Enhancing the value of radiology reports: a primer for residents.

PURPOSE: The radiology report is the primary work product of the diagnostic radiologist. Its quality is a direct reflection of his or her knowledge, experience, and confidence. Certain factors hindering one's ability to deliver a diagnostically accurate and concise report are sometimes unavoidable (e.g., study limitations and insufficient history); however, radiologists who routinely produce deficient reports not only erode their credibility and reputation amongst colleagues, they magnify their risk of litigation. METHODS: This article is directed toward radiology residents to help facilitate the adoption of effective reporting habits. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Up to 92% of referring physicians and 95% of radiologists agree that learning to report should be an "obligatory and well-structured" component of radiology residency education as discussed by Bosmans JM, Weyler JJ, De Schepper AM, and Parizel PM. Unfortunately, this remains the exception rather than the rule. This article is written with the following objectives: (1) to identify strategies that improve the value of radiology reporting, (2) to define the features of a high-quality radiology report, (3) to instill trust and respect from referring clinicians through clear, accurate, and effective communication, and (4) to understand and avoid potential medicolegal ramifications of deficient radiology reports.

Depression in later life: A closer look at the gender gap.

Gender differences in depressive symptoms have been extensively documented, with women reporting a higher number of depressive symptoms than men. However, studies offer different explanations for why such a gap exists. The goal of the current paper is to analyze how much of the observed gender gap in depression may be attributed to (1) compositional versus (2) reporting differences or (3) differences in reactivity to adversities. We contribute to this literature by testing, net of compositional differences, whether the relationship between reporting behavior and depressive symptoms is gendered and whether accounting for the possibility of gender-specific reactivity alters the structure of the gender gap at older ages. Our results show that the observed gender gap in depression (1) only partially derives from compositional differences; (2) is not an artifact of a gender-specific reporting style; and remarkably (3) men appear more sensitive to adversities.