Pancreatic pseudocyst: The past, the present, and the future.

A pancreatic pseudocyst is defined as an encapsulated fluid collection with a well-defined inflammatory wall with minimal or no necrosis. The diagnosis cannot be made prior to 4 wk after the onset of pancreatitis. The clinical presentation is often nonspecific, with abdominal pain being the most common symptom. If a diagnosis is suspected, contrast-enhanced computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging are performed to confirm the diagnosis and assess the characteristics of the pseudocyst. Endoscopic ultrasound with cyst fluid analysis can be performed in cases of diagnostic uncertainty. Pseudocyst of the pancreas can lead to complications such as hemorrhage, infection, and rupture. The management of pancreatic pseudocysts depends on the presence of symptoms and the development of complications, such as biliary or gastric outlet obstruction. Management options include endoscopic or surgical drainage. The aim of this review was to summarize the current literature on pancreatic pseudocysts and discuss the evolution of the definitions, diagnosis, and management of this condition.

A Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) and a Pseudocyst of the Pancreas: A Peculiar Case of Both Co-existing in the Same Patient.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, typically originating from the interstitial cells of Cajal. The clinical presentations are variable according to their size and shape but rarely present as a palpable abdominal mass. Pancreatic pseudocysts are common complications of chronic pancreatitis characterized by fluid collections surrounded by a non-epithelialized wall of fibrous and granulation tissue. Patients may present with non-specific symptoms like abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting and they generally have a history of acute pancreatitis. Small pseudocysts often resolve spontaneously, but larger ones often become symptomatic and may lead to complications. It is rare to find both a GIST of the stomach and a pseudocyst of the pancreas in the same patient. We present a unique case of a giant GIST and a pancreatic pseudocyst in a 72-year-old male who was experiencing abdominal pain and distension. Imaging revealed a massive lesion originating from the posterior gastric wall, which resembled a pseudocyst, along with a distinct cystic lesion adjacent to the pancreatic body. During surgical exploration, a complex interplay of both pathologies was discovered, requiring a comprehensive resection approach. The successful outcome highlights the importance of careful evaluation and personalized management in such rare cases.

Endoscopic Drainage of Pancreatic Pseudocysts: Clinical Profile and Outcome Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic pseudocyst is a complication of acute and chronic pancreatitis. Although surgery considered the gold standard, there is a rapid shift towards endoscopic treatment owing to its therapeutic outcome and minimal invasive involvement. This study aims to present the clinical profile and outcome analysis of the endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts in Dhulikhel Hospital. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all patients who were diagnosed with pancreatic pseudocyst between January 2015 and December 2018 in Dhulikhel Hospital. The retrospective data were on patient characteristics, etiology, location of the cyst, other clinical characteristics. RESULTS: The study included 51 patients and the average age of the patients in this study was 39 years and among them 62.7% were female. The mean size of pseudocyst was 7.89 cm, and the average days of hospital stay was 13.64. The most common etiology was idiopathic and more than half of the patient's cyst was in head and/or body, 15 and 36 underwent conservative and therapeutic management respectively. The technical success rate was at 94% and reported increased pancreatic pseudocyst in Dhulikhel Hospital from 2015-18. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings highlight the increased trend of pancreatitis pseudocyst as a complication of acute or chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopic drainage of pseudocyst with plastic stent is an established method of managing it. However, pancreatic pseudocyst even larger than 6 cm can undergo spontaneous resolution.Hence, conservative management should be considered first.

Poorly Controlled New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus and Other Atypical Signs as an Early Sign of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

A 50-year-old man presented with poorly controlled new-onset diabetes mellitus. Six months after diagnosis, episodes of intense abdominal pain with vomiting appeared. Abdominal CT revealed signs of acute pancreatitis with structural changes in the pseudocysts. In the absence of biliary lithiasis or a toxic etiology of acute pancreatitis, the patient progressed unfavorably with increased abdominal pain and fever. Control imaging tests (two and 10 months later) showed the evolution of phlegmonous/necrotic collections, together with portal vein thrombosis and splenomegaly. Given the suggestive signs of possible occult malignancy, such as portal thrombosis, histological analysis of the ascitic fluid revealed a pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Despite the initiation of chemotherapy, the patient died 12 months after diagnosis.

Coaxial plastic stent placement within lumen-apposing metal stents for the management of pancreatic fluid collections: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Background/Aims: Coaxial placement of double pigtail plastic stents (DPPS) through lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) is commonly performed to reduce the risk of LAMS obstruction, bleeding, and stent migration when used for the drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to compare the outcomes of LAMS alone and LAMS with coaxial DPPS placement in the management of PFCs. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies comparing LAMS and LAMS/DPPS for PFC drainage. Primary outcomes included the rate of clinical success, overall adverse events (AEs), bleeding, infection, occlusion, and stent migration. The pooled effect size was summarized using a random-effects model and compared between LAMS and LAMS/DPPS by calculating odds ratios (ORs). Results: Nine studies involving 709 patients were identified (338 on LAMS and 371 on LAMS/DPPS). LAMS/DPPS was associated with a reduced risk of stent obstruction (OR, 0.59; p=0.004) and infection (OR, 0.55; p=0.001). No significant differences were observed in clinical success (OR, 0.96; p=0.440), overall AEs (OR, 0.57; p=0.060), bleeding (OR, 0.61; p=0.120), or stent migration (OR, 1.03; p=0.480). Conclusions: Coaxial DPPS for LAMS drainage of PFCs is associated with a reduced risk of stent occlusion and infection; however, no difference was observed in the overall AE rates or bleeding.

Endoscopic Combined Drainage of One Giant and Multiple Small Pancreatic Pseudocysts: A Case Report.

A pancreatic pseudocyst (PPC) is a frequent complication of pancreatitis, often stemming from alcohol, gallstones, or hyperlipidemia. Endoscopic treatment of PPC has become the mainstream treatment. A case of one giant and multiple small PPCs was observed, manifesting as repeated abdominal bloating, abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting after meals. Initial computed tomography scans revealed the presence of multiple PPCs. Despite ineffective medical treatment, the pseudocysts progressively increased. In response, we conducted a combined endoscopic intervention, involving Hot AXIOS (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) stenting through endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage (EUS-TMD) and the placement of the endoscopic nasopancreatic drainage (ENPD) mimic stent through endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP). Remarkably, after nine months of postoperative follow-up, the patient had no discomfort symptoms and the cyst disappeared. We conducted a literature review on endoscopic combined drainage for PPCs, which is still controversial. Our presented case serves as a demonstration that endoscopic combined drainage can effectively and successfully manage giant and multiple PPCs.

Pancreatic Pseudocyst and Obesity: Video Case Report of Management with the One-Stage Procedure.

Reports of pancreatic pseudocyst drainage during metabolic bariatric surgery are extremely rare. Our patient is a 38-year-old female suffering from obesity grade IV and presents a persistent symptomatic pancreatic pseudocyst 8 months after an episode of acute biliary pancreatitis. After an extensive evaluation and considering other treatment options, our multidisciplinary team and the patient decided to perform a one-stage procedure consisting of laparoscopic cystogastrostomy, cholecystectomy, and one-anastomosis gastric bypass. After bringing the patient to the operating room, the surgeon performed an anterior gastrostomy to access the stomach's posterior wall, followed by a 6-cm cystogastrostomy on both the stomach's posterior wall and the cyst. Next, a cholecystectomy which involved dissecting the triangle of Calot was performed. Then, an 18-cm gastric pouch using a 36-Fr calibration tube was created. The cystogastrostomy was left in the remaining stomach. Finally, gastrojejunal anastomosis is done. The patient's postoperative course proceeded smoothly, leading to her home discharge on the third postoperative day. At the 1-year follow-up, the patient had lost 56 kg and was symptom-free; a computer tomography scan showed that the pancreatic pseudocyst had resolved. This case shows a video of a successful laparoscopic cystogastrostomy, cholecystectomy, and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) used to treat persistent abdominal pain and obesity grade IV. We also conduct a bibliographic review.

Tardive Peritonitis After Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Pancreatic Pseudocyst Drainage: A Case Report.

Here, we report a case of tardive peritonitis after endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transmural pancreatic pseudocyst drainage. A 50-year-old man was diagnosed with acute pancreatitis and a pancreatic pseudocyst measuring 5 cm. Ten months later, his pancreatic pseudocyst was 10 cm. We performed EUS-guided transmural drainage using a lumen-apposing metal stent. After two months, the stent was replaced with a double-pigtail plastic stent. Two months later, the patient developed fever and abdominal pain, and computed tomography revealed abdominal free air. He was diagnosed with peritonitis due to free air caused by a fistula rupture. The double-pigtail plastic stent was removed, and clipping was performed at the fistula site to achieve closure. The patient's symptoms subsequently improved. Long-term placement of a plastic stent for pancreatic pseudocysts makes recurrence less likely, but late adverse events due to stent placement can occur. Notably, fistula rupture can occur even when the fistula is well-formed several months after the initial drainage.

Unveiling Complexity: Black Pleural Effusion Due to a Pancreaticopleural Fistula.

Black pleural effusions (BPEs) are an exceedingly rare class of exudative effusions of unexplored causality. Their characteristic pitch-black coloring and striking first appearance upon thoracocentesis make them a bewildering occurrence even for seasoned physicians. Forming a free-from-error diagnostic work-up can be arduous and largely depends on thorough history-taking, deliberate imaging studies, and the correct biochemical profile. The upcoming article aims to raise awareness of this pathology by presenting our experience with a BPE after an episode of acute-on-chronic (ACP) pancreatitis and the confounding route to achieving the correct diagnosis and forming the precise therapeutic approach to this scenario. Keeping in mind that this is not a common clinical case, we strive to dispel some misconceptions and thus avoid any subsequent complications and delays in diagnosis when treating this type of effusions and their underlying pathology.

Equivalent efficacy and safety of plastic stents and lumen-apposing metal stents in the treatment of peripancreatic fluid collections: a prospective cohort study.

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transmural drainage using double pigtail plastic stents (DPPS) has been routine for the treatment of peripancreatic fluid collections (PFC). Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have since their introduction been the preferred choice; however, their superiority has not been proven. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of DPPS and LAMS. Methods: This was a single-center, prospective study that included consecutive patients undergoing EUS-guided drainage between January 2010 and December 2020. The primary endpoints were technical success, clinical success and adverse event rate, while the secondary endpoints included symptomatic relief, length of hospital stay, and need for adjunct drainage. A subgroup analysis of walled-off necrosis (WON) was performed. Results: A total of 89 patients (median age 56 years) underwent EUS-guided transmural drainage (DPPS: n=53; LAMS: n=36) because of a pseudocyst (n=37) or a WON (n=52). Both DPPS and LAMS had a 100% technical success rate and a comparable adverse event rate (4% vs. 6%, P=0.24). An equivalent efficacy was recorded for the drainage of PFC comparing DPPS and LAMS, and no significant statistical difference was recorded in clinical success (DPPS 60% vs. LAMS 61%, P=0.94) or the need for reintervention (DPPS 11% vs. LAMS 13%, P=0.72). Conclusions: In this large, prospective study of EUS-guided drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections, LAMS and DPPS showed equivalent safety, technical success, clinical success and hospital stay. Both techniques were associated with a comparable need for complementary necrosectomy.

The Importance of Early Detection and Minimally Invasive Treatment of Pseudoaneurysms Due to Chronic Pancreatitis: Case Report.

The occurrence of the pseudoaneurysm of visceral arteries in the field of chronic pancreatitis is a very rare complication that represents a life-threatening condition. The higher frequency of this complication is in the necrotic form of pancreatic inflammation, especially in patients with formed peripancreatic necrotic collections. The degradation of the arterial wall leads to bleeding and transforms these necrotic collections into a pseudoaneurysm. Urgent endovascular angioembolization is the first choice in the therapeutic approach as a valid minimally invasive solution with very satisfactory immediate and long-term outcomes. This successfully avoids open surgery, which is associated with a high mortality rate in these patients, especially in acute-on-chronic pancreatitis.

History of the Interventional Pancreaticobiliary Endoscopy.

With the introduction of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and linear endoscopic ultrasound, interventional pancreaticobiliary (PB) endoscopy has had an enormous impact in the management of pancreatic and biliary diseases. Continuous efforts to improve various devices and techniques have revolutionized these treatment modalities as viable alternatives to surgery. In recent years, trends toward combining endoscopic techniques with other modalities, such as laparoscopic and radiological interventions, for complex PB diseases have emerged using a multidisciplinary approach. Ongoing research and clinical experience will lead to refinements in interventional PB endoscopic techniques and subsequently improve outcomes and reduce complication rates.

A case of progressive xanthogranulomatous pancreatitis with splenic abscess.

Xanthogranulomatous inflammation is a chronic inflammatory reaction microscopically characterized by aggregation of foamy histiocytes, fibrous tissue, and infiltration of various inflammatory cells. In contrast to xanthogranulomatous inflammation in the gallbladder or kidney, xanthogranulomatous pancreatitis is rare. We herein present a case of xanthogranulomatous pancreatitis in a patient who underwent distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy under preoperative suspicion of a pancreatic pseudocyst or pancreatic tumor. A 77-year-old woman with a 1 month history of epigastric pain, anorexia, and general fatigue was admitted to our hospital. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a cystic mass with ill-defined margins at the pancreatic tail together with a splenic abscess. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound detected a hyperechoic cystic lesion at the tail of the pancreas with heterogeneous internal echogenicity, and part of the intra-cystic content was enhanced by the contrast agent. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography showed a cystic lesion at the tail of the pancreas that continued into the main pancreatic duct, and the main pancreatic duct was slightly narrowed downstream of the cystic lesion. Pancreatic juice cytology revealed suspicious cells, leading to the possibility of intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma. Distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy was performed, and the histopathological diagnosis was xanthogranulomatous pancreatitis with no malignant findings.

Endoscopic intramural cystogastrostomy for treatment of peripancreatic fluid collection: A viewpoint from a surgeon.

Percutaneous or endoscopic drainage is the initial choice for the treatment of peripancreatic fluid collection in symptomatic patients. Endoscopic transgastric fenestration (ETGF) was first reported for the management of pancreatic pseudocysts of 20 patients in 2008. From a surgeon's viewpoint, ETGF is a similar procedure to cystogastrostomy in that they both produce a wide outlet orifice for the drainage of fluid and necrotic debris. ETGF can be performed at least 4 wk after the initial onset of acute pancreatitis and it has a high priority over the surgical approach. However, the surgical approach usually has a better success rate because surgical cystogastrostomy has a wider outlet (> 6 cm vs 2 cm) than ETGF. However, percutaneous or endoscopic drainage, ETGF, and surgical approach offer various treatment options for peripancreatic fluid collection patients based on their conditions.

Early endoscopic management of an infected acute necrotic collection misdiagnosed as a pancreatic pseudocyst: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Infected acute necrotic collection (ANC) is a fatal complication of acute pancreatitis with substantial morbidity and mortality. Drainage plays an exceedingly important role as the first step in invasive intervention for infected necrosis; however, there is great controversy about the optimal drainage time, and better treatment should be explored. CASE SUMMARY: We report the case of a 43-year-old man who was admitted to the hospital with severe intake reduction due to early satiety 2 wk after treatment for acute pancreatitis; conservative treatment was ineffective, and a pancreatic pseudocyst was suspected on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) suggested hyperechoic necrotic tissue within the cyst cavity. The wall was not completely mature, and the culture of the puncture fluid was positive for A-haemolytic Streptococcus. Thus, the final diagnosis of ANC infection was made. The necrotic collection was not walled off and contained many solid components; therefore, the patient underwent EUS-guided aspiration and lavage. Two weeks after the collection was completely encapsulated, pancreatic duct stent drainage via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed, and the patient was subsequently successfully discharged. On repeat CT, the pancreatic cysts had almost disappeared during the 6-month follow-up period after surgery. CONCLUSION: Early EUS-guided aspiration and lavage combined with late ERCP catheter drainage may be effective methods for intervention in infected ANCs.

Polymicrobial Purulent Pericarditis From a Pancreatico-Pericardial Fistula.

A 54-year-old male with chronic pancreatitis presented with dyspnea. Computed tomography scans demonstrated a subdiaphragmatic fluid collection with pericardial fistulization. Pericardial fluid cultures were polymicrobial in nature. Purulent pericarditis is rare but carries a high mortality rate. We present the first documented case of pancreatico-pericardial fistulization causing purulent pericarditis.

Sinistral Portal Hypertension Due to a Pancreatic Pseudocyst: A Rare Cause of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Sinistral portal hypertension (SPH), also known as segmental portal hypertension, is a complication of pancreatic disorders and an extremely rare cause of upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. SPH is observed in patients without cirrhosis and arises from splenic vein thrombosis. Unmitigated backflow of blood may cause gastric venous congestion and ultimately GI hemorrhage. Herein, we report a rare case of massive hematemesis due to SPH in a male patient with a history of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic pseudocyst. Our patient was successfully treated with endoscopic necrosectomy followed by open splenectomy, distal pancreatectomy, and partial gastric resection.

Pancreatic Pseudocyst after Fully Covered Self-expandable Metallic Stent Placement: A Case Report.

A 70-year-old woman presented with stage III pancreatic head cancer. After endoscopic sphincterotomy, a fully covered self-expandable metallic stent (FCSEMS) was placed in the common bile duct to manage jaundice. The patient developed a fever and abdominal pain 40 days after stent placement, with a suspected diagnosis of infected pancreatic pseudocyst. Purulent discharge from the papilla was observed during FCSEMS removal, and pancreatography revealed a pseudocyst connected to the main pancreatic duct. The pancreatic pseudocyst resolved after transpapillary drainage. Pancreatic pseudocysts should be suspected after biliary FCSEMS placement, and prompt removal and endoscopic drainage of the FCSEMS should be considered.

Increasing trend of endoscopic drainage utilization for the management of pancreatic pseudocyst: insights from a nationwide database.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The pancreatic pseudocyst (PP) is a type of fluid collection that typically develops as a delayed complication of acute pancreatitis. Drainage is indicated for symptomatic patients and/or associated complications, such as infection and bleeding. Drainage modalities include percutaneous, endoscopic, laparoscopic, and open drainage. This study aimed to assess trends in the utilization of different drainage modalities for treating PP from 2016 to 2020. The trends in mortality, mean length of hospital stay, and mean hospitalization costs were also assessed. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database was used to obtain data. The variables were generated using International Classification of Diseases-10 diagnostic and procedural codes. RESULTS: Endoscopic drainage was the most commonly used drainage modality in 2018-2020, with an increasing trend over time (385 procedures in 2018 to 515 in 2020; p=0.003). This is associated with a decrease in the use of other drainage modalities. A decrease in the hospitalization cost for PP requiring drainage was also noted (29,318 United States dollar [USD] in 2016 to 18,087 USD in 2020, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic drainage is becoming the most commonly used modality for the treatment of PP in hospitals located in the US. This new trend is associated with decreasing hospitalization costs.

Intrahepatic pancreatic pseudocyst (wayward cyst): A rare presentation of traumatic pancreatitis.

INTRODUCTION: Cystic lesions in the liver are commonly encountered space-occupying lesions having various etiologies such as simple cysts, malignancies, hydatid cysts, and pancreatic pseudocysts. CASE PRESENTATION: An eight-year-old girl initially presented with acute abdominal pain, fever, and a cystic lesion in the upper abdomen. Surgical intervention was performed based on an initial diagnosis of an inflammatory cyst. Later, she developed pleural effusion. Further investigations, unveiled a cystic mass arising from the head of the pancreas, and a pancreatico-pleural fistula. Retrospective analysis revealed a history of trauma that started her illness course. Conservative management involving intercostal tube drainage and octreotide infusion resulted in a favorable outcome. DISCUSSION: Pancreatic pseudocyst is typically results from pancreatitis or trauma but in rare cases, they can have extended to unusual locations such as the liver. This case highlights the varied presentations and complex interplay of symptoms associated with intrahepatic pseudocysts. The initial oversight of trauma in the patient's history underscore the importance of thorough history-taking for an accurate diagnosis. The complexity of this case emphasize the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach in managing such atypical presentations. CONCLUSION: Intrahepatic pseudocysts, especially those resulting from post-traumatic pancreatic pseudocyst, are uncommon and are not typically included in the differential diagnosis of liver lesions. This case highlights the significance of identifying unusual presentation and thoroughly investigating the patient's medical history to make an accurate diagnosis. A multidisciplinary approach is essential for effective patient management in these complex cases.