Long-Term Redetachment Rates of Pneumatic Retinopexy versus Pars Plana Vitrectomy in Retinal Detachment: A PIVOT Post Hoc Analysis.

PURPOSE: To assess long-term redetachment rates of the Pneumatic Retinopexy versus Vitrectomy for the Management of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Outcomes Randomized Trial (PIVOT). DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SUBJECTS: PIVOT trial participants. METHODS: This study was performed at St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada. PIVOT trial participants who had undergone either pneumatic retinopexy (PnR) or pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were assessed for long-term redetachment by chart review or telephone interview. The latter was the only accepted method for those with <2 years of follow-up. Patients were only eligible if no reintervention to reattach the retina was performed within the first year of the initial procedure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Long-term redetachment rates for PnR vs. PPV after RRD repair. RESULTS: Sixty-one participants who underwent PPV and 62 who underwent PnR were analyzed. The long-term redetachment rates were 0% and 1.61% (1/62) in the PPV and PnR groups, respectively (P = 0.32). The mean follow-up duration in years was 5.43 ± 3.60 vs. 5.51 ± 3.03 in the PPV and PnR groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference in long-term redetachment rates for PnR vs. PPV. Both procedures are durable treatment options for RRD over an extended period, rarely requiring additional intervention for redetachment. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Updates on Treatment Modalities for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair.

Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, a severe eye condition, presents anatomic separation of the neurosensory retina from its outermost layer-the retinal pigment epithelium. Early recognition of this relatively common finding and proper referral of patients to the retinal surgery department is essential in order to minimize its consequent possible severe reduction in vision. Several major surgical methods for the repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment have been in use over the last several decades, and they all aim to find and close the break in the retina that has caused the detachment. Surgery can be performed as pneumatic retinopexy, pars plana vitrectomy, and/or episcleral surgery (buckling). General surgical trends for reattaching the retina include moving from extraocular to intraocular surgery and from bigger gauge to smaller gauge via minimal invasive vitrectomy surgery (MIVS), with implementing shorter-lasting intraocular tamponades. Surgical options for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment treatment nowadays emphasize gaining retinal reattachment, preferably with one surgery and with minimum damage to the eye. The procedure should not bring secondary eye conditions and complications with severe impairment of visual acuity, and it should be performed on as much as a smaller budget, with possibly peribulbar anesthesia, enabling the patient the quickest possible recovery. It should be adjusted to the patient's condition, not to the surgeon's skills or preferences.

Pneumatic retinopexy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: from a clinical trial to the real-life experience.

BACKGROUND: To report real-world outcomes of patients with primary Reghmatogenous Retinal Detachment (RRD) treated with Pneumatic Retinopexy (PnR) according to the indications of the Pneumatic Retinopexy versus Vitrectomy for management of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Outcomes Randomized Trial (PIVOT) trial. METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective study. Patients treated with PnR for RRD between 2021 and 2023 and a follow-up of at least 6 months were included. Single-procedure anatomical success, final anatomical success, complications, causes of failures, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after surgery, and the vision-related quality of life using the 25-Item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) were reported. RESULTS: A total of 76 eyes of 76 patients were included. Mean age was 60 ± 8.1 years. Primary anatomic reattachment was achieved by 84.3% of patients and final anatomical reattachment after pars plana vitrectomy was obtained in 100% of patients. BCVA improved from 0.32 (20/40) to 0.04 (20/20) logMar (p < 0.001) at 6 months. The main cause of failure was related to the presence of additional (likely missed) retinal breaks (66.6% of cases). Also, primary PnR failure was more frequent in eyes of patients with older age, macular involvement, worse baseline BCVA, greater extent of the RRD, and increased duration from diagnosis to treatment. Overall, the mean NEI-VFQ 25 composite score was 93.9% ± 6.4 at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The criteria of the PIVOT trial can be applied to real-world scenarios in the decision-making process for the treatment of primary RRD, with excellent anatomical and functional outcomes.

Case report: Advanced modified pneumatic retinopexy for treating simultaneous bilateral rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Background: Simultaneous bilateral rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is a rare and challenging condition in ophthalmology. This case report focuses on a modified pneumatic retinopexy technique, designed to improve treatment outcomes for this difficult condition. Case presentation: A 59-year-old male presented with decreased visual acuity in his right eye for one week. Examination revealed extensive retinal detachment in the right eye with multiple superior breaks and macula off, separated by approximately 3 clock hours. The left eye exhibited one quartile of retinal detachment with superior breaks and macula on. Bilateral simultaneous PR was performed for retinal repair. In the modified PR procedure, 0.7 ml of low-concentration perfluoropropane and 0.7 ml of filtered pure air were intravitreally injected into the right and left eyes, respectively. A head position maneuver was then employed to sequentially close retinal breaks, followed by laser photocoagulation once the surrounding retina reattached. Two days after gas injection, both retinas were completely reattached. Best corrected visual acuity improved to 0.6 in the right eye and 0.9 in the left eye at the 8-month follow-up. Conclusion: The innovative modified pneumatic retinopexy technique presented in this case report offers a promising new approach for effectively treating simultaneous bilateral rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Performance of Automated Machine Learning in Predicting Outcomes of Pneumatic Retinopexy.

Purpose: Automated machine learning (AutoML) has emerged as a novel tool for medical professionals lacking coding experience, enabling them to develop predictive models for treatment outcomes. This study evaluated the performance of AutoML tools in developing models predicting the success of pneumatic retinopexy (PR) in treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). These models were then compared with custom models created by machine learning (ML) experts. Design: Retrospective multicenter study. Participants: Five hundred and thirty nine consecutive patients with primary RRD that underwent PR by a vitreoretinal fellow at 6 training hospitals between 2002 and 2022. Methods: We used 2 AutoML platforms: MATLAB Classification Learner and Google Cloud AutoML. Additional models were developed by computer scientists. We included patient demographics and baseline characteristics, including lens and macula status, RRD size, number and location of breaks, presence of vitreous hemorrhage and lattice degeneration, and physicians' experience. The dataset was split into a training (n = 483) and test set (n = 56). The training set, with a 2:1 success-to-failure ratio, was used to train the MATLAB models. Because Google Cloud AutoML requires a minimum of 1000 samples, the training set was tripled to create a new set with 1449 datapoints. Additionally, balanced datasets with a 1:1 success-to-failure ratio were created using Python. Main Outcome Measures: Single-procedure anatomic success rate, as predicted by the ML models. F2 scores and area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) were used as primary metrics to compare models. Results: The best performing AutoML model (F2 score: 0.85; AUROC: 0.90; MATLAB), showed comparable performance to the custom model (0.92, 0.86) when trained on the balanced datasets. However, training the AutoML model with imbalanced data yielded misleadingly high AUROC (0.81) despite low F2-score (0.2) and sensitivity (0.17). Conclusions: We demonstrated the feasibility of using AutoML as an accessible tool for medical professionals to develop models from clinical data. Such models can ultimately aid in the clinical decision-making, contributing to better patient outcomes. However, outcomes can be misleading or unreliable if used naively. Limitations exist, particularly if datasets contain missing variables or are highly imbalanced. Proper model selection and data preprocessing can improve the reliability of AutoML tools. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Epiretinal Membrane Formation following Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the incidence of and risk factors for epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation following primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair. METHODS: This comparative, retrospective, single-center cohort study included eyes with primary RRD treated between 2011 and 2023 at Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), scleral buckle (SB), PPV+SB, or pneumatic retinopexy (PnR). Demographic, clinical, and surgical parameters were collected from medical records. The primary outcome was the risk of ERM formation, while the secondary outcome was the risk of ERM requiring surgery. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression were performed, and a hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were reported. RESULTS: Overall, 394 eyes were included. The mean age was 58.49 ± 12.8 years, and most patients were male. There was a significantly lower risk of ERM formation following SB compared to PPV in the univariable analysis (HR = 0.2, 95% CI = 0.08-0.60, p = 0.003); however, there was no significant association between treatment modality and ERM formation on multivariable Cox regression controlling for confounding factors (p = 0.24). ERM formation was found more commonly in patients who were older (HR = 1.0 per 1 year increase in age, 95% CI = 1.01-1.04, p = 0.001), those with worse baseline visual acuity (HR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.09-1.71, p = 0.008), and those with macula-off RRDs (HR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.41-3.32, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Surgical modality does not have a significant impact on the risk of ERM following retinal detachment repair. However, age, baseline visual acuity, and macular status are important predictors of ERM formation after RRD repair.

Outcomes and variables that impact pneumatic retinopexies.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of pneumatic retinopexy (PR) in patients undergoing PR as primary treatment for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and analyze the factors associated with success and failure in the studied population. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was done of patients with RRD treated with PR as primary management method treated at New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai between January 2017 and December 2021. Primary outcome measured success or failure of PR. Secondary outcome measured best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after PR. A separate risk analysis was done to identify and stratify risks associated with success and failure of PR. RESULTS: A total of 179 eyes from 179 patients were included for final analysis. The 83 patients (46.37%) achieved anatomical reattachment of the retina after primary PR with no need for additional surgery. The 96 patients (53.63%) had a failed primary PR and required a PPV and 6 of them required pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with scleral buckle (SB). In total, 19 cases (10.61%) were done as temporizing pneumatics, 18 (94.74%) underwent PPV, and 1 (5.26%) did not require further intervention. The visual acuities at postoperative month 1 (POM1) for patients who underwent primary PR successfully and for those that underwent PPV after, were 0.58 (20/80) and 1.03 (20/200) respectively. Patients who met Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Vitrectomy for the Management of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Outcomes Randomized Trial (PIVOT) criteria had a statistically significant decreased risk of primary PR failing (hazard ratio 0.29, P=0.00). Majority of missed or new breaks were found superotemporally. CONCLUSION: PR is a good treatment option for treating RRDs in patients that meet PIVOT criteria and can be conducted as a temporizing measure. PIVOT criteria and fovea on status decrease the risk of PR failure.

Outcomes of Scleral Buckling After Failed Pneumatic Retinopexy.

Purpose: To assess the visual and anatomic outcomes of eyes that had secondary scleral buckle (SB) surgery after unsuccessful pneumatic retinopexy (PR) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Methods: A retrospective study, performed over a 12-year period, comprised patients who had secondary SB procedures after failed primary PR. Clinical parameters (eg, best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA], lens status, macula status, details of RRD and subretinal fluid) were assessed at presentation, before additional procedures, and at follow-up (6 months, 1 year, and last visit). Statistical comparisons were made using Brown-Forsythe and Welch analysis-of-variance tests, with significance levels set at P < .05. Results: Fifty-four eyes with adequate follow-up were included. Forty-four (81.5%) of 54 eyes had successful retinal reattachment with secondary SB alone. The remaining eyes had subsequent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Patients presenting with macula-on RRD who had successful secondary SB had no statistically significant change in BCVA from baseline (mean final, 0.23 ± 0.25 logMAR [Snellen 20/34]; P = .999). There was a statistically significant improvement in BCVA in patients presenting with macula-off RRD who had successful secondary SB (mean final, 0.32 ± 0.36 logMAR [20/42]; P < .001 and mean change, -1.06 ± 0.85 logMAR). Ten patients presenting with macula-off RRD who had failed secondary SB had a significant improvement in the final BCVA (mean final, 0.22 ± 0.28 logMAR [20/33]; P = .044), despite the need for an additional PPV to achieve reattachment. Conclusions: Secondary SB remains a good option for RRD repair after unsuccessful PR and may avoid the need for PPV.

Quality of Life after Pars Plana Vitrectomy, Scleral Buckle, or Pneumatic Retinopexy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: Comparisons of the surgical and anatomic results of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery have been investigated previously. A systematic evaluation of the available evidence comparing quality of life outcomes of either pars plana vitrectomy, scleral buckling, or pneumatic retinopexy has not been evaluated to date. This article analyzes whether pars plana vitrectomy, scleral buckling, or pneumatic retinopexy for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment results in differing quality of life outcomes. METHODS: In February of 2022, a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL, and Cochrane Library was conducted for studies on patients treated surgically for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and included follow-up measurements of quality of life outcomes. Meta-analysis was completed using STATA v. 14.0. The main outcomes of interest were the mean vision-related quality of life score (VRQOL) and SD of VRQOL of each type of surgical procedure. RESULTS: In this systematic review of 13 distinct trials including follow-up of patient quality of life after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery (n = 1063), a better correlation was found between higher quality of life outcomes with scleral buckling than with pars plana vitrectomy (SMD = 0.62, CI: [0.31, 0.93]). There was also no signficant difference in quality of life outcomes between pneumatic retinopexy and pars plana vitrectomy (SMD = 0.08, CI: [-0.07, 0.22]). CONCLUSIONS: Scleral buckling results in better quality of life outcomes for patients when compared to pars plana vitrectomy. Pneumatic retinopexy did not show a difference in quality of life outcomes compared to pars plana vitrectomy.

Retinopexia neumática para el tratamiento de desprendimientos regmatógenos de retina seleccionados / Pneumatic Retinopexy for Treating Selected Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachments

Objetivo: Determinar los resultados anatómicos y funcionales en pacientes operados de desprendimiento de retina regmatógeno con técnica de retinopexia neumática. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo, longitudinal y prospectivo con pacientes operados con técnica de retinopexia neumática en el Centro Oftalmológico de Villa Clara entre junio del 2019 y abril del 2023. Resultados: La edad media de los pacientes estudiados fue de 62,1años. Los hombres fueron más afectados que las mujeres (60,6 por ciento). El 57,6 por ciento de los ojos tuvo agudeza visual mejor corregida de movimiento de manos al diagnóstico y el 93,9 por ciento mácula desprendida. En el 66,7 por ciento de las operaciones se utilizó el hexafloruro de azufre como tamponador. Se logró el éxito anatómico con una intervención en el 81,8 por ciento (IC 95 por ciento: 80-83,6 por ciento) de los casos. En estos, se alcanzó el éxito funcional en el 85,2 por ciento (IC 95 por ciento: 83,4 -87 por ciento). Los ojos con éxito anatómico alcanzaron como media una agudeza visual mejor corregida de 0,5 décimas (IC 95 por ciento: 0,2-0,7) y se logró una ganancia media de 0,4 décimas (IC 95 por ciento: 0,3-0,5). La complicación más frecuente fue la persistencia de líquido subretinal residual, el cual se presentó con más frecuencia en pacientes mayores de 60 años y desapareció como promedio a los 55,9 días sin necesidad de tratamiento. Conclusiones: La retinopexia neumática es una muy buena opción para tratar desprendimientos de retina seleccionados. En pacientes con ninguna o mínima vitreorretinopatía proliferativa, se logran buenos resultados anatómicos y funcionales(AU)

Objective: To determine the anatomical and functional results in patients operated on for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using the pneumatic retinopexy technique. Methods: A descriptive, longitudinal and prospective study was conducted with patients operated on using the pneumatic retinopexy technique at Centro Oftalmológico, of Villa Clara Province, Cuba, between June 2019 and April 2023. Results: The mean age of the studied patients was 62.1 years. Men were more affected than women (60.6 percent). 57.6 percent of the eyes had best-corrected visual acuity of hand movement at diagnosis and 93.9 percent had detached macula. Sulfur hexafluoride was used as a buffer solution in 66.7 percent of the operations. Anatomical success was achieved with one operation in 81.8 percent (95 percent CI: 80-83.6 percent) of cases. In these, functional success was achieved in 85.2 percent (95 percent CI: 83.4-87 percent). The anatomically successful eyes achieved a mean best-corrected visual acuity of 0.5 tenths (95 percent CI: 0.2-0.7), apart from a mean gain of 0.4 tenths (95 percent CI: 0.3-0.5). The most frequent complication was the persistence of residual subretinal fluid, which occurred more frequently in patients older than 60 years and disappeared, on average, at 55.9 days without the need for treatment. Conclusions: Pneumatic retinopexy is a very good option to treat selected retinal detachments. In patients with no or minimal proliferative vitreoretinopathy, good anatomical and functional results are achieved(AU)

Efficacy of pneumatic retinopexy in young adults with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Background: In young adults with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, pneumatic retinopexy can be a cost-effective and minimally invasive highly effective method in suitable cases. Objectives: To evaluate the role of pneumatic retinopexy in the treatment of young adults with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and the factors that may affect the success of pneumatic retinopexy. Design: Retrospective study. Methods: The study included 67 eyes of 67 patients aged between 21 and 40 who underwent pneumatic retinopexy (PR) between January 2015 and June 2021 for primary RRD. We retrospectively analyzed the prognostic factors that may affect the success of PR, such as preoperative age, best corrected visual acuity, tear site, lens condition, and axial length. Results: PR was successful in 61.2% of the patients, whereas 38.8% required secondary surgery. Between the group that had a single surgery (Group 1) and the group that required secondary surgery (Group 2) the tear location, axial length, and volumes of gases used were statistically different (p = 0.04, p < 0.001, and p = 0.02, respectively). There was a significant difference in visual acuity before and after surgery in the group that was successful with a single surgery (Friedman χ2 = 40.051, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of intraocular pressure (p > 0.05), and glaucoma was not observed in the postoperative period. Conclusion: Since it is a minimally invasive and cost-effective method that provides rapid visual rehabilitation, it can be considered as first-line therapy in young adults who are suitable for PR.

Evolution of demarcation line after pneumatic retinopexy-a case report.

BACKGROUND: Demarcation line in a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD) is a classic finding noted in chronic cases. In this case report, we describe a case of evolution of post-operative demarcation line after pneumatic retinopexy (PnR) in a subtotal rhegmatogenous RD. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 31-year-old male diagnosed with acute, subtotal, macula-off rhegmatogenous RD in the left eye of 15-day duration underwent PnR on the same day. His presenting visual acuity was 6/48 in the left eye. Transconjunctival cryopexy was performed to the retinal break at the same sitting and 0.5 cc of 100% perfluoroproprane (C3F8) gas was injected in the vitreous cavity and right lateral position was advised to the patient. RESULT: A pigmentary demarcation line was noted extending the nasal part of the macula along the most dependent part of the detachment on the immediate post-operative day and was more obviously visible on the 2nd and then on the 11th post-operative day. The visual acuity at the last follow-up visit improved to 6/18. Successful reattachment of the retina was noted on the last follow-up visit. CONCLUSION: Post-operative demarcation lines after RD surgery could develop due to subretinal migration of pigments and along the most-dependent part depending upon post-operative positioning of the patient. Careful post-operative positioning, particularly in macula splitting RDs could be important to avoid pigment accumulation along the foveal area.

Pneumatic Retinopexy: An Experience of 12 Years at a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Purpose The purpose of this study is to retrospectively analyze single-operation success (SOS) rates of pneumatic retinopexy (PR) for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and to identify the predictors of treatment outcomes. Methods Sixty-one eyes of 61 patients who underwent PR for RRD during a period of 12 years were included in this study. Patient demographics along with pre-treatment clinical characteristics were recorded. Treatment outcomes in terms of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and anatomical characteristics were reported including any post-operative complications. Visual outcomes were compared according to pre-treatment characteristics and between groups of the eyes achieving SOS and those requiring additional surgery. Results SOS was achieved in 37 (61%) eyes. Twenty-four (39%) eyes required one (36%) or two (3%) additional procedures. There was no significant association between pre-treatment characteristics and treatment failure. SOS eyes had significantly better visual outcomes (P=0.002), and so did those with macula-on status (P=0.003). New/missed breaks (9.8%) and proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) (4.9%) were the most common causes of failure. Conclusions We found PR to be a beneficial technique for the treatment of RRD in this cohort. PR remains the least invasive treatment modality, and as a cost-effective technique, it is especially useful in low/middle-income countries such as Pakistan.

Outer Retinal Hyperreflective Dots: A Potential Imaging Biomarker in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.

PURPOSE: To investigate hyperreflective dots (HRDs) on baseline OCT in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: Consecutive primary fovea-off RRDs presenting between January 2012 and September 2022. METHODS: Visual acuity (VA) was obtained at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Baseline foveal OCT scans were graded for the presence of HRDs in the outer retina, morphologic stage of RRD in the parafovea, and foveal photoreceptor integrity (intact, patchy or complete loss of the bacillary layer). Epiretinal membrane (ERM) and cystoid macular edema (CME) were graded after surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in each morphologic stage with HRDs present on OCT and their association with postoperative VA. Secondary outcomes included association with the height of foveal detachment, duration of central vision loss, RRD extent, and development of ERM/CME. RESULTS: A total of 351 patients were included. The presence of HRDs by morphologic stage of RRD was 0% in stage 1, 4.5% (2/42) in stage 2, 13% (7/54) in stage 3a, 16% (20/126) in stage 3b, 48% (40/83) in stage 4, and 85% (35/41) in stage 5. Hyperreflective dots were associated with increasing stage of RRD (P < 0.001), reduced integrity of foveal photoreceptors (P < 0.001), and reduced postoperative VA at 3, 6, and 12 months (P < 0.001), after excluding visually significant cataracts and adjusting for covariates. There was also a significant association between HRDs and height of foveal detachment, duration of central vision loss, and RRD extent (P < 0.001). Hyperreflective dots were neither associated with postoperative ERM formation nor with its severity (P = 0.27). Nevertheless, they were associated with the occurrence of CME at 3 and 6 months after surgery (P = 0.01; P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Hyperreflective dots have been hypothesized to consist of intraretinal inflammatory cells. We found that HRDs were significantly associated with the morphologic stage, extent, duration, and height of the RRD before surgery and with reduced VA and CME after surgery. Our results suggest that HRDs are associated with photoreceptor degeneration, as longstanding and extensive RRDs are more likely to present with HRDs. The association of HRDs with CME provides insight into the possible importance of inflammatory processes in RRD before and after surgery. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Pneumatic Retinopexy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment in Elderly Patients.

PURPOSE: To assess clinical outcomes in elderly patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent pneumatic retinopexy (PnR) for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: Patients aged ≥ 75 years with primary RRD undergoing PnR. METHODS: This study evaluates clinical outcomes among eligible patients who presented from October 1, 2010, to December 31, 2022, with a minimum of 3 months' follow-up. There were no limitations with respect to the number, size, or location of retinal breaks. Exclusion criteria included significant proliferative vitreoretinopathy or previous retinal detachment repair in the index eye, inability to maintain the postoperative posturing requirements or inability to carry out adequate examination of the peripheral retina because of media opacity. Lens status did not impact the decision to offer PnR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pneumatic retinopexy primary anatomic reattachment rate and postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 3 months. RESULTS: Eighty patients with a mean age of 80.6 ± 4.6 years were included in this study; 35% (28/80) were phakic and 34% (27/80) presented with a fovea-on RRD. The mean number of breaks in the detached retina was 1.52 ± 1.13, and the mean number of quadrants of detached retina was 2.35 ± 0.93. The primary anatomic reattachment rate at 3 months after PnR was 78.8% (63/80), whereas the remaining 21.2% (17/80) failed PnR and underwent an operating room procedure. There was a statistically significant improvement in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) BCVA from baseline to 3 months (1.29 ± 0.94 and 0.69 ± 0.67, respectively, P < 0.001). A subgroup analysis that only included patients aged > 80 years was also performed, with a total of 39 patients with a mean age of 84.4 ± 3.5 years. The primary anatomic reattachment rate with PnR in this subgroup was 74.4% (29/39), with a statistically significant improvement in BCVA from baseline to 3 months (1.4 ± 1.05 and 0.77 ± 0.70, respectively; P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients treated with PnR for primary RRD had relatively comparable primary anatomic reattachment rates with other surgical techniques such as pars plana vitrectomy and scleral buckle. Pneumatic retinopexy is an effective, minimally invasive office-based procedure that may be desirable for some elderly patients. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

A Useful Method for the Practice of Pneumatic Retinopexy: Slit-Lamp Laser Photocoagulation through the Gas Bubble.

This study aimed to demonstrate the laser retinopexy method through the gas bubble under a slit-lamp biomicroscope using a wide-field contact lens to treat rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) with pneumatic retinopexy (PR) and report its anatomical and functional results. This single-center, retrospective case series included RRD patients treated with PR using sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). The demographics, preoperative factors, and anatomical and functional outcomes were collected from the patient files. The single-procedure success rate of PR at postoperative 6th months was 70.8% (17/24 eyes), and the final success rate after secondary surgeries was 100%. The BCVA was better in the successful PR eyes at postoperative 3rd (p = 0.011) and 6th month (p = 0.016) than in failed eyes. No single preoperative factor was associated with PR success. The single-procedure success rate of PR using the laser retinopexy method through the gas bubble with a wide-field contact lens system seems comparable to the PR literature.

Pneumatic Retinopexy Involving the Use of Intravitreal Air Injection and Laser Photocoagulation for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment in Phakic Eyes.

The clinical efficacy of pneumatic retinopexy (PR) using intravitreal pure air injection and laser photocoagulation for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) remains unknown. Thirty-nine consecutive patients with RRD (39 eyes) were included in this prospective case series. All patients underwent two-step PR surgery containing pure air intravitreal injection and laser photocoagulation retinopexy during hospitalization. The main outcomes were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and primary anatomic success rates after PR treatment. The mean follow-up was 18.3 ± 9.7 months, ranging from 6 to 37 months. The primary anatomic success rate was 89.7% (35/39) after PR treatment. Final reattachment of the retina was achieved in 100% of cases. Macular epiretinal membrane was developed in two patients (5.7%) among successful PR cases during the follow-up. The mean logMAR BCVA value was significantly improved from 0.94 ± 0.69 before surgery to 0.39 ± 0.41 after surgery. The average central retinal thickness was significantly thinner in the RRD eyes of macula-off patients (206.8 ± 56.13 µm) when compared with the fellow eyes (234.6 ± 48.4 µm) at the last follow-up (p = 0.005). This study concluded that an inpatient PR procedure with pure air injection and laser photocoagulation is a safe and effective approach to treating patients with RRD, who may achieve a high single-operation success rate and good visual acuity recovery.

Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Pars Plana Vitrectomy for the Management of Retinal Detachment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Pneumatic retinopexy (PnR) was proposed as an alternative to pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in certain circumstances. PnR is an outpatient procedure and more cost-effective. However, its benefits should be judged alongside its success rate and adverse events. Herein, we compare the efficacy and safety of PnR and PPV for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases. Observational and interventional studies comparing the efficacy and safety of PnR and PPV were included. The outcomes were the success rate of the treatment, improvement in visual acuity, and adverse event rates. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the lens and macula status. Eleven articles were eligible to enter our study; these consisted of 11,346 patients with a mean age of 74.1. RESULTS: PnR was superior to PPV in terms of retinal displacement, photoreceptor integrity, visual function, and vertical metamorphopsia scores. In the meta-analysis, PPV showed higher a reattachment rate than PnR (OR = 3.39, 95% CI 2.25-5.11). Subgroup analysis showed that the advantage of PPV over PnR was more pronounced in studies with fewer phakic eyes, more macula-on patients, and in cases with primary PnR failure. While PnR patients had better pre-op (SMD = - 0.58, 95% CI = - 1.16 to 0.00) and post-op (SMD = - 0.45, 95% CI = - 0.60 to - 0.30) LogMAR, the improvement in visual acuity after surgery was higher in PPV patients (SMD = 0.49, 95% CI = - 0.15 to 1.13). CONCLUSION: The success rate of PnR was higher in studies published after 2015 compared to previous studies (82% vs. 59%). Cataract formation and surgery were significantly higher in the PPV arm, while the occurrence of new retinal tears was more frequent in the PnR group. PnR can be used as the primary procedure for RRD repair in selected cases. However, we propose some modifications to the PIVOT criteria, e.g., the exclusion of cases presenting with several risk factors of poor outcomes.

Pneumatic retinopexy versus scleral buckling for the management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare pneumatic retinopexy (PnR) and scleral buckling (SB) for repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-centre retrospective analysis of patients undergoing PnR and SB. Inclusion criteria comprehend phakic patients with a single retinal break or a group of breaks in detached retina in the same quadrant above the 8- and 4-o'clock meridians. A total of 184 patients were included, respectively 106 underwent PnR and 78 SB. Follow-up time was 6 months. RESULTS: Final visual outcome did not differ significantly between the two procedures (P = 0.12). Single-procedure reattachment rate was significantly higher in SB (94%) than in PnR (68%) (P < 0001). Anatomical success rate was not influenced by macular involving. Reattachment rate in repeated PnR was 95% and in these patients visual outcome did not statistically differ compared to those reattached with first attempt (P = 0.196). Total reattachment rate including repeated procedures was 87% in PnR group and 94% in SB group, the difference was not significant (P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: SB has a higher single reattachment rate than PnR. However, final visual outcomes of both procedures are comparable. In selected cases, PnR can be repeated with a high successful rate.