RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Following the COVID-19 pandemic, millions of people continue to experience ongoing physical and mental health sequelae after recovery from acute infection. There is currently no specific treatment for the diverse symptoms associated with post-COVID-19 condition. Physical and mental health rehabilitation may help improve quality of life in such patients. This study reports the cost-effectiveness of a programme of physical and mental health rehabilitation compared to best practice usual care in people with post-COVID-19 condition who were previously hospitalised. METHODS: We conducted an economic evaluation within a randomised controlled trial from the perspective of the UK national health service (NHS) and personnel social services perspective (PSS). Resource used and health-related quality of life were collected using bespoke questionnaire and the EQ-5D-5 L questionnaire at three, six, and 12 months. Incremental costs and quality adjusted life years accrued over the follow-up period were estimated and reported as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Estimate uncertainty was managed by multiple imputation and bootstrapping cost-effectiveness estimates; and displayed graphically on the cost-effectiveness plane. RESULTS: Over a 12-month time horizon, incremental costs and QALYs were £305 (95% CI: -123 to 732) and 0.026 (95% CI: -0.005 to 0.052) respectively. The ICER was £11,941 per QALY indicating cost-effective care. Sensitivity analyses supported the base case findings. The probability of the intervention being cost-effective at a £30,000 per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold was 84%. CONCLUSION: The within-trial economic evaluation suggested that people with post-COVID-19 condition after hospitalisation should be offered a programme of physical and mental health rehabilitation as it likely reflects a cost-effective use of NHS resources. Hospitalisation for COVID-19 has become less commonplace: further evaluation in non-hospitalised patients may be worthwhile. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry ISRCTN11466448 23rd November 2020.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , COVID-19/rehabilitación , COVID-19/economía , COVID-19/epidemiología , Masculino , Reino Unido , Femenino , Adulto , Hospitalización/economía , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Calidad de Vida , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2 , Medicina Estatal/economía , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19RESUMEN
COVID-19 can lead to pulmonary complications, including organizing pneumonia. Steroids are essential in treating post-COVID-19 organizing pneumonia. However, research on the clinical benefits of initiating steroid treatment early for this condition is limited. To investigate the steroid initiation time in its association with treatment duration and corticosteroid dose for treating post-COVID-19 organizing pneumonia, we analyzed the data of 91 patients with post-COVID-19 organizing pneumonia at Chonnam National University Hospital between October 2020 and December 2022. Patients were categorized into early and late groups based on time from COVID-19 diagnosis to steroid initiation time for organizing pneumonia. The mean time interval between COVID-19 infection and steroid initiation time for treating organizing pneumonia, was 18.4±8.6 days. Within the early treatment group (treatment initiated <18.4 days after COVID-19), which included 55 patients, the mean duration of steroid treatment was 43.1±18.3days. In contrast, the late treatment group (initiated ≥18.4 days after COVID-19), which consisted of 36 patients, had a longer mean duration of steroid treatment 59.1±22.6 days) (p<0.01). Regarding corticosteroid dosing, the early treatment group had an average dosage of 0.5±0.3 mg/kg/day, in contrast to the late group, which averaged 0.8±0.3 mg/kg/day (p<0.01). Regression analysis showed steroid initiation time significantly influenced treatment duration (ß=0.80 , p<0.01) and dosage (ß=0.03, p<0.01). The clinical benefits of early steroid treatment for post-COVID-19 organizing pneumonia may lie in its association with reduced steroid treatment duration and dosage.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: After COVID-19 infection, long-term impacts on functioning may occur. We studied the functioning of patients with post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) and compared them to controls without PCC. METHODS: This cross-sectional study consisted of 442 patients with PCC referred to rehabilitation at the Helsinki University Hospital (HUS) Outpatient Clinic for the Long-Term Effects of COVID-19, and 198 controls without PCC. Functioning was assessed with a questionnaire including WHODAS 2.0. Patients underwent physical testing including a hand grip strength test (HGST) and a 6-minute walking test (6MWT). Lifestyle was assessed by questionnaire and comorbidities were collected as ICD-10 codes from the HUS Data Lake on the HUS Acamedic platform. RESULTS: The WHODAS 2.0 average total score was 34 (SD 18) (moderate functional limitation) for patients with PCC and 6 (SD 8) (normal or mild limitation) for the controls. The disability was higher in all aspects of WHODAS 2.0 in patients with PCC. Bivariate binomial and multivariable regression analyses showed that the presence of comorbidities, anxiety, depression, and smoking predicted a WHODAS 2.0 score of 24 (moderate functional limitation) or above in the PCC group. The average 6MWT distance was 435 m (SD 98 m) in patients with PCC and 627 m (SD 70 m) in controls. HGST measurements showed no significant differences from controls. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, patients with PCC had significantly reduced functioning based on WHODAS 2.0 scores and the 6MWT results. Comorbidities, anxiety, depression, and smoking were associated with moderate or severe limitations in functioning. Findings support that PCC is multifactorial and requires a holistic approach to rehabilitation.
The post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) has been shown to negatively impact functioning, quality of life, and mental health, with cognitive and physical impairments being prevalent.This study found that patients with PCC had significantly reduced functioning compared to controls.Key factors predicting severe disability included comorbidities, smoking, and mental health issues like anxiety and depression.The reduced functioning in patients with PCC appears to be multifactorial and not only related to COVID-19 infection.
RESUMEN
Background: Our study discusses the probable etiologies and characteristics of pulmonary cavities in post-COVID-19 patients. A pulmonary cavity is a late complication of the disease, yet it has led to multiple referrals to our tertiary hospital in Tehran, Iran. Methods: We conducted a retrospective case-series study on 20 patients who were admitted to our center between April 2020 and September 2021. They were all diagnosed with COVID-19 and concomitantly developed pulmonary cavities. We assessed their electronic medical records in 2021 and compared their characteristics with other studies based on the available literature. Result: Of the 20 patients with cavities, 12 (60%) had been diagnosed with prior COVID-19, and 9 (45%) had type 2 diabetes mellitus. 9 patients (45%) had bacterial superinfections while 4 (44%) had fungal infections. All patients received corticosteroids, but only 4 (20%) were additionally administered Tocilizumab. Conclusion: COVID-19 patients can develop pulmonary cavities during recovery; however, this infrequent radiologic finding depends on specific risk factors.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Altered immune response and cognitive difficulties have been demonstrated in studies of post-COVID syndrome, including differences in immune status and cognitive functioning in the months following infection. This review aimed to examine immune status and cognitive differences in post-COVID Syndrome twelve or more weeks after COVID-19 infection. A further aim of this review was to explore a link between immune response and the cognitive deficits observed in this group. METHODS: A systematic review was carried out of PubMed, PsychInfo, EMBASE and Web of Science electronic databases of observational studies 12+ weeks after COVID-19 infection, with assessment of immune status and cognitive function in post-COVID Syndrome samples. This review protocol was recorded on PROSPERO with registration number CRD42022366920. RESULTS: Following eligibility screening, eleven studies met inclusion criteria and were selected for our review. Six of eight studies which examined between group differences in specific domains suggested impaired cognition in the Post COVID Syndrome population, with the domains of executive function particularly affected. Of the eleven studies with immune data, nine studies reported increased markers of inflammation in the Post COVID Syndrome group, when compared to an age and gender matched "healthy control" sample, or population norms. Finally, when immune function and cognition are examined together, six studies presented results indicating a significant association between elevated immune response and cognitive function. CONCLUSION: This review highlights the frequency of cognitive difficulties months after COVID-19 infection and explores heighted immune response as a predictor of this change. Six studies suggest that immune status is a predictor of cognitive function, examining a marker of immune function and objective cognitive performance at 12 or more weeks following infection. Future studies of cognitive function in Post COVID Syndrome are needed to explore this relationship, and underlying mechanisms leading to changes in cognitive performance.
RESUMEN
Background: Long COVID is a serious, complex condition that has affected the lives of millions of people globally. Complementary and integrative health (CIH) approaches offer a wide range of potential therapies for the management of long COVID symptoms. However, there is limited information available about the utilization of CIH among long COVID patients. Methods: Nationally representative cross-sectional data from the United States 2022 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS, response rate 47.7%, n = 27,651) were used to investigate prevalence and predictors of CIH use in the past 12 months among individuals who experienced long COVID. The 12-month prevalence of CIH use was descriptively analyzed for those with long COVID versus those without using chi-squared tests or unpaired t-tests. Independent predictors of CIH use among individuals with long COVID were analyzed using a stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis. Results: A weighted total of 17,610,801 US adults (19.7%) who had a confirmed case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) developed long COVID symptoms. A slightly greater proportion of individuals with long COVID (44.4%) than those without (40.9%) used CIH approaches in the past 12 months. The most used approaches were meditation, yoga, and massage therapy. CIH use by those with long COVID was significantly associated with younger age, female sex, higher education level, having health insurance coverage, higher household income level, receiving three or more COVID-19 vaccination doses, ever having asthma, and ever having an anxiety or depression diagnosis. Conclusions: Long COVID represents a major challenge for patients, health care providers, health care systems, economies, and global public health. CIH approaches may play an important role in symptom management for some patients, and additional research is needed to identify which modalities are most effective. Patients and health care providers may benefit from better information about the available options for treatment.
RESUMEN
Background: This study aims to establish cutoff values for the one-minute sit-to-stand test (1STST) to predict physical performance in mild-post- coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) individuals and to compare the 1STST with the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) in assessing hemodynamic response and to explore the correlation between 1STST, 6MWT, and muscle strength, including leg and respiratory muscle strength. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 93 participants with mild post-COVID-19 symptoms was conducted. Sociodemographic and anthropometric data were collected, and pulmonary function, as well as respiratory and quadriceps muscle strength, were evaluated. Functional capacity was assessed using the 6MWT and 1STST. Additionally, hemodynamic responses, fatigue, and dyspnea were measured before and after each test. Results: The cutoff for the 1STST in mild post-COVID-19 individuals was ≥29 repetitions, with an AUC of 0.84, sensitivity of 80.52%, and specificity of 75.00%. The 1STST resulted in higher heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and dyspnea compared to the 6MWT, and showed a significant moderate correlation with the 6MWT (r = 0.532, p < 0.0001) and weak correlations with leg strength and respiratory muscle strength. Conclusion: A cutoff of less than 29 repetitions on the 1STST indicates functional impairment in mild post-COVID-19 cases, as it induces greater physiological stress than the 6MWT and correlates with muscle strength, making it crucial for rehabilitation assessment.
RESUMEN
Olfactory dysfunction has emerged as a prominent symptom of COVID-19, persisting in a subset of patients even after recovery. This scoping review aims to explore the potential of intranasal insulin as a treatment modality for persistent post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to gather relevant studies examining the role of intranasal insulin in treating olfactory dysfunction, particularly in post-COVID-19 cases. Studies were included investigating intranasal insulin's mechanisms, efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes. The review synthesizes findings from various studies suggesting the therapeutic potential of intranasal insulin in improving olfactory function. Research highlights the influence of intranasal insulin on neuroprotection, neurogenesis, and synaptic plasticity within the olfactory system, providing insights into its mechanisms of action. Furthermore, preliminary clinical evidence suggests improvements in olfactory sensitivity and intensity following intranasal insulin administration in post-COVID-19 patients with persistent olfactory dysfunction. While initial findings are encouraging, further rigorous investigations, including clinical trials with larger cohorts, are essential to validate these observations, ascertain optimal dosage regimens, and establish the safety and efficacy of intranasal insulin. This review provides a foundation for future research directions aimed at harnessing the therapeutic potential of intranasal insulin in addressing olfactory dysfunction following COVID-19.
RESUMEN
Pulau Kapas is tropical island which dominantly depends on land-supplied and groundwater for freshwater sources. The groundwater quality was monitored monthly, to identify the possible factors effecting the groundwater quality throughout May to October 2022. Physico-chemical parameters were in-situ measured and groundwater were collected for nutrients analysis in the laboratory. The concentration of ammonium, phosphate, nitrite, and nitrate were in the range of 0.07-1.08 mg/L, 0.00-0.06 mg/L, BDL-18 × 10-4 mg/L and 0.01-0.19 mg/L, respectively. The cluster and principal component analysis unveiled the seawater intrusion for freshwater needs was the dominant factor affecting the groundwater. Followed by the dissolution of soil particles surrounds the groundwater table, and the surface run-off by rainfall. In conclusion, the groundwater was affected by geogenic factors as it was not extensively extracted due to movement control order of Covid-19 event. This has provided significant insight for a better management plan in sustaining the groundwater of Pulau Kapas.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The long-term respiratory sequelae of COVID-19 infection in children remain poorly understood and may differ across countries. This study aims to investigate the respiratory sequelae, including residual respiratory symptoms and pulmonary function in Thai children. The secondary aim is to identify factors associated with the respiratory sequelae. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is an observational study involving 56 healthy children, aged between 7 and 18 years, who were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection from July 2021 to February 2023. Clinical data relating to COVID-19 infection and persistent symptoms after the infection were assessed after the infection up to 6 months. Spirometry was performed to assess pulmonary function. RESULTS: Post-COVID-19 symptoms were identified in 14 patients (25%), with fatigue, cough, and dyspnea being common symptoms (28%-35%). A significant correlation was found between post COVID-19 symptoms and pneumonia (OR = 6.00, 95%CI [1.54,23.33], p = .01). Abnormal pulmonary function was identified in 10 patients (17.8%) with obstructive impairment being the most common. However, there was no significant association between clinical factors and pulmonary function impairment. CONCLUSION: Prolonged respiratory symptoms and abnormal pulmonary function following COVID-19 infection are not uncommon in children. The post-COVID-19 symptoms are possibly associated with COVID-19 pneumonia.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Depressive symptoms may overlap with those of long COVID. This cross-sectional study aims to compare the prevalence of depressive symptoms among individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 with versus without long COVID and to explore specific associations with each of the nine core symptoms of major depression. METHODS: Data regarding age, gender, SARS-CoV-2 infections, current symptoms, their date of onset, impact on daily functioning, and consideration of alternative diagnoses were collected through phone interviews between September and December 2022 in a nationally representative sample of adults aged ≥18. Data on chronic health conditions and depressive symptoms (PHQ-9) were collected online in infected participants with or without long COVID, according to the WHO definition of the post-COVID-19 condition. RESULTS: Among 1247 participants (mean age (SD): 48.3 (14.3) years, 53.3 % of women), 12.8 % had long COVID and 87.2 % experienced SARS-CoV-2 infection at least 3 months prior to the survey without long COVID. Participant with long COVID were four-fold more likely to have a PHQ-9 score ≥ 10 than those without (44.0 % versus 11.1 %). Three symptoms out of nine were independently associated with long COVID: little interest or pleasure (aOR [95 % CI]: 2.01 [1.03-3.92]), feeling tired or having little energy (1.92 [1.10-3.33]), and poor attention/concentration (2.02 [1.03-3.96]). CONCLUSION: Clinicians should screen patients with long COVID for major depression but associations with specific depressive symptoms suggest some clinical overlap. Future studies should consider the course of each depressive symptom separately and focus on those less prone to overlap with symptoms of long COVID.
RESUMEN
Purpose: COVID-19 viral infection results in dysregulation of the complement system and a decrease in cortisol and adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH) levels. This study aimed to explore the complement system, as well as cortisol and ACTH responses in patients with post-COVID-19 conditions (PCC) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Patients and Methods: This study recruited 31 patients with PCC and T2DM (PCC-T2DM), 19 patients with PCC (PCC), 10 patients with T2DM (T2DM), and 10 healthy participants (control). Cortisol and ACTH in the PCC and PCC-T2DM groups were assessed using the insulin tolerance test. In the fasting state, serum samples were collected for proteomic analyses. Spearman correlation analysis was performed between proteins and cortisol, as well as between proteins and ACTH. Results: Cortisol and ACTH levels were consistently decreased in the PCC and PCC-T2DM groups. Proteomic analyses revealed that most of the differentially abundant proteins (DAPs) in the PCC vs control and PCC-T2DM vs T2DM were involved in the coagulation and complement cascade, and the essential complement C3 was significantly upregulated in the PCC and PCC-T2DM groups when compared to their controls. Additionally, complement-related DAPs in the PCC vs control and PCC-T2DM vs T2DM were significantly correlated with cortisol and ACTH levels. In comparing PCC-T2DM samples with PCC samples, we found that upregulated DAPs were linked to the complement system and other immune system, and most DAPs were negatively correlated with cortisol and ACTH. Conclusion: Our study revealed that T2DM exacerbated dysregulation of the complement system in patients with PCC, and significant correlations were present between complement protein levels and those of cortisol and ACTH. These results provide novel insights into the dysregulation of complement and endocrine hormones in patients with PCC and T2DM.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify the prevalence, risk factors, and impact of long COVID in a community-based representative sample of patients with COVID-19 aged 19-64 years. METHODS: A total of 975 participants completed online or telephone surveys at 1 and 3 months post-diagnosis, covering persistent symptoms, daily activity limitations, vaccination status, and underlying diseases. RESULTS: Long COVID, as defined by the WHO criteria, had a prevalence of 19.7-24.9% in females and 12.7% in males. Logistic regression revealed that the odds of having long COVID symptoms were higher among females compared to males (OR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.53-3.87), and higher in those aged ≥ 30 years compared to those aged 19-29 years: 30-39 years (OR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.59-5.33), 40-49 years (OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.51-4.89), and 50-64 years (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.10-3.49). Additionally, patients with underlying diseases had higher odds of long COVID symptoms compared to those without underlying diseases (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.24-2.64). Among those with long COVID, 54.2% experienced daily activity limitations, and 40.6% received treatment. Furthermore, lower income groups faced greater daily activity limitations but had similar treatment rates to higher income groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings emphasize the need for interest in and the development of programs to support these low-income populations.
RESUMEN
For most individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2, the acute illness resolves completely. However, for millions of people, symptoms or sequelae from COVID-19 recur or persist for months to years after infection. Post-COVID-19 sequelae are wide-ranging, often affecting the musculoskeletal, pulmonary, and cardiovascular systems. All who experience post-COVID-19 sequelae face significant challenges navigating home and work life. Occupations such as firefighting, however, are of particular concern given the strenuous nature of a job that relies on a healthy musculoskeletal, pulmonary, and cardiovascular system. Research has documented significant musculoskeletal impairment (including muscle weakness, pain, and fatigue), respiratory dysfunction (including reduced lung function, interstitial disease, and diffusion abnormalities), cardiovascular conditions (including cardiac events, ischemic disease, dysrhythmias, and infectious diseases), and diminished cardiorespiratory fitness that continues for months to years in some individuals. These persistent post-COVID-19 conditions may affect a firefighter's ability to return to work, function at full capacity while at work, and potentially compromise firefighter health and public safety. This review, therefore, explores musculoskeletal, pulmonary, and cardiovascular sequelae post-COVID-19 and the impact of these sequelae on firefighter health and occupational readiness.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Bomberos , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , Salud Laboral , SARS-CoV-2 , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/etiología , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/virología , Enfermedades Pulmonares/etiología , Enfermedades Pulmonares/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Pulmonares/virologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although considerable research has been conducted on post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS), cognitive symptoms, particularly those related to language, are still not well understood. AIMS: To provide a detailed quantitative and qualitative analysis of language performance in PCS patients using a comprehensive set of semantic and verbal production tasks. METHODS & PROCEDURES: The study involved 195 PCS patients aged 26-64 years and 50 healthy controls aged 25-61 years. Participants were assessed using two semantic tasks, three naming tasks and four types of verbal fluency tasks, designed to evaluate different aspects of language processing. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: PCS patients demonstrated significantly poorer performance compared with controls across all verbal fluency tasks. This was evident in both the total number of words generated and their types, with patients tending to choose more easily accessible words. In naming tasks, the pattern of errors was similar in both groups, although patients showed a higher number of non-responses and made more errors, reflecting difficulties in word retrieval. The analysis highlighted the impact of factors such as stimulus availability, educational level and cognitive reserve on performance. Notably, younger patients performed worse than older, a paradoxical trend also observed in previous research. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: These findings reveal significant word retrieval difficulties in PCS patients, suggesting that cognitive impairment related to language may be more pronounced than previously understood. The results underscore the need for a thorough evaluation of language functions in PCS patients and the development of more targeted and individualized language rehabilitation strategies to address these specific challenges. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on the subject Studies on the cognitive characteristics of CPS have focused mainly on broad-spectrum neuropsychological assessments covering all cognitive functions. However, there are very few studies analysing oral production with specific lexical and semantic system tasks. Furthermore, no work has specifically included tasks assessing semantic processing or conducted qualitative analyses of the psycholinguistic variables affecting performance. Such analyses could undoubtedly help clarify the nature of the language impairments in patients with PCS. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge This study explores in depth the evaluation and analysis of the oral production of patients with PCS using several lexical and semantic tasks. In addition, psycholinguistic variables are analysed that could undoubtedly help clarify the nature of the language impairments in patients with PCS. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The study allows the identification of specific lexical-semantic deficits in the spoken language in patients with this PCS. A more detailed assessment of the oral language of these patients, keeping in mind the psycholinguistic variables that may affect the performance, will facilitate the design of more efficient and individualized rehabilitation programmes.
RESUMEN
Objective: To follow up patients with post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) 6 months after a multidisciplinary team assessment in specialist care regarding symptoms of pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue and cognition, level of activity, physical activity and sick leave. Methods: A prospective pilot study conducted in a clinical setting of patients (n = 22) with PCC referred from primary healthcare to a specialist clinic for a 2 day-multidisciplinary team assessment followed by a subsequent rehabilitation plan. Data were collected through questionnaires filled in prior to the team assessment and 6 months later. Results: Fifteen of the initial 22 patients participated in the follow-up. No statistically significant improvements were seen in any of the questionnaires after 6 months. However, 76.9% of the participants perceived the intervention as being helpful. This differed between the genders, where all the women 100% (n = 8) perceived it as being helpful, compared with 40% (n = 2) of the men (p = 0.012). Conclusions: Based on these findings, the benefit of a multidisciplinary team assessment of PCC is not fully convincing. However, since the participants themselves perceived the intervention as being helpful, the team assessment seems to be of some value. Further studies with larger populations would be of interest.
Most people who become ill with COVID-19 experience mild symptoms and recover within days or weeks. However, minor symptoms last from weeks to months and include fatigue, attention disorder, headache, dyspnea, anxiety, pain, anosmia, etc. This clinical state has been denoted as "post-COVID-19 condition" (PCC). It has been recommended that complex cases of PCC are to be assessed by a multidisciplinary team regarding treatment and rehabilitation. The efficiency of this recommendation has not yet been proven. This pilot study aimed to follow up patients with PCC six months after a multidisciplinary team assessment in specialist care regarding symptoms of pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue and cognition, level of activity, physical activity and sick leave through questionnaires. The results showed no statistically significant improvements in any of the questionnaires after six months. The majority of the participants perceived the team assessment as being helpful. Since the assessment seemed to be of some value, there is a need for further studies with larger populations.
RESUMEN
Background: Women are more at risk for developing long-term symptoms after a COVID-19 infection. Only limited data are available for patients with coexisting endometriosis and/or menstrual pain symptoms. Study Design: A total of 840 premenopausal women with menstrual pain and/or endometriosis were included in this observational cross-sectional study using an online survey platform. Results: A total of 840 women with menstrual pain (mean age 30.7 ± 6.9, 15-54 years) were studied. Of these, 714 (84.2%) had a COVID-19 infection, 123 did not (14.5%). A total of 312 subjects had acute COVID-19 (AC) with symptoms ≤4 weeks (43.7%), 132 (18.5%) developed postacute COVID-19 syndrome (PC), and 88 (12.3%) had "long Covid" (LC). There were no statistical differences regarding number of vaccination shots between the three groups AC, PC, and LC. A total of 582 patients with surgically confirmed endometriosis (SCE) showed a twofold increased risk of LC [odds ratio (OR): 2.12, 2.18-3.84] in comparison with AC subjects. In SCE the comorbidity anxiety disorder (OR: 2.08, 1.14-3.81) and depression (OR: 2.02, 1.15-3.56) further increased the risk of LC. LC subjects had a significantly higher disturbance level of menstrual pain (p = 0.002), were more restricted in job (p < 0.001), leisure (p = 0.002), and family activities (p < 0.001), and had a higher number of endometriosis surgeries (p = 0.003). Conclusion: Subjects with SCE had a twofold increased risk of LC (in comparison to subjects with nonconfirmed endometriosis menstrual pain). In patients with SCE concomitant diagnosis of depression or anxiety disorder further twice-fold increased risk of LC. Further studies are needed if it is possible to reduce LC risk by improving the treatment of those secondary diagnoses and whether the type of endometriosis treatment can reduce LC occurrence (holistic, coanalgetic, hormonal).
RESUMEN
This report presents the case of a 61-year-old male patient with diabetes, hypertension, and a history of severe COVID-19 with osteomyelitis of the frontal sinus and upper jaw. The patient reported intense pain in the facial and maxillary area for two months. The computed tomography images showed mucoperiosteal thickening of the maxillary sinus and the magnetic resonance imaging showed multiple lytic lesions at the frontal sinus level, as well as brain abscesses in the left frontal region that were correlated with the microbiological cultures. In the intraoral clinical examination, segments with a necrotic appearance of the upper jaw, orosinusal fistula and multiple dental infectious foci were observed. The patient was treated with antibiotics, analgesics, anti-inflammatories, insulin, and proton pump inhibitor. Trephination of the frontal sinus, drainage of the abscess and sequestrectomy in the maxilla were performed and sessions with a hyperbaric chamber were ordered.
RESUMEN
We present a narrative review of clinical trials investigating the anxiolytic and antidepressant effects of silexan, an active substance derived from lavender oil and summarize nonclinical findings from pharmacological studies supporting its therapeutic use. Six studies investigated the efficacy of the lavender oil in patients with subthreshold and generalized anxiety disorders as well as in mixed anxiety and depressive disorder (MADD). Furthermore, we present data indicating that silexan may influence sleep quality as well as anxiety or depressive disorders in individuals with post-COVID-19. Silexan taken orally at a daily dose of 80 mg for 10 weeks was significantly superior to placebo in reducing psychic and somatic symptoms of anxiety and was as effective as 0.5 mg/d lorazepam and 20 mg/d paroxetine. In patients with mild or moderate major depression, silexan was superior to placebo and comparably effective to 50 mg/d sertraline. Significant antidepressant effects were also observed in MADD and depression co-morbid with anxiety. The herbal product had a beneficial effect on activities of daily living and health-related quality of life. Adverse events associated with silexan in clinical trials were limited to eructation and mild, transient gastrointestinal complaints. The herbal product was not associated with drug interactions, sedation, sleep disturbance, dependence and abuse potential, sexual dysfunction, weight gain or withdrawal symptoms. Silexan was therefore safe and effective in subthreshold and syndromal anxiety disorders and in major depression.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: More than 200 symptoms of post coronavirus disease (COVID-19) condition (PCC) impacting patients' quality of life have been reported. This study describes the symptoms of well-known PCC and diseases/conditions diagnosed after COVID-19 and analyzes the trends in well-known PCC according to the epidemic waves in the Japanese population. METHODS: Patients with a COVID-19 diagnosis in the JMDC claims database were matched 1:1 with individuals without COVID-19 diagnosis (controls) based on sex, year and month of birth, and risk factors for aggravation. The first month of COVID-19 diagnosis from January 2020-March 2022 was the index month, and the observation period was from July 2019 to 6 months from the index month (patients) and July 2019-September 2022 (controls). RESULTS: Of 263,456 each of patients and controls after matching, 51.8 % were aged 18-49 years, 56.3 % were male, and 24.5 % had risk factors for aggravation. One in 18 patients experienced well-known PCC 2-3 months after severe acute respiratory syndrome cornonavirus 2 infection, with the highest odds ratio (OR) being for pulmonary thromboembolism (29.37), followed by smell/taste disorder (13.34) and respiratory failure (8.28). Some of the common diseases/conditions diagnosed after COVID-19 comprised those of the genitourinary system, eye and adnexa, and ear and mastoid process and certain infectious and parasitic diseases. Overall, the risk difference decreased from the first to the sixth wave, but the OR was >1.00 for most symptoms even during the sixth wave. CONCLUSIONS: PCC symptoms showed a declining trend over time but persisted. Physicians and patients need to recognize PCC symptoms.