The role of lipidic balance on erectile dysfunction in prostate cancer patients undergoing robotic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: New indices of dyslipidemia, such as the Atherogenic Index of Plasma (AIP) or Castelli Risk Index I and II (CR-I/II), have been tested to predict erectile dysfunction (ED). The aim of this study was to assess the role of these lipidic scores in predicting severe ED and erectile function (EF) worsening in patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS: Data from 1249 prostate cancer patients who underwent RARP at our single tertiary academic referral center from September 2021 to April 2023 were reviewed. RARP patients with a complete lipid panel were included in the final analysis. Two independent multivariable logistic regression models (LRMs) were fitted to identify predictors of ED severity and worsening in RARP patients. RESULTS: Among the 357 RARP patients, the median age was 70 (interquartile range [IQR]: 65-74), and the median BMI was 28.4 (IQR: 26-30.4). According to the preoperative IIEF5, 115 (32.2%), 86 (24.5%), 26 (7.3%), and 40 (11.2%) were mild, mild-moderate, moderate, and severe ED patients, respectively. After multivariable LRMs predicting severe ED, only the nerve-sparing (NS) approach (odds ratio [OR]: 0.09) as well as the preoperative IIEF5 score (OR: 0.32) were independent predictors (p < 0.001). After LRMs predicting EF worsening, only preoperative IIEF5 was an independent predictor (OR: 1.42, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The power of novel lipidic scores in predicting severe ED and EF worsening in RARP patients was low, and they should not be routinely applied as a screening method in this patient subgroup. Only preoperative IIEF5 and nerve-sparing approaches are relevant in EF prediction after RARP.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for treatment of a newly identified lesion revealed no viable cells in the previously treated area with microwave focal therapy.

Introduction: Histological outcome of the targeted focal therapy is in principle confirmed by targeted needle biopsy from the treated area in clinical trial. Herein, we report a rare case in which the MFT was followed by RARP. Case presentation: A 68-year-old man with PSA 9.6 ng/mL and PI-RADS 4 lesion in the right transition zone on multi-parametric MRI underwent MR/ultrasound fusion-guided targeted biopsy, which revealed grade-group 1 cancer. Targeted focal therapy with microwave ablation was performed, resulting in disappearance of the PI-RADS 4 lesion at post-operative 4 months. However, PSA rose to 11.5 ng/mL, and a new PI-RADS 4 lesion, was identified in the left peripheral zone. RARP was performed to reveal new grade-group 3 cancer, and no viable cells in the previously treated area with MFT. Conclusion: RARP was safely performed even after MFT and proved the pathological complete response of microwave ablation.

Prolonged indwelling catheter time after RARP does not lead to follow-up surgery.

BACKGROUND: Indwelling catheterization following radical prostatectomy is used to aid healing and urinary drainage. While early removal is well investigated, prolonged catheterization has only been investigated in terms of urinary incontinence. Other complications such as anastomotic strictures are unexplored so far. This study aims to analyze the sequelae of catheterization lasting more than 14 days after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS: A prospective database of 3087 patients undergoing RARP was analyzed, focusing on 180 patients with catheterization exceeding 14 days (Group A) and 88 matched controls (Group B). Outcome measures included subsequent surgeries, complications, and functional outcomes. RESULTS: Prolonged catheterization did not significantly increase the need for subsequent surgeries (6% in Group A vs. 7% in Group B, p = .95). However, anastomotic strictures were more common in Group A (3%) compared to Group B (0%) after exclusion of risk factors. Incontinence rates were similar between groups, although a subgroup analysis revealed higher incontinence rates in patients with catheterization exceeding 28 days. No significant differences were observed in erectile function or quality of life between the groups. CONCLUSION: Prolonged catheterization after RARP does not independently increase the risk of anastomotic strictures in the general population. However, in patients without risk factors, prolonged catheter dwell time may elevate the risk of strictures and subsequent surgeries. Additionally, patients with catheterization exceeding 28 days may experience higher rates of long-term incontinence. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings and elucidate the long-term implications of prolonged catheterization.

Prognostic Impact and Clinical Implications of Adverse Tumor Grade in Very Favorable Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Experience of a Single Tertiary Referral Center.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prognostic impact and predictors of adverse tumor grade in very favorable low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS: Data of low- and intermediate PCa risk-class patients were retrieved from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Adverse tumor grade was defined as pathology ISUP grade group > 2. Disease progression was defined as a biochemical recurrence event and/or local recurrence and/or distant metastases. Associations were assessed by Cox's proportional hazards and logistic regression model. RESULTS: Between January 2013 and October 2020, the study evaluated a population of 289 patients, including 178 low-risk cases (61.1%) and 111 intermediate-risk subjects (38.4%); unfavorable tumor grade was detected in 82 cases (28.4%). PCa progression, which occurred in 29 patients (10%), was independently predicted by adverse tumor grade and biopsy ISUP grade group 2, with the former showing stronger associations (hazard ratio, HR = 4.478; 95% CI: 1.840-10.895; p = 0.001) than the latter (HR = 2.336; 95% CI: 1.057-5.164; p = 0.036). Older age and biopsy ISUP grade group 2 were independent clinical predictors of adverse tumor grade, associated with larger tumors that eventually presented non-organ-confined disease. CONCLUSIONS: In a very favorable PCa patient population, adverse tumor grade was an unfavorable prognostic factor for disease progression. Active surveillance in very favorable intermediate-risk patients is still a hazard, so molecular and genetic testing of biopsy specimens is needed.

Comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes in obese patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) versus open radical prostatectomy (ORP): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The purpose of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis of the perioperative outcomes associated with robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RARP) versus open radical prostatectomy (ORP) in the obese population diagnosed with prostate cancer. We performed a comprehensive search in key databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, encompassing studies of all languages, with a final search date of April 2024. We also omitted articles that consisted of conference abstracts and content that was not pertinent to our study. The aggregated outcomes were evaluated utilizing the metrics of weighted mean differences (WMDs) and odds ratios (ORs). A sensitivity analysis was also integrated into our assessment. The meta-analysis was facilitated by employing Stata/MP version 18 software. Additionally, the study was duly registered with PROSPERO under the identifier: CRD 42024540216. This meta-analysis, which included five trials, shows that compared to ORP, RARP is associated with a reduced estimated blood loss (EBL) (WMD -445.77, 95%CI -866.08, -25.45; p = 0.038), a decreased transfusion rate (OR 0.17, 95%CI 0.13, 0.21; p < 0.001), and a diminished overall complication rate (OR 0.71, 95%CI 0.58, 0.86; p = 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in operative time (OT) (WMD 1.88, 95%CI -46.53, 50.28; p = 0.939) or length of stay (LOS) (WMD -0.41, 95%CI -1.07, 0.25; p = 0.221). Among patients with obesity and prostate cancer, RARP demonstrates advantages over ORP by reducing estimated blood loss, transfusion requirements, and the incidence of complications. Notably, there were no significant differences in operative duration and hospital stay between the two surgical approaches. These findings suggest that RARP could be a preferable surgical option for obese individuals with prostate cancer.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Peritoneal Interposition Flap in Symptomatic Lymphocele Reduction following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Insights from the PIANOFORTE Trial.

The available randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the influence of peritoneal interposition flaps (PIF) on the reduction of symptomatic lymphoceles (sLCs) post robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) do not constitute a sufficient follow-up (FU) to assess the long-term effects. The PIANOFORTE trial was the first of these RCTs, showing no sLC reduction at the 3-month FU. Therefore, all 232 patients from the PIANOFORTE trial were invited for long-term FU. One hundred seventy-six patients (76%) presented themselves for FU and constituted the study group (SG). The median FU duration was 43 months. No significant differences in group allocation or LC endpoints at 90 days were observed between SG patients and patients not presenting themselves for the FU. During the FU period, four patients (2.3%) in the SG developed sLCs, and six patients (3.4%) developed asymptomatic lymphoceles (aLCs), which persisted in five patients (2.9%). There were no significant differences between PIF and non-PIF regarding sLC/aLC formation or persistence, newly developed complications, stress urinary incontinence or biochemical/clinical tumour recurrence. Therefore, this long-term FU confirms the primary outcomes of the PIANOFORTE trial that, while PIF does not impact complications or functionality, it does not reduce sLC/aLC rates. Furthermore, it shows the potential occurrence of LC after the third postoperative month.

On the relationship between various anticoagulants and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single-surgeon serial analysis.

Prostate cancer patients often have other health conditions and take anticoagulants. It was believed that surgery under anticoagulants could worsen surgical results. This study aims to explore the safety of robot-assisted prostatectomy in anticoagulated patients, without any exclusion criteria. The study included 500 patients who underwent RARP by a single surgeon between April 2019 and August 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1, consisting of 376 men (75.2%), did not receive any anticoagulation, while Group 2, with 124 patients (24.8%), received different forms of anticoagulation. Then, the anticoagulation group was divided into 4 subgroups according to their definite anticoagulation: the aspirin 15.6%, new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) 5.4%, Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) 2%, and dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) 1.8% subgroup. Postoperative complications and readmission rates were compared between the two study groups and subgroups. Patients in the combined group 2 were older and they also carried more comorbidities compared to men in group 1 (p = 0.03, p = 0.001).The study groups had similar oncological results, with 40.4% of patients having locally advanced cancers. Catheter days were longer in the anticoagulation group (4.5 vs 4 days, p = 0.001). No significant differences were observed between study groups for overall, minor, and major complications (p = 0.160, 0.100, and 0.915, respectively). In addition, readmissions were low (5.6%) and similar between the study groups (p = 0.635). Under cautious management, RARP under diverse anticoagulation regimes is safe and has comparable results to men with no medications. Further prospective studies must be conducted to confirm our findings.

Ten-year functional and oncological outcomes of a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Among prostate cancer (PCa) treatment options, mini-invasive surgical approaches have gained a wide diffusion in the last decades. The aim of this study was to present oncological, functional, and quality of life data after 10 years of follow-up of a prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) (ISRCTN11552140) comparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) for the treatment of PCa. METHODS: Patients with localized PCa were randomized to undergo LRP or RARP between January 2010 and January 2011. Functional (continence and potency) and oncological (prostate-specific antigen, biochemical recurrence [BCR] and BCR-free survival [BCRFS]) variables were evaluated. BCRFS curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Machine learning partial least square-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was used to identify the variables characterizing more the patients who underwent RARP or LRP. RESULTS: Seventy-five of the originally enrolled 120 patients remained on follow-up for 10 years; 40 (53%) underwent RARP and 35 (47%) LRP. Continence and potency recovery rates did not show significant differences (p = 0.068 and p = 0.56, respectively), despite a Δ12% for continence and Δ8% for potency in favor of the robotic approach. However, the quality of continence (in terms of International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form [ICIQ-SF] score) and erection (in terms of International Index of Erectile Function-5 [IIEF-5] score) was significantly better after 10 years in the robotic group (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001). PLS-DA revealed that LRP was characterized by the worst functional-related outcomes analyzing the entire follow-up period. Four (10%) and six (17%) patients experienced BCR in RARP and LRP groups, respectively (p = 0.36), with an overall 10-year BCR-free survival of 88% and 78% (p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Comparable continence and potency rates were observed between RARP and LRP after a 10-year follow-up. However, the RARP group exhibited superior totally dry rate and erection quality. No difference in terms of oncological outcomes was found.

Development of risk-score model in patients with negative surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

A total of 739 patients underwent RARP as initial treatment for PCa from November 2011 to October 2018. Data on BCR status, clinical and pathological parameters were collected from the clinical records. After excluding cases with neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapies, presence of lymph node or distant metastasis, and positive SM, a total of 537 cases were eligible for the final analysis. The median follow-up of experimental cohort was 28.0 (interquartile: 18.0-43.0) months. We identified the presence of International Society of Urological Pathology grade group (ISUP-GG) ≥ 4 (Hazard ratio (HR) 3.20, 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) 1.70-6.03, P < 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.00-4.12, P = 0.049), perineural invasion (HR 10.7, 95% CI 1.45-79.9, P = 0.020), and maximum tumor diameter (MTD) > 20 mm (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.01-3.70, P = 0.047) as significant factors of BCR in the multivariate analysis. We further developed a risk model according to these factors. Based on this model, 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year BCR-free survival were 100%, 98.9%, 98.9% in the low-risk group; 99.1%, 94.1%, 86.5% in the intermediate-risk group; 93.9%, 84.6%, 58.1% in the high-risk group. Internal validation using the bootstrap method showed a c-index of 0.742 and an optimism-corrected c-index level of 0.731. External validation was also carried out using an integrated database derived from 3 other independent institutions including a total of 387 patients for the final analysis. External validation showed a c-index of 0.655. In conclusion, we identified risk factors of biochemical failure in patients showing negative surgical margin after RARP and further developed a risk model using these risk factors.

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the novel hinotoriTM surgical robot system: initial experience and operation learning curve at a single institution.

Background: The hinotoriTM surgical robot system (HSRS) is the first made-in-Japan robotic system used for radical prostatectomy. Here, we report initial results and describe our learning curve (skill development) implementing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using HSRS (h-RARP). Methods: Between November 2021 and December 2022, 97 patients who underwent h-RARP at our institution were enrolled in this study. We retrospectively evaluated the surgical outcomes of the initial cases using h-RARP, comparing those of RARP using da Vinci surgical robot system (d-RARP) in our institution. Furthermore, the learning curves of two surgeons with the highest number of h-RARP were analyzed. Patients treated by each surgeon were categorized into two groups: 1-15 cases (earlier group) and >15 cases (later group). Preoperative patient characteristics, operation parameters, and complication rates were compared between the two groups. Results: In terms of surgical outcome, h-RARP was comparable to d-RARP. The procedures performed by the HSRS were successfully completed in all cases. There was no complication of grade 3 or higher. Comparing the two surgeons, surgeon 1, who had performed 40 d-RARP procedures, had time using robot system of the later group that was significantly shorter than that of the earlier group. However, for surgeon 2 with more than 100 d-RARP procedures, there was no statistically significant difference in time using robot system between groups. Other parameters showed no difference between earlier and later groups for the two surgeons. Conclusions: Our results show that surgical outcomes of h-RARP are comparable to those of d-RARP during the initial experience of clinical application. In addition, the surgeons' learning curves for the total RARP experience suggest that the experience of d-RARP can carry over to performance using the novel HSRS.

Inguinal hernia leads to worse immediate urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with inguinal hernia (IH) may have voiding dysfunction and weak urethra-stabilizing periurethral fascial tissues, contributing to urinary incontinence. This study aimed to review the association between IH and urinary continence after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS: This single-institution retrospective study included 251 consecutive cases of RARP between April 2019 and June 2022. Patients with concurrent IH or a history of adult IH repair were examined. The urine loss rate (ULR), defined as 24-h urine loss volume divided by the total urine volume immediately after urinary catheter removal (i.e., 6 or 7 postoperative days), was compared between the groups with (n = 33) and without IH (n = 214). Possible contributing factors for ULR were assessed, including age, body mass index (BMI), after benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery, prostate weight, and nerve-sparing. ULR was compared intergroup after propensity score matching countering selection biases. RESULTS: Patients with IH were older (71.3 versus. 66.8 years, p < 0.01), had lower BMI (22.8 versus. 24.3, p < 0.01), and had higher ULR (14.5% versus. 5.1%, p < 0.01). In a multiple linear regression analysis (adjusted R2 = 0.084), IH (p < 0.01) was an independent contributing factor for ULR besides advancing age (p < 0.03). After propensity score matching adjusted for patient's age and nerve-sparing, patients with IH had higher ULR (14.1% versus. 5.7%, p < 0.03) as well. CONCLUSIONS: This study first reported that IH may be one of the risk factors of urinary incontinence after RARP.

A transparent synthetic peptide hydrogel as a haemostatic agent in athermal nerve sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an observational study.

Background: PuraStat® is a new synthetic haemostatic agent constituting peptides that self-assemble into sheets when exposed to ionic charges. The objective of this submission is to assess the perioperative, functional and user-reported outcomes of PuraStat® as an athermal topical haemostatic agent for use on the neurovascular bundle (NVB) in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), and to inform further research into this developing field. Methods: Demographic and disease data for 29 consecutive patients undergoing RARP were recorded. PuraStat® was used as the primary haemostatic agent to the NVB, without thermal or suture haemostasis, unless necessary. Preoperative, 1-h postoperative and 24-h postoperative haemoglobin (Hb) were measured. Operative data including postoperative complications up to 30 days were noted. Urinary function, continence and erectile function (EF) were measured pre- and postoperatively with the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), patient reporting of pad usage, and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5 respectively. A qualitative assessment of PuraStat® was made intraoperatively by the surgical assistant in the following categories: transparency, haemostatic efficacy, ready-to-use, handling, and overall satisfaction. Results: Twenty-nine males aged between 49 and 75 years underwent a nerve-sparing RARP under a single surgeon for clinically significant prostate cancer with PuraStat® used as the primary haemostatic agent at the NVB. One patient required an additional haemostatic suture. The median prostate volume was 36 mL. Mean blood loss was 363 mL. The mean Hb at 1 and 24 h postoperative was 135.2 and 125.1 mg/dL. Median Hb change from 1-24 h postoperative was 11 mg/dL. No transfusions were required, and there were no postoperative complications. Urinary function and continence were preserved. EF in our series was lower than published data. Conclusions: Our observational study suggests that PuraStat® is a safe haemostatic agent in RARP with similar perioperative bleeding outcomes, comparable long-term urinary outcomes and a high level of intraoperative user satisfaction. The effects on EF requires further investigation. PuraStat® appears to be a useful therapeutic tool for the urologist performing RARPs.

Surgical techniques to preserve continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Radical prostatectomy significantly impacts the inherent anatomy of the male pelvis and the functional mechanisms of urinary continence. Incontinence has a considerable negative influence on the quality of life of patients, as well as their social and psychological wellbeing. Numerous surgical techniques have been demonstrated to support the preservation of continence during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). In this in-depth analysis, we give a general summary of the surgical techniques used in RARP and their impact on incontinence rates.

Assessment of routine same-day discharge surgery for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: It is important for robotic surgery to be cost-effective, especially by reducing the length of stay (LOS). Therefore, we developed a protocol for day-case robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). This study aimed to validate this as a safe practice of care and to assess the potential benefits to the hospital and patient. METHODS: In this single-centre study, all patients booked for RARP between April 2022 and October 2022 were screened for suitability for day case. All tumour types were included. Exclusion criteria were a history of complex abdominal surgeries, salvage prostatectomy, body mass index (BMI) > 35 and patient living alone or > 150 km away from the hospital. All day-case RARPs were performed as a morning case with a protocol for review throughout the day with evening discharge if mobilising independently and eating/drinking well. The primary outcome of the study was success rate of discharge home on day of surgery (DOS) with secondary outcomes of readmissions and complications. A patient questionnaire was completed at home including both visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction rating. RESULTS: Forty-five patients underwent day-case RARP over a 6-month period with minimum of 30 days of follow-up. 41/45 (91%) had successful DOS discharge home. The four admissions overnight were due to dizziness, low oxygen saturation, intraoperative complications and a diagnosis of COVID-19. There were no readmissions and no 30-day complications. The most common issues at home were catheter discomfort and constipation with low mean VAS pain score and low nausea reported. The overall patient satisfaction rating was very high at 4.8/5, and 97% said they would recommend to a family member. The cost saving for the hospital was 400 pounds per patient. CONCLUSION: Day-case procedure is a viable, safe and efficient pathway for appropriately selected and counselled patients undergoing RARP.

Lost Needle During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Laparoscopic or robotic radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy require needle suturing and manipulation. Although uncommon, if a needle is lost during laparoscopy, locating and removing it is challenging. Here, we report a case of needle loss during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP). A 51-year-old patient with localized prostate cancer underwent RARP. After vesicourethral anastomosis using a 3-0 Barbed Suture with two threads connected in the tail, the two threads were held with a needle holder. One needle was lost during removal through a 12 mm trocar. A thorough laparoscopic examination of the abdominal cavity identified a needle attached to the abdominal wall, which was successfully removed. Needle loss is uncommon, but familiarity with handling and preventing such cases helps surgeons address further deterioration. Stepwise and intensive exploration should be performed to confirm the needle location.

Initial experience and short-term outcomes of single-port extraperitoneal transvesical robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a two-center study.

Background: This study presents the procedure of single-port extraperitoneal transvesical approach to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (SETvRARP) on the da Vinci Xi platform coupling with a 4-channel single port and evaluated the short-term outcomes in the first 72 prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Methods: Seventy-two patients with localized PCa were enrolled. Each operation was conducted by the same single robotic surgery group in two centers using the da Vinci Xi system. Results: The median operation time was 150 min, and the median estimated blood loss was 50 mL. All operations were successfully carried out without open conversion or transfusion. No ≥ Grade II complications were noted. Urethral catheters were routinely removed on postoperative day 7. Sixty-eight (94.4%) patients recovered to immediate urinary continence after surgery, with 72 (100%) patients achieving full continence on postoperative day 14. A positive surgical margin was observed in 15 (20.8%) patients. Postoperative urodynamic studies regarding peak urinary flow, bladder capacity, and residual urine were not statically different from the preoperative results. No biochemical recurrence was noted in all patients within the follow-up period. Postoperative erectile function was not statistically different from the preoperative results (P=0.1697). Conclusions: SETvRARP using the da Vinci Xi system coupling with a 4-channel single port is a valid radical prostatectomy technique in well-selected PCa patients, resulting in superior postoperative recovery of urinary continence. Meanwhile, the outcomes in functional protection and cancer control need to be further investigated with a long-term follow-up duration.

Low- versus standard- pneumoperitoneum in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a randomised, triple-blinded study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness and impact of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (Pnp) on postoperative quality of recovery (QoR) and surgical workspace (SWS) in patients with prostate cancer undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomised, triple-blinded trial was conducted in a single centre in Denmark from March 2021 to January 2022. A total of 98 patients with prostate cancer undergoing RARP were randomly assigned to either low-pressure Pnp (7 mmHg) or standard-pressure Pnp (12 mmHg). Co-primary outcomes were postoperative QoR measured via the QoR-15 questionnaire on postoperative Day 1 (POD1), POD3, POD14, and POD30, and SWS assessed intraoperatively by a blinded assessor (surgeon) via a validated SWS scale. Data analysis was performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: Patients who underwent RARP at low Pnp pressure demonstrated better postoperative QoR on POD1 (mean difference = 10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.4-15.5), but no significant differences were observed in the SWS (mean difference = 0.25, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.54). Patients allocated to low-pressure Pnp experienced statistically higher blood loss than those in the standard-pressure Pnp group (mean difference = 67 mL, P = 0.01). Domain analysis revealed significant improvements in pain (P = 0.001), physical comfort (P = 0.007), and emotional state (P = 0.006) for patients with low-pressure Pnp. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04755452, on 16/02/2021. CONCLUSION: Performing RARP at low Pnp pressure is feasible without compromising the SWS and improves postoperative QoR, including pain, physical comfort, and emotional state, compared to the standard pressure.

Impact of positive surgical margins (PSMs) after robotic prostatectomy on biochemical recurrence (BCR): Multicenter analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To study and analyze any correlations between positive surgical margins after RARP and biochemical recurrence. METHODS: We enrolled 105 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) from 2016-2020 with PSMs on final pathology, all performed or supervised by a senior surgeon in two tertiary referral center. Pathology has been described indicating also the area (apical, base, mediolateral, anterior, or multiple) and the extent of PSMs: focal (≤3 mm) or extensive (>3 mm). Cox univariable and multi-variable regression models were used to find the correlation between clinico-pathologic factors: age, local staging, PSA, grading, area, and size of PSMs). RESULTS: We found a good correlation between PSA and grading and between PSA and local staging (T) (p < 0.001). There was no clear correlation between the PSM area with grading nor with T staging. There is a statistically significant correlation between extensive PSM and the worsening of grading and local staging (p < 0.001). BCR rate also has a strong correlation with the worsening of grading and local staging (T) (p < 0.001). A relevant fact is the difference between the BCR rate in the apical and base PSM (34.88%vs 62.5%; p < 0.001) which are the most frequent locations of PSMs. DISCUSSION: PSMs remain a predictor of BCR but which may have controversial significance. The likelihood of BCR increases as grading or local staging gets worse. However, apical PSM is a relatively less powerful predictor of postoperative BCR. This can help to better select patients for subsequent RT, which still causes important side effects.