RESUMEN
Objetivo: analisar o desenvolvimento da enfermagem traumato-ortopédica a partir da primeira turma de residentes de um hospital especializado. Método: o estudo seguiu a metodologia histórica com abordagem qualitativa. As fontes foram documentos escritos e orais. Resultados: trabalhar em uma instituição especializada foi o ponto de partida para a busca por especialização de enfermeiras atuantes no cuidado traumato-ortopédico, que perceberam o saber/poder adquirido no trabalho assistencial, além da intenção de qualificar a assistência e elevar o hospital a instituto. Estratégias empregadas reúnem a busca por parcerias com instituições universitárias e associativas, além da criação de uma associação própria. Considerações finais: a enfermagem traumato-ortopédica ampliou seu espaço científico ao criar um curso de especialização com uma unidade acadêmica. Foi possível delimitar o poder acadêmico e institucional da enfermagem na instituição de saúde pela formação de enfermeiras especialistas constituindo um grupo de reconhecido pelo saber científico.
Objective: to analyze the development of trauma and orthopedic nursing care from the very first class of residents of a specialized hospital. Method: historical methodology study with a qualitative approach. The sources consisted of written and oral documents. Results: working in a specialized institution was the starting point for nurses who were seeking specialization in the field of trauma and orthopedic care as they noticed the power-knowledge acquired through care work, plus they were willing to improve assistance and take the hospital up to an institute level. Strategies used include the search for partnerships with universities and associative-type institutions, in addition to creating their own association. Final considerations: trauma and orthopedic nursing care expanded its scientific space by creating a specialization course together with an academic unit. It was possible to define the academic and institutional power of the nursing staff in the health institution by considering the training process of its nurse specialists, who consisted of a group recognized for their scientific knowledge.
Objetivo: analizar el desarrollo de la enfermería traumatológica ortopédica a partir del primer grupo de residentes de un hospital especializado. Método: estudio con metodología histórica con un enfoque cualitativo. Las fuentes fueron documentos escritos y orales. Resultados: el trabajo en una institución especializada fue el punto de partida para la búsqueda de la especialización de las enfermeras que trabajaban en la atención traumatológica ortopédica, quienes notaron el saber/poder adquirido en el trabajo asistencial, además de la intención de cualificar la atención y elevar el hospital al nivel de instituto. Las estrategias empleadas incluyen la búsqueda de alianzas con instituciones universitarias y asociaciones, y la creación de una asociación propia. Consideraciones finales: la enfermería traumatológica ortopédica amplió su espacio científico mediante la creación de un curso de especialización con una unidad académica. Se logró delimitar el poder académico e institucional de la enfermería en la institución de salud a través de la formación de enfermeros especialistas, que es un grupo reconocido por el conocimiento científico.
RESUMEN
Healthcare quality in low- and middle-income countries poses a significant challenge, contributing to heightened mortality rates from treatable conditions. The accreditation of health facilities was part of the former health reform in Mexico, proposed as a mechanism to enhance healthcare quality. This study assesses the performance of hospital accreditation in Mexico, utilizing indicators of effectiveness, efficiency, and safety. Employing a longitudinal approach with controlled interrupted time series analysis (C-ITSA) and fixed effects panel analysis, administrative data from general hospitals in Mexico is scrutinized. Results reveal that hospital accreditation in Mexico fails to enhance healthcare quality and, disconcertingly, indicates deteriorating performance associated with increased hospital mortality. Amidst underfunded health services, the implemented accreditation model proves inadequately designed to uplift care quality. A fundamental redesign of the public hospital accreditation model is imperative, emphasizing incentives for structural enhancement and standardized processes. Addressing the critical challenge of improving care quality is urgent for Mexico's healthcare system, necessitating swift action to achieve effective access as a benchmark for universal healthcare coverage.
Asunto(s)
Acreditación , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , México , Acreditación/normas , Humanos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Hospitales/normas , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Estudios LongitudinalesRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The Commission on Cancer (CoC) establishes standards to support multidisciplinary, comprehensive cancer care. CoC-accredited cancer programs diagnose and/or treat 73% of patients in the United States. However, rural patients may experience diminished access to CoC-accredited cancer programs. Our study evaluated distance to hospitals by CoC accreditation status, rurality, and Census Division. METHODS: All US hospitals were identified from public-use Homeland Infrastructure Foundation-Level Data, then merged with CoC-accreditation data. Rural-Urban Continuum Codes (RUCC) were used to categorize counties as metro (RUCC 1-3), large rural (RUCC 4-6), or small rural (RUCC 7-9). Distance from each county centroid to the nearest CoC and non-CoC hospital was calculated using the Great Circle Distance method in ArcGIS. FINDINGS: Of 1,382 CoC-accredited hospitals, 89% were in metro counties. Small rural counties contained a total of 30 CoC and 794 non-CoC hospitals. CoC hospitals were located 4.0, 10.1, and 11.5 times farther away than non-CoC hospitals for residents of metro, large rural, and small rural counties, respectively, while the average distance to non-CoC hospitals was similar across groups (9.4-13.6 miles). Distance to CoC-accredited facilities was greatest west of the Mississippi River, in particular the Mountain Division (99.2 miles). CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar proximity to non-CoC hospitals across groups, CoC hospitals are located farther from large and small rural counties than metro counties, suggesting rural patients have diminished access to multidisciplinary, comprehensive cancer care afforded by CoC-accredited hospitals. Addressing distance-based access barriers to high-quality, comprehensive cancer treatment in rural US communities will require a multisectoral approach.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The implementation of hospital accreditation standards in healthcare systems in Yemen that ensure safe and high-quality healthcare services is hampered by specific challenges. Therefore, this study was purposed to explore the challenges and strategies for applying hospital accreditation standards among healthcare professionals in Yemen. METHODS: A qualitative, phenomenological design was adopted to conduct this study. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data during the period from January 1, 2022, to February 28, 2022. RESULTS: Based on the content analysis, the study outcomes and lack of (i) funding, (ii) competent human resources, (iii) optimal infrastructure, and (iv) equipment and supplies deter the implementation of hospital accreditation standards. Also, this study highlighted the cultural and social barriers limiting the effectiveness of hospital accreditation standards, the need for increased investment in healthcare infrastructure and human resources, and cultural sensitivity training for healthcare professionals to enhance the implementation of and compliance with hospital accreditation standards. CONCLUSIONS: Policymakers should engage global corporations and development partners for technical assistance and capacity building that support the local application of hospital accreditation standards.
RESUMEN
Hospital accreditation has become ubiquitous in developing countries. While research acknowledges that accreditation can enhance healthcare quality, efficiency, and safety, concerns persist regarding hospitals' management of conflicts stemming from the diverse institutional logic inherent in this process. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate how professional and market logic, alongside conflicts arising from institutional demands, affect compliance with hospital accreditation. To this end, we conducted a multiple-case study in four Brazilian hospitals employing in-depth interviews and on-site observations. The triangulation of narrative analysis and the outcomes of multiple correspondence analysis revealed that when professional logic predominates, there is a greater propensity to tailor accredited activities by segmenting the tasks between physicians and nurses with the intention of mitigating existing conflicts. Conversely, when conflicts occur over established goals between professionals and orientated marked logic executives, the accreditation process is impeded, resulting in non-compliance. Ultimately, the findings underscore the alignment between the pursuit of legitimacy and efficiency within the accreditation process. We conclude by delineating the theoretical and practical implications of scrutinizing the internal dynamics of institutional logic.
RESUMEN
This paper aims to review the healthcare system in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and the utilisation of international accreditation to improve the quality of healthcare services and to grow its medical tourism industry. Medical tourism has contributed to the UAE's economy. Hence, the country mandated international accreditation in public and private facilities to attract patients and boost medical tourism. Accreditation is recognised worldwide as one of the main drivers for implementing quality and patient safety standards, which has sparked considerable interest in studying the effects and outcomes of such assessments. Therefore, the second aim of this paper is to review the UAE's strategic goals to improve the quality of healthcare services using international accreditation. Although striving to achieve global accreditation attracts tourists, it is essential to understand the needs and outcomes of such assessments. This review showed how the UAE healthcare sector has evolved to improve the quality of its healthcare services through accreditation. While enhancing the quality of such services and increasing the medical tourism industry provided many opportunities for expatriates to move to the UAE, the country should aim to strengthen its medical services by expanding to other Middle Eastern countries. This paper could influence policymakers implementing international accreditation in the UAE and the Middle Eastern region.
RESUMEN
RESUMO Objetivo: compreender as perspectivas de lideranças sobre a retomada ao processo de Acreditação Hospitalar no contexto da "pós-pandemia" da COVID-19. Método: estudo de caso, qualitativo, desenvolvido em um hospital universitário de grande porte de Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil. A coleta de dados ocorreu com 10 lideranças estratégicas de agosto a setembro de 2022 por meio de uma entrevista semiestruturada. Empregou-se a Análise de Conteúdo Temática. Resultados: emergiram três categorias, a saber: "Mudanças e estratégias do hospital demandadas pela pandemia da COVID-19"; "Desafios da gestão da qualidade e segurança do paciente advindas do contexto pandêmico"; e, "Gerenciamento da retomada do processo de Acreditação Hospitalar pós-pandemia". Conclusão: a crise sanitária da COVID-19 impôs entraves para os processos antes bem sedimentados. As lideranças reconheceram a exaustão das equipes e trabalharam no sentido de motivar as pessoas e a capilarizar as informações necessárias ao êxito da recertificação de qualidade.
ABSTRACT Objective: To understand leaders' perspectives on the resumption of the Hospital Accreditation process in the context of the "post-pandemic" of COVID-19. Method: A qualitative case study was carried out in a large university hospital in Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil. Data was collected from 10 strategic leaders from August to September 2022 through a semi-structured interview. Thematic Content Analysis was used. Results: Three categories emerged: "Hospital changes and strategies demanded by the COVID-19 pandemic"; "Quality management and patient safety challenges arising from the pandemic context"; and, "Managing the resumption of the post-pandemic Hospital Accreditation process". Conclusion: The COVID-19 health crisis has imposed obstacles on previously well-established processes. The leadership recognized the exhaustion of the teams and worked to motivate people and spread the information necessary for the success of the quality recertification.
RESUMEN Objetivo: Conocer las perspectivas de los líderes sobre la reanudación del proceso de Acreditación Hospitalaria en el contexto de la "post-pandemia" de COVID-19. Método: estudio de caso cualitativo realizado en un gran hospital universitario de Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil. Se recogieron datos de 10 líderes estratégicos entre agosto y septiembre de 2022 mediante una entrevista semiestructurada. Se utilizó el análisis de contenido temático. Resultados: urgieron tres categorías: "Cambios y estrategias hospitalarias exigidos por la pandemia COVID-19"; "Gestión de la calidad y retos para la seguridad del paciente derivados del contexto pandémico"; y, "Gestión de la reanudación del proceso de Acreditación Hospitalaria pospandémica". Conclusión: La crisis sanitaria COVID-19 ha impuesto obstáculos a procesos previamente bien establecidos. La dirección reconoció el agotamiento de los equipos y trabajó para motivar a la gente y difundir la información necesaria para el éxito de la recertificación de la calidad.
RESUMEN
Resumo Objetivo Compreender os desafios enfrentados pela educação permanente para o alcance da melhoria da qualidade e da segurança do paciente em um hospital público submetido à acreditação hospitalar. Métodos Estudo descritivo, transversal e com abordagem qualitativa. Realizaram-se entrevistas semiestruturadas com 22 profissionais, durando, em média, 22 minutos, as quais posteriormente foram analisadas e interpretadas por meio da análise de conteúdo temática de Bardin. Adotaram-se os softwares Iramuteq para a análise de corpus textual, e o BioEstat 5.3, para análise do perfil dos participantes. A coleta de dados ocorreu em junho de 2022, após aprovação nos Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa. Resultados Aplicou-se a análise de classificação hierárquica descendente, gerada pelo Iramuteq. Obtiveram-se três categorias: Desafios da Educação Permanente mediante o Processo de Melhoria Contínua; Educação Permanente para a Promoção da Qualidade e da Segurança do Paciente no Contexto da Acreditação Hospitalar; e Estratégias Educativas para a Melhoria da Qualidade e da Segurança do Paciente. Conclusão Identificaram-se desafios inerentes às ações de educação permanente em saúde, tais como resistência à mudança de cultura, adesão às atividades, alta rotatividade de profissionais e dificuldade para liberação da equipe de enfermagem para participar das atividades relacionadas à demanda de trabalho.
Resumen Objetivo Comprender los desafíos enfrentados por la educación permanente para lograr mejorar la calidad y la seguridad del paciente en un hospital público sometido a acreditación hospitalaria. Métodos Estudio descriptivo, transversal y con enfoque cualitativo. Se realizaron entrevistas semiestructuradas a 22 profesionales, con duración promedio de 22 minutos, que luego se analizaron e interpretaron mediante el análisis de contenido temático de Bardin. Se utilizaron los softwares Iramuteq para el análisis de corpus textual y BioEstat 5.3 para el análisis del perfil de los participantes. La recopilación de datos se llevó a cabo en junio de 2022, después de la aprobación de los Comités de Ética en Investigación. Resultados Se aplicó el análisis de clasificación jerárquica descendente, generado por Iramuteq. Se obtuvieron tres categorías: Desafíos de la educación permanente mediante el proceso de mejora continua, Educación permanente para la promoción de la calidad y de la seguridad del paciente en el contexto de la acreditación hospitalaria, y Estrategias educativas para la mejora de la calidad y la seguridad del paciente. Conclusión Se identificaron desafíos inherentes a las acciones de educación permanente en salud, tales como resistencia a cambios de cultura, adherencia a las actividades, alta rotación de profesionales y dificultad de autorizar al equipo de enfermería para participar en las actividades relacionadas con la demanda de trabajo.
Abstract Objective To understand the challenges faced in terms of permanent education in health, for achieving quality improvements and patient safety at a public hospital undergoing hospital accreditation. Methods This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study with a qualitative approach. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 professionals, lasting an average of 22 minutes. The interviews were subsequently analyzed and interpreted using Bardin's thematic content analysis. The software Iramuteq was used to analyze the textual corpus, and BioEstat 5.3 was used to analyze the profile of the participants. The data collection took place in June 2022, following approval by the Research Ethics Committees. Results The descending hierarchical classification analysis, generated by Iramuteq, was applied, resulting in three categories: Challenges of Permanent Education through the Continuous Improvement Process, Permanent Education for the Promotion of Quality and Patient Safety in the Context of Hospital Accreditation, and Educational Strategies for Improving Quality and Patient Safety. Conclusion Challenges inherent to the actions of permanent education in health were identified, such as resistance to cultural change, adherence to activities, high turnover of professionals, and difficulty in releasing the nursing team to participate in activities, due to work demand.
RESUMEN
Background. It is a patient's right to be included in decisions about their health care. Implementing shared decision making (SDM) is important to enable active communication between clinicians and patients. Although health policy makers are increasingly mandating SDM implementation, SDM adoption has been slow. This study explored stakeholders' organizational- and system-level barriers and facilitators to implementing policy mandated SDM in maternity care in Victoria, Australia. Method. Twenty-four semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants including clinicians, health service administrators and decision makers, and government policy makers. Data were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify barriers and facilitators to SDM implementation. Results. Factors identified as facilitating SDM implementation included using a whole-of-system approach, providing additional implementation resources, correct documentation facilitated by electronic medical records, and including patient outcomes in measurement. Barriers included health service lack of capacity, unclear policy definitions of SDM, and policy makers' lack of resources to track implementation. Conclusion. This is the first study to our knowledge to explore barriers and facilitators to SDM implementation from the perspective of multiple actors following policy mandating SDM in tertiary health services in Australia. The primary finding was that there are concerns that SDM implementation policy is outpacing practice. Nonclinical staff play a crucial role translating policy to practice. Addressing organizational- and system-level barriers and facilitators to SDM implementation should be a key concern of health policy makers, health services, and staff. Highlights: New government policies require shared decision making (SDM) implementation in hospitals.There is limited evidence for how to implement SDM in hospital settings.There are concerns SDM implementation policy is outpacing practice.Understanding and capacity for SDM varies considerably among stakeholders.Whole of system approaches and electronic medical records are seen to facilitate SDM.
RESUMEN
Introducción: La innovación en la atención de la salud es una fuerza impulsora en la búsqueda de un equilibrio entre la limitación de costos y la calidad de la atención médica y, en la actualidad, emerge como paradigma la innovación integral que no descuida ninguna de sus dimensiones y se desarrolla en sus distintos niveles: de país, de institución y de las personas que la llevan a vías de hecho. Objetivo: Estudiar la trayectoria de innovación que, con un enfoque integral, ha llevado al Centro Nacional de Cirugía de Mínimo Acceso a convertirse en obligada referencia cuando se habla de instituciones hospitalarias con un alto nivel de calidad del servicio que se presta, en pro de la salud pública del país. Posicionamiento: La innovación integral, que combina la introducción de tecnologías médicas con innovaciones organizacionales en sistemas de gestión, permite alcanzar resultados importantes en la calidad de la atención médica y la formación de profesionales competentes en procederes terapéuticos y quirúrgicos mínimamente invasivos. Conclusiones: El análisis realizado permitió definir cuatro etapas en la trayectoria de innovación del Centro Nacional de Cirugía de Mínimo Acceso: Núcleo (1980-1992), Fundación (1993-2005), Consolidación (2006-2015), Acreditación y Certificación (2016-2022). Se caracterizan los elementos esenciales de cada etapa hasta llegar a la actual, en la que se logra que los resultados de la innovación organizacional y en tecnologías médicas del centro sean reconocidos en diferentes instancias y contribuyan a brindar servicios de salud de alta calidad.
Introduction: Innovation in health care is a driving force in the search for a balance between cost limitation and quality of medical care; today comprehensive innovation that does not neglect any of its dimensions, emerging as a paradigm. It is developed at its different levels: country, institution and the people who take it to reality. Objective: To study the trail of innovation that, with a comprehensive approach, has led the National Center for Minimum Access Surgery to become an unavoidable reference when talking about hospital institutions with a high level of quality of service, in favor of the public health of the country. Positioning: Comprehensive innovation, which combines the introduction of medical technologies with organizational innovations in management systems, allows achieving important results in the quality of medical care and the training of competent professionals in minimally invasive therapeutic and surgical procedures. Conclusions: The analysis carried out allowed us to define four stages in the innovation trajectory of the National Center for Minimum Access Surgery: Nucleus (1980-1992), Foundation (1993-2005), Consolidation (2006-2015), Accreditation and Certification (2016- 2022). The essential elements of each stage are characterized up to reaching the current one, in which the results of this institution's organizational innovation and medical technologies are recognized at different instances, and they contribute to providing high-quality health services.
RESUMEN
Background: Healthcare organizations worldwide tend to implement hospital accreditation programs to improve the quality of care they provide. However, the literature shows inconsistent findings on the impact of such programs on the quality of care due to improper implementation of accreditation programs. Purpose: This study explored the enabling factors for the effective implementation of the Saudi Central Board for Accreditation of Healthcare Institutions (CBAHI) program in the Ministry of Health (MOH) hospitals in Madinah, Saudi Arabia. Methods: This qualitative study involved 22 professionals from five CBAHI-accredited MOH hospitals in Madinah, Saudi Arabia. A purposive sampling technique was applied, and data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews. A thematic analysis approach was applied to the interview transcripts. Results: Four themes and 11 subthemes emerged. The emerging themes included the development of human capital, resolving quality management issues, ensuring the availability of resources, and strategizing CBAHI-specific solutions. Conclusion: The current study fills this knowledge gap by identifying the factors leading to the effective implementation of the CBAHI accreditation program in the MOH hospitals. Only the effective execution of the CBAHI will increase healthcare quality and, as a result, justify the significant resources and efforts invested in these programs. Future research should replicate similar study in other governments or private hospitals.
RESUMEN
Background: Although hospital accreditation is recognized as a tool for improving healthcare, there are inconsistent results regarding its impact on healthcare quality. In Saudi Arabia, it is mandatory for all Ministry of Health (MOH) hospitals to be accredited by the Central Board for Accreditation of Healthcare Institutions (CBAHI). Purpose: This study measured the impact of the CBAHI accreditation program on the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) safety dimension in Madinah. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using retrospective data gathered from a review of hospital records over 60 months (ie, 12 months before, 36 during, and 12 post-accreditation). The data were analyzed using piecewise (segmented) regression analysis. Results: The three indicators (ie: incident reports, medication errors, and nosocomial infection) were continuously improved compared to the data before accreditation, as a results of implementing the CBAHI accreditation program. Therefore, the CBAHI had a significantly positively impacts on MOH hospitals' safety dimension. Conclusion: Complying with the CBAHI standards can help reduce the rates of incident reports, medication errors, nosocomial infections, and post-admission mortality. This study provides insight for MOH hospitals and opportunities to expand the accreditation program to improve the quality of healthcare services.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) has been shown to improve healthcare outcomes and is a recognized right of patients. Policy requires health services to implement SDM. However, there is limited research into what interventions work and for what reasons. The aim of the study was to develop a series of interventions to increase the use of SDM in maternity care with stakeholders. METHODS: Interventions to increase the use of SDM in the setting of pregnancy care were developed using Behaviour Change Wheel and Theoretical Domains Framework and building on findings of an in-depth qualitative study which were inductively analysed. Intervention development workshops involved co-design, with patients, clinicians, health service administrators and decision-makers, and government policy makers. Workshops focused on identifying viable SDM opportunities and tailoring interventions to the local context (the Royal Women's Hospital) and salient qualitative themes. RESULTS: Pain management options during labour were identified by participants as a high priority for application of SDM, and three interventions were developed including patient and clinician access to the Victorian Government's maternity record via the patient portal and electronic medical records (EMR); a multi-layered persuasive communications campaign designed; and clinical champions and SDM simulation training. Factors identified by participants for successful implementation included having alignment with strategic direction of the service, support of leaders, using pre-standing resources and workflows, using clinical champions, and ensuring equity. CONCLUSION: Three interventions co-designed to increase the use of SDM for pain management during labour address key barriers and facilitators to SDM in maternity care. This study exemplifies how health services can use behavioural science and co-design principles to increase the use of SDM. Insights into the co-design of interventions to implement SDM in routine practice provide a framework for other health services, policy makers and researchers.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Materna , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Atención Prenatal , Personal Administrativo , Registros Electrónicos de SaludRESUMEN
Introducción: Un sistema de gestión de calidad brinda la estructura organizativa, los procesos, los procedimientos y las herramientas para implementar las actividades y alcanzar los objetivos requeridos. Es un proceso en el que participan directivos, operativos y administrativos. Todos deben reconocer y asumir su responsabilidad para el éxito de la implementación o mejoramiento del sistema y deben esforzarse para alcanzarlo. Objetivo: Exponer el proceso de implementación del sistema de gestión de calidad del Instituto de Hematología e Inmunología. Métodos: Se realizó una investigación descriptiva. Se realizaron encuestas, entrevistas y auditorías para mostrar el desarrollo del sistema de gestión de calidad del Instituto de Hematología e Inmunología. El período de estudió fue de 2017-2020 e incluyó 32 áreas del instituto. Resultados: Se crearon los documentos del sistema de gestión de calidad y el plan de gestión. Se capacitó al personal. Se definieron las políticas, el objetivo y la proyección estratégica de la calidad. Se elaboró y se puso en ejecución todo el sistema documental, con un total de más de 590 documentos. Las tareas derivadas del plan de gestión de la calidad se cumplieron en un 81,25 por ciento, esto permitió identificar las áreas de mejoras Conclusiones: La implementación del sistema de gestión de calidad es trascendental para elevar el buen desempeño de una organización de salud y constituye el motor impulsor para lograr la calidad merecida en todos los servicios asistenciales que brinda, lo cual demuestra su importancia para alcanzar los resultados que espera y necesita el sistema de salud cubano(AU)
Introduction: A quality management system provides the organizational structure, processes, procedures and tools to implement activities and achieve the required objectives. It is a process with the participation of management, operational and administrative personnel. All of them must recognize and assume their responsibility for the successful implementation or improvement of the system and must strive to achieve it. Objective: To describe the implementation process of the quality management system in the Institute of Hematology and Immunology. Methods: A descriptive research was carried out. Surveys, interviews and audits were conducted to show the development of the quality management system in Institute of Hematology and Immunology. The study period was 2017-2020 and included 32 institutional areas. Results: The corresponding documents were created for the quality management system and the management plan. The personnel received training. Quality policies, objective and strategic projection were defined. The entire document system was developed and implemented, with a total of more than 590 documents. The tasks derived from the quality management plan were completed at 81.25 percent, which allowed the identification of areas for improvement. Conclusions: The implementation of the quality management system is transcendental to raise the good performance of a health organization, as well as the driving force to achieve the deserved quality in all the care services provided by any institution, which shows its importance to achieve the outcomes expected and needed by the Cuban health system(AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Gestión de la Calidad Total/organización & administración , Acreditación de Hospitales , Epidemiología DescriptivaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In Taiwan, plasma use per capita ranks among the highest in the world. We aimed to describe the trends in usage after the introduction of new hospital accreditation standards that evaluate compliance with institutional plasma transfusion guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified hospitalizations receiving plasma between 2007 and 2017 from the national health insurance database. We estimated plasma transfusions per thousand capita. The risk ratio of transfusion rates among hospitalizations in 2017 compared to 2007 was estimated using logistic regression. RESULTS: The total number of plasma transfusions declined from 964,408 in 2007 to 659,828 in 2017, yielding a rate of 28.00 per thousand capita. The proportion of hospitalizations receiving plasma declined by 38%, from 3.89% (95% confidence interval: 3.86%-3.91%) to 2.62% (2.61%-2.64%). Gastroenterology (16.4%) and general surgery (15.3%) accounted for the largest proportions of plasma usage. Within these two services, liver diseases were the top diagnoses needing plasma use. For hospitalized patients with liver diseases, approximately 40% of plasma units were administered to patients with neither noticeable bleeding nor red blood cells transfusions. Among these patients, almost 50% received plasma with an international normalized ratio trigger of less than 1.50. The use of potential alternative therapies or anticoagulants remained quite low during this period. CONCLUSION: Plasma utilization rates during hospitalizations continuously declined over 11 years. However, inappropriate plasma use remained high, while the use of alternative therapies remained low in services such as gastroenterology. To improve the appropriateness of plasma transfusions, patient blood management should be implemented in the near future.
Asunto(s)
Transfusión de Componentes Sanguíneos , Plasma , Transfusión Sanguínea , Transfusión de Eritrocitos , Humanos , Taiwán/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Hospital accreditation has been studied comprehensively, yet few studies have observed its impacts on the burnout and work engagement levels of frontline healthcare professionals (HCPs). With a sample of 121 HCPs working in the United Arab Emirates' public hospitals, this study used a two-wave, cross-lagged panel design to examine the direct effects of job demands and job resources during hospital accreditations on burnout and work engagement and the moderating roles of psychosocial safety climate (PSC) on burnout and work engagement 3 months after accreditation. The data were analyzed using moderated structural equation modeling. As expected, we found that job demands (i.e., accreditation demands) had a direct effect on burnout, while job resources (i.e., social support) predicted work engagement. PSC moderated both relationships; however, it was not able to directly predict burnout or work engagement. Findings from this study show a positive relationship between accreditation demands and HCPs' health. Future research needs to examine the link between PSC and job demands-resources concepts before and after hospital accreditation more closely by using multiple time points to assess the causality relationships between predictor and outcome variables.
RESUMEN
ABSTRACT Objectives: to analyze and compare levels of stress and resilience in nurses before and after the assessment for maintenance of the Hospital Accreditation Certification. Methods: quantitative, observational, and longitudinal research, with 53 nurses from a philanthropic hospital, in the Rio Grande do Sul. Data collected in two stages, March, and July 2019, before the assessment visit and 60 days after, using the Bianchi Stress Scale and Resilience Scale. Descriptive and analytical statistics were employed. Results: the majority of participants showed an average stress level before and after the evaluation. The highest stress scores were related to Domains E (coordination of unit activities) and C (activities related to personnel administration). In both moments of the study, the participants had medium and high resilience. Conclusions: managing people, processes, and assistance are stressful activities in the Accreditation process and increase the nurses' stress levels.
RESUMEN Objetivos: analizar y comparar niveles de estrés y resiliencia de enfermeros antes y después de evaluación para manutención de Certificación de Acreditación de Hospitales. Métodos: investigación cuantitativa, observacional y longitudinal, con 53 enfermeros de hospital filantrópico, en Rio Grande del Sul. Datos recolectados en dos etapas, marzo y julio de 2019, antes de la invitación de evaluación y 60 días después. Utilizado Escala de Estrés Bianchi y Escala de Resiliencia. Empleado estadística descriptiva y analítica. Resultados: mayoría de los participantes presentaron nivel mediano de estrés antes y después de la evaluación. Mayores escores de estrés fueron referentes a Dominios E (coordinación de actividades de la unidad) y C (actividades relacionadas a administración de personal). En los dos momentos, los participantes encontraban con capacidad de resiliencia mediana y alta. Conclusiones: gerenciar personas, procesos y asistencia son actividades agotadoras en la Acreditación y elevan los niveles de estrés de los enfermeros.
RESUMO Objetivos: analisar e comparar níveis de estresse e resiliência de enfermeiros antes e depois da avaliação para manutenção da Certificação de Acreditação Hospitalar. Métodos: pesquisa quantitativa, observacional e longitudinal, com 53 enfermeiros de um hospital filantrópico, no estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Dados coletados em duas etapas, março e julho de 2019, antes da visita de avaliação e 60 dias depois. Utilizou-se Escala Bianchi de Stress e Escala de Resiliência. Empregouse estatística descritiva e analítica. Resultados: a maioria dos participantes apresentou nível médio de estresse antes e depois da avaliação. Maiores escores de estresse foram referentes aos Domínios E (coordenação das atividades da unidade) e C (atividades relacionadas à administração de pessoal). Nos dois momentos do estudo, os participantes encontravam-se com capacidade de resiliência média e alta. Conclusões: gerenciar pessoas, processos e assistência são atividades desgastantes no processo de Acreditação e elevam os níveis de estresse dos enfermeiros.
RESUMEN
Resumo: Introdução: Para a manutenção e sustentabilidade da Iniciativa Hospital Amigo da Criança, é imprescindível o monitoramento constante, pois assim é possível manter os padrões de qualidade desejados. Apesar dos esforços empreendidos pelos estabelecimentos habilitados como Amigo da Criança, ainda se faz necessária uma revisão das práticas adotadas. Objetivo Geral: Avaliar o processo de monitoramento segundo os critérios da Iniciativa no estado no Paraná do período de 2015 a 2019. Objetivos Específicos: Caracterizar os Hospitais Amigo da Criança no Paraná; Descrever o resultado consolidado da avaliação interna da Iniciativa no estado do Paraná, no período de 2015 a 2019; Analisar o cumprimento dos critérios da Iniciativa nas avaliações externas, realizadas no estado do Paraná, entre 2015 e 2019 e, Analisar a concordância entre os resultados da avaliação interna e 1ª avaliação externa, realizadas entre 2015 e 2019. Métodos: Trata-se de estudo de caso único, quantitativo, pautado no referencial metodológico de Yin. O estudo foi constituído por 21 Hospitais Amigo da Criança no Paraná. A coleta de evidências ocorreu em quatro etapas entre abril e maio de 2021. Na primeira caracterizou-se os hospitais, na segunda descreveu-se o resultado das avaliações internas, na terceira analisou-se o resultado das avaliações externas e, na quarta analisou-se a concordância entre os resultados da avaliação interna e externa. Utilizou-se como fonte de evidências documentos de gestão e sistemas web de domínio público e privado. Os dados coletados foram tabulados em formato Microsoft® Office Excel. A unidade de análise foi a Iniciativa e como subunidade os hospitais. Para análise das evidências utilizou-se a estratégia analítica de série temporal, e estatística descritiva com frequência simples e relativa. Resultado: Entre os estabelecimentos 76,2% são do tipo hospital geral, com 42,9% situados na 2ª Regional de Saúde, sendo que 57,1% tem habilitação antiga, atendendo ao risco habitual, intermediário e alto, atendimento exclusivo do sistema único de saúde, gestão dupla, sem atividade de ensino. Houve 105 avaliações internas, sendo o ano de 2015 com o melhor resultado de cumprimento dos critérios e 2017 como o pior. Dentre os hospitais sete obtiveram média abaixo de 80% de cumprimento, e cinco com 100%. Ressalta-se que apenas dois itens não atingiram 80%. Quanto às 43 avaliações externas, o ano de 2016 destacou-se com o melhor resultado e 2019 com o pior, dentre os hospitais tem-se nove com 100% de cumprimento, e dois com 0%. Em relação aos critérios, sete itens apresentaram porcentagem de cumprimento insatisfatório. Já nas 29 análises de concordância, tem-se o ano de 2016 com o melhor resultado e 2018 com o pior. Em relação aos critérios, três itens apresentaram menos de 50% de concordância, oito entre 50 e 70%, e dois acima de 90%. Conclusão: Esta iniciativa tem potencialidades para promover a inserção e a incorporação desta cultura na instituição. Seu fortalecimento traz impactos positivos na qualidade da assistência materno-infantil no estado, impulsionando a qualidade no nascimento, com repercussões em toda a vida do indivíduo e sua família, e subsidiando os profissionais no desenvolvimento de práticas sustentadas em evidências científicas robustas.
Abstract: Introduction: For the maintenance and sustainability of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative, constant monitoring is essential, as it is possible to maintain the desired quality standards. Despite the efforts made by the establishments qualified as Baby Friendly, a review of the adopted practices is still necessary. General Objective: To evaluate the monitoring process according to the criteria of the Initiative in the state of Paraná from 2015 to 2019. Specific Objectives: To characterize the Baby-Friendly Hospitals in Paraná; Describe the consolidated result of the internal evaluation of the Initiative in the state of Paraná, from 2015 to 2019; Analyze compliance with the Initiative's criteria in external evaluations, carried out in the state of Paraná, between 2015 and 2019 and, Analyze the agreement between the results of the internal evaluation and the 1st external evaluation, carried out between 2015 and 2019. Methods: This is a study single case, quantitative, based on Yin's methodological framework. The study consisted of 21 Baby-Friendly Hospitals in Paraná. Evidence collection took place in four stages between April and May 2021. In the first, the hospitals were characterized, in the second, the results of internal evaluations were described, in the third, the results of external evaluations were analyzed, and, in the fourth, they were analyzed. if the agreement between the results of the internal and external evaluation. Management documents and web systems in the public and private domain were used as a source of evidence. The collected data were tabulated in Microsoft® Office Excel format. The unit of analysis was the Initiative and the hospitals as a sub-unit. To analyze the evidence, the analytical strategy of time series was used, and descriptive statistics with simple and relative frequency. Result: Among the establishments, 76.2% are of the general hospital type, with 42.9% located in the 2nd Health Regional, and 57.1% have old licenses, given the usual, intermediate and high risk, exclusive service of the system single health care, dual management, no teaching activity. There were 105 internal assessments, with 2015 being the year with the best result in terms of meeting the criteria and 2017 being the worst. Among the hospitals, seven had an average below 80% of compliance, and five with 100%. It is noteworthy that only two items did not reach 80%. As for the 43 external evaluations, the year 2016 stood out with the best result and 2019 with the worst, among the hospitals there are nine with 100% compliance, and two with 0%. Regarding the criteria, seven items showed a percentage of unsatisfactory compliance. In the 29 concordance analyses, 2016 has the best result and 2018 has the worst. Regarding the criteria, three items showed less than 50% agreement, eight between 50 and 70%, and two above 90%. Conclusion: This initiative has the potential to promote the insertion and incorporation of this culture in the institution. Its strengthening brings positive impacts on the quality of maternal and child care in the state, boosting quality at birth, with repercussions throughout the life of the individual and their family, and subsidizing professionals in the development of practices supported by robust scientific evidence.
Asunto(s)
Lactancia Materna , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Salud Infantil , Acreditación de Hospitales , Política de Salud , HospitalesRESUMEN
PURPOSE: There is conflicting evidence concerning the impact of hospital accreditation programmes, including across the Middle East Region, where such programmes have been most recently implemented in Iran, Jordan and Saudi Arabia. This paper maps available evidence regarding the impact of hospital accreditation in these three countries and draws attention to knowledge gaps for consideration. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This scoping review was conducted in 2020, using the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Five research databases were searched, along with five government and accreditation agency websites. Searches were complemented by citation chaining. English and Arabic publications evaluating hospital accreditation in the selected countries were included. Commentaries and articles not based on primary data collection and reviews of existing registry data were excluded. There were no exclusions based on study design or methods. A descriptive numerical summary and thematic analysis were used to synthesise the literature. FINDINGS: studies were included. The majority (n = 35) were published since 2014 and conducted in Saudi Arabia (n = 16). Four themes emerged: organisational impacts, patient safety, quality of care, and patient satisfaction and experience. The literature generally highlights positive impacts of accreditation, but most studies were based solely on health professionals' subjective perceptions. "Organisational impacts" had the largest, and strongest body of supporting evidence, while "patient safety" had the least and most variable evidence. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Opportunities to strengthen the design and evaluation of hospital accreditation programmes in the selected countries are highlighted. Additional experimental, mixed-method research is recommended to strengthen the evidence base and inform practical enhancements to hospital accreditation programmes in the region.
Asunto(s)
Acreditación , Personal de Salud , Hospitales , Humanos , Medio Oriente , Seguridad del PacienteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It can be presumed that introducing accreditation standards and obtaining national accreditation by a hospital should translate into increased patient satisfaction. The aim was to analyze the impact of introducing accreditation standards on patient satisfaction in cardiology departments. METHODS: 1080 patients, who were hospitalized in four cardiological wards (W1-W4) between 2009-2015, were asked to complete a 22-item questionnaire that assessed the level of their satisfaction with their medical care. 58 questionnaires were excluded because of incomplete data. The hospital was accredited in 2013. RESULTS: In 3 of the 4 wards, a statistically higher total score (the patient was more satisfied) in the period after the accreditation (2013-2015) compared to the period before the accreditation (2009-2012) was as follows: W1 (80.37 ± 6.54 vs. 83.85 ± 5.9; p = 0.0004), W2 (79.95 ± 7.62 vs. 81.46 ± 8.2: p = 0.0376), W4: (78.84 ± 7.94 vs. 84.91 ± 5.57; p = 0.0376); in one ward, there was no statistical difference: W3 (80.11 ± 8.42 vs. 81.07 ± 8.15; p = 0.3284). A significant difference was found in the number of points for the total assessment that were collected for all of the analyzed departments throughout the entire period (2009-2015)-W1: p = 0.0032; W2: p = 0.0176; W3: p = 0.0313 and W4: p < 0.0001). The medium-term rate of the change of the total score decreased after the accreditation. CONCLUSION: Preparing a hospital for a national accreditation program brought significant benefits for patients in a long-term observation.