Long versus short-term opioid therapy for fibromyalgia syndrome and risk of depression, sleep disorders and suicidal ideation: a population-based, propensity-weighted cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is characterised by widespread pain and is associated with mood disorders such as depression as well as poor sleep quality. These in turn have been linked to increased risk of suicidal ideation. Clinical guidelines generally do not recommended opioids in FMS, but they are routinely prescribed to a considerable proportion of FMS patients. We assessed the association of long-term opioid prescription for FMS with risk of depression, sleep disorders and suicidal ideation, when compared with short-term opioid use. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study combing several population-wide databases covering a population of five million inhabitants, including all adults who received an initial opioid prescription from 2014 to 2018 specifically prescribed for FMS. We examined the occurrence of depression, sleep disorders or suicidal ideation outcomes in patients with an initial long-term opioid prescription (>90 days) versus those who received a short-term treatment (<29 days). We employed multivariable Cox regression modelling and inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity scores and we performed several sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: 10 334 patients initiated short-term (8309, 80.40%) or long-term (2025, 19.60%) opioids for FMS. In main adjusted analyses, long-term opioid use was associated with an increased risk for depression (HR: 1.58, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.95) and sleep disorder (HR: 1.30, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.55) but not with suicidal ideation (HR: 1.59, 95% CI 0.96 to 2.62). In models assessing outcomes since day 90, an increased risk for suicidal ideation was observed (HR: 1.76, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.98). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that continued opioid use for 90 days or more may aggravate depression and sleep problems in patients with FMS when compared with patterns of short-term treatment.

Human resources for health: a framework synthesis to put health workers at the centre of healthcare.

BACKGROUND: Human resources are a key determinant for the quality of healthcare and health outcomes. Several human resource management approaches or practices have been proposed and implemented to better understand and address health workers' challenges with mixed results particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The aim of this framework synthesis was to review the human resources frameworks commonly available to address human resources for health issues in LMIC. METHODS: We searched studies in Medline, Embase, CAB Global Health, CINAHL (EBSCO) and WHO global Index Medicus up to 2021. We included studies that provided frameworks to tackle human resources for health issues, especially for LMICs. We synthesised the findings using a framework and thematic synthesis methods. RESULTS: The search identified 8574 studies, out of which 17 were included in our analysis. The common elements of different frameworks are (in descending order of frequency): (1) functional roles of health workers; (2) health workforce performance outcomes; (3) human resource management practises and levers; (4) health system outcomes; (5) contextual/cross-cutting issues; (6) population health outcomes and (7) the humanness of health workers. All frameworks directly or indirectly considered themes around the functional roles of health workers and on the outcomes of health workforce activities, while themes concerning the humanness of health workers were least represented. We propose a synthesised Human-Centred Health Workforce Framework. CONCLUSIONS: Several frameworks exist providing different recurring thematic areas for addressing human resources for health issues in LMIC. Frameworks have predominantly functional or instrumental dimensions and much less consideration of the humanness of health workers. The paradigms used in policy making, development and funding may compromise the effectiveness of strategies to address human resources challenges in LMIC. We propose a comprehensive human resources for health framework to address these pitfalls.

Clinical information on imaging referrals for suspected or known axial spondyloarthritis: recommendations from the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS).

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to establish expert consensus recommendations for clinical information on imaging requests in suspected/known axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), focusing on enhancing diagnostic clarity and patient care through guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A specialised task force was formed, comprising 7 radiologists, 11 rheumatologists from the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) and a patient representative. Using the Delphi method, two rounds of surveys were conducted among ASAS members. These surveys aimed to identify critical elements for imaging referrals and to refine these elements for practical application. The task force deliberated on the survey outcomes and proposed a set of recommendations, which were then presented to the ASAS community for a decisive vote. RESULTS: The collaborative effort resulted in a set of six detailed recommendations for clinicians involved in requesting imaging for patients with suspected or known axSpA. These recommendations cover crucial areas, including clinical features indicative of axSpA, clinical features, mechanical factors, past imaging data, potential contraindications for specific imaging modalities or contrast media and detailed reasons for the examination, including differential diagnoses. Garnering support from 73% of voting ASAS members, these recommendations represent a consensus on optimising imaging request protocols in axSpA. CONCLUSION: The ASAS recommendations offer comprehensive guidance for rheumatologists in requesting imaging for axSpA, aiming to standardise requesting practices. By improving the precision and relevance of imaging requests, these guidelines should enhance the clinical impact of radiology reports, facilitate accurate diagnosis and consequently improve the management of patients with axSpA.

Identifying serious underlying diagnoses among patients with brief resolved unexplained events (BRUEs): a Canadian cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the demographics and clinical outcomes of infants with brief resolved unexplained events (BRUE). DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: 11 centres within the Canadian Paediatric Inpatient Research Network. PATIENTS: Patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) following a BRUE (2017-2021) were eligible, when no clinical cause identified after a thorough history and physical examination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Serious underlying diagnosis (requiring prompt identification) and event recurrence (within 90 days). RESULTS: Of 1042 eligible patients, 665 were hospitalised (63.8%), with a median stay of 1.73 days. Diagnostic tests were performed on 855 patients (82.1%), and 440 (42.2%) received specialist consultations. In total, 977 patients (93.8%) were categorised as higher risk BRUE per the American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines. Most patients (n=551, 52.9%) lacked an explanatory diagnosis; however, serious underlying diagnoses were identified in 7.6% (n=79). Epilepsy/infantile spasms were the most common serious underlying diagnoses (2.0%, n=21). Gastro-oesophageal reflux was the most common non-serious underlying diagnosis identified in 268 otherwise healthy and thriving infants (25.7%). No instances of invasive bacterial infections, arrhythmias or metabolic disorders were found. Recurrent events were observed in 113 patients (10.8%) during the index visit, and 65 patients had a return to ED visit related to a recurrent event (6.2%). One death occurred within 90 days. CONCLUSIONS: There is a low risk for a serious underlying diagnosis, where the majority of patients remain without a clear explanation. This study provides evidence-based risk for adverse outcomes, critical information to be used when engaging in shared decision-making with caregivers.

Increasing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the Health and Health Services Research Workforce: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Health and health services research institutions seek to increase diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) to overcome structural bias. The objective of this review is to identify, characterize, and evaluate programs aimed to strengthen DEI in the health and health services research workforces. We conducted a systematic scoping review of literature of 2012-2022 North American peer-reviewed empirical studies in PubMed and Embase using the Arksey and O'Malley approach. This review identified 62 programs that varied in focus, characteristics, and outcomes. Programs focused on supporting a spectrum of underrepresented groups based on race/ethnicity, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability status, and socioeconomic status. The majority of programs targeted faculty/investigators, compared to other workforce roles. Most programs were 1 year in length or less. The practices employed within programs included skills building, mentoring, and facilitating the development of social networks. To support program infrastructure, key strategies included supportive leadership, inclusive climate, resource allocation, and community engagement. Most programs evaluated success based on shorter-term metrics such as the number of grants submitted and manuscripts published. Relatively few programs collected long-term outcomes on workforce pathway outcomes including hiring, promotion, and retention. This systematic scoping review outlined prevalent practices to advance DEI in the health and health services research field. As DEI programs proliferate, more work is needed by research universities, institutes, and funders to realign institutional culture and structures, expand resources, advance measurement, and increase opportunities for underrepresented groups at every career stage.

Information exchange, responsibilities and expectation management in interhospital transfers: a qualitative study of hospital medicine physicians and advanced practice providers.

INTRODUCTION: The transfer of patients between hospitals, known as interhospital transfer (IHT), is associated with higher rates of mortality, longer lengths of stay and greater resource utilisation compared with admissions from the emergency department. To characterise the IHT process and identify key barriers and facilitators to IHT care, we examined the experiences of physician and advanced practice provider (APP) hospital medicine clinicians who care for IHT patients transferred to their facility. METHODS: Qualitative descriptive study using semistructured interviews with adult medicine hospitalists from an academic acute care hospital that accepts approximately 4000 IHT patients annually. A combined inductive and deductive coding approach guided thematic analysis. RESULTS: We interviewed 30 hospitalists with a mean of 5.7 years of experience. Two-thirds of interviewees were physicians and one-third were APPs.They described IHTs as challenging when (1) exchanged information was incomplete, inaccurate, extraneous, and/or untimely, (2) uncertainty impacted care responsibilities and (3) healthcare team members and patients had differing care expectations. As a result, participants described patient safety issues such as delays in care and inappropriate triage of patients due to incomplete communication of clinical status changes.Recommended improvement strategies include (1) dedicated individuals performing IHT tasks to improve consistency of information exchanged and relationships with transferring clinicians, (2) standardised scripts and documentation, (3) bidirectional communication, (4) interdisciplinary training and (5) shared understanding of care needs and expectations. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians and APP hospital medicine clinicians at an accepting hospital found information exchange, care responsibilities and expectation management challenging in IHT. In turn, hospitalists perceived a negative impact on IHT patient care and safety. Highly reliable and timely information transfer, standardisation of IHT processes and clear interdisciplinary communication may facilitate improved care for IHT patients.

Evaluating Perceptions of Head and Neck Surgeons on the Role of Single-Entry Models in Managing Surgical Waitlists in Ontario: A Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Long surgical wait times have long plagued health systems in Canada and abroad. This backlog and associated strain on health human resources has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, affecting surgeries of varying degrees of urgency across all surgical specialties, including head and neck surgery. Single-entry models (SEMs) are being increasingly studied as one possible strategy to help manage surgical wait times, and a growing number of health systems have implemented SEMs within departments such as otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. We sought to evaluate the views of head and neck surgeons at all 8 designated head and neck cancer centers across Ontario on the role of SEMs in managing surgical backlogs. RESULTS: We interviewed 10 Ontario head and neck surgeons on the role of SEMs in managing wait times within the field. The following themes were elicited from interview transcripts: (1) anticipated positive impact, (2) barriers to implementation, (3) patient experience, and (4) roadmap to implementation. Participants agreed that SEMs may have utility for certain types of surgeries if implemented to address local needs. They also believe this model would have the greatest impact if employed together with other approaches, such as increasing operating room time or nursing availability. CONCLUSION: Our results highlighted the necessity for a nuanced approach to single-entry model implementation in head and neck surgery. While participants recognized the utility of SEMs for high-volume and low-variation surgeries, participants remained divided on the optimal approach to triaging patients necessitating more complex oncologic treatments. Deliberate collaboration among stakeholder organizations and senior surgeons will be critical if SEMs are to succeed in an intricate and political healthcare environment.

Ideal Postdischarge Follow-Up After Severe Pneumonia or Acute Respiratory Failure: A Qualitative Study of Primary Care Clinicians in Diverse Settings.

BACKGROUND: Most patients discharged after hospitalization for severe pneumonia or acute respiratory failure receive follow-up care from primary care clinicians, yet guidelines are sparse. RESEARCH QUESTION: What do primary care clinicians consider to be ideal follow-up care after hospitalization for severe pneumonia or acute respiratory failure and what do they perceive to be barriers and facilitators to providing ideal follow-up? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted, via videoconferencing, semistructured interviews of 20 primary care clinicians working in diverse settings from five US states and Washington, DC. Participants described postdischarge visits, ongoing follow-up, and referrals for patients recovering from hospitalizations for pneumonia or respiratory failure bad enough to be hospitalized and to require significant oxygen support or seeking treatment at the ICU. Barriers and facilitators were probed using the capability, opportunity, motivation, behavior framework. Interview summaries and rigorous and accelerated data reduction analysis techniques were used. RESULTS: Core elements of primary care follow-up after severe pneumonia or acute respiratory failure included safety assessment, medication management, medical specialty follow-up, integrating the hospitalization into the primary care relationship, assessing mental and physical well-being, rehabilitation follow-up, and social context of recovery. Clinicians described specific practices as well as barriers and facilitators at multiple levels to optimal care. INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that at least seven core elements are common in follow-up care after severe pneumonia or acute respiratory failure, and conventional systems include barriers and facilitators to delivering what primary care clinicians consider to be optimal follow-up care. Future research could leverage identified barriers and facilitators to develop implementation tools that enhance the delivery of robust follow-up care for severe pneumonia or acute respiratory failure.

Organizational Characteristics of Hospitals Meeting STRIDE Program Adoption Benchmarks to Support Mobility for Hospitalized Persons.

There are few validated contextual measures predicting adoption of evidence-based programs. Variation in context at clinical sites can hamper dissemination. We examined organizational characteristics of Veterans Affairs hospitals implementing STRIDE, a hospital walking program, and characteristics' influences on program adoption. Using a parallel mixed-method design, we describe context and organizational characteristics by program adoption. Organizational characteristics included: organizational resilience, implementation climate, organizational readiness to implement change, highest complexity sites versus others, material support, adjusted length of stay (LOS) above versus below national median, and improvement experience. We collected intake forms at hospital launch and qualitative interviews with staff members at 4 hospitals that met the initial adoption benchmark, defined as completing supervised walks with 5+ unique hospitalized Veterans during months 5 to 6 after launch with low touch implementation support. We identified that 31% (n = 11 of 35) of hospitals met adoption benchmarks. Seven percent of highest complexity hospitals adopted compared to 48% with lower complexity. Forty-three percent that received resources adopted compared to 29% without resources. Thirty-six percent of hospitals with above-median LOS adopted compared to 23% with below-median. Thirty-five percent with at least some implementation experience adopted compared to 0% with very little to no experience. Adopters reported higher organizational resilience than non-adopters (mean = 23.5 [SD = 2.6] vs 22.7 [SD = 2.6]). Adopting hospitals reported greater organizational readiness to change than those that did not (mean = 4.2 [SD = 0.5] vs 3.8 [SD = 0.6]). Qualitatively, all sites reported that staff were committed to implementing STRIDE. Participants reported additional barriers to adoption including challenges with staffing and delays associated with hiring staff. Adopters reported that having adequate staff facilitated implementation. Implementation climate did not have an association with meeting STRIDE program adoption benchmarks in this study. Contextual factors which may be simple to assess, such as resource availability, may influence adoption of new programs without intensive implementation support.

Research exposure in UK paediatric training: how do we address the gaps-experience from the London REACH network.

Trainee-led Research Networks (TRNs) can mitigate against the lack of in-training academic opportunities by offering research experience, support and shared learning for paediatricians. The London Research, Evaluation and Audit for Child Health (REACH) Network, founded in 2021, has grown to involve a diverse group of 190 volunteer members at 28 London hospitals. Planning and delivery of a range of multisite projects bring not only many challenges but also a wealth of learning opportunities relating to research and quality improvement as well as leadership, management, education and fostering an accessible and equitable research culture. TRNs are an effective and valuable tool in improving the experience of trainees.

Care pathways for reduced fetal movements: A cost-consequence analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the costs and consequences of a new midwife-navigator-facilitated care pathway for reduced fetal movements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted at a tertiary obstetric centre in Queensland, Australia and modelling occurred for this and smaller services. Two months of data from pre (n = 112 in 2019) and post (n = 141 in 2020) implementation of the care pathway were analysed with T-tests and logistic regression models to evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes. A Markov model was built to estimate the costs and consequences of the intervention. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to test various scenarios including modelling for smaller centres. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in clinical outcome between the intervention and usual care groups. Intervention patients spent one hour and eight minutes less time in hospital (P < 0.001). This resulted in a saving to the centre of AU$135 per patient (AU$159 083 annually). One-way sensitivity analysis suggested that cost savings would be found in all scenarios except for smaller units providing services for less than 1900 births per annum. CONCLUSION(S): To our knowledge, no other care pathway involving acute obstetric care has been economically evaluated to date. Our model based on real-world presentations for reduced fetal movements confirms that midwife-navigators may be an economically beneficial implementation strategy for dealing with common obstetric conditions.

Characteristics of positive feedback provided by UK health service users: content analysis of examples from two databases.

BACKGROUND: Most feedback received by health services is positive. Our systematic scoping review mapped all available empirical evidence for how positive patient feedback creates healthcare change. Most included papers did not provide specific details on positive feedback characteristics. OBJECTIVES: Describe positive feedback characteristics by (1) developing heuristics for identifying positive feedback; (2) sharing annotated feedback examples; (3) describing their positive content. METHODS: 200 items were selected from two contrasting databases: (1) https://careopinion.org.uk/; (2) National Health Service (NHS) Friends and Family Test data collected by an NHS trust. Preliminary heuristics and positive feedback categories were developed from a small convenience sample, and iteratively refined. RESULTS: Categories were identified: positive-only; mixed; narrative; factual; grateful. We propose a typology describing tone (positive-only, mixed), form (factual, narrative) and intent (grateful). Separating positive and negative elements in mixed feedback was sometimes impossible due to ambiguity. Narrative feedback often described the cumulative impact of interactions with healthcare providers, healthcare professionals, influential individuals and community organisations. Grateful feedback was targeted at individual staff or entire units, but the target was sometimes ambiguous. CONCLUSION: People commissioning feedback collection systems should consider mechanisms to maximise utility by limiting ambiguity. Since being enabled to provide narrative feedback can allow contributors to make contextualised statements about what worked for them and why, then there may be trade-offs to negotiate between limiting ambiguity, and encouraging rich narratives. Groups tasked with using feedback should plan the human resources needed for careful inspection, and consider providing narrative analysis training.

Scoping review of the effectiveness of 10 high-impact initiatives (HIIs) for recovering urgent and emergency care services.

INTRODUCTION: Prolonged ambulance response times and unacceptable emergency department (ED) wait times are significant challenges in urgent and emergency care systems associated with patient harm. This scoping review aimed to evaluate the evidence base for 10 urgent and emergency care high-impact initiatives identified by the National Health Service (NHS) England. METHODS: A two-stage approach was employed. First, a comprehensive search for reviews (2018-2023) was conducted across PubMed, Epistemonikos and Google Scholar. Additionally, full-text searches using Google Scholar were performed for studies related to the key outcomes. In the absence of sufficient review-level evidence, relevant available primary research studies were identified through targeted MEDLINE and HMIC searches. Relevant reviews and studies were mapped to the 10 high-impact initiatives. Reviewers worked in pairs or singly to identify studies, extract, tabulate and summarise data. RESULTS: The search yielded 20 771 citations, with 48 reviews meeting the inclusion criteria across 10 sections. In the absence of substantive review-level evidence for the key outcomes, primary research studies were also sought for seven of the 10 initiatives. Evidence for interventions improving ambulance response times was generally scarce. ED wait times were commonly studied using ED length of stay, with some evidence that same day emergency care, acute frailty units, care transfer hubs and some in-patient flow interventions might reduce direct and indirect measures of wait times. Proximal evidence existed for initiatives such as urgent community response, virtual hospitals/hospital at home and inpatient flow interventions (involving flow coordinators), which did not typically evaluate the NHS England outcomes of interest. CONCLUSIONS: Effective interventions were often only identifiable as components within the NHS England 10 high-impact initiative groupings. The evidence base remains limited, with substantial heterogeneity in urgent and emergency care initiatives, metrics and reporting across different studies and settings. Future research should focus on well-defined interventions while remaining sensitive to local context.

Triage Accuracy and the Safety of User-Initiated Symptom Assessment With an Electronic Symptom Checker in a Real-Life Setting: Instrument Validation Study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have evaluated the accuracy of the diagnostics of electronic symptom checkers (ESCs) and triage using clinical case vignettes. National Omaolo digital services (Omaolo) in Finland consist of an ESC for various symptoms. Omaolo is a medical device with a Conformité Européenne marking (risk class: IIa), based on Duodecim Clinical Decision Support, EBMEDS. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates how well triage performed by the ESC nurse triage within the chief symptom list available in Omaolo (anal region symptoms, cough, diarrhea, discharge from the eye or watery or reddish eye, headache, heartburn, knee symptom or injury, lower back pain or injury, oral health, painful or blocked ear, respiratory tract infection, sexually transmitted disease, shoulder pain or stiffness or injury, sore throat or throat symptom, and urinary tract infection). In addition, the accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and safety of the Omaolo ESC were assessed. METHODS: This is a clinical validation study in a real-life setting performed at multiple primary health care (PHC) centers across Finland. The included units were of the walk-in model of primary care, where no previous phone call or contact was required. Upon arriving at the PHC center, users (patients) answered the ESC questions and received a triage recommendation; a nurse then assessed their triage. Findings on 877 patients were analyzed by matching the ESC recommendations with triage by the triage nurse. RESULTS: Safe assessments by the ESC accounted for 97.6% (856/877; 95% CI 95.6%-98.0%) of all assessments made. The mean of the exact match for all symptom assessments was 53.7% (471/877; 95% CI 49.2%-55.9%). The mean value of the exact match or overly conservative but suitable for all (ESC's assessment was 1 triage level higher than the nurse's triage) symptom assessments was 66.6% (584/877; 95% CI 63.4%-69.7%). When the nurse concluded that urgent treatment was needed, the ESC's exactly matched accuracy was 70.9% (244/344; 95% CI 65.8%-75.7%). Sensitivity for the Omaolo ESC was 62.6% and specificity of 69.2%. A total of 21 critical assessments were identified for further analysis: there was no indication of compromised patient safety. CONCLUSIONS: The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the safety and to explore the accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of the Omaolo ESC. The results indicate that the ESC is safe in a real-life setting when appraised with assessments conducted by triage nurses. Furthermore, the Omaolo ESC exhibits the potential to guide patients to appropriate triage destinations effectively, helping them to receive timely and suitable care. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/41423.

GP working time and supply, and patient demand in England in 2015-2022: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: English primary care faces a reduction in GP supply and increased demand. AIM: To explore trends in GP working time and supply, accounting for factors influencing demand for services. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective observational study in English primary care between 2015 and 2022. METHOD: Trends in median GP contracted time commitment were calculated using annual workforce datasets. Three measures of demand were calculated at practice-level: numbers of patients; numbers of older patients (≥65 years); and numbers of chronic conditions using 21 Quality and Outcomes Framework disease registers. Multi-level Poisson models were used to assess associations between GP supply and practice demand, adjusted for deprivation, region, and year. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2022, the median full-time equivalent (FTE) of a fully qualified GP decreased from 0.80 to 0.69. There was a 9% increase in registered population per GP FTE (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05 to 1.14). This increase was steeper using numbers of chronic conditions (32%, IRR = 1.32; 95% CI = 1.26 to 1.38). Practices in the most deprived decile had 17% more patients (IRR = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.27) and 19% more chronic conditions (IRR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.33) per GP FTE, compared with the least deprived decile. These disparities persisted over time. All regions reported more chronic conditions per GP FTE than London. CONCLUSION: Population demand per GP has increased, particularly in terms of chronic conditions. This increase is driven by several factors, including a reduction in GP contracted time commitments. Persistent deprivation gradients in GP supply highlight the need to recruit and retain GPs more equitably.

Role of mixed healthcare providers networks in strengthening primary care systems: a case study of a rural primary care site.

INTRODUCTION: Service delivery networks, also called healthcare providers networks (HCPNs) have been used to address health inequities and promote universal healthcare (UHC). This study described the effect of instituting a mixed HCPN (partnership of public health facilities with a private pharmacy) on the provision of medications in the rural primary care pilot site of the Philippine Primary Care Studies (PPCS). METHODS: This is a case study of the mixed HCPN in the PPCS rural site. A mixed HCPN involving one private pharmacy was instituted to increase the supply of drugs. The total number of medications prescribed per month from April 2019 to October 2021, and the number of medications dispensed from the public sector (rural health unit or RHU) and from the partner private pharmacy in the same time period were obtained. RESULTS: Of the 101 031 medications prescribed in the first year (April 2019 to March 2020), 21.7% were dispensed at the RHU and 66.7% were dispensed in the partner private pharmacy. The remaining 11.5% were unrendered or dispensed in other private pharmacies. Of the 35 408 medications prescribed in the second year (April 2020 to March 2021), 5.6% were dispensed at the RHU and 32.2% were dispensed at the partner private pharmacy. Majority (62.1%) were unrendered or dispensed in other private pharmacies. From April to October 2021, of the 6448 medications prescribed, 2.3% were dispensed at the RHU, and 47.3% were dispensed at the partner private pharmacy. Majority (50.3%) were unrendered or dispensed in other private pharmacies. CONCLUSION: Creation of a mixed HCPN in a rural primary care site augmented access to essential medications. The mixed HCPN model in the study showed potential in strengthening access to consultations and medications in a rural community. Improving essential primary care services can facilitate implementation of UHC in the Philippines.

Appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in paediatrics: retrospective controlled study assessing a multifaceted intervention in Northern Italy in a 7-year period.

BACKGROUND: Academic detailing, audit and feedback, and peer comparison have been advocated as effective ways to promote appropriateness of prescribing and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). This study explored the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention aimed at supporting the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in paediatrics. METHODS: Over the course of 7 years, all 89 paediatricians of the Local Health Authority (LHA) of Reggio Emilia (530 000 residents) were provided with scientific literature focused on antimicrobial resistance and the appropriateness of use of specific antibiotics, together with local data on antimicrobial resistance and prescribing reports comparing each paediatrician with colleagues in the same district and with local averages. Prescribing rates of specific target antibiotics/classes of antibiotics were evaluated by comparing Reggio-Emilia with the other seven LHAs of the Emilia-Romagna Region (control area), adjusting for prescriptions during a 2-year baseline period. RESULTS: A significant increase in the rate of amoxicillin prescriptions (91 more per 1000 children/year) was observed in the intervention area compared with the control area along with a significant reduction in the rate of amoxicillin+clavulanate prescriptions (70 fewer per 1000 children/year) and a significant increase in the ratio of their prescription rates. No differences were observed in cephalosporin and macrolide prescription rates and overall antibiotic prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in prescribing appropriateness were observed. This study confirms the importance of an audit and feedback approach through small group meetings supported by scientific literature, local resistance data and prescribing reports. Such approach should always be considered as part of multifaceted interventions to promote AMS.

Transition from rectal to intranasal route among mostly pediatric patients with repeated prescriptions of rescue benzodiazepines for seizure emergencies.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the changes in Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved non-intravenous rescue benzodiazepine (non-IV-rBZD) use and cost after the introduction of intranasal midazolam and intranasal diazepam. METHODS: Retrospective descriptive study using the MarketScan Database between the years 2016 and 2022. We considered patients who had at least one non-IV-rBZD prescription before the introduction of intranasal rescue medications and at least one non-IV-rBZD prescription after the introduction of intranasal rescue medications. RESULTS: There were 4,444 patients (45.8 % female, median (p25-p75) age of 10.0 (5.0-15.0) years). 2,255 of 4,444 (50.7 %) patients switched from rectal diazepam to either intranasal midazolam (1,110 (25.0 %)) or intranasal diazepam (1,145 (25.8 %)) as their last non-IV-rBZD. The change from rectal to intranasal non-IV-rBZDs has been increasing over the years from 2019 to 2022. On multivariable analysis, having a non-IV-rBZD for epilepsy (rather than for other reasons including febrile seizures), the year of the last rescue medication, urban (non-rural) patient's residence, and certain regions of the United States were the factors most strongly associated with a change from rectal diazepam to intranasal non-IV-rBZDs. After adjusting for inflation, the median (p25-p75) average wholesale price (AWP) of the last non-IV-rBZD was higher than that of the first non-IV-rBZD [702 (406-748) versus 417 (406-426), Wilcoxon signed rank test p < 0.0001)]. This difference was mainly driven by the patients who changed from rectal diazepam to intranasal non-IV-rBZD [748 (714-755) versus 417 (406-426), Wilcoxon signed rank test p < 0.0001)]. After adjusting for inflation, the median (p25-p75) patient cost of the last non-IV-rBZD was higher than that of the first non-IV-rBZD [16 (3-55) versus 12 (6-31), Wilcoxon signed rank test p < 0.0001)]. This difference was mainly driven by the patients who changed from rectal diazepam to intranasal non-IV-rBZD [41 (6-83) versus 12 (6-30), Wilcoxon signed rank test p < 0.0001)]. CONCLUSION: Approximately half of patients changed from rectal diazepam to intranasal midazolam or intranasal diazepam and that transition has been progressively increasing from the year 2019 to the year 2022. The inflation-adjusted AWP and patient cost increased, especially among those patients who changed from rectal to intranasal rescue medication.