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: CCI exhibited a stronger correlation with the length of stay and return to activity; however, no statistically significant advantage was observed over CDC.

Advancing minimally invasive hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: ensuring safety with implementation.

BACKGROUND: Although minimally invasive hepato-pancreato-biliary (MIS HPB) surgery can be performed with good outcomes, there are currently no standardized requirements for centers or surgeons who wish to implement MIS HPB surgery. The aim of this study was to create a consensus statement regarding safe dissemination and implementation of MIS HPB surgical programs. METHODS: Sixteen key questions regarding safety in MIS HPB surgery were generated after a focused literature search and iterative review by three field experts. Participants for the working group were then selected using sequential purposive sampling and snowball techniques. Review of the 16 questions took place over a single 2-h meeting. The senior author facilitated the session, and a modified nominal group technique was used. RESULTS: Twenty three surgeons were in attendance. All participants agreed or strongly agreed that formal guidelines should exist for both institutions and individual surgeons interested in implementing MIS HPB surgery and that routine monitoring and reporting of institutional and surgeon technical outcomes should be performed. Regarding volume cutoffs, most participants (91%) agreed or strongly agreed that a minimum annual institutional volume cutoff for complex MIS HPB surgery, such as major hepatectomy or pancreaticoduodenectomy, should exist. A smaller proportion (74%) agreed or strongly agreed that a minimum annual surgeon volume requirement should exist. The majority of participants agreed or strongly agreed that surgeons were responsible for defining (100%) and enforcing (78%) guidelines to ensure the overall safety of MIS HPB programs. Finally, formal MIS HPB training, minimum case volume requirements, institutional support and infrastructure, and mandatory collection of outcomes data were all recognized as important aspects of safe implementation of MIS HPB surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Safe implementation of MIS HPB surgery requires a thoughtful process that incorporates structured training, sufficient volume and expertise, a proper institutional ecosystem, and monitoring of outcomes.

Cross-fellowship Inter-institutional Exchange: Answering the Call for Hepatopancreatobiliary Training Standardization.

OBJECTIVE: General surgery trainees interested in performing hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery can choose from multiple fellowship pathways, namely HPB, surgical oncology (SO), and abdominal transplant-HPB (TXP-HPB). Although focused on similar operations, each program offers distinct clinical and technical emphases. DESIGN: An annual inter-institutional exchange between TXP-HPB and SO fellowships, starting in 2014. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: TXP-HPB fellows from Washington University in St. Louis (WUSTL) and SO fellows from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC). RESULTS: About 14 fellows have participated in the exchange so far, 13 of whom responded to our survey. At MSKCC, TXP-HPB fellows performed a median of 24 cases, including 6 major pancreatic resections, 3 major hepatectomies, 4 hepatic artery infusion pump insertions, and 1 major biliary case. At WUSTL, SO fellows performed a median of 16 cases, including 5 liver transplants, 2 major pancreatic resections, 2 major hepatectomies, and 2 major biliary cases. About 92.3% of respondents stated they would repeat the rotation, with SO fellows emphasizing the exposure to vascular anastomoses and transplant-HPB fellows appreciating the oncologic focus. CONCLUSIONS: A monthlong inter-institutional exchange offers a unique opportunity to standardize and improve HPB education.

Safety of postdischarge extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after hepatopancreatobiliary surgery.

BACKGROUND: The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery is high. Extended postdischarge prophylaxis in this patient population has been controversial. This study aimed to examine the safety of postdischarge extended VTE prophylaxis in patients at high risk of VTE events after HPB surgery. METHODS: Adult patients risk stratified as very high risk of VTE who underwent HPB operations between 2014 and 2020 at a quaternary care center were included. Patients were matched 1:2 extended VTE prophylaxis to the control group (patients who did not receive extended prophylaxis). Analyses compared the proportions of adverse bleeding events between groups. RESULTS: A total of 307 patients were included: 103 in the extended prophylaxis group and 204 in the matched control group. Demographics were similar between groups. More patients in the extended VTE prophylaxis group had a history of VTE (9% vs 3%; P = .045). There was no difference in bleeding events between the extended VTE prophylaxis and the control group (6% vs 2%; P = .091). Of the 6 patients with bleeding events in the VTE prophylaxis group, 5 had gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, and 1 had hemarthrosis. Of the 4 patients with bleeding events in the control group, 1 had intra-abdominal bleeding, 2 had GI bleeding, and 1 had intra-abdominal and GI bleeding. CONCLUSION: Patients discharged with extended VTE prophylaxis after HPB surgery did not experience more adverse bleeding events compared with a matched control group. Routine postdischarge extended VTE prophylaxis is safe in patients at high risk of postoperative VTE after HPB surgery.

Implementation of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy at a community tertiary care hospital utilizing a comprehensive curriculum.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the outcomes of a robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) program implemented at a community tertiary care hospital. METHODS: A retrospective review of 65 RPD cases compared surgical outcomes and performance to benchmark data. RESULTS: Postoperative complications occurred in 31% (20) of patients vs. ≤73% (variance -42), with grade IV complications in 3% (2) vs. ≤5% (variance -2). Postoperative pancreatic fistula type B frequency was 12% (8) vs. ≤15% (variance -3). One 90-day mortality occurred (1.5% vs. 1.6%). Failure to rescue rate was 7% vs. ≤9% (variance -2), and R1 resection rate was 2% vs. ≤39% (variance -37). There was a downward trend of operative time (rho â€‹= â€‹-0.600, P â€‹< â€‹0.001), with a learning curve of 27 cases. Median hospital length of stay was 6 days vs. ≤15 days (variance -9). CONCLUSION: Our comprehensive RPD training program resulted in improved operative performance and outcomes commensurate with benchmark thresholds.

The application and prospection of augmented reality in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery.

Augmented Reality (AR) is one of the main forms of Extended Reality (XR) application in surgery. hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgeons could benefit from AR as an efficient tool for making surgical plans, providing intraoperative navigation, and enhancing surgical skills. The introduction of AR to HPB surgery is less than 30 years but brings profound influence. From the early days of projecting liver models on patients' surfaces for locating a better puncture point to today's assisting surgeons to perform live donor liver transplantation, a series of successful clinical practices have proved that AR can play a constructive role in HPB surgery and has great potential. Thus far, AR has been shown to increase efficiency and safety in surgical resection, and, at the same time, can improve oncological outcomes and reduce surgical risk. Although AR has presented admitted advantages in surgery, AR's application is still immature as an emerging technique and needs more exploration. In this paper, we reviewed the principles of AR and its developing history in HPB surgery, describing its significant practical applications over the past 30 years. Reviewing the past attempts of AR in HPB surgery could make HPB surgeons a better understanding of future surgery and the digital trends in medicine. The routine uses of AR in HPB surgery, as an indication of the operating room entering the new era, is coming soon.

A narrative review of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a surgical curative option.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second commonest primary liver malignancy. Nowadays, the only available treatment with curative intent of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is surgical resection, with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 25-40%. However, recurrence rate remains high. In this comprehensive review, we describe the newest surgical strategies for iCCA management, including vascular resection, the role of mini-invasive surgery, liver transplant, strategies for future liver remnant augmentation, and the role of neoadjuvant therapies. METHODS: A review of medical databases (PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Database) was conducted selecting most relevant articles in English language without a specific timeframe. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Multifocal presentation, vascular, perineural invasion, and lymph nodes involvement are associated with poor outcome. Prognostic factors are being investigated to improve therapeutic approach and outcomes. The role of lymph nodes dissection remains debated. Harvesting at least 6 lymph nodes is recommended to ensure accurate nodal staging. Liver transplantation (LT) recently represented a treatment option only in patients with unresectable early disease (≤2 cm). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment for patients with CCA, but continue understanding in diagnosis, operative technique and chemotherapies are changing the landscape in the prognosis. Multicentric and randomized studies are necessaries in the future research with the intent to personalize the treatments, improve patient selection for the resection and reduce recurrence rate.

Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials.

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is scarce and limited to non-randomized studies. This study aimed to compare oncological and surgical outcomes after MIPD compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) for patients after resectable PDAC from published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify RCTs comparing MIPD and OPD including PDAC (Jan 2015-July 2021). Individual data of patients with PDAC were requested. Primary outcomes were R0 rate and lymph node yield. Secondary outcomes were blood-loss, operation time, major complications, hospital stay and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Overall, 4 RCTs (all addressed laparoscopic MIPD) with 275 patients with PDAC were included. In total, 128 patients underwent laparoscopic MIPD and 147 patients underwent OPD. The R0 rate (risk difference(RD) -1%, P = 0.740) and lymph node yield (mean difference(MD) +1.55, P = 0.305) were comparable between laparoscopic MIPD and OPD. Laparoscopic MIPD was associated with less perioperative blood-loss (MD -91ml, P = 0.026), shorter length of hospital stay (MD -3.8 days, P = 0.044), while operation time was longer (MD +98.5 min, P = 0.003). Major complications (RD -11%, P = 0.302) and 90-day mortality (RD -2%, P = 0.328) were comparable between laparoscopic MIPD and OPD. CONCLUSIONS: This individual patient data meta-analysis of MIPD versus OPD in patients with resectable PDAC suggests that laparoscopic MIPD is non-inferior regarding radicality, lymph node yield, major complications and 90-day mortality and is associated with less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and longer operation time. The impact on long-term survival and recurrence should be studied in RCTs including robotic MIPD.

Neuraxial anesthesia in hepato-pancreatic-bilio surgery: a first western pilot study of 46 patients.

The most common anesthetic approach in hepato-pancreatic-biliary (HPB) surgery is general anesthesia (GA), but it may result in increased morbidity and mortality and peri-operative risks especially in frail patients. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of neuraxial anesthesia (NA) in HPB in a pilot clinical series. This analysis was conducted on 46 consecutive patients undergoing HPB surgery in an Italian Tertial referral center. Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA), combined spino-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) and peridural anesthesia (PA) were used in major and minor hepatectomies and bilio-pancreatic surgery instead of GA. NA was evaluated by analyzing the surgical and anesthesiological short-term outcomes. 46 patients were considered eligible for the study between February 2018 and May 2020. The average age was 69.07 (± 9.95) years. 22 were males and 24 were females. According to the ASA score, 19 (41.30%) patients had ASA II, 22 (47.83%) had ASA III and 5 (10.87%) had ASA IV. 22 (47.83%) patients underwent CSA, 20 (43.48%) CSEA and 4 (8.69%) PA. We performed 8 major and 19 minor hepatectomies, 7 bilio-digestive derivations, 5 Whipple procedures, 4 iatrogenic biliary duct injuries, 2 splenopancreatectomies and 1 hepatic cyst fenestration. Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 was observed in 3 patients. The conversion rate to endotracheal intubation occurring in 3 of 46 (6.52%) patients. After surgery, no local or pulmonary complications and delirium were reported in our series. The present study demonstrates that NA is a safe and feasible option in selected patients, if performed in referral centers by well-trained anaesthesiologists and surgeons.

Induction Implications: Shaping the Competence and Confidence of Junior Doctors Within Complex Medical Specialties.

Introduction The newly qualified junior doctors in the United Kingdom face challenges due to their limited experience and unfamiliarity with their rotations. We aim to share the experience of establishing a hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery-specific induction program at the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust and assess its impact on doctors' knowledge and experience. Methods A booklet was distributed to new junior doctors, and a two-hour structured teaching session was also conducted, with pre- and post-session assessments using multiple-choice questions and a feedback survey. The survey measured understanding of HPB anatomy, interventions, and satisfaction with the teaching methodology. Results The pre-session questionnaire included 22 participants, while the post-session had 20 participants. Regarding HPB anatomy understanding, in the pre-session, six (28.6%) and 11 (52.4%) participants reported levels 2 and 3, respectively, while levels 4 and 5 were reported by three (13.3%) and one (4.8%) participants. In the post-session, levels 4 and 5 were reported by six (30%) and 13 (65%), with only one (5%) reporting level 3 and none at levels 1 or 2. Similar trends were observed in understanding HPB investigation. In the pre-session, levels 2 and 3 were reported by eight (36.4%) and 11 (50%), while levels 4 and 5 were reported by two (9.1%) and one (4%). In the post-session, eight (40%) and 11 (55%) reported levels 4 and 5, with only one (5%) at level 3 and none at levels 1 or 2. For HPB management methods before teaching, levels 2 and 3 were equally reported by eight (36.4%), level 4 by four (22.7%), and none at level 5. After teaching, nine (45%) and 10 (50%) reported levels 4 and 5, with only one (5%) at level 3 and none at levels 1 or 2. Factual knowledge showed a 38% increase, rising from 49% pre-session to 87% post-session. In post-session feedback, 12 (60%) strongly agreed that the session helped augment their medical practice, and six (30%) agreed, with two (10%) neutral. Feedback on the teaching session's organization was positive, with 13 (65%) strongly agreeing that it was structured coherently, and six (30%) agreeing, with only one (5%) neutral regarding the clarity of the structure and delivery method. Conclusion Specialty-specific induction programs are crucial for providing support and ensuring the development of competent doctors. Efforts should be made to create supportive working environments for junior doctors to alleviate stress and improve their well-being.

Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgical Outcomes at a Community Hospital.

There is a national trend towards regionalizing complex hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) surgeries to high-volume institutions. Due to geographic and socioeconomic constraints, however, many patients in the United States continue to undergo HPB surgery at local community hospitals. This study evaluated complex HPB surgeries performed by a single surgeon at a low-volume community hospital from May 2007 to June 2021. A retrospective review of medical records (n=163) was done to collect data on patient demographics and outcomes. Surgical outcomes of HPB procedures were compared to published data from high-volume centers. Overall mortality within 30 days of the procedure was 1% (n=1). Using Clavien-Dindo classification, the major complication rate was 10%, including 8% grade III and 2% grade IV complications. Reoperation (2%) and readmission (3%) were rare in this population. Median length of stay was 7 days and median estimated blood loss was 500 milliliters. Surgical outcomes from the community hospital were comparable to high-volume centers. For pancreatic cancer patients treated at the community hospital, Kaplan-Meier curves revealed comparable 5-year survival time to national data. Complex HPB procedures can be safely performed at a low-volume hospital in Hawai'i with outcomes comparable to large tertiary centers.

Symptomatic Pancreaticojejunal Anastomotic Stricture After Pancreaticoduodenectomy Managed by Longitudinal Pancreaticogastrostomy: A Report of Two Cases.

Symptomatic pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stricture is a rare complication following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Literature for the management of pancreaticojejunal anastomotic strictures is limited. Revision of pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis, endoscopic dilation, stenting of pancreaticojejunal stricture, and modified Puestow procedure have all been described with variable outcomes. We present a report of two patients who developed symptomatic pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stricture following a pancreaticoduodenectomy, managed by longitudinal pancreaticogastrostomy with no complications, and resolution of symptoms with an average follow-up interval of 45 months.

Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy, comparing therapeutic indexes; a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a challenging procedure with peri-operative complications. Robotic surgery offers improved dexterity, visibility, and accessibility. Recently, many centres have reported improved clinical outcomes for robotic PD. We reviewed the safety and efficacy of robotic PD in comparison to open PD using 'Therapeutic Index' (TI). METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in various databases. Articles published between January 2010 and March 2021 reporting totally-robotic and open PD were included, according to the PRISMA and AMSTAR-2 guidelines. The Cochrane tool was used for risk of bias assessment. We compared 30-day mortality rates (MR30), lymphadenectomy rates (LR), R0 resection rates (R0RR) and therapeutic index (TI). STATA 16.1 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The four studies that met inclusion criteria included 5090 PDs, out of which 617 were totally-robotic (RPD) and 4473 were open (OPD). Variance ratio tests demonstrated a)Higher TI for RPD versus OPD (1807.42 vs 1723.37, p = 0.86), b)Significantly smaller MR30 (2.50 vs 19.00, p = 0.0004), c)Significantly lower R0RR (130.50 vs 939.25, p = 0.00) and d)No significant difference in LR between RPD and OPD (35.63 vs 38.25, p = 0.81). Meta-regression analysis showed a significantly higher TI coefficient of RPD than OPD (0.66 vs -0.40, p = 0.08, α = 0.1). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that robotic PD is safe and not inferior to open PD and our analysis RPD demonstrated a higher therapeutic index than OPD. Randomised controlled trials are required to establish the efficacy of robotic PD. Also, standardisation of reporting mortality, survival and oncological outcomes is needed for the effective calculation of TI.

Laparoscopic Enucleation of Pancreatic Neoplasms: A Single-Center Experience and Outcomes.

Background: Laparoscopic technique has been increasingly applied in the treatment of selected pancreatic tumors. The aim of this study is to evaluate the experience with laparoscopic enucleation of pancreatic neoplasms (LEPNs), for selected pancreatic diseases, at a high-volume referral center. Methods: Between May 2012 and October 2020, LEPNs was attempted in 16 patients with selected pancreatic neoplasms. The localization of tumors, etiology, indications, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results: Sixteen patients were included. LEPN was successfully performed in 13 patients, 3 conversions to open procedure were required. The definitive histopathological result of the resected pieces showed prevalence of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Postoperative major complications occurred for 3 patients (18.7%), the 3 of them presented postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). The median hospital stay was 4.5 days (range 2-7) for patients without POPF and 14.6 days (3-30) for those who presented with POPF. No deaths were registered. During a median follow-up of 43.8 months (0.2-109), no new-onset exocrine or endocrine insufficiency was diagnosed, no patient experienced tumor recurrence and, the 4 patients who underwent LEPN for insulinoma, remained asymptomatic. Conclusion: LEPNs has become a valuable alternative for patients with benign or low risk of malignancy tumors. Appropriate preoperative imaging is key for localization. Whenever feasible, this technique not only reduces the risks of exocrine and endocrine insufficiency, but also adds the well-known advantages of minimally invasive techniques, making it a safe and feasible treatment.

Retrospective observational study of patient outcomes with local wound infusion vs epidural analgesia after open hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery.

BACKGROUND: Epidural analgesia is conventionally used as the mainstay of analgesia in open abdominal surgery but has a small life-changing risk of complications (epidural abscesses or haematomas). Local wound-infusion could be a viable alternative and are associated with fewer adverse effects. METHODS: A retrospective observational analysis of individuals undergoing open hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery over 1 year was undertaken. Patients either received epidural analgesia (EP) or continuous wound infusion (WI) + IV patient controlled anaesthesisa (PCA) with an intraoperative spinal opiate. Outcomes analyzed included length of stay, commencement of oral diet and opioid use. RESULTS: Between Jan 2016- Dec 2016, 110 patients were analyzed (WI n=35, EP n=75). The median length of stay (days) was 8 in both the WI and EP group (p=0.846), the median time to commencing oral diet (days) was 3 in WI group and 2 in EP group (p=0.455). There was no significant difference in the amount of oromorph, codeine or tramadol (mg) between WI and EP groups (p=0.829, p=0.531, p=0.073, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous wound infusion + IV PCA provided adequate analgesia to patients undergoing open hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery. It was non-inferior to epidural analgesia with respect to hospital stay, commencement of oral diet and opioid use.

Indocyanine Green Fluorescence-Guided Surgery for Gastrointestinal Tumors: A Systematic Review.

Objective: To conduct a systematic review of the currently available literature on the use of ICG to guide surgical dissection in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer surgery. Background: Real-time indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence-guided surgery has the potential to enhance surgical outcomes by increasing patient-tailored oncological precision. Methods: MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched for publications on the use of ICG as a contrast agent in GI cancer surgery until December 2020. Perfusion studies were excluded. Quality of the studies was assessed with the Methodological Index for nonrandomized Studies or Jadad scale for randomized controlled trials. A narrative synthesis of the results was provided, with descriptive statistics when appropriate. Results: Seventy-eight studies were included. ICG was used for primary tumor and metastases localization, for sentinel lymph node detection, and for lymph flow mapping. The detection rate for primary colorectal and gastric tumors was 100% after preoperative ICG endoscopic injection. For liver lesions, the detection rate after intravenous ICG infusion was 80% and up to 100% for lesions less than 8 mm from the liver surface. The detection rate for sentinel lymph nodes was 89.8% for esophageal, 98.6% for gastric, 87.4% for colorectal, and 83.3% for anal tumors, respectively. In comparative studies, ICG significantly increases the quality of D2 lymphadenectomy in oncological gastrectomy. Conclusion: The use of ICG as a guiding tool for dissection in GI surgery is promising. Further evidence from high-quality studies on larger sample sizes is needed to assess whether ICG-guided surgery may become standard of care.

Proposed training pathway with initial experience to set up robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic service.

Although robot-assisted hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HPB) surgery has gained momentum over the last 2 decades, only a handful of units in the world perform major robotic resections. Adaptation of robotic surgery in the UK lags behind its European counterparts and this is mainly because of cost implications in a publicly funded National Health Service (NHS). We describe our experience of setting up a robotic HPB programme with clinical outcomes and propose a training pathway that would help prospective centres in setting up their own robotic HPB service with robust clinical governance oversight. After gaining colleagues' and departmental support, approval from the hospital clinical governance, finance department and new intervention procedure committee was sought. A team of two consultant surgeons, three assistants and three theatre staff went through a structured training programme sponsored mainly by the industry. Surgeon training consisted of online modules, simulation, wet lab, cadaveric training, case observations, proctored procedures followed by independent practice. All major cases were recorded and videos reviewed to improve performance. A total of 111 procedures were successfully completed with robotic assistance between April 2018 and March 2020. The programme started with robot-assisted cholecystectomy as index procedure and progressed on to more complex liver and pancreatic resections including major hepatectomy and Whipple's procedure. The training pathway followed by our team has been effective in setting up a safe robotic HPB programme and could be considered as a roadmap to start new Robotic HPB services.

Mastery skill assessment in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgical ultrasound: It's a Matter of Entrustment.

BACKGROUND: A formative hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) ultrasound (US) skills practicum is offered annually to graduating HPB fellows, using entrustment assessments for open (IOUS) and laparoscopic (LAPUS) US. It is hypothesized that validity evidence will support the use of these assessments to determine if graduating fellows are well prepared to perform HPB US independently. METHODS: Expert faculty were surveyed to set Mastery Entrustment standards for fellow performance. Standards were applied to fellow performances during two annual US skills practicums. RESULTS: 11 faculty questionnaires were included. Mean Entrustment cut scores across all items were 4.9/5.0 and 4.8/5.0 and Global Entrustment cut scores were 5.0/5.0 and 4.8/5.0 for IOUS and LAPUS, respectively. 78.5% (29/37) fellows agreed to have their de-identified data evaluated. Mean fellow Entrustments (across all skills) were 4.1 (SD 0.6; 2.6-4.9) and 3.9 (SD 0.7; 2.7-5), while the Global Entrustments were 3.6 (SD 0.8; 2-5) and 3.5 (SD 1.0; 2-5) for IOUS and LAPUS, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Two cohorts of graduating HPB fellows are not meeting Mastery Standards for HPB US performance determined by a panel of expert faculty.

Percutaneous Balloon Dilatation for Hepaticojejunostomy Stricture Following Paediatric Liver Transplantation: Long-Term Results of an Institutional "Three-Session" Protocol.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report the long-term results of an institutional protocol of percutaneous biliary balloon dilatation (PBBD) on paediatric patients with benign anastomotic stricture after liver transplantation. As a secondary objective, we evaluated risk factors associated with post-treatment re-stricture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen paediatric, post-liver transplant patients with benign anastomotic stricture of Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy were included. All patients underwent the same treatment protocol of three PBBD procedures with 15-day intervals. Clinical outcome was analysed using the Terblanche classification. Primary patency rate was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier test. RESULTS: All patients had an initial successful result (Terblanche grade, excellent/good) after PBBD. At the end of the follow-up time of 35.7 ± 21.1 months (CI95%, 23.5-47.9), 10 patients persisted with excellent/good grading, while the remaining 4 had re-stricture, all of the latter occurring within the first 19 months. Patency rate after percutaneous treatment at 1, 3, and 5 years were 85.7%, 70%, and 70%, respectively. History of major complication after liver transplantation was associated with 5 times higher risk of re-stricture, HR 5.48 [95% CI, 2.18-8.78], p = 0.018. CONCLUSION: In paediatric patients with benign anastomotic stricture of hepaticojejunostomy after liver transplantation, the "Three-session" percutaneous biliary balloon dilatation protocol is associated with a high rate of long-term success. In this limited series, the history of post-liver transplant major complication, defined as complications requiring a reintervention under general anaesthesia or advanced life support, seems to be an independent risk factor for stricture recurrence.