The Glomerular Filtration Rate: From the Diagnosis of Kidney Function to a Public Health Tool.

The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) continues to increase worldwide, as well as the associated morbidity and mortality and the consequences on the patients' quality of life and countries' economies. CKD often evolves without being recognized by patients and physicians, although the diagnosis is based on two simple laboratory data: the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine analysis. To measure GFR, the knowledge about the physiologic processes at the nephron level, the concept of clearance, and the identification of creatinine as a suitable endogenous marker for measuring the creatinine clearance (CrCl) had to be previously developed. On those bases, different equations to calculate CrCl (Cockcroft and Gault, 1976), or estimated GFR (four variables MDRD, 1999; CKD-Epi, 2009, among others) were generated. They all include creatinine and some demographic data, such as sex and age. However, to compare results throughout life or among laboratories, the creatinine determination must be standardized. In addition, the accuracy of these equations remains controversial in certain subgroups of patients. For these reasons, other mathematical models to improve CrCl estimation have been developed, such as when urine cannot be collected, in debilitated elderly patients and patients with trauma, diabetes, or obesity. Currently, eGFR in adults can be measured and reported immediately, using isotope dilution mass spectrometry traceable creatinine-based equations. In conclusion, based on knowledge obtained from renal physiology, eGFR can be used in the clinic for the diagnosis and early treatment of CKD, as well as a public instrument to estimate the prevalence.

Estimation of glomerular filtration rate from skeletal muscle mass. A new equation independent from age, weight, gender, and ethnicity.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The most used indicator for the renal function is the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Current used predictive GFR equations were calibrated on patients with chronic kidney disease. Thus, they are not very precise in healthy individuals. The estimation of skeletal muscle mass (SMM) allows the prediction of the daily urinary creatinine excretion (24hUCrE). This study proposes an equation for the estimation of GFR based on SMM (eGFRMuscle) and serum creatinine (SCr). METHODS AND RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-six free-living men underwent a bioelectrical impedance analysis for the evaluation of SMM (kg), a blood withdrawal for the measurement of SCr (mg/dL), and a 24-h urinary collection for the assessment of 24hUCrE (g/24 h). The linear regression analysis between SMM and 24hUCrE and the measurement of SCr allowed developing a predictive equation of eGFRMuscle. The equation predicting eGFRMuscle (ml/min/1.73 m2) was SMM (kg) × 3.06/SCr (mg/dL). eGFRMuscle was statistically different from eGFR predicted by Cockroft-Gault, MDRD Study, and CKD-EPI equations (p = 0.017, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). Pairwise comparison of standard error of the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of eGFRMuscle with all the other AUCs of ROC curves highlighted significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: The equation presented in this study results in age, weight, gender, and ethnicity independent because it arises directly from SMM estimation. Therefore, the proposed equation could allow evaluating the GFR also in healthy people with low, average, or high weight, and in older people, regardless of GFR and SCr levels.

Comparison of the Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD and CKD-EPI equations for estimating ganciclovir clearance.

AIMS: Accurately estimating kidney function is essential for the safe administration of renally cleared drugs such as ganciclovir. Current practice recommends adjusting renally eliminated drugs according to the Cockcroft-Gault equation. There are no data on the utility of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations in ganciclovir dosing. To evaluate which renal function equation best predicts ganciclovir clearance. METHODS: The performance of the Cockcroft-Gault equation, isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS)-traceable 4-variable MDRD study (MDRD4-IDMS) equation and CKD-EPI equation in determining ganciclovir clearance were assessed retrospectively in patients treated with ganciclovir from 2004-2015. The MDRD4-IDMS and CKD-EPI equations adjusted to individual body surface area (MDRD4-IDMS·BSA and CKD-EPI·BSA, respectively) were also evaluated. Patients with intravenous ganciclovir peak and trough concentrations in their medical records were included in the study. Ganciclovir clearance was calculated from serum concentrations using a one-compartment model. The five equations were compared based on their predictive ability, the coefficient of determination, through a linear regression analysis. The results were validated in a group of patients. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included in the final analysis. Seventy-four patients were analysed in the learning group and 26 in the validation group. The coefficient of determination was 0.281 for Cockcroft-Gault, 0.301 for CKD-EPI·BSA, 0.308 for MDRD4-IDMS·BSA, 0.324 for MDRD4-IDMS and 0.360 for CKD-EPI. Subgroup analysis also showed that CKD-EPI is a better predictor of ganciclovir clearance. Analysis of the validation group confirmed these results. CONCLUSIONS: The CKD-EPI equation correlates better with ganciclovir clearance than the Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD4-IDMS equations, even the clinical difference between the equations is scarce.

Metabolomic Alterations Associated with Cause of CKD.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Causes of CKD differ in prognosis and treatment. Metabolomic indicators of CKD cause may provide clues regarding the different physiologic processes underlying CKD development and progression. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS & MEASUREMENTS: Metabolites were quantified from serum samples of participants in the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study, a randomized controlled trial of dietary protein restriction and BP control, using untargeted reverse phase ultraperformance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry quantification. Known, nondrug metabolites (n=687) were log-transformed and analyzed to discover associations with CKD cause (polycystic kidney disease, glomerular disease, and other cause). Discovery was performed in Study B, a substudy of MDRD with low GFR (n=166), and replication was performed in Study A, a substudy of MDRD with higher GFR (n=423). RESULTS: Overall in MDRD, average participant age was 51 years and 61% were men. In the discovery study (Study B), 29% of participants had polycystic kidney disease, 28% had glomerular disease, and 43% had CKD of another cause; in the replication study (Study A), the percentages were 28%, 24%, and 48%, respectively. In the discovery analysis, adjusted for demographics, randomization group, body mass index, hypertensive medications, measured GFR, log-transformed proteinuria, and estimated protein intake, seven metabolites (16-hydroxypalmitate, kynurenate, homovanillate sulfate, N2,N2-dimethylguanosine, hippurate, homocitrulline, and 1,5-anhydroglucitol) were associated with CKD cause after correction for multiple comparisons (P<0.0008). Five of these metabolite associations (16-hydroxypalmitate, kynurenate, homovanillate sulfate, N2,N2-dimethylguanosine, and hippurate) were replicated in Study A (P<0.007), with all replicated metabolites exhibiting higher levels in polycystic kidney disease and lower levels in glomerular disease compared with CKD of other causes. CONCLUSIONS: Metabolomic profiling identified several metabolites strongly associated with cause of CKD.

Comparing Results of Five Glomerular Filtration Rate-Estimating Equations in the Korean General Population: MDRD Study, Revised Lund-Malmö, and Three CKD-EPI Equations.

BACKGROUND: Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is a widely used index of kidney function. Recently, new formulas such as the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations or the Lund-Malmö equation were introduced for assessing eGFR. We compared them with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation in the Korean adult population. METHODS: The study population comprised 1,482 individuals (median age 51 [42-59] yr, 48.9% males) who received annual physical check-ups during the year 2014. Serum creatinine (Cr) and cystatin C (CysC) were measured. We conducted a retrospective analysis using five GFR estimating equations (MDRD Study, revised Lund-Malmö, and Cr and/or CysC-based CKD-EPI equations). Reduced GFR was defined as eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m². RESULTS: For the GFR category distribution, large discrepancies were observed depending on the equation used; category G1 (≥90 mL/min/1.73 m²) ranged from 7.4-81.8%. Compared with the MDRD Study equation, the other four equations overestimated GFR, and CysC-based equations showed a greater difference (-31.3 for CKD-EPI(CysC) and -20.5 for CKD-EPI(Cr-CysC)). CysC-based equations decreased the prevalence of reduced GFR by one third (9.4% in the MDRD Study and 2.4% in CKD-EPI(CysC)). CONCLUSIONS: Our data shows that there are remarkable differences in eGFR assessment in the Korean population depending on the equation used, especially in normal or mildly decreased categories. Further prospective studies are necessary in various clinical settings.

Comparison of GFR calculation methods: MDRD and CKD-EPI vs. (99m)Tc-DTPA tracer clearance rates.

INTRODUCTION: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is considered the best index of kidney function. The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD)-Study equation has gained worldwide acceptance for estimating GFR from serum creatinine. Recently the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) group developed a new equation that claims to be more accurate and could replace MDRD for routine clinical use. Nuclear medicine methods are accepted as more accurate, and have become regular practice provided they are easily available. The aim of this study was to evaluate how indirect GFR calculations correlated with the nuclear medicine method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors compared (99m)Tc-DTPA clearance using the Gates method and a two-blood sample method with MDRD and CKD-EPI, in a population of renal donor candidates and oncological patients treated with nephrotoxic chemotherapy. RESULTS: Our results showed that even though both equations provided a good correlation (p < 0.001) with GFR evaluated by the nuclear medicine method, they underestimated the GFR value in comparison to nuclear medicine methods. Our study also found that CKD-EPI was superior to MDRD. CONCLUSION: Using purely creatinine-based GFR estimates can lead to complications in clinical practice, especially when correct GFR values are mandatory, like when calculating adequate chemotherapy dosage, and should be used with caution. When the more accurate nuclear medicine methods are unavailable due to cost or accessibility issues, our study showed that the new CKD-EPI appears to reflect GFR results more accurately than MDRD, and thus should be the method of choice for estimating GFR.