Clinical impact of postoperative radiotherapy in pIII-N2 non-small cell lung cancer after complete resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Theoretically, postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) could reduce the risk of local recurrence and further improve survival outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of PORT on patients with pIII-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after complete resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in November 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare PORT with observation in patients with pIII-N2 NSCLC using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. This meta-analysis is in accordance with the recommendations of the PRISMA statement. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local recurrence rates, which were compared using hazard ratios (HRs). Results: Five RCTs involving 1,138 patients were included: 572 patients in the PORT group and 566 patients in the observation group. The methodological quality of the five RCTs was high. Pooled analysis revealed that PORT decreased local recurrence rate [odds ratio =0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.40-0.70]. However, PORT did not improve median DFS (HR =0.93, 95% CI: 0.80-1.08) and OS (HR =0.94, 95% CI: 0.78-1.14). Conclusions: Compared to adjuvant chemotherapy alone, additional PORT was significantly associated with a reduced local recurrence rate. However, neither DFS nor OS benefited from PORT in patients with pIII-N2 NSCLC who had undergone complete resection.

Is postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) a viable option in high-risk early-stage cervical cancer after upfront or downstaged radical surgery? A comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Radical surgery for cervical cancer has inherent benefits, and as upfront or post neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), is extendable to locally advanced cancer cervix (LACC), with postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for high-risk factors. Objective of the study was to compare the effectiveness and survival between non-PORT and PORT in high-risk early stages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radical hysterectomies conducted between January 2014 and December 2017 were evaluated and followed till December 2019. Clinical, surgical-pathologic characteristics, and oncological outcomes were compared between non-PORT and PORT groups. A similar comparison was made between alive and dead patients within each group. The impact of PORT was assessed. RESULTS: Of 178 radical surgeries, early-LACC constituted 70%. Most (37%) of the patients belonged to stage 1b2, while stage 2b formed 5%. Mean age of patients was 46.5 years; 69% were below 50 years of age. Abnormal bleeding (41%) was the predominant symptom, followed by postcoital (20%) and postmenopausal bleeding (12%). Upfront surgeries formed 70.2%, and the average waiting period was 1.93 months (range: 1-10 months). PORT patients were 97 (54.5%) in number and the remaining formed the non-PORT group. Mean follow-up was 34 months, with 118 (66%) alive patients. Significant adverse prognostic factors were tumors >4 cm (44.4% patients), positive margins (10%), lymphatic vascular space invasion (LVSI; 42%), malignant nodes (33%), multiple metastatic nodes averaging seven (range: 3-11), and delayed (>6 months) presentation, but not deep stromal invasion (77% patients) and positive parametrium (8.4% patients). PORT overcame the adverse effects of tumors >4 cm, multiple metastatic nodes, positive margins, and LVSI. Total recurrences (25%) were balanced for both groups, but recurrences within 2 years were significantly more for PORT. Two-year overall survival (78%) and recurrence-free survival (72%), median overall survival (21 months), and median recurrence-free interval (19 months) were significantly better for PORT, with the complication rates being similar. CONCLUSION: PORT had significantly better oncological outcomes compared to non-PORT. Multimodal management is worthwhile.

Long-term follow-up results of spine tumor treatment using high-dose radiotherapy after 3-dimensional-printed vertebral bodies implantation.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long-term safety and efficacy of high-dose radiotherapy after 3D-printed vertebral body implantation in the treatment of spinal tumors. METHODS: Thirty-three participants were recruited between July 2017 and August 2019. 3D-printed vertebral bodies were implanted in each participant, followed by postoperative robotic stereotactic radiosurgery at a dose of 35-40 Gy/5f. The tolerance of the 3D-printed vertebral body and the participant to the high-dose radiotherapy were evaluated. In addition, the local control of tumor and the local progression-free survival of the study participants following 3D-printed vertebral body implantation and high-dose radiotherapy were measured as indexes of effectiveness. RESULTS: Of the 33 participants included in the study, 30, including three participants (10%) with esophagitis of grade 3 or above and two participants (6.7%) with advanced radiation nerve injury, successfully underwent postoperative high-dose radiotherapy. The median follow-up was 26.7 months, and IQR was 15.9 months. Most participants had primary bone tumors with 27 cases (81.8%), and the rest had bone metastases in six cases (18.2%). After high-dose radiotherapy, the 3D-printed vertebrae maintained good vertebral stability and exhibited histocompatibility, without implant fractures. The local control rates were 100%, 88%, and 85% 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after high-dose radiotherapy, respectively. Tumors recurred in four participants (12.1%) during the follow-up period. The median local progression-free survival after treatment was 25.7 months, with a range of 9.6-33.0 months. CONCLUSION: High-dose radiotherapy for spinal tumors after 3D-printed vertebral body implantation is feasible, elicits low toxicity, and yields satisfactory tumor control.

The association of postoperative radiotherapy with survival in resected N2 non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: The current staging system for completely resected pathologic N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with chemotherapy is not suitable for distinguishing those patients most likely to benefit from postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). This study aimed to construct a survival prediction model that will enable individualized prediction of the net survival benefit of PORT in patients with completely resected N2 NSCLC treated with chemotherapy. Methods: A total of 3,094 cases from between 2002 and 2014 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patient characteristics were included as covariates, and their association with overall survival (OS) with and without PORT was assessed. Data from 602 patients from China were included for external validation. Results: Age, sex, the number of examined/positive lymph nodes, tumor size, the extent of surgery, and visceral pleural invasion (VPI) were significantly associated with OS (P<0.05). Two nomograms were developed based on clinical variables to estimate individuals' net survival difference attributable to PORT. The calibration curve showed excellent agreement between the OS predicted by the prediction model and that actually observed. In the training cohort, the C-index for OS was 0.619 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.598-0.641] in the PORT group and 0.627 (95% CI: 0.605-0.648) in the non-PORT group. Results showed that PORT could improve OS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.861; P=0.044] for patients with a positive PORT net survival difference. Conclusions: Our practical survival prediction model can be used to make an individualized estimate of the net survival benefit of PORT for patients with completely resected N2 NSCLC who have been treated with chemotherapy.

Value of postoperative radiotherapy for stage IIIa-N2 non-small cell lung cancer: an analysis based on SEER database.

Background: The role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in resected stage IIIa-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who have received adjuvant chemotherapy remains controversial. This study aimed to explore the value of PORT and determine which patients could benefit from PORT. Methods: Stage IIIa-N2 NSCLC patients treated with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) databases from 2004 to 2015. Eligible patients were divided into the following two groups: PORT group and non-PORT group. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method, and differences in survival were evaluated with log-rank test. Long-term cause-specific mortality consisted of lung cancer-related mortality and non-lung cancer-related mortality was investigated through competing risk analysis. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify variables that significantly affected OS. Results: We identified 2,347 eligible patients, after propensity score matching (PSM), 877 pairs were selected. Overall, there was no significant difference in OS between two groups, but the patients who received PORT had a lower lung cancer-related mortality rate. Subgroup analysis showed that PORT was associated with a significantly better OS and lower lung cancer-related mortality rate in patients with T2, grade I-II and positive/resected lymph node ratio (LNR) ≥0.31. The non-lung cancer-related mortality of PORT group was higher in the patients with squamous cell carcinoma, although the difference was not significant. The independent prognostic factors for OS were age, sex, grade, histology, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T stage and LNR. Conclusions: Our results revealed that PORT appears to be the optimal treatment strategy in patients with AJCC T2, grade I-II and LNR ≥0.31. PORT may not be recommended for patients with squamous cell carcinoma.

Preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy (RT) for non-small cell lung cancer: still an open question.

Preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) with or without chemotherapy has been used in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for decades. Numerous trials have investigated the potential survival benefit of this strategy, but despite greater knowledge of the disease, considerable technological developments in imaging and radiotherapy, and significant progress in surgery, many questions remain unsolved. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on this problem and discuss issues which still require elucidation.

Radiotherapy for thymic epithelial tumours: a review.

Thymic epithelial tumours (TETs) represent a rare disease, yet they are the most common tumours of the anterior mediastinum. Due to the rare occurrence of TETs, evidence on optimal treatment is limited. Surgery is the treatment of choice in the management of TETs, while the role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) remains unresolved. PORT remains debated for thymomas, especially in completely resected stage II tumours, for which PORT may be more likely to benefit in the presence of aggressive histology (WHO subtype B2, B3) or extensive transcapsular invasion (Masaoka-Koga stage IIB). For stage III thymoma, evidence suggests an overall survival (OS) benefit for PORT after complete resection. For incompletely resected thymomas stage II or higher PORT is recommended. Thymic carcinomas at any stage with positive resection margins should be offered PORT. Radiotherapy plays an important role in the management of unresectable locally advanced TETs. Induction therapy (chemotherapy or chemoradiation) followed by surgery may be useful for locally advanced thymic malignancies initially considered as unresectable. Chemotherapy only is offered in patients with unresectable, metastatic tumours in palliative intent, checkpoint inhibitors may be promising for refractory diseases. Due to the lack of high-level evidence and the importance of a multidisciplinary approach, TETs should be discussed within a multidisciplinary team and the final recommendation should reflect individual patient preferences.

The role of postoperative radiotherapy in stage II and III thymoma: a Korean multicenter database study.

BACKGROUND: Complete resection is a standard treatment for patients with Masaoka-Koga stages II and III thymoma, however the role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is controversial. We analyzed data collected from 4 Korean hospitals to determine the effectiveness of PORT in stage II and III thymoma patients. METHODS: Between January 2000 and December 2013, 1,663 patients underwent surgery for thymic tumors at the 4 hospitals. Among them, 668 patients (527 with stage II and 141 with stage III) were investigated, among whom, 443 received PORT (335 with stage II and 108 with stage III). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed, and 404 patients (346 with stage II and 58 with stage III) were selected. RESULTS: Perioperative characteristics were similar in the PORT and non-PORT groups after PSM. On survival analysis of stage II patients, the PORT and non-PORT groups showed no difference in either 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) (96.3% vs. 96.6%, P=0.622) or 5-year overall survival (OS) (94.6% vs. 93.8%, P=0.839). However, among stage III patients, the PORT group showed significantly better 5-year RFS (75.7% vs. 50.1%, P=0.040) and 5-year OS (86.5% vs. 54.7%, P=0.001). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, PORT was a significant positive prognostic factor in terms of both RFS (P=0.005) and OS (P=0.004) in patients with stage III thymomas, but not in those with stage II disease (P=0.987 and 0.968, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: PORT improved the RFS and OS in stage III thymoma patients, but showed no survival benefit in stage II patients.

The role of postoperative radiotherapy for thymomas: a multicentric retrospective evaluation from three Italian centers and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Thymoma is a rare mediastinal neoplasia. Surgery is the backbone of the treatment, but the role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) remains controversial. We aimed to obtain data on survival and safety in patients treated with PORT in three different Italian institutions. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 183 consecutive patients who underwent surgery from 1981 to 2015. According to the Masaoka-Koga staging system, 39.3%, 32.7%, 18.6% and 9.8% patients were in stage I, II, III and IV of disease, respectively. PORT was indicated in 114 patients (62.3%), while 69 subjects underwent surgery alone. Complete resection was obtained in 68 patients who underwent PORT. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to CTCAE v4.0. We analyzed the recent literature to describe the current reports on PORT for resected thymoma. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 130 months (range, 3-417 months). Overall survival (OS) at 1-, 5- and 10-year from surgery was 98.3%, 90.2% and 69.7% respectively. One-, 5- and 10-year disease specific survival (DSS) was 98.9%, 92.3% and 89.8% respectively. Disease free survival (DFS) at 1, 5 and 10 years from surgery was 96.7%, 88.3% and 82.8% respectively. Univariate analysis showed that complete resection, cell histology A-AB-B1 and stages I-II were significant predictors of better DSS and DFS. Multivariate analysis showed that sex, R0 margins and WHO histology was independent prognostic factors. Among patients treated with PORT, a trend towards better OS was evident with Masaoka stage I-II (P=0.09). Patients with R0 margins treated with PORT showed better OS and DSS (P=0.05). No differences in DSS for performance status (P=0.70), WHO histology (P=0.19), paraneoplastic syndrome (P=0.23) and surgical procedure (P=0.53) were evident. Patients treated with PORT had a higher level of acute AEs compared to surgery alone, but none of these was graded ≥3. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirmed that patients with incompletely resected thymoma had the worst OS and DSS. High grade acute toxicity was not different between PORT and surgery alone. Other trials reported a significant benefit in OS, DSS and DFS in stage IIb-IV thymoma treated with PORT.

The lymph node status and histologic subtypes influenced the effect of postoperative radiotherapy on patients with N2 positive IIIA non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and subgroups which derived benefit from PORT. METHODS: A total of 576 patients with pathological IIIA-N2 NSCLC, who underwent complete resection, were identified. Propensity score matching (PSM) methods were used to balance the patients' characteristics between two groups. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were compared between PORT and non-PORT patients. RESULTS: On multivariable analysis, improved OS remained correlated with younger age, single N2 station involvement, less positive lymph nodes, and chemotherapy. After PSM, 121 PROT patients and 242 non-PORT patients were matched. PORT was not associated improved patients' OS (P = 0.735) or RFS ( P = 0.483). For patients who underwent postoperative chemotherapy (POCT), PORT could improve OS in single N2 station involved patients (HR: 0.572, 95%CI: 0.312 to 1.05, P = 0.040). Patients with papillary predominant adenocarcinoma also benefited from PORT with an increase in OS (HR: 0.350, 95%CI: 0.126 to 0.972, P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with completely resected IIIA-N2 NSCLC, mediastinal lymph node metastasis and histologic subtypes could influence the effect of PORT. Single N2 station involvement and papillary predominant subtype were predictors of benefit from PORT.

The role of postoperative radiotherapy for radically resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for radical resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains controversial. This meta-analysis aims to determine whether PORT achieves survival benefit compared with surgery alone (S alone) for radically resected ESCC. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant articles. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), reported as hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Six randomized trials and 13 retrospective studies that included a total of 8,198 patients were eligible. PORT provided significant OS benefit compared with S alone in retrospective studies (HR =0.75, 95% CI: 0.65-0.85), but not in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (HR =0.94, 95% CI: 0.81-1.09). PORT was associated with significantly improved DFS and obvious reduction in the risk of locoregional recurrence compared to S alone in either retrospective studies or RCTs. In the subgroup analysis for retrospective studies, PORT gained superior OS in patients with lymph node-positive (pN+), patients with lymph node-negative (pN0) or pT2-3N0, PORT with three-dimensional radiotherapy (3D-RT), PORT with chemotherapy, and patients with R0 resection, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that PORT can improve DFS and decrease risk of locoregional recurrence in patients with radically resected ESCC, and PORT using 3D-RT or in combination with chemotherapy is likely to be more useful. Further well-designed, prospective studies are needed to confirm the effect of PORT on OS.

Optimal managements of stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer patients: a population-based survival analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the optimal management of stage IIIA (cN2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and determine potential predictive factors. METHODS: We extracted patients diagnosed as NSCLC stage IIIA (cN2) between 2004 and 2011 from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) were compared among patients given different clinical managements by Kaplan-Meier method. Other variables such as age, sex and tumor size were analyzed to explore the factors associated with outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 98,700 IIIA-cN2 NSCLC patients were identified from SEER database. Survival of patients treated with surgery was better than that of patients treated by radiotherapy alone (P<0.001). Radiation prior to surgery significantly improved the survival in comparison with surgery alone (P<0.001). In the subgroups of OS analysis, age >65 (P=0.902), adenocarcinoma (P=0.279), tumor size ≤3 cm (P=0.170), well differentiated (P=0.360) patients, preoperative radiotherapy improved survival insignificantly compared with surgery alone. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative radiation with surgery had the most encouraging survival outcomes in stage IIIA-cN2 NSCLC patients compared with radiation or surgery alone. No significant outcome improvement was shown between postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) and surgery alone.

Choice of postoperative radiation for stage IIIA pathologic N2 non-small cell lung cancer: impact of metastatic lymph node number.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative radiation (PORT) is an option for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with resectable stage IIIA pathological N2 status (pN2). For patients with PORT, this study aims to investigate the impact of the exact number of positive lymph nodes (LNs) on overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS). METHODS: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we identified 3373 patients with stage IIIA pathological N2 status (pN2) NSCLC who underwent a lobectomy or pneumonectomy from 2004 to 2013. OS and LCSS were compared among patients coded as receiving PORT or observation. The proportional hazards model was applied for investigation. RESULTS: OS and LCSS favored PORT for patients with stage IIIA (pN2) NSCLC. Multivariable analyses showed that PORT and the exact number of positive LNs (n ≤ 3) were independently associated with better OS and LCSS. Both better OS and LCSS emerged for positive LNs (n > 3) after the use of PORT in survival analyses, whereas the benefits of OS and LCSS were not observed anymore for positive LNs (n ≤ 3) group. More importantly, multivariable analyses showed that the use of PORT is an independent risk factor of survival for positive LNs (n > 3) but not for positive LNs (n ≤ 3). CONCLUSIONS: In Stage IIIA (pN2) NSCLC, the use of PORT demonstrated better survival results than no PORT for patients with positive LNs (n > 3), but not for patients with positive LNs (n ≤ 3).

Benefits of postoperative thoracic radiotherapy for small cell lung cancer subdivided by lymph node stage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Whether postoperative thoracic radiotherapy (PORT) is beneficial for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) of different lymph node stages remains uncertain; therefore, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to explore the clinical significance of PORT for SCLC patients subdivided by lymph node status. METHODS: The PubMed, OVID, Web of SCI, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang databases were systematically searched to identify eligible studies where SCLC patients received PORT based on lymph node stage. The main outcome measures were 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates, as well as 1-, 2- and 3-year local regional recurrence (LRR) rates. All data were analyzed using STATA 12.0 and expressed as risk ratios (RR) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: Five cohort studies, including 3,497 SCLC patients (578 receiving PORT and 2,919 not) were included in this study. PORT significantly decreased the 1-, 2- and 3-year LRR rates (RR =0.14, 0.28 and 0.27, respectively; Pall<0.05), but did not improve the 1-, 3- or 5-year OS rates when all patients were analyzed together. However, subgroup analysis showed that in the pN0 group PORT did not improve the 1-, 3- or 5-year OS rates or decrease the 1-, 2- or 3-year LRR rates; in the pN1 group PORT reduced the 1-, 2- and 3-year LRR rates (RR =0.11, 0.16 and 0.17, respectively; Pall<0.05) and improved the 1-year OS rate (RR =0.40; P<0.001), but not the 3- or 5-year OS rates; in the pN2 group PORT significantly reduced the 1-, 2- and 3-year LRR rates (RR =0.14, 0.15 and 0.15 respectively; Pall<0.05) and improved the 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates (RR =0.46, 0.72 and 0.85, respectively; Pall<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first meta-analysis of the benefits of PORT for SCLC patients. Although derived from retrospective cohort studies, the data showed that PORT significantly reduced the risk of recurrence and improved survival for patients with pN2-SCLC; however, patients with pN0-SCLC did not benefit from PORT, whereas for patients with pN1-SCLC, PORT reduced the LRR rates and improved the 1-year survival rate. The long-term survival benefits of PORT remain unclear and will require further prospective studies.

Sequencing postoperative radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: unanswered questions on the not evidence-based approach.

This editorial comments on the study by Lee et al. which reported on the use of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) as first strategy after resection of stage IIIA-pN2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). After completion of PORT, 41% of patients received postoperative chemotherapy (POCT). The five-year overall survival (OS) was significantly higher in patients treated with PORT and POCT than in patients treated with PORT alone. Authors concluded that PORT used as first postoperative strategy does not compromise a benefit of POCT and its implementation should be further studied. We discuss the pros and cons of using PORT before POCT for stage IIIA-pN2 NSCLC. Some radiobiological data support earlier use of PORT, however, caution should be paid to not to unnecessarily delay or omit POCT because of its demonstrated survival benefit. Concurrent postoperative radio-chemotherapy could be an attractive approach, but we still have very limited clinical data on its use in this indication.

The role of postoperative radiotherapy for stage I/II/III thymic tumor-results of the ChART retrospective database.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for thymic tumor is still controversial. The object of the study is to evaluate the role of PORT for stage I to III thymic tumors. METHODS: The Chinese Alliance for Research in Thymomas (ChART) was searched for patients with stage I to III thymic tumors who underwent surgical resection without neoajuvant therapy between 1994 and 2012. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed. Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine the hazard ratio for death. RESULT: From the ChART database, 1,546 stage I to III patients were identified. Among these patients, 649 (41.98%) received PORT. PORT was associated with gender, histological type (World Health Organization, WHO), thymectomy extent, resection status, Masaoka-Koga stage and adjuvant chemotherapy. The 5-year and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates and disease-free survival (DFS) rates for patients underwent surgery followed by PORT were 90% and 80%, 81% and 63%, comparing with 96% and 95%, 92% and 90% for patients underwent surgery alone (P=0.001, P<0.001) respectively. In univariate analysis, age, histological type (WHO), Masaoka-Koga stage, completeness of resection, and PORT were associated with OS. Multivariable analysis showed that histological type (WHO) (P=0.001), Masaoka-Koga stage (P=0.029) and completeness of resection (P=0.003) were independently prognostic factors of OS. In univariate analysis, gender, myasthenia gravis, histological subtype, Masaoka-Koga stage, surgical approach, PORT and completeness of resection were associated with DFS. Multivariate analysis showed that histological subtype (P<0.001), Masaoka-Koga stage (P=0.005) and completeness of resection (P=0.006) were independent prognostic factors for DFS. Subgroup analysis showed that patients with incomplete resection underwent PORT achieved better OS and DFS (P=0.010, 0.017, respectively). However, patients with complete resection underwent PORT had the worse OS and DFS (P<0.001, P<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The current retrospective study indicates that PORT after incomplete resection could improve OS and DFS for patients with stage I to III thymic tumors. However for those after complete resection, PORT does not seem to have any survival benefit on the whole.

Clinical and pathological parameters prognostic for increased risk of recurrence after postoperative radiotherapy for temporal bone carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Most authors agree that radical surgery for advanced, aggressive temporal bone squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) should be followed by postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). The purpose of this study was to identify clinical and/or conventional pathological parameters capable of pinpointing patients with temporal bone SCC at higher risk of recurrence after PORT. METHODS: The investigation concerned 27 consecutive patients undergoing PORT for primary temporal bone SCC. RESULTS: Univariate statistics revealed a difference in the distributions for pT classification (p = .0004), pathological grade (p = .006), and dura mater involvement (p = .015) when patients were grouped by presence versus absence of recurrence after PORT. A panel of 3 parameters comprising pT classification (pT4), pathological grade (G2 or G3), and dura mater involvement demonstrated an outstanding discriminatory power (area under the curve [AUC] receiver operating characteristic [ROC] = 0.912) in predicting temporal bone SCC recurrence after PORT. CONCLUSION: The panel considered had an outstanding discriminatory power in pinpointing patients at higher risk of recurrence who could benefit from stricter follow-up protocols and postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for temporal bone SCC. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: 894-898, 2016.