Predictive modeling of medication adherence in post myocardial infarction patients: a bayesian approach using beta-regression.

AIMS: Predicting medication adherence in post myocardial infarction (MI) patients has the potential to improve patient outcomes. Most adherence prediction models dichotomize adherence metrics and status. This study aims to develop medication adherence prediction models that avoid dichotomizing adherence metrics and to test whether a simplified model including only 90-days adherence data would perform similarly to a full multivariable model. METHODS: Post MI adult patients were followed for 1-year post the event. Data from pharmacy records were used to calculate proportion of days covered (PDC). We used Bayesian beta-regression to model PDC as a proportion, avoiding dichotomization. For each medication group, statins, P2Y12 inhibitors and aspirin, two prediction models were developed, a full and a simplified model. RESULTS: 3692 patients were included for model development. The median (Inter quartile range) PDC at 1-year for statins, P2Y12 inhibitors and aspirin was 0.8 (0.33, 1.00), 0.79 (0.23, 0.99) and 0.79 (0.23, 0.99), respectively. All models showed good fit to the data by visual predictive checks. Bayesian R2 for statins, P2Y12 inhibitors and aspirin models were 61.4%,71.2% and 55.2%, respectively. The simplified models showed similar performance compared with full complex models as evaluated by cross validation. CONCLUSIONS: We developed Bayesian multilevel models for statins, P2Y12 inhibitors and aspirin in post MI patients that handled 1-year PDC as a proportion using the beta-distribution. In addition, simplified models, with 90-days adherence as single predictor, had similar performance compared with full complex models.

New interest in fibrinogen as an ischemic risk factor.

Platelet-fibrin clot formation is a key process in acute arterial thrombosis. The relationship between thrombin-induced platelet-fibrin clot strength (P-FCS) and fibrinogen levels in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and COVID-19 has not been studied. In thhe current study, the contribution of fibrinogen to P-FCS has been explored in healthy subjects (n=157), patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (n=116), and patients with CVD (n=93) using thrombelastography (TEG 6s) with citrate cartridge. We found that thrombin-induced P-FCS, fibrin clot strength (F-CS) and fibrinogen levels (FLEV) were higher among patients with CVD and COVID-19 compared to HS (p<0,05 for all) and highest among patients with COVID-19. P-FCS, an established risk factor for post-PCI ischemic event occurrences, was associated with both F-CS and FLEV (R2=0.67, p<0.001 for both comparisons. These data indicate that fibrinogen levels strongly influence the viscoelastic strength of the platelet-fibrin clot, fibrinogen may be an important driving factor for arterial thrombosis in the presence of potent platelet inhibition and may be as equally important a risk factor as high platelet reactivity. Since P-FCS is significantly associated with fibrinogen levels, the role of fibrinogen as a risk factor for arterial ischemic event occurrences should be further studied to improve antithrombotic therapy personalization.

Disparity in the Under-Utilization of Novel P2Y12 Inhibitors in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Background: The most recent guidelines (European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA)) all favor prasugrel/ticagrelor over clopidogrel in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We therefore sought to investigate which P2Y12 inhibitors were being prescribed in our community hospital setting upon discharge among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the setting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: We identified patients presenting to two Metro Detroit Michigan hospitals with STEMI between January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021 using the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) PCI registry. The primary outcome was the choice of P2Y12 inhibitor prescribed on day of discharge following hospitalization for STEMI, and baseline characteristics were compared including race, sex and type of insurance. Results: A total of 366 patients presented to these two Metro Detroit hospitals from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021. Female and non-White patients were more likely to be discharged on clopidogrel than ticagrelor or prasugrel (odds ratio (OR): 1.56, confidence interval (CI): 0.99 - 2.45, and OR: 1.43, CI: 0.91 - 2.25, respectively), however, did not reach statistical significance. Patients without private insurance presenting with STEMI were more likely to be discharged on clopidogrel (OR: 1.83, CI: 1.22 - 2.74), which did reach statistical significance in our cohort. Conclusions: In this retrospective single-center study evaluating BMC2 registry, we demonstrate a clinically significant disparity in prescribing patterns based on insurance, with trends for disparity based on gender and ethnicity.

Patient and Physician Perspectives on the Benefits and Risks of Antiplatelet Therapy for Acute Coronary Syndrome.

This article is co-authored by a patient with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who is receiving long-term antiplatelet therapy in the USA and a cardiologist who routinely treats patients with ACS. The patient describes his experience from diagnosis to the present day and discusses his concerns regarding treatment and management of the condition, including the balance between the benefits and risks of antiplatelet therapy. The patient also describes his work as an advocate for cardiac health. The physician perspective on treating and managing patients with ACS is provided by a cardiologist based in the USA who is and was not involved in this patient's care. The physician reviews the benefits and risks of antiplatelet therapies for the treatment of patients with ACS and discusses his own clinical experience of managing these patients, including how issues such as treatment adherence, as well as the potential inertia to prescribing certain medications that may be seen among physicians, could be overcome.

Antiplatelet therapies are commonly prescribed to patients who have experienced events termed "acute coronary syndrome" (ACS), such as a heart attack, to prevent further cardiovascular events. However, these medicines come with potential risks, such as bleeding. This article provides perspectives from a patient and a cardiologist on managing ACS, and the benefits and risks of antiplatelet therapies. Platelet inhibitors, which aim to prevent blood clots from forming, are the standard treatment for ACS. Different types of platelet inhibitors are used, including treatments known as P2Y12 inhibitors as well as treatments referred to as platelet aggregation inhibitors. Clinical trials have tested different combinations and durations of antiplatelet therapies, and some trials have shown that changing to P2Y12 inhibitor treatment alone after receiving a combination of platelet inhibitors can reduce the risk of cardiovascular events without increasing the risk of bleeding. Treatment guidelines recommend at least 12 months of platelet inhibitors for patients with ACS; however, treatment decisions should be individualized based on the patient's risk profile. Despite the evidence supporting their benefits, some physicians remain reluctant to prescribe potent P2Y12 inhibitors, preferring older, less potent options. Treatment adherence is also challenging, and is influenced by factors such as bleeding, education level, and cost. Improved education about the benefits and risks of antiplatelet therapies may help to address these issues and improve outcomes for patients with ACS. The perspectives of both the patient and the physician contribute to an increased understanding of ACS management and the challenges faced by patients and health care providers.

Low-dose aspirin for the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

During the past 30 years, several developments have occurred in the antiplatelet field, including the role of aspirin in primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. There have been several attempts to develop antiplatelet drugs more effective and safer than aspirin and a shift in emphasis from efficacy to safety, advocating aspirin-free antiplatelet regimens after percutaneous coronary intervention. Evidence supporting a chemopreventive effect of low-dose aspirin against colorectal (and other digestive tract) cancer has also strengthened. The aim of this article is to revisit the role of aspirin in the prevention of atherothrombosis across the cardiovascular risk continuum, in view of developments in the antiplatelet field. The review will offer a clinical perspective on aspirin's mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. This will be followed by a detailed discussion of its clinical efficacy and safety.

Impact of P2Y12 inhibitors on clinical outcomes in sepsis-3 patients receiving aspirin: a propensity score matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a life-threatening disease accompanied by disorders of the coagulation and immune systems. P2Y12 inhibitors, widely used for arterial thrombosis prevention and treatment, possess recently discovered anti-inflammatory properties, raising potential for improved sepsis prognosis. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the data from Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV database. Patients were divided into an aspirin-alone group versus a combination group based on the use of a P2Y12 inhibitor or not. Differences in 30-day mortality, length of stay (LOS) in intensive care unit (ICU), LOS in hospital, bleeding events and thrombotic events were compared between the two groups. RESULT: A total of 1701 pairs of matched patients were obtained by propensity score matching. We found that no statistically significant difference in 30-day mortality in aspirin-alone group and combination group (15.3% vs. 13.7%, log-rank p = 0.154). In addition, patients received P2Y12 inhibitors had a higher incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding (0.5% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.004) and ischemic stroke (1.7% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.023), despite having a shorter LOS in hospital (11.1 vs. 10.3, days, p = 0.043). Cox regression showed that P2Y12 inhibitor was not associated with 30-day mortality (HR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.95-1.36, p = 0.154). CONCLUSION: P2Y12 inhibitors did not provide a survival benefit for patients with sepsis 3 and even led to additional adverse clinical outcomes.

Impact of Society Guidelines on Trends in Use of Newer P2Y12 Inhibitors for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, major society guidelines have recommended the use of newer P2Y12 inhibitors over clopidogrel for those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome. It is unclear what impact these recommendations had on clinical practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: All percutaneous coronary intervention procedures (n=534 210) for acute coronary syndrome in England and Wales (April 1, 2010, to March 31, 2022) were retrospectively analyzed, stratified by choice of preprocedural P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel, ticagrelor, and prasugrel). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine odds ratios of receipt of ticagrelor and prasugrel (versus clopidogrel) over time, and predictors of their receipt. Overall, there was a significant increase in receipt of newer P2Y12 inhibitors from 2010 to 2020 (2022 versus 2010: ticagrelor odds ratio, 8.12 [95% CI, 7.67-8.60]; prasugrel odds ratio, 6.14 [95% CI, 5.53-6.81]), more so in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction than non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome indication. The most significant increase in odds of receipt of prasugrel was observed between 2020 and 2022 (P<0.001), following a decline/plateau in its use in earlier years (2011-2019). In contrast, the odds of receipt of ticagrelor significantly increased in earlier years (2012-2017, Ptrend<0.001), after which the trend was stable (Ptrend=0.093). CONCLUSIONS: Over a 13-year-period, there has been a significant increase in use of newer P2Y12 inhibitors, although uptake of prasugrel use remained significantly lower than ticagrelor. Earlier society guidelines (pre-2017) were associated with the highest rates of ticagrelor use for non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome and ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction cases while the ISAR-REACT 5 (Prospective, Randomized Trial of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome) trial and later society guidelines were associated with higher prasugrel use, mainly for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction indication.

Investigation of smoking on the antiplatelet response to clopidogrel: Unravelling the smoker's paradox.

The intricate relationship between smoking and the effects of the antiplatelet drug clopidogrel has been termed the "smoker's paradox". This paradox details the enhanced efficacy of clopidogrel in smokers compared to non-smokers. This review begins with an exploration of the proposed mechanisms of the smoker's paradox, particularly drawing attention to the induction of cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes via tobacco smoke, specifically the enzymes CYP1A2 and CYP2C19. Moreover, an investigation of the effects of genetic variability on the smoker's paradox was undertaken from both clinical and molecular perspectives, delving into the effects of ethnicity and genetic polymorphisms. The intriguing role of CYP1A2 genotypes and the response to clopidogrel in smoking and non-smoking populations was examined conferring insight into the individuality rather than universality of the smoker's paradox. CYP1A2 induction is hypothesised to elucidate the potency of smoking in exerting a counteracting effect in those taking clopidogrel who possess CYP2C19 loss of function polymorphisms. Furthermore, we assess the comparative efficacies of clopidogrel and other antiplatelet agents, namely prasugrel and ticagrelor. Studies indicated that prasugrel and ticagrelor provided a more consistent effect and further reduced platelet reactivity compared to clopidogrel within both smoking and non-smoking populations. Personalised dosing was another focus of the review considering patient comorbidities, genetic makeup, and smoking status with the objective of improving the antiplatelet response of those taking clopidogrel. In summation, this review provides insight into multiple areas of research concerning clopidogrel and the smoker's paradox taking into account proposed mechanisms, genetics, other antiplatelet agents, and personalised dosing.

Association of Age- and Body Mass Index-Stratified High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity With Coronary Intervention Outcomes in East Asian Patients.

BACKGROUND: Although age and body mass index (BMI) significantly affect platelet reactivity units and clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention, there are limited data on the relationship between high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) and clinical outcomes on age and BMI differences. Thus, we investigated the association of HPR with clinical outcomes according to age and BMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study analyzed 11 714 patients who underwent platelet function tests after percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary end point was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), whereas the secondary end point was major bleeding. HPR was defined as platelet reactivity units ≥252. Patients were categorized by age (<67 years of age or ≥67 years of age) and BMI (≤22.6 kg/m2 or >22.6 kg/m2). Patients <67 years of age with HPR had increases in both MACCEs (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.436 [95% CI, 1.106-1.867]; P=0.007) and major bleeding (adjusted HR, 1.584 [95% CI, 1.095-2.290]; P=0.015) compared with the those with non-HPR, respectively. In patients ≥67 years of age with HPR, there were no differences in MACCEs, but there was a decrease in major bleeding (adjusted HR, 0.721 [95% CI, 0.542-0.959]; P=0.024). Meanwhile, patients with HPR with BMI >22.6 kg/m2 had increases in MACCEs (adjusted HR, 1.387 [95% CI, 1.140-1.688]; P=0.001). No differences were shown in major bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: HPR was linked to an increase in MACCEs or a decrease in major bleeding in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention, depending on age and BMI. This study is the first to observe that clinical outcomes in patients with HPR after percutaneous coronary intervention may vary based on age and BMI. Because the study is observational, the results should be viewed as hypothesis generating and emphasize the need for randomized clinical trials.

Antiplatelet Therapy for Patients Who Have Undergone Revascularization Within the Past Year: Which Agents and for How Long?

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor is recommended for at least 6 and 12 months following percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents among patients with stable ischemic heart disease and acute coronary syndrome, respectively. Additional exposure to antiplatelet therapy reduces ischemic events but also increases bleeding risk. Conversely, shorter durations of DAPT are preferred among those at high bleeding risk. Hence, decisions surrounding duration of DAPT after revascularization should include clinical judgment, assessment of the risk of bleeding and ischemic events, and time after revascularization.

Navigating P2Y12 inhibition in the labyrinth of cardio-oncology care: cangrelor bridging in patients with cancer.

Cangrelor, a potent intravenous P2Y12 platelet inhibitor, has demonstrated effectiveness in reducing ischemic events without a corresponding increase in severe bleeding during percutaneous coronary intervention, as evidenced by the CHAMPION-PHOENIX trial. Its off-label role as a bridging antiplatelet agent for patients facing high thrombotic risks who must temporarily stop oral P2Y12 inhibitor therapy further underscores its clinical utility. This is the first case series to shed light on the application of cangrelor in cancer patients needing to pause dual antiplatelet therapy for a range of medical interventions, marking it as a pioneering effort in this domain. The inclusion of patients with a variety of cancer types and cardiovascular conditions in this series underlines the adaptability and critical role of cangrelor in managing the dual challenges of bleeding risk and the need for uninterrupted antiplatelet protection. By offering a bridge for high-risk cancer patients who have recently undergone percutaneous coronary intervention and need to halt oral P2Y12 inhibitors temporarily, cangrelor presents a practical solution. Early findings indicate it can be discontinued safely 2-4 h before medical procedures, allowing for the effective reintroduction of oral P2Y12 inhibitors without adverse effects. This evidence calls for expanded research to validate and extend these preliminary observations, emphasizing the importance of further investigation into cangrelor's applications in complex patient care scenarios.

Low-dose prasugrel versus standard-dose ticagrelor in east Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Low-dose prasugrel demonstrated a similar effectiveness profile to clopidogrel in East Asian ACS patients, but its comparison with another new-generation potent P2Y12 inhibitor, ticagrelor, remains unclear. To compare the effectiveness and safety of low-dose prasugrel against those of standard-dose ticagrelor in East Asian patients with ACS. This retrospective cohort study used Taiwan's National Health and Welfare Database. This study included ACS patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and, at discharge between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020, were prescribed with low-dose prasugrel plus aspirin or standard-dose ticagrelor plus aspirin. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance the covariates across these two groups. The primary effectiveness outcome was a composite of acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and cardiovascular death; the secondary effectiveness outcome was each of the individual components of the primary outcome, transient ischemic attack, and repeat revascularization. The primary safety outcome was a composite of intracranial hemorrhage and gastrointestinal bleeding, and the two secondary safety outcomes were intracranial hemorrhage and gastrointestinal bleeding. A total of 24,807 patients were included in this study. Among them, 1,493 were low-dose prasugrel users and 23,314 were standard-dose ticagrelor users. No significant differences were found in primary effectiveness [HR: 0.97 (0.74-1.28)] or primary safety outcomes [HR: 1.22 (0.73-2.01)] between the two study groups. For East Asian patients with ACS, low-dose prasugrel provides comparable effectiveness without increasing bleeding risk compared to standard-dose ticagrelor. Low-dose prasugrel may be an appropriate alternative for East Asian populations.

Pretreatment With P2Y12 Inhibitors in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the Bern-PCI Registry.

BACKGROUND: Evidence to support immediate P2Y12 inhibitor loading in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is limited. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare outcomes of STEMI patients receiving immediate or delayed P2Y12 inhibitor treatment. METHODS: Using data from the prospective Bern-PCI registry between 2016 and 2020, we stratified STEMI patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention according to time periods with different institutional recommendations regarding P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment. In cohort 1 (October 2016-September 2018), immediate P2Y12 inhibitor treatment was recommended. In cohort 2 (October 2018-September 2020), P2Y12 inhibitor treatment was recommended after coronary anatomy was confirmed. The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, or definite stent thrombosis at 30 days. Sensitivity analysis included only patients in whom these recommendations were followed. RESULTS: Cohort 1 included 1,116 patients; pretreatment was actually given in 708 (63.4%). Cohort 2 included 847 patients; pretreatment was withheld in 798 (94.2%). The mean age was 65 ± 13 years, and 24% were female. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between groups. The median difference for P2Y12 loading to angiography was 52 minutes between cohort 1 and 2 and 100 minutes between patients receiving vs not receiving pretreatment. Rates of MACCEs were similar between cohort 1 and cohort 2 (10.1% vs 8.1%; adjusted HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.65-1.28; P = 0.59) and between patients receiving vs not receiving pretreatment (7.1% vs 8.4%; adjusted HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.78-1.74; P = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort study of patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment was not associated with improved MACCEs.

Comparison of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome at High Bleeding or Ischemic Risk.

Current guidelines recommend individualizing the choice and duration of P2Y12 inhibitor therapy based on the trade-off between bleeding and ischemic risk. However, whether a potent P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor) or a less potent one (clopidogrel) is more appropriate in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the setting of high bleeding or ischemic risk is not clear. The study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in patients with ACS at high bleeding or ischemic risk. A total of 5,713 patients with ACS were included in this retrospective study. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was adjusted by applying the inverse probability weighted approach to reduce treatment selection bias. The primary clinical outcome was all-cause death. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital death, ACS, target vessel revascularization, stent thrombosis, stroke, or clinically significant or major bleeding. The median follow-up duration was 53.6 months. After multivariable Cox model using an inverse probability weighted approach, all-cause death in the overall population and subgroups of patients at high bleeding risk, and/or at high ischemic risk were not significantly different between clopidogrel and ticagrelor. Rates for secondary outcomes were also similar between the groups. In conclusion, ticagrelor and clopidogrel are associated with comparable clinical outcomes in patients with ACS irrespective of bleeding and ischemic risk.

Do We Still Need Aspirin in Coronary Artery Disease?

Aspirin has for some time been used as a first-line treatment for acute coronary syndromes, including ST-elevation myocardial infarction, for secondary prevention of established coronary disease, and for primary prevention in patients at risk of coronary artery disease. Although aspirin has been in use for decades, the available evidence for its efficacy largely predates the introduction of other drugs, such as statins and P2Y12 inhibitors. Based on recent trials, the recommendation for aspirin use as primary prevention has been downgraded. In addition, P2Y12 inhibitors given as a single antiplatelet therapy have been associated with a lower incidence of bleeding than dual antiplatelet therapy in combination with aspirin in patients with stable and unstable coronary artery disease. The aim of this review is to discuss the role of aspirin considering the available evidence for primary prevention, secondary prevention for stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes, and after percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass revascularization.

Evaluating the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic impact of different modes of ticagrelor administration.

INTRODUCTION: Alternative administration modes for oral P2Y12 inhibitors, particularly ticagrelor, have emerged as a potential alternative to overcome the limitations associated with the delayed onset of action of these drugs in patients who are unable to swallow or with impaired absorption. AREAS COVERED: This comprehensive literature review aims to provide an overview of the current state of knowledge on the pharmacokinetics and administration modes of ticagrelor, including factors that may affect its action. It also compares the pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor with that of other drugs with similar uses to provide a comprehensive understanding of the potential advantages and limitations of different modalities of P2Y12 administration. For this purpose, Embase, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from database inception to July 2023. EXPERT OPINION: Among the different alternatives, crushed formulations, especially for ticagrelor, have emerged as the most promising option, showing early and robust platelet inhibition. However, important questions remain unanswered, such as the comparative clinical benefits of crushed ticagrelor versus standard administration, the cost-effectiveness of alternative modes compared to intravenous P2Y12 inhibitors such as cangrelor, and the important limitations associated with the concomitant use of opioids, who have been proven to impair even the action of crushed ticagrelor.