Crosswalking 4 Pain Impact Measures in a Nationally Representative Sample of Adults With Back Pain.

OBJECTIVE: To generate crosswalk equations and tables for 4 pain impact measures: the Impact Stratification Score (ISS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and the Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity Scale (PEG). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey assessing demographics and pain impact. Crosswalks were developed using item-response theory (IRT) cocalibrations and linear regressions between the ISS, ODI, RMDQ, and PEG. SETTING: Online panel. PARTICIPANTS: Population-based sample of United States adults aged 18 and older. Eligibility criteria were reporting current back pain, not reporting 2 fake health conditions, and having data for 2 or more pain measures (N=1530; 37% of sample). Crosswalks were developed (n=1030) and cross-validated in a subsample of 500 participants (n=125 randomly sampled from each ISS quartile). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ISS, ODI, RMDQ, and the PEG. RESULTS: Associations of the ISS with the PEG and ODI met the criteria for IRT cocalibration. Other measure pairs were crosswalked using regression. Associations were strongest between the PEG and the ISS (r=0.87, normalized mean absolute error [NMAE]=0.38) and between the ODI and the ISS (r=0.85, NMAE=0.39). Associations were weakest between the PEG and the RMDQ (r=0.69, R2=0.48, NMAE: 0.55-0.58). Regression equations and IRT accounted for 48%-64% of the variance (NMAE: 0.38-0.58) in corresponding pain measures in the cross-validation sample. CONCLUSIONS: The crosswalks between the ISS and common legacy pain measures created in this study of a nationally representative sample of United States adults with back pain can be used to estimate 1 pain impact measure from another. Further evaluation in clinical samples is recommended.

Expectations in patients undergoing spine surgery are high and unmet.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Defining success in spine surgery lacks a standardized approach, and all existing concepts are based on registrations after surgery. PURPOSE: To examine patients' expectations before spine surgery assessed by a modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The authors asked: how do the expectations align with actual outcomes and can a patient's individual expectations be used as a success criterion in itself? STUDY DESIGN /SETTING: Prospective single-center study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients scheduled for spine surgery at Akershus University Hospital (AHUS) were included in the study. They underwent 1 of 3 procedures: decompression for spinal stenosis, disc removal for lumbar disc herniation, or spinal fusion for degenerative disc disease. OUTCOME MEASURES: Modified and standard version of ODI and NRS (back and leg pain). METHODS: Preoperatively, the patients were given a modified ODI and NRS questionnaire in which they were asked to register the minimum acceptable functional impairment and pain they anticipated to have postsurgery. The patients' expectations were compared with 3-and 12-month follow-up data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine) with ODI, NRS and Global Perceived Effect (GPE) scale. We used simple descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 93 patients completed the pre-op questionnaire. Of these, 65 responded to the 3-month follow-up and 53 at 12-month follow-up. The mean (95%CI) ODI before surgery was 38.3 (34.2-42.3), the mean (95% CI) preoperative NRS back pain was 6.34 (5.81-6.88), and leg pain was 6.67 (6.08-7.26). The patients expected a mean (95% CI) ODI of 10.5 (7.5-13.5), mean (95%CI) NRS back pain of 2.5 (2.1-3.0), and NRS leg pain of 1.8 (1.5-2.2). The actual clinical outcome after 12 months were a mean (95% CI) ODI of 21.7 (17.0-26.5), NRS back pain of 3.4 (2.8-4.1), and leg pain of 2.8 (2.0-3.5). Only 12 (30.8%) patients achieved their expected ODI, while 26 (65.0%) classified themselves as significantly better according to GPE. CONCLUSIONS: Patients seem to have high expectations before spine surgery, and the expectations may exceed the clinical outcome. Only 30.8% had their ODI expectations met, but perceived benefit was higher. High expectations may be due to inadequate preoperative information and/or the unsuitability of ODI for capturing expectations.

Efficacy of endoscopic decompression surgery for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Background: The overall aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of endoscopic decompression for outcomes in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort, single-institution study of n = 139 patients from 2019 to 2022 who underwent endoscopic decompression for LSS. The primary outcome was improvement of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) between baseline and 12-month follow-up. Results: In the present sample (n = 139) the average age was 57.6 years (SD = 17.4, with even distribution of men (49%) vs. women (51%). In patients with LSS, lumbar disc herniation was the most common diagnosis in 49 patients followed by lumbar radiculopathy in 25 patients. Lumbar radicular pain was the 3rd most common diagnosis in 21 patients with all other diagnosis listed in Table S1. There was a significant improvement (i.e., decrease) in ODI following endoscopic decompression (mean change: -8.3, 95% CI: -9.4, -7.2, P < 0.001, Fig. 1). Prior lumbar spine surgery (P = 0.048), BMI (P = 0.053), and age (P = 0.022) were associated with changes in ODI. Nearly half (47%) of the sample had prior lumbar spine surgery. Those with prior lumbar spine surgery (-7.5, 95% CI: -8.3, -6.6) showed less improvement than those without prior lumbar spine surgery (-9.1, 95% CI: -10.9, -7.2, Fig. 2). For BMI, 23% had normal BMI while 24% were overweight and 53% were obese. Patients with normal BMI (-10.3, 95% CI: -13.4, -7.2) showed greater improvements compared to overweight (-7.9, 95% CI: -9.4, -6.4) and obese (-7.6, 95% CI: -9.0, -6.3, Fig. 3) patients. Patients under 40 years old (-10.2, 95% CI: -13.6, -6.8) showed greater improvements in ODI compared to those 40 years and older (-7.8, 95% CI: -8.6, -6.8, Fig. 4). Conclusions: In patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, endoscopic decompression was associated with reduced disability. Patients with no prior lumbar spine surgery, normal BMI, and who were under 40 years old showed greater improvements.

Hypertension-Mediated Organ Damage in Relation to Severity of Chronic Low Back Pain in Hypertensive Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pain triggers a stress response, which results in increased blood pressure (BP). We investigated whether chronic low back pain (cLBP) in hypertensive patients is associated with an increased risk of hypertension-related organ damage. METHODS: We studied 85 consecutive hypertensive patients with a median age of 62 years (55-67), who suffered from cLBP, the severity of which was evaluated according to the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography, arterial ultrasonography and vascular tonometry. We assessed carotid artery atherosclerotic plaques, along with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) and left ventricular mass index (LVMI). RESULTS: An equal to or higher than median (16 points) ODI score in 48 subjects (56.5%) was associated with the presence of carotid artery plaques (p = 0.014). In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for covariates, the presence of carotid artery plaques remained independently associated with an ODI score equal to or higher than the median (OR, 3.71; 95% CI, 1.04-13.25; p = 0.044). None of the other analyzed parameters of hypertension-related organ damage demonstrated a significant relationship with the ODI score. CONCLUSIONS: We observed that more severe cLBP is associated with a higher prevalence of carotid artery atherosclerotic plaques among hypertensive patients.

Prospective Assessment of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) in Spondylolisthesis: A Radiological and Functional Outcome Study in an Indian Population.

INTRODUCTION:  Spondylolisthesis is a common spinal condition in which one vertebra slips over another, leading to pain and disability. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) has emerged as a surgical option for addressing spondylolisthesis; however, limited research exists, especially in the Indian context, evaluating its radiological and functional outcomes. OBJECTIVE:  The study aimed to evaluate the radiological and functional outcomes of TLIF in spondylolisthesis using standardized scoring systems, to evaluate the sagittal balance of the spine radiologically in patients who have undergone TLIF for spondylolisthesis, and to evaluate the correlation between the functional and radiological outcomes after TLIF. METHODS:  This prospective observational study included spondylolisthesis patients undergoing TLIF at SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre from August 2022 to August 2024. Criteria included Meyerding grade 1-4 spondylolisthesis, single-segment fusion, and willingness for 12-month follow-up. RESULTS:  Forty-five patients were included with age 36.6 ± 12.2 years, with 73.3% being female. L4-L5 is the most common level affected in 21 patients (46.7%). Significant improvements were observed in pelvic tilt 19.07 ± 2.05, sacral slope 30.6 ± 4.4, segmental lordosis 18.4 ± 1.4, lumbar lordosis 57.1 ± 1.8, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) 2.5 ± 0.3, Visual Analog Scale for pain 0.4 ± 0.5, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores 5.23 ± 2.6 postoperatively (p < 0.05). At one-year follow-up, 84.4% of patients had good-to-excellent outcomes, and 44.4% had definitive fusion according to modified Lee criteria. However, there was no correlation between ODI score and grade of listhesis, pelvic incidence (PI), or SVA of the spine (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION:  This study provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of TLIF surgery in addressing spondylolisthesis, both in terms of radiological and functional outcomes. However, there was no correlation between improvement in functional and radiological parameters (PI vs. ODI, SVA vs. ODI). TLIF appears to offer significant improvements in patient well-being and quality of life. These findings contribute to understanding TLIF's suitability as a treatment for spondylolisthesis and can inform clinical practice, ultimately benefiting patients suffering from this condition.

The disaggregation of the oswestry disability index in patients undergoing lumbar surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), is a widely used patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for assessing functional status in individuals with lumbar spine pathology. The ODI is used by surgeons to determine the initial status and monitor progress after surgery. Compiled ODI data enables comparisons between different surgical techniques. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) often causes symptoms such as back pain and neurogenic claudication affecting quality of life and activities of daily living captured by the ODI. Despite extensive studies on ODI changes after spinal surgery, little is known about the characteristics and changes in the different ODI subsections. PURPOSE: To analyze the baseline characteristics and changes in total ODI and ODI subsections 2 years after elective lumbar surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis on patients prospectively enrolled who underwent spinal surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis from 2016 to 2018. The ODI was assessed preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 265 patients were included in the study, 60% were female. The mean age of the patients was 67±8 years, and the mean BMI was 30±6 kg/m2. OUTCOME MEASURES: The analysis considered the differences in ODI scores before and after surgery, as well as the changes in all ODI subsections 2 years after elective lumbar surgery for DLS. METHODS: The analysis evaluated differences in ODI scores and variations in different subsections. Patients without an ODI follow-up at 2 years were excluded from the study. The study utilized the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test for all prepost paired samples. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for sex and procedure comparisons for overall ODI and ODI subsection analysis. Univariate linear regression was applied for overall and subsection specific ODI outcomes with age and BMI as independent variables, respectively. The statistical significance level was set at p<.05. RESULTS: Improvement in ODI was observed in 242 patients (91%). The highest baseline disability values were found for the questions regarding pain intensity (3.4±1.3), lifting (3.2±1.9), and standing (3.4±1.3). The lowest preoperative functional limitations were observed in sleeping (1.6±1.3), personal care (1.6±1.4), traveling (1.6±1.2) and sitting (1.5±1.4). At the 2-year follow-up, there was significant improvement in all questions and the overall ODI (all p<.001). The ODI subsections that showed the greatest absolute improvements were changing degree of pain (-2.6), with 89% of patients experiencing improvement, standing (-2.4) with 87% of patients experiencing improvement, and pain intensity (-2.1) with 81% of patients experiencing improvement. The subsections with the least improvement were personal care (-0.6), sitting (-0.7), and sleeping (-0.9). The study found that female patients had a significantly higher preoperative disability in various subsections but showed greater improvement in total ODI compared to male patients (p=.001). Additionally, improvement in sitting (p<.001), traveling (p<.001), social life (p<.001) and sleeping (p=.018) were significantly higher in female patients. Older patients showed significantly less improvement in sitting (p=.005) and sleeping (p=.002). A higher BMI was significantly associated with less improvement in changing degree of pain (p=.025) and higher baseline disability in various subsections. Patients who underwent decompression and fusion had significantly higher baseline disability in several subsections compared to those who underwent decompression alone. There was no significant difference between decompression alone and decompression with fusion in terms of overall improvement in the ODI and improvement in the subsections. CONCLUSION: These results offer a more comprehensive understanding of ODI and its changes across different subsections. This insight is invaluable for improving preoperative education and effectively managing patient expectations regarding potential postsurgery disability in specific areas.

A breakthrough in lumbar surgery: ipsilateral interlaminar endoscopy and its impact on spinal stability and patient outcomes.

Lumbar stenosis (LS) often leads to debilitating symptoms due to nerve compression in the spinal canal. As this condition becomes increasingly prevalent among the elderly, innovative surgical techniques are crucial. This letter examines a recent advancement introduced by Marco Aurélio Moscatelli et al., who have developed an ipsilateral interlaminar endoscopic approach for decompression at the L5-S1 level. Their study, involving 30 patients with degenerative stenosis, reports significant improvements in quality-of-life metrics, including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scales (VAS) for pain. The new approach not only overcomes anatomical challenges specific to the L5-S1 region but also offers enhanced visualization and extensive decompression without destabilizing the spine. This letter highlights the promising results of this technique, the utility of the FAPDIS algorithm in guiding surgical choices, and the broader implications for minimally invasive lumbar surgery. The findings underscore a potential shift towards more effective and safer interventions for lumbar stenosis, paving the way for better patient outcomes in spinal decompression.

Describing functional low back pain disability in the American population: a crowd-sourced evaluation of the Oswestry disability index.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The Oswestry disability index (ODI) is widely utilized as a patient reported outcome (PRO) tool to assess patients presenting with low back pain (LBP) and following thoracolumbar spine surgery. No primary study has calculated the baseline range of ODI values in the diverse American population. Establishing age-adjusted normative values for ODI in the American population is crucial for assessing the utility of treatment strategies. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to describe the baseline range of functional low back disability as measured by the ODI in an American population. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Cross-sectional observational study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 1214 participants were recruited from the United States in January 2024 using a combination of the Connect and PrimePanel platforms by CloudResearch to complete a survey administered on a RedCap online database. The survey consisted of 10 demographic questions and the 10 ODI survey questions. The distribution of the survey was designed to obtain approximately 100 respondents in each of the following age groups: 18-29, 30 to 39, 40 to 49, 50 to 59, 60 to 69, 70 to 79, and 80 to 89. The distribution of the sample was similarly designed to match the United States Census racial data with 78.1% White, 13.9% Black, and 7.9% other. OUTCOME MEASURES: Oswestry disability index (ODI). METHODS: A crowd-sourcing platform called Cloudresearch was used to collect a representative sample of the US population by answering questions of the Oswestry disability questionnaire (ODQ), a 10-question survey. RESULTS: The final sample size was 797 participants including 386 (48.4%) males and 411 (51.6%) females; 169 participants were excluded that did not complete the survey and an additional 248 were excluded for failing attention check questions. The overall mean ODI score for the combined age groups was 14.35 (95% CI [13.33, 15.37]). The mean ODI scores increased with age, with the highest mean ODI in ages 70 to 79 at 18.0 (95% CI [14.76, 21.24]). Female participants reported higher mean ODI scores than their male counterparts in the 18 to 29 age group (p=.01), 50 to 59 age group (p=.01), and 60 to 69 age group (p=.02). Additionally, a weak positive correlation was found between Body Mass Index (BMI) and ODI scores (r = 0.22, p<.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate a clear trend of increased disability with age. This study describes the baseline range of functional low back pain disability in the United States population. By defining these parameters, healthcare professionals can better tailor age and sex-specific interventions to manage disability in the aging US population, ultimately improving patient care and both operative and nonoperative treatment plans for LBP-related thoracolumbar pathology.

Anterior Spinal Fusion for Thoraco-Lumbar Idiopathic Scoliosis Comparing Less Invasive Concave versus Traditional Convex Approach: A Pilot Study.

Background/Objectives: Anterior spinal fusion for primary thoracolumbar or lumbar (TL/L) adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, AIS, has advantages over posterior fusion, particularly in saving motion segments below the fusion construct. Traditionally, the approach is anterolaterally from the convexity. In adult degenerative scoliosis, the lateral or anterolateral approach may be performed from the traditional or from the concave approach which is less invasive and gives comparable outcomes. The purpose of the present pilot study was to assess the feasibility of the less invasive concave approach for younger AIS patients and compare it to the traditional convex approach over a 5-year follow-up period. Methods: The two cohorts were assessed by comparing pre- to postoperative radiographs, and clinical outcomes for pain, function, self-perception of appearance, and opinion of surgical success were prospectively obtained. Results: Radiographs found that primary TL/L scoliosis significantly improved from 53° to 18° (65%) for both the concave and convex cohorts. Sagittal alignments remained stable and there was no difference between cohorts. Coronal balance improved in both cohorts and sagittal balance was stable for both. Clinically, VAS back pain improved significantly for both cohorts initially and remained improved in the concave group. Leg pain, pain drawing, ODI disability, and VAS appearance scores improved and there was no difference between cohorts. The self-rating of success of the procedure was 100% at early and late follow-up periods. There were no neurological/surgical complications. Conclusions: The concave approach for anterior fusion for TL/L AIS is feasible with comparable radiographic and clinical outcomes to the traditional approach.

Prolonged opioid use after single-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery in a Belgian population: a multicentric observational study.

PURPOSE: Lumbar spinal fusion surgeries are increasingly being performed in spinal degenerative disease, often accompanied by perioperative opioid prescriptions. The aim of this study is to analyze prolonged postoperative opioid use following a standardized opioid prescription after single-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery in a Belgian population. METHODS: This prospective, multicentric observational study included patients undergoing single-level lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative disease. A standardized postoperative opioid protocol (Targinact 2 × 10 mg/5 mg, Paracetamol 4 × 1 g and Ibuprofen 3 × 600 mg) was applied uniformly. Prolonged opioid use was defined as continued opioid use six months after surgery. Patient data were collected using the Back-App®. RESULTS: Among 198 participants, 32.8% continued opioid use six months post-surgery, with 8% utilizing strong opioids. Prolonged opioid use correlated with lower pre-operative back pain. Patients with prolonged opioid use and strong opioid use at six months show less improvement in disability compared to patients without prolonged opioid use. Moreover, patients with prolonged strong opioid use tend to have lesser improvement of the low back pain. The odds for prolonged opioid use decrease with the increase of the improvement in ODI. CONCLUSION: 1 in 3 patients undergoing single-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery is at risk for prolonged opioid use. The study underscores the importance of tailored pain management strategies, particularly given the rising prevalence of spinal fusion surgeries. The association between pre-operative low back pain, post-operative improvement in functionality (ODI), and prolonged opioid use emphasizes the need for judicious opioid prescribing practices and highlights the role of functional outcomes in treatment goals.

Responsiveness and minimal important change of specific and generic patient-reported outcome measures for back patients: the Norwegian Neck and Back Register.

PURPOSE: To evaluate responsiveness and minimal important change (MIC) of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), pain during activity on a numeric rating scale (NRSa) and health related quality of life (EQ-5D) based on data from the Norwegian neck and back registry (NNRR). METHODS: A total of 1617 patients who responded to NNRR follow-up after both 6 and 12 months were included in this study. Responsiveness was calculated using standardized response mean and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. We calculated MIC with both an anchor-based and distribution-based method. RESULTS: The condition specific ODI had best responsiveness, the more generic NRSa and EQ-5D had lower responsiveness. We found that the MIC for ODI varied from 3.0 to 9.5, from 0.4 to 2.5 for NRSa while the EQ5D varied from 0.05 to 0.12 depending on the method for calculation. CONCLUSION: In a register based back pain population, the condition specific ODI was more responsive to change than the more generic tools NRSa and EQ5D. The variations in responsiveness and MIC estimates also indicate that they should be regarded as indicative, rather than fixed estimates.

Comparative efficacy of acupuncture, venesection, and physical therapy on chronic low back pain outcomes: a randomized clinical trial.

Objective: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) imposes considerable financial and social burden with poor response to medical and surgical treatments. Alternatively, acupuncture and venesection(Fasd) are traditionally used to alleviate nociceptive and musculoskeletal pains. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of acupuncture and venesection on CLBP and patient functionality. Methods: The current study was a single-blinded, randomized clinical trial with balanced allocation, conducted in the Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Medicine, in 2022. One hundred five CLBP patients who had no back pain-attributable structural or major diseases were randomly allocated into three parallel arms and received either physical therapy (PTG), acupuncture (APG), or venesection (VSG). Pain severity and functional aspects were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) during the study. VAS and ODI scores were defined as the primary outcomes. Results: Ninety-five patients were reviewed in the final analysis (PTG=33, APG=30, VSG=31). Demographic data showed equal group distribution. Statistical analysis showed all procedures had reduced VAS score immediately after the first session, after the last session, and after follow-up; however, APG and VSG values were significantly lower (P<0.05). Pain reduction results in follow-up period were more sustainable in APG and VSG as compared to PTG (P<0.01). ODI results revealed global improvement after the last session of the treatment in all groups, while APG had more significant results (P<0.05). During the follow-up period, ODI still tended to decrease in VSG, non-significantly increased in APG, and significantly increased in PTG. Only two patients reported fainting after receiving venesection. Conclusion: Considering the pain and functional scores, both acupuncture and venesection can reproduce reliable results. Acupuncture and venesection both have sustained effects on pain and daily function of the patients even after treatment termination, while physical therapy had more relapse in pain and functional limitations.

A Comparative Study of Endoscopic versus Percutaneous Epidural Neuroplasty in Lower Back Pain: Outcomes at Six-Month Follow Up.

Background and Objectives: Endoscopic epidural neuroplasty (EEN) facilitates adhesiolysis through direct epiduroscopic visualization, offering more precise neural decompression than that exhibited by percutaneous epidural neuroplasty (PEN). We aimed to compare the effects of EEN and PEN for 6 months after treatment with lower back and radicular pain in patients. Methods: This retrospective study compared the visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores in patients with low back and radicular pain who underwent EEN or PEN with a steering catheter. The medical records of 107 patients were analyzed, with 73 and 34 undergoing EEN and PEN, respectively. Results: The VAS and ODI scores decreased at all time points after EEN and PEN. VAS and ODI scores decreased more in the EEN group than those in the PEN group at 1 day and 1- and 6-months post-procedure, indicating superior pain relief for both lower back and radicular pain through EEN. Conclusions: EEN is a superior treatment of pain control than PEN in lower back and radicular pain patients.

Georg Schmorl Prize of the German Spine Society (DWG) 2023: the influence of sarcopenia and paraspinal muscle composition on patient-reported outcomes: a prospective investigation of lumbar spinal fusion patients with 12-month follow-up.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the impact of sarcopenia and lumbar paraspinal muscle composition (PMC) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after lumbar fusion surgery with 12-month follow-up (12 M-FU). METHODS: A prospective investigation of patients undergoing elective lumbar fusion was conducted. Preoperative MRI-based evaluation of the cross-sectional area (CSA), the functional CSA (fCSA), and the fat infiltration(FI) of the posterior paraspinal muscles (PPM) and the psoas muscle at level L3 was performed. Sarcopenia was defined by the psoas muscle index (PMI) at L3 (CSAPsoas [cm2]/(patients' height [m])2). PROs included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 12-item Short Form Healthy Survey with Physical (PCS-12) and Mental Component Scores (MCS-12) and Numerical Rating Scale back and leg (NRS-L) pain before surgery and 12 months postoperatively. Univariate and multivariable regression determined associations among sarcopenia, PMC and PROs. RESULTS: 135 patients (52.6% female, 62.1 years, BMI 29.1 kg/m2) were analyzed. The univariate analysis demonstrated that a higher FI (PPM) was associated with worse ODI outcomes at 12 M-FU in males. Sarcopenia (PMI) and higher FI (PPM) were associated with worse ODI and MCS-12 at 12 M-FU in females. Sarcopenia and higher FI of the PPM are associated with worse PCS-12 and more leg pain in females. In the multivariable analysis, a higher preoperative FI of the PPM (ß = 0.442; p = 0.012) and lower FI of the psoas (ß = -0.439; p = 0.029) were associated with a worse ODI at 12 M-FU after adjusting for covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative FI of the psoas and the PPM are associated with worse ODI outcomes one year after lumbar fusion. Sarcopenia is associated with worse ODI, PCS-12 and NRS-L in females, but not males. Considering sex differences, PMI and FI of the PPM might be used to counsel patients on their expectations for health-related quality of life after lumbar fusion.

Outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty in multiple myeloma: a tertiary neurosciences experience with long-term follow-up.

Background: Multiple myeloma is diagnosed in 5,800 people in the United Kingdom (UK) each year with up to 64% having vertebral compression fractures at the time of diagnosis. Painful vertebral compression fractures can be of significant detriment to patients' quality of life. Percutaneous vertebroplasty aims to provide long-term pain relief and stabilize fractured vertebrae. Methods and materials: Data was collected from all cases of percutaneous vertebroplasty performed on patients with multiple myeloma from November 2017 to January 2019. Pain scores were measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) pre-procedure, 2 months post procedure and 4 years post-procedure. Procedure related complications and analgesia use were also documented. Results: 22 patients were included with a total of 119 vertebrae treated. Patients reported a significant improvement in overall pain score with a median pre-procedure VAS of 8 and a median post-procedure VAS of 3.5 (p<0.0001). There was a median pre-procedure ODI score of 60% and a median post-procedure ODI score of 36% (p<0000.1). There was improvement across all ODI domains and a 77% reduction in analgesic requirement. There were small cement leaks into paravertebral veins or endplates at 15 levels (12%) which were asymptomatic. There were 8 responders to the long-term follow-up questionnaire at 4 years. This demonstrated an overall stable degree of pain relief in responders with a median VAS of 3.5 and median ODI of 30%. Conclusion: At this center, vertebroplasty has been shown to reduce both VAS and ODI pain scores and reduce analgesia requirements in patients with VCFs secondary to multiple myeloma with long lasting relief at 4 years post-procedure.

Reassessing the minimum 2-year follow-up standard after lumbar decompression surgery: a 2-month follow-up seems to be an acceptable minimum.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Academic orthopedic journals and specialty societies emphasize the importance of two-year follow-up for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) after spine surgery, but there are limited data evaluating the appropriate length of follow-up. PURPOSE: To determine whether PROMs, as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), would change significantly after 2-months postoperatively after lumbar decompression surgery for disc herniation or spinal stenosis. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively and consecutively enrolled patients undergoing lumbar decompression surgery between 2020 and 2021 from a single surgeon spine registry. PATIENT SAMPLE: One hundred sixty-nine patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: ODI, achievement of minimum clinically important difference (MCID), revisions. METHODS: Patients without a preoperative baseline score were excluded. Completion of the ODI questionnaire was assessed at the follow-up points. The median ODI was compared at time baseline, 2-month, 1-year and 2-year follow-up. Risk of reoperation was assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to identify at-risk ODI thresholds of requiring reoperation. RESULTS: Median ODI significantly improved at all time points compared to baseline (median baseline ODI: 40; 2-month ODI: 16, p=.001; 1-year ODI: 11.1, p=.001; 2-year ODI: 8, p=.001). Posthoc analysis demonstrated no difference between 2-months, 1-year and 2-year postoperative ODI (p=.9, p=.468, p=.606). The MCID was met in 87.9% of patients at 2 months, 80.7% at 1 year, and 87.3% at 2 years postoperatively. Twelve patients (7.7%) underwent revision surgery between 2 months and 2 years after the index surgery (median time to revision: 5.6 months). ROC curve analysis demonstrated that an ODI score ≥24 points at 2-months yielded a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 71.8% for predicting revision after lumbar decompression (AUC=0.758; 95% CI: 0.613-0.903). The Youden optimal threshold value of ≥24 points at 2-month postop ODI yielded an odd ratio (OR) for revision of 15.3 (CI: 1.8-131.8; p=.004). The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 15.4% and 98.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Two-year clinical follow-up may not be necessary for future peer-reviewed lumbar decompression surgery studies given that ODI plateaus at 8 weeks. Patients with a score ≥24 points at 2-months postoperatively have a higher risk of requiring a second surgery within the first 2 years and warrant continued follow-up.

Poor postoperative pain control is associated with poor long-term patient-reported outcomes after elective spine surgery: an observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: A significant proportion of patients experience poorly controlled surgical pain and fail to achieve satisfactory clinical improvement after spine surgery. However, a direct association between these variables has not been previously demonstrated. PURPOSE: To investigate the association between poor postoperative pain control and patient-reported outcomes after spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Ambispective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Consecutive adult patients (≥18-years old) undergoing inpatient elective cervical or thoracolumbar spine surgery. OUTCOME MEASURE: Poor surgical outcome was defined as failure to achieve a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 30% improvement on the Oswestry Disability Index or Neck Disability Index at follow-up (3-months, 1-year, and 2-years). METHODS: Poor pain control was defined as a mean numeric rating scale score of >4 during the first 24-hours after surgery. Multivariable mixed-effects regression was used to investigate the relationship between poor pain control and changes in surgical outcomes while adjusting for known confounders. Secondarily, the Calgary Postoperative Pain After Spine Surgery (CAPPS) Score was investigated for its ability to predict poor surgical outcome. RESULTS: Of 1294 patients, 47.8%, 37.3%, and 39.8% failed to achieve the MCID at 3-months, 1-year, and 2-years, respectively. The incidence of poor pain control was 56.9%. Multivariable analyses showed poor pain control after spine surgery was independently associated with failure to achieve the MCID (OR 2.35 [95% CI=1.59-3.46], p<.001) after adjusting for age (p=.18), female sex (p=.57), any nicotine products (p=.041), ASA physical status >2 (p<.001), ≥3 motion segment surgery (p=.008), revision surgery (p=.001), follow-up time (p<.001), and thoracolumbar surgery compared to cervical surgery (p=.004). The CAPPS score was also found to be independently predictive of poor surgical outcome. CONCLUSION: Poor pain control in the first 24-hours after elective spine surgery was an independent risk factor for poor surgical outcome. Perioperative treatment strategies to improve postoperative pain control may lead to improved patient-reported surgical outcomes.

Therapeutic Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Pain and Disability of Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome.

Purpose: This study intended to evaluate the effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) on Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS). FBSS refers to symptoms and disabilities which remain or occur after lumbar spinal surgery. Prevalent treatments for FBSS are based mostly on conservative management while LLLT has gained significant interest in the treatment of a wide variety of musculoskeletal disorders. Methods: In the present study, the authors included 50 individuals with FBSS. Target points were determined by an ultrasonic study including bilateral L2-L3 through L5-S1 facet joints, sacroiliac joints, and the region immediately above bilateral supra crestal iliac bones representing cluneal nerves. LLLT was performed three times a week for 3 weeks. A near-infrared laser (wavelength 808 nm, power 500 mw) was used in continuous mode for laser therapy sessions. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were registered before treatment and after last treatment session, 1 month and 6 months later, respectively. Results: NRS and ODI were significantly improved after treatment, as well as therapeutic effects, after 1 month and 6 months were also evident and comparison of the NRS and ODI showed significant difference. Conclusion: LLLT has a positive impact on pain and disability in patients with FBSS.

Sarcopenia and its effects on outcome of lumbar spine surgeries.

PURPOSE: Sarcopenia, defined as progressive impairment of muscle function secondary to loss of skeletal muscle mass, has prevalence of 24-56% in patients > 60 years. Forty-four per cent of elderly patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery are found to be sarcopenic. It is a known risk factor for fall, fractures, disability, increased post-operative morbidity and mortality. If diagnosed pre-operatively, it can help prepare the patient and surgical team to foresee complications and thereby reduce morbidity and mortality. In the present study, we evaluated and correlated sarcopenia with the surgical outcome of operated patients with lumbar spine pathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, observational study was conducted on 114 patients > 40 years undergoing lumbar spine surgeries, who were studied and followed up for 3 months. They were segregated into 5 groups based on age (40-50 year, 50-60 year, 60-70 year, 70-80 year, and > 80 year) and were assessed separately. Data on demography, grip strength analysis, 30-s chair stand test, Psoas muscle index (calculated on pre-operative MRI), pre- and post-operative ODI (Oswestry Disability Index) scores at 2 weeks and 3 months, Dindo-Clavien Classification of peri-operative complications, 90-day readmission rates and mortality (if any) were included. Patients were segregated into sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic groups based on the definition and set parameters as per the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP). A comparative analysis between these groups was performed. RESULTS: Of 114 patients, there were 18 patients in 40-49 years, 24 in 50-59 years, 33 in 60-69 years, 30 in 70-79 years and 9 in > 80 years age group. Statistically significant difference in peri-operative ODI scores was seen in sarcopenic vs non-sarcopenic patients in all age groups (p < 0.05) except 40-49 years. The results showed that sarcopenic group had higher rate of peri-operative complications, delayed mobilisation, longer stay and mortality compared to non-sarcopenic group. CONCLUSION: We conclude that sarcopenic patients have poor outcome in lumbar spine surgery compared to those without. So, by diagnosing sarcopenia using tests routinely done as pre-operative requirement, one can reduce radiation exposure and cost of treatment. The management can be revolutionised by predicting those who are at high risk of developing post-operative complications and poor surgical outcomes by mere diagnosis of sarcopenia. This knowledge will benefit both the patients and the surgeons.

Optimizing Physiotherapeutic Approaches in Parkinson's Disease Post-spinal Fixation Surgery: A Case Report.

Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) exhibit both a severe neuromuscular disorder and low bone quality at presentation. These issues are made worse by inactivity and a chairbound state. Each and every pathologic and degenerative process that affects the naturally aging spine also affects these individuals. Stooped posture is a symptom of a disease and can easily cause spinal degeneration. PD is associated with many physical abnormalities that cause a unique and specific need for rehabilitation. Patients' experiences highlight the challenges doctors face in diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation. This case report details the rehabilitation of a 67-year-old patient with PD who underwent spinal fixation for spinal stenosis and presented with complaints of weakness in both lower limbs. An advanced rehabilitation program was devised, primarily emphasizing strength training to enhance overall functionality. Pre- and post-intervention assessments were conducted, encompassing range of motion (ROM), manual muscle testing (MMT), Oswestry Disability Index, Functional Independence Measure, Lower Limb Functional Scale, and Berg Balance Scale, all of which demonstrated noteworthy improvements in joints ROM, strength, functional independence, balance, and lower limb function. This case report underscores the significance of rehabilitation programs in such cases, highlighting their important role in enhancing overall functioning.