Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor adherence and outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

AIMS: Whether medication adherence to angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) in real-world practice is associated with the reduced risk of all-cause mortality or hospitalization relative to that with traditional renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade remains unclear. This study investigated the influence of medication adherence of ARNI and traditional RAS blockade in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHOD: We conducted a nationwide longitudinal cohort study with patients with HFrEF using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service data (2017-2021) covering the entire population. A total of 13 483 patients with HFrEF who received ARNI were matched 1:1 with 13 483 patients who received traditional RAS blockade using propensity score matching. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality or any hospitalization within one year. Medication adherence was assessed by calculating the proportion of days covered (PDC) relative to total medication prescribed. ARNI and traditional RAS blockade adherence rates were directly compared to analyse their respective associations with the primary outcome. RESULTS: Patients in the ARNI group had a lower rate of the primary outcome than those in the traditional RAS blockade group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-0.81; P < 0.001]. Mean PDC values spanning 1 year were 92.6 ± 14.5% and 90.9 ± 17.7% in the ARNI and RAS blockade groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Among patients with PDC ≥ 80%, the risk of primary outcome was significantly lower in the ARNI group than in the RAS blockade group (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.72-0.78; P < 0.001) while a risk reduction with ARNI was not observed among patients with PDC < 80% (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.85-1.05; P = 0.313). The beneficial effect was more pronounced among patients with PDC ≥ 80% than that among patients with PDC < 80% (P for interaction <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world cohort with HFrEF, ARNI was superior to traditional RAS blockade in reducing the risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization. The benefit of ARNI was pronounced among patients with high medication adherence but not among those with low medication adherence, highlighting the importance of adherence to ARNI treatment for HFrEF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PARADE-HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05329727.

Potential Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on the Cardio-ankle Vascular Index in Hypertensive Patients.

Objective Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) have been widely used as a treatment for heart failure. However, they have only been approved for the treatment of hypertension in a limited number of countries. We investigated the effect of ARNIs on arterial stiffness using the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) in patients with hypertension to reveal the mechanism underlying cardiovascular interaction. Methods We investigated the utility of ARNIs in patients in whom arterial stiffness was assessed using the CAVI before and after ARNI administration. Patients In this retrospective observational study, we enrolled 50 patients with hypertension treated with ARNIs between January 2021 and 2023. Forty-eight of the 50 patients (96%) were switched from angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) due to inadequate antihypertensive control. Results The systolic blood pressure (BP), diastolic BP, and CAVI were significantly decreased by ARNI administration (systolic BP: 145 [135, 162] to 131 [123, 143] mmHg [p=0.000]; diastolic BP: 92 [78, 100] to 82 [74, 89] mmHg [p=0.000]; and CAVI: 9.9 [9.1, 10.5] to 9.5 [8.8, 10.2] mmHg [p=0.005], respectively). Conclusion Hypertension treatment with ARNIs may improve not only the blood pressure but also the CAVI, reducing the afterload on the heart.

Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Allisartan for the Treatment of Primary Hypertension.

Background: The prevalence of hypertension still increases with the very rapidly increasing longevity in some countries, such as China. The control rate remains low. Objectives: This randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study assessed the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/allisartan, compared with olmesartan in Chinese patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Methods: Eligible patients aged 18 to 75 years (n = 1,197) with mild-to-moderate hypertension were randomized to receive sacubitril/allisartan 240 mg (n = 399), sacubitril/allisartan 480 mg (n = 399), or olmesartan 20 mg (n = 399) once daily for 12 weeks. Patients who completed the 12-week treatment then received another 12-week extended treatment (n = 1,084) and 28-week prolonged treatment (n = 189). The primary end point was a reduction in clinic mean sitting systolic blood pressure (msSBP) from baseline at 12 weeks. Results: Sacubitril/allisartan 240 mg/d provided a greater reduction in msSBP than olmesartan at 12 weeks (between-group difference: -1.9 mm Hg [95% CI: -4.2 to 0.4 mm Hg]; P = 0.0007, for noninferiority). Sacubitril/allisartan 480 mg/d provided a significantly greater reduction in msSBP than olmesartan at 12 weeks (between-treatment difference: -5.0 mm Hg [95% CI: -7.3 to -2.8 mm Hg]; P < 0.001, for superiority). Greater reductions in 24-hour, and daytime and nighttime systolic and diastolic blood pressure were also observed with both doses of sacubitril/allisartan compared with olmesartan (P ≤ 0.001 for 480 mg/d). The blood pressure reductions tended to be dose-dependent for sacubitril/allisartan. Sacubitril/allisartan was well tolerated, and no cases of angioedema or death were reported. Conclusions: Sacubitril/allisartan is effective for the treatment of hypertension and well tolerated in Chinese patients.

Glomerular pressure and tubular oxygen supply: a critical dual target for renal protection.

The primary treatment goal of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is preserving renal function and preventing its progression to end-stage renal disease. Glomerular hypertension and tubular hypoxia are critical risk factors in CKD progression. However, the renal hemodynamics make it difficult to avoid both factors due to the existence of peritubular capillaries that supply oxygen to the renal tubules downstream from the glomerulus through the efferent arteriole. In the treatment strategies for balancing glomerular pressure and tubular oxygen supply, afferent and efferent arterioles of the glomerulus determine glomerular filtration rate and blood flow to the peritubular capillaries. Therefore, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors as well as classical renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, which can change the diameter of afferent and/or efferent arterioles, are promising options for balancing this dual target and achieving renal protection. This review focuses on the clinical importance of glomerular pressure and tubular oxygen supply and proposes an effective treatment modality for this dual target.

Sacubitril/valsartan reduces proteinuria depending on blood pressure in patients with stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP) control is an important factor in the management of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Several studies have shown that BP in many patients with CKD remained uncontrolled even with multiple medications. Sacubitril/valsartan, an angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), has been newly approved for treating hypertension in Japan. However, the renoprotective effects remain unclear, particularly in patients with advanced CKD. Here, we investigated the effects on proteinuria of this ARNI in patients with stage 4-5 CKD. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from outpatients with stage 4-5 CKD who started ARNI from January until December 2023. The primary outcome was the change in urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) at 6 months after ARNI initiation. Secondary outcomes were systolic and diastolic BP, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), serum potassium, and serum uric acid (UA). We analyzed factors associated with 50% UPCR reduction by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: In total, 47 patients were analyzed. ARNI reduced UPCR from 2.14 g/gCr (interquartile range; 1.09-2.91) to 1.05 g/gCr (0.42-1.95; p < 0.001). Systolic BP fell from 150.0 mmHg (139.5-160.0) to 134.0 mmHg (124.5-140.0; p < 0.001). No significant changes in eGFR, serum potassium, and serum uric acid were observed, except for a slight decrease in eGFR among patients with conversion from a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor to ARNI. In multivariate regression analysis, higher systolic BP (per 10-mmHg increase) was significantly associated with reduced proteinuria (odds ratio 2.51, 95% confidence interval 1.35-4.66; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: ARNI reduced proteinuria in patients with stage 4-5 CKD, particularly for those with uncontrolled hypertension.

Plasma renin activity as a marker for predicting the antihypertensive effect of switching to sacubitril/valsartan in treated hypertensive patients: Usefulness in daily clinical practice.

The authors investigated the antihypertensive effect of sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) when switching from other drugs and assessed whether brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or plasma renin activity (PRA) before drug switching was a predictor of blood pressure lowering after switching to Sac/Val. In 92 patients with treated hypertension, clinic blood pressure, plasma BNP, and PRA were examined before and after switching to Sac/Val. Clinic systolic and diastolic blood pressures significantly decreased after drug switching to Sac/Val (p < .0001, respectively). The level before drug switching of BNP had no correlation with the change in systolic blood pressure (Δ-SBP) before and after switching to Sac/Val, but that of PRA was significantly correlated with Δ-SBP (r = .3807, p = .0002). A multiple regression analysis revealed that PRA before drug switching was an independent determinant of Δ-SBP. Our findings suggest that low PRA may become a useful marker to predict the antihypertensive effect of switching to Sac/Val in treated hypertensive patients.

Efficacy and safety of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition in heart failure patients with end-stage kidney disease on maintenance dialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) has played an increasingly important role in the management of heart failure (HF). However, the evidence on the benefits of ARNI in HF patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing dialysis is limited. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of ARNI in patients with concomitant HF and ESKD on maintenance dialysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We systematically searched the MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for studies reporting outcomes after ARNI treatment in HF patients with ESKD on dialysis. All meta-analyses were performed using the random effects model. Twenty-six studies comprising 2494 patients with concomitant HF and ESKD undergoing dialysis were included. Our synthesis showed a significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between before and after ARNI treatment (mean change: 8.05%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.57-10.54). Compared to the conventional group, the ARNI group showed a greater improvement in LVEF (mean difference: 4.03%; 95% CI 2.90-5.16). This effect was more pronounced in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (pinteraction < 0.0001). Patients treated with ARNI had a lower risk of all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.64; 95% CI 0.45-0.92; p = 0.01) but had a similar rate of HF hospitalization (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.43-1.18; p = 0.19). ARNI treatment showed benefits in the improvement of left ventricular end-systolic diameter, left ventricular mass index, left atrial diameter, and E/e' ratio (p < 0.05), while it did not significantly increase the risk of severe hyperkalaemia (p = 0.33) or symptomatic hypotension (p = 0.53). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis provided insights into the benefits of ARNI in HF patients with ESKD undergoing dialysis by improving left ventricular function, reversing left ventricular remodelling, and reducing the risk of all-cause mortality, without increasing the risk of HF hospitalizations, severe hyperkalaemia, and symptomatic hypotension.

Safety and efficacy of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor in improving cardiac function and blood pressure in dialysis patients.

Background: The efficacy of the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan (SV) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been established. Two meta-analyses have demonstrated its significant role in enhancing ventricular remodeling. However, the effectiveness and safety of its use in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) remain unclear. Methods and results: Up to October 2023, we searched the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases for studies involving ESRD patients treated with ARNI. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Effect sizes were reported as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We included 10 studies, encompassing 649 patients. ARNI was associated with improvements in blood pressure and left ventricular (LV) function in ESRD patients, including systolic blood pressure (SBP) (MD -12.76 mmHg; 95% CI, -18.03 to -7.5 mmHg), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (MD -6.41 mmHg; 95% CI, -8.10 to -4.72 mmHg), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (MD, 4.61%; 95% CI, 1.78%-7.44%). Hemoglobin levels improved, but there were no significant statistical differences in other biomarkers for dialysis. Sacubitril/valsartan was generally well tolerated in ESRD patients. Improved indices of left ventricular function were noted at 6 months and were more pronounced at 12 months. A linear relationship between LVEF and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) was observed, as indicated by a high correlation coefficient (r-value). Conclusion: ARNI effectively reduces blood pressure and enhances left ventricular function in dialysis patients, with early treatment associated with greater benefits. ARNI also demonstrates a favorable safety profile in this population. Further prospective studies are required to fully understand the long-term efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in dialysis patients.

Modern heart failure treatment is superior to conventional treatment across the left ventricular ejection spectrum: real-life data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry 2013-2020.

OBJECTIVES: This study is aimed to compare the effectiveness of modern therapy including angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) with conventional heart failure treatment in the real world. BACKGROUND: Since ARNI and SGLT2i were introduced to treat heart failure (HF), its therapeutic regimen has modernized from previous treatment with beta-blocker (BB) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) as added-on in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, a comparison between conventional and modern treatment strategies with drugs in combination has not been performed. METHODS: This observational study (2013-2020), using the Swedish HF Registry, involved 20,849 HF patients. Patients received either conventional (BB, ACEi/ARB, with/without MRA, n = 20,140) or modern (BB, ACEi/ARB, MRA, SGLT2i or BB, ARNI, MRA with/without SGLT2i, n = 709) treatment at the index visit. The endpoints were all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality. RESULTS: Modern HF therapy was associated with a significant 28% reduction in all-cause mortality (adjusted HR [aHR], 0.72 (0.54-0.96); p = 0.024) and a significant 62% reduction in CV mortality (aHR, 0.38 (0.21-0.68); p = 0.0013) compared to conventional HF treatment. Similar results emerged in a sensitivity analysis using propensity score matching. The interaction analyses did not reveal any trends for EF (< 40% and ≥ 40%), sex, age (< 70 and ≥ 70 years), eGFR (< 60 and ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2), and etiology of HF subgroups. CONCLUSION: In this nationwide study, modern HF therapy was associated with significantly reduced all-cause and CV mortality, regardless of EF, sex, age, eGFR, and etiology of HF.

Embracing an era of targeted combination therapy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

The concept of quadruple therapy as a "one-size-fit-all" approach is effective among all eligible patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, with consistent and significant clinical benefits including reduced mortality across various subgroups. However, with exception of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, the consistency of benefit with therapies does not extend to patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. The clinical benefits of other promising medical therapies, such as angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, have been demonstrated only in certain phenotypes of the highly heterogenous heart failure with preserved ejection fraction population. This variability can confuse frontline practicing cardiologists, potentially leading to the under-implementation of these medications. Therefore, we propose a simple approach: "targeted" combination therapy. This strategy aims to optimize evidence-based medications in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction by tailoring treatments to specific subgroups within the heart failure with preserved ejection fraction population where significant benefits are most evident.

Trajectories of Sacubitril/Valsartan Adherence Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Heart Failure.

Background: Sacubitril/valsartan, an angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi), improves heart failure (HF) outcomes, yet real-world adherence patterns are not well understood. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyze longitudinal patterns of adherence to ARNis in patients with HF and to identify factors associated with adherence patterns. Methods: Using Medicare beneficiaries from 2015 to 2018, we included patients diagnosed with HF who initiated an ARNi. A group-based trajectory model was constructed to identify adherence patterns during follow-up. We used multivariable logistic regression to investigate factors associated with membership in each adherence trajectory group. Results: Among 9,475 eligible beneficiaries (age 77 ± 7 years, 34% female), we identified 5 distinct ARNi adherence trajectories, characterized as: immediate discontinuers, who discontinued treatment within the first 3 months (12%); early discontinuers, who discontinued treatment in months 4 to 7 (10%); late discontinuers, who discontinued treatment in months 7 to 10 (12%); intermittently adherent patients (12%); and consistently adherent patients (54%). The first 4 groups were collectively categorized as nonconsistent adherents. Living in a socioeconomically disadvantaged area, ie, a county with the top 20% of Area Deprivation Index (adjusted OR [aOR]: 1.12 [95% CI: 1.00-1.24]) and Black race (aOR: 1.36, [95% CI: 1.18-1.56]) were associated with a higher likelihood of being nonconsistently adherent. Receiving prescriptions from a cardiologist (aOR: 0.64 [95% CI: 0.57-0.73]) was associated with a lower likelihood of suboptimal ARNi adherence. Conclusions: Half of ARNi users were not consistently adherent to the drug in the first year after treatment initiation. There exist significant racial and socioeconomic inequities in longitudinal adherence to ARNi.

Pseudo-nephropathy and hyper-excretion of urinary C-peptide: an overlooked adverse effect of an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI).

Sacubitril/valsartan, which is a combined angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), is used for the treatment of chronic heart failure and hypertension. Substrates of neprilysin are numerous, and the systemic effects of an ARNI remain to be determined. Increased urinary C-peptide (UCPR) and urinary albumin (UAlb) excretion has been reported with the use of an ARNI, but the mechanism is still unknown. We report an 84-year-old man with type 2 diabetes and hypertension. His UAlb and UCPR excretion and (to a lesser degree) the estimated glomerular filtration rate were increased after ARNI administration. They returned to basal levels after discontinuing ARNI administration. There was little or no change in glycemic control. Therefore, increased glomerular permeability and filtration could partially explain how neprilysin inhibition led to an elevation in UCPR excretion, in addition to other mechanisms, such as impairment of the renal ability to degrade C-peptide. Physicians must be cautious when interpreting the insulin secretion capability by UCPR and nephropathy by UAlb in ARNI-treated patients with diabetes.

Clinical Benefit of Sacubitril/Valsartan for Hypertensive Patients in Daily Practice and Predictors of Its Antihypertensive Effect.

Background: The blood pressure (BP)-lowering effect of sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) is greater than that of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) but in in real-world clinical practice, Sac/Val is used in a variety of patterns other than switching from ARBs. In the present study we investigated the effects of Sac/Val on BP and biochemical parameters when switching from or adding it to various antihypertensive drugs and examined what factors could be predictors of the antihypertensive effect of Sac/Val. Methods and Results: In 108 hypertensive patients treated with antihypertensive agents (including 4 naïve cases), clinic BP and various biochemical parameters were assessed before and after switching to/adding Sac/Val (200 mg/day). Systolic and diastolic BPs significantly decreased after treatment with Sac/Val (P<0.0001, respectively). As for biochemical parameters, alanine aminotransferase, triglycerides, C-reactive protein, and uric acid significantly decreased after administration of Sac/Val, but renal function, B-type natriuretic peptide, and plasma renin activity (PRA) did not change before or after treatment with Sac/Val. Multiple regression analysis revealed that low PRA and high baseline systolic BP were independent determinants of systolic BP reduction after Sac/Val treatment. Conclusions: Sac/Val is beneficial for poorly controlled hypertension in daily clinical practice and low PRA may be a predictor of the antihypertensive effect of switching to/adding Sac/Val.

Status and timing of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor implementation in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: Data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry.

AIMS: We explored timing, settings and predictors of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) initiation in a large, nationwide cohort of patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with HFrEF (ejection fraction <40%) registered in the Swedish HF Registry in 2017-2021 and naïve to ARNI were evaluated for timing and location of, and their characteristics at ARNI initiation. ARNI use increased from 8.3% in 2017 to 26.7% in 2021. Among 3892 hospitalized patients, 8% initiated ARNI in-hospital or ≤14 days after discharge, 4% between 15 and 90 days, and 88% >90 days after discharge or never initiated. Factors associated with earlier initiation included follow-up in specialized HF care, more severe HF, previous HF treatment use and higher income, whereas older age, higher comorbidity burden and living alone were associated with later/no initiation. Of 16 486 HFrEF patients, 8.1% inpatients and 5.9% outpatients initiated an ARNI at the index date. Factors associated with initiation in outpatients were overall consistent with those linked with an in-hospital/earlier ARNI initiation; 4.9% of 10 209 with HF duration <6 months and 9.1% of 5877 with HF duration ≥6 months initiated ARNI. Predictors of ARNI initiation in HF duration <6 months were inpatient status, lower ejection fraction, hypertension, whereas previous angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker use was associated with less likely initiation. Discontinuation at 1 year ranged between 13% and 20% across the above-reported analyses. CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital and early initiation of ARNI are limited in real-world care but still slightly more likely than in outpatients. ARNI were more likely initiated in patients with more severe HF, which might suggest its use as a second-line treatment and only following worsening of clinical status. One-year discontinuation rates were consistent regardless of the timing/setting of ARNI initiation.

Effects of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor on ketone body metabolism in pre-heart failure/heart failure patients.

Recently, a mild elevation of the blood ketone levels was found to exert multifaceted cardioprotective effects. To investigate the effect of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) on the blood ketone body levels, 46 stable pre-heart failure (HF)/HF patients were studied, including 23 who switched from angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) to ARNIs (ARNI group) and 23 who continued treatment with ACE inhibitors or ARBs (control group). At baseline, there were no significant differences in the total ketone body (TKB) levels between the two groups. Three months later, the TKB levels in the ARNI group were higher than the baseline values (baseline to 3 months: 71 [51, 122] to 92 [61, 270] µmol/L, P < 0.01). In the control group, no significant change was observed between the baseline and 3 months later. A multiple regression analysis demonstrated that the initiation of ARNI and an increase in the blood non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) levels at 3 months increased the percentage changes in the TKB levels from baseline to 3 months (%ΔTKB level) (initiation of ARNI: P = 0.017, NEFA level at 3 months: P < 0.001). These results indicate that ARNI administration induces a mild elevation of the blood TKB levels in pre-HF/HF patients.

Acute changes in kidney function and outcomes following an acute myocardial infarction: Insights from PARADISE-MI.

AIMS: Pharmacologic blockade of neurohormonal pathways in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) can result in acute changes in biomarkers of kidney function. We evaluated the effect of sacubitril/valsartan versus ramipril on initial changes in serum creatinine and the association of these changes with longer-term outcomes among participants in PARADISE-MI. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, event-driven trial, 5661 patients with an acute MI were assigned to receive sacubitril/valsartan or ramipril, with no run-in. The frequency of an initial pre-specified increase in serum creatinine (≥26.5 or ≥44 µmol/L) from baseline to week 1 was compared between arms. Multivariable Cox regression models were fit to examine the association of acute changes in serum creatinine with the primary cardiovascular composite outcome (cardiovascular death, first heart failure hospitalization, or outpatient heart failure), all-cause mortality, and longer-term changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). An initial increase in serum creatinine ≥26.5 µmol/L occurred in 155 of 2604 (6.0%) patients assigned to sacubitril/valsartan and 120 of 2603 (4.6%) patients assigned to ramipril (odds ratio [OR] 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.68). The corresponding numbers for an increase ≥44 µmol/L were 57 (2.2%) and 42 (1.6%), respectively (OR 1.37; 95% CI 0.92-2.05). A higher odds of increased serum creatinine ≥26.5 and ≥44 µmol/L for sacubitril/valsartan versus ramipril appeared to be restricted to patients who had a greater decline in systolic blood pressure over the same period (p-interaction = 0.05 and 0.001, respectively). In multivariable analyses, neither an acute increase in serum creatinine ≥26.5 or ≥44 µmol/L was associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular outcomes, all-cause mortality, or differences in longer-term eGFR slope. Findings were similar across the randomized treatment arms (p-interaction >0.6 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Following acute MI, patients assigned to sacubitril/valsartan had a higher frequency of initial increases in serum creatinine at 1 week, compared with ramipril. In adjusted models, initial increases in serum creatinine with either treatment were not associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes or changes in longer-term kidney function.

The contemporary role of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) in the management of heart failure: State-of-the-art review.

Novel therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), etc. The purpose of this review is to determine the effects of ARNI and SGLT2i in heart failure (HF), compare the impact of SGLT2i with ARNI, and finally evaluate the current data regarding the combination of these two drugs in HF. Various trials on the respective medications have shown some significant reduction in all-cause mortality and cardiovascular (CV) death. The combination of these drugs has shown more CV benefits than monotherapy. There is emerging data about these two drugs in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). At present, there are less head-to-head comparison trials of these two drugs. This review provides insights on the current evidence, comparative efficacy, and combination therapy of ARNI and SGLT2i in managing HF, focussing on HFrEF and HFpEF.

Study on the Effects of Angiotensin Receptor/Neprilysin Inhibitors on Renal Haemodynamics in Healthy Dogs.

An angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), a heart failure treatment, is a combination drug made up of sacubitril, a neprilysin inhibitor, and valsartan, a vascular receptor blocker. No human or veterinary studies regarding the effect of ARNI on renal haemodynamics in the absence of cardiac or renal issues exist. Therefore, we investigated the effect of ARNI on renal haemodynamics in five healthy dogs. ARNI was administered to all five dogs at an oral dose of 20 mg/kg twice daily for 4 weeks. Renal haemodynamics were assessed on the day before ARNI administration (BL), on Day 7, and on Day 28. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) significantly increased on Day 28 compared to BL and Day 7, whereas renal plasma flow increased on Day 7 and Day 28 compared to BL. Systolic blood pressure significantly decreased between BL and Day 28. Plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) concentrations increased on Day 7 compared to BL. Additionally, ANP concentrations increased on Day 28 in three of the five dogs. Different ANP concentrations were observed in the remaining two dogs. Both urine output volume and heart rate remained relatively stable and did not exhibit significant change. In conclusion, ARNI may enhance renal haemodynamics in healthy dogs. ARNI could be a valuable drug for treating both heart and kidney disease in dogs.

Sacubitril/Valsartan in Patients With Heart Failure and Deterioration in eGFR to <30 mL/min/1.73 m2.

BACKGROUND: Sacubitril/valsartan is a foundational therapy for patients with heart failure. Although current U.S. Food and Drug Administration labeling does not provide guidance regarding initiation or continuation of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with worsening kidney function, guidelines identify estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 as a contraindication to therapy. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of continuing sacubitril/valsartan in patients with deterioration of kidney function below an eGFR of 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. METHODS: The association between a deterioration in eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2, efficacy and safety outcomes, and treatment with sacubitril/valsartan vs renin-angiotensin system inhibitor were evaluated using time updated Cox models in a post hoc parallel trial analyses of PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF. RESULTS: Among 8,346 randomized patients in PARADIGM-HF and 4,746 in PARAGON-HF, 691 (8.3%) and 613 (12.9%), respectively, had an eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 at least once in follow-up. Patients experiencing such deterioration were at higher risk of the primary outcome in both PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF. However, the incidence of the primary outcome remained lower with sacubitril/valsartan vs renin-angiotensin system inhibitor, regardless of deterioration in kidney function in both PARADIGM-HF (Pinteraction = 0.50) and PARAGON-HF (Pinteraction = 0.64). Rates of key safety outcomes were higher among patients experiencing eGFR deterioration; however, rates were similar between treatment groups including among those who remained on treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients experiencing deterioration of kidney function to a value below eGFR 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 faced high risk of cardiovascular and kidney disease outcomes. Continuation of sacubitril/valsartan was associated with persistent clinical benefit and no incremental safety risk. These data support continuation of sacubitril/valsartan for heart failure treatment even when eGFR declines below this threshold (PARADIGM-HF [Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure], NCT01035255; and PARAGON-HF [Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ARB Global Outcomes in HF with Preserved Ejection Fraction], NCT01920711).