Superiority of Avacopan and Mepolizumab to Glucocorticoid Tapering in the Treatment of Anti-neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (ANCA)-Associated Vasculitis: A Systematic Review.

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) comprises a spectrum of autoimmune diseases, including granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA). Studies have shown that avacopan and mepolizumab are promising therapeutics for partial or complete replacement of glucocorticoids (GC), with sustained remission while completely weaning off GC. Avacopan inhibits C5aR in the complement pathway, preventing neutrophil migration, while mepolizumab targets IL-5R, reducing eosinophil activity. Additionally, complement inhibition has not only contributed to the recovery of renal function and alleviation of physical symptoms but has also enhanced patients' overall quality of life and mental well-being. This systematic review explores the pathogenesis of AAV, traditional treatments, and the potential of emerging complement and interleukin antagonist therapies such as avacopan and mepolizumab in revolutionizing AAV management.

Combination effect of Mepolizumab and Endobronchial Watanabe Spigot (EWS) in drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonia complicated by refractory pneumothorax.

Few reports have described the treatment of eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) complicated by refractory pneumothorax. A 62-year-old man with a medical history of ulcerative colitis who was undergoing maintenance treatment presented with fever, cough, and diffuse bilateral consolidation on chest radiography. Laboratory findings showed peripheral eosinophilia, and he was hospitalized with a diagnosis of drug-induced EP and started on corticosteroid therapy. During the course, he developed refractory pneumothorax, and it was difficult to control the air leakage. As it was necessary to control the eosinophilic inflammation and air leakage, mepolizumab, a humanized anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody, and an endobronchial Watanabe spigot (EWS), were introduced. After EWS insertion, the leakage of the refractory pneumothorax disappeared. The patient continued to have no recurrence of EP or pneumothorax after the removal of the EWS. The combination of mepolizumab and an EWS may be effective in cases of EP complicated by refractory pneumothorax.

Real-world outcomes on quality-of-life improvement in patients with nasal polyposis treated with mepolizumab. RINOSUR study.

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is characterized by nasal obstruction, reduced sense of smell, rhinorrhea, and facial pain for more than 12 weeks, significantly affecting quality of life (QoL), especially in patients with NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD). Initial treatment includes intranasal corticosteroids and nasal irrigations, followed by systemic corticosteroids (SC) in severe cases, as well as endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and biological agents. Mepolizumab, a monoclonal antibody against IL-5, has been shown to reduce eosinophilic inflammation in CRSwNP. This study evaluates the improvement in quality of life of patients with CRSwNP treated with mepolizumab before December 2023, recorded by the RINOSUR group. A retrospective observational multicenter cohort study is presented in adult patients with severe asthma and concomitant CRSwNP, treated with mepolizumab 100 mg. Variables such as sex, asthma, allergies, NERD, corticosteroid dependence, and serum eosinophil count were recorded. All patients underwent nasal endoscopy and completed the SNOT22 questionnaire. Therapeutic response was evaluated at 12 months. Out of 143 patients recruited, only 28.6% had the necessary data. 61% were women with a mean age of 55 years. All were corticosteroid-dependent and had required at least one ESS. A 22% reduction in SC cycles was observed, and no patient required revision surgery in the 12 months following treatment. The SNOT22 score was reduced by 53 points, and serum eosinophilia also showed a significant decrease. Mepolizumab is effective in treating severe uncontrolled CRSwNP, improving QoL and reducing dependence on systemic corticosteroids. Its activity is monitored by peripheral blood eosinophilia. Consistency in data collection is crucial to evaluate efficacy and manage the disease.

Current goals of NSAID-ERD management: patient-centered approaches involving NSAID desensitization with and without biologics.

Classic approach of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) - exacerbated respiratory disease (NSAID-ERD) includes pharmaceutical and surgical treatments, as well as avoidance of COX-1-inhibitor NSAIDs. The introduction of biologics in the treatment of severe asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) represents an alternative therapeutic approach to the classical aspirin therapy after desensitization (ATAD) in some regions, and with convincing results. However, their use is limited due to approval and/or high-cost restrictions. NSAID-ERD is a mainly type 2 (T2) and highly eosinophilic disease, and monoclonal antibodies targeting IgE or interleukins (IL)-5, IL-4, and IL-13 have been shown to be effective for both severe asthma and severe CRSwNP. So far, dupilumab demonstrated greater efficacy in NSAID-ERD than in aspirin-tolerant patients with regards to several clinical outcomes. Patients with NSAID-ERD respond very rapidly to omalizumab also, with reduction in the release of prostaglandin D2 and cysteinyl leukotrienes. Patients favored biologic treatment over ATAD in multiple retrospective analyses, which must be acknowledged when choosing one or the other option. While this review will summarize ATAD in general, it will more prominently focus on when ATAD should be considered, even when T2 biologics are available. Additionally, there are conflicting studies as to whether patients on a T2 biologic become desensitized to NSAIDs, as omalizumab proved to restore tolerance to aspirin in only two thirds of patients. This goal of NSAIDs tolerance should be considered as part of disease control future approaches, representing one of many aspects in a patient-centered care approach.

Efficient use of mepolizumab in children: An analysis of the economically justifiable price in Colombia.

INTRODUCTION: Asthma imposes a crucial economic burden on health systems, especially with the incorporation of new drugs. Recently, mepolizumab has been approved to prevent exacerbations in patients with eosinophilic asthma. This study explores the economically justifiable price of mepolizumab for preventing exacerbations in children with severe asthma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A model was developed using the microsimulation to estimate the quality-adjusted costs and life years of two interventions: mepolizumab versus not applying standard treatment without mepolizumab. This analysis was made during a time horizon of 50 years and from a third-payer perspective. RESULTS: Mepolizumab was cost-effective using a WTP of U$ 19,992 per QALY, but not at a WTP of U$ 4828, U$ 5128 per QALY. The economically justifiable cost for mepolizumab in Colombia is between $33 and $350 per dose, for WTP of U$ 4828, and U$ 5128 respectively. At the current price of Mepolizumab, U$ 780 per dose, only using a WTP higher than U$ 10,300 per QALY mepolizumab will be the best alternative to no mepolizumab. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that the economically justifiable cost for mepolizumab in Colombia is between $33 and $350 per dose, for WTP of 4828 and 5180 respectively. This result should encourage more studies in the region that optimize decision-making processes when incorporating this drug into the health plans of each country.

Temporal variation in the effectiveness of biologics in asthma: Effect modification by changing patient characteristics.

BACKGROUND: The underlying population of patients selected for each respiratory monoclonal antibody might change as other biologics are approved. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effect modification by calendar time of the effectiveness of each respiratory biologics in asthma. METHODS: The Effectiveness of Respiratory biologics in Asthma (ERA) is a retrospective cohort of severe asthma patients from the Mass General Brigham clinics between January 2013 and September 2023. Periods were pre-specified as the anti-IgE (2013-2015), anti-IL5 (2016-2018), anti-IL4/13 (2019-2021) or anti-alarmin (2022-2023) era. We evaluated each biologic's effect on asthma-related exacerbations comparing the one-year period before and after therapy initiation using Poisson regression and Cox regression for time-to-first exacerbation. RESULTS: Of 647 biologic-naïve patients, 165 initiated omalizumab, 235 anti-IL5, 227 dupilumab, and 20 tezepelumab. Omalizumab's effectiveness improved as more biologics were approved: incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.16 [0.94-1.43] anti-IgE era vs. 0.54 [0.37-0.80] anti-IL4/13-alarmin era. Omalizumab patients in the anti-IL4/13-alarmin era had lower blood eosinophil counts and less chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). For anti-IL5s, effectiveness peaked in the anti-IL4/13 era (IRR 0.52 [0.42-0.64]) when patients had higher BMI and less concomitant CRSwNP. Dupilumab was most effective in the anti-IL4/13 era (IRR 0.60 [0.50-0.72]). There were fewer current smokers in dupilumab patients in the anti-IL4/13 era. Results were similar in time-to-event analyses and in sensitivity analyses accounting for the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: There are temporal variations in the effectiveness of biologics partly explained by the shift in the underlying population, particularly for omalizumab. Though having more choices was associated with better patient selection for omalizumab, this was inconsistent for other biologics.

Three cases of relapsed eosinophilic sinusitis without eosinophilia during mepolizumab maintenance therapy for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.

We present three cases of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) where patients experienced relapse of eosinophilic sinusitis without peripheral eosinophilia while on remission maintenance therapy with mepolizumab (MPZ), an anti-interleukin (IL)-5 monoclonal antibody. Despite the initial control of symptoms with high-dose prednisolone (PSL) and MPZ, patients experienced a relapse of nasal obstruction and eosinophilic infiltration in nasal mucosal biopsies. Notably, relapses occurred despite normal peripheral eosinophil counts, indicating the localized nature of eosinophilic inflammation. While IL-5 inhibitors effectively reduce peripheral blood eosinophils, eosinophilic sinusitis may persist due to local factors such as IL-4-mediated inflammation. IL-4 has been implicated in promoting eosinophil migration into nasal tissues, suggesting that IL-5 inhibitors alone may not sufficiently suppress eosinophilic infiltration in such cases. These findings highlight the importance of considering the possibility of eosinophilic sinusitis relapse in EGPA patients treated with IL-5 inhibitors and reduced glucocorticoid doses. Further research is warranted to elucidate the mechanisms underlying local eosinophilic inflammation and optimize treatment strategies for EGPA patients.

A comparison of the impact of anti-IL5/5r therapies in allergic versus non-allergic patients with severe eosinophilic asthma in a real-life setting.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of allergic patients (AP) and non-allergic patients (NAP) with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) treated with anti-IL5/IL5R biologic agents (mepolizumab, benralizumab, or reslizumab) over one year. Sub-analyses assessed treatment response variations between AP and NAP based on the biological used and compared outcomes among AP with and without fungal allergy. METHODS: Observational retrospective analysis. Clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, pulmonary function tests, Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores, oral corticosteroid (OCS) usage, and exacerbation frequency were assessed at the initiation of biological treatment and after one year. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients with SEA were included, 41 AP and 24 NAP. 55.4% were treated with mepolizumab, 33.8% with benralizumab, and 10.8% with reslizumab. Before anti-IL5/5R treatment, AP had worse baseline outcomes but there were no differences in pulmonary function. Mean annual exacerbation rate and percentage of patients requiring OCS and dose of prednisone were higher in AP than NAP. AP had significantly higher total IgE values. After one year of treatment, more AP discontinued OCS than NAP (p = 0.025). Both experienced a significant reduction in exacerbation frequency (p = 0.001) and improved respiratory function. 70.7% of AP and 60% of NAP improved ACT ≥3 points. There was no significant difference between AP and NAP using mepolizumab (p = 0.145) or benralizumab (p = 0.174) in reducing OCS. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-IL5/IL5R reduced the need for OCS and improved asthma control, regardless of allergic status. Fungal allergy led to lower ACT scores and higher exacerbations than other allergens; both groups improved with anti-IL5/ILR.

Mepolizumab in Severe Pediatric Asthma: Certainties and Doubts through a Single-Center Experience and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Although, in most children with asthma, good symptom control is achieved with a low to moderate dose of inhaled corticosteroids, a small group of patients still experiences frequent symptoms, and even severe exacerbations, impairment of lung function, and reduced quality of life. Some of these subjects with severe asthma require biologic drugs as add-on therapy. In the past decade, numerous monoclonal antibodies have been approved for children or adolescents with severe asthma, in addition to their increasing use in adult asthma. However, the available evidence on how to select the most appropriate biologic based on a single patient's clinical, functional, and laboratory characteristics is still scant, and is insufficient to guide clinicians in the decision-making process of a personalized treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report a case series of four patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with mepolizumab, an anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody, and review the existing literature on this treatment in children and adolescents. RESULTS: Our patients, all with blood eosinophilia and elevated fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels, developed poor symptom control despite prolonged treatment with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus a second controller, addressing the addition of a biologic drug. In all of them, a 12-month treatment with subcutaneous mepolizumab showed a reduction in the blood eosinophil count and in asthma exacerbations, as well as an improvement on the Asthma Control Test. The results of the literature search focused on the strengths and limitations of the pediatric use of mepolizumab and highlighted the areas worthy of further research. CONCLUSIONS: Mepolizumab has proven effective in improving symptom control in pediatric patients with severe asthma. Additional well-powered clinical trials will be helpful in developing evidence-based guidelines regarding biologic drugs in the pediatric population.

Real-World Effectiveness of Mepolizumab in Severe Asthma: Results from the Multi-country, Self-controlled Nucala Effectiveness Study (NEST).

INTRODUCTION: The Nucala Effectiveness Study (NEST) assessed the effectiveness of mepolizumab in patients with severe asthma (SA) in countries previously underrepresented in real-world studies. METHODS: A multi-country, bi-directional, self-controlled, observational cohort study conducted in Colombia, Chile, India, Türkiye, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Oman, and Qatar. Historical and/or prospective data from patients with SA were assessed 12 months pre- and post-mepolizumab initiation. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: incident rate ratio (IRR) of clinically significant exacerbations (CSEs). Key secondary endpoints: healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU), oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, lung function and symptom control (Asthma Control Test [ACT] scores). RESULTS: Overall, 525 patients with SA burden pre-initiation (geometric mean blood eosinophil count [BEC] 490.7 cells/µl; 31.4% prior biologic use; 37.3% obese) received at least one dose of mepolizumab 100 mg subcutaneously. Post-initiation, a significant reduction in CSEs was observed (76% [p < 0.001]; IRR [95% confidence interval] 0.24 [0.19-0.30]); 72.0% of patients had no CSEs. Mepolizumab treatment led to a reduction in OCS use (52.8% pre-initiation vs. 16.6% post-initiation) and a mean (standard deviation [SD]) change in OCS dose of - 18.1 (20.7) mg post-initiation; 36.1% of patients became OCS-free. Fewer patients were hospitalised post-initiation (22.5% pre-initiation vs. 6.9% post-initiation). Improvements in mean (SD) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (62.8 [20.2]% pre-initiation vs. 73.0 [22.7]% post-initiation) and ACT scores (15.0% pre-initiation vs. 64.5% of patients post-initiation with well-controlled asthma) were observed. Proportion of patients with BEC ≥ 500 cells/µl decreased from 84.4% pre-initiation to 18.1% post-initiation. CONCLUSION: Mepolizumab was effective in reducing the burden of SA by significantly reducing CSEs, reducing OCS use and HCRU, and improving lung function and asthma control, which could translate to improvements in health-related quality of life in patients with SA and high OCS dependency in the countries studied. A graphical abstract is available with this article.

Severe asthma occurs when asthma symptoms remain uncontrolled despite optimised treatment. In many low-middle income countries, and in some countries in the Middle East, Asia, Latin America and the Arab Gulf, the management and treatment of patients with severe asthma remain poor, with many patients having unscheduled hospital visits or admission, and use of steroids for a prolonged period. Mepolizumab is an injectable monoclonal antibody approved as an add-on treatment for severe asthma in patients ≥ 6 years of age. In clinical trials, mepolizumab has demonstrated reductions in the risk of clinically significant exacerbations (CSE; an asthma exacerbation that requires systemic corticosteroids and/or an emergency room visit and/or hospitalisation) and the need for oral corticosteroid (OCS) treatment in patients with severe asthma by reducing inflammation caused by eosinophil (a type of white blood cell) production. The Nucala Effectiveness Study (NEST) was performed to observe the effectiveness of mepolizumab in people with severe asthma in Colombia, Chile, India, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Oman and Qatar. The frequency of CSEs and other outcomes was compared 12 months pre- and post-mepolizumab initiation. Post-initiation, the risk of CSEs was significantly reduced by 76% (p < 0.001), and 72% of patients had no CSEs. Fewer patients were dependent on OCS, with 36.1% of patients not using OCS at all, and fewer patients were hospitalised. Lung function and asthma control also improved. NEST shows that mepolizumab could benefit people with severe asthma living in countries where disease-related burden and OCS use remain high.

Long-Term Clinical and Sustained REMIssion in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Treated With Mepolizumab: The REMI-M Study.

BACKGROUND: Biological therapies, such as mepolizumab, have transformed the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma. Although mepolizumab's short-term effectiveness is established, there is limited evidence on its ability to achieve long-term clinical remission. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of mepolizumab, explore its potential to induce clinical and sustained remission, and identify baseline factors associated with the likelihood of achieving remission over 24 months. METHODS: The REMIssion in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Treated with Mepolizumab (REMI-M) is a retrospective, real-world, multicenter study that analyzed 303 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma who received mepolizumab. Clinical, demographic, and safety data were collected at baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The most commonly used definitions of clinical remission, which included no exacerbations, no oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, and good asthma control with or without assessment of lung function parameters, were assessed. Sustained remission was defined as reaching clinical remission at 12 months and maintaining it until the end of the 24-month period. RESULTS: Clinical remission rates ranged from 28.6% to 43.2% after 12 months and from 26.8% to 52.9% after 24 months based on the different remission definitions. The proportion of patients achieving sustained remission varied between 14.6% and 29%. Factors associated with the likelihood of achieving clinical remission included the presence of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, better lung function at baseline, male sex, absence of anxiety/depression, gastroesophageal reflux disease, bronchiectasis, and reduced OCS consumption. Adverse events were infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the real-world effectiveness of mepolizumab in achieving clinical remission and sustained remission in severe eosinophilic asthma over 24 months. The identification of distinct factors associated with the likelihood of achieving clinical remission emphasizes the importance of comprehensive management of comorbidities and timely identification of patients who may benefit from biologics.

Long-term effects of mepolizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma: a 6-year real-life experience.

Background: Severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) is often linked to a dysregulation in the Interleukin-(IL)-5 axis. Mepolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, reduces eosinophils by directly binging to IL-5, potentially restoring homeostatic eosinophil biology, with a significant impact on quality of life, acute exacerbations and oral corticosteroids (OCS) elimination in SEA patients. While its short- and middle-term effects are well described, no study has so far investigated its long-lasting effects in SEA patients. The aim of our study was therefore to explore the effects of a long-term, six-year continuous treatment with mepolizumab on clinical control and clinical remission in a cohort of SEA patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of clinical records of patients who were prescribed mepolizumab between June 2017 and April 2018. We collected demographical, functional, and clinical data from visits performed at baseline and then at the specified timepoints and checked if patients had reached clinical remission after 6 years. We assessed asthma control test (ACT), exacerbation rate, and OCS elimination dose at 6 years. Clinical Remission (CR) was defined on the basis of the elimination of OCS and the contemporary presence of all the following: 1) stable lung function; 2) no exacerbation in the previous 12 months; 3) acceptable symptom control (ACT ≥ 20). Results: Of 86 patients screened, 62 were included in the final analysis. Our study suggests that mepolizumab is effective and well tolerated after a six-year course of continuous treatment in patients with SEA. We reported a prevalence of 28 (46.8%) patients who reached complete CR at 72 months from the treatment start. 75% of patients eliminated the maintenance OCS already after 1 year of treatment; this proportion reached the 87% within the sixth year of treatment. Conclusion: Mepolizumab proved to be effective in real-life after 6 years of treatment, inducing a complete clinical remission in the 46.8% of patients, with sustained improvements in quality of life, exacerbation rate, OCS intake and lung function.

Biologics in T2 Severe Asthma: Unveiling Different Effectiveness by Real-World Indirect Comparison.

Background: Indirect comparison among biologics in severe asthma (SA) is a challenging but desirable goal for clinicians in real life. The aim of the study is to define characteristics of a biologic-treated T2-driven-SA population and to evaluate the effectiveness of biologic treatments in a real-world setting by variation in intra/inter-biologic parameters in an up to 4-year follow-up. Methods: Demographic, clinical, functional, and biological characteristics were evaluated retrospectively in 104 patients recruited until July 2022 at baseline (T0) and over a maximum of 4 years (T4) of biologic therapy (omalizumab/OmaG = 41, from T0 to T4, mepolizumab/MepoG = 26, from T0 to T4, benralizumab/BenraG = 18, from T0 to T2, and dupilumab/DupiG = 19, from T0 to T1). Variations of parameters using means of paired Delta were assessed. Results: At baseline, patients had high prevalence of T2-driven comorbidities, low asthma control test (ACT mean 17.65 ± 4.41), impaired pulmonary function (FEV1 65 ± 18 %pred), frequent exacerbations/year (AEs 3.5 ± 3), and OCS dependence (60%). DupiG had lower T2 biomarkers/comorbidities and AEs, and worse FEV1 (57 ± 19 %pred) compared to other biologics (p < 0.05). All biologics improved ACT, FEV1%, FVC%, AEs rate, and OCS use. FEV1% improved in MepoG and BenraG over the minimal clinically important difference and was sustained over 4 years in OmaG and MepoG. A significant RV reduction in OmaG (T4) and DupiG (T1), and BenraG normalization (T2) of airflow limitation were found. We observed through inter-biologic parameters pair delta variation comparison a significant nocturnal awakenings reduction in BenraG vs. OmaG/MepoG, and neutrophils reduction in BenraG/DupiG vs. OmaG. Conclusions: Indirect comparison among biologics unveils clinical and functional improvements that may mark a different effectiveness. These results may highlight the preference of a single biologic compared to another with regard to specific treatable traits.

The Puzzling Coexistence of Eosinophilic Pneumonia With Sjogren's Syndrome: A Diagnostic Dilemma.

We present a case where a patient with no significant pulmonary nor autoimmune medical history presents with acute hypoxic respiratory failure and a dry cough that's made worse when conversing. She gets diagnosed with eosinophilic pneumonia after bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) showed 70% eosinophils while also having labs highly suggestive of primary Sjogren's syndrome (pSS) with an anti-SSA titer of 111.3 U/mL and anti-SSA 52 kD Ab, immunoglobulin (Ig)G >200 U. The initial treatment plan was to start rituximab to target primary Sjogren's syndrome associated interstitial lung disease (pSS-ILD), however after close discussion with pulmonology, it was changed to mepolizumab to target eosinophilic pneumonia. From a diagnostic standpoint, it may be tricky to determine which disease process is driving the symptoms especially when the patient has labs that are convincing for both.

Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies in allergy: Targeting IgE, cytokine, and alarmin pathways.

The etiology of allergy is closely linked to type 2 inflammatory responses ultimately leading to the production of allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE), a key driver of many allergic conditions. At a high level, initial allergen exposure disrupts epithelial integrity, triggering local inflammation via alarmins including IL-25, IL-33, and TSLP, which activate type 2 innate lymphoid cells as well as other immune cells to secrete type 2 cytokines IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13, promoting Th2 cell development and eosinophil recruitment. Th2 cell dependent B cell activation promotes the production of allergen-specific IgE, which stably binds to basophils and mast cells. Rapid degranulation of these cells upon allergen re-exposure leads to allergic symptoms. Recent advances in our understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying allergic pathophysiology have significantly shaped the development of therapeutic intervention strategies. In this review, we highlight key therapeutic targets within the allergic cascade with a particular focus on past, current and future treatment approaches using monoclonal antibodies. Specific targeting of alarmins, type 2 cytokines and IgE has shown varying degrees of clinical benefit in different allergic indications including asthma, chronic spontaneous urticaria, atopic dermatitis, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, food allergies and eosinophilic esophagitis. While multiple therapeutic antibodies have been approved for clinical use, scientists are still working on ways to improve on current treatment approaches. Here, we provide context to understand therapeutic targeting strategies and their limitations, discussing both knowledge gaps and promising future directions to enhancing clinical efficacy in allergic disease management.

Mepolizumab depletes inflammatory but preserves homeostatic eosinophils in severe asthma.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophils are key therapeutic targets in severe asthma that are suppressed by IL5 (mepolizumab) and IL5 receptor (benralizumab) blockade. The effect of IL5 pathway biologics on recently described homeostatic (hEOs) and inflammatory (iEOs) eosinophil subsets is unknown. We aimed to determine the relative impact of mepolizumab and benralizumab treatment on eosinophil subset and phenotype, and explore clinical associations of eosinophil subsets with severe asthma characteristics and treatment response. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional observational study of severe asthma (eosinophilic n = 32, non-eosinophilic n = 23, mepolizumab-treated n = 25), with longitudinal follow-up of 30 eosinophilic participants at two timepoints (4-24 weeks, >24 weeks) post-commencement of mepolizumab (n = 20) or benralizumab (n = 10). Blood hEOs and iEOs were measured by flow cytometry assessment of surface CD62L protein. RESULTS: iEO proportion was significantly lower in mepolizumab-treated participants in both the cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Mepolizumab and benralizumab depleted iEOs to a similar extent, however a significantly greater number of hEOs remained in mepolizumab participants at follow-up. Greater iEO proportion correlated with poorer asthma control in eosinophilic but not non-eosinophilic asthma. Higher residual iEO proportion correlated with poorer asthma control in mepolizumab-treated individuals. Reduced blood eosinophil viability was observed in around half of mepolizumab-treated participants, which was associated with significantly better asthma control and spirometry. CONCLUSIONS: Mepolizumab depletes iEOs and reduces circulating eosinophil viability in severe asthma but preserves a residual population of circulatory hEOs. In contrast benralizumab depleted both iEOs and hEOs. Higher iEO abundance and eosinophil viability are associated with poorer clinical outcomes following mepolizumab-treatment. Monitoring circulating eosinophil phenotype and viability may be useful to predict biologic treatment response in severe asthma.

Healing chronic idiopathic eosinophilic pneumonia using mepolizumab alone without corticosteroids.

While glucocorticoids remain the standard first-line treatment for chronic idiopathic eosinophilic pneumonia (CIEP), the long-term use is marred by significant side effects. This case study explores the effectiveness of mepolizumab, an anti-interleukin­5 (IL-5) monoclonal antibody, as a novel corticosteroid-free alternative in treating CIEP. A 50-year-old woman presented with a 3-week history of progressive shortness of breath, dry cough and night sweats. The blood tests showed eosinophilia, and chest radiography identified lung consolidations. The CIEP was confirmed, ruling out other conditions through a detailed clinical and bronchoscopic work-up. The patient declined to be treated with systemic glucocorticoids. Treatment with mepolizumab was remarkable for effectively resolving symptoms and improving radiological findings without any prior or concurrent glucocorticoid therapy. Notably, the patient remained relapse-free over a 2-year follow-up, underscoring mepolizumab's efficacy as a corticosteroid-free treatment for CIEP. This case study calls for further research into anti-IL­5 treatment of rare respiratory conditions.

SingleNucleotide Polymorphisms as Biomarkers of Mepolizumab and Benralizumab Treatment Response in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma.

The most promising treatment options for severe uncontrolled asthma (SUA) have emerged in recent years with the development of monoclonal antibodies for blocking selective targets responsible for the underlying inflammation, such as mepolizumab and benralizumab. However, there is variability in treatment response that is not fully controlled. The variability of the response to mepolizumab and benralizumab could be influenced by single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and it would be useful to detect these and use them as predictive biomarkers of response. We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of 72 Caucasian patients recruited from a tertiary hospital with severe uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma treated with mepolizumab and benralizumab. Polymorphisms in the IL5 (rs4143832, rs17690122), RAD50 (rs11739623, rs4705959), IL1RL1 (rs1420101, rs17026974, rs1921622), GATA2 (rs4857855), IKZF2 (rs12619285), FCGR2A (rs1801274), FCGR2B (rs3219018, rs1050501), FCGR3A (rs10127939, rs396991), FCER1A (rs2251746, rs2427837), FCER1B (rs1441586, rs573790, rs569108), and ZNF415 (rs1054485) genes were analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using Taqman probes. The response was analyzed after 12 months of treatment. In patients under mepolizumab treatment, a treatment response defined as a reduction in exacerbations was associated with ZNF415 rs1054485-T (p = 0.042; OR = 5.33; 95% CI = 1.06-30.02), treatment response defined as a reduction in oral corticosteroids use was associated with the number of exacerbations in the previous year (p = 0.029; OR = 3.89; 95% CI = 1.24-14.92), and treatment response defined as improvement in lung function was associated with the age at the beginning of biological therapy (p = 0.002; OR = 1.10; 95% CI = 1.04-1.18), FCER1B rs569108-AA (p < 0.001; OR = 171.06; 95% CI = 12.94-6264.11), and FCER1A rs2427837-A (p = 0.021; OR = 8.61; 95% CI = 1.71-76.62). On the other hand, in patients under benralizumab treatment, treatment response, defined as a reduction in exacerbations, was associated with ZNF415 rs1054485-T (p = 0.073; OR = 1.3 × 108; 95% CI = 1.8 × 10-19-NA), FCER1B rs569108-AA (p = 0.050; OR = 11.51; 95% CI = 1.19-269.78), allergies (p = 0.045; OR = 4.02; 95% CI = 1.05-16.74), and sex (p = 0.028; OR = 4.78; 95% CI = 1.22-20.63); and treatment response defined as improvement in lung function was associated with polyposis (p = 0.027; OR = 9.16; 95% CI = 1.58-91.4), IKZF2 rs12619285-AA (p = 0.019; OR = 9.1; 95% CI = 1.7-75.78), IL5 rs4143832-T (p = 0.017; OR = 11.1; 95% CI = 1.9-112.17), and FCER1B rs1441586-C (p = 0.045; OR = 7.81; 95% CI = 1.16-73.45). The results of this study show the potential influence of the studied polymorphisms on the response to mepolizumab and benralizumab and the clinical benefit that could be obtained by defining predictive biomarkers of treatment response.

[Update on treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis]. / Therapie-Update der ANCA-assoziierten Vaskulitiden.

This article summarizes the current guidelines and recommendations published by the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR), the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). In addition to glucocorticoids (GC), treatment with biologics is nowadays an established option to treat Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV). Rituximab (RTX) is used for remission induction and maintenance in organ-threatening and non-organ-threatening granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA). For eosinophilic GPA (EGPA) anti-interleukin 5 (IL5) strategies are an important component of treatment for remission induction and maintenance of refractory or relapsing non-organ-threatening diseases in conjunction with GC. The dosing of GC for remission induction in GPA and MPA is now lower than was previously used and additionally, avacopan is approved as a new GC-sparing medication for GPA and MPA over 52 weeks. Conventional strategies, such as cyclophosphamide (CYC) are important for remission induction in severe or refractory organ-threatening disease for all AAVs. The use of methotrexate (MTX) and azathioprine (AZA) is becoming less prominent. The most important unanswered questions in the treatment of AAVs are with respect to the duration of remission maintenance treatment and the individualized treatment guidance based on biomarkers.

Race and ethnicity, not just insurance, is associated with biologics initiation in asthma and related conditions.

BACKGROUND: There are pre-existing inequities in asthma care. OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate effect modification by race of the effect of insurance on biologic therapy use in patients with asthma and related diseases. METHODS: We conducted inverse probability weighted analyses using electronic health records data from 2011 to 2020 from a large health care system in Boston, Mass. We evaluated the odds of not initiating omalizumab or mepolizumab therapy within 1 year of prescription for an approved indication. RESULTS: We identified 1132 individuals who met study criteria. Twenty-seven percent of these patients had public insurance and 12% belonged to a historically marginalized group (HMG). One-quarter of patients did not initiate the prescribed biologic. Among patients with asthma, individuals belonging to HMG had higher exacerbation rates in the period before initiation compared to non-HMG individuals, regardless of insurance type. Among HMG patients with asthma, those with private insurance were less likely to not initiate therapy compared to those with public insurance (odds ratio [OR]: 0.67, and 95% CI: 0.56-0.79). Among non-HMG with asthma, privately insured and publicly insured individuals had similar rates of not initiating the prescribed biologic (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.95-1.09). Among those publicly insured with asthma, HMGs had higher odds of not initiating therapy compared to non-HMGs (OR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.03-1.31), but privately insured HMG and non-HMG did not differ significantly (OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.91-1.07). CONCLUSIONS: Publicly insured individuals belonging to HMG are less likely to initiate biologics when prescribed despite having more severe asthma, while there are no inequities by insurance in individuals belonging to other groups.