Cost-effectiveness analysis of health tapestry, a complex primary care program for older adults: a post-hoc analysis.

BACKGROUND: We initially reported on the cost-effectiveness of a 6-month randomized controlled implementation trial which evaluated Health TAPESTRY, a primary care program for older adults, at the McMaster Family Health Team (FHT) site and 5 other FHT sites in Ontario, Canada. While there were no statistically significant between-group differences in outcomes at month 6 post randomization, positive outcomes were observed at the McMaster FHT site, which recruited 40% (204/512) of the participants. The objective of this post-hoc study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of Health TAPESTRY based on data from the McMaster FHT site. METHODS: Costs included the cost to implement Health TAPESTRY at McMaster as well as healthcare resource consumed, which were costed using publicly available sources. Health-related-quality-of-life was evaluated with the EQ-5L-5L at baseline and at month 6 post randomization. Quality-adjusted-life-years (QALYs) were calculated under an-area-under the curve approach. Unadjusted and adjusted regression analyses (two independent regression analyses on costs and QALYs, seemingly unrelated regression [SUR], net benefit regression) as well as difference-in-difference and propensity score matching (PSM) methods, were used to deal with the non-randomized nature of the trial. Sampling uncertainty inherent to the trial data was estimated using non-parametric bootstrapping. The return on investment (ROI) associated with Health TAPESTRY was calculated. All costs were reported in 2021 Canadian dollars. RESULTS: With an intervention cost of $293/patient, Health TAPESTRY was the preferred strategy in the unadjusted and adjusted analyses. The results of our bootstrap analyses indicated that Health TAPESTRY was cost-effective compared to usual care at commonly accepted WTP thresholds. For example, if decision makers were willing to pay $50,000 per QALY gained, the probability of Health TAPESTRY to be cost effective compared to usual care varied from 0.72 (unadjusted analysis) to 0.96 (SUR) when using a WTP of $50,000/QALY gained. The DID and ROI analyses indicated that Health Tapestry generated a positive ROI. CONCLUSION: Health TAPESTRY was the preferred strategy when implemented at the McMaster FHT. We caution care in interpreting the results because of the post-hoc nature of the analyses and limited sample size based on one site.

Health TAPESTRY: Exploring the Potential of a Nursing Student Placement Within a Primary Care Intervention for Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

The increasing prevalence of chronic diseases in aging places demands on primary care. Nurses are the major nonphysician primary care workforce. Baccalaureate nursing programs should expose students to primary care and older adults to support these demands and help recruit new graduates to this setting. However, many baccalaureate nursing programs focus on acute care and placements aimed at older adults are viewed negatively. To address these curriculum challenges, third-year Canadian baccalaureate nursing students were placed in an innovative primary care program-Health TAPESTRY-for community-dwelling older adults. Health TAPESTRY involves an interprofessional primary care team, trained lay volunteers conducting home visits, system navigation, and an online software application. The goal of this study was to explore third-year baccalaureate nursing students' perceptions of this unique clinical primary care placement. This qualitative descriptive study explored students' perceptions of this placement's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats (SWOT), and outcomes. Nursing students participated in focus groups (n = 14) or an interview (n = 1) and five completed narrative summaries following visits. Qualitative content analysis was supported by NVivo 10. Strengths of the clinical placement included training for the intervention; new insights about older adults; and experience with home visiting, interprofessional team functions, and community resources. Weaknesses included limited exposure to older adult clients, lack of role clarity, lack of registered nurse role models, and technology challenges. Opportunities included more exposure to primary care, interprofessional teams, and community resources. No threats were described. Nursing students' clinical experiences can be enhanced through engagement in innovative primary care programs. Adequate exposure to clients, including older adults; interprofessional teams; mentoring by registered nurses or advanced practice nurse preceptors; and role clarity for students in the primary care team should be considered in supporting baccalaureate nursing students in primary care clinical placements.