Systemic treatment with a selective TNFR2 agonist alters the central and peripheral immune responses and transiently improves functional outcome after experimental ischemic stroke.

Ischemic stroke often leaves survivors with permanent disabilities and therapies aimed at limiting detrimental inflammation and improving functional outcome are still needed. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) levels increase rapidly after ischemic stroke, and while signaling through TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1) is primarily detrimental, TNFR2 signaling mainly has protective functions. We therefore investigated how systemic stimulation of TNFR2 with the TNFR2 agonist NewSTAR2 affects ischemic stroke in mice. We found that NewSTAR2 treatment induced changes in peripheral immune cell numbers and transiently affected microglial numbers and neuroinflammation. However, this was not sufficient to improve long-term functional outcome after stroke in mice.

Activation of TNF Receptor 2 Improves Synaptic Plasticity and Enhances Amyloid-ß Clearance in an Alzheimer's Disease Mouse Model with Humanized TNF Receptor 2.

BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) is a master cytokine involved in a variety of inflammatory and neurological diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). Therapies that block TNF-α proved ineffective as therapeutic for neurodegenerative diseases, which might be explained by the opposing functions of the two receptors of TNF (TNFRs): while TNFR1 stimulation mediates inflammatory and apoptotic pathways, activation of TNFR2 is related to neuroprotection. Despite the success of targeting TNFR2 in a transgenic AD mouse model, research that better mimics the human context is lacking. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate whether stimulation of TNFR2 with a TNFR2 agonist is effective in activating human TNFR2 and attenuating AD neuropathology in the J20xhuTNFR2-k/i mouse model. METHODS: Transgenic amyloid-ß (Aß)-overexpressing mice containing a human extracellular TNFR2 domain (J20xhuTNFR2-k/i) were treated with a TNFR2 agonist (NewStar2). After treatment, different behavioral tests and immunohistochemical analysis were performed to assess different parameters, such as cognitive functions, plaque deposition, synaptic plasticity, or microglial phagocytosis. RESULTS: Treatment with NewStar2 in J20xhuTNFR2-k/i mice resulted in a drastic decrease in plaque load and beta-secretase 1 (BACE-1) compared to controls. Moreover, TNFR2 stimulation increased microglial phagocytic activity, leading to enhanced Aß clearance. Finally, activation of TNFR2 rescued cognitive impairments and improved synaptic plasticity. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that activation of human TNFR2 ameliorates neuropathology and improves cognitive functions in an AD mouse model. Moreover, our study confirms that the J20xhuTNFR2-k/i mouse model is suitable for testing human TNFR2-specific compounds.

Sequential treatment with a TNFR2 agonist and a TNFR1 antagonist improves outcomes in a humanized mouse model for MS.

TNF signaling is an essential regulator of cellular homeostasis. Through its two receptors TNFR1 and TNFR2, soluble versus membrane-bound TNF enable cell death or survival in a variety of cell types. TNF-TNFRs signaling orchestrates important biological functions such as inflammation, neuronal activity as well as tissue de- and regeneration. TNF-TNFRs signaling is a therapeutic target for neurodegenerative diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS) and Alzheimer's disease (AD), but animal and clinical studies yielded conflicting findings. Here, we ask whether a sequential modulation of TNFR1 and TNFR2 signaling is beneficial in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), an experimental mouse model that recapitulates inflammatory and demyelinating aspects of MS. To this end, human TNFR1 antagonist and TNFR2 agonist were administered peripherally at different stages of disease development in TNFR-humanized mice. We found that stimulating TNFR2 before onset of symptoms leads to improved response to anti-TNFR1 therapeutic treatment. This sequential treatment was more effective in decreasing paralysis symptoms and demyelination, when compared to single treatments. Interestingly, the frequency of the different immune cell subsets is unaffected by TNFR modulation. Nevertheless, treatment with only a TNFR1 antagonist increases T-cell infiltration in the central nervous system (CNS) and B-cell cuffing at the perivascular sites, whereas a TNFR2 agonist promotes Treg CNS accumulation. Our findings highlight the complicated nature of TNF signaling which requires a timely balance of selective activation and inhibition of TNFRs in order to exert therapeutic effects in the context of CNS autoimmunity.

A TNF receptor 2 agonist ameliorates neuropathology and improves cognition in an Alzheimer's disease mouse model.

Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) is a pleiotropic, proinflammatory cytokine related to different neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). Although the linkage between increased TNF-α levels and AD is widely recognized, TNF-α-neutralizing therapies have failed to treat AD. Previous research has associated this with the antithetic functions of the two TNF receptors, TNF receptor 1, associated with inflammation and apoptosis, and TNF receptor 2 (TNFR2), associated with neuroprotection. In our study, we investigated the effects of specifically stimulating TNFR2 with a TNFR2 agonist (NewStar2) in a transgenic Aß-overexpressing mouse model of AD by administering NewStar2 in two different ways: centrally, via implantation of osmotic pumps, or systemically by intraperitoneal injections. We found that both centrally and systemically administered NewStar2 resulted in a drastic reduction in amyloid ß deposition and ß-secretase 1 expression levels. Moreover, activation of TNFR2 increased microglial and astrocytic activation and promoted the uptake and degradation of Aß. Finally, cognitive functions were also improved after NewStar2 treatment. Our results demonstrate that activation of TNFR2 mitigates Aß-induced cognitive deficits and neuropathology in an AD mouse model and indicates that TNFR2 stimulation might be a potential treatment for AD.

Fundamentally different roles of neuronal TNF receptors in CNS pathology: TNFR1 and IKKß promote microglial responses and tissue injury in demyelination while TNFR2 protects against excitotoxicity in mice.

BACKGROUND: During inflammatory demyelination, TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1) mediates detrimental proinflammatory effects of soluble TNF (solTNF), whereas TNFR2 mediates beneficial effects of transmembrane TNF (tmTNF) through oligodendroglia, microglia, and possibly other cell types. This model supports the use of selective inhibitors of solTNF/TNFR1 as anti-inflammatory drugs for central nervous system (CNS) diseases. A potential obstacle is the neuroprotective effect of solTNF pretreatment described in cultured neurons, but the relevance in vivo is unknown. METHODS: To address this question, we generated mice with neuron-specific depletion of TNFR1, TNFR2, or inhibitor of NF-κB kinase subunit ß (IKKß), a main downstream mediator of TNFR signaling, and applied experimental models of inflammatory demyelination and acute and preconditioning glutamate excitotoxicity. We also investigated the molecular and cellular requirements of solTNF neuroprotection by generating astrocyte-neuron co-cultures with different combinations of wild-type (WT) and TNF and TNFR knockout cells and measuring N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) excitotoxicity in vitro. RESULTS: Neither neuronal TNFR1 nor TNFR2 protected mice during inflammatory demyelination. In fact, both neuronal TNFR1 and neuronal IKKß promoted microglial responses and tissue injury, and TNFR1 was further required for oligodendrocyte loss and axonal damage in cuprizone-induced demyelination. In contrast, neuronal TNFR2 increased preconditioning protection in a kainic acid (KA) excitotoxicity model in mice and limited hippocampal neuron death. The protective effects of neuronal TNFR2 observed in vivo were further investigated in vitro. As previously described, pretreatment of astrocyte-neuron co-cultures with solTNF (and therefore TNFR1) protected them against NMDA excitotoxicity. However, protection was dependent on astrocyte, not neuronal TNFR1, on astrocyte tmTNF-neuronal TNFR2 interactions, and was reproduced by a TNFR2 agonist. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that neuronal TNF receptors perform fundamentally different roles in CNS pathology in vivo, with neuronal TNFR1 and IKKß promoting microglial inflammation and neurotoxicity in demyelination, and neuronal TNFR2 mediating neuroprotection in excitotoxicity. They also reveal that previously described neuroprotective effects of solTNF against glutamate excitotoxicity in vitro are indirect and mediated via astrocyte tmTNF-neuron TNFR2 interactions. These results consolidate the concept that selective inhibition of solTNF/TNFR1 with maintenance of TNFR2 function would have combined anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties required for safe treatment of CNS diseases.