Seasonality of the incidence of bronchiolitis in infants — Brazil, 2016-2022: An interrupted time-series analysis / Sazonalidade da incidência de bronquiolite em lactentes — Brasil, 2016-2022: Uma análise de série temporal interrompida

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the seasonality of acute bronchiolitis in Brazil during the 2020-2022 season and compare it with the previous seasons. Methods: Data from the incidence of hospitalizations due to acute bronchiolitis in infants <1 year of age were obtained from the Department of Informatics of the Brazilian Public Health database for the period between 2016 and 2022. These data were also analyzed by macro-regions of Brazil (North, Northeast, Southeast, South, and Midwest). To describe seasonal and trend characteristics over time, we used the Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Averages Model. Results: Compared to the pre-COVID-19 period, the incidence of hospitalizations related to acute bronchiolitis decreased by 97% during non-pharmacological interventions (March 2020 - August 2021) but increased by 95% after non-pharmacological interventions relaxation (September 2021 - December 2022), resulting in a 16% overall increase. During the pre-COVID-19 period, hospitalizations for acute bronchiolitis followed a seasonal pattern, which was disrupted in 2020-2021 but recovered in 2022, with a peak occurring in May, approximately 4% higher than the pre-COVID-19 peak. Conclusions: This study underscores the significant influence of COVID-19 interventions on acute bronchiolitis hospitalizations in Brazil. The restoration of a seasonal pattern in 2022 highlights the interplay between public health measures and respiratory illness dynamics in young children.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar a sazonalidade da bronquiolite aguda no Brasil durante a temporada 2020-2022 e compará-la com a das temporadas anteriores. Métodos: Os dados de incidência de internações por bronquiolite aguda em lactentes <1 ano de idade foram obtidos do Departamento de Informática da base de dados da Saúde Pública Brasileira para o período entre 2016 e 2022. Esses dados também foram analisados por macrorregiões do Brasil (Norte, Nordeste, Sudeste, Sul e Centro-Oeste). Para descrever características sazonais e de tendência ao longo do tempo, utilizamos o Modelo de Médias Móveis Integradas Autorregressivas Sazonais. Resultados: Em comparação com o período pré-COVID-19, a incidência de hospitalizações relacionadas com bronquiolite aguda diminuiu 97% durante as intervenções não farmacológicas (março de 2020 - agosto de 2021), mas aumentou 95% após a flexibilização das intervenções não farmacológicas (setembro de 2021 - dezembro de 2022), resultando no aumento geral de 16%. Durante o período pré-COVID-19, as hospitalizações por bronquiolite aguda seguiram um padrão sazonal, que foi interrompido em 2020-2021, mas recuperaram-se em 2022, com um pico ocorrido em maio, aproximadamente 4% superior ao pico pré-COVID-19. Conclusões: Este estudo ressalta a influência significativa das intervenções contra a COVID-19 nas hospitalizações por bronquiolite aguda no Brasil. A restauração de um padrão sazonal em 2022 sublinha a interação entre as medidas de saúde pública e a dinâmica das doenças respiratórias em crianças pequenas.

Interrupções e distrações durante a preparação e administração de medicamentos de alto risco: Estudo transversal / Interruptions and distractions during the preparation and administration of high-risk medications: A cross-sectional study / Distracciones e interrupciones durante la preparación y administración de medicamentos de alto riesgo: Estudio transversal

Resumo Enquadramento: Estudos indicam que as interrupções contribuem para erros clínicos e falhas em procedimentos. Objetivo: Analisar as interrupções vivenciadas pelos enfermeiros durante a preparação e administração de medicamentos de alto risco. Metodologia: Foi realizado um estudo transversal numa unidade de cuidados intensivos e numa unidade de internamento. As interrupções vivenciadas pelos enfermeiros durante o processo de medicação foram observadas com a ajuda de duas checklists. A amostra foi selecionada por conveniência em abril e maio de 2019. Os dados quantitativos foram analisados através de estatística descritiva no programa IBM SPSS Statistics, versão 24.0, enquanto os dados qualitativos foram tratados por meio da análise de conteúdo. Resultados: Observaram-se 137 interrupções em 193 processos de medicação. A maioria das interrupções foi iniciada por outros membros da equipa de cuidados de saúde por meio de conversas. Estas interrupções foram maioritariamente prejudiciais e ocorreram durante a fase de preparação. A estratégia multitarefa foi utilizada para as gerir. Conclusão: As interrupções ocorridas durante o processo de medicação eram maioritariamente associadas com comunicações profissionais e sociais. A sua relevância diferiu consoante a fase do processo.

Abstract Background: Interruptions have been reported to contribute to clinical errors and procedural failures. Objective: To analyze the interruptions experienced by nurses during the preparation and administration of high-risk medications. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted in an intensive care and inpatient unit. The interruptions experienced by nurses during the medication process were observed through two checklists. The sample was selected by convenience in April-May 2019. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze quantitative data in IBM SPSS Statistics software, version 24.0, while content analysis was used to analyze qualitative data. Results: In 193 medication processes, there were 137 interruptions. Other members of the healthcare team initiated most interruptions through conversations. These interruptions were mostly negative and occurred during the preparation phase. The multitasking strategy was used to manage them. Conclusion: Interruptions during the medication process were primarily associated with professional and social communications. The impact of these interruptions varied depending on the phase of the process.

Resumen Marco contextual: Se ha reportado la participación de distracciones en errores clínicos y fallos de procedimiento. Objetivo: Analizar las distracciones del personal de enfermería durante la preparación y administración de fármacos de alto riesgo. Metodología: Estudio transversal desarrollado en una unidad de cuidados intensivos y una unidad de hospitalización. Se observaron distracciones del personal de enfermería durante el proceso de medicación a través de dos listas de control. La muestra fue seleccionada por conveniencia (abril-mayo 2019). Los datos cuantitativos se analizaron mediante estadística descriptiva (IBM SPSS Statistics, versión 24.0). Los datos cualitativos se analizaron mediante análisis de contenido. Resultados: Hubo 137 distracciones en 193 procesos de medicación. La mayoría de las distracciones fueron iniciadas por otros miembros del equipo sanitario a través de conversaciones. La mayoría se produjeron en la fase de preparación y fueron negativas y se gestionaron mediante la estrategia multitarea. Conclusión: Las distracciones durante el proceso de medicación se referían principalmente a las comunicaciones profesionales y sociales. La importancia de esas distracciones variaba en función de la fase del proceso.

A pilot study testing a new transition of care model from hospital to the community for Hispanic/Latino adults with diabetes to reduce emergency department visits and hospital re-admissions.

BACKGROUND: Hispanic/Latino populations have the second highest prevalence of diabetes (12.5%) among ethnic minority groups in the USA. They also have higher rates of uncontrolled diabetes and diabetes-related complications. Approximately 29% of diabetes care costs are attributed to inpatient hospital care. To reduce hospital length of stay and re-admission rates for diabetes, the American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends a "structured discharge plan tailored to the individual patient with diabetes." However, limited research exists on the feasibility and applicability of a transition of care model specifically tailored for the Hispanic/Latino population. METHODS: We conducted a 2-year pilot study to develop a practical, patient-centered, and culturally competent transition of care (TOC) model for Hispanic/Latino adults with diabetes discharged from the hospital to the community. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment rates, questionnaire completion rates, adherence to a 30-day post-discharge phone call, and resource needs and utilization for study implementation. Participant-centered outcomes included 30-day post-discharge emergency department (ED) visits, 30-day post-discharge unplanned re-admissions, follow-up visits within 2 weeks of discharge, and patient satisfaction with the TOC model. RESULTS: Twelve participants were enrolled over the study period, with weekly enrollment ranging from 0 to 4 participants. Participants' average age in years was 47 (± 11.6); the majority were male (85%), and 75% had type 2 diabetes. Recruitment involved the support of 4 bilingual staff. The estimated time to review the chart, approach participants, obtain informed consent, complete questionnaires, and provide discharge instructions was approximately 2.5 h. Of the 10 participants who completed the 30-day post-discharge phone call, none had ED visits or unplanned hospital re-admissions within 30 days post-discharge, and all had a follow-up with a medical provider within 2 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a patient-centered and culturally competent TOC model for Hispanic/Latino adults with diabetes discharged from the hospital to the community is feasible when considering key resources for success. These include a bilingual team with dedicated and funded time, alignment with existing discharge process and integration into the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) systems.

Treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs in Medicare patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a retrospective claims analysis (2015-2020).

AIMS: To understand treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and the economic burden of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in elderly adults in the US. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective database analysis utilized US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare fee-for-service administrative claims data from 2015 to 2020 to describe DLBCL patient characteristics, treatment patterns, HCRU, and costs among patients aged ≥66 years. Patients were indexed at DLBCL diagnosis and required to have continuous enrollment from 12 months pre-index until 3 months post-index. HCRU and costs (USD 2022) are reported as per-patient per-month (PPPM) estimates. RESULTS: A total of 11,893 patients received ≥1-line (L) therapy; 1,633 and 391 received ≥2 L and ≥3 L therapies, respectively. Median (Q1, Q3) age at 1 L, 2 L, and 3 L initiation, respectively, was 76 (71, 81), 77 (72, 82), and 77 (72, 82) years. The most common therapy was R-CHOP (70.9%) for 1 L and bendamustine ± rituximab for 2 L (18.7%) and 3 L (17.4%). CAR T was used by 14.8% of patients in 3 L. Overall, 39.6% (1 L), 42.1% (2 L), and 47.8% (3 L) of patients had all-cause hospitalizations. All-cause mean (median [Q1-Q3]) costs PPPM during each line were $22,060 ($20,121 [$16,676-$24,597]) in 1 L, $30,027 ($20,868 [$13,416-$31,016]) in 2 L, and $47,064 ($25,689 [$15,555-$44,149]) in 3 L, with increasing costs driven primarily by inpatient expenses. Total all-cause 3 L mean (median [Q1-Q3]) costs PPPM for patients with and without CAR T were $153,847 ($100,768 [$26,534-$253,630]) and $28,466 ($23,696 [$15,466-$39,107]), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: No clear standard of care exists in 3 L therapy for older adults with relapsed/refractory DLBCL. The economic burden of DLBCL intensifies with each progressing line of therapy, thus underscoring the need for additional therapeutic options.

Caregivers' experiences on preterm infants' management in a tertiary care facility in Ghana: a qualitative exploratory study.

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is a process that fundamentally alters parental or caregiver roles, particularly in the early weeks of childbirth. Caregiver experiences can be distressing due to struggles with an unfamiliar and potentially threatening environment of the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). These experiences can affect the development of parenting or caregiving roles to a greater extent. Supporting caregivers of preterm infants through education and information sharing can significantly improve neonatal outcomes. This study sought to explore the experiences of caregivers with hospitalized preterm infants regarding the education and information they received from healthcare workers on the care of preterm infants. METHOD: An exploratory descriptive qualitative study that explored caregivers' experiences with the management of preterm infants hospitalized at the Level III Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of a tertiary level facility with an annual delivery of almost 7500 and a bed capacity of 26. The study utilized a deductive approach and a purposive sampling technique to recruit 16 caregivers who participated in an in-depth interview using a piloted semi-structured interview guide. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis. FINDINGS: The study identified three major themes, which were (1) preterm infant feeding and keeping infants warm, (2) routine procedures and activities at the NICU, and (3) preparation towards homecare after discharge. Seven (7) sub-themes were generated. Caregivers were satisfied with the education and information they received on infant feeding and keeping the infant ward. They also had adequate education that prepared them for home care of the preterm infant. Caregivers did not receive timely information and education on the health status of their infants and the care processes of the NICU. They felt they were left out as they were not involved in decision-making. Regarding the care of the preterm infant. The inadequate flow of information and use of medical terminologies were a great source of worry and frustration for participants. The study showed that although the NICU staff were willing to offer health education to caregivers, information giving and education were not structured and hence did not address all the needs of the caregivers. CONCLUSION: Healthcare providers caring for preterm infants include caregiver education in their routine NICU activities and procedures. These processes start from the period of admission till discharge. Their education sessions primarily focus on breastfeeding, keeping the infant warm and adequate preparation of caregivers for preterm infant home care. This notwithstanding there are gaps in caregiver education and information on routine procedures in the NICU as well as information on the health needs of the infant. Participants are not fully involved in the decision-making processes and the use of medical terminologies compound caregivers' frustrations and anxieties. It is important to develop structured educational programs tailored to address the information needs faced by caregivers to ensure optimal health outcomes for their preterm infants.

Effectiveness of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines in preventing COVID-19-related hospitalization during the Omicron BF.7-predominant epidemic wave in Beijing, China: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: To estimate vaccine effectiveness(VE) against COVID-19-related hospitalization for inactivated vaccines during the Omicron BF.7-predominant epidemic wave in Beijing, China. METHODS: We recruited a cohort in Beijing on 17 and 18 December 2022, collected status of vaccination and COVID-19-related hospitalization since 1 November 2022 and prospectively followed until 9 January 2023. A Poisson regression model was used to estimate the VE. RESULTS: 16(1.15%) COVID-19-related hospitalizations were reported in 1391 unvaccinated participants; 7(0.25%) in 2765 participants with two doses, resulting in a VE of 70.89%(95% confidence interval[CI] 26.25 to 87.73); 32(0.27%) in 11,846 participants with three doses, with a VE of 65.25%(95% CI 32.24 to 81.83). The VE of three doses remained above 64% at 1 year or more since the last dose. Elderly people aged ≥ 60 years had the highest hospitalization incidence(0.66%), VE for two doses was 74.11%(95%CI: - 18.42 to 94.34) and VE for three doses was 80.98%(95%CI:52.83 to 92.33). We estimated that vaccination had averted 65,007(95%CI: 12,817 to 97,757) COVID-19-related hospitalizations among people aged ≥ 60 years during the BF.7-predominant period in Beijing. CONCLUSION: Inactivated COVID-19 vaccines were effective against COVID-19-related hospitalization, especially for the elderly population who have increased risk of severe disease owing to SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Impact of Long SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Infection on the Health Care Burden: Comparative Case-Control Study Between Omicron and Pre-Omicron Waves.

BACKGROUND: Following the initial acute phase of COVID-19, health care resource use has escalated among individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare new diagnoses of long COVID and the demand for health services in the general population after the Omicron wave with those observed during the pre-Omicron waves, using similar assessment protocols for both periods and to analyze the influence of vaccination. METHODS: This matched retrospective case-control study included patients of both sexes diagnosed with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction or antigen tests in the hospital microbiology laboratory during the pandemic period regardless of whether the patients were hospitalized. We included patients of all ages from 2 health care departments that cover 604,000 subjects. The population was stratified into 2 groups, youths (<18 years) and adults (≥18 years). Patients were followed-up for 6 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Previous vaccination, new diagnoses, and the use of health care resources were recorded. Patients were compared with controls selected using a prospective score matched for age, sex, and the Charlson index. RESULTS: A total of 41,577 patients with a history of prior COVID-19 infection were included, alongside an equivalent number of controls. This cohort encompassed 33,249 (80%) adults aged ≥18 years and 8328 (20%) youths aged <18 years. Our analysis identified 40 new diagnoses during the observation period. The incidence rate per 100 patients over a 6-month period was 27.2 for vaccinated and 25.1 for unvaccinated adults (P=.09), while among youths, the corresponding rates were 25.7 for vaccinated and 36.7 for unvaccinated individuals (P<.001). Overall, the incidence of new diagnoses was notably higher in patients compared to matched controls. Additionally, vaccinated patients exhibited a reduced incidence of new diagnoses, particularly among women (P<.001) and younger patients (P<.001) irrespective of the number of vaccine doses administered and the duration since the last dose. Furthermore, an increase in the use of health care resources was observed in both adult and youth groups, albeit with lower figures noted in vaccinated individuals. In the comparative analysis between the pre-Omicron and Omicron waves, the incidence of new diagnoses was higher in the former; however, distinct patterns of diagnosis were evident. Specifically, depressed mood (P=.03), anosmia (P=.003), hair loss (P<.001), dyspnea (<0.001), chest pain (P=.04), dysmenorrhea (P<.001), myalgia (P=.011), weakness (P<.001), and tachycardia (P=.015) were more common in the pre-Omicron period. Similarly, health care resource use, encompassing primary care, specialist, and emergency services, was more pronounced in the pre-Omicron wave. CONCLUSIONS: The rise in new diagnoses following SARS-CoV-2 infection warrants attention due to its potential implications for health systems, which may necessitate the allocation of supplementary resources. The absence of vaccination protection presents a challenge to the health care system.

Outcomes and Predictors of Inpatient Mortality for Marantic Endocarditis Complicating Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Contemporary Nationwide Study From the United States.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients are susceptible to marantic endocarditis (ME) due to a hypercoagulable state. The literature regarding the epidemiology and outcomes of ME in SLE patients is limited. All patients ≥18 years who had SLE with and without ME between 2007 and 2019 were identified from the National Inpatient Sample in the United States (US). Predictors of inpatient mortality for SLE patients with ME were analyzed. Between 2007 and 2019, there were 508,818 hospitalizations for SLE, of which 785 (0.2%) had ME. Of SLE patients with ME, 33 (4.2%) died while hospitalized over the study period. On multivariate analysis, female sex (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 95% confidence intervals: 24.72 (3.21, 190.27)), age <34 years (aOR: 6.81 (1.80, 25.79)), anemia (aOR: 3.41 (1.12, 10.40)), antiphospholipid syndrome (aOR: 13.50 (3.83, 47.64)), stroke complicating ME (aOR: 9.64 (3.24, 28.71)), and acute kidney injury (aOR: 3.74 (1.06, 13.20)) were all associated with increased inpatient mortality among SLE patients with ME (P < .05 for all). Between 2007 to 2019, ME occurred in 0.2% of SLE hospitalizations, with a 4.2% average inpatient mortality over the study period. Female sex, antiphospholipid syndrome, and stroke were most strongly associated with increased inpatient mortality.

Health Care Resource Use and Total Mortality After Hospital Admission for Severe COVID-19 Infections During the Initial Pandemic Wave in France: Descriptive Study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about post-hospital health care resource use (HRU) of patients admitted for severe COVID-19, specifically for the care of patients with postacute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS). OBJECTIVE: A list of HRU domains and items potentially related to PACS was defined, and potential PACS-related HRU (PPRH) was compared between the pre- and post-COVID-19 periods, to identify new outpatient care likely related to PACS. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted with the French National Health System claims data (SNDS). All patients hospitalized for COVID-19 between February 1, 2020, and June 30, 2020 were described and investigated for 6 months, using discharge date as index date. Patients who died during index stay or within 30 days after discharge were excluded. PPRH was assessed over the 5 months from day 31 after index date to end of follow-up, that is, for the post-COVID-19 period. For each patient, a pre-COVID-19 period was defined that covered the same calendar time in 2019, and pre-COVID-19 PPRH was assessed. Post- or pre- ratios (PP ratios) of the percentage of users were computed with their 95% CIs, and PP ratios>1.2 were considered as "major HRU change." RESULTS: The final study population included 68,822 patients (median age 64.8 years, 47% women, median follow-up duration 179.3 days). Altogether, 23% of the patients admitted due to severe COVID-19 died during the hospital stay or within the 6 months following discharge. A total of 8 HRU domains were selected to study PPRH: medical visits, technical procedures, dispensed medications, biological analyses, oxygen therapy, rehabilitation, rehospitalizations, and nurse visits. PPRs showed novel outpatient care in all domains and in most items, without specificity, with the highest ratios observed for the care of thoracic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Patients hospitalized for severe COVID-19 during the initial pandemic wave had high morbi-mortality. The analysis of HRU domains and items most likely to be related to PACS showed that new care was commonly initiated after discharge but with no specificity, potentially suggesting that any impact of PACS was part of the overall high HRU of this population after hospital discharge. These purely descriptive results need to be completed with methods for controlling for confusion bias through subgroup analyses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05073328; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05073328.

Factors associated with venous thromboembolism pharmacoprophylaxis initiation in hospitalized medical patients: the Medical Inpatients Thrombosis and Hemostasis study.

BACKGROUND: Although guidelines recommend risk assessment for hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (HA-VTE) to inform prophylaxis decisions, studies demonstrate inappropriate utilization of pharmacoprophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients. Predictors of pharmacoprophylaxis initiation in medical inpatients remain largely unknown. OBJECTIVES: To determine factors associated with HA-VTE pharmacoprophylaxis initiation in adults hospitalized on medical services. METHODS: We performed a cohort study using electronic health record data from adult patients hospitalized on medical services at 4 academic medical centers between 2016 and 2019. Main measures were candidate predictors of HA-VTE pharmacoprophylaxis initiation, including known HA-VTE risk factors, predicted HA-VTE risk, and bleeding diagnoses present on admission. RESULTS: Among 111 550 admissions not on intermediate or full-dose anticoagulation, 48 520 (43.5%) received HA-VTE pharmacoprophylaxis on the day of or the day after admission. After adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and study site, the strongest clinical predictors of HA-VTE pharmacoprophylaxis initiation were malnutrition and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thrombocytopenia and history of gastrointestinal bleeding were associated with decreased odds of HA-VTE pharmacoprophylaxis initiation. Patients in the highest 2 tertiles of predicted HA-VTE risk were less likely to receive HA-VTE pharmacoprophylaxis than patients in the lowest (first) tertile (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.81-0.86 for the second tertile; OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.98 for the third tertile). CONCLUSION: Among patients not already receiving anticoagulants, HA-VTE pharmacoprophylaxis initiation during the first 2 hospital days was lower in patients with a higher predicted HA-VTE risk and those with risk factors for bleeding. Reasons for not initiating pharmacoprophylaxis in those with a higher predicted HA-VTE risk could not be assessed.

Clinical outcomes of patients from older community hospitalized for heart failure in guideline-directed medical therapy era: Insights from the COMPASS-HF registry.

BACKGROUND: Despite strong recommendations in the latest guidelines for implementing guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) before discharge, there is a lack of data on the clinical characteristics and outcomes of older patients with heart failure (HF). Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with HF in a super-aging society during the GDMT era. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the COMPASS-HF study including 305 consecutive hospitalized patients, 177 with acute HF were identified through a medical record review. The mean age of the enrolled patients was 86.2 years, and 46.3 % were men. The mean simple GDMT score, which is recognized as a useful prognostic tool for Japanese patients with HF, was 5.0. The incidences of all-cause death and HF hospitalization were 46.5 % and 19.4 %, respectively. The incidences of all-cause death and cardiovascular death were significantly lower in the high simple GDMT score group (≥5 points) than in the low simple GDMT score group (≤4 points) (p = 0.049 and p = 0.044, respectively). However, no significant differences were noted in HF hospitalization and composite events (cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization) between the groups (p = 0.564 and p = 0.086, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: While GDMT was well-implemented in the older community, the mortality rate among hospitalized patients with HF remained high. Although GDMT appears to have reduced the HF hospitalization rate, further validation and development of an optimal predictive model for elderly patients with HF are essential. X (FORMERLY TWITTER): In the older community, although the short- and long-term mortality of hospitalized patients with HF is still high even in the GDMT era, the HF hospitalization rate is suppressed, probably due to GDMT. A simple GDMT score may also be useful for stratifying the prognosis of older patients with HF. #HeartFailure#Mortality#GDMT#Fantastic4.

Admission characteristics of patients with short term hospitalization.

BACKGROUND: Sheba Medical Center (SMC) is the largest hospital in Israel and has been coping with a steady increase in total Emergency Department (ED) visits. Over 140,000 patients arrive at the SMC's ED every year. Of those, 19% are admitted to the medical wards. Some are very short hospitalizations (one night or less). This puts a heavy burden on the medical wards. We aimed to identify the characteristics of short hospitalizations. METHODS: We retrospectively retrieved data of consecutive adult patients admitted to our hospital during January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2019. We limited the cohort to patients who were admitted to the medical wards. We divided the study group into those with short, those with non-short hospitalization and those who were discharged from the ED. RESULTS: Out of 133,126 admissions, 59,994 (45.0%) were hospitalized for short term. Patients in the short hospitalization group were younger and had fewer comorbidities. The highest rate of short hospitalization was recorded during night shifts (58.4%) and the rate of short hospitalization was associated with the ED daily patient load (r = 0.35, p < 0.001). The likelihood of having a short hospitalization was most prominent in patients with suicide attempt (80.0% of those admitted for this complaint had a short hospitalization), followed by hypertension (68.6%). However, these complaints accounted for only 0.7% of the total number of short hospitalizations. Cardiac and neurological complaints however, made up 27.4% of the short hospitalizations. The 30-days mortality rate was 7.0% in the non-short hospitalization group, 4.3% in the short hospitalization group and 0.9% in those who were discharged from the ED. CONCLUSIONS: Short hospitalizations in medical wards have special characteristics that may render them predictable. Increasing the rate of treating personnel per patient during peak hours and referring subsets of patients with cardiac and neurological complaints to ED-associated short term observation units may decrease short admissions to medical departments.

The relationship between community-based psychiatric rehabilitation pathways and re-hospitalization trajectories: A three-decade follow-up.

Psychiatric rehabilitation is essential for the recovery of individuals with schizophrenia. However, re-hospitalization is sometimes inevitable. This study examined the association between varied community psychiatric rehabilitation services (PRS) and long-term re-hospitalization parameters. National registries provided data on 5163 adults diagnosed with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Patients with recurrent hospitalizations were tracked over three periods: before rehabilitation legislation (1991-2000), during rehabilitation implementation (2001-2009), and follow-up (2010-2017). Associations between PRS types and annual re-hospitalization days (ARHD) during follow-up were analyzed. Findings revealed that the rehabilitation group had a median time-to-readmission of 757 days, while the non-rehabilitation group had 321 days. Combined residential and vocational rehabilitation was associated with a 20-day decrease in ARHD, while residential or vocational rehabilitation alone were associated with reductions of 2 and 5 days, respectively. Higher levels of residential support were linked to reduced ARHD. Of the vocational rehabilitation types, supported-employment and sheltered-workshops showed association with the greatest reductions in ARHD (17 days). Overall, community-based PRS is linked to prolonged time-to-readmission and reduced re-hospitalization days. A combination of vocational and residential services is related to a synergistic decrease in re-hospitalization days. This suggests that recurrent hospitalization for patients who are using PRS is shorter and may be part of their recovery pathway.

Prescription patterns in management of Heart failure and its association with re-admissions: A retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: AHA/ACC/HFSA recently added SGLT2i in addition to RAASi, Beta-blockers and MRAs to form the 4 pillars of Guideline-directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) for management of Heart Failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Despite strong evidence suggesting improved outcomes with inpatient initiation of GDMT at target doses, significant lag has been noted in prescription practices. OBJECTIVES: To study GDMT prescription rates in patients with HFrEF at the time of hospital discharge and evaluate its association with various patient characteristics and all-cause readmission rates. METHODS: We used a modified version of Heart Failure Collaboratory (HFC) score to characterize patients into 2 groups (those with HFC score <3 and HFC score ≥3) and to examine various socio-economic and biomedical factors affecting GDMT prescription practices. RESULTS: Out of the eligible patients, the prescription rates for Beta-blockers was 77.9%, RAASi was 70.3%, and MRAs was 41%. Furthermore, Prescription rates for Sacubitril/Valsartan was 27.7% and SGLT2i was 17%. Only 1% of patients had HFC score 9 (drugs from all 4 classes at target doses). Patients of black ethnicity, those admitted on teaching service and those with HfrEF as the primary cause of admission were more likely to have HFC ≥ 3 at discharge. HFC ≥ 3 was associated with lower rates of 1-month all cause readmissions. CONCLUSION: Consistent with the prior research, our data shows significant gaps in prescription of GDMT in HFrEF. Further implementation research should be done to improve GDMT prescription during inpatient stay.

Risk factors for hospitalization-associated disability among older patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The outcomes of older patients are significantly limited by hospitalization-associated disability (HAD), and there are currently few available management options for HAD. This review aimed to identify and quantify the risk factors for HAD, to provide reliable evidence for developing a HAD prevention program centered on risk factor management among older patients. METHODS: The MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and PubMed databases were searched in March 2024 to identify cross-sectional and cohort studies that used multivariable analysis to examine risk factors for HAD among older patients. RESULTS: We screened 883 studies, 21 of which met our inclusion criteria. Our findings revealed a substantial association between various risk factors and HAD among older patients. Specifically, advanced age, female sex, Caucasian ethnicity, comorbidity burden, better activities of daily living at admission, dementia diagnosis, and longer lengths of stay were significant risk factors for HAD. Furthermore, frailty, poor physical function, immobility, and delirium were identified as confirmed risk factors for HAD among older patients. CONCLUSIONS: This review provided a comprehensive synthesis of available evidence on risk factors for HAD among older patients, serving as a valuable guide for the development of HAD prevention strategies both prior to and during hospitalization.

Predictors for the prescription of pharmacological prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism during hospitalization in Internal Medicine: a sub-analysis of the FADOI-NoTEVole study.

Patients hospitalized in Internal Medicine Units (IMUs) may frequently experience both an increased risk for thrombosis and bleeding. The use of risk assessment models (RAMs) could aid their management. We present a post-hoc analysis of the FADOI-NoTEVole study, an observational, retrospective, multi-center study conducted in 38 Italian IMUs. The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the predictors associated with the prescription of thromboprophylaxis during hospitalization. The secondary objective was to evaluate RAMs adherence. Univariate analyses were conducted as preliminary evaluations of the variables associated with prescribing pharmacological thromboprophylaxis during hospital stay. The final multivariable logistic model was obtained by a stepwise selection method, using 0.05 as the significance level for entering an effect into the model. Thromboprophylaxis was then correlated with the RAMs and the number of predictors found in the multivariate analysis. Thromboprophylaxis was prescribed to 927 out of 1387 (66.8%) patients with a Padua Prediction score (PPS) ≥ 4. Remarkably, 397 in 1230 (32.3%) patients with both PPS ≥ 4 and an IMPROVE bleeding risk score (IBS) < 7 did not receive it. The prescription of thromboprophylaxis mostly correlated with reduced mobility (OR 2.31; 95% CI 1.90-2.81), ischemic stroke (OR 2.38; 95% CI 1.34-2.91), history of previous thrombosis (OR 2.46; 95% CI 1.49-4.07), and the presence of a central venous catheter (OR 3.00; 95% CI 1.99-4.54). The bleeding risk assessment using the IBS did not appear to impact physicians' decisions. Our analysis provides insight into how indications for thromboprophylaxis were determined, highlighting the difficulties faced by physicians with patients admitted to IMUs.

Recurrent stroke admissions with vs without COVID-19 and associated in-hospital mortality: A United States nationwide analysis, 2020.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been shown to increase the risk of stroke. However, the prevalence and risk of recurrent stroke in COVID-19 patients with prior stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), as well as its impact on mortality, are not established. AIM: To evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and healthcare costs in patients with recurrent strokes. METHODS: We identified admissions of recurrent stroke (current acute ischemic stroke admissions with at least one prior TIA or stroke) in patients with and without COVID-19 using ICD-10-CM codes using the National Inpatient Sample (2020). We analyzed the impact of COVID-19 on mortality following recurrent stroke admissions by subgroups. RESULTS: Of 97455 admissions with recurrent stroke, 2140 (2.2%) belonged to the COVID-19-positive group. The COVID-19-positive group had a higher prevalence of diabetes and chronic kidney disease vs the COVID-19 negative group (P < 0.001). Among the subgroups, patients aged > 65 years, patients aged 45-64 years, Asians, Hispanics, whites, and blacks in the COVID-19 positive group had higher rates of all-cause mortality than the COVID-19 negative group (P < 0.01). Higher odds of in-hospital mortality were seen in the group aged 45-64 (OR: 8.40, 95%CI: 4.18-16.91) vs the group aged > 65 (OR: 7.04, 95%CI: 5.24-9.44), males (OR: 7.82, 95%CI: 5.38-11.35) compared to females (OR: 6.15, 95%CI: 4.12-9.18), and in Hispanics (OR: 15.47, 95%CI: 7.61-31.44) and Asians/Pacific Islanders (OR: 14.93, 95%CI: 7.22-30.87) compared to blacks (OR: 5.73, 95%CI: 3.08-10.68), and whites (OR: 5.54, 95%CI: 3.79-8.09). CONCLUSION: The study highlights the increased risk of all-cause in-hospital mortality in recurrent stroke patients with COVID-19, with a more pronounced increase in middle-aged patients, males, Hispanics, or Asians.

COVID-19 Hospitalization Outcomes for Long-Term Care Facility Residents With Dementia: Mediation by Pre-existing Health Conditions.

Background: This study explores COVID-19 emergency admission and length of hospital stay hospitalization outcomes for Long-Term Care Facility (LTCF) residents with dementia. Methods: Utilizing a cross-sectional case control design, we employed logistic regression to analyze Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File (PUDF) for 1,413 dementia patients and 1,674 non-dementia patients (>60 years) to predict emergency admission and length of hospital stay with mediation by pre-existing conditions. Results: LTCF residents with dementia have a higher likelihood of COVID-19 emergency admission and shorter hospital stays. Adjusting for confounders of demographics, health insurance, and lifestyle, dementia diagnosis remained significantly associated with emergency admission and shorter hospital stays with preexisting conditions. Conclusion: Findings underscore the heightened risk for adverse COVID-19 hospitalization care disparities with dementia. Targeted health support programs for LTCF residents with dementia should aim to improve their COVID19 hospitalization outcomes, treating pre-existing health conditions and reducing their risk for excess mortality.

Attachment classification and early adversity predict perinatal partial hospital treatment response.

BACKGROUND: Depression and anxiety are common in the perinatal period. While most of those affected respond well to treatment, a subpopulation is more resistant. Understanding more about individuals who do not respond well to available treatments may improve care for this group. METHODS: We administered entry and exit self-report measures to 178 women who participated in a specialized partial hospitalization program for perinatal individuals. Baseline measures of anxiety, obsessive symptoms, sleep quality, early life adversity, and adult attachment security were examined as potential predictors of response to treatment. RESULTS: While no individual baseline survey predicted treatment response, clustering patients on the basis of a combination of self-report adult attachment styles and early life adversity yielded four distinct groups. A cluster with high attachment anxiety, high attachment avoidance, and childhood history of verbal and emotional abuse was less responsive to treatment than the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Combining detailed information about self-report adult attachment style and early life adversity may improve prediction of treatment response in individuals with perinatal mood and anxiety disorders.

Impact of beta-blocker uptitration on patients after transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair for secondary mitral regurgitation: The OCEAN-mitral registry.

BACKGROUND: Optimal medical therapy for patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (M-TEER) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between beta-blocker uptitration and clinical outcomes after M-TEER. METHODS: Using data from the Japanese multicenter registry, we examined 1474 patients who underwent M-TEER for SMR between April 2018 and June 2021. Beta-blocker uptitration was defined as an increased dose of beta-blockers 1 month after M-TEER compared with that before M-TEER. The 2-year clinical outcomes were compared between patients with and without beta-blocker uptitration, utilizing multivariable Cox regression analyses and propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: Of the 1474 patients who underwent M-TEER, 272 (18.4 %) were receiving increasing doses of beta-blockers at the 1-month follow-up. These patients had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and higher B-type natriuretic peptide levels. Most patients in the beta-blocker uptitration group received less than the target dose of beta-blockers. Multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that beta-blocker uptitration was significantly associated with a lower risk of all-cause (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.55; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.36-0.84; P = 0.006) and cardiovascular mortalities (adjusted HR: 0.45, 95 % CI: 0.26-0.79, P = 0.006). PSM analyses revealed consistent findings. Subgroup analyses revealed a significant interaction between beta-blocker uptitration and LVEF≤40 % (interaction P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with SMR, beta-blocker uptitration after M-TEER was associated with better clinical outcomes, especially in the group with an LVEF≤40 %. Efforts to uptitrate guideline-directed medical therapy after M-TEER for SMR may be necessary, even if reaching the target dose proves challenging.