RESUMEN
Viruses are widely recognized to be intricately associated with both solid and hematological malignancies in humans. The primary goal of this research is to elucidate the interplay of genes between SARS-CoV-2 infection and lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), with a preliminary investigation into their clinical significance and underlying molecular mechanisms. Transcriptome data for SARS-CoV-2 infection and LUAD were sourced from public databases. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection were identified and subsequently overlapped with TCGA-LUAD DEGs to discern the crosstalk genes (CGs). In addition, CGs pertaining to both diseases were further refined using LUAD TCGA and GEO datasets. Univariate Cox regression was conducted to identify genes associated with LUAD prognosis, and these genes were subsequently incorporated into the construction of a prognosis signature using 10 different machine learning algorithms. Additional investigations, including tumor mutation burden assessment, TME landscape, immunotherapy response assessment, as well as analysis of sensitivity to antitumor drugs, were also undertaken. We discovered the risk stratification based on the prognostic signature revealed that the low-risk group demonstrated superior clinical outcomes (p < 0.001). Gene set enrichment analysis results predominantly exhibited enrichment in pathways related to cell cycle. Our analyses also indicated that the low-risk group displayed elevated levels of infiltration by immunocytes (p < 0.001) and superior immunotherapy response (p < 0.001). In our study, we reveal a close association between CGs and the immune microenvironment of LUAD. This provides preliminary insight for further exploring the mechanism and interaction between the two diseases.
RESUMEN
Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) depletion has been postulated as a contributor to the severity of COVID-19; however, no study has prospectively characterized NAD+ and its metabolites in relation to disease severity in patients with COVID-19. We measured NAD+ and its metabolites in 56 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and in two control groups without COVID-19: (1) 31 age- and sex-matched adults with comorbidities, and (2) 30 adults without comorbidities. Blood NAD+ concentrations in COVID-19 group were only slightly lower than in the control groups (p < 0.05); however, plasma 1-methylnicotinamide concentrations were significantly higher in patients with COVID-19 (439.7 ng/mL, 95% CI: 234.0, 645.4 ng/mL) than in age- and sex-matched controls (44.5 ng/mL, 95% CI: 15.6, 73.4) and in healthy controls (18.1 ng/mL, 95% CI 15.4, 20.8; p < 0.001 for each comparison). Plasma nicotinamide concentrations were also higher in COVID-19 group and in controls with comorbidities than in healthy control group. Plasma concentrations of 2-methyl-2-pyridone-5-carboxamide (2-PY), but not NAD+, were significantly associated with increased risk of death (HR = 3.65; 95% CI 1.09, 12.2; p = 0.036) and escalation in level of care (HR = 2.90, 95% CI 1.01, 8.38, p = 0.049). RNAseq and RTqPCR analyses of PBMC mRNA found upregulation of multiple genes involved in NAD+ synthesis as well as degradation, and dysregulation of NAD+-dependent processes including immune response, DNA repair, metabolism, apoptosis/autophagy, redox reactions, and mitochondrial function. Blood NAD+ concentrations are modestly reduced in COVID-19; however, NAD+ turnover is substantially increased with upregulation of genes involved in both NAD+ biosynthesis and degradation, supporting the rationale for NAD+ augmentation to attenuate disease severity.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Limited data on the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during pregnancy on newborn outcomes are available. This study aimed to characterize and compare the clinical outcomes of newborns from women with and without the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection during late pregnancy. METHOD: This was a retrospective cohort study of women who were either infected or not infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus during late pregnancy. The neonatal complications associated with COVID-19-positive pregnant women were investigated and analyzed. RESULTS: Among 2063 pregnant women over 28 weeks of gestation, 1.2%, 3.3%, and 18.7% of patients with multiple pregnancies, abnormal fetal positions, and lack of maternal or neonatal follow-up data, respectively, were excluded. Patients who were COVID-19-negative (60.6%) and -positive (16.2%) remained for further analysis. SARS-CoV-2 infection was significantly associated with higher SARS-CoV-2 infection rates in newborns (0% vs. 1.49%, P < 0.01) and longer duration of hospital stay (6.39 ± 2.2 vs. 4.92 ± 1.6, P < 0.01). However, comparing neonatal complications, including Apgar score, preterm birth, low birth weight, cesarean section rate, newborn hearing, neonatal congenital heart defects, and height and weight compliance rate of 6-month-old children, between non-infected and infected participants did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: SARS-CoV-2 infection in late pregnancy has no significant impact on neonatal outcomes. After six months of follow-up of the neonates, we observed that SARS-CoV-2 infection in the third trimester of pregnancy did not affect their growth and development. Hopefully, these findings will guide management strategies and clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/virología , Recién Nacido , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Tercer Trimestre del Embarazo , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Puntaje de ApgarRESUMEN
PURPOSE: VAccine Study COVID-19 (VASCO) is a cohort study with a 5-year follow-up that was initiated when COVID-19 vaccination was introduced in the Netherlands. The primary objective is to estimate real-world vaccine effectiveness (VE) of COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection in the Netherlands, overall and in four subpopulations defined by age and medical risk. PARTICIPANTS: The cohort consists of 45 547 community-dwelling participants aged 18-85 years who were included irrespective of their COVID-19 vaccination status or intention to get vaccinated. A medical risk condition is present in 4289 (19.8%) of 21 679 individuals aged 18-59 years, and in 9135 (38.3%) of 23 821 individuals aged 60-85 years. After 1 year of follow-up, 5502 participants had dropped out of the study. At inclusion and several times after inclusion, participants are asked to take a self-collected fingerprick blood sample in which nucleoprotein and spike protein receptor binding domain-specific antibody concentrations are assessed. Participants are also asked to complete monthly digital questionnaires in the first year, and 3 monthly in years 2-5, including questions on sociodemographic factors, health status, COVID-19 vaccination, SARS-CoV-2-related symptoms and testing results, and behavioural responses to COVID-19 measures. FINDINGS TO DATE: VASCO data have been used to describe VE against SARS-CoV-2 infection of primary vaccination, first and second booster and bivalent boosters, the impact of hybrid immunity on SARS-CoV-2 infection and VE against infectiousness. Furthermore, data were used to describe antibody response following vaccination and breakthrough infections and to investigate the relation between antibody response and reactogenicity. FUTURE PLANS: VASCO will be able to contribute to policy decision-making regarding future COVID-19 vaccination. Furthermore, VASCO provides an infrastructure to conduct further studies and to respond to changes in vaccination campaigns and testing policy, and new virus variants. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL9279.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Adulto , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adolescente , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Adulto Joven , Estudios de Cohortes , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangreRESUMEN
The effects of aging on the organism manifest in various ways, including profound and complex changes in functioning patterns, responses to stimuli, and regenerative capacity. Nevertheless, it is remarkable that some elderly individuals maintain their health and functionality despite advanced age, showing resilience to environmental adversities, such as SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this study, we examined a unique cohort of 100 individuals older than 90 years, including centenarians, who recovered from COVID-19 before the availability of vaccines in Brazil. We performed whole-exome analyses and identified incidental findings in four participants. These findings included pathogenic variants associated with serious conditions, such as cancer predisposition and cardiovascular diseases. Specifically, variants were found in the RYR1, DSP, BRCA2, BRCA1, and TTN genes. Also, other two individuals were homozygous for rare variants in the TYK2 gene, related to primary immunodeficiencies. The significance of these findings is underscored by the fact that, despite carrying these rare variants, these individuals surpassed 90 years of age and survived the COVID-19 pandemic. This suggests the presence of genetic protective factors that contribute to longevity and resilience. Therefore, this study provides new insights into interpreting incidental findings in long-lived populations and raises important questions for clinical practice and the genetics of longevity.
RESUMEN
Studies about the effects of SARS-CoV-2 on pregnant women and children born to positive women are controversial with regard to possible inner ear-related damage but most of them do not detect the involvement of this virus in auditory function. However, only a few studies on long-term effects on language development are currently available because of the recent onset of the pandemic. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on perceptual and expressive abilities and the emerging development of communication in young children. To this purpose, the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory-Words and Gestures form (CDI-WG), was administered to parents. In total, 115 children whose mother was infected by SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy were enrolled in the study and evaluated at the Audiology Service of the Modena University Hospital. All children underwent Otoacoustic Emissions (OAE) at birth: 114/115 had a "pass" result bilaterally, while 1 case had a unilateral "refer" result. Overall, 110/115 newborns (95.65%) underwent audiological evaluation between 10-18 months of age. In 5/110 patients (3.6%), the Pure Tone Average (PTA) result was equal to 35 dB; one case had a hearing threshold of around 50 dB due to a bilateral effusive otitis media. A notable finding was the percentage of children with tubal dysfunction in both evaluations, within 2 months of age and around 12 months of age. Most children revealed normal hearing. The CDI-WG was completed by 56/115 families. The rate of children below the fifth percentile was 8.9% for sentences understood, 12.5% for words understood, and 5.4% for words produced. Concerning CDI-Gestures, only 2 children (3.6%) were below the fifth percentile. A structured audiological follow-up in association with the evaluation of communication skills of children appears fundamental, particularly in the years of maximum neuroplasticity. Long-term studies are still necessary to evaluate the possible consequences of the pandemic.
RESUMEN
Recent studies have suggested an increased incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA vaccination or COVID-19. However, the potential interaction effect between vaccine type and COVID-19 on heart disease risk remains uncertain. Our study aimed to examine the impact of COVID-19 status and vaccine type following the first dose on acute heart disease in the Korean population, using data from the National Health Insurance Service COVID-19 database (October 2018-March 2022). We sought to provide insights for public health policies and clinical decisions pertaining to COVID-19 vaccination strategies. We analysed heart disease risk, including acute cardiac injury, acute myocarditis, acute pericarditis, cardiac arrest, and cardiac arrhythmia, in relation to vaccine type and COVID-19 within 21 days after the first vaccination date, employing Cox proportional hazards models with time-varying covariates. This study included 3,350,855 participants. The results revealed higher heart disease risk in individuals receiving mRNA vaccines than other types (adjusted HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.35-1.62). Individuals infected by SARS-CoV-2 also exhibited significantly higher heart disease risk than those uninfected (adjusted HR, 3.56; 95% CI, 1.15-11.04). We found no significant interaction effect between vaccine type and COVID-19 status on the risk of acute heart disease. Notably, however, younger individuals who received mRNA vaccines had a higher heart disease risk compared to older individuals. These results may suggest the need to consider alternative vaccine options for the younger population. Further research is needed to understand underlying mechanisms and guide vaccination strategies effectively.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Cardiopatías , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Enfermedad Aguda , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Cardiopatías/epidemiología , Cardiopatías/etiología , Vacunas de ARNm , República de Corea/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Long COVID, also called post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) affects millions of people in the world. The neurologic manifestations of PASC (Neuro-PASC) are among the most debilitating but they are largely unreported in Africa. We sought to compare the demographics, symptoms and cognitive profile of post-hospitalization Neuro-PASC (PNP) and non-hospitalized Neuro-PASC (NNP) patients in Nigeria. In this cross-sectional study performed at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital, 106/2319 (4.6%) SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals contacted via telephone reported Neuro-PASC symptoms with a higher frequency in PNP than in NNP individuals ((23/200 (11.5%) vs. 83/2119 (3.9%), p = < 0.0001). The predominant neurologic symptoms at any time during the disease course were difficulty remembering / brain fog (63/106; 59.4%), fatigue (59/106; 55.7%), sleep problems (34/106; 32%), headache (33/106; 31%), paresthesia (12/106; 11.3%), and myalgia (10/106; 9.4%). Of 66 participants with Neuro-PASC who underwent in-person neurological evaluation and cognitive screening, all had normal scores on the Intervention for Dementia in Elderly Africans cognition screen, while 11/65 (16.9%) that completed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment had results consistent with mild cognitive impairment (3/16 PNP (18.8%) and 8/49 NNP (16.3%); p = 1.0). Finally, 47/66 (71.2%) had digit span test scores consistent with mild cognitive dysfunction (12/16 PNP (75%) and 35/50 (70%) NNP; p = 1.0). Our findings reveal the previously unrecognized occurrence of Neuro-PASC among COVID-19 survivors in Nigeria and highlight the need for improved screening and diagnosis of Neuro-PASC in our population. Development of cognitive support services for persons suffering from Neuro-PASC in Nigeria is warranted.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 infection has become a major international issue, not only from a medical point of view, but also social, economic and political. Most of the available information comes from the United States, Europe, and China, where the population and the socioeconomic status are very different from Latin American countries. This study evaluates the effect of regional socioeconomic characteristics on mortality due SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRD) from Argentina, Mexico and Brazil. METHODS: Data from three national registries, SAR-COVID (Argentina), CMR-COVID (Mexico) and ReumaCoV-Brasil (Brazil), were combined. Adult IMRD patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were recruited. National data for each province/state, including population density, number of physicians per inhabitant, income, unemployment, GINI index, Municipal Human Development Index (MHDI), stringency index, vaccination rate and most frequent viral strains per period were assessed as risk factors for mortality due to COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of 4744 patients were included, 2534 (53.4%) from SAR-COVID, 1166 (24.6%) from CMRCOVID and 1044 (22.0%) from ReumaCoV-Brasil. Mortality due to COVID-19 was 5.4%. In the multivariable analysis, higher number of physicians per 1000 inhabitants and being infected during the vaccination period of each country were associated with lower mortality. After adjustment for socioeconomic factors, there was no association with country of residence and mortality. CONCLUSION: These findings corroborate the complex interplay between socioeconomic factors, rheumatic disease activity, and regional disparities as determinants of death due to COVID-19 in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico. Thus, this research provides valuable insights for guiding public health policies and clinical practice in the ongoing fight against the COVID-19 pandemic.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Factores Socioeconómicos , Humanos , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/epidemiología , Enfermedades Reumáticas/mortalidad , Brasil/epidemiología , México/epidemiología , Argentina/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , SARS-CoV-2 , Factores de Riesgo , Desempleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Sistema de Registros , Densidad de PoblaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite the development of various antiviral drugs, most of them are not effective in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as a hyperinflammatory disorder. Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2) is one of the critical CC chemokines involved in the pathogenesis and severity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. This study aimed to investigate the expression of CCL2 and CC chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2) in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Peripheral blood samples were collected from 60 confirmed COVID-19 patients and 60 age-matched healthy subjects. The ages of the subjects were categorized as follows: up to 20 years, 20 to 40 years, 40 to 60 years, and more than 60 years. CCL2 serum levels were measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). CCR2 gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was measured employing real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS: In all age groups, CCL2 serum levels were significantly elevated in patients compared to healthy controls (P < 0.0001). CCL2 levels were higher in severe patients than in moderate patients. Moreover, CCR2 expression by PBMCs was higher in patients compared to control subjects. However, a significant difference between patients and controls over 60 years of age was identified (P = 0.0353). There was no significant difference in CCR2 expression between moderate and severe COVID-19 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, the findings demonstrate that CCL2 and CCR2 are upregulated in COVID-19 patients at protein and mRNA levels, respectively. Therefore, the CCL2/CCR2 axis may be a potential therapeutic target in order to improve patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Quimiocina CCL2 , Leucocitos Mononucleares , Receptores CCR2 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Receptores CCR2/metabolismo , Receptores CCR2/genética , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/sangre , Quimiocina CCL2/sangre , Quimiocina CCL2/genética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Leucocitos Mononucleares/metabolismo , Leucocitos Mononucleares/inmunología , Adulto Joven , Anciano , Factores de Edad , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the roles of galectin-3 and irisin as biomarkers in predicting severe outcomes in COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: We analyzed serum levels of galectin-3 and irisin in 59 patients with severe COVID-19 and 30 healthy controls. Elevated galectin-3 levels were associated with increased risks of mortality, need for intensive care, and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. The optimal cut-off value for galectin-3 was 13.47 ng/ml, with a sensitivity of 72.7% and specificity of 76.6%. Irisin levels did not differ significantly between survivors and non-survivors at admission or on the 3rd day post-admission, but approached significance on the 7th day. These findings suggest that galectin-3 could be a valuable prognostic biomarker for severe COVID-19 outcomes, while irisin's role remains to be clarified in further studies.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores , COVID-19 , Fibronectinas , Galectina 3 , Humanos , COVID-19/sangre , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fibronectinas/sangre , Biomarcadores/sangre , Anciano , Galectina 3/sangre , Pronóstico , Galectinas/sangre , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , SARS-CoV-2 , Proteínas Sanguíneas/análisis , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Adulto , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/sangre , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/mortalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Most studies that explore the long-term effects of COVID-19 are based on subjectively reported symptoms, while laboratory-measured biomarkers are mainly examined in studies of relatively small cohorts. This study investigates the long-term effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on common laboratory biomarkers. METHODS: We utilized a retrospective cohort of SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals and rigorously matched controls based on demographic and clinical characteristics, examining 63 common laboratory biomarkers. Additional lab-specific cohorts were matched with an additional criterion of baseline biomarker values. Differences in biomarkers over a 12-month follow-up were analyzed using standardized mean difference-in-differences. RESULTS: The general cohort included 361,061 matched pairs, with 26M laboratory results. The effects on most biomarkers lasted 1-4 months and were consistent with anticipated changes after acute viral infections. Some biomarkers presented prolonged effects, consistent across the general and lab-specific cohorts. One group of such findings included a 7-8 month decrease in WBC counts, mainly driven by decreased counts of neutrophils, monocytes, and basophils. Potassium levels were decreased for 3-5 months. Vaccinated individuals' data suggested potentially smaller effects on WBCs, but cohort sizes limited this analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study explores SARS-CoV-2 infection effects on common laboratory biomarkers, characterizing the direction and duration of these effects on the largest infected cohort to date. The effects of most biomarkers resolve in the first months following infection. The most notable longer-lasting effects involved the immune system. Further research is required to characterize the magnitude of these effects among specific individuals.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a chemokine receptor type 2 antagonist, DMX-200 (repagermanium), in combination with an angiotensin receptor blocker, candesartan, improves clinical outcomes in people with COVID-19. DESIGN: Prospective, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Ten acute care hospitals in India. PARTICIPANTS: Adults <65 years old intended for hospital admission with moderate/severe COVID-19 disease (respiratory rate ≥24 breaths per minute or oxygen saturation ≤93% on room air). INTERVENTION: DMX-200 120 mg two times per day, or placebo, on background of titratable candesartan commencing at 4 mg two times per day, for 28 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was COVID-19 disease severity on a modified WHO Clinical Progression Scale (WHO scale) on day 14. Secondary outcomes included the WHO scale at days 28, 60, 90 and 180; intensive care unit (ICU) admission, respiratory failure or death within 28 days; length of hospitalisation; and requirement for ventilatory support or dialysis. RESULTS: Between December 2021 and August 2022, 518 people were screened, with 49 randomised to DMX-200 or placebo on a background of candesartan. The study was terminated early due to recruitment barriers, including an external requirement to restrict enrolment to adults <65 years old, contributing to a 91% screen failure rate. The median WHO Clinical Progression Scale (WHO scale) score at day 14 for both groups was 1 (IQR 1-1), indicating most participants were discharged with no limitations on activities by this time. Formal comparison was not performed due to the small sample size. One participant receiving DMX-200 died of COVID-19 disease progression. No participants required ICU admission, ventilation or dialysis. Median length of hospitalisation in both groups was 6 days (IQR 6-7 days). WHO scale scores were similar at 28, 60, 90 and 180 days. CONCLUSION: Due to recruitment barriers, the study was unable to determine whether DMX-200 improves clinical outcomes in people with COVID-19. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05122182.
Asunto(s)
Bencimidazoles , Compuestos de Bifenilo , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Tetrazoles , Humanos , Masculino , Bencimidazoles/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Bifenilo/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Método Doble Ciego , Tetrazoles/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Estudios Prospectivos , COVID-19/mortalidad , Quimioterapia Combinada , Bloqueadores del Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/uso terapéutico , India , Resultado del Tratamiento , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
The innate and adaptive immune systems collaborate to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection, minimize the viral spread, and kill infected cells, ultimately leading to the resolution of the infection. The adaptive immune system develops a memory of previous encounters with the virus, providing enhanced responses when rechallenged by the same pathogen. Such immunological memory is the basis of vaccine function. Here, we review the current knowledge on the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination, focusing on the pivotal role of T cells in establishing protective immunity against the virus. After providing an overview of the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection, we describe the main features of SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, including cross-reactive T cells, generated in patients with different degrees of COVID-19 severity, and of Spike-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells induced by vaccines. Finally, we discuss T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 variants and hybrid immunity and conclude by highlighting possible strategies to improve the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Dental personnel are potentially exposed to pathogenic microorganisms, as well as to possible sources of infection. The same is true for dental students, for whom it is crucial to acquire knowledge on infection control and appropriate dental techniques during their training.
Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales , Descontaminación , Estudiantes de Odontología , Humanos , Descontaminación/métodos , Adhesión a Directriz , Control de Infección Dental/métodosRESUMEN
Despite that the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has been controlled, it has affected a large proportion of the population, raising some concerns about potential sequelae in men at reproductive age. To contribute to the clarification of this issue, we performed a retrospective study comparing semen parameters values before and after confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in a large cohort of infertile men, compared to a control group that did not undergo SARS-CoV-2 infection. Wilcoxon test on paired samples and general linear regression model showed that SARS-CoV-2 infection has a detrimental effect on semen volume values (p < 0.005). However, semen volume seems to be significantly lower only during the first spermatogenic cycle after SARS-COV-2 infection (p < 0.005) and mainly in unvaccinated patients (p < 0.05). In addition, we detected alterations in progressive motility in patients infected with the alpha SARS-COV-2 strain (p < 0.05). In conclusion, our results show that although SARS-CoV-2 has a small effect on semen volume and sperm motility in infertile men, depending on the infectious strain or vaccination status, pre-infection values of semen parameters appear to be restored over one spermatogenic cycle after infection.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infertilidad Masculina , SARS-CoV-2 , Análisis de Semen , Semen , Humanos , Masculino , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Infertilidad Masculina/virología , Infertilidad Masculina/fisiopatología , Infertilidad Masculina/etiología , Semen/virología , Motilidad EspermáticaRESUMEN
In the spring of 2020, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic presented a formidable challenge to national and global healthcare systems. Immunocompromised individuals or those with relevant pre-existing conditions were particularly at risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Thus, understanding the immunological processes in these patient groups is crucial for current research. This study aimed to investigate humoral immunity following vaccination and infection in liver transplant recipients. Humoral immunity analysis involved measuring IgG against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (anti-S IgG) and employing a surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT) for assessing the hACE2 receptor-binding inhibitory capacity of antibodies. The study revealed that humoral immunity post-vaccination is well established, with positive results for anti-S IgG in 92.9% of the total study cohort. Vaccinated and SARS-CoV-2-infected patients exhibited significantly higher anti-S IgG levels compared to vaccinated, non-infected patients (18,590 AU/mL vs. 2320 AU/mL, p < 0.001). Additionally, a significantly elevated receptor-binding inhibitory capacity was observed in the cPassTMTM sVNT (96.4% vs. 91.8%, p = 0.004). Furthermore, a substantial enhancement of anti-S IgG levels (p = 0.034) and receptor-binding inhibition capacity (p < 0.001) was observed with an increasing interval post-transplantation (up to 30 years), calculated by generalized linear model analysis. In summary, fully vaccinated liver transplant recipients exhibit robust humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2, which significantly intensifies following infection and with increasing time after transplantation. These findings should be considered for booster vaccination schemes for liver transplant recipients.
RESUMEN
Background: Infections of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) can cause long-term effects known as long COVID. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a clinical study as well as the efficacy and safety of traditional East Asian herbal medicines in alleviating fatigue and cognitive dysfunction in patients with long COVID. Methods: This prospective pilot study investigated the use of three types of herbal medicines, Bojungikgi-tang (BIT), Kyungok-go (KOG), and Cheonwangbosim-dan (CBD), for a 12-week period as potential treatments for fatigue and cognitive dysfunction in patients with long COVID. Forty-five patients with long COVID were recruited, and one of three drugs was given based on the patient's symptoms and pattern identification. The effect of herbal medications on fatigue and cognitive function outcomes was assessed over a 36-week period, with patient adherence closely monitored. Results: After 12 weeks of herbal drug administration, fatigue symptoms improved significantly across all groups, with treatment success rates of 80 %, 53.33 %, and 46.67 % in the BIT, KOG, and CBD groups, respectively. However, cognitive dysfunction symptoms showed less improvement, with treatment success rates of 40 %, 46.67 %, and 13.33 % in the BIT, KOG, and CBD groups, respectively. All adverse events reported were mild and unrelated to the medication. The study design was found to be feasible with high medication adherence. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the feasibility of conducting a clinical trial with three herbal medicines to treat long COVID symptoms like fatigue and cognitive dysfunction.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Persistent post-COVID conditions (PCCs) have become inevitable challenges for individuals who have survived COVID. The National Research Plan on Long COVID-19 underscores the priority of addressing post-COVID conditions (PCCs) within specific subgroups of the United States (US) population. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and factors associated with PCCs among stroke survivors in the US. METHOD: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we utilized the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2022 dataset. First, we identified respondents with a positive history of both COVID-19 and stroke. Subsequently, we categorized these respondents based on whether they experienced PCCs and conducted a comparative analysis of their characteristics. Additionally, our study included a comparison of our findings with those among individuals who have survived myocardial infarction (MI) and cancer. RESULTS: A total of 3999 stroke, 5406 MI, and 10551 cancer survivors were included. The estimated prevalence of PCCs among stroke survivors was 30.6 %, compared to 22.4 %, 29.2 %, and 24.6 % among non-stroke (p < 0.001), MI, and cancer survivors, respectively. Fatigue, dyspnea, and taste/smell loss were the most common primary symptoms. In multivariate regression analysis, female sex (adjusted odds ratio (aOR):1.62, 95 %CI:[1.17-2.24]), stroke-belt residence (aOR:1.67, 95 %CI: [1.13-2.46]), pulmonary disease (aOR:2.12, 95 %CI:[1.53-2.92]), and depression (aOR:1.55, 95 %CI: [1.1-2.2]) were independent factors associated with higher odds of PCCs among stroke survivors. Additionally, age above 64 years was associated with lower odds of PCCs (aOR:0.6, 95 %CI: [0.41-0.86]). CONCLUSION: Our study highlights a considerable prevalence of PCCs among stroke survivors, particularly among younger women and individuals with other chronic conditions.