Approaches to Deprescribing Proton Pump Inhibitors in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review.

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are some of the most frequently prescribed medications, but they are often used inappropriately, either being prescribed without a clear indication or continued for longer than necessary. In such cases, deprescribing is recommended. However, despite its proven effectiveness, the implementation of deprescribing in clinical practice remains inconsistent and varied, making it challenging to identify the most effective strategies. The goal is to provide a comprehensive outline of deprescribing interventions for PPI therapy implemented across various settings and by different healthcare professionals. Methods: The study is designed to be a systematic review of the published literature. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched from 1 January 1989 (the first PPI on the market) to 30 September 2024 for articles assessing PPI deprescribing in adult patients, focusing on the implementation rate (primary outcome) or effects on symptoms (secondary outcome). Results: After screening, 66 studies were included, predominantly pragmatic trials (N = 32) or randomized controlled trials (N = 25). We found a variety of interventions promoting PPI deprescription. Collaborative efforts involving multiple healthcare professionals, the use of algorithms for clinical decision-making, and patient involvement have proven to be key elements in the most effective strategies. Discontinuing therapy may not be advisable in cases of recurrent symptoms, suggesting that on-demand therapy could be a recommended approach. Deprescribing is particularly relevant for individuals with mild illnesses and symptoms, where tapering can effectively mitigate the rebound symptoms often associated with abrupt discontinuation. Conclusions: Given the current prevalence of inappropriate PPI prescribing, it is imperative to raise awareness among both physicians and patients about the importance of the deprescribing process, which should be tailored to the specific needs of each patient, considering his/her medical history, current health status, and personal preferences.

Clinical drug interactions between voriconazole and 38 other drugs: a retrospective analysis of adverse events.

Background: Voriconazole (VRZ) is involved in a variety of drug‒drug interactions (DDIs), but few studies have reported adverse events (AEs) associated with the DDIs of VRZ. The primary goal of this study was to analyse the potential risk factors for AEs caused by DDIs between VRZ and other drugs via the OpenVigil FDA platform and to provide a reference for preventing VRZ DDIs and monitoring clinically related adverse drug events. Methods: A retrospective pharmacovigilance study was conducted to investigate the AEs related to DDIs between VRZ and four categories of drugs: proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), immunosuppressants, and other antibacterial drugs. AE information for the target drugs from the first quarter of 2004 to the third quarter of 2022 was downloaded from the OpenVigil FDA data platform. Four frequency statistical models-the reporting ratio method, Ω shrinkage measure model, combination risk ratio model, and the chi-square statistics model-were used to analyse the AEs related to DDIs and evaluate the correlation and influence of sex and age between the drug(s) and the target AEs detected. Results: A total of 38 drugs were included, with 262 AEs detected by at least one of the four models and 48 AEs detected by all four models. Some 77 detected AEs were significantly positively correlated with DDIs and were related to higher reporting rates of AEs than when used alone. Graft-versus-host disease was the AE that had the strongest correlation with the drug interaction between VRZ and immunosuppressants (tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, and cyclosporine), and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome was correlated with VRZ in combination with other antibacterial drugs (linezolid, meropenem, cefepime, and vancomycin). Significant sex and age differences in the target AEs were detected for five and nine target drugs, respectively. For VRZ in combination with linezolid, aggravated conditions and respiratory failure should be given more attention in male patients, and mycophenolate mofetil and respiratory failure in female patients. When conditions are aggravated, febrile neutropenia and septic shock should be of particular concern in patients over 18 years of age who use VRZ in combination with ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, or cytarabine. In patients aged under 18, septic shock should be considered when VRZ is used in combination with meropenem and dexamethasone. Conclusion: AEs related to DDIs should receive more attention when VRZ is used in combination with PPIs (renal impairment), NSAIDs (constipation and renal failure), immunosuppressants (graft versus host disease, septic shock) and other antibacterial drugs (multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, febrile neutropenia, and respiratory failure). Considering the influence of sex and age differences in VRZ DDIs, these factors need to be considered when assessing the risk of AEs in patients receiving VRZ and other drugs.

Salivary microbiota composition before and after use of proton pump inhibitors in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux: a self-control study.

BACKGROUND: Issues associated with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) usage have been documented. PPIs affect the gastrointestinal microbiome, as well as the saliva microbiota of healthy individuals. However, the alterations in the saliva microbiota of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) patients remain unclear. This study aims to examine the composition of saliva microbiota in LPR patients before and after PPI usage through a self-controlled study. METHODS: Thirty-two adult LPR patients participated in the study. Saliva samples were collected before and after an 8-week regimen of twice-daily administration of 20-mg esomeprazole. The impact of PPI administration on bacterial communities was assessed using 16 S rRNA gene sequencing. The functional and metabolic changes in saliva microbial communities after PPI usage were analyzed using PICRUSt2 based on our 16 S rRNA gene sequencing results. RESULTS: The alpha diversity within the salivary microbiota, as measured by the PD-whole-tree index, exhibited a significant difference between samples collected before and after PPI application (P = 0.038). Additionally, PCoA analysis of unweighted UniFrac distances (beta diversity) revealed distinct separation of saliva sample microbiota structures before and after PPI application in LPR patients, with statistical significance (Adonis test, R2 = 0.063, P< 0.010). Taxon-based analysis indicated that PPI administration increased the abundance of Epsilonproteobacteria, Campylobacterales, Campylobacteraceae, Campylobacter, and Campylobacter_gracilis, while reducing the abundance of Lactobacillaceae and Lactobacillus in salivary samples ( P< 0.050). Using LEfSe to compare bacterial abundances, Bacillaceae and Anoxybacillus were found to be enriched before PPI usage in LPR patients. Furthermore, the proportion of genes responsible for indole alkaloid biosynthesis in the salivary microbiota of LPR patients significantly increased after PPI therapy (P< 0.050). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that PPIs induce alterations in the salivary microbiota of LPR patients. CHINESE CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: No. ChiCTR2300067507. Registered on January 10,2023 retrospectively.

Pharmacological management of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: state of the art in 2024.

INTRODUCTION: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic disease of the esophagus characterized by the regurgitation of stomach contents into the esophagus, causing troublesome symptoms and/or complications. Among patients with GERD, around 30% of patients have visible mucosal damage, while 70% have normal esophageal mucosa. Accordingly, the optimal pharmacological treatment of GERD should address different disease manifestations, including symptoms, the mucosal damage when present, and possible chronic complications, including strictures, Barrett's esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma. AREAS COVERED: Available medical treatments for GERD include proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs), histamine receptor antagonists (H2-RAs), prokinetics, and mucosal protectants, such as alginates, hyaluronic acid/chondroitin-sulfate, and poliprotect. Each compound has its own advantages and disadvantages, and knowledge of expected benefits and tips for their use is paramount for the success of treatment. In addition, the appropriateness of indications for initiating treatment is also crucial to achieve positive results when managing GERD patients. EXPERT OPINION: PPIs, PCABs, H2-RAs, prokinetics, and mucosal protectants can all be used in patients with GERD, but careful assessment of patients' characteristics as well as advantages and disadvantages of each therapeutic compound is essential to ensure successful treatment of GERD.

Impairing protein-protein interactions in an essential tRNA modification complex: An innovative antimicrobial strategy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) have been recognized as a promising target for the development of new drugs, as proved by the growing number of PPI modulators reaching clinical trials. In this context, peptides represent a valid alternative to small molecules, owing to their unique ability to mimic the target protein structure and interact with wider surface areas. Among the possible fields of interest, bacterial PPIs represent an attractive target to face the urgent necessity to fight antibiotic resistance. Growing attention has been paid to the YgjD/YeaZ/YjeE complex responsible for the essential t6A37 tRNA modification in bacteria. We previously identified an α-helix on the surface of Pseudomonas aeruginosa YeaZ, crucial for the YeaZ-YeaZ homodimer formation and the conserved YeaZ-YgjD interactions. Herein, we present our studies for impairing the PPIs involved in the formation of the YeaZ dimers through synthetic peptide derivatives of this helical moiety, both in vitro with purified components and on P. aeruginosa cells. Our results proved the possibility of targeting those PPIs which are usually essential for protein functioning and thus are refractory to mutational changes and antibiotic resistance development.

Homologous mapping yielded a comprehensive predicted protein-protein interaction network for peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.).

BACKGROUND: Protein-protein interactions are the primary means through which proteins carry out their functions. These interactions thus have crucial roles in life activities. The wide availability of fully sequenced animal and plant genomes has facilitated establishment of relatively complete global protein interaction networks for some model species. The genomes of cultivated and wild peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) have also been sequenced, but the functions of most of the encoded proteins remain unclear. RESULTS: We here used homologous mapping of validated protein interaction data from model species to generate complete peanut protein interaction networks for A. hypogaea cv. 'Tifrunner' (282,619 pairs), A. hypogaea cv. 'Shitouqi' (256,441 pairs), A. monticola (440,470 pairs), A. duranensis (136,363 pairs), and A. ipaensis (172,813 pairs). A detailed analysis was conducted for a putative disease-resistance subnetwork in the Tifrunner network to identify candidate genes and validate functional interactions. The network suggested that DX2UEH and its interacting partners may participate in peanut resistance to bacterial wilt; this was preliminarily validated with overexpression experiments in peanut. CONCLUSION: Our results provide valuable new information for future analyses of gene and protein functions and regulatory networks in peanut.

Quantitative Characterization of the Impact of Protein-Protein Interactions on Ligand-Protein Binding: A Multi-Chain Dynamics Perturbation Analysis Method.

Many protein-protein interactions (PPIs) affect the ways in which small molecules bind to their constituent proteins, which can impact drug efficacy and regulatory mechanisms. While recent advances have improved our ability to independently predict both PPIs and ligand-protein interactions (LPIs), a comprehensive understanding of how PPIs affect LPIs is still lacking. Here, we examined 63 pairs of ligand-protein complexes in a benchmark dataset for protein-protein docking studies and quantified six typical effects of PPIs on LPIs. A multi-chain dynamics perturbation analysis method, called mcDPA, was developed to model these effects and used to predict small-molecule binding regions in protein-protein complexes. Our results illustrated that the mcDPA can capture the impact of PPI on LPI to varying degrees, with six similar changes in its predicted ligand-binding region. The calculations showed that 52% of the examined complexes had prediction accuracy at or above 50%, and 55% of the predictions had a recall of not less than 50%. When applied to 33 FDA-approved protein-protein-complex-targeting drugs, these numbers improved to 60% and 57% for the same accuracy and recall rates, respectively. The method developed in this study may help to design drug-target interactions in complex environments, such as in the case of protein-protein interactions.

NSAID-induced Gastric Ulcer Disease: A Deleterious Connection.

Gastric ulcers induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) usage have become a common public health problem, and several studies have established chronic NSAID usage to be one of the risk factors for the pathogenesis of peptic ulcers in patients. This review includes numerous articles that link NSAID usage with peptic mucosal erosion, especially among patients under anticoagulant therapy or with other risk factors. Risk factors for NSAID-induced peptic ulcers are reviewed, in addition to pathogenesis, clinical signs, symptoms, diagnosis, prevention, and treatments. We also emphasize effective methods for the prevention and management of peptic ulcers among NSAID users. Such methods include the use of selective Cyclo-oxygenase (COX-2) inhibitors as an alternative to aspirin or other Cyclo-oxygenase (COX-1) inhibitors, or using the lowest dosage possible in patients with other comorbidities. We have conducted a thorough review of the literature on diagnostic tests and alternative medication that can be used in the management of NSAID toxicity-induced ulcers.

A Comprehensive Review on the Efficacy and Safety of Vonoprazan in the Management of Gastric Acid-Related Diseases.

Gastric acid-related diseases, including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), peptic ulcer disease (PUD), and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, present significant clinical challenges due to their prevalence and potential for severe complications. Effective management of these conditions is essential for symptom relief, mucosal healing, and prevention of complications. This review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), in the treatment of gastric acid-related diseases and to compare it with traditional proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). A comprehensive analysis of clinical trials and studies was conducted to assess the effectiveness of vonoprazan in managing GERD, PUD, and H. pylori infection. The safety profile of vonoprazan was also reviewed, and comparisons were made to PPIs and other gastric acid suppressants. Vonoprazan demonstrates superior and more consistent acid suppression than PPIs, resulting in rapid and sustained symptom relief and mucosal healing. Clinical trials have shown its efficacy in treating GERD, PUD, and H. pylori infection, with higher eradication rates for H. pylori when used in combination therapies. The safety profile of vonoprazan is favorable, with fewer adverse effects and drug interactions compared to PPIs. Vonoprazan offers a promising alternative to traditional PPIs for the management of gastric acid-related diseases. Its unique mechanism of action and superior efficacy make it a valuable option for patients requiring effective and reliable acid suppression. Further research is warranted to explore its potential in broader clinical applications and to establish long-term safety data.

Potassium-competitive Acid Blockers: Current Clinical Use and Future Developments.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) represents the standard of care in the treatment of acid-related diseases. However, despite their effectiveness, PPIs display some intrinsic limitations, which underlie the unmet clinical needs that have been identified over the past decades. The aims of this review are to summarize the current status and future development of the new class of antisecretory drugs (potassium-competitive acid blockers, P-CABs) that have recently been introduced into medical practice. RECENT FINDINGS: Over the past decades, clinical needs unmet by the current acid suppressants have been recognized, especially in the management of patients with GERD, Helicobacter pylori infection and NSAID-related peptic ulcer. The failure to address these needs is mainly due to their inability to achieve a consistent acid suppression in all patients and, particularly, to control nighttime acidity. It was then realized that an extended duration of acid suppression would exert additional benefits. The available data with P-CABs show that they are able to address these unmet clinical needs. Four different P-CABs (vonoprazan, tegoprazan, fexuprazan and keverprazan) are currently available. However, only two of them are approved outside Asia. Vonoprazan is available in North, Central and South America while tegoprazan is marketed only in Latin American countries. Two other compounds (namely linazapran glurate and zestaprazan) are presently under clinical development. While clinical trials on GERD have been performed with all P-CABs, only vonoprazan and tegoprazan have been investigated as components of Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens. The available data show that-in the above two clinical indications-P-CABs provide similar or better efficacy in comparison with PPIs. Their safety in the short-term overlaps that of PPIs, but data from long-term treatment are needed.

Safety of potassium-competitive acid blockers in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

INTRODUCTION: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the first-line treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, due to their intrinsic limitations, there are still unmet clinical needs that have fostered the development of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs). Currently, four different drugs (vonoprazan, tegoprazan, fexuprazan, and keverprazan) are marketed in some Asian countries, whereas only vonoprazan and tegoprazan are available in Western countries (USA and Brazil or Mexico, respectively). AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes the current knowledge on P-CABs acute and long-term safety in GERD treatment compared to that of PPIs. Full-text articles and abstracts were searched in PubMed. EXPERT OPINION: P-CABs proved to address some of the unmet clinical needs in GERD, with a favorable risk-benefit ratio compared to conventional PPIs. Preclinical and clinical findings have highlighted P-CAB safety to be superimposable, to that of PPIs, in short-term treatments, although further studies are warranted to monitor their effects in long-term therapy. From an epidemiological point of view, the paucity of rigorous data for many variables (e.g. age, ethnicity, drug interactions, comorbidities, genetic polymorphisms, interindividual susceptibility, and gut dysbiosis) deserves a worldwide framework of continuous pre/post-marketing pharmacovigilance programs to reduce potential confounding factors and accurately link acute and chronic P-CAB therapy to adverse outcomes.

A network meta-analysis: evaluating the efficacy and safety of concurrent proton pump inhibitors and clopidogrel therapy in post-PCI patients.

Introduction: The objective of this research was to evaluate the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) associated with the use of various proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in combination with clopidogrel in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: To accomplish this, we analyzed data from randomized controlled trials and retrospective cohort studies sourced from key electronic databases. These studies specifically examined the effects of different PPIs, such as lansoprazole, esomeprazole, omeprazole, rabeprazole, and pantoprazole, when used in conjunction with clopidogrel on MACEs. The primary focus was on the differential impact of these PPIs, while the secondary focus was on the comparison of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding events in groups receiving different PPIs with clopidogrel vs. a placebo group. This study's protocol was officially registered with INPLASY (INPLASY2024-2-0009). Results: We conducted a network meta-analysis involving 16 studies with a total of 145,999 patients. Our findings indicated that rabeprazole when combined with clopidogrel, had the lowest increase in MACE risk (effect size, 1.05, 95% CI: 0.66-1.66), while lansoprazole was associated with the highest risk increase (effect size, 1.48, 95% CI: 1.22-1.80). Esomeprazole (effect size, 1.28, 95% CI: 1.09-1.51), omeprazole (effect size, 1.23, 95% CI: 1.07-1.43), and pantoprazole (effect size, 1.38, 95% CI: 1.18-1.60) also significantly increased MACE risk. For the secondary outcome, esomeprazole (effect size, 0.30, 95% CI: 0.09-0.94), omeprazole (effect size, 0.34, 95% CI: 0.14-0.81), and pantoprazole (effect size, 0.33, 95% CI: 0.13-0.84) demonstrated an increased potential for GI bleeding prevention. Conclusions: In conclusion, the combination of lansoprazole and clopidogrel was found to significantly elevate the risk of MACEs without offering GI protection in post-PCI patients. This study is the first network meta-analysis to identify the most effective regimen for the concurrent use of clopidogrel with individual PPIs. Systematic Review Registration: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2024-2-0009/, identifier (INPLASY2024-2-0009).

Proton Pump Inhibitors Versus Histamine-2 Receptor Blockers for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis on In-hospital Mortality Among Intensive Care Unit Patients Hospitalized for Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events: Retrospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) commonly receive stress ulcer prophylaxis drugs, either proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or histamine-2 receptor blockers (H2RBs). The goal of this research was to evaluate the impact of these drugs on mortality among ICU patients hospitalized for major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). METHODS: ICU patients hospitalized for MACCEs were sourced from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III database. We performed a propensity score matching analysis to match patients treated with PPIs to those treated with H2RBs for stress ulcer prophylaxis. The outcome was 90-day mortality. We used multivariable Cox regression analyses to compare the effect. Hazard ratio (HR), 95% CIs, and P values were reported from the model. FINDINGS: From 2001 to 2012, a total of 3577 patients hospitalized for MACCEs (1997 received PPIs and 1580 received H2RBs) were admitted. The 90-day mortality was 23.7% (848/3577); it was 27% (540/1997) and 19.5% (308/1580) for PPIs and H2RBs users, respectively. The PPI group exhibited a greater 90­day mortality in comparison to the H2RBs group (relative risk = 1.17; P = 0.036), after conditioning on potential confounder. The results remained robust in propensity score matching, sensitivity analyses, and subgroup analyses. IMPLICATIONS: PPIs for stress ulcer prophylaxis were linked to an increased risk of in-hospital mortality than H2RBs in patients hospitalized for MACCEs. Further investigation of this association and validation of its clinical significance is needed.

Pantoprazole and riluzole target H+/K+-ATPases and pH-sensitive K+ channels in pancreatic cancer cells.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains the most lethal cancer type. PDAC is characterized by fibrotic, hypoxic, and presumably acidic tumor microenvironment (TME). Acidic TME is an important player in tumor development, progression, aggressiveness, and chemoresistance. The dysregulation of ductal ion transporters/channels might contribute to extracellular pH (pHe) acidification and PDAC progression. Our aim was to test whether H+/K+-ATPases and pH-sensitive K+ channels contribute to these processes and could be targeted by clinically approved drugs. We used human pancreatic cancer cells adapted to various pHe conditions and grown in monolayers and spheroids. First, we created cells expressing pHoran4 at the outer plasma membrane and showed that pantoprazole, the H+/K+-ATPase inhibitor, alkalinized pHe. Second, we used FluoVolt to monitor the membrane voltage (Vm) and showed that riluzole hyperpolarized Vm, most likely by opening of pH-sensitive K+ channels such as TREK-1. Third, we show that pantoprazole and riluzole inhibited cell proliferation and viability of monolayers and spheroids of cancer cells adapted to various pHe conditions. Most importantly, combination of the two drugs had significantly larger inhibitory effects on PDAC cell survival. We propose that co-targeting H+/K+-ATPases and pH-sensitive K+ channels by re-purposing of pantoprazole and riluzole could provide novel acidosis-targeted therapies of PDAC.

Comprehensive Review on Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation and Its Application in Deciphering Protein-Protein Interactions in Cell Signaling Pathways.

Signaling pathways are responsible for transmitting information between cells and regulating cell growth, differentiation, and death. Proteins in cells form complexes by interacting with each other through specific structural domains, playing a crucial role in various biological functions and cell signaling pathways. Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) within cell signaling pathways are essential for signal transmission and regulation. The spatiotemporal features of PPIs in signaling pathways are crucial for comprehending the regulatory mechanisms of signal transduction. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) is one kind of imaging tool for the direct visualization of PPIs in living cells and has been widely utilized to uncover novel PPIs in various organisms. BiFC demonstrates significant potential for application in various areas of biological research, drug development, disease diagnosis and treatment, and other related fields. This review systematically summarizes and analyzes the technical advancement of BiFC and its utilization in elucidating PPIs within established cell signaling pathways, including TOR, PI3K/Akt, Wnt/ß-catenin, NF-κB, and MAPK. Additionally, it explores the application of this technology in revealing PPIs within the plant hormone signaling pathways of ethylene, auxin, Gibberellin, and abscisic acid. Using BiFC in conjunction with CRISPR-Cas9, live-cell imaging, and ultra-high-resolution microscopy will enhance our comprehension of PPIs in cell signaling pathways.

Structural basis of the Integrator complex assembly and association with transcription factors.

Integrator is a multi-subunit protein complex responsible for premature transcription termination of coding and non-coding RNAs. This is achieved via two enzymatic activities, RNA endonuclease and protein phosphatase, acting on the promoter-proximally paused RNA polymerase Ⅱ (RNAPⅡ). Yet, it remains unclear how Integrator assembly and recruitment are regulated and what the functions of many of its core subunits are. Here, we report the structures of two human Integrator sub-complexes: INTS10/13/14/15 and INTS5/8/10/15, and an integrative model of the fully assembled Integrator bound to the RNAPⅡ paused elongating complex (PEC). An in silico protein-protein interaction screen of over 1,500 human transcription factors (TFs) identified ZNF655 as a direct interacting partner of INTS13 within the fully assembled Integrator. We propose a model wherein INTS13 acts as a platform for the recruitment of TFs that could modulate the stability of the Integrator's association at specific loci and regulate transcription attenuation of the target genes.

Chemical cross-linking and mass spectrometry enabled systems-level structural biology.

Structural information on protein-protein interactions (PPIs) is essential for improved understanding of regulatory interactome networks that confer various physiological and pathological responses. Additionally, maladaptive PPIs constitute desirable therapeutic targets due to inherently high disease state specificity. Recent advances in chemical cross-linking strategies coupled with mass spectrometry (XL-MS) have positioned XL-MS as a promising technology to not only elucidate the molecular architecture of individual protein assemblies, but also to characterize proteome-wide PPI networks. Moreover, quantitative in vivo XL-MS provides a new capability for the visualization of cellular interactome dynamics elicited by drug treatments, disease states, or aging effects. The emerging field of XL-MS based complexomics enables unique insights on protein moonlighting and protein complex remodeling. These techniques provide complimentary information necessary for in-depth structural interactome studies to better comprehend how PPIs mediate function in living systems.

Vonoprazan a novel potassium competitive acid blocker; another leap forward.

Introduction: The eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) has decreased due to antibiotics resistance and inadequate acid suppression. Vonoprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), which has a rapid and sustained acid inhibitory effect and may be more effective than conventional proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in H. pylori eradication. Aim: to study the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan as a component of first-line H. pylori eradication treatment compared with conventional PPI-based therapy. Material and methods: This randomised (one to one) non-blinded study was conducted on 400 consecutive proven H. pylori infected patients, of whom 200 received vonoprazan-based triple therapy, while 200 patients received PPI-based triple therapy for 14 days. The study outcomes were evaluated as eradication rate and adverse events in both patient groups. Results: The eradication rate was 86% in the vonoprazan group and 74.5% in the PPI group. The vonoprazan eradication rate was significantly higher than that of PPIs (p = 0.004). There was no significant difference regarding adverse events between both patient groups. Conclusions: Vonoprazan-based therapy was more effective than PPI-based therapy as a first-line H. pylori eradication treatment. Vonoprazan was generally safe and well tolerated.