Prevalence and factors associated with inter-arm systolic and diastolic blood pressure differences: results from the baseline Fasa Adult's Cohort Study (FACS).

BACKGROUND: One of the modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular diseases is the inter-arm blood pressure difference (IAD), which can be easily measured. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and factors related to the Iranian population's inter-arm differences in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. METHOD: This cross-sectional study was conducted on the baseline data of participants who had Iranian nationality, were at least 1 year of residence in the area, aged within the age range of 35-70 years, and willed to participate from the Fasa Persian Adult Cohort Study (FACS). IAD for systolic and diastolic blood pressure was measured and categorized into two groups of difference < 10 and ≥ 10 mmHg. Logistic regression was used to model the association between independent variables and IAD. RESULTS: The prevalence of systolic and diastolic IAD ≥ 10 mmHg was 16.34% and 10.2%, respectively, among 10,124 participants. According to the multivariable logistic regression models, age (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.019 [95% CI: 1.013, 1.025]), body mass index (BMI) (aOR: 1.112 [95% CI: 1.016, 1.229]), having type 2 diabetes (aOR Yes/No: 1.172 [95% CI: 1.015, 1.368]), having chronic headaches (aOR Yes/No: 1.182 [95% CI: 1.024, 1.365]), and pulse rate (aOR: 1.019 [95% CI: 1.014, 1.024]) significantly increased the odds of systolic IAD ≥ 10 mmHg. Additionally, high socio-economic status decreased the odds of systolic IAD ≥ 10 mmHg (aOR High/Low: 0.854 [95% CI: 0.744, 0.979]). For diastolic IAD, age (aOR: 1.112 [95% CI: 1.015, 1.210]) and pulse rate (aOR: 1.021 [95% CI: 1.015, 1.027]) significantly increased the odds of diastolic IAD ≥ 10 mmHg. Moreover, high socioeconomic status decreased the odds of diastolic IAD ≥ 10 mmHg (aOR High/Low: 0.820 [95% CI: 0.698, 0.963]). CONCLUSION: The noticeable prevalence of systolic and diastolic IAD in general population exhibits health implications due to its' association with the risk of cardiovascular events. Sociodemographic and medical history assessments have potentials to be incorporated in IAD risk stratification and preventing programs.

Association of Increased Inter-arm Blood Pressure Difference with Long-term Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Objective Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) often have peripheral artery disease (PAD). It is well known that the long-term clinical outcomes of AMI are worse in patients with a low ankle-brachial index (ABI) than in patients with a preserved ABI. Unlike ABI, the association between the inter-arm blood pressure difference (IABPD) and clinical outcomes in patients with AMI has not yet been established. This retrospective study examined whether or not the IABPD is associated with long-term clinical outcomes in patients with AMI. Methods We included 979 patients with AMI and divided them into a high-IABPD group (IABPD ≥10 mmHg, n=31) and a low-IABPD group (IABPD <10 mmHg, n=948) according to the IABPD measured during hospitalization for AMI. The primary endpoint was the all-cause mortality rate. Results During a median follow-up duration of 694 days (Q1, 296 days; Q3, 1,281 days), 82 all-cause deaths were observed. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that all-cause death was more frequently observed in the high-IABPD group than in the low-IABPD group (p<0.001). A multivariate Cox hazard analysis revealed that a high IABPD was significantly associated with all-cause death (hazard ratio 2.061, 95% confidence interval 1.012-4.197, p=0.046) after controlling for multiple confounding factors. Conclusion A high IABPD was significantly associated with long-term all-cause mortality in patients with AMI. Our results suggest the usefulness of the IABPD as a prognostic marker for patients with AMI.

Systolic inter-arm blood pressure difference and estimated glomerular filtration rate in type 2 diabetic patients in Palestine: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the association between systolic inter-arm blood pressure difference (IABPD) and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), as well as chronic kidney disease (CKD), in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 189 Palestinians diagnosed with T2DM. Data were collected through personal interviews, medical records and three separate blood pressure measurements from both arms. Patients were stratified in two ways: based on systolic IABPD ≥15 mmHg and the presence of CKD, indicated by an eGFR of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 over a three months period. We used simple and multiple linear regression analyses to clarify the association between systolic IABPD (mmHg) and eGFR and to identify independent predictors for eGFR. RESULTS: The mean age was 61.3 years, with a female percentage of 57.7%. The prevalence of systolic IABPD ≥15 mmHg and CKD was 27.5% and 30.2%, respectively. Among patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, the median systolic IABPD was 12.5 mmHg (interquartile range (IQR), 13.5 mmHg), whereas in patients with eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2, it was 7.5 mmHg (IQR, 9.8 mmHg) with a significant difference (p = .021). The results of the multiple linear regression model did not reveal an independent association between systolic IABPD and eGFR, with an unstandardized coefficient (B) of -0.257 (95% confidence interval (CI), -0.623 to 0.109; p = .167). However, older age (B, -0.886; 95% CI, -1.281 to -0.49; p < .001), hypertension (B, -12.715; 95% CI, -22.553 to -2.878; p = .012) and a longer duration of DM (B, -0.642; 95% CI, -1.10 to -0.174; p = .007) were significantly and negatively associated with eGFR. CONCLUSIONS: Systolic IABPD did not exhibit an independent association with eGFR in T2DM patients. However, older age, a previous history of hypertension, and a longer duration of DM were all significantly associated with lower eGFR.

Inter-Arm Blood Pressure Difference an Indicator of Coronary Artery Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Considering the scarcity of the literature on the association between inter-arms blood pressure difference (IABPD) and coronary artery disease (CAD). AIM: We performed this study to investigate the prevalence of IABPD within the Jordanian population and to assess if it has an association with CAD. METHODS: We sampled patients visiting the cardiology clinics at the Jordan University Hospital between October, 2019 and October 2021 into two groups. Participants were divided into two groups; patients with severe CAD and control group who had no evidence of CAD. RESULTS: We measured the blood pressure for a total of 520 patients. Of the included patients, 289 (55.6 %) had CAD while 231 (44.4%) were labeled as controls who were normal. A total of 221 (42.5%) participants had systolic IABPD above 10 mmHg, while 140 (26.9%) had a diastolic IABPD above 10 mmHg. Univariate analysis demonstrated that patients with CAD were significantly more likely to be older (p < 0.001), of the male gender (p < 0.001), hypertensive (p < 0.001), and having dyslipidemia (p < 0.001). Moreover, they had significantly higher IABPD differences in terms of both systolic and diastolic blood pressure (p < 0.001 and p = 0.022, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that CAD was a positive predictor of abnormal systolic IABPD. CONCLUSION: In our study, elevated systolic IABPD was associated with a higher prevalence of severe CAD. Patients with abnormal IABPD might be subjected to more specialist investigation as IABPD consistently predicts coronary artery disease, peripheral arterial disease or other vasculopathy throughout the literature.

Clinical relevance of double-arm blood pressure measurement and prevalence of clinically important inter-arm blood pressure differences in Indian Primary Care.

Hypertension guidelines recommend measuring blood pressure (BP) in both arms at least once. However, this is seldom done due to uncertainties regarding measurement procedure and the implications of finding a clinically important inter-arm BP difference (IAD). This study aimed to provide insight into the prevalence of clinically important IADs in a large Indian primary care cohort. A number of 134678 (37% female) unselected Indian primary care participants, mean age 45.2 (SD 11.9) years, had BP measured in both arms using a standardized, triplicate, automated simultaneous measurement method (Microlife WatchBP Office Afib). On average, there were clinically minor differences in right and left arm BP values: systolic BP 134.4 vs. 134.2 mmHg (p<0.01) and diastolic BP 82.7 vs. 82.6 mmHg (p<0.01), respectively. Prevalence of significant mean systolic IAD between 10 and 15 mmHg was 7813 (5.8%). Systolic IAD ≥ 15 mmHg 2980 (2.2%) and diastolic IAD ≥ 10 mmHg 7151 (5.3%). In total, there were 7595 (5.6%) and 8548 (6.3%) participants with BP above the 140/90 mmHg threshold in only the left or right arm, respectively. Prevalence of participants with elevated BP on one arm only was highest in patients with a systolic IAD ≥ 15 mmHg; 19.1% and 13.7%, for left and right arm, respectively. This study shows that a substantial prevalence of IAD exist in Indian primary care patients. BP is above the diagnostic threshold for hypertension in one arm only for 6% of participants. These findings emphasise the importance of undertaking bilateral BP measurement in routine clinical practice. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Clinical relevance of double-arm blood pressure measurement and prevalence of clinically important inter-arm blood pressure differences in Indian primary care.

Hypertension guidelines recommend measuring blood pressure (BP) in both arms at least once. However, this is seldom done due to uncertainties regarding measurement procedure and the implications of finding a clinically important inter-arm BP difference (IAD). This study aimed to provide insight into the prevalence of clinically important IADs in a large Indian primary care cohort. A number of 134 678 (37% female) unselected Indian primary care participants, mean age 45.2 (SD 11.9) years, had BP measured in both arms using a standardized, triplicate, automated simultaneous measurement method (Microlife WatchBP Office Afib). On average, there were clinically minor differences in right and left arm BP values: systolic BP 134.4 vs 134.2 mmHg (p < .01) and diastolic BP 82.7 vs 82.6 mmHg (p < .01), respectively. Prevalence of significant mean systolic IAD between 10 and 15 mmHg was 7,813 (5.8%). Systolic IAD ≥ 15 mmHg 2,980 (2.2%) and diastolic IAD ≥ 10 mmHg 7,151 (5.3%). In total, there were 7,595 (5.6%) and 8,548 (6.3%) participants with BP above the 140/90 mmHg threshold in only the left or right arm, respectively. Prevalence of participants with elevated BP on one arm only was highest in patients with a systolic IAD ≥ 15 mmHg; 19.1% and 13.7%, for left and right arm, respectively. This study shows that a substantial prevalence of IAD exists in Indian primary care patients. BP is above the diagnostic threshold for hypertension in one arm only for 6% of participants. These findings emphasize the importance of undertaking bilateral BP measurement in routine clinical practice.

Inter-arm differences in regional arterial stiffness and geometry lead to inter-arm systolic blood pressure differences: A modelling study.

An inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference (ISBPD), if substantial in magnitude (typically defined as ≥10 mmHg), is a potential cardiovascular risk factor in adults, due to its association with cardiovascular events/mortality. A substantial ISBPD occurs in approximately 10% of the adult population, and, although associations with vascular disease and elevated stiffness have been reported, the mechanisms underlying ISBPD remain unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate whether inter-arm differences in segmental pulse wave velocity, cross-sectional area, or vascular bed compliance/resistance could give rise to substantial differences in brachial pressures between arms; for example, due to differences in pulse wave transmission and reflection. Using an established one-dimensional model of the major systemic arteries, pulse wave velocity (PWV) was uniformly increased or decreased in arteries of 1) the supra-aortic region leading up to the arm, 2) the brachial region, 3) the forearm, and 4) all of these (entire arm pathway); for the left arm, right arm, and both arms. Cross-sectional area and vascular bed compliance and resistance of the arms were similarly varied. Inter-arm differences in segmental PWV and cross-sectional area (but not bilateral changes) led to associated substantial inter-arm SBP differences, which were observed with changes to brachial, forearm and/or entire arm pathways and were related to altered transmission of forward waves and amplitude/timing of reflected waves. Vascular bed compliance and resistance had minimal influence. We conclude that inter-arm differences in arterial stiffness and geometry may contribute to inter-arm systolic blood pressure differences, warranting further investigation.

Prevalence of inter-arm blood pressure difference among young healthy adults: Results from a large cross-sectional study on 3235 participants.

More than 100 years ago, the difference in blood pressure (BP) between arms was first reported. Recent studies have shown that different blood pressure between the right and left arm leads to cardiovascular events. Three thousand and thirty volunteers participated in our cross-sectional study. The sIABP was equal in 163 of 3030 persons (5.37%), dIABP was equal in 222 out of 3030 persons (7.32%), from a total of 792/3030 persons (26.1%) sIAD >10 mmHg, and dIAD > or = 10 mmHg was found in 927 out of 3030 persons (33.5%) in the right arm, and 32.4% in the left arm. In 2692 of 3030 volunteers BP, initially recorded in the dominant hand (right arm), showing sIAD > or = 10 mmHg was found in 943 (37.1%) volunteers, and when the first measurement was done in 338 left-handed volunteers it showed sIAD > or = 10 mmHg in 112 of 338 (34.1%), P < .001; 95% confidence interval for systolic right hand were (115.73: 116.73), and for systolic left hand 95% confidence interval were (113.17:114.15). Furthermore, height, residential area, and heart rate above 90 bpm had a significant effect on IAD (P = . 041, 0.002, <001, respectively). In conclusion, significant inter-arm systolic and diastolic BP differences above (10 mm Hg) is common in the young, healthy population. Hand dominance is a significant consideration while measuring blood pressure. It is mandatory to measure blood pressure in both arms in a sitting position with a stable condition.

Association between four-limb blood pressure differences and arterial stiffness: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: Although inter-arm blood pressure difference (IAD) and inter-ankle blood pressure difference (IAND) have been shown to be associated with cardiovascular disease, controversy remains. In this study, we investigated the prevalence of IAD and IAND as well as the correlation with arterial stiffness and systolic blood pressure in a large number of the Chinese population. METHODS: The four-limb blood pressure, IAD, IAND, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) and ankle-brachial index (ABI) of 12,176 participants have been measured. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the relationship of the increase in IAD/IAND with arterial stiffness and blood pressure. Reporting adheres to the STROBE guidelines. RESULTS: In 12,176 participants, 1832 (15%) subjects had an IAD≥10 mmHg, 663 (5%) had an IAD≥15 mmHg, and 291 (2%) had an IAD≥20 mmHg. Correspondingly, 4548 (37%) had an IAND≥10 mmHg, 2706 (22%) had an IAND≥15 mmHg, and 1706 (14%) had an IAND≥20 mmHg. baPWV was significantly higher in those with an IAD≥10 mmHg (1881 ± 487 cm/s vs. 1943 ± 508 cm/s, P = 0.036) and IAND≥10 mmHg (1850 ± 476 cm/s vs. 1955 ± 509 cm/s, P = 0.000). Compared to others, those with IAD or IAND≥10 mmHg had higher systolic blood pressure (SBP), higher prevalence of hypertension, larger male gender ratio, bigger body mass index, higher pulse rate and lower ABI (P < 0.001 for all). A significant association with baPWV was observed for IAND≥10 mmHg (OR = 1.117; 95%CI: 1.039-1.201; P = 0.003) not for IAD≥10 mmHg (OR = 0.771; 95%CI: 0.699-0.851; P = 0.000) in multivariate logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Limb blood pressure differences were closely related to arterial stiffness and systolic blood pressure, allowing for a more comprehensive assessment of cardiovascular risk.

Prevalence and associated factors of inter-arm blood pressure difference in Chinese community hypertensive population.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and associated factors of inter-arm blood pressure difference (IAD) in Chinese community hypertensive population. METHODS: The cross-sectional study included 7788 hypertensive patients (3673 male and 4115 female, aged 62.3 ± 13.6 years) in Guangdong, China. IAD was defined as the absolute value of blood pressure (BP) difference between left and right arms. Bilateral BP was measured simultaneously by automated devices. RESULTS: The mean IAD was 4.04 ± 4.33 mm Hg in systolic and 3.19 ± 3.43 mm Hg in diastolic. The prevalence rates of systolic IAD (sIAD)≥5 mm Hg and ≥10 mmHg were 28.9% (n = 2247) and 12.8% (n = 996), respectively. By univariate linear regression, higher sIAD correlated with aging, higher SBP, higher DBP, lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and anti-hypertensive medication (p < 0.05). In multivariate linear regression analysis, higher sIAD was significantly associated with systolic BP (SBP, ß = 0.033; 95%CI, 0.025-0.041; p < 0.001), triacylglycerol (ß = 0.093; 95%CI, 0.017-0.169; p = 0.016), total cholesterol (ß = -0.202; 95%CI, -0.396to -0.009; p = 0.04), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; ß = 0.304; 95%CI, 0.027-0.582; p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: The elevated prevalence of large IAD was shown in hypertensive population. Meanwhile, higher levels of SBP, triacylglycerol, total cholesterol, LDL-C, and lower eGFR were associated with higher sIAD.

Effect of inter-arm blood pressure differences on outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the effect of inter-arm blood pressure differences (IABPD) on the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes of patients with coronary artery diseases. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of blood pressures measured simultaneously in the bilateral arms of 855 patients (560 males) who underwent PCI with drug-eluting stents for coronary artery diseases. IABPD was defined as the difference of blood pressure in both arms. The primary outcome was the presence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) consisting of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization. RESULTS: The mean age of the included patients was 66.2 ± 11.6 years, with a mean follow-up period of 44.5 ± 26.4 months. MACE occurred in 15.2% of patients, showing a higher rate in the higher IABPD group (≥10 mmHg) than in the lower IABPD group (<10 mmHg) (22.5% vs 14.5%, p = 0.081). The difference was induced by a higher rate of ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (17.5% vs 8.3%, p = 0.011). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a greater incidence of MACE in patients with a higher IABPD (log rank p = 0.054). The Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that IABPD was an independent predictor of long-term MACE (hazard ratio, 1.028; 95% confidence interval, 1.002-1.055; p = 0.037), along with age, diabetes mellitus, and number of implanted stents. CONCLUSION: Among patients treated with PCI, the incidence of MACE was significantly higher in those with a higher IABPD (≥10 mmHg) than in those with a lower IABPD (<10 mmHg), which was mainly driven by ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization.

The association of four-limb blood pressure differences with cardiovascular risk factors and target organ changes in elderly Chinese: The Northern Shanghai Study.

Background: The association of four-limb systolic blood pressure differences (SBPDs) including inter-arm (IASBPD), inter-leg (ILSBPD) and ankle-brachial index (ABI) with cardiovascular risk factors and target organ changes (TOCs) remains controversial. This study aims at investigating the association of those parameters with cardiovascular risk factors and TOCs in an elderly Chinese population.Methods: A total of 1528 subjects derived from the Northern Shanghai Study were studied. Four-limb BPs were simultaneously measured by VP-1000 device. Cardiovascular risk factors and TOCs including parameters of left ventricular structure and function, carotid intima-media thickness, carotid-femoral pulse-wave velocity (CF-PWV), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urinary albumin/creatinine ratio, were evaluated with standardized methods.Results: ABI significantly associated age (ß = -0.004, p < .01), female gender (ß = 0.02, p < .01), body mass index (ß = -0.004, p < .01), smoking (ß = -0.04, p < .01), high-density lipoprotein (ß = 0.04, p < .01), low-density lipoprotein (ß = -0.01, p = .01) and diabetes mellitus (ß = -0.02, p < .01), while the fourth root of IASBPD significantly associated with body mass index (ß = 0.03, p < .01), high-density lipoprotein (ß = -0.10, p = .02) and brachial SBP (ß = 0.003, p < .01); the fourth root of ILSBPD significantly associated with high-density lipoprotein (ß = -0.12, p < .01) and diabetes mellitus (ß = 0.09, p = .01). IASBPD, ILSBPD, and ABI all significantly associated with CF-PWV and eGFR (all p < .05) in either unadjusted or adjusted models, but not with other TOCs.Conclusion: Four-limb SBPDs, namely ABI, IASBPD, and ILSBPD, bore various burdens of cardiovascular risk factors and significantly and independently associated with CF-PWV and eGFR.

Inter-Arm Blood Pressure Difference in Diabetes Mellitus and Its Preferential Association with Peripheral Artery Disease.

AIM: Inter-arm blood pressure difference (IAD) is known to be associated with a composite of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and with CVD risk factors. However, only limited information is available regarding the contribution of diabetes mellitus to IAD and the association of IAD with individual CVDs, such as coronary artery disease (CAD), stroke, and peripheral artery disease (PAD). METHODS: We addressed these issues in this cross-sectional study of 2580 participants who had simultaneous blood pressure measurements in both arms using an automated device. RESULTS: Compared with 1,264 nondiabetic subjects, 1316 patients with diabetes mellitus had a greater IAD (P=0.01) and a higher prevalence of IAD of ≥ 10 mmHg (8.4% vs. 5.4%, P=0.002). However, such difference was not significant after the adjustment for potential confounders. Among CAD, stroke, and PAD, only PAD was significantly associated with IAD in a model adjusted for the CVD risk factors. Age was found to modify the association between IAD and PAD, with the association being more prominent in the younger subgroup. CONCLUSION: Thus, diabetes mellitus itself was not an independent factor associated with IAD. A larger IAD was preferentially associated with the presence of PAD, and this association was modified by age.

Longitudinal association between adiposity and inter-arm blood pressure difference.

This is the first longitudinal study evaluating whether adiposity is associated with inter-arm blood pressure difference. We evaluated 714 overweight/obese individuals aged 40-65 years over a 3-year follow-up. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured in both arms simultaneously using an automated machine. Linear regression assessed the associations of body mass index, fat %, waist, neck, thigh, and arm circumferences (cm), with absolute inter-arm differences in systolic (IAS) and diastolic (IAD) blood pressure (mm Hg). Poisson regression was used for binary outcomes (IAS and IAD ≥ 10 mm Hg). All models were adjusted for age, gender, smoking, physical activity, and HOMA-IR. Adiposity measures were associated with increased IAS and IAD (ß range: 0.09-0.20 and 0.09-0.30). Neck circumference showed the strongest association with IAS (ß = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.37) and IAD (ß = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.47); arm circumference showed a similar association with IAS, but lower with IAD. Highest quartiles of BMI, thigh, and arm showed significant associations with IAS (IRR: 2.21, 2.46 and 2.70). Highest quartiles of BMI, waist, neck, and arm circumferences were significantly associated with IAD (IRR: 2.38, 2.68, 4.50 and 2.24). If the associations are corroborated in other populations, adiposity may be an important modifiable risk factor for inter-arm blood pressure difference with a large potential public health impact.

Significance of the combination of inter-limb blood pressure differences in the elderly: The Northern Shanghai Study.

Whether the combination of inter-arm and inter-leg systolic blood pressure differences (BPDs) and ankle-brachial index is of clinical significance remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association of the combination of inter-limb systolic BPDs with cardiovascular risk factors and hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD). A total of 2621 elderly subjects from the Northern Shanghai Study were divided into Group A, B, and C consisting of participants with 0, 1, and ≥2 abnormal inter-limb systolic BPDs, respectively. Comparisons of cardiovascular risk factors and parameters of cardiac, vascular, and renal damage between groups and logistic regression models were conducted. The proportions of subjects presenting 0, 1, and ≥2 abnormal inter-limb systolic BPDs were 60.9%, 25.1%, and 14.0%, respectively. Upward trends, from Group A, through Group B, to Group C, were observed for the level or prevalence of nearly all cardiovascular risk factors and HMOD (P for trend ≤0.007 for all). In multiple logistic regression, Group C showed significantly higher odds for carotid plaque (vs Group A: Odds ratio [OR] = 1.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.43-2.48; vs Group B: OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.08-1.97), arterial stiffness (vs Group A: OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 0.96-1.65; vs Group B: OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.01-1.83), and left ventricular hypertrophy (vs Group A: OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.04-1.76; vs Group B: OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 0.93-1.67), when compared with Group A and B. In conclusion, the combination of abnormal inter-limb systolic BPDs significantly associates with greater burden of cardiovascular risk factors and higher likelihood for HMOD, especially carotid plaque, arterial stiffness, and left ventricular hypertrophy.

Inter-arm Systolic Blood Pressure Difference in Physically Active, Adult Subjects.

INTRODUCTION: Increased inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference (ΔPsys) has been associated with cardiovascular (CV) disease in elderly patients with CV risk factors. However, its significance in healthy subjects is unclear. AIM: To determine the relationship between ΔPsys, the individual level of physical activity and the global CV risk in apparently healthy adults. METHODS: Systolic blood pressure was measured in both arms in 400 subjects aged 46.5 ± 12.2 years, using a simultaneous oscillometric device (WatchBP Office, Microlife, Widnau, Switzerland). In the subjects with ΔPsys ≥ 10 mmHg (Cases n = 20) and in a Control group (20 subjects without ΔPsys ≥ 10 mmHg), another simultaneous measurement was repeated during a second visit. The physical activity level was assessed via the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF), the ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) with a photoplethysmographic method (Angioflow-Microlab, Padova, Italy) and the CV risk via the Framingham Risk Score (FRS). RESULTS: The prevalence of ΔPsys ≥ 10 mmHg in the whole population was 5% (95% CI 3.24-8.01%). Cases and Controls were comparable in gender, age, and BMI. ΔPsys ≥ 10 mmHg was only confirmed in 17.6% of the Cases. No statistically significant differences were found between groups for IPAQ-SF, ABPI, or FRS. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of ΔPsys ≥ 10 mmHg in this population was only slightly lower than what observed in older, hypertensive or diabetic patients. Cases and Controls did not differ in physical activity level, ankle brachial pressure index and CV risk. However, low test-retest reliability might limit the use of ΔPsys as a reliable marker for CV screening in this population.

Relationship between inter-arm blood pressure difference and severity of coronary atherosclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A greater inter-arm blood pressure difference (IABPD) is associated with atherosclerosis, but its association with coronary artery disease is unknown. We investigated the relationship between IABPD and coronary atherosclerosis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed blood pressure (BP) data that was measured simultaneously in both arms of patients who underwent initial coronary angiography. Coronary atherosclerosis was assessed using the Gensini score, based on quantitative coronary angiography findings. To adjust for the effect of baseline BP, the percentages of systolic IABPD to higher mean BP (cIABPDsys), diastolic IABPD to higher mean BP (cIABPDdia), and mean IABPD to higher mean BP (cIABPDmean) were calculated as BP-adjusted IABPDs. RESULTS: We examined the records of 816 patients (516 males, mean age: 65.5 ± 11.8 years). The mean Gensini score was 33.4 ± 30.4, and the median was 25. All cIAPBDs had positive correlations with the Gensini score (cIABPDsys: r = 0.208, p < 0.001; cIABPDdia: r = 0.123, p < 0.001; cIABPDmean: r = 0.120, p = 0.001). Multiple regression analysis indicated that cIABPDsys was associated with the Gensini score, independently of age, gender, smoking, diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia (B = 0.031, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The BP-adjusted IABPD parameters are related to the severity of coronary artery disease. Further studies should investigate the use of the IABPD to improve management of coronary atherosclerosis.