RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is commonly used in clinical practice to reduce intubation times and enhance patient comfort. However, patient-ventilator interaction (PVI) during NIV, particularly with helmet interfaces, can be challenging due to factors such as dead space and compliance. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) has shown promise in improving PVI during helmet NIV, but limitations remain. A new mode, neural pressure support (NPS), aims to address these limitations by providing synchronized and steep pressurization. This study aims to assess whether NPS per se improves PVI during helmet NIV compared to standard pressure support ventilation (PSV). METHODS: The study included adult patients requiring NIV with a helmet. Patients were randomized into two arms: one starting with NPS and the other with PSV; the initial ventilatory parameters were always set as established by the clinician on duty. Physiological parameters and arterial blood gas analysis were collected during ventilation trials. Expert adjustments to initial ventilator settings were recorded to investigate the impact of the expertise of the clinician as confounding variable. Primary aim was the synchrony time (Timesync), i.e., the time during which both the ventilator and the patient (based on the neural signal) are on the inspiratory phase. As secondary aim neural-ventilatory time index (NVTI) was also calculated as Timesync divided to the total neural inspiratory time, i.e., the ratio of the neural inspiratory time occupied by Timesync. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled, with no study interruptions due to safety concerns. NPS demonstrated significantly longer Timesync (0.64 ± 0.03 s vs. 0.37 ± 0.03 s, p < 0.001) and shorter inspiratory delay (0.15 ± 0.01 s vs. 0.35 ± 0.01 s, p < 0.001) compared to PSV. NPS also showed better NVTI (78 ± 2% vs. 45 ± 2%, p < 0.001). Ventilator parameters were not significantly different between NPS and PSV, except for minor adjustments by the expert clinician. CONCLUSIONS: NPS improves PVI during helmet NIV, as evidenced by longer Timesync and better coupling compared to PSV. Expert adjustments to ventilator settings had minimal impact on PVI. These findings support the use of NPS in enhancing patient-ventilator synchronization and warrant further investigation into its clinical outcomes and applicability across different patient populations and interfaces. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered on www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov NCT06004206 Registry URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06004206 on September 08, 2023.
RESUMEN
Severe bronchiolitis patients are often supported with non-invasive ventilation (NIV). In case of NIV failure, we recently started to use non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist ventilation (NIV-NAVA) with a total face mask interface (TFM) and report now our experience with this modality of respiratory support. Retrospective study was made from October 2022 to May 2023 at the Geneva University Hospital Paediatric Intensive Care Unit. Inclusion criteria were children, aged from 0 to 6 months, with severe bronchiolitis with initial NIV failure and switch to NIV-NAVA-TFM. From 49 children with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-induced bronchiolitis requiring any form of respiratory support, 10 (median age 61 days (IQR 44-73) failing CPAP or NIV underwent rescue treatment with NIV-NAVA using a TFM. Patients were switched to TFM-NIV-NAVA 8 h (IQR 3-22) after admission for 24.5 h (IQR 13-60). After initiation of TFM-NIV-NAVA, oxygenation improved significantly as early as 1 h after initiation, whereas transcutaneous CO2 values remained stable. None of the patients needed to be intubated and there was no episode of TFM discontinuation due to interface discomfort or other unwanted side effects. Sedation was used in all patients with high proportion of intravenous dexmedetomidine. Median ventilatory assistance duration was 2.5 days (IQR 2-4) and median PICU stay was 4.5 (IQR 3-6). Conclusion: In infants with severe RSV-induced bronchiolitis, respiratory support with TFM-NIV-NAVA seems to be feasible as a rescue therapy and might be considered in selected patients. What is Known: ⢠Bronchiolitic patients with NIV support failure may require invasive mechanical ventilation. ⢠Interface related complications, especially facial sores, can be a cause of NIV failure. What is New: ⢠Total face mask with non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (TFM-NIV-NAVA) seems feasible as a rescue therapy in deteriorating patients with CPAP or NIV failure. ⢠TFM-NIV-NAVA can improve oxygenation rapidly in patients with aggravating hypoxemia and seems to be well tolerated.
Asunto(s)
Soporte Ventilatorio Interactivo , Máscaras , Ventilación no Invasiva , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Lactante , Masculino , Femenino , Ventilación no Invasiva/métodos , Soporte Ventilatorio Interactivo/métodos , Recién Nacido , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/terapia , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/complicaciones , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Bronquiolitis/terapia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is limited literature regarding family and staff experiences of participating in clinical trials. A qualitative study was embedded in the NAVABronch feasibility trial evaluating the effectiveness of a novel mode of ventilation, neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA), in infants with acute viral bronchiolitis. AIM: The aim of this qualitative study was to explore the experiences of parents and health care practitioners (HCPs) involved in the NAVABronch Trial. STUDY DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with two parents and two focus groups were held with six HCPs. RESULTS: Four themes were identified from the focus groups: (1) Creating staff engagement, (2) Education to deliver NAVA, (3) Normalizing NAVA in clinical practice (4) Creating meaningful study outcomes and (5) support of parents during the trial, this theme was generated from the parent interviews. The findings indicated the need for education regarding NAVA for HCPs which would lead to increased confidence, better guidance around the use of NAVA and the need for NAVA to be normalized and embedded into the unit culture. Parents identified the need for further support around preparation for what may happen as a result of the interventions, particularly the weaning of sedation. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that staff and parents had no concerns regarding the trial methods and procedures. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Conducting clinical trials in Paediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs) is challenging and complex. There is limited literature regarding family and staff experiences of participating in clinical trials. Understanding their experiences is crucial in ensuring trial success.
Asunto(s)
Bronquiolitis Viral , Estudios de Factibilidad , Grupos Focales , Padres , Investigación Cualitativa , Humanos , Padres/psicología , Padres/educación , Masculino , Lactante , Femenino , Bronquiolitis Viral/terapia , Soporte Ventilatorio Interactivo/métodos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Enfermedad AgudaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Invasive mechanical ventilation contributes to bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), the most common complication of prematurity and the leading respiratory cause of childhood morbidity. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) may limit invasive ventilation exposure and can be either synchronized or non-synchronized (NS). Pooled data suggest synchronized forms may be superior. Non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA) delivers NIV synchronized to the neural signal for breathing, which is detected with a specialized catheter. The DIVA (Diaphragmatic Initiated Ventilatory Assist) trial aims to determine in infants born 240/7-276/7 weeks' gestation undergoing extubation whether NIV-NAVA compared to non-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NS-NIPPV) reduces the incidence of extubation failure within 5 days of extubation. METHODS: This is a prospective, unblinded, pragmatic, multicenter phase III randomized clinical trial. Inclusion criteria are preterm infants 24-276/7 weeks gestational age who were intubated within the first 7 days of life for at least 12 h and are undergoing extubation in the first 28 postnatal days. All sites will enter an initial run-in phase, where all infants are allocated to NIV-NAVA, and an independent technical committee assesses site performance. Subsequently, all enrolled infants are randomized to NIV-NAVA or NS-NIPPV at extubation. The primary outcome is extubation failure within 5 days of extubation, defined as any of the following: (1) rise in FiO2 at least 20% from pre-extubation for > 2 h, (2) pH ≤ 7.20 or pCO2 ≥ 70 mmHg; (3) > 1 apnea requiring positive pressure ventilation (PPV) or ≥ 6 apneas requiring stimulation within 6 h; (4) emergent intubation for cardiovascular instability or surgery. Our sample size of 478 provides 90% power to detect a 15% absolute reduction in the primary outcome. Enrolled infants will be followed for safety and secondary outcomes through 36 weeks' postmenstrual age, discharge, death, or transfer. DISCUSSION: The DIVA trial is the first large multicenter trial designed to assess the impact of NIV-NAVA on relevant clinical outcomes for preterm infants. The DIVA trial design incorporates input from clinical NAVA experts and includes innovative features, such as a run-in phase, to ensure consistent technical performance across sites. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov , trial identifier NCT05446272 , registered July 6, 2022.
Asunto(s)
Soporte Ventilatorio Interactivo , Ventilación no Invasiva , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Ventilación con Presión Positiva Intermitente/efectos adversos , Recien Nacido Extremadamente Prematuro , Soporte Ventilatorio Interactivo/efectos adversos , Soporte Ventilatorio Interactivo/métodos , Extubación Traqueal/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Ventilación no Invasiva/efectos adversos , Ventilación no Invasiva/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como AsuntoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the difference in the rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in very low birth weight infants before and after the introduction of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA). STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study comparing rates of Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) before and after implementation of NAVA. Eligibility criteria included all very low birth weight VLBW neonates needing ventilation. For analysis, each cohort was divided into three subgroups based on gestational age. Changes in the rate of BPD, length of stay, tracheostomy rates, invasive ventilator days, and home oxygen therapy were compared. RESULTS: There were no differences in the incidence of BPD in neonates at 23-25 6/7 weeks' and 29-32 weeks' gestation between the two cohorts. A higher incidence of BPD was seen in the 26-28 5/7 weeks' gestation NAVA subgroup compared to controls (86% vs. 68%, p = 0.05). No significant difference was found for ventilator days, but infants in the 26-28 6/7 subgroup in the NAVA cohort had a longer length of stay (98 ± 34 days vs. 82 ± 24 days, p = 0.02), a higher percentage discharged on home oxygen therapy (45% vs. 18%, respectively, p = 0.006), and higher tracheostomy rates (3/36 vs. 0/60, p = 0.02), compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The NAVA mode was not associated with a reduction in BPD when compared to other modes of ventilation. Unexpected increases were seen in BPD rates, home oxygen therapy rates, tracheostomy rates, and the length of stay in the NAVA subgroup born at 26-28 6/7 weeks' gestation.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) is a mode of mechanical ventilation that delivers oxygen pressures in proportion to electrical signals of the diaphragm. The proportional assistance can be adjusted by the clinician to reduce the patient's work of breathing. Several case series of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernias (CDH) have shown that NAVA may reduce oxygenation index and mean airway pressures. To date, no clinical trial has compared NAVA to standard methods of mechanical ventilation for babies with CDH. METHODS: The aim of this dual-centre randomised cross-over trial is to compare post-operative NAVA with assist control ventilation (ACV) for infants with CDH. If eligible, infants will be enrolled for a ventilatory support tolerance trial (VSTT) to assess their suitability for randomisation. If clinically stable during the VSTT, infants will be randomised to receive either NAVA or ACV first in a 1:1 ratio for a 4-h period. The oxygenation index, respiratory severity score and cumulative sedative medication use will be measured. DISCUSSION: Retrospective studies comparing NAVA to ACV in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia have shown the ventilatory mode may improve respiratory parameters and benefit neonates. To our knowledge, this is the first prospective cross-over trial comparing NAVA to ACV. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NAN-C was prospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05839340 Registered on May 2023.
Asunto(s)
Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas , Soporte Ventilatorio Interactivo , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Estudios Cruzados , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/diagnóstico , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/terapia , Soporte Ventilatorio Interactivo/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
The noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA) is a newly developed noninvasive ventilation technique with promising clinical and ventilatory outcomes for preterm infants. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate whether NIV-NAVA has better clinical and ventilatory outcomes than nasal continuous airway pressure (NCPAP) or noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPP) on premature infants. MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared NIV-NAVA with NCPAP or NIPP for preterm infants (gestational age: <37 weeks) were included. We evaluated the following outcomes in the neonatal intensive care unit: the desaturation rate, failure of noninvasive modality requiring intubation when received as the primary mode or the need for re-intubation after extubation from mechanical ventilation in the secondary mode (weaning), length of stay, and fraction of inspired oxygen. The mean difference and risk ratio were used to represent continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively. We included nine RCTs involving 339 preterm infants overall. NIV-NAVA showed similar clinical and ventilatory outcomes to NCPAP or NIPP, except for the maximum diaphragmatic electrical activity. The rate of failure of the noninvasive modality was not statistically different between NIV-NAVA and NCPAP. The pooled estimates for the maximum electrical activity were significantly reduced in NIV-NAVA compared with those in NIPP. The findings suggest that NIV-NAVA may be as safe and effective as NCPAP and NIPP for preterm neonates, particularly those who may not tolerate these alternative noninvasive methods. However, further trials are recommended for greater evidence.
RESUMEN
This observational study evaluated the validity of end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) as a surrogate for arterial PCO2 (PaCO2) in infants on neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA), particularly considering the influence of variable spontaneous breathing on capnography waveforms. The study involved 16 infants, analyzing 50 paired ETCO2 and PaCO2 values. Deming regression analysis highlighted a notably stronger correlation for maximum ETCO2 (r2 = 0.6783, p <0.0001) compared to mean ETCO2 (r2 = 0.5686, p <0.0001) and demonstrated a significantly weaker association for minimum ETCO2 (r2 = 0.1838). These findings emphasize the superior predictive value of maximum ETCO2 in estimating PaCO2, advocating its reliable use in clinical monitoring, especially given the dynamic capnography associated with NAVA's variable pressures. The results suggest ETCO2's potential to enhance noninvasive respiratory management, reduce the frequency of blood sampling, and improve overall care for infants requiring mechanical ventilation.
RESUMEN
Background: Neonates with apnea of prematurity (AOP) clinically deteriorate because continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) provides inadequate support during apnea. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) provides proportional ventilator support from the electrical activity of the diaphragm. When the NAVA level is 0â cmH2O/mcV (NAVA-PAP), patients receive CPAP when breathing and backup ventilation when apneic. This study evaluates NAVA-PAP and time spent in backup ventilation. Methods: This was a prospective, two-center, observational study of preterm neonates on NAVA-PAP for AOP. Ventilator data were downloaded after 24â h. The number of clinically significant events (CSEs) was collected. A paired t-test was used to perform statistical analysis. Results: The study was conducted on 28 patients with a gestational age of 25 ± 1.8 weeks and a study age of 28 ± 23 days. The number of CSEs was 4 ± 4.39/24â h. The patients were on NAVA-PAP for approximately 90%/min, switched to backup mode 2.5 ± 1.1 times/min, and spent 10.6 ± 7.2% in backup. Conclusion: Preterm neonates on NAVA-PAP had few CSEs with minimal time in backup ventilation.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) is an adaptive ventilation mode that recognizes electromyographic diaphragmatic activation as a sensory input to control the ventilator. NAVA may be of interest in prolonged mechanical ventilation and weaning, as it provides effort-adapted support, improves patient-ventilator synchronization, and allows additional monitoring of neuromuscular function and drive. Ventricular assist devices (VAD), especially for the left ventricle (LVAD), are increasingly entering clinical practice, and intensivists are faced with distinct challenges such as the interaction between the system and other measures of organ support. CASE PRESENTATION: We present two cases in which a NAVA mode was intended to support ventilator weaning in patients with recent LVAD implantation (HeartMate III®). However, in these patients, the electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi) could not be used to control the ventilator, because the LVAD current detected by the catheter superposed the Edi current, making usage of this mode impossible. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: An implanted LVAD can render the NAVA signal unusable for ventilatory support because the LVAD signal can interfere with the recording of electromyographic activation of the diaphragm. Therefore, patients with implanted LVAD may need other modes of ventilation than NAVA for advanced weaning strategies.
Asunto(s)
Corazón Auxiliar , Soporte Ventilatorio Interactivo , Humanos , Ventrículos Cardíacos , Respiración Artificial , Diafragma/fisiología , CatéteresRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist mode (NAVA) benefit in mechanical ventilation (MV) patients with regard to clinically outcomes is still uncertain. Recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have addressed this issue, making it important to assess the real impact of NAVA in relation to these outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing NAVA ventilation mode versus the standard ventilation mode in critically ill adult patients admitted to the ICU with invasive MV. The main outcome was 28-days ventilatory free-days (VFD). Secondary outcomes were weaning failure, mortality, ICU and hospital length of stay and need for tracheostomy. RESULTS: We included 5 RCTs (643 patients). The patients in the NAVA group had increased VFDs compared to the control group: mean difference (MD) 3.42 (95% CI 1.21 to 5.62, I2 = 0%). NAVA and control groups did not differ in ICU mortality [OR 0.58 (95% CI 0.33 to 1.03), I2 = 41%]. NAVA mode was associated with a reduced incidence of weaning failure [OR 0.51 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.88), I2 = 0%]. NAVA and control groups did not differ in the number of MV days: MD -1.9 days (95% CI -4.2 to 0.3, I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: NAVA mode has a modest impact on MV-free days and weaning success, with no association with improvements in other relevant clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Soporte Ventilatorio Interactivo , Respiración Artificial , Adulto , Humanos , Desconexión del Ventilador , Traqueostomía , HospitalizaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) is a ventilatory mode that delivers synchronized ventilation, proportional to the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi). Although it has been proposed in infants with a congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), the diaphragmatic defect and the surgical repair could alter the physiology of the diaphragm. AIM: To evaluate, in a pilot study, the relationship between the respiratory drive (EAdi) and the respiratory effort in neonates with CDH during the postsurgical period under either NAVA ventilation or conventional ventilation (CV). METHODS: This prospective physiological study included eight neonates admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit with a diagnosis of CDH. EAdi, esophageal, gastric, and transdiaphragmatic pressure, as well as clinical parameters, were recorded during NAVA and CV (synchronized intermittent mandatory pressure ventilation) in the postsurgical period. RESULTS: EAdi was detectable and there was a correlation between the ΔEAdi (maximal - minimal values) and the transdiaphragmatic pressure (r = 0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.222; 0.299]). There was no significant difference in terms of clinical or physiological parameters during NAVA compared to CV, including work of breathing. CONCLUSION: Respiratory drive and effort were correlated in infants with CDH and therefore NAVA is a suitable proportional mode in this population. EAdi can also be used to monitor the diaphragm for individualized support.
Asunto(s)
Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas , Soporte Ventilatorio Interactivo , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/cirugía , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Diafragma/fisiología , Frecuencia Respiratoria , Respiración ArtificialRESUMEN
PURPOSE: No study has compared neurally adjusted ventilator assist (NAVA) with adaptive support ventilation (ASV) during non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in subjects with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, we compared NAVA-NIV with ASV-NIV for delivering NIV in consecutive subjects with AECOPD. The primary outcome was NIV failure rate (invasive mechanical ventilation). The key secondary outcomes were number of NIV manipulations, asynchrony index, and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: We enrolled 76 subjects (NAVA-NIV, n = 36, ASV-NIV, n = 40; 74% males) with a mean ± SD age of 61.4 ± 8.2 years. We found no difference in NIV failure rates between the two arms (NAVA-NIV vs. ASV-NIV; 8/36 [22.2%] vs. 8/40 [20%]; p = 0.83). The median physician manipulations for NIV were significantly less in the ASV-NIV arm than in the NAVA-NIV arm (2 [0.8-4] vs. 3 [2-5]; p= 0.014) during the initial 24-h. We found no difference in median asynchrony index (NAVA-NIV vs. ASV-NIV, 16.6% vs. 16.4%, p = 0.5) and 90-day mortality (22.2% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.67). CONCLUSION: The use of NAVA-NIV was not superior to ASV-NIV in reducing NIV failure rates in AECOPD. Both NAVA-NIV and ASV-NIV had similar asynchrony index and 90-day mortality. TRIAL REGISTRY: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (NCT04414891).
Asunto(s)
Soporte Ventilatorio Interactivo , Ventilación no Invasiva , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Respiración Artificial , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Ventiladores MecánicosRESUMEN
Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) and non-invasive (NIV)-NAVA are innovative modes of synchronized and proportional respiratory support. They can synchronize with the patients' breathing and promote patient comfort. Both techniques are increasingly being used these years, however experience with their use in newborns and premature infants in Taiwan is relatively few. Because increasing evidence supports the use of NAVA and NIV-NAVA in newborns and premature infants requiring respiratory assist to achieve better synchrony, the aim of this article is to discuss whether NAVA can provide better synchronization and comfort for ventilated newborns and premature babies. In a review of recent literature, we found that NAVA and NIV-NAVA appear to be superior to conventional invasive and non-invasive ventilation. Nevertheless, some of the benefits are controversial. For example, treatment failure in premature infants is common due to insufficient triggering of electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi) and frequent apnea, highlighting the differences between premature infants and adults in settings and titration. Further, we suggest how to adjust the settings of NAVA and NIV-NAVA in premature infants to reduce clinical adverse events and extubation failure. In addition to assist in the use of NAVA, EAdi can also serve as a continuous and real-time monitor of vital signs, assisting physicians in the administration of sedatives, evaluation of successful extubation, and as a reference for the patient's respiratory condition during special procedures.
Asunto(s)
Soporte Ventilatorio Interactivo , Ventilación no Invasiva , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Soporte Ventilatorio Interactivo/métodos , Respiración Artificial , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Ventilación no Invasiva/métodos , DiafragmaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The physiological response and the potentially beneficial effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) for lung protection and optimization of ventilation during spontaneous breathing in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are not fully understood. The aim of the study was to compare the effect of different PEEP levels on tidal volume distribution and on the ventilation of dependent lung region during neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA). METHODS: ARDS-like lung injury was induced by using saline lavage in 10 anesthetized and spontaneously breathing farm-bred pigs. The animals were ventilated in NAVA modality and tidal volume distribution as well as dependent lung ventilation were assessed using electric impedance tomography during the application of PEEP levels from 0 to 15 cmH20, in steps of 3 cmH20. Tidal volume distribution and dependent fraction of ventilation were analysed using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Furthermore, airway, esophageal and transpulmonary pressure, as well as airway flow and delivered volume, were continuously measured during the assisted spontaneous breathing. RESULTS: Increasing PEEP improved oxygenation and re-distributed tidal volume. Specifically, ventilation distribution changed from a predominant non-dependent to a more even distribution between non-dependent and dependent areas of the lung. Dependent fraction of ventilation reached 47 ± 9% at PEEP 9 cmH20. Further increasing PEEP led to a predominant dependent ventilation. CONCLUSION: During assisted spontaneous breathing in this model of induced ARDS, PEEP modifies the distribution of ventilation and can achieve a homogenizing effect on its spatial arrangement. The study indicates that PEEP is an important factor during assisted spontaneous breathing and that EIT can be of valuable interest when titrating PEEP level during spontaneous breathing, by indicating the most homogeneous distribution of gas volumes throughout the PEEP spectrum.
Asunto(s)
Soporte Ventilatorio Interactivo , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Porcinos , Animales , Volumen de Ventilación Pulmonar , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Respiración ArtificialRESUMEN
Resumo O artigo analisa um aspecto pouco conhecido da trajetória de Pedro Nava: seu envolvimento na institucionalização da reumatologia no Brasil. Por meio de uma gama de materiais de arquivo, como revistas médicas, correspondência, cadernetas, relatórios técnicos e matérias de jornal, procura recuperar diversos mecanismos mobilizados por Nava no movimento de legitimação de uma nova área da medicina no Brasil a partir dos anos 1940. Como se busca demonstrar, seus esforços incluíram a criação de redes no exterior, a fundação de departamentos, a participação ativa no periódico Brasil Médico , o desenvolvimento de um léxico próprio para a reumatologia, relações com o Estado e a criação de associações.
Abstract A little-known facet of the trajectory of Pedro Nava is analyzed, namely, his involvement in the institutionalization of rheumatology in Brazil. Drawing on multiple primary sources, including medical journals, correspondence, notebooks, technical reports, and newspaper stories, the range of mechanisms Nava galvanized in the effort to legitimize this new area of medicine in Brazil as of the 1940s are shown. These include his efforts to forge networks outside the country, create new departments, take active part in the journal Brasil Médico, develop a specialized lexicon for rheumatology, liaise with the State, and found new associations.
Asunto(s)
Reumatología , Historia de la Medicina , Institucionalización , Antropología Cultural , Brasil , Historia del Siglo XXRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) can have complex respiratory problems which are worsened by ventilatory induced lung injury. Neurally adjusted ventilator assist (NAVA) is a potentially promising ventilation mode for this population, as it can result in improved patient-ventilator interactions and provision of adequate gas exchange at lower airway pressures. CONTENT: A literature review was undertaken to provide an overview of NAVA and examine its role in the management of infants with CDH. SUMMARY: NAVA in neonates has been used in CDH infants who were stable on ventilatory support or being weaned from mechanical ventilation and was associated with a reduction in the level of respiratory support. OUTLOOK: There is, however, limited evidence regarding the efficacy of NAVA in infants with CDH, with only short-term benefits being investigated. A prospective, multicentre study with long term follow-up is required to appropriately assess NAVA in this population.
Asunto(s)
Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas , Soporte Ventilatorio Interactivo , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/complicaciones , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Respiración Artificial , Estudios Multicéntricos como AsuntoRESUMEN
Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is the major cause of respiratory failure in preterm infants due to immature lung development and surfactant deficiency. Although the concepts and methods of managing respiratory problems in neonates have changed continuously, determining appropriate respiratory treatment with minimal ventilation-induced lung injury and complications is crucially important. This review summarizes neonatal respiratory therapy's advances and available strategies (i.e., exogenous surfactant therapy, noninvasive ventilation, and different ventilation modes), focusing on RDS management.
Asunto(s)
Soporte Ventilatorio Interactivo , Ventilación no Invasiva , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria del Recién Nacido , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria del Recién Nacido/terapia , TensoactivosRESUMEN
Preterm infants treated with invasive ventilation are often affected by bronchopulmonary dysplasia, brain structure alterations, and later neurodevelopmental impairment. We studied the implementation of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) and high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in a level III neonatal unit, and its effects on pulmonary and central nervous system outcomes. This retrospective cohort study included 193 surviving infants born below 32 weeks of gestation in preimplementation (2007-2008) and postimplementation (2016-2017) periods in a single study center in Finland. The proportion of infants requiring invasive ventilation decreased from 67% in the pre- to 48% in the postimplementation period (p = 0.009). Among infants treated with invasive ventilation, 68% were treated with NAVA after its implementation. At the same time, the duration of invasive ventilation of infants born at or below 28 weeks increased threefold compared with the preimplementation period (p = 0.042). The postimplementation period was characterized by a gradual replacement of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) with HFNC, earlier discontinuation of nCPAP, but a longer duration of positive pressure support. The proportion of normal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings at term corrected age increased from 62% to 84% (p = 0.018). Cognitive outcome improved by one standard score between the study periods (p = 0.019). NAVA was used as the primary mode of ventilation in the postimplementation period. During this period, invasive ventilation time was significantly prolonged. HFNC led to a decrease in the use of nCPAP. The change in the respiratory support might have contributed to the improvement in brain MRI findings and cognitive outcomes.