Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Lung Transplant: Single-Center Cohort Study.

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) in lung transplant recipients (LuTRs) has high heterogeneity between centers. Our aim was to investigate retrospectively the approach to PAP in our center over a 20-year period (2002-2023), and its impact on early post-operative infections (EPOIs) after lung transplantation (LuT). Primary endpoint was diagnosis of EPOI, defined as any bacterial infection including donor-derived events diagnosed within 30 days from LuT. Main exposure variables were type of PAP (combination vs. monotherapy) and PAP duration. We enrolled 111 LuTRs. PAP consisted of single-agent or combination regimens in 26 (25.2%) and 85 (74.8%) LuTR. Median PAP duration was 10 days (IQR 6-13) days. Piperacillin/tazobactam was the most common agent used either as monotherapy (n = 21, 80.7%) or as combination with levofloxacin (n = 79, 92.9%). EPOIs were diagnosed in 30 (27%) patients. At multivariable analysis no advantages were found for combination regimens compared to single-agent PAP in preventing EPOI (OR: 1.57, 95% CI: 0.488-5.068, p:0.448). The impact of PAP duration on EPOIs development was investigated including duration of PAP ≤6 days as main exposure variables, without finding a significantly impact (OR:2.165, 95% CI: 0.596-7.863, p: 0.240). Our results suggest no advantages for combination regimens PAP in preventing EPOI in LuTR.

Interventional antibiotic treatment replacing antibiotic prophylaxis during allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is safe and leads to a reduction of antibiotic administration.

Patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) face an elevated risk of infection-related mortality, particularly during the pre-engraftment period. Although systemic antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is commonly employed during neutropenia, it is linked to disruptions in the intestinal microbiome, increasing the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), and colonization with multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria. In our retrospective analysis, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of an exclusively interventional antibiotic treatment (IAT) compared to SAP in adult alloHSCT patients. In comparison to SAP, IAT resulted in a significantly reduced duration of antibiotic therapy (24 vs. 18 days, p < 0.001), although the cumulative incidence (CI) of bloodstream infections (BSI) by day + 100 post-HSCT was significantly higher in the IAT group compared to SAP (40% vs. 13%, p < 0.001). However, this did not lead to a significant increase in ICU transfers (13% vs. 6%, p = ns) or a higher CI of non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 3 years (11% vs. 10%, p = ns). With a median follow-up of 1052 days, the 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 69% and 66% for the SAP and IAT cohorts, respectively (p = ns). The CI of acute GVHD grade II-IV (30% vs. 39%) at 100 days or chronic GVHD of any grade (50% vs. 45%) at 3 years did not differ significantly between the SAP and IAT groups. There was a tendency towards a higher CI of severe chronic GVHD in the SAP cohort (28% vs. 13%, p = 0.08). Our single center experience in conducting alloHSCT without antibiotic prophylaxis but with stringent guidelines for prompt antibiotic intervention demonstrated no disadvantages in terms of OS and NRM. IAT led to significantly reduced consumption of cefotaxime, carbapenem, and glycopeptide antibiotics. In conclusion, our findings suggest that replacing SAP with the proposed IAT procedure is both safe and feasible.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of surgical site infections following colorectal surgery: protocol for network meta-analysis of randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections continue to be a significant challenge following colorectal surgery. These can result in extended hospital stays, hospital readmissions, increased treatment costs, and negative effects on patients' quality of life. Antibiotic prophylaxis plays a crucial role in preventing infection during surgery, specifically in preventing surgical site infections after colorectal surgery in adult patients. However, the optimal antibiotic regimen is still unclear based on current evidence. Considering the limitations of existing reviews, our goal is to conduct a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the comparative benefits and harms of available antibiotic prophylaxis regimens for preventing surgical site infections following colorectal surgery in adult patients. METHODS: We will search the Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases to identify relevant randomized controlled trials. We will include trials that (1) enrolled adults who underwent colorectal surgeries and (2) randomized them to any systemic administration of antibiotic (single or combined) prophylaxis before surgery compared to an alternative systemic antibiotic (single or combined antibiotic), placebo, control, or no prophylactic treatment. Pairs of reviewers will independently assess the risk of bias among eligible trials using a modified Cochrane risk of bias instrument for randomized trials. Our outcomes of interest include the rate of surgical site infection within 30 days of surgery, hospital length of stay, 30-day mortality, and treatment-related adverse effects. We will perform a contrast-based network meta-analysis using a frequentist random-effects model assuming a common heterogeneity parameter. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach will be utilized to assess the certainty of evidence for treatment effects. DISCUSSION: By synthesizing evidence from available RCTs, this study will provide valuable insight for clinicians, patients, and health policymakers on the most effective antibiotics for preventing surgical site infection. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023434544.

A Comprehensive Case Report Emphasizing the Role of Caesarean Section, Antibiotic Prophylaxis, and Post-operative Care in Meconium-Stained Fetal Distress Syndrome.

Meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) presents a complex medical scenario with significant implications for maternal and neonatal health. This case report explores the intricacies surrounding MSAF, focusing on its diagnosis, treatment, and the associated meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS). The report emphasizes the critical role of antibiotic prophylaxis in lower segment cesarean sections (LSCS) in balancing infection prevention in the mother with neonatal considerations. Additionally, it highlights personalized pain management and post-operative care regimens, contributing to a comprehensive strategy for maternal and neonatal well-being. A 27-year-old primigravida (primi) underwent a cesarean section due to the presence of meconium in the amniotic fluid, indicating fetal distress. The report meticulously documents vital signs, laboratory findings, and the timeline of events. The case report underscores the importance of diagnosing and treating MAS, offering valuable insights into management strategies and their impact on maternal and neonatal health. This case report emphasizes the critical role of antibiotic prophylaxis in LSCS to prevent maternal infection while considering neonatal well-being. The personalized pain management approach and post-operative care regimens contribute significantly to a comprehensive strategy for maternal and neonatal well-being. The findings provide valuable insights into diagnosing and treating MAS, highlighting the importance of timely intervention in similar clinical scenarios.

Prophylactic antibiotics for excision of premalignant vulvar lesions: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

No prospective data have been described to inform guidelines on antibiotic prophylaxis for partial vulvectomies. Thus, we conducted a single-center, pilot, double-blind randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics to prevent wound complications after partial vulvectomies. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to preoperative antibiotics or no preoperative antibiotics. The primary outcome of 30-day postoperative wound complications occurred in 31 (62 %) of all patients, with no differences between groups. The most common wound complications were superficial separation (54.2 % antibiotic prophylaxis vs. 65.3 % no prophylaxis, p = 0.37) and surgical site infection (0 % antibiotic prophylaxis vs 7.7 % no prophylaxis, p = 0.49). However, this study was limited by differences in patient characteristics between the groups. This study provides data to perform power calculations for a trial examining the effect of preoperative antibiotics on surgical site infection.

Prophylactic Antibiotics are Unnecessary for Routine CO2 Laser Burn Scar Treatment.

CO2 ablative fractional laser (CO2 AFL) therapy is a safe and effective procedure when used in the treatment of hypertrophic scars for burn patients. It has a high patient satisfaction rate and a minimal side effect profile, typically consisting of postoperative pain, irritation, surgical site inflammation, and, in rare cases, infection. Although prophylactic antibiotics have historically been recommended, there is a paucity of literature on the topic and recent studies indicate that they may be unnecessary in routine cases. In this retrospective, single center descriptive study, 230 cases in patients with hypertrophic burn scars treated with CO2 AFL therapy were compared. 28 cases were with the use of prophylactic antibiotics and 201 cases were without the use of prophylactic antibiotics. We found that there was no significant association between the use of antibiotics and the prevention of topical skin infection in cases treated with CO2 AFL therapy (p=1). Therefore, we conclude that the omission of prophylactic antibiotics is not associated with an increased risk of infection and recommend that prophylactic antibiotics should not be indicated in the setting of routine CO2 AFL therapy for patients with hypertrophic burn scars.

Right-sided infective endocarditis with ventricular septal defect.

Infective endocarditis (IE) affects the endothelium of the heart, with the heart valves most commonly involved. It has been documented that the annual incidence of infective endocarditis is 3-10 per 100,000 patient-years1. However, it can be underestimated since the incidence in developing countries cannot be determined accurately. Here, we present a case of a 37-year-old male who was referred from a local health facility with shortness of breath on presentation; the patient was anuric for one day and initial laboratory investigations showed metabolic acidosis, hyperkalemia, sepsis, and deranged renal function tests. The patient had received a three-week course of intravenous (IV) piperacillin-tazobactam at the previous health facility, being diagnosed as a case of infective endocarditis. An initial transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) showed vegetation on the pulmonary valve; however, the patient was neither an IV drug abuser nor did he have any history of implantation of intracardiac devices or central venous catheters. There was no recent or remote history of dental or surgical procedures. Due to the acute kidney injury, hemodialysis sessions and IV imipenem were started. As the patient's hemodynamic profile improved by the fifth day of admission, TTE was repeated, revealing a small ventricular septal defect (VSD). This case report highlights the importance of even small VSD that could potentially lead to right-sided IE. Surgical correction of VSD could prevent such a life-threatening condition.

Duration of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in neonatal surgery: Less is more.

BACKGROUND: The ideal duration of neonatal antibiotic prophylaxis is not determined with wide variance in practice. This study aims to evaluate the association between duration of antibiotics and surgical site infection (SSI) in neonatal surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review regarding antibiotic prophylaxis was performed on <30-day-old surgical patients at a children's hospital from 2014 to 2019. The patients were analyzed based on demographics, presence of SSI, and antibiotic duration. The primary outcome was the development of SSI with ANOVA, chi-square, and recursive partitioning used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: 19/155 patients developed an SSI (12.26 â€‹%). Those with an SSI had a lower weight at surgery (p â€‹= â€‹0.03). Additionally, wound classification (p â€‹= â€‹0.17) and antibiotic duration >48hrs (p â€‹= â€‹0.94) made no statistical difference in SSI rate. The two variables most closely linked to SSI development were gestational age (100 â€‹%) and weight at time of procedure (80.76 â€‹%). CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic prophylaxis >48 â€‹h did not decrease the incidence of SSI. Risk factors for SSI development in neonatal surgery were lower gestational age, decreased weight at time of procedure and total length of procedure.

[Perineal prostate biopsy]. / Perineale Prostatabiopsie.

The prostate biopsy is an essential tool for diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa). While transrectal biopsy (TR-Bx) continues to be considered the gold standard in Germany, the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines increasingly recommend transperineal biopsy (TP-Bx) due to lower infection rates and higher tumor detection rates. This article provides an overview of the history and development of the perineal biopsy, compares TR-Bx and TP-Bx and discusses the need for antibiotic prophylaxis before TP-Bx. Current studies have shown that TP-Bx can be performed without antibiotic prophylaxis and new techniques such as robotic-assisted and vector biopsy show very precise results. The establishment of TP-Bx is being promoted by extrabudgetary funding and technological advancements, with the choice of biopsy method remaining an individual decision jointly made in dialogue with the patient.

Update of the Spanish clinical practice guideline for urinary tract infection in infants and children. Summary of recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

The management of urinary tract infection (UTI) in infants and children has changed significantly over the past few decades based on scientific evidence that questioned the efficacy of strategies used to prevent kidney injury and subsequent progression to chronic kidney disease, which is very unlikely in most paediatric cases. However, there is still substantial heterogeneity in its management and uncertainty regarding the diagnosis, indication of imaging tests, treatment or follow-up in these patients. The Spanish clinical practice guideline has been updated through the review of the literature published since 2009 and a rigorous evaluation of current clinical practice aspects, taking into account the evidence on the benefits of each intervention in addition to its risks and drawbacks to attempt to provide more precise recommendations.

Successful prophylactic measures for the eradication of Staphylococcus aureus infections in elective hip primary and revision arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Staphylococcus aureus stands as the predominant etiological agent in postoperative acute prosthetic joint infections (PJI), contributing to 35-50% of reported cases. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dual prophylaxis incorporating cefuroxime and teicoplanin, in combination with nasal decolonization utilizing 70% alcohol, and oral and body lavage with chlorhexidine. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of electronic health records regarding primary and revision arthroplasties conducted at our institution from 2020 to 2021. Relevant variables linked to prosthetic joint infections (PJI) were documented until the latest follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 539 operations (447 primary arthroplasties and 92 revision arthroplasties) were performed on 519 patients. There were 11 cases of postoperative acute PJI, resulting in infection rates of 1.6% for primary arthroplasties and 4.3% for revision surgeries. Infections were more prevalent in male patients, individuals with an ASA classification>II, and those undergoing longer operations (>90min). S. aureus was not isolated in any of the cases. CONCLUSION: The prophylactic measures implemented in our institution have exhibited a high efficacy in preventing postoperative acute PJI caused by S. aureus.

Antibiotic utilization at an orthopedic inpatient department in a large governmental hospital in the north of the West Bank, Palestine; a retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Studies evaluating the patterns of antibiotic consumption are becoming increasingly necessary as a result of the increased use of antibiotics and development of antibiotic resistance globally. This study aimed to evaluate the use of antibiotics in in terms of both quantity and quality at the largest surgical hospital in the north of the West Bank, Palestine. METHODS: An observational retrospective study with a total population sampling method was conducted to collect data from the inpatients of the orthopedic departments of a large governmental hospital in the northern West Bank, Palestine. The data were collected from patients' files and evaluated using the anatomical therapeutic chemical and defined daily dose (ATC/DDD) methodology, and the drug utilization 90% (DU90%) index. The ATC/DDD methodology, designed by the World Health Organization (WHO), as a well-trusted and standardized tool that allows measuring and comparing antibiotic utilization across different contexts. Antibiotic prescriptions were classified using the World Health Organization Access, Watch and Reserve classification (WHO AWaRe). RESULTS: Of the 896 patients who were admitted to the hospital in the year 2020 and included in the study, 61.9% were males, and 38.1% were females. The percentage of patients who received antibiotics was 97.0%, and the overall antibiotic usage was 107.91 DDD/100 bed days. The most commonly prescribed antibiotic was cefazolin (50.30 DDD/100 bed days), followed by gentamicin (24.15 DDD/100 bed days) and ceftriaxone (17.35 DDD/100 bed days). The DU90% segment comprised four different agents. Classification of antibiotics according to the WHO AWaRe policy revealed that 75.9% of antibiotics were prescribed from the access list. CONCLUSION: This study comes as part of the efforts exerted to combat the growing problem of antibiotic resistance in Palestine. Our results showed that the consumption of antibacterial agents in the orthopedic unit at a large governmental hospital in Palestine was relatively high. The results of this study provide valuable insights for the decision-makers to create policies aimed at regulating antibiotic prescriptions. This study also aims to provide a look into the antibiotic prescription patterns, offering a clearer understanding of the current situation of antibiotic consumption in Palestine. It also emphasizes the need for antibiotic stewardship and surveillance programs.

Lower Rates of Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection in Patients on Hemodialysis Receiving Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Melioidosis Prophylaxis.

Hemodialysis is a risk factor for Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SAB). In this single-center study, SAB rates were 56% lower during the monsoonal wet season when patients on hemodialysis receive supervised melioidosis prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. This intervention may reduce SAB rates in high-risk patients; however, further targeted studies are required.

Preventive Antibiotic Use and Complications After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients Hospitalized for Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.

BACKGROUND: The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommends prophylactic antibiotics before endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). We assessed the impact of this approach on the incidence of post-ERCP outcomes using nationwide data. METHODS: Using 2015-2021 Nationwide Inpatient Sample data and relevant ICD-10 codes, we analyzed adult hospitalizations for PSC who underwent ERCP, with and without antibiotic prophylaxis. Hierarchical multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between prophylactic antibiotic use and post-ERCP complications including sepsis, acute cholangitis, and acute pancreatitis. RESULTS: We analyzed 32,972 hospitalizations for PSC involving ERCP, with 12,891 admissions (39.1%) receiving antibiotics before ERCP (cases) and 20,081 (60.9%) serving as controls. Cases were older than controls (mean age: 64.2 ± 8.6 vs. 61.3 ± 6.1 years; P = 0.020). Compared with controls, hospitalizations with antibiotic prophylaxis had a higher male population (7,541 (58.5%) vs. 11,265 (56.1%); P < 0.001) and higher comorbidity burden (Charlson comorbidity index score of ≥2: 5,867 (45.5%) of cases vs. 8,996 (44.8%) of controls; P = 0.01). Incidence of post-ERCP septicemia was 19.1% (6,275) with 2,935 incidences (22.8%) among cases compared with 3,340 (16.6%) among controls. Antibiotic prophylaxis did not significantly improve the odds of septicemia (aOR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.77 - 1.09; P = 0.179). Approximately 2,271 (6.9%) cases of acute cholangitis and 5,625 (17.1%) cases of acute post-ERCP pancreatitis were recorded. After adjustments for multiple variables, no significant difference was observed in the odds of cholangitis (aOR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.98 - 1.45; P = 0.08). However, antibiotic prophylaxis was correlated with a statistically significant reduction in the odds ratio of acute post-ERCP pancreatitis (aOR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.57 - 0.66; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of antibiotic prophylaxis in hospitalizations with PSC was correlated with a significant reduction in the odds of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Antibiotic prophylaxis did not improve the odds of post-ERCP sepsis or cholangitis. Prophylactic use of antibiotics should be individualized, considering both their anti-infective benefits and potential impact on the biochemical markers of liver disease.

The effect of antibiotic premedication on postoperative complications following dental extractions.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the association between antibiotic prophylaxis and adverse outcomes following tooth extraction within the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing dental extractions in 2015-2019. The primary exposure was antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary outcome was post-extraction complication within 7 days (e.g., alveolar osteitis and surgical site infection); the secondary outcome was subsequent medical care relating to a post-extraction oral complication within 7 days. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed the independent effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on each outcome. RESULTS: Of 385,880 visits with a dental extraction, 122,810 (31.8%) received antibiotic prophylaxis. Overall, 3387 (0.9%) experienced a post-extraction complication and 350 (0.09%) received medical care relating to a post-extraction oral complication within 7 days. In multivariable regression, diabetes was a statistically significant (p = 0.01) effect modifier of the association between antibiotic prophylaxis and post-extraction complication. Among visits for patients without diabetes, antibiotic prophylaxis was significantly associated with an increased odds of post-extraction complication (odds ratio [OR] = 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-1.38), but among visits for patients with diabetes no significant effect was observed (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.92-1.15). Antibiotic prophylaxis was not significantly associated with post-extraction medical care (OR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.83-1.30). CONCLUSIONS: In this large retrospective cohort, we observed no significant protective effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on post-extraction complications or subsequent medical care utilization in a setting with low complication rates. These data suggest that use of antibiotic prophylaxis in similar settings may need to be re-evaluated to minimize unnecessary antibiotic use.

ESCMID/EUCIC clinical guidelines on preoperative decolonization and targeted prophylaxis in patients colonized by multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria before surgery.

SCOPE: The aim of these guidelines is to provide recommendations on decolonization and perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) in multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria (MDR-GPB) adult carriers before inpatient surgery. METHODS: These European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID)/European Committee on Infection Control (EUCIC) guidelines were developed following the systematic review of published studies targeting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MR-CoNS) and pan-drug-resistant (PDR)-GPB. Critical outcomes were the occurrence of surgical site infections (SSIs) caused by the colonizing MDR-GPB and SSIs-attributable mortality. Important outcomes included the occurrence of SSIs caused by any pathogen, hospital-acquired infections, all-cause mortality, and adverse events associated with the interventions, including resistance development to the agents used and incidence of Clostridioides difficile infections. The last search of all databases was performed on November 1st, 2023. The level of evidence and strength of each recommendation were defined according to the GRADE approach. Consensus of a multidisciplinary expert panel was reached for the final list of recommendations. Antimicrobial stewardship considerations were included. RECOMMENDATIONS: The guideline panel reviewed the impact of decolonization, targeted PAP, and combined interventions (e.g., decolonization and targeted PAP) on the risk of SSIs and other outcomes in MDR-GPB carriers, according to the type of bacteria and type of surgery. We recommend screening for S. aureus (SA) before high-risk operations, such as cardiothoracic and orthopedic surgery. Decolonization with intranasal mupirocin with or without chlorhexidine bathing is recommended in patients colonized with SA before cardiothoracic and orthopedic surgery and suggested in other surgeries. Addition of vancomycin to standard prophylaxis is suggested for MRSA carriers in cardiothoracic surgery, orthopedic surgery, and neurosurgery. Combined interventions (e.g., decolonization and targeted prophylaxis) are suggested in MRSA carriers undergoing cardiothoracic and orthopedic surgery. No recommendation could be made regarding screening, decolonization, and targeted prophylaxis for VRE due to the lack of data. No evidence was retrieved for MR-CoNS and PDR-GPB. Careful consideration of the laboratory workload and involvement of antimicrobial stewardship as well as infection control teams are warranted before implementing screening procedures or performing changes in PAP policy. Future research should focus on novel decolonizing techniques, on the monitoring of resistance to decolonizing agents and PAP regimens, and on standardized combined interventions in high-quality studies.

Doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men and transgender women in Belgium: awareness, use and antimicrobial resistance concerns in a cross-sectional online survey.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the awareness, willingness to use and use of doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxyPEP) among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW) in Belgium. Additionally, we aimed to identify factors associated with doxyPEP use and concerns regarding antimicrobial resistance (AMR). METHODS: Cross-sectional online survey among MSM and TGW in Belgium in April 2024. Participants were recruited through sexual networking applications and social media of community-based organisations. Numerical variables were compared with Wilcoxon rank-sum test and categorical variables with χ2 or Fisher's exact tests. Factors associated with doxyPEP use were assessed using logistic regression. Willingness to use doxyPEP and concerns about side effects/AMR were assessed before and after presenting a brief paragraph on the potential effects of doxyPEP on AMR. RESULTS: 875 individuals initiated the survey. Almost all identified as men (860/875, 98.3%) with a median age of 40 years (IQR 32-48), 40.4% (n=352/875) had heard of doxyPEP and 9.4% (n=82/875) had used it, among whom the majority used it within the previous 6 months (70/81, 86.4%). In multivariable logistic regression, doxyPEP use was associated with reporting ≥1 sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the previous 12 months, engagement in chemsex, HIV status and pre-exposure prophylaxis use, and education level.About 80% of the participants initially reported being willing to use doxyPEP, and about 50% reported being concerned about side effects. After reading about the potential effects of doxyPEP on AMR, willingness to use decreased to 60% and concerns of side effects/AMR increased to around 70%. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 1 in 10 MSM in Belgium reported using doxyPEP. A recent history of STIs and STI risk factors were positively associated with doxyPEP use. Importantly, concerns about AMR and side effect influenced willingness to use doxyPEP. If doxyPEP is introduced, informing patients about doxyPEP benefits and risks is crucial to enable informed decision-making.

A NSQIP-Based Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Choice of Prophylactic Antibiotics for Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Surgical site infection is a common complication following pancreaticoduodenectomy and is a major source of postoperative morbidity. Surgical site infection is more common among patients who undergo preoperative biliary instrumentation, likely because of the introduction of intestinal flora into the normally sterile biliary tree. Frequently, bacterial isolates from surgical site infections after pancreaticoduodenectomy demonstrate resistance to the antibiotic agents typically used for surgical prophylaxis, suggesting that broad-spectrum coverage may be beneficial. This chapter summarizes the current evidence regarding surgical site infection following pancreatic surgery and describes the rationale and methodology underlying a multicenter randomized trial evaluating piperacillin-tazobactam compared with cefoxitin for surgical site infection prevention following pancreaticoduodenectomy. As the first U.S. randomized surgical trial to utilize a clinical registry for data collection, this study serves as proof of concept for registry-based clinical trials. The trial has successfully completed patient accrual, and study results are forthcoming.

Seasonal variation and preoperative risk factors for polymicrobial infection following open fracture.

Introduction: Despite modern approaches to open fracture management, fracture-related infection (FRI) rates remain high. Recent studies demonstrated the seasonal and regional variation of causative organisms in FRI. This study aims to better understand the causative organisms and identify preoperative risk factors for the primary outcome of FRIs at a Level I trauma center. Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study examined all patients that underwent irrigation and debridement of an open fracture at a single Level I trauma center between 2007 and 2019. Exclusion criteria included gunshot wounds, hand injuries, and follow-up less than 3 months. Patients that developed FRI were compared by season, injury characteristics, patient demographics, initial management, and causative organisms. Results: Among 695 patients with open fractures, 78 patients (11.2 %) developed infection, of which eight were Gustilo-Anderson (GA) Type I, 16 were GA Type II, 25 were GA Type IIIA, 26 were GA Type IIIB, and three were GA Type IIIC. Gram-positive FRIs were most common (81.1 %), followed by 56.8 % polymicrobial, 54.1 % gram-negative, and 10.1 % culture-negative infections. More than half (55.1 %) of the infections were from open tibial fractures and occurred after a motorcycle (32.1 %) or motor vehicle collision (23.1 %). Patients were more likely to have high FRI rates in the summer (12.8 %, n = 29) and fall (15.8 %, n = 32) in comparison of spring (4.7 %, n = 7) and winter (8.5 %, n = 10) (p < 0.01). Staphylococcus infections were more common in fall and winter (73.8 %, n = 31) versus spring and summer (44.4 %, n = 16) (p = 0.01). Patients that were transferred from outside hospitals had significantly higher rates of polymicrobial infection when compared to those who arrived from the field (63.6 % vs 41.2 %, p = 0.03). No differences were observed in infection causative organisms based on GA type. Conclusions: Two preoperative risk factors for polymicrobial infection following open fracture include inter-hospital transfers and warm/humid weather. Broadening antibiotic prophylaxis during spring/summer months or for transferred patients may enhance antibiotic coverage and reduce infections.