RESUMEN
Context: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of metabolic risk factors that predict cardiovascular disease. Previous studies suggested that MetS impaired clinical outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). Objective: To evaluate the effects of MetS on IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes in women without PCOS. Methods: This retrospective study collected 8539 eligible women without PCOS who came for their first cycle of IVF/ICSI to the Institute of Women, Children and Reproductive Health, Shandong University, from 2017 to 2020, including 1147 subjects in the MetS group and 7392 in the control group. The primary outcome was live birth. Secondary outcomes included other pregnancy outcomes and the risk of maternal and neonatal complications. Results: Women in the MetS group had a lower live birth rate (50.6% vs 54.9%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.87, 95% CI 0.75-1.00, P = .045) and higher risks of late miscarriage (5.8% vs 3.3%, aOR 1.52, 95% CI 1.02-2.27, P = .041), gestational diabetes mellitus (13.7% vs 7.0%, aOR 1.84, 95% CI 1.30-2.60, P = .001), hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (7.8% vs 3.5%, aOR 1.79, 95% CI 1.14-2.83, P = .012), and preterm birth (9.0% vs 4.4%, aOR 2.03, 95% CI 1.33-3.08, P = .001). Singleton newborns in the MetS group were at higher risk of large for gestational age (33.3% vs 20.5%, aOR 1.66, 95% CI (1.31-2.13), P < .001) but at lower risk of small for gestational age (2.7% vs 6.2%, aOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.25-0.90, P = .023). Conclusion: MetS was associated with adverse IVF/ICSI outcomes in women without PCOS.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This retrospective multicenter cohort study aimed to investigate the impact of diazepam administration during embryo transfer on reproductive outcomes, focusing primarily on the live birth rate. Secondary outcomes included the positive beta-hCG rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, and preterm birth rate. METHODS: Data from 5607 embryo transfers, encompassing 465 cases with diazepam administration, were retrospectively analyzed. The study included single blastocyst transfers from 12 clinics in Portugal and Spain between January 2015 and December 2022. RESULTS: Comparison of reproductive outcomes between patients receiving diazepam and those who did not showed no statistically significant differences. Positive beta-hCG rates (60.8% non-diazepam vs. 60.4% diazepam, p = 0.92, adjusted p = 0.32) and clinical pregnancy rates (45.6% non-diazepam vs. 46.2% diazepam, p = 0.81, adjusted p = 0.11) were comparable. Miscarriage rates (11.0% diazepam vs. 9.3% non-diazepam, p = 0.25, adjusted p = 0.26) and ectopic pregnancy rates (0.9% diazepam vs. 0.1% non-diazepam, p = 0.1, adjusted p = 0.20) were similar. Live birth rates (36.3% non-diazepam vs. 35.3% diazepam, p = 0.69, adjusted p = 0.82) and prematurity rates (0.3% non-diazepam vs. 0% diazepam, p > 0.99, adjusted p = 0.99) also exhibited no statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results, diazepam administration during embryo transfer did not show a discernible impact on reproductive outcomes, including live birth rates, suggesting its limited effectiveness in enhancing success.
RESUMEN
Introduction: The optimal dosage of recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hLH) and its impact on endometrial thickness (EMT) when administered alongside recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer are uncertain, which formed the aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis. Method: A search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, CNKI, and Wanfang from its inception to 10 July 2023. Twenty-seven Randomized controlled trials comparing r-hFSH/r-hLH co-treatment with r-hFSH alone during in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET) were included. Pooled odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous data and mean differences (MD) for continuous data, with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI), were generated. Meta-analysis employed fixed-effect or random-effect models based on heterogeneity, using Q-test and I2-index calculations. The main outcomes included EMT on trigger day, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR). Results: r-hFSH/r-hLH significantly increased EMT on trigger day (MD = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.11-0.42; I2 = 13%), but reduced oocyte number (MD = -0.60; 95% CI, -1.07 to -0.14; I2 = 72%) and high-quality embryos (MD = -0.76; 95% CI, -1.41 to -0.10; I2 = 94%) than r-hFSH alone, more pronounced with the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist long protocol. A subgroup analysis showed r-hLH at 75 IU/day increased CPR (OR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02-1.49; I2 = 16%) and EMT on trigger day (MD = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.19-0.61; I2 = 0%). Participants ≥35 years of age exhibited decreased retrieved oocytes (MD = -1.26; 95% CI, -1.78 to -0.74; I2 = 29%), but an increase in EMT on trigger day (MD = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.11-0.42; I2 = 29%). Conclusion: r-hFSH/r-hLH during COS significantly improved EMT compared to r-hFSH alone. An r-hLH dose of 75 IU/day may be considered for optimal pregnancy outcomes, which still require further clinical studies to support this dosing regime. Systematic Review Registration: [www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO], identifier [CRD42023454584].
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) on first transfer live birth rate (LBR) and cumulative LBR (CLBR) in donor oocyte IVF cycles. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of the SART CORS database. SUBJECTS: 11,348 fresh and 7,214 frozen-thawed donor oocyte IVF cycles were analyzed. EXPOSURE: The first reported donor stimulation cycle per patient between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2015, and all linked embryo transfer cycles between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2016, were included in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: LBR was compared for patients using fresh and frozen-thawed donor oocytes, with or without PGT-A. Logistic regression models were adjusted for age, body mass index, gravidity, infertility etiology, and prior IVF cycles. RESULTS: Among patients who had blastocysts available for transfer or PGT-A, use of PGT-A was associated with a decreased first transfer LBR (46.9 vs 53.2%, p <0.001) and CLBR (58.4 vs 66.6%, p <0.001) in fresh oocyte donor cycles compared with no PGT-A. LBR in frozen-thawed oocyte donor cycles with PGT-A were nominally higher than those without PGTA (48.3% vs. 40.5%) but were not statistically significant in multivariable logistic regression models (p=0.14). Early pregnancy loss was not significantly different with and without PGT-A. Multiple gestation, preterm birth, and low birthweight infants were all reduced with addition of PGT-A in fresh donor oocyte cycles, though these outcomes were not significantly different when comparing single embryo transfers in fresh oocyte cycles and also not significantly different among frozen-thawed donor oocyte cycles. CONCLUSION: PGT-A in fresh oocyte donor cycles was associated with decreased LBR and CLBR, while effects on frozen-thawed oocyte donor cycles were clinically negligible. Obstetrical benefits associated with PGT-A in fresh donor cycles appear linked to increased single embryo transfer.
RESUMEN
In vitro maturation (IVM) of oocytes represents an assisted reproductive technique that involves the minimal or absence of ovarian stimulation and is beneficial to specific groups of patients. It is based on the collection of immature cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) from antral follicles, which are cultured in vitro until they reach the metaphase II (MII) stage. Once maturation is completed, IVM oocytes are normally fertilized, as during a conventional IVF protocol. On the other hand, ovarian rejuvenation through the intraovarian platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection represents an innovative procedure intended to restore ovarian fertility and development, and it is used to enhance ovarian stimulation outcomes. Here, we report a case of a 47-year-old woman who underwent an assisted reproductive technology cycle (ART) with PRP injection and IVM, which resulted in a successful pregnancy.
RESUMEN
STUDY QUESTION: Can we develop a prediction model for the chance of a live birth following the transfer of an embryo created using donated oocytes? SUMMARY ANSWER: Three primary models that included patient, past treatment, and cycle characteristics were developed using Australian data to predict the chance of a live birth following the transfer of an embryo created using donated oocytes; these models were well-calibrated to the population studied, achieved reasonable predictive power and generalizability when tested on New Zealand data. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Nearly 9% of ART embryo transfer cycles performed globally use embryos created using donated oocytes. This percentage rises to one-quarter and one-half in same-sex couples and women aged over 45 years, respectively. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This study uses population-based Australian clinical registry data comprising 9384 embryo transfer cycles that occurred between 2015 and 2021 for model development, with an external validation cohort of 1493 New Zealand embryo transfer cycles. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Three prediction models were compared that incorporated patient characteristics, but differed in whether they considered use of prior autologous treatment factors and current treatment parameters. We internally validated the models on Australian data using grouped cross-validation and reported several measures of model discrimination and calibration. Variable importance was measured through calculating the change in predictive performance that resulted from variable permutation. The best-performing model was externally validated on data from New Zealand. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The best-performing model had an internal validation AUC-ROC of 0.60 and Brier score of 0.20, and external validation AUC-ROC of 0.61 and Brier score of 0.23. While these results indicate â¼15% less discriminatory ability compared to models assessed on an autologous cohort from the same population the performance of the models was clearly statistically significantly better than random, demonstrated generalizability, and was well-calibrated to the population studied. The most important variables for predicting the chance of a live birth were the oocyte donor age, the number of prior oocyte recipient embryo transfer cycles, whether the transferred embryo was cleavage or blastocyst stage and oocyte recipient age. Of lesser importance were the oocyte-recipient parity, whether donor or partner sperm was used, the number of prior autologous embryo transfer cycles and the number of embryos transferred. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The models had relatively weak discrimination suggesting further features need to be added to improve their predictive power. Variation in donor oocyte cohorts across countries due to differences such as whether anonymous and compensated donation are allowed may necessitate the models be recalibrated prior to application in non-Australian cohorts. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: These results confirm the well-established importance of oocyte age and ART treatment history as the key prognostic factors in predicting treatment outcomes. One of the developed models has been incorporated into a consumer-facing website (YourIVFSuccess.com.au/Estimator) to allow patients to obtain personalized estimates of their chance of success using donor oocytes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This research was funded by the Australian government as part of the Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF) Emerging Priorities and Consumer Driven Research initiative: EPCD000007. L.R. declares personal consulting fees from Abbott and Merck, lecture fees from Abbott, receipt of an educational grant from Merck, past presidency of the Fertility Society of Australia & New Zealand and World Endometriosis Society and being a minor shareholder in Monash IVF Group (ASX:MVF). G.M.C. declares receipt of Australian government grant funding for the research study and the development and maintenance of the YourIVFSuccess website. O.F., J.N., and A.P. report no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
RESUMEN
Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), widely utilized in various industries, may pose potential reproductive well-being risks. However, the research on the impact of PFAS exposures on pregnancy and live birth rates remains scarce. To address this gap, we conducted a cross-sectional study using the data from the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) collected between 2013 and 2018. We focused on six PFAS compounds measured in the serum of women aged 20 to 50 years, employing the Poisson regression, Quantile G-composition (Qgcomp), and Weighted Quantile Sum (WQS) regression models. Adjusting for age, racial/ethnic origin, educational level, marital status, family income, body mass index (BMI), menarche age, birth control pill use, and other female hormone consumption, the Poisson regression identified significant negative associations between the individual PFAS exposures and pregnancy and live birth numbers (p < 0.05 for all 24 null hypotheses for which the slope of the trend line is zero). The Qgcomp analysis indicated that a one-quartile increase in the mixed PFAS exposures was associated with reductions of 0.09 (95% CI: -0.15, -0.03) in the pregnancy numbers and 0.12 (95% CI: -0.19, -0.05) in the live birth numbers. Similarly, the WQS analysis revealed that a unit increase in the WQS index corresponded to decreases of 0.14 (95% CI: -0.20, -0.07) in the pregnancy numbers and 0.14 (95% CI: -0.21, -0.06) in the live birth numbers. Among the six specific PFAS compounds we studied, perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) had the most negative association with the pregnancy and live birth numbers. In conclusion, our findings suggest that PFAS exposures are associated with lower pregnancy and live birth numbers among women of reproductive age.
RESUMEN
When considering the typical lesions associated with endometriosis, such as endometriomas, and pelvic adherences involving the tubes, it is very clear how this pathology may impair both natural and assisted reproductive technology (ART) fertility. It may be more difficult for clinicians to recognize that endometriosis can reduce female fertility potential through other mechanisms which may be independent of direct damage to ovarian reserve and tubal function. The most recent clinical studies have shown that endometriosis is associated with increased risk of infertility, independent of the type of endometriosis (ovarian, peritoneal and deep endometriosis). In the IVF setting, the cumulative live birth rate in women with endometriosis has been reported to be significantly lower compared with women without endometriosis. Endometriosis is a complex, multifactorial condition that encompasses not only the presence of endometriotic lesions, but also involves women's sexuality, uterine and ovarian compartment. Endometriosis should always be considered a severe risk factor for infertility and ART failure.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Study objectives included the development of a practical nomogram for predicting live birth following frozen-thawed embryo transfers in ovulatory women. METHODS: Totally, 2884 patients with regular menstrual cycles in our center were retrospectively enrolled. In an 8:2 ratio, we randomly assigned patients to training and validation cohorts. Then we identified risk factors by multivariate logistic regression and constructed nomogram. Finally, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, calibration curve and decision curve analysis were performed to assess the calibration and discriminative ability of the nomogram. RESULTS: We identified five variables which were related to live birth, including age, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), protocol of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET), stage of embryos and amount of high-quality embryos. We then constructed nomograms that predict the probabilities of live birth by using those five parameters. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (ROC) showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for live birth was 0.666 (95% CI: 0.644-0.688) in the training cohort. The AUC in the subsequent validation cohorts was 0.669 (95% CI, 0.625-0.713). The clinical practicability of this nomogram was demonstrated through calibration curve analysis and decision curve analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our nomogram provides a visual and simple tool in predicting live birth in ovulatory women who received FET. It could also provide advice and guidance for physicians and patients on decision-making during the FET procedure.
Asunto(s)
Criopreservación , Transferencia de Embrión , Nacimiento Vivo , Nomogramas , Humanos , Femenino , Transferencia de Embrión/estadística & datos numéricos , Transferencia de Embrión/métodos , Nacimiento Vivo/epidemiología , Embarazo , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hormona Antimülleriana/sangre , Curva ROC , Ovulación , Factores de Riesgo , Fertilización In Vitro/estadística & datos numéricos , Fertilización In Vitro/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether industry payments to physicians are associated with a difference in assisted reproductive technology practices and outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Assisted reproductive technology centers. PATIENT(S): Patients undergoing asissted reproduction. INTERVENTION(S): Industry payments reported to the Open Payments 2020 database. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The live birth rate, frozen embryo transfer (FET) rate, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) rate, preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) rate, and percentage of patients aged >40 years were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2020 database. Linear regression analysis was performed comparing the percentage of physicians per center receiving industry payments to clinic-level outcomes. RESULT(S): A total of 873 reproductive endocrinology and infertility physicians received payments in the 2020 database. At least one physician received a payment in 80.5% (437/543) of in vitro fertilization centers. Of 1,724 reproductive endocrinology and infertility physicians, 873 (50.6%) received at least one payment in 2020. The live birth, ICSI, FET, and PGT rates and percentage of patients aged >40 years did not significantly differ between centers by percentage of physicians receiving industry payments. However, in the subanalysis of 99 large centers (defined as ≥5 physicians), each increase in the percentage of physicians receiving industry payments was associated with increases of 0.20% (95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.39) and 0.14% (95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.24) in the PGT and FET rates, respectively. The live birth, ICSI rates and percentage of patients aged >40 years were not associated with increased industry payment rates to physicians. CONCLUSION(S): Industry payments were not associated with differences in in vitro fertilization center outcomes overall. However, large centers with more physicians receiving industry payments may be more likely to use additional procedures such as PGT and FET, without improvement in the final outcomes such as the live birth rate. Further research is needed to determine whether these differences reflect the industry payment influence vs. individual center/provider practice habits in larger practices.
RESUMEN
Background and Objectives: Fertilized zygotes normally display two pronuclei (PN), but abnormal fertilization patterns (0, 1 or >2PN) are observed daily in IVF labs. Multiple PN zygotes (>2) are generally discarded due to an increased risk of aneuploidy. However, the decision to transfer or not transfer 1PN-derived embryos remains controversial. The aims of our study were to analyze the neonatal outcomes of fresh or frozen-thawed embryos derived from 1PN zygotes, and to evaluate the influence of the fertilization method. Materials and Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from cycles performed between January 2018 and December 2022. Fresh cycles were analyzed for the comparative fate of 1PN zygotes (n = 1234) following conventional in vitro fertilization (cIVF; n = 648) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI; n = 586), as well as the results of the 64 transfers of 1PN-derived embryos (pregnancy rate (PR) and neonatal outcomes). This pregnancy follow-up was also applied to 167 transfers of frozen-thawed 1PN-derived embryos. Results: In fresh cycles, 46% of the 1PN zygotes in the cIVF group developed into embryos of sufficient quality to be transferred or frozen (day 3 or 5/6). This rate was lower in the fresh ICSI cycles (33%). Blastulation rate was also significantly higher in the cIVF group (44%) in comparison to the ICSI group (20%). The fresh single embryo transfers (32 per group) allowed seven pregnancies in the cIVF group (PR = 21.9%) as compared to four pregnancies in the ICSI group (PR = 12.5%). In the cIVF group, five deliveries of healthy newborns were achieved, but only one in the ICSI group. In frozen/thawed cycles, 36 pregnancies were obtained out of the 167 transfers. A non-significant difference was observed between embryos derived from cIVF cycles (PR = 26%) and ICSI cycles (PR = 16%) with 18 and 8 healthy babies born, respectively. Conclusions: We observed better outcomes for 1PN zygotes in cIVF cycles in comparison to ICSI cycles. Our center policy to transfer good-quality 1PN-derived embryos allowed the birth of 32 healthy babies.
Asunto(s)
Criopreservación , Transferencia de Embrión , Cigoto , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Embarazo , Transferencia de Embrión/métodos , Adulto , Cigoto/fisiología , Criopreservación/métodos , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Resultado del Embarazo , Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas/métodosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aimed to examine the correlation between different dominant follicle proportions (DFPs) and outcomes of in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) among patients classified under POSEIDON Groups 3 and 4, who underwent gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocols. Additionally, it sought to determine the optimal DFP threshold for trigger timing. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients classified under POSEIDON Groups 3 (n = 593) and 4 (n = 563) who underwent GnRH-ant protocols for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) between 2016 and 2022. These patients were categorized into two groups based on their DFPs, defined as the ratio of ≥ 18-mm dominant follicles to ≥ 12-mm follicles on the trigger day (DFP ≤ 40% and DFP ≥ 40%). Statistical analyses, including restricted cubic spline (RCS) and multivariate logistic regression, were employed to assess the relationship between DFP and IVF/ICSI outcomes. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics of patients were similar across groups. In POSEIDON Groups 3 and 4, DFP > 40 was associated with a significant decrease in the number (No.) of oocytes retrieved, cleaved embryos, and available embryos. Moreover, following the GnRH-ant cycle, the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in fresh embryo transfer (ET) were notably reduced in the DFP > 40 group compared with the DFP ≤ 40 group, whereas no significant differences were observed in the pregnancy outcomes of the first frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) between the groups. In POSEIDON Group 3, the cumulative clinical pregnancy rate (CCPR) and cumulative live birth rate (CLRB) were significantly higher in the DFP ≤ 40 subgroup than in the DFP > 40 subgroup, with a notable decrease in CLRB observed with increasing DFP levels. However, in POSEIDON Group 4, no significant differences in CCPR and CLRB were found between the groups. Logistic regression analysis identified age and the No. of oocytes retrieved as pivotal factors influencing CLRB in Group 4. CONCLUSION: For patients in POSEIDON Group 3, maintaining a DFP ≤ 40 mm is crucial to achieve optimal laboratory and pregnancy outcomes by avoiding delayed triggering. However, for patients in POSEIDON Group 4, age remains a critical factor influencing CLRB regardless of DFP, although a higher No. of oocytes retrieved and available embryos with DFP ≤ 40 is beneficial.
Asunto(s)
Fertilización In Vitro , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina , Folículo Ovárico , Inducción de la Ovulación , Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas , Humanos , Femenino , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas/métodos , Embarazo , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Folículo Ovárico/efectos de los fármacos , Inducción de la Ovulación/métodos , Índice de Embarazo , Pronóstico , Antagonistas de Hormonas/uso terapéutico , Resultado del EmbarazoRESUMEN
Introduction: In the realm of natural frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles, the application of luteal phase support (LPS) is a prevalent practice, primarily due to its beneficial impact on reproductive outcomes. Among the various LPS medications, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is one that exerts its function on both the corpus luteum and the endometrium. Objective: To evaluate the effect of hCG administration as LPS on reproductive outcomes in natural FET cycles. Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort analysis conducted at a tertiary care hospital. It included women who underwent natural FET treatment from January 2018 to December 2022. Participants were divided into the hCG LPS group and the non-hCG LPS group on the basis of whether they used hCG as LPS after blastocyst transfer. The primary outcome was the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. The secondary outcomes included the early miscarriage rate (before 12th gestational week) and total miscarriage rate. Results: A total of 4762 women were included in the analysis, and 1910 received hCG LPS and 2852 received no hCG LPS (control group). In the general cohort, the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in the hCG LPS group were significantly lower than those in the control group (63.82% vs 66.41%, aOR 0.872, 95% CI 0.765-0.996, P=0.046; 53.98% vs 57.15%, aOR 0.873, 95% CI 0.766-0.991, P=0.035, respectively). The early miscarriage and total miscarriage rates were similar between the two groups. In a subgroup analysis, in women who received an hCG trigger, there was no significant difference in the clinical pregnancy rate or live birth rate between the two groups. However, in women who ovulated spontaneously, the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in the hCG LPS group were significantly lower than those in the control group (60.99% vs 67.21%, aOR 0.786, 95% CI 0.652-0.946, P=0.011; 50.56% vs 57.63%, aOR 0.743, 95% CI 0.619-0.878, P=0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Among women undergoing natural cycle frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer, hCG LPS is associated with lower clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. Additionally, the adverse effect of hCG LPS is more pronounced in women who ovulate spontaneously.
Asunto(s)
Gonadotropina Coriónica , Criopreservación , Transferencia de Embrión , Fase Luteínica , Índice de Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Gonadotropina Coriónica/administración & dosificación , Gonadotropina Coriónica/uso terapéutico , Embarazo , Transferencia de Embrión/métodos , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Criopreservación/métodos , Fase Luteínica/efectos de los fármacos , Estudios de Cohortes , Nacimiento Vivo/epidemiología , Tasa de Natalidad , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Aborto Espontáneo/epidemiología , Resultado del EmbarazoRESUMEN
RESEARCH QUESTION: Do different timings of progesterone administration for day 5 and day 6 blastocysts affect the live birth rate (LBR) of artificial frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles? DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study included 1362 patients who underwent artificial FET cycles. The effects of 6 and 7 days of progesterone administration prior to blastocyst transfer on clinical outcomes were compared in day 5 and day 6 blastocysts. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were undertaken. RESULTS: In all patients, LBR was comparable between the two groups (51.8% versus 47.9%, Pâ¯=â¯0.165). For day 6 blastocysts, after adjusting for confounders, the 7-day progesterone regimen resulted in a significantly higher LBR (44.8% versus 36.4%, Pâ¯=â¯0.039, adjusted ORâ¯=â¯1.494, 95% CI 1.060-2.106) and lower pregnancy loss rate (15.4% versus 25.2%, Pâ¯=â¯0.031, adjusted ORâ¯=â¯0.472, 95% CI 0.260-0.856) compared with the 6-day progesterone regimen. For day 5 blastocysts, there were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes between the two regimens, but the rate of low birthweight was higher with the 7-day progesterone regimen than with the 6-day progesterone regimen (13.9% versus 6.7%, Pâ¯=â¯0.032). CONCLUSIONS: In all blastocyst analyses, no difference in LBR was found between the 6- and 7-day progesterone regimens in artificial FET cycles. For day 6 blastocysts, LBR was significantly higher with the 7-day progesterone regimen than with the 6-day progesterone regimen, whereas for day 5 blastocysts, pregnancy outcomes were comparable between the two regimens.
RESUMEN
Background: The global prevalence of infertility is 9%, with male factors potentially accounting for 40% to 60% of cases. Conventional treatments can be ineffective, invasive, costly, and linked to adverse effects and high risks. Previous studies have shown that, Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) can regulate the hypothalamus-pituitary-testis axis, improve sperm abnormalities and quality, mitigate oxidative stress, and decrease DNA fragmentation index (DFI). Yet, the evidence backing the use of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) for treating male factor infertility lacks conviction due to study design limitations, and there remains a scarcity of studies on the live birth rate following CHM treatment for male factor infertility. Here, we describe the rationale and design of a randomized waitlist-controlled trial to evaluate the effect of CHM on the live birth rate among males with infertility. Methods: This study is a single-center, randomized, waitlist-controlled study. A total of 250 couples diagnosed with male factor infertility will be enrolled in this study and then randomly allocated into two groups in a 1:1 ratio. Male participants in CHM group (treatment group) will receive CHM once a day for 3 months. Male participants in the waitlist group (control group) will not receive any treatment for 3 months. After 3 months, participants in both groups need to be followed up for another 12 months. The primary outcome will be the live birth rate; secondary outcomes include semen quality parameters, DFI and pregnancy related outcomes. Safety will also be assessed. Discussion: The purpose of this trial is to explore the effects and safety of CHM on the live birth rate among couples dealing with male factor infertility. The outcome of this trial may provide a viable treatment option for male factor infertility. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2200064416. Registered on 7 October 2022, https://www.chictr.org.cn.
Asunto(s)
Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos , Infertilidad Masculina , Humanos , Masculino , Infertilidad Masculina/tratamiento farmacológico , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/uso terapéutico , Embarazo , Femenino , Adulto , Índice de Embarazo , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Tasa de NatalidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine the reproductive outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in gynecologic cancer patients and to assess maternal and neonatal complications. METHODS: Women diagnosed with gynecologic cancer who underwent their first in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatment between 2013 and 2021 at Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics and IVF Institute were included in this study. Infertile women without any history of cancer were matched to the cancer group. The primary outcome was the cumulative live birth rate. Baseline and follow-up data were compared between groups using Student's t-tests for normally distributed variables and with Chi-square test for categorical variables. A propensity score-based patient-matching approach was adopted to ensure comparability between individuals with and without specific cancer type. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients with a history of gynecologic cancer and 241 healthy infertile controls were included in this study. Endometrial cancer constituted 50.70% of the cases and cervical cancer constituted 34.60% of the cases. The cancer group exhibited significantly shorter duration of stimulation, lower levels of estradiol, lower number of retrieved oocytes, day-3 embryos, and blastocysts compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The cumulative live birth rate of the gynecologic cancer group was significantly lower than that of the control group (36.10% vs. 60.50%, P < 0.001). Maternal and neonatal complications did not significantly differ between the groups (P > 0.05). The endometrial cancer and cervical cancer groups showed significantly lower cumulative live birth rates than their matched controls (38.60% vs. 64.50%, P = 0.011 and 24.20% vs. 68.60%, P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the decreased occurrence of pregnancy and live birth in female gynecologic cancer patients undergoing ART, particularly in endometrial cancers and cervical cancers. These findings have important implications for counseling and managing gynecologic cancer patients undergoing ART.
Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos , Infertilidad Femenina , Índice de Embarazo , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Embarazo , Supervivientes de Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/terapia , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Infertilidad Femenina/epidemiología , Tasa de Natalidad , Nacimiento Vivo/epidemiología , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas , China/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Objective: To assess the effect of endometrial thickness (EMT) on live birth rates (LBR) in women with endometrial lining between 7.0-9.9 mm. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included women who underwent fresh and frozen embryo transfers between 2008 and 2018, grouped according to their maximum EMT; group 1: 7.0-7.9 mm, group 2: 8.0-8.9 mm, and group 3: 9.0-9.9 mm and underwent blastocyst transfer. Results: The study included 7091 in-vitro fertilization cycles: 1,385 in group 1, 3,000 in group 2, and 2,706 in group 3. The combined LBR was 22.2%. The mean age of women at oocyte retrieval day was 36.2±4.5 years. There was no difference in female age at oocyte retrieval or in the quality of embryos transferred between the three groups. Group 1 had more diagnoses of diminished ovarian reserve (25.5% vs. 19.5% and 19.1%; P=0.001) and less male factor infertility compared with groups 2 and 3, respectively (25.0% vs. 28.8% and 28.5%; P=0.02). LBR was higher with increasing endometrial thickness, groups 2 vs. group 1 (22.0% vs. 17.4%; P=0.0004), group 3 vs. group 1 (25.0% vs. 17.2%; P<0.001), and group 3 vs. group 2 (25.0% vs. 22.0%; P=0.008). After controlling for confounding factors, these three groups did not differ in LBR (group 1 vs. group 2, OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.83-1.4; P=0.54 and group 1 vs. group 3, OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.9-1.5; P=0.24). Conclusion: Live birth rates in women with endometrial thickness between 7.0-9.9 mm were not affected by different cut-offs when blastocyst transfer was performed.
RESUMEN
Objective: This paper serves as an up-to-date narrative review of the most effective methods and outcomes of ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) with new data comparing this method to oocyte and embryo cryopreservation as well as its utility in restoration of endocrine function. Background: Data on OTC are becoming more available as more patients are achieving cancer remission and choosing to use their cryopreserved tissue to conceive or restore endocrine function. With OTC only recently becoming a non-experimental method of fertility preservation, it is important to evaluate, compare, and optimize current practices to improve live birth outcomes. Methods: A literature search of meta-analyses, systematic reviews, case series, retrospective studies, and randomized control trials was performed using the PubMed database with multiple search terms. Discussion: Current practices and outcomes of OTC remain heterogeneous, though they are becoming more streamlined with the emerging data on successful live births. Multiple aspects of OTC have been studied to optimize protocols, particularly methods of cryopreserving, in vitro maturation, and transplantation. In vitro follicle maturation is a novel application with emerging data on methods and outcomes. OTC is a versatile method not only for fertility preservation but also for hormone restoration as well. With wider usage of OTC, ethical dilemmas will need to be addressed. Conclusions: OTC can be used as fertility preservation for a variety of patients. Recent studies suggest it may be comparable to embryo cryopreservation, but with growing data on live births, comparative studies should continue to be performed. In vitro follicle maturation (IVFM) is a promising application of ovarian tissue harvesting. Data are lacking on cost-effectiveness, patient satisfaction, and morbidity associated with OTC.
RESUMEN
RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the impact of ethanol sclerotherapy of endometriomas prior to IVF/ICSI on pregnancy rates ? DESIGN: We reviewed women with endometrioma(s) larger than 25 mm having IVF/ICSI cycles. All patients with a history of ovarian cystectomy were excluded. Two groups were compared: patients who had transvaginal ethanol sclerotherapy of their endometrioma(s) before ovarian stimulation and patients whose endometrioma(s) were left in situ (untreated) at the time of IVF/ICSI (control group). Analyses were adjusted for confounding factors by inverse probability of treatment weighting. The primary endpoint was progressive pregnancy rates per IVF/ICSI cycle including fresh and frozen embryo transfers. Secondary endpoints were live birth rates, the number of mature oocytes retrieved, pregnancy loss. Endometriomas recurrence rates after sclerotherapy and procedural complications were also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 96 cycles (67 patients) were included: 46 cycles (34 patients) in the ethanol sclerotherapy group and 50 cycles (33 patients) in the control group. After propensity score weighting, the pregnancy and live-birth rates were significantly higher in the ethanol sclerotherapy group compared to the control group (weighted OR, 2.9 ; 95 CI, 1.4 - 6.6 and weighted OR 2.4 ; 95 CI, 1.1 - 5.4 respectively), with a lower rate of pregnancy loss (weighted OR 0.3 ; 95 CI, 0.1 - 0.9). Ovarian response was similar in the two groups. The recurrence rate of endometrioma at 6 months after sclerotherapy was 20%. CONCLUSION: Sclerotherapy of endometrioma before ovarian stimulation may increase pregnancy rate, with a low rate of recurrence and a minimal risk of complication.