Visual Improvement and Lowered Intraocular Pressure After Surgical Management of In-The-Bag Intraocular Lens Dislocation and Aphakia Correction; Retrospective Analysis of Scleral Suturing versus Retropupillary Fixated Iris-Claw Intraocular Lens During a 5-Year Period.

Purpose: We compare and evaluate the visual outcome and complication rate of two different techniques of surgical management of in-the-bag intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation or aphakia correction. In addition, we evaluate possible risk factors for IOL dislocation or aphakia. Patients and Methods: This retrospective case series reviewed medical records for all patients who had undergone surgery for IOL dislocation or aphakia during a 5-year period at a single ophthalmic center in Sweden. The two most common procedures, scleral suturing of dislocated in-the-bag IOL and retropupillary fixation of iris-claw IOL, were further analyzed. Main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), reoperations, and complications. Results: The study comprised 110 eyes, including scleral suturing procedures (n=35) and retropupillary iris-claw IOL (n=75). There was a significantly higher rate of dense cataract (p=0.030) and posterior capsular rupture (PCR), (p=0.016) among iris-claw cases at the primary cataract extraction with pseudoexfoliations in about two-thirds of patients in both groups. All eyes in the scleral suturing group had an IOL dislocation. In the iris-claw group, 23 eyes (30.7%) were aphakic following complicated cataract surgery with PCR. No intraoperative complications occurred in any eyes during the secondary IOL procedure. Both groups showed significant improvement in BCVA, yet there was no significant difference between groups in postoperative BCVA (p=0.263). However, the scleral suturing group experienced a significantly larger improvement in BCVA due to worse BCVA preoperatively (p=0.005). Intraocular pressure decreased significantly after both repositioning and exchange surgery (p=0.002 and 0.010 respectively), but improvement between groups was not significantly different (p=0.264). Conclusion: Both surgical methods resulted in significantly improved BCVA and lowering of IOP and can be considered safe with limited complications. The outcome was similar between groups. Pseudoexfoliation prevalence was high in both groups indicating that it may be a risk factor for either aphakia or late IOL dislocation.

Light- and drug-induced pupillary dynamics in eyes with a retropupillary iris-claw intraocular lens.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the pupillary characteristics and response to light and drugs in eyes with posterior chamber (PC) placement of iris-claw intraocular lens (IC-IOL). METHODS: In this cross-sectional, comparative study, we included adults with an IC-IOL implanted in the PC of a single eye. We excluded patients with ocular trauma, postoperative IC-IOL displacement or complications, and extended iris atrophy. We used anterior segment optical coherence tomography to perform light-controlled pupillography, measure the pupil diameter (PD), and estimated the pupil circularity under mesopic conditions. PD was also assessed under photopic, scotopic, pharmacological mydriasis, and miosis conditions. The results were compared to those of the fellow eye, phakic, or regular pseudophakic. RESULTS: The IC-IOL and control groups included 30 eyes each. The most frequent reasons for IC-IOL implantation were complicated cataract (37%) and dislocated/luxated prior IOL (33%). Compared to the control group, the IC-IOL group had lower visual acuity, a smaller PD under scotopic conditions (p = 0.0010) and after pharmacological mydriasis (p < 0.0001), and a larger PD after pharmacological miosis (p < 0.0001). Mesopic pupil circularity was comparable between the groups. We also considered ongoing extraocular treatments with possible effects on iris motility. CONCLUSIONS: The pupillary size and profile were similar between the groups in mesopic light. Reduced mydriasis was noted in response to light and drugs, while the degree of miosis was reduced in response to inducing drugs in the IC-IOL compared to the control group. This study complements previous results concerning the PC placement of IC-IOLs by adding original observations on drug-induced pupil motility.

[Secondary implantation of retropupillary fixated iris-claw intraocular lenses]. / Sekundärversorgung mit retropupillar fixierten Irisklauenlinsen.

BACKGROUND: There is no standard for the treatment of functional aphakia in cases with a compromised capsular system. Retropupillary fixation of an Artisan iris-claw IOL ("Intraokularlinse") is one of the established procedures. OBJECTIVE: Aim of this study was the evaluation of indications, visual and refractive long-term results and complication rates after retropupillary implantation of an iris-claw lens. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study comprised 366 eyes that received a retropupillary Artisan intraocular lens (IOL) in a single center between January 2009 and December 2019. The mean follow-up period was 249 days (8 months) ±516 days. RESULTS: IOL dislocation (68%) was the most common reason for a retropupillary iris-claw implantation. Previous vitrectomy was a significant preoperative risk factor for IOL dislocation (p = 0.0001). Best corrected visual acuity improved from 0.65 ± 0.64 (logMAR) preoperatively to 0.57 ± 0.51 (logMAR) 4-6 weeks after the surgery. The mean deviation from the planned refraction was +0.40 ± 1.37 dpt and 73% of the patients had a deviation within ±1 dpt of the planned refraction. Relevant postoperative complications during the first 4 weeks were pupillary distortion (42%), ocular hypotony (15%) and transient hyphema (14%). Late complications (≥4 weeks after the surgery) included persistent pupillary distortion (20%), cystoid macular edema (13%) and iris-claw disenclavation (6%). CONCLUSION: The retropupillary Artisan implantation is an efficient method for treating aphakia without capsular support and provides good visual and refractive results with an acceptable surgical risk profile.

Preferred practice patterns in aphakia management in adults in India: A survey.

Purpose: To assess different approaches in the management of aphakia in adults in Indian ophthalmologists via an online survey. Methods: A survey-monkey based online questionnaire was fielded to Indian ophthalmologists in accordance with the CHERRIES guidelines. We recorded participants' demographics, practice settings, and preferred surgical options including the type of intraocular lens (IOL) preferred when encountering a case of aphakia in adults with and without adequate capsular support. Differences between anterior segment (AS) surgeons and vitreoretinal (VR) surgeons as well as differences between surgeons with more or less than 10 years of surgical experience were evaluated using analytic statistics. Results: Of the 481 surgeons who responded to the survey, 369 (77%) were AS surgeons and the remaining 112 (23%) were VR surgeons and represented all regions of India. When encountering posterior capsular rent during cataract surgery, a three-piece IOL in the ciliary sulcus was the most preferred (n = 275, 57%) when there was adequate capsular support, while a retrofixated iris-claw IOL (n = 91, 19%) was the commonest choice in eyes without adequate capsular support. With associated nucleus drop, 85% of surgeons preferred to refer the patient to a VR surgeon and left the eye aphakic. Multivariable logistic regression showed that VR surgeons were more than six times likely to prefer a scleral fixated intraocular lens (SFIOLs) [odds ratio (OR) = 6.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.4-12.5, P < 0.001] and surgeons with >10 years of experience were also twice more likely to prefer an SFIOL (OR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.2-4.9, P = 0.02). Conclusion: The choice of IOL in absence of capsular support in adult eyes differs between AS and VR surgeons and is also influenced by the surgeon's experience.

Tilt and decentration of posterior and anterior iris-claw intraocular lenses: a pilot study using anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

BACKGROUND: Information on the centration and tilt of iris-claw intraocular lenses (IC-IOLs) is limited. In this study, we tested the capacity of an anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) instrument to measure decentration and tilt of anterior and posterior IC-IOLs through an integrated software. METHODS: The present observational, cross-sectional study was conducted at University Eye Clinic of Parma (Parma, Italy). The CASIA2 swept-source AS-OCT (Tomey Corp.) was used to measure the tilt and decentration of posterior and anterior IC-IOLs in patients implanted at least 6 months in advance. After failure with full-automation, semi-manual IOL tracing was applied. In-the-bag (IB) contralateral IOLs, when present, were measured automatically. The Bland-Altman method was used to evaluate the agreement between repeated measurements (2 images for each study eye). The amount and direction of tilt and decentration were recorded and plotted into polar charts for evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients were included: 14 with posterior and 7 with anterior IC-IOL fixation. In 17 eyes (81%), the AS-OCT provided a repeatable measurement of tilt and decentration. All contralateral eyes with IB IOL were automatically measured. The median decentration was 0.67 mm, 0.24 mm, and 0.24 mm in posterior IC-IOLs, anterior IC-IOLs, and IB IOLs group, respectively. The median tilt was 5.0°, 5.6°, and 5.6° for posterior IC-IOLs, anterior IC-IOLs, and IB IOLs, respectively. Tilt direction was mainly temporal, while decentration was inferior-temporal with posterior IC-IOLs and scattered with anterior IC-IOLs and IB IOLs. CONCLUSIONS: The semi-manual tracing function of the CASIA2 AS-OCT provides repeatable and affordable measurements of the decentration and tilt of IC-IOLs in both the anterior and posterior chamber. Data from the former group were similar to the IB group.

Anterior Versus Retropupillary Iris-Claw Intraocular Lens: Indications, Visual Outcome and Postoperative Complications.

INTRODUCTION: In cases of inadequate capsular support for intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, iris-claw IOL is a practical option. Iris-claw IOL can be implanted anteriorly or retropupillary. In this study, we compare the outcome of implantation of iris-claw IOL between anterior and retropupillary locations. METHODS: We retrospectively examined the characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent iris-claw "Artisan®" intraocular lens implantation (IOL) during the period of January 2014 to July 2020. The study population included all patients who underwent iris-claw IOL implantation, whether as a primary or secondary implantation, regardless of the causative indication. The study population was categorized by location of implantation and indication. The outcome was compared by visual acuity and postoperative complications. RESULTS: In this study, 171 eyes of 151 patients were included. Iris-claw IOL was implanted anteriorly in 110 (64.3%) eyes. The most common indication for iris-claw IOL was complicated cataract surgery, followed by ectopia lentis and by trauma. Patients with retropupillary position achieved better visual outcome whatever the causative indication. Anterior iris-claw IOL patients had more high intraocular pressure readings and macular edema. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that retropupillary iris-claw IOL may achieve better visual outcome without significant postoperative complications. Further prospective studies and trials on larger sample sizes are needed.

Retropupillary iris-claw intraocular lens implantation in aphakic patients.

Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of implantation of an iris-claw intraocular lens (IC-IOL) in retropupillary position in aphakic patients. Methods: We conducted a prospective interventional study, including 36 aphakic eyes with inadequate capsular support. The postoperative examination included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, central corneal thickness (CCT), and anterior segment examination with emphasis on the anterior chamber reaction and shape of pupil. Follow-up was done for 3 months. Results: Thirty-six eyes of 34 patients, including 22 right eyes and 14 left eyes were included. Indications for surgery were complicated cataract surgery in 38.9% (n = 14), aphakia in 27.8% (n = 10), pseudophakic bullous keratopathy in 16.7% (n = 6), dislocated posterior chamber IOL (PCIOL) in 11.1% (n = 4), IC drop in 2.8% (n = 1), and subluxated PCIOL in 2.8% (n = 1). Postoperatively, the visual acuity improved by at least two lines in 32 (88.9%) and worsened in four (11.1%) eyes at the end of three months. Mean postoperative IOP at the end of the third month was 12.42 mmHg (standard deviation [SD] 2.57; range 11.55-13.29 mmHg). The mean postoperative CCT at the end of the third month was 542.42 microns (SD 13.77; range 537.76-547.07 microns). Sixteen eyes (44.4%) had horizontally oval pupil, eleven eyes (30.6%) had round pupil, and nine eyes (25%) had irregular pupil. Twenty-three eyes (63.9%) presented with significant anterior chamber reaction and seven eyes (19.4%) had corneal stromal edema on postoperative day 1. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that retropupillary IC-IOL implantation in eyes without adequate capsular support is an effective and safe procedure with a good visual outcome and fewer complications.

Comparative analysis of retropupillary iris claw versus scleral-fixated intraocular lens in the management of post-cataract aphakia.

PURPOSE: To compare the visual outcomes and complications between the eyes receiving retropupillary iris claw intraocular lens (IOL) and scleral-fixated IOL (SFIOL) for post-cataract aphakia. METHODS: Medical records of consecutive patients who had iris claw IOL and SFIOL surgery from January 2010 to March 2015, with > 1 year of follow up were retrospectively analyzed. The surgical technique was based on individual surgeon preference. The best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), previous surgery, surgical technique, and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Retropupillary iris claw IOL was fixated in 48 eyes (46%) and SFIOL was performed in 56 eyes. Iris claw was performed more frequently at the time of primary cataract surgery (56%) compared to SFIOL (14%) (P < 0.001). At 1 month postoperative, BCDVA was significantly better in the SFIOL group [0.7 ± 0.5 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in iris claw vs. 0.3 ± 0.2 logMAR in SFIOL, P < 0.001] but this difference did not persist at 1 year (0.4 ± 0.4 logMAR in iris claw vs. 0.3 ± 0.2 logMAR in SFIOL, P = 0.56). Eyes with iris claw IOL experienced significantly more postoperative iritis (17%), intraocular pressure spikes (10%), and ovalization of the pupil (16%). CONCLUSION: Retropupillary iris claw IOL fixation is as safe as SFIOL for visual rehabilitation of post-cataract aphakia. Visual rehabilitation following iris claw IOL might take longer than SFIOL. Ovalization of the pupil is the commonest adverse effect reported with this type of IOL design.

Primary iris claw IOL retrofixation with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide in cases of inadequate capsular support.

PURPOSE: To assess the outcomes and analyze complication rates following primary iris claw IOL retrofixation with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide. METHODS: This is a retrospective interventional case series. Patients with poor capsular support-diagnosed preoperatively or owing to intraoperative complications-were treated with iris claw IOL retrofixation with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide. The data were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: 104 eyes of 102 patients with poor capsular support who underwent the procedure between 2010 and 2013 were analyzed. The minimum follow-up period was 12 months (ranging from 12 to 36 months). Iris claw IOL was implanted in-traumatic subluxated cataracts-24 cases (23.07%), non-traumatic subluxated cataracts in 16 cases (15.38%), or as a complication of cataract surgery-intraoperative posterior capsular rent in 48 cases (46.15%) and intraoperative nucleus drop in 16 cases (15.38%). The final mean best-corrected logMAR visual acuity improved from 1.36 ± 0.64 preoperatively to 0.36 ± 0.32 at 1-year follow-up. Complications included pupil ovalization in 11 cases (10.57%), transient elevation in intraocular pressure in 7 eyes (6.73%), postoperative hypotony in 5 eyes (4.80%), cystoid macular edema in 2 eyes (1.92%), retinal detachment in 1 eye (0.96%), vitreous hemorrhage in 1 eye (0.96%), and hyphema in 1 eye (0.96%). CONCLUSION: Primary iris claw IOL retrofixation provided excellent alternative in patients with inadequate capsular support. The visual outcomes were good along with favorable rates of complications. The addition of triamcinolone acetonide helps in reducing the chances of cystoid macular edema.

Calculation of iris-claw IOL power for correction of late in-the-bag IOL complex dislocation.

BACKGROUND: To assess the constants and formula for aphakia correction with iris-claw IOLs to achieve the best refractive status in cases of late in-the-bag IOL complex dislocation. METHODS: A literature search was performed. The following data were obtained: Iris-claw IOL model, Iridal or retroiridal enclavation, A-constant, ultrasound or optical biometry, formula employed and refractive outcomes. Acceptable emmetropia was considered if the resulting spherical equivalent (SE) was within ±1.00 D. RESULTS: The majority of the studies used SRK/T formula (66.6%). The 88.9% of the reports obtained a SE within ±1.00 D. Using A-115 for ultrasound biometry and A-115.7 for optical biometry and SRK/T formula, the emmetropia (±1.00 D) of SE, was able to get near 100% of reported cases over the pupil implantation. However, the emmetropia decreased to 80% when the enclavation is retropupilar using the same formula. The A-constant can vary from 116.7 to 117.5 for retropupilar enclavation. CONCLUSIONS: Using A-115 for ultrasound biometry and A-115.7 for optical biometry and SRK/T formula, ±1.00 D of SE, is able to get near 100% of cases. Nevertheless, ±1.00 D of SE decreased to 80% of the cases when the enclavation is retropupilar.

Retropupilar positioning of foldable iris-claw intraocular lens for correction of aphakia with no capsular support.

SUMMARY: Iris-claw intraocular lens (ICIOL) for aphakia needs a large 5.4 mm corneal incision for its implantation. The technique needs corneal suture, associated with some postoperative astigmatism. Foldable ICIOL is used in phakic patients undergoing refractive surgery and has the advantage of a sutureless small corneal incision. We report a case of a high myopic patient with dislocated intraocular lens (IOL) and no capsular support. Dislocated IOL with its capsular bag was released with three-port, 23-gauge vitrectomy; placed in the anterior chamber; sliced; and extruded through a 3.2-mm corneal incision, where a foldable ICIOL was introduced and placed retropupillary. This technique achieved a stable fixation of the IOL. Retropupillary implantation of a foldable ICIOL on aphakic patients has advantages over that of a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) ICIOL due to smaller corneal incision. The technique may be safe and easy to perform. PURPOSE: The purpose of this report was to describe the technique of retropupillary implantation of a foldable iris-claw intraocular lens (ICIOL) in a patient with dislocated intraocular lens (IOL) in mid vitreous cavity. METHODS: Foldable ICIOL (Artiflex® Myopia Model 401) is used in phakic patients undergoing refractive surgery and has the advantage of a sutureless small corneal incision. We report a case of a high myopic patient with dislocated IOL and no capsular support. The calculation was a -5.0 D IOL for retropupilar position, and a foldable ICIOL was introduced through a 3.2-mm corneal incision and placed retropupillary. RESULTS: The technique was easy to achieve. IOL was properly positioned retropupillary and maintained stable. There was no ocular hypertension and no anterior chamber flare or iris atrophy. CONCLUSION: Retropupillary implantation of a foldable ICIOL on aphakic patients has advantages over that of a PMMA ICIOL due to smaller corneal incision. The technique may be safe and easy to perform.

Retropupillary iris claw intraocular lens implantation in aphakia for dislocated intraocular lens.

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, dislocated intraocular lenses (IOLs) and inadequate capsular support are becoming a challenge for every ophthalmic surgeon. Explantation of dislocated IOL and iris claw IOL (ICIOL) are the techniques that have been used in our ophthalmic department. The aim of this study is to report our technique for retropupillar ICIOL. METHODS: This study is a retrospective case series. A total of 105 eyes with dislocated IOL from the patients at the Department of Ophthalmology in Santa Maria Hospital, a tertiary reference hospital in Lisbon, Portugal, from January 2012 until January 2016, had been analyzed. Of these 105 eyes, 66 eyes had dislocated one-piece IOL and 39 eyes had dislocated three-piece IOL. The latter underwent iris suture of the same IOL and were excluded from this study. The remaining 66 eyes with dislocated one-piece IOL underwent pars plana vitrectomy, that is, explantation of dislocated IOL through corneal incision and an implantation of retropupillary ICIOL. Operative data and postoperative outcomes included best corrected visual acuity, IOL position, intraocular pressure, pigment dispersion, clinical signs of endothelial cell loss, and anterior chamber depth. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 23 months (range: 6-48 months). The mean preoperative best corrected visual acuity was 1.260±0.771 logMAR, and postoperative best corrected visual acuity was 0.352±0.400 logMAR units. Mean vision gain was 0.909 logMar units. The patients had the following complications: 1) retinal detachment was found in one patient, 2) corneal edema was found in three patients, 3) high intraocular pressure was observed in twelve patients, 4) subluxation of the IOL was observed in one patient, and 5) macular edema was found in three eyes. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that retropupillary ICIOL is an easy and effective method for the correction of aphakia in patients not receiving capsule support. The safety of this procedure must be interpreted in the context of a surgery usually indicated in complicated cases.

Retropupillary iris-claw intraocular lens in ectopia lentis in Marfan syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To report visual outcomes, complication rate, and safety of retropupillary iris-claw intraocular lens (ICIOL) in ectopia lentis in Marfan syndrome (MFS). DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: Six eyes of three MFS patients with ectopia lentis underwent surgery for subluxation lens and retropupillary ICIOL implantation from October 2014 to October 2015 at the Department of Ophthalmology, Santa Maria Hospital in Lisbon, Portugal. Demographics, preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and intraocular pressure were evaluated. Endothelium cell count was assessed using specular microscopy; anterior chamber depth was measured using Pentacam postoperatively; and intraocular lens position was viewed by ultrasound biomicroscopy. All patients were female; mean age was 20±14.264 years (range: 7-38 years). RESULTS: The average follow-up period was 6.66 months (range: 4-16 months). Preoperative BCVA was 0.568±0.149 logMAR units, and postoperative BCVA was 0.066±0.121 logMAR units. The mean BCVA gain was -0.502±0.221 on the logMAR scale. Postoperative average astigmatism and intraocular pressure were 1.292±0.697 mmHg (range: 0.5-2.25 mmHg) and 16 mmHg (range: 12-18 mmHg), respectively. The average endothelial cell density decreased from 3,121±178 cells/mm(2) before surgery to 2,835±533 cells/mm(2) after surgery (measured at last follow-up visit) and in the last follow-up, representing an average endothelial cell loss of 9.16%. Mean anterior chamber depth was 4.01 mm (±0.77 mm), as measured by Pentacam. No complications were found intra- or postoperatively in any of the six studied eyes. CONCLUSION: Retropupillary ICIOL implantation is a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of aphakia in MFS eyes, without capsular support after surgery for ectopia lens. The six eyes that underwent lensectomy and retropupillary ICIOL implantation have had excellent visual outcomes with no complications so far.