Rectal perforation following SpaceOAR placement combined with permanent prostate brachytherapy.

Introduction: We report a case of rectal perforation following SpaceOAR placement utilized with iodine-125 low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Case presentation: A 65-year-old patient with localized prostate cancer underwent SpaceOAR placement following LDR-BT. No significant issues occurred with the SpaceOAR procedure, and no abnormalities were found on the next day's T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Two weeks later, a colonoscopy was performed due to mucus stools revealing rectal perforation attributed to SpaceOAR. By maintaining Macrogol 4000 and a low residue diet, the perforation healed within 6 months. Conclusion: Rectal ulcers and perforations are the most common severe adverse events from SpaceOAR placement. Effective management strategies are crucial since complications can't be entirely avoided, even with skilled surgeons.

Impalement injury of anorectum-A rare presentation.

INTRODUCTION: A rectal impalement injury is a rare type of penetrating injury that involves a solid object being forcefully inserted through anal opening. The removal of such injuries should be planned carefully with preparedness to assess and manage associated injuries in the pelvis and peri-anal region. CASE DESCRIPTION: An elderly female, around 65 years old, had a history of accidental penetration of an iron rod into her anal orifice. The patient was hemodynamically stable, and the distal end of the penetrated rod was visible in the anal verge on arrival. On evaluation, we found that the object had perforated the posterior wall of the middle 1/3rd of the rectum and had traversed retroperitoneally, bypassing all major vessels and viscera. DISCUSSION: We performed exploratory laparotomy, and the iron rod was extracted from the anal canal under vision, and a diversion colostomy of the sigmoid colon was performed. The patient had an uneventful recovery, and the reversal of the sigmoid colostomy was done after 3 months. CONCLUSION: Rectal impalement injuries are rare and serious. It requires a multidisciplinary approach involving a general surgeon, a vascular surgeon, and a urologist since it is associated with a higher incidence of involving major pelvic organs and vessels. In our case, the penetrating object had bypassed all major vessels, which is a rare occurrence.

Rectal perforation after laser hemorrhoidoplasty: a case report.

This case report outlines the intricate management of rectal perforation following laser hemorrhoidoplasty in a 31-year-old female, leading to an acute abdomen, sepsis, and multiorgan failure. Urgent laparoscopic exploration and the establishment of a double-loop colostomy were undertaken, marking the beginning of a complex course characterized by relapsed pelvic sepsis. Laser hemorrhoidoplasty has gained widespread acceptance for its minimally invasive approach in treating hemorrhoids. Remarkably, to our knowledge, the case we present is the first major complication reported after laser hemorrhoidoplasty, likely attributed to collateral thermic and mechanical tissue damage.

A rare case of fatal rectal perforation and sepsis following traumatic urinary catheterization.

This case report details a fatal rectal perforation and sepsis in a comorbid 96-year-old male after traumatic urinary catheterization, highlighting the risks of IDC management in elderly patients with complex health backgrounds. Despite maximal medical therapy, including escalated antibiotics and ICU care, the patient died from septic shock linked to improper catheter insertion by a non-specialist nurse in the community. This case emphasizes the urgent need for better catheterization practices, specialized nursing education, and clear guidelines to prevent such outcomes.

Combined uterine injury and high rectal perforation complicating abdominal ectopic pregnancy: A case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Abdominal pregnancy is a rare and potentially fatal variant of ectopic pregnancy, presenting unique clinical challenges. This report discusses an unusual case of abdominal pregnancy associated with uterine and high rectal perforations, complications that are rarely reported in clinical practice. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case involving a 31-year-old woman from a rural area, with a psychiatric history, presenting severe abdominal pain, vomiting, and constipation. Initial investigations revealed a hemopneumoperitoneum and a fetal skeleton in the pelvic area by CT, leading to a diagnosis of abdominal pregnancy. Surgical findings included a nonviable fetus, approximately 5 months gestational age, and perforations in both the rectum and the posterior uterine wall. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: The patient underwent extensive surgery, including placental dissection, anterior rectal resection, Hartmann's colostomy, hysterorrhaphy, and drainage of the peritoneal cavity. The complexity of managing abdominal pregnancy, especially with additional complications such as organ perforations, poses significant surgical challenges. This case emphasizes the need to consider abdominal pregnancy in differential diagnoses of abdominal pain in women, due to the risk of misdiagnosis and complex surgical requirements. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the critical importance of prompt diagnosis and comprehensive care in managing rare and life-threatening presentations of abdominal pregnancy. It underscores the need to increase awareness among clinicians for timely intervention and provides information on the complexities of surgical management in cases with additional organ perforations.

A well-managed case of discontinuous anorectal injury caused by a personal watercraft treated by combining surgery and colonoscopy.

Background: Anorectal injury caused by personal watercraft (PWC)-related trauma is rare. However, PWC accidents have increased recently, and since patients tend to be younger, treatment strategies should consider anal function preservation in addition to saving lives. Case Presentation: A 30-year-old female patient who fell into the water when a PWC suddenly accelerated and injured her perineum with a forceful water jet was transported to our hospital. On examination, she was diagnosed with a traumatic rectal perforation with intraperitoneal findings and an anorectal injury. Emergency surgery, which involved direct suturing, temporary colostomy with intraoperative endoscopy for the rectal perforation, and anorectal reconstruction, was performed. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 19 without complications, and the colostomy was closed 5 months postoperatively. Conclusion: We encountered a case of multiple noncontinuous anorectal injuries due to a PWC accident that was successfully treated using a combination of surgery and intraoperative endoscopy.

Transanal small bowel evisceration: A case report and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Transanal small bowel evisceration remains a rarely recorded emergent situation in the scientific literature. This article describes the rather seldom complication of a non-treated long standing rectal prolapse presenting in the form of transanal prolapse of the small bowel due to rectal perforation. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We present the case of an 84 year old female, who presented to our emergency department with transanal evisceration of the small bowel. DISCUSSION: This rare case presentation led us to perform an accompanying review of the literature, using Pubmed® searching for the words "transanal evisceration", "rectal prolapse", and "rectal perforation". We discuss the outcomes of our literature review, possible pathogenesis and the available treatment options. CONCLUSION: Although transanal evisceration of small bowel presents a rare emergency, having the knowledge of this condition would help early recognition of this incidence and hopefully lead to early treatment, which would avoid drastic consequences as a result of small bowel strangulation.

Rectal stercoral perforation: an uncommon anatomical localization of a rare surgical emergency.

A stercoral rectal perforation is an uncommon cause of acute abdominal pain with only limited cases documented in medical literature. Timely and accurate imaging is essential when this condition is suspected, and immediate surgical intervention is imperative upon confirming the diagnosis of bowel perforation. Usually, the definitive diagnosis of a stercoral rectal perforation is established intraoperatively and a Hartmann procedure with (temporary) end colostomy is performed. In this case report, we present our first-hand experience in managing a stercoral rectal perforation, highlighting the importance of early diagnosis and rapid surgical intervention to achieve favorable outcomes.

Characteristics and Outcomes Associated With Emergent Rectal Foreign Body Management: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

Background Bedside management and outcomes of rectal foreign bodies remain challenging due to the presentation and complexity of the inserted objects. Injuries, such as perforation of the colon and rectum, are among the most commonly reported complications. However, prior studies are unclear regarding the setting in which the complication rates may be minimized. This study aimed to assess whether there was a statistically significant difference among the various extraction methods with regard to complications in the emergency department and operating room. Materials and methods This was a retrospective study of all cases of rectal foreign bodies that were removed in the emergency department at a large county hospital between 1/1/2010 and 12/31/2020. Patients included in this study were adults who were evaluated and treated in the emergency department. Results A total of 78 patients were included in the final analysis. More than half (51.3%, n=40) of the patients were successfully treated in the emergency department. Compared with the emergency department, patients in the operating room were more likely to undergo exploratory laparotomy and colectomy (0% vs. 31.6%, p<0.0001), undergo general anesthesia (84.2% vs. 0%, p<0.0001), have higher complication rates (21% vs. 0%, p=0.0021), and have a longer hospital length of stay (median=1 vs. 0, p<0.0001). Conclusion This study revealed a >50% success rate of rectal foreign body removal in the emergency department without any reported complications. To improve the success rate of bedside retrieval and decrease complications, physicians need to be vigilant, communicative, and compassionate about their evaluations and clinical methodology.

Spontaneous rectosigmoid perforation at the watershed area of the Sudeck point in an apparently healthy toddler boy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous colon perforation can be classified into stercoral and idiopathic. Stercoral type is associated with chronic constipation, thus it is rare in infants and children. The idiopathic type is sporadic and could occur at any age. Delay in diagnosing or treating idiopathic colon perforation is associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. There are few studies on rectal perforation related to other etiologies or past the neonatal period, and their effect on disease onset and prognosis are unknown. CASE PRESENTATION: We report on a case of 2-year-and-5-month-old Oromo boy who presented with fever, diarrhea, vomiting, and progressive abdominal pain of 5-day duration. The boy underwent an exploratory laparotomy for suspected peritonitis and there was a single perforation of approximately 2.0 cm size in the anterior part of the upper one-third of rectum. The perforated rectum was repaired primarily and sigmoid divided diversion colostomy was carried out. CONCLUSION: It is important to be aware of idiopathic colon perforation in children, a rare but dangerous condition with high mortality and morbidity in cases of delayed diagnosis or management. Pediatricians and surgeons should consider colon perforation as a cause in children who present with abdominal distention and a history of diarrhea for more than 5 days.

Rectal Perforation Secondary to a Self-Administered Water-Hose Enema: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Chronic functional constipation is a common condition that can have a significant impact on a patient's quality of life and healthcare costs. Hydrostatic enemas are a commonly observed practice among patients with chronic constipation. Rectal perforation is a rare yet serious complication that can be fatal if not diagnosed and treated promptly. Here, we present the case of an elderly lady with Parkinson's disease who presented with upper rectal perforation after using a hydrostatic enema and was treated with Hartmann's procedure. This case highlights the importance of having a low threshold for suspecting and diagnosing colorectal perforation in patients presenting with abdominal pain after receiving a hydrostatic enema.

Rare complication of ganglion impar blockade with the transsacrococcygeal approach: A case of rectal perforation.

Although it has been reported that caution should be exercised in terms of rectal perforation, as the ganglion impar is located just behind the rectum in the presacral space, the authors could not find any case or images of rectal perforation occurring during ganglion impar blockade in the literature. In this report, the case of a 38-year-old female with rectal perforation that developed during ganglion impar blockade, performed by the transsacrococcygeal approach under fluoroscopy guidance, is presented. Wrong needle selection and the structurally short presacral space of the patient may have influenced the development of rectal perforation in the patient. This study presents the first case and images of rectal perforation in the literature that developed during the application of ganglion impar blockade using the transsacrococcygeal technique. In ganglion impar block applications, technically appropriate needles should be used, and care should be taken in terms of rectal perforation.

A case of tension pneumoperitoneum with fecal peritonitis due to high-pressure air insufflation through the anus.

Key Clinical Message: The reckless or ridiculous usage of high pressure compressed air could lead to disastrous consequences as demonstrated in this case. Injuries from a barotrauma can vary from a simple mucosal laceration to tension pneumoperitoneum causing abdominal compartment syndrome. Decompression by a wide-bore needle can be done as depicted in our patient to provide immediate relief. Abstract: Rectal perforation most commonly occurs due to trauma, but rarely due to a high pressure compressed air passing through the anus as a part of playful joke. Owing to the belief of medico-legal issues and socio-psychological circumstances about the ano-rectal injury, initial approach to the medical facilities might be delayed, causing a delayed presentation and poor prognosis. We report an incident of a young male who presented with tension pneumoperitoneum causing abdominal compartment syndrome with fecal peritonitis due to forceful passing of high-pressure air through his anus. An initial decompression of the abdomen with a wide-bore needle was done at the emergency room. An emergency laparotomy with a primary repair of the rectal perforation by two layered sutures was done followed by a loop colostomy, 10 cm proximal to the injury. Colostomy closure was performed after 4 weeks. Post-operative recovery period was uneventful.

Extensive subcutaneous emphysema and intra-abdominal sepsis following haemorrhoid operation: a rare complication of a novel procedure.

Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation and recto anal repair (HAL-RAR) procedure is a relatively new, minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of Grades III and IV haemorrhoids. A 71-year-old female presented with sepsis, abdominal distension and extensive subcutaneous emphysema and was found to have intra- and extraperitoneal rectal perforation requiring repair, laparoscopy and sigmoid colostomy. Suture ligation of the haemorrhoidal artery can inadvertently be above the peritoneal reflection and result in full thickness rectal perforation secondary to ischaemic necrosis. Previous vaginal prolapse mesh repair should be considered as a relative contraindication to HAL-RAR as it can significantly distort the anatomy.

Stapled disc excision for the repair of intraoperative rectal injury during robotic surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis.

INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative rectal perforation is an uncommon complication of pelvic surgery, which can be life-threatening and often leads to high morbidity and stoma formation rate. PURPOSE: No consensus has been reached regarding a standard of care for intraoperative iatrogenic pelvic injury. This article presents a technique for a stapled repair to completely resect a full-thickness low rectal perforation during robotic surgery for advanced endometriosis and avoid a high-risk colorectal anastomosis and the possible need for stoma formation. CONCLUSION: Stapled discoid excision is a novel and safe technique for the repair of intraoperative rectal injuries, showing multiple benefits compared to the standard colorectal resection with or without anastomosis.

Rectum Perforation Secondary to Ingested Chicken Bone Presenting as Peri-Anal Abscess: A Case Report.

Rectal perforation secondary to an ingested foreign body is a rare occurrence that can be challenging to diagnose. It may initially present as a perianal abscess. Herein, we report a rare incident involving a patient who presented with a perianal abscess. The initial assessment and an abdominal CT scan revealed a large horseshoe perianal abscess with a small linear hyperdensity noted near the anal verge. The patient was taken to the operating room, where he was found to have perforated the rectum due to an ingested chicken bone. The procedure involved the incision and drainage of the abscess, along with the removal of the foreign body.

Gluteal Abscess Secondary to Rectal Perforation Due to Ingested Foreign Body: A Report of Two Cases.

Gastrointestinal abscesses are commonly caused by infection and inflammatory and, in rare cases, malignant bowel conditions. This paper reports two cases of rectum/gluteal abscesses due to an ingested foreign body. The goal of this case report is to highlight the need to raise suspicion of foreign body ingestion in the setting of a gluteal abscess with a foreign body that may have caused rectal perforation and subsequent gluteal abscess formation.

Necrotising Myofasciitis of the Lower Limb Secondary to Extra-Peritoneal Rectal Perforation.

Necrotising fasciitis (NF) is a severe and life-threatening soft tissue infection that often requires extensive debridement and reconstruction. Isolated extra-peritoneal rectal perforations due to trauma, cancer, inflammatory bowel pathology or iatrogenically induced can rarely cause necrotising fasciitis beyond the perineum. Given its rarity, there is a high threshold of suspicion which often leads to late recognition and poor outcome. We present a case of necrotising myofasciitis of the right lower limb following occult rectal perforation sustained during elective flexible sigmoidoscopy, and augment this case report with a literature review to guide diagnostics, intervention, and recovery. Therefore, the aim of this work was to review, compile, analyse, and present clinical details to identify masquerading presentations and determine the optimal treatment regimen. A search of PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, AMED, Web of Science (Science Citation Index), and Google Scholar was supplemented by hand searching. Data extracted included demographics, patient management, and outcome. Of 104 citations identified by a systematic literature search, eight case reports of eight subjects with necrotising fasciitis of the lower limb secondary to rectal perforation met the criteria for analysis. The most common treatment modality was surgical debridement in all cases and bilateral above knee amputation in one case, disarticulation of the lower limb was the treatment in this case we report. Furthermore, faecal diversion by the formation of de-functioning colostomy was performed in the same setting for four (50%) of the patients and appeared to increase survival. Overall 45 days mean (S.E.) disease-specific survival was found to be 32.8 (7.0) days. There is an insufficient number of cases reported to date to confer a significant survival advantage between having a defunctioning colostomy in the same setting as the debridement as opposed to having it at a later setting or not having it at all (Mantel-Cox p=0.1). In summary, a review of all the cases in the literature suggests that NF of lower limbs can be an atypical presentation of rectal cancer, pathology, and/or trauma. We report a case of unilateral lower limb NF secondary to rectal perforation in a non-cancer patient, likely due to flexible sigmoidoscopy. Due to the small number of patients, it is inherently difficult to draw firm conclusions however multi-modality management appears to be more effective, with meticulous debridement, defunctioning of the bowel and downstaging radiotherapy if required. We recommend a UK-wide, national database/registry for NF that will help gather data and formulate more standardised management guidelines.

Rectal Perforation During Pelvic Surgery.

Rectal perforations during pelvic surgery are rare but serious complications. The occurrence of rectal involvement is generally lower than that of the involvement of other portions of the bowel. The urologic field is responsible for the majority of iatrogenic rectal injuries from pelvic surgery; general and gynecologic surgeries are prone to the occurrence as well, the latter especially in the case of rectal shaving for deep infiltrating endometriosis. Attention should be posed to the prevention of rectal injuries, especially in case of challenging or salvage procedures; some tricks may be recommended to avoid thermal and mechanical damages and to realize a safe dissection. Intraoperative detection of rectal injuries is of paramount importance; once confirmed, immediate management with the closure of the defect is recommended. In general, rectal injuries diagnosed after surgery are liable to significantly worse outcomes than those detected and managed intraoperatively. Patient summary: Rectal perforation is a rare but possible complication of pelvic surgeries. The more challenging the procedure (ie, surgery for locally advanced tumors or after radiation therapy), the higher the risk of rectal lesion. Intraoperative management of the injury should be attempted, with direct repair of the defect with or without fecal diversion.

Metal stent combined with ileus drainage tube for the treatment of delayed rectal perforation: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Acute iatrogenic colorectal perforation (AICP) is a serious adverse event, and immediate AICP usually requires early endoscopic closure. Immediate surgical repair is required if the perforation is large, the endoscopic closure fails, or the patient's clinical condition deteriorates. In cases of delayed AICP (> 4 h), surgical repair or enterostomy is usually performed, but delayed rectal perforation is rare. CASE SUMMARY: A 53-year-old male patient underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) at a local hospital for the treatment of a laterally spreading tumor of the rectum, and the wound was closed by an endoscopist using a purse-string suture. Unfortunately, the patient then presented with delayed rectal perforation (6 h after ESD). The surgeons at the local hospital attempted to treat the perforation and wound surface using transrectal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM); however, the perforation worsened and became enlarged, multiple injuries to the mucosa around the perforation and partial tearing of the rectal mucosa occurred, and the internal anal sphincter was damaged. As a result, the perforation became more complicated. Due to the increased bleeding, surgical treatment with suturing could not be performed using TEM. Therefore, the patient was sent to our medical center for follow-up treatment. After a multidisciplinary discussion, we believed that the patient should undergo an enterostomy. However, the patient strongly refused this treatment plan. Because the position of the rectal perforation was relatively low and the intestine had been adequately prepared, we attempted to treat the complicated delayed rectal perforation using a self-expanding covered mental stent (SECMS) in combination with a transanal ileus drainage tube (TIDT). CONCLUSION: For patients with complicated delayed perforation in the lower rectum and adequate intestinal preparation, a SECMS combined with a TIDT can be used and may result in very good outcomes.