Sex and body height influences on patellofemoral joint reaction force during stair ascent.

BACKGROUND: Females are at greater risk of developing patellofemoral pain (PFP) than males, and an excessive patellofemoral joint reaction force (PFJRF) may contribute to this discrepancy. It is unknown if the PFJRF differs between males and females during stair ascent. Additionally, body height may also influence the PFJRF. This study investigated PFJRF differences between males and females and explored relationships between body height and PFJRF during stair ascent. METHODS: Thirty males (25.6 (2.7) yr) and thirty females (23.7 (2.2) yr) ascended stairs (96 steps/min). Three-dimensional kinematics (200 Hz) and kinetics (2000 Hz) were recorded and used to calculate biomechanical dependent variables. RESULTS: Females experienced a greater PFJRF magnitude (mean difference (MD) = 3.2 N/kg; 95% CI = 0.5, 5.9; p = 0.022) and rate (MD = 23.8 N/kg/sec; 95% CI = 2.7, 45.1; p = 0.029), quadriceps muscle force (3.1 N/kg; 95% CI = 0.2, 6.0; p = 0.036), and knee flexion angle (MD = 2.3°; 95% CI = 0.3, 4.3; p = 0.026). Females exhibited shorter quadriceps lever arm length (MD = -0.1 cm; 95% CI = -0.2, 0.0; p = 0.024) and body height (MD = -16.9 cm; 95% CI = -20.5, -13.2, p < 0.001) compared to males. Body height was inversely correlated with PFJRF magnitude (r = -0.31; p = 0.017), rate (r = -0.28; p = 0.032), and knee flexion angle (r = -0.54; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Females experienced a greater PFJRF than males. Additionally, the PFJRF and body height were inversely correlated. This observed difference may contribute to the PFP sex discrepancy and be due, at least in part, to body height differences.

A new magnetic internal distractor: cadaveric study of changes in trapeziometacarpal joint forces.

Distraction is a new treatment for trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to test the efficiency of magnetic distraction using a new internal distractor in cadavers. The distractor consists of two magnets embedded inside titanium capsules that are implanted on either side of the trapeziometacarpal joint with the same poles facing each other, so that the force between the magnets distracts the joint. Intra-articular forces were recorded pre-implantation, immediately after implantation and again 10 minutes later. We also studied the changes in the forces before and after the procedure in different thumb positions. Our findings show that the trapeziometacarpal joint could be offloaded in all the studied trapeziometacarpal positions.

The elbow is the load-bearing joint during arm swing.

BACKGROUND: Arm swing plays a role in gait by accommodating forward movement through trunk balance. This study evaluates the biomechanical characteristics of arm swing during gait. METHODS: The study performed computational musculoskeletal modeling based on motion tracking in 15 participants without musculoskeletal or gait disorder. A three-dimensional (3D) motion tracking system using three Azure Kinect (Microsoft) modules was used to obtain information in the 3D location of shoulder and elbow joints. Computational modeling using AnyBody Modeling System was performed to calculate the joint moment and range of motion (ROM) during arm swing. RESULTS: The mean ROM of the dominant elbow was 29.7°±10.2° and 14.2°±3.2° in flexion-extension and pronation-supination, respectively. The mean joint moment of the dominant elbow was 56.4±12.7 Nm, 25.6±5.2 Nm, and 19.8±4.6 Nm in flexion-extension, rotation, and abduction-adduction, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The elbow bears the load created by gravity and muscle contracture in dynamic arm swing movement.

The influence of induced gait asymmetry on joint reaction forces.

Chronic injury- or disease-induced joint impairments result in asymmetric gait deviations that may precipitate changes in joint loading associated with pain and osteoarthritis. Understanding the impact of gait deviations on joint reaction forces (JRFs) is challenging because of concurrent neurological and/or anatomical changes and because measuring JRFs requires medically invasive instrumented implants. Instead, we investigated the impact of joint motion limitations and induced asymmetry on JRFs by simulating data recorded as 8 unimpaired participants walked with bracing to unilaterally and bilaterally restrict ankle, knee, and simultaneous ankle + knee motion. Personalized models, calculated kinematics, and ground reaction forces (GRFs) were input into a computed muscle control tool to determine lower limb JRFs and simulated muscle activations guided by electromyography-driven timing constraints. Unilateral knee restriction increased GRF peak and loading rate ipsilaterally but peak values decreased contralaterally when compared to walking without joint restriction. GRF peak and loading rate increased with bilateral restriction compared to the contralateral limb of unilaterally restricted conditions. Despite changes in GRFs, JRFs were relatively unchanged due to reduced muscle forces during loading response. Thus, while joint restriction results in increased limb loading, reductions in muscle forces counteract changes in limb loading such that JRFs were relatively unchanged.

Ulnohumeral joint static cartilage compression is affected by radial head implant size.

INTRODUCTION: Radiocapitellar joint arthroplasty is a commonly performed procedure, which often leads to early failure or instability. Few studies assess the effect of radiocapitellar joint arthroplasty on the ulnohumeral joint. We hypothesized that static forces of contact (compressing cartilage, or cartilage relaxation contact force) would reveal the effect of varying radial head implant size and elbow position on the ulnohumeral joint. METHODS: A minimally-invasive method of measuring cartilage relaxation contact force was utilized in 10 fresh-frozen human cadaveric specimens that did not require significant dissection or intraarticular sensor placement. Specimens were rigidly fixed in various positions of elbow flexion and forearm pronosupination with increasing radial head implant lengths. Uniaxial distracting forces were applied and displacement was repeatedly measured with resultant best-fit polynomial curves to determine inflections corresponding to the force required to overcome static cartilage relaxation as in previous work. FINDINGS: Baseline mean (intra-cadaver) cartilage relaxation contact force was 11.8 N (standard error of the mean = 0.3) at 90° of elbow flexion and neutral rotation. There was little variation within specimens (Intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.94). Cartilage relaxation contact force increased at the ulnohumeral joint with radial head implant overstuffing (> 4 mm, P < 0.05) and elbow flexion (120°, P < 0.001). Pronosupination altered cartilage relaxation contact force in an implant-length independent manner (P < 0.05). INTERPRETATION: Radiocapitellar joint arthroplasty implant length and elbow joint position independently contribute to increased cartilage relaxation contact force at the ulnohumeral joint. This further supports attempts at anatomic reconstruction of the radiocapitellar joint to prevent pathologic ulnohumeral joint loading.

A numerical study of the contact geometry and pressure distribution along the glenoid track.

The glenoid track geometry and the contact forces acting on the glenohumeral joint at static positions of 30°, 60°, 90° and 120° of abduction with 90° of external rotation were evaluated using a finite element model of the shoulder that, differently from most usual approximations, accounts the humeral head translations and the deformable-to-deformable non-spherical joint contact. The model was based on data acquired from clinical exams of a single subject, including the proximal humerus, scapula, their respective cartilages concerning the glenohumeral joint, and the rotator cuff and deltoid muscles. The forces acting on the glenohumeral joint were estimated using a simulation framework consisting of an optimization procedure allied with finite element analysis that seeks the minimum muscle forces that stabilize the joint. The joint reaction force magnitude increases up to 680.25 N at 90° of abduction and decreases at further positions. From 60° onward the articular contact remains at the anterior region of the glenoid cartilage and follows an inferior to superior path at the posterior region of the humeral head cartilage. The maximum contact pressure of 3.104 MPa occurs at 90° abduction. Although translating inferiorly throughout the movement, the projection of the humeral head center at the glenoid plane remains at the central region of the glenoid surface. The model results qualitatively matched the trends observed in the literature and supports the consideration of the translational degrees of freedom to evaluate the joint contact mechanics.

Altering the strength of the muscles crossing the lower limb joints only affects knee joint reaction forces.

BACKGROUND: Generic musculoskeletal models based on literature data are often used to estimate joint reaction forces (JRFs) that otherwise could only be measured invasively. Estimated JRFs are sensitive to changes in maximum isometric force (Fiso) of the muscles, but these are normally simply scaled using a multiplicative coefficient. The impact of varying Fiso, or strength, of muscles crossing each lower limb joint on estimated JRFs has not been systematically explored in musculoskeletal models of the lower limb. RESEARCH QUESTION: How do alterations in the strength of joint-crossing muscles influence the lower limb JRF magnitudes computed through a generic musculoskeletal model? METHODS: By modifying Fiso of muscles crossing hip, knee, ankle, or all joints at once up to ± 40% in 10% increments, thirty-two models were created to simulate the gait of a patient with an instrumented tibial prosthesis (5th Grand Challenge dataset). A standard workflow (inverse kinematics, static optimization, joint reaction analysis) was utilized to calculate JRFs. Both alterations in JRF magnitudes due to joint crossing muscles' strength modifications and their accuracy against in vivo knee loading measurements were quantified. RESULTS: The knee JRF was the most sensitive force to changes in the joint-crossing muscles' strength (variations ranging from -37.9 ± 0.5% to +37.9 ± 3.2%), while the hip and ankle JRFs were almost unaffected (maximum variation: +6.1%). Reducing the strength of knee and ankle-crossing muscles and intensifying the strength of hip-crossing muscles lowered the knee JRF. The knee JRF was best estimated (peak error: 0.42 ± 0.15 body weight, root mean squared error: 0.37 ± 0.06 body weight, coefficient of determination: 0.76 ± 0.10) by the model with -40% weakened knee-crossing muscles. SIGNIFICANCE: Altering strengths mainly affects knee JRF estimated with generic musculoskeletal models, suggesting that personalization of strength of joint-crossing muscles is required for accurate knee JRF estimations. Rehabilitation regimes meant to strengthen muscles crossing a joint should be carefully designed to avoid undesired effects on the other joints.

Comparison of the knee joint reaction force between individuals with and without acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture during walking.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament plays a significant role in knee joint stability. It is claimed that the incidence of knee osteoarthritis increases in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. The aim of this study was to evaluate the knee joints reaction force in ACL rupture group compared to normal subjects. METHOD: Fifteen patients with acute ACL rupture and 15 healthy subjects participated in this study. The ground reaction force (GRF) and kinematic data were collected at a sampling rate of 120 Hz during level-ground walking. Spatiotemporal parameters, joint angles, muscle forces and moments, and joint reaction force (JRF) of lower extremity were analyzed by OpenSIM software. RESULTS: The hip, knee and ankle joints reaction force at loading response and push-off intervals of the stance phase during walking was significantly higher in individuals with ACL rupture compared to healthy controls (p value < 0.05). Walking velocity (p value < 0.001), knee (p value = 0.065) and ankle (p value = 0.001) range of motion in the sagittal plane were significantly lower in the patients with ACL rupture compared to healthy subjects. The mean value of vertical GRF in the mid-stance, the peak of the hip adduction moment in loading response and push-off phases, the hip abductor, knee flexor and vastus intermedius part of quadriceps muscle forces were significantly higher compared to healthy subjects (p < 0.05) while vastus medialis and vastus lateralis produced significantly lower force (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Based on results of this study, lower limb JRF was higher in those with ACL rupture compared to healthy subjects may be due to the compensatory mechanisms used by this group of subjects. An increase in knee JRF in patients with ACL rupture may be the reason for the high incidence of knee OA.

Comparison of Hip and Low Back Loads between Normal Gait, Axillary Crutch Ambulation and Walking with a Hands-free Crutch in a Healthy Population.

BACKGROUND: Instead of using axillary crutches, using a hands-free crutch (HFC) has been associated with higher functional outcome scores. However, hip and back pain have been reported as side effects. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to compare range of motion and joint reaction forces at the hip and low back between HFC walking, normal walking, and standard crutch walking. It was hypothesized that hip joint reaction forces and low back joint reaction forces would be higher with HFC walking compared with normal walking and axillary crutch walking. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled Laboratory Study. METHODS: Using 3D motion analysis and force plates, kinematics and ground reaction forces were measured in 12 healthy subjects during gait, crutch ambulation and HFC walking. Gait speed, hip and trunk range of motion, and hip and low back reaction forces, were compared using repeated-measures ANOVA. RESULTS: Gait speed during HFC ambulation was reduced 33% compared to crutch ambulation (P<0.001) and 44% compared to normal gait (p<0.001). Hip range of motion was reduced during both crutch conditions compared to gait (p<0.001). Trunk range of motion was greatest during HFC walking compared to both gait and crutch ambulation (p<0.001). Peak hip joint reaction force during HFC walking was 11% lower than during gait (p=0.026) and 30% lower than during crutch walking (p<0.001). Peak low back reaction force during HFC walking was 18% higher than during gait (p=0.032) but not different than during crutch walking. CONCLUSION: Hip joint reaction forces during HFC walking did not exceed those during gait or axillary crutch ambulation. However, a reduction in hip motion using the HFC was associated with increases in trunk motion and low-back loading. These could be a cause for reports of low-back pain accompanying HFC usage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Influence of rotator cuff integrity on loading and kinematics before and after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty has become a very common procedure for shoulder joint replacement, even for scenarios where an anatomical reconstruction would traditionally be used. Our hypothesis is that implanting a reverse prosthesis with a functional rotator cuff may lead to higher joint reaction force (JRF) and have a negative impact on the prosthesis. Available motion capture data during anterior flexion was input to a finite-element musculoskeletal shoulder model, and muscle activations were computed using inverse dynamics. Simulations were carried out for the intact joint as well as for various types of rotator cuff tears: superior (supraspinatus), superior-anterior (supraspinatus and subscapularis), and superior-posterior (supraspinatus, infraspinatus and teres minor). Each rotator cuff tear condition was repeated after shifting the humerus and the glenohumeral joint center of rotation to represent the effect of a reverse prosthesis. Changes in compressive, shear, and total JRF were analyzed. The model compared favorably to in vivo JRF measurements, and existing clinical and biomechanical knowledge. Implanting a reverse prosthesis with a functional rotator cuff or with an isolated supraspinatus tear led to more than 2 times higher compressive JRF than with massive rotator cuff tears (superior-anterior or superior-posterior), while the shear force remained comparable. The total JRF increased more than 1.5 times. While a lower shear to compressive ratio may reduce the risk of glenosphere loosening, higher JRF might increase the risk for other failure modes such as fracture or polyethylene wear of the reverse prosthesis.

Dysplastic hip anatomy alters muscle moment arm lengths, lines of action, and contributions to joint reaction forces during gait.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is characterized by abnormal bony anatomy, which causes detrimental hip joint loading and leads to secondary osteoarthritis. Hip joint loading depends, in part, on muscle-induced joint reaction forces (JRFs), and therefore, is influenced by hip muscle moment arm lengths (MALs) and lines of action (LoAs). The current study used subject-specific musculoskeletal models and in-vivo motion analysis to quantify the effects of DDH bony anatomy on dynamic muscle MALs, LoAs, and their contributions to JRF peaks during early (~17%) and late-stance (~52%) of gait. Compared to healthy hips (N = 15, 16-39 y/o), the abductor muscles in patients with untreated DDH (N = 15, 16-39 y/o) had smaller abduction MALs (e.g. anterior gluteus medius, 35.3 vs. 41.6 mm in early stance, 45.4 vs. 52.6 mm late stance, p ≤ 0.01) and more medially-directed LoAs. Abduction-adduction and rotation MALs also differed for major hip flexors such as rectus femoris and iliacus. The altered MALs in DDH corresponded to higher hip abductor forces, medial JRFs (1.26 vs. 0.87 × BW early stance, p = 0.03), and resultant JRFs (5.71 vs. 4.97 × BW late stance, p = 0.05). DDH anatomy not only affected hip muscle force generation in the primary plane of function, but also their out-of-plane mechanics, which collectively elevated JRFs. Overall, hip muscle MALs and their contributions to JRFs were significantly altered by DDH bony anatomy. Therefore, to better understand the mechanisms of joint degeneration and improve the efficacy of treatments for DDH, the dynamic anatomy-force relationships and multi-planar functions of the whole hip musculature must be collectively considered.

Evaluation of musculoskeletal modelling parameters of the shoulder complex during humeral abduction above 90°.

Based on electromyographic data and force measurements within the shoulder joint, there is an indication that muscle and resulting joint reaction forces keep increasing over an abduction angle of 90°. In inverse dynamics models, no single parameter could be attributed to simulate this force behaviour accordingly. The aim of this work is to implement kinematic, kinetic and muscle model modifications to an existing model of the shoulder (AnyBody™) and assess their single and combined effects during abduction up to 140° humeral elevation. The kinematics and the EMG activity of 10 test subjects were measured during humeral abduction. Six modifications were implemented in the model: alternative wrapping of the virtual deltoid muscle elements, utilization of a three element Hill model, strength scaling, motion capture driven clavicle elevation/protraction, translation of the GH joint in dependency of the acting forces and an alteration of the scapula/clavicle rhythm. From the six modifications, 16 different combinations were considered. Parameter combinations with the Hill model changed the resultant GH joint reaction force and led to an increase in force during abduction of the humerus above 90°. Under the premise of muscle activities and forces within the GH joint rising after 90° of humeral abduction, we propose that the Hill type muscle model is a crucial parameter for accurately modelling the shoulder. Furthermore, the outcome of this study indicates that the Hill model induces the co-contraction of the muscles of the shoulder without the need of an additional stability criterion for an inverse dynamics approach.

Development of a Knee Joint CT-FEM Model in Load Response of the Stance Phase During Walking Using Muscle Exertion, Motion Analysis, and Ground Reaction Force Data.

Background and objectives: There are no reports on articular stress distribution during walking based on any computed tomography (CT)-finite element model (CT-FEM). This study aimed to develop a calculation model of the load response (LR) phase, the most burdensome phase on the knee, during walking using the finite element method of quantitative CT images. Materials and Methods: The right knee of a 43-year-old man who had no history of osteoarthritis or surgeries of the knee was examined. An image of the knee was obtained using CT and the extension position image was converted to the flexion angle image in the LR phase. The bone was composed of heterogeneous materials. The ligaments were made of truss elements; therefore, they do not generate strain during expansion or contraction and do not affect the reaction force or pressure. The construction of the knee joint included material properties of the ligament, cartilage, and meniscus. The extensor and flexor muscles were calculated and set as the muscle exercise tension around the knee joint. Ground reaction force was vertically applied to suppress the rotation of the knee, and the thigh was restrained. Results: An FEM was constructed using a motion analyzer, floor reaction force meter, and muscle tractive force calculation. In a normal knee, the equivalent stress and joint contact reaction force in the LR phase were distributed over a wide area on the inner upper surface of the femur and tibia. Conclusions: We developed a calculation model in the LR phase of the knee joint during walking using a CT-FEM. Methods to evaluate the heteromorphic risk, mechanisms of transformation, prevention of knee osteoarthritis, and treatment may be developed using this model.

The association between periacetabular osteotomy reorientation and hip joint reaction forces in two subgroups of acetabular dysplasia.

Acetabular dysplasia is primarily characterized by an altered acetabular geometry that results in deficient coverage of the femoral head, and is a known cause of hip osteoarthritis. Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a surgical reorientation of the acetabulum to normalize coverage, yet its effect on joint loading is unknown. Our objective was to establish how PAO, simulated with a musculoskeletal model and probabilistic analysis, alters hip joint reaction forces (JRF) in two representative patients of two different acetabular dysplasia subgroups: anterolateral and posterolateral coverage deficiencies. PAO reorientation was simulated within the musculoskeletal model by adding three surgical degrees of freedom to the acetabulum relative to the pelvis (acetabular adduction, acetabular extension, medial translation of the hip joint center). Monte Carlo simulations were performed to generate 2000 unique PAO reorientations for each patient; from which 99% confidence bounds and sensitivity factors were calculated to assess the influence of input variability (PAO reorientation) on output (hip JRF) during gait. Our results indicate that reorientation of the acetabulum alters the lines of action of the hip musculature. Specifically, as the hip joint center was medialized, the moment arm of the hip abductor muscles was increased, which in turn increased the mechanical force-generating capacity of these muscles and decreased joint loading. Independent of subgroup, hip JRF was most sensitive to hip joint center medialization. Results from this study improve understanding of how PAO reorientation affects muscle function differently dependent upon acetabular dysplasia subgrouping and can be used to inform more targeted surgical interventions.

Patellofemoral Joint Loading During Single-Leg Hopping Exercises.

CONTEXT: Single-leg hopping is used to assess a dynamic knee stability. Patellofemoral pain is often experienced during these exercises, and different cadences of jumping are often used in rehabilitation for those with patellofemoral pain. No studies to date have examined patellofemoral joint loading during single-leg hopping exercise with different hopping cadences. OBJECTIVE: To determine if single-leg hopping at 2 different cadences (50 and 100 hops per minute [HPM]) leads to a significant difference in patellofemoral joint loading variables. SETTING: University research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five healthy college-aged females (age 22.3 [1.8] y, height 171.4 [6.3] cm, weight 67.4 [9.5] kg, Tegner Activity Scale 4.75 [1.75]) participated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic data were measured using a 15-camera motion capture system and force platform. Static optimization was used to calculate muscle forces and then used in a musculoskeletal model to determine patellofemoral joint stress (PFJS), patellofemoral joint reaction force (PFJRF), quadriceps force (QF), and PFJRF loading rate, during the first and last 50% of stance phase. RESULTS: Greater maximal PFJRF occurred at 100 HPM, whereas greater PFJRF loading rate occurred at 50 HPM. However, overall peak QF and peak PFJS were not different between the 2 cadences. At 50 HPM, there was greater PFJS, PFJRF, peak PFJRF loading rate, and peak QF during the first 50% of stance when compared with the last 50%. CONCLUSION: Training at 50 HPM may reduce PFJRF and PFJRF loading rate, but not PFJS or QF. Patellofemoral joint loading variables had significantly higher values during the first half of the stance phase at the 50 HPM cadence. This may be important with training individuals with patellofemoral pain.

In Vivo Measurement of Thumb Joint Reaction Forces During Smartphone Manipulation: A Biomechanical Analysis.

The relationship between arthritis or repetitive stress injuries (RSIs) in thumbs and rapidly increasing hours of smartphone usage is not fully elucidated. We evaluated axial joint reaction forces (AJRFs) and thumb torques in 19 healthy subjects performing typical smartphone tasks, which included tapping, tap game, and swiping. We measured force and torque when a subject tapped or swiped the panel of the smartphone and analyzed the motions of each joint using surface markers and motion capture systems. We calculated AJRFs and torques on each thumb joint using inverse dynamics. The results were then compared with representative activities such as computer keyboard typing and handwriting. The mean AJRFs/torques at the thumb carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) while tapping the smartphone and tap gaming were 12.5 N/95.5 N mm and 21.1 N/187.21 N mm, respectively. AJRFs and torques were significantly higher during tap gaming activities than during simple tapping subtasks (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively). Compared with those during computer keyboard typing, the mean AJRFs and torques at the CMCJ during smartphone tapping was 3 (p = 0.075) and 1.4 times (p = 0.680) larger, respectively. Considering the rapidly increasing dependency on smartphones in our daily lives, long-term exposure of the thumb to repetitive AJRFs and torques may lead to an acceleration of arthritis or aggravation of RSIs in thumbs. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:2437-2444, 2019.

Mechanical misconceptions: Have we lost the "mechanics" in "sports biomechanics"?

Biomechanics principally stems from two disciplines, mechanics and biology. However, both the application and language of the mechanical constructs are not always adhered to when applied to biological systems, which can lead to errors and misunderstandings within the scientific literature. Here we address three topics that seem to be common points of confusion and misconception, with a specific focus on sports biomechanics applications: (1) joint reaction forces as they pertain to loads actually experienced by biological joints; (2) the partitioning of scalar quantities into directional components; and (3) weight and gravity alteration. For each topic, we discuss how mechanical concepts have been commonly misapplied in peer-reviewed publications, the consequences of those misapplications, and how biomechanics, exercise science, and other related disciplines can collectively benefit by more carefully adhering to and applying concepts of classical mechanics.

Musculoskeletal models with generic and subject-specific geometry estimate different joint biomechanics in dysplastic hips.

Optimizing the geometric complexity of musculoskeletal models is important for reliable yet feasible estimation of joint biomechanics. This study investigated the effects of subject-specific model geometry on hip joint reaction forces (JRFs) and muscle forces in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and healthy controls. For nine DDH and nine control subjects, three models were created with increasingly subject-specific pelvis geometry, hip joint center locations and muscle attachments. Hip JRFs and muscle forces during a gait cycle were compared among the models. For DDH subjects, resultant JRFs from highly specific models including subject-specific pelvis geometry, joint locations and muscle attachments were not significantly different compared to models using generic geometry in early stance, but were significantly higher in late stance (p = 0.03). Estimates from moderately specific models using CT-informed scaling of generic pelvis geometry were not significantly different from low specificity models using generic geometry scaled with skin markers. For controls, resultant JRFs in early stance from highly specific models were significantly lower than moderate and low specificity models (p ≤ 0.02) with no significant differences in late stance. Inter-model JRF differences were larger for DDH subjects than controls. Inter-model differences for JRF components and muscle forces were similar to resultant JRFs. Incorporating subject-specific pelvis geometry significantly affects JRF and muscle force estimates in both DDH and control groups, which may be especially important for reliable estimation of pathomechanics in dysplastic hips.

Spring ligament tear decreases static stability of the ankle joint.

BACKGROUND: Spring ligament tear is often found in advanced adult acquired flatfoot deformity and its reconstruction in conjunction with the deltoid ligament has been proposed to restore the tibiotalar and talonavicular joint stability. The aim of the present study is to determine the effect of spring ligament injury and subsequent reconstruction on static joint reactive force using a non-invasive method of measurement. METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen human cadaveric lower legs were disarticulated at the knee joint. Static joint reactive force of the tibiotalar and talonavicular joint were measured at baseline, after spring ligament injury, and after ligament reconstruction. Reconstruction consisted of a forked semitendinosis allograft with dual limbs to reconstruct the tibionavicular and tibiocalcaneal ligaments. FINDINGS: The mean baseline joint reactive force of the tibiotalar and talonavicular joints were 37.2 N + 8.1 N and 13.4 N + 4.2 N, respectively. The spring ligament injury model resulted in a significant 29% decrease in tibiotalar joint reactive force. Reconstruction of the tibionavicular limb resulted in a significant increase in tibiotalar and talonavicular joint reactive force compared to those seen in the injury state. Furthermore, the addition of the tibiocalcaneal limb significantly increased tibiotalar joint reactive force compared to those results obtained from the injury state and the tibionavicular limb alone. INTERPRETATION: This is the first study to demonstrate diminished tibiotalar static joint reactive force in a spring ligament injury model with subsequent joint reactive force restoration using two-limbed reconstruction of the deltoid and spring ligament. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Biomechanical Study.

Estimation of knee joint reaction force based on the plantar flexion resistance of an ankle-foot orthosis during gait.

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of changing the plantar flexion resistance of an ankle-foot orthosis on knee joint reaction and knee muscle forces. Furthermore, the influence of an ankle-foot orthosis with an over-plantar flexion resistance function on knee joint reaction force was verified. [Participants and Methods] Ten healthy adult males walked under the following three conditions: (1) no ankle-foot orthosis, and with ankle-foot orthoses with (2) a strong and (3) a weak plantar flexion resistance (ankle-foot orthosis conditions). The knee flexion angle, quadricep muscle force, hamstring muscle force, and knee joint reaction force during the stance phase were measured using a motion analysis system, musculoskeletal model, and ankle-foot orthosis model. [Results] The peak knee joint reaction force, knee flexion angle, and quadricep muscle force in the early stance phase significantly increased in the strong plantar flexion resistance condition in comparison with the "no ankle-foot orthosis" condition. [Conclusion] Increased knee joint reaction force with over-plantar flexion resistance suggests that over-plantar flexion resistance causes various knee problems such as knee pain and knee osteoarthritis.