Mirtazapine blood levels and antidepressant response.

OBJECTIVE: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is an important tool for treatment optimisation. Its usefulness has recently been demonstrated for some first-line antidepressants; however, few studies have been reported on the relationship between blood levels of mirtazapine and its antidepressant effects. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between blood concentration of mirtazapine and antidepressant response. METHODS: 59 outpatients treated with mirtazapine for depression were recruited and followed up for three months in a naturalistic setting. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-21 (HAMD-21) was administered at baseline, month 1, and month 3 to assess antidepressant response. Mirtazapine serum concentration was measured at steady state. Linear regression analysis and nonlinear least-squares regression were used to estimate association between serum concentration of mirtazapine and antidepressant response. RESULTS: Our results showed no overall association between serum concentration of mirtazapine and symptom improvement at month 1 and month 3. A marginally significantly higher serum concentration of mirtazapine was found in responders vs non-responders at month 3. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that serum concentration of mirtazapine is not strongly associated with the antidepressant efficacy of mirtazapine. This is probably attributed to its pharmacodynamic profile, even though higher blood levels seem to be marginally more effective.

Mirtazapine plasma levels association with response is mild and do not follow the same curve of other antidepressantsMirtazapine higher plasma levels may show some benefit in a subgroup of patientsTherapeutic drug monitoring may help during antidepressant treatment.

Interaction Effect of Childhood Abuse History and Suicidality on 12-Month Antidepressant Response in Patients With Depressive Disorder.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify the individual and interactive effects of childhood abuse and suicidal ideation on antidepressant treatment response in 12 months. METHODS: In this prospective research, 1,262 depressive patients were asked about their childhood abuse history, suicidal ideation, and other clinical characteristics and socio-demographic features at baseline, and 1,015 of them were followed during 1 year of stepwise pharmacotherapy. The individual and interactive relationships of the childhood abuse history and suicidal ideation on 12-month antidepressant non-remission were explored by logistic regression with relevant covariates. RESULTS: Having a childhood abuse history and higher suicidal ideation significantly predicted a non-remission state in 12 months respectively. The interaction term of childhood abuse and suicidal ideation was also significantly related to a non-remission state at 12 months. To be specific, in the low suicidal ideation group, depressive patients with a childhood abuse history were more likely to be in a non-remission state after 12 months of medication. In the high suicidal ideation group, however, childhood abuse history was not significantly associated with the non-remission state at 12 months. CONCLUSION: The childhood abuse history and the level of suicidal ideation are informative factors predicting the long-term results of antidepressant treatment, especially when they are combined. Clinicians may consider antidepressants with a higher affinity for patients with childhood abuse history even if they don't have suicidal ideation. The cognitive intervention for suicidal ideation might be helpful in addition to pharmacological treatment.

Treatment response of venlafaxine induced alterations of gut microbiota and metabolites in a mouse model of depression.

Antidepressants remain the first-line treatment for depression. However, the factors influencing medication response are still unclear. Accumulating evidence implicates an association between alterations in gut microbiota and antidepressant response. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the role of the gut microbiota-brain axis in the treatment response of venlafaxine. After chronic social defeat stress and venlafaxine treatment, mice were divided into responders and non-responders groups. We compared the composition of gut microbiota using 16 S ribosomal RNA sequencing. Meanwhile, we quantified metabolomic alterations in serum and hippocampus, as well as hippocampal neurotransmitter levels using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. We found that the abundances of 29 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were significantly altered between the responders and non-responders groups. These ASVs belonged to 8 different families, particularly Muribaculaceae. Additionally, we identified 38 and 39 differential metabolites in serum and hippocampus between the responders and non-responders groups, respectively. Lipid, amino acid, and purine metabolisms were enriched in both serum and hippocampus. In hippocampus, the concentrations of tryptophan, phenylalanine, gamma-aminobutyric acid, glutamic acid, and glutamine were increased, while the level of succinic acid was decreased in the responders group, compared with the non-responders group. Our findings suggest that the gut microbiota may play a role in the antidepressant effect of venlafaxine by modulating metabolic processes in the central and peripheral tissues. This provides a novel microbial and metabolic framework for understanding the impact of the gut microbiota-brain axis on antidepressant response.

Electrophysiological predictors of early response to antidepressants in major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Psychomotor retardation (PMR) is a core feature of major depressive disorder (MDD), which is characterized by abnormalities in motor control and cognitive processes. PMR in MDD can predict a poor antidepressant response, suggesting that PMR may serve as a marker of the antidepressant response. However, the neuropathological relationship between treatment outcomes and PMR remains uncertain. Thus, this study examined electrophysiological biomarkers associated with poor antidepressant response in MDD. METHODS: A total of 142 subjects were enrolled in this study, including 49 healthy controls (HCs) and 93 MDD patients. All participants performed a simple right-hand visuomotor task during magnetoencephalography (MEG) scanning. Patients who exhibited at least a 50 % reduction in disorder severity at the endpoint (>2 weeks) were considered to be responders. Motor-related beta desynchronization (MRBD) and inter- and intra-hemispheric functional connectivity were measured in the bilateral motor network. RESULTS: An increased MRBD and decreased inter- and intra-hemispheric functional connectivity in the motor network during movement were observed in non-responders, relative to responders and HCs. This dysregulation predicted the potential antidepressant response. CONCLUSION: Abnormal local activity and functional connectivity in the motor network indicate poor psychomotor function, which might cause insensitivity to antidepressant treatment. This could be regarded as a potential neural mechanism for the prediction of a patient's treatment response.

The effect of antidepressant treatment on blood BDNF levels in depressed patients: A review and methodological recommendations for assessment of BDNF in blood.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent psychiatric disorder and a leading cause of disability worldwide. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a signaling protein responsible for promoting neuroplasticity, is highly expressed in the central nervous system but can also be found in the blood. Since impaired brain plasticity is considered a cornerstone in the pathophysiology of MDD, measurement of BDNF in blood has been proposed as a potential biomarker in MDD. The aim of our study is to systematically review the literature for the effects of antidepressant treatments on blood BDNF levels in MDD and the suitability of blood BDNF as a biomarker for depression severity and antidepressant response. We searched Pubmed® and Cochrane library up to March 2024 in a systematic manner using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). The search resulted in a total of 42 papers, of which 30 were included in this systematic review. Generally, we found that patients with untreated MDD have a lower blood BDNF level than healthy controls. Antidepressant treatments increase blood BDNF levels, and more evidently after pharmacological than non-pharmacological treatment. Neither baseline nor change in the blood BDNF level correlates with depression severity or treatment outcome, which undermines its use as a biomarker in MDD. Our review also highlights the importance of considering factors influencing the accuracy and reproducibility of BDNF measurements. We summarize considerations to help obtain more robust blood BDNF values and compile a list of recommendations to help streamline assessment of blood BDNF levels in future studies.

Hippocampal PACAP signaling activation triggers a rapid antidepressant response.

BACKGROUND: The development of ketamine-like rapid antidepressants holds promise for enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of depression, but the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms remain unclear. Implicated in depression regulation, the neuropeptide pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) is investigated here to examine its role in mediating the rapid antidepressant response. METHODS: The onset of antidepressant response was assessed through depression-related behavioral paradigms. The signaling mechanism of PACAP in the hippocampal dentate gyrus (DG) was evaluated by utilizing site-directed gene knockdown, pharmacological interventions, or optogenetic manipulations. Overall, 446 mice were used for behavioral and molecular signaling testing. Mice were divided into control or experimental groups randomly in each experiment, and the experimental manipulations included: chronic paroxetine treatments (4, 9, 14 d) or a single treatment of ketamine; social defeat or lipopolysaccharides-injection induced depression models; different doses of PACAP (0.4, 2, 4 ng/site; microinjected into the hippocampal DG); pharmacological intra-DG interventions (CALM and PACAP6-38); intra-DG viral-mediated PACAP RNAi; and opotogenetics using channelrhodopsins 2 (ChR2) or endoplasmic natronomonas halorhodopsine 3.0 (eNpHR3.0). Behavioral paradigms included novelty suppressed feeding test, tail suspension test, forced swimming test, and sucrose preference test. Western blotting, ELISA, or quantitative real-time PCR (RT-PCR) analysis were used to detect the expressions of proteins/peptides or genes in the hippocampus. RESULTS: Chronic administration of the slow-onset antidepressant paroxetine resulted in an increase in hippocampal PACAP expression, and intra-DG blockade of PACAP attenuated the onset of the antidepressant response. The levels of hippocampal PACAP expression were reduced in both two distinct depression animal models and intra-DG knockdown of PACAP induced depression-like behaviors. Conversely, a single infusion of PACAP into the DG region produced a rapid and sustained antidepressant response in both normal and chronically stressed mice. Optogenetic intra-DG excitation of PACAP-expressing neurons instantly elicited antidepressant responses, while optogenetic inhibition induced depression-like behaviors. The longer optogenetic excitation/inhibition elicited the more sustained antidepressant/depression-like responses. Intra-DG PACAP infusion immediately facilitated the signaling for rapid antidepressant response by inhibiting calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII)-eukaryotic elongation factor 2 (eEF2) and activating the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Pre-activation of CaMKII signaling within the DG blunted PACAP-induced rapid antidepressant response as well as eEF2-mTOR-brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) signaling. Finally, acute ketamine treatment upregulated hippocampal PACAP expression, whereas intra-DG blockade of PACAP signaling attenuated ketamine's rapid antidepressant response. CONCLUSIONS: Activation of hippocampal PACAP signaling induces a rapid antidepressant response through the regulation of CaMKII inhibition-governed eEF2-mTOR-BDNF signaling.

The association of FKBP5 gene polymorphism with genetic susceptibility to depression and response to antidepressant treatment- a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Given the inconsistencies in current studies regarding the impact of FKBP5 gene polymorphisms on depression, arising from variations in study methods, subjects, and treatment strategies, this paper provides a comprehensive review of the relationship between FKBP5 gene polymorphisms and genetic susceptibility to depression, as well as their influence on response to antidepressant treatment. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched up to April 11, 2023, for all literature in English and Chinese on depression, FKBP5 gene polymorphisms, and antidepressant treatment. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed for key study characteristics. Qualitative methods were used to synthesize the study results. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies were included, with the majority exhibiting average to moderate quality. Six SNPs (rs3800373, rs1360780, rs9470080, rs4713916, rs9296158, rs9394309) were broadly implicated in susceptibility to depression, while rs1360780 and rs3800373 were linked to antidepressant treatment sensitivity. Additionally, rs1360780 was associated with adverse reactions to antidepressant drug treatment. However, these associations were largely unconfirmed in replication studies. CONCLUSIONS: Depression is recognized as a polygenic genetic disorder, with multiple genes contributing, each exerting relatively small effects. Future studies should explore not only multiple gene interactions but also epigenetic changes. Presently, research on FKBP5 in affective disorders remains notably limited, highlighting the necessity for further investigations in this domain.

Serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor, Val66Met polymorphism and open-label SSRI treatment response in Major Depressive Disorder.

BACKGROUND: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) has been implicated in the therapeutic action of antidepressants and possibly in the pathophysiology of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Clinical studies of peripheral blood levels of BDNF in MDD have provided conflicting results, and there are also conflicting reports regarding the predictive value of peripheral BDNF levels for antidepressant treatment response. The present study investigated the association between serum BDNF levels, the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism (rs6265), clinical characteristics and SSRI treatment response. METHODS: This open-label clinical trial included 99 physically healthy, unmedicated MDD participants and 70 healthy controls. Following a baseline assessment, 53 of the MDD participants completed an eight-week, open-label course of SSRI antidepressant treatment. Serum BDNF levels and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HDRS) ratings were examined at baseline and after eight weeks of treatment. Antidepressant response was defined as a decrease in HDRS ratings of > 50% from baseline to the end-of-treatment. Finally, serum BDNF levels and SSRI treatment response were compared between MDD participants who were heterozygous or homozygous for the Met allele ("Met-carriers") and individuals homozygous for the Val allele. RESULTS: Serum BDNF levels at baseline were significantly higher in the unmedicated MDD participants compared to healthy controls (15.90 ng/ml vs 13.75 ng/ml, t (167) = -2.041, p = 0.043). In a post-hoc analysis, this difference was seen in the female but not male participants (16.85 ng/ml vs 14.06 ng/ml, t (91) = -2.067, p = 0.042; 14.86 ng/ml vs 13.31 ng/ml, t (74) = -0.923, p = 0.359). Baseline serum BDNF levels were not associated with treatment responder status or with absolute change in depression ratings over the course of 8-week SSRI treatment (p = 0.599). In both Responders and Non-responders, no significant changes in serum BDNF levels were found over the 8-week period of SSRI-treatment (16.32 ng/ml vs 16.23 ng/ml, t (18) = 0.060, p = 0.953; 16.04 ng/ml vs 15.61 ng/ml, t (29) = 0.438, p = 0.665, respectively). Further, no differences were found in serum BDNF levels prior to treatment between MDD Met-carriers and MDD Val/Val homozygotes (15.32 ng/ml vs 16.36 ng/ml, t (85) = 0.747, p = 0.457), and no differences were found in post-treatment serum BDNF (F1,42= 0.031, p = 0.862). However, MDD Val/Val homozygotes showed significantly greater antidepressant responses at week 8 than did MDD Met-carriers (F1,46 = 4.366, p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Our results do not support sufficient reliability of using peripheral BDNF to characterize depression or to predict antidepressant response in clinical use. The role of sex in moderating BDNF differences in depression, and the role of BDNF gene polymorphisms in predicting antidepressant response, remain to be further investigated. We conclude that, while central nervous system BDNF is likely involved in antidepressant efficacy and in aspects of MDD pathophysiology, its reflection in serum BDNF levels is of limited diagnostic or prognostic utility.

Structure-function coupling and hierarchy-specific antidepressant response in major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Extensive research has explored altered structural and functional networks in major depressive disorder (MDD). However, studies examining the relationships between structure and function yielded heterogeneous and inconclusive results. Recent work has suggested that the structure-function relationship is not uniform throughout the brain but varies across different levels of functional hierarchy. This study aims to investigate changes in structure-function couplings (SFC) and their relevance to antidepressant response in MDD from a functional hierarchical perspective. METHODS: We compared regional SFC between individuals with MDD (n = 258) and healthy controls (HC, n = 99) using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging. We also compared antidepressant non-responders (n = 55) and responders (n = 68, defined by a reduction in depressive severity of >50%). To evaluate variations in altered and response-associated SFC across the functional hierarchy, we ranked significantly different regions by their principal gradient values and assessed patterns of increase or decrease along the gradient axis. The principal gradient value, calculated from 219 healthy individuals in the Human Connectome Project, represents a region's position along the principal gradient axis. RESULTS: Compared to HC, MDD patients exhibited increased SFC in unimodal regions (lower principal gradient) and decreased SFC in transmodal regions (higher principal gradient) (p < 0.001). Responders primarily had higher SFC in unimodal regions and lower SFC in attentional networks (median principal gradient) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal opposing SFC alterations in low-level unimodal and high-level transmodal networks, underscoring spatial variability in MDD pathology. Moreover, hierarchy-specific antidepressant effects provide valuable insights into predicting treatment outcomes.

The impact of menopause on antidepressant response: an explorative analysis from a real-world study.

This study endeavors to deepen our understanding of the subject matter by exploring, within a real-world sample, the impact of menopausal status on the antidepressant treatments response. The whole sample included a total of 447 patients, 156 male and 291 female, 110 pre-menopause and 181 post-menopause. In our sample post-menopause women showed a worse response to antidepressants than pre-menopause women (p = 0.006), and this difference seems to be unrelated to age or brain aging.

Distinct MRI-based functional and structural connectivity for antidepressant response prediction in major depressive disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Emerging studies have identified treatment-related connectome predictors in major depressive disorder (MDD). However, quantifying treatment-responsive patterns in structural connectivity (SC) and functional connectivity (FC) simultaneously remains underexplored. We aimed to evaluate whether spatial distributions of FC and SC associated treatment responses are shared or unique. METHODS: Diffusion tensor imaging and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging were collected from 210 patients with MDD at baseline. We separately developed connectome-based prediction models (CPM) to predict reduction of depressive severity after 6-week monotherapy based on structural, functional, and combined connectomes, then validated them on the external dataset. We identified the predictive SC and FC from CPM with high occurrence frequencies during the cross-validation. RESULTS: Structural connectomes (r = 0.2857, p < 0.0001), functional connectomes (r = 0.2057, p = 0.0025), and their combined CPM (r = 0.4, p < 0.0001) can significantly predict a reduction of depressive severity. We didn't find shared connectivity between predictive FC and SC. Specifically, the most predictive FC stemmed from the default mode network, while predictive SC was mainly characterized by within-network SC of fronto-limbic networks. CONCLUSIONS: These distinct patterns suggest that SC and FC capture unique connectivity concerning the antidepressant response. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings provide comprehensive insights into the neurophysiology of antidepressants response.

Antidepressant effects of dexmedetomidine compared with ECT in patients with treatment-resistant depression.

OBJECTIVE: This pilot study was designed to investigate the antidepressant effects of dexmedetomidine (DEX), a selective α2-adrenergic receptor agonist, in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The antidepressant effects of dexmedetomidine was compared with ECT, which is widely used in clinical practice for treatment of patients with TRD. METHODS: Seventy six patients with TRD were randomly assigned to receive 10 sessions of DEX infusions or electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) treatment. The primary outcome was the changes of depression severity determined by the improvement of 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-24). The second outcomes were the rates of therapeutic response (reduction in HDRS-24 ≥ 50 %) and remission (HDRS-24 ≤ 10 and reduction in HDRS-24 ≥ 60 %) at posttreatment and after 3 months of follow-up visits. RESULTS: We found that 10 sessions of DEX infusions or ECT treatments significantly improved HDRS-24 scores at posttreatment and after 3 months of follow-up visits compared with the baseline. In addition, there was no significant difference between DEX infusions and ECT treatments regarding HDRS-24 at these evaluating points. Furthermore, the depression severity dropped to mild after 2 sessions of DEX infusion. In contrast, at least 6 sessions of ECT treatment were needed to achieve a same level. Finally, the rates of therapeutic response and remission were comparable between the two groups. No serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Based on current published evidence, we conclude that DEX exhibits rapid and durable antidepressant properties similar to ECT but with fewer side effects.

Genome-wide transcriptomic and biochemical profiling of major depressive disorder: Unravelling association with susceptibility, severity, and antidepressant response.

Identifying biomarkers for diagnosing Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), assessing its severity, and guiding treatment is crucial. We conducted whole genome transcriptomic study in North Indian population, and analyzed biochemical parameters. Our longitudinal study investigated gene-expression profiles from 72 drug-free MDD patients and 50 healthy controls(HCs) at baseline and 24 patients after 12-weeks of treatment. Gene expression analyses identified differentially expressed genes(DEGs) associated with MDD susceptibility, symptom severity and treatment response, independently validated by qPCR. Hierarchical clustering revealed distinct expression patterns between MDD and HCs, also between mild and severe cases. Enrichment analyses of significant DEGs revealed inflammatory, apoptosis, and immune-related pathways in MDD susceptibility, severity, and treatment response. Simultaneously, we assessed thirty biochemical parameters in the same cohort, showed significant differences between MDD and HCs in 13 parameters with monocytes, eosinophils, creatinine, SGPT, and total protein remained independent predictors of MDD in a multivariate-regression model. Our study supports the role of altered immune/inflammatory signaling in MDD pathophysiology, offering clinically relevant biochemical parameters and insights into transcriptomic gene regulation in MDD pathogenesis and treatment response.

Biological markers of sex-based differences in major depressive disorder and in antidepressant response.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) presents different clinical features in women and men, with women being more affected and responding differently to antidepressant treatment. Specific molecular mechanisms underlying these differences are not well studied and this narrative review aims at providing an overview of the neurobiological features underlying sex-differences in biological systems involved in MDD pathophysiology and response to antidepressant treatment, focusing on human studies. The majority of the reviewed studies were performed through candidate gene approaches, focusing on biological systems involved in MDD pathophysiology, including the stress response, inflammatory and immune, monoaminergic, neurotrophic, gamma-aminobutyric acid and glutamatergic, and oxytocin systems. The influence of the endocrine system and sex-specific hormone effects are also discussed. Genome, epigenome and transcriptome-wide approaches are less frequently performed and most of these studies do not focus on sex-specific alterations, revealing a paucity of omics studies directed to unravel sex-based differences in MDD. Few studies about sex-related differences in antidepressant treatment response have been conducted, mostly involving the inflammatory system, with less evidence on the monoaminergic system and sparse evidence in omics approaches. Our review covers the importance of accounting for sex-differences in research, optimizing patient stratification for a more precise diagnostic and individualized treatment for women and men.

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and antidepressant treatment response in patients with major depressive disorder: Effect of sex and hippocampal volume.

Several factors may affect response to treatment in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) including immune/inflammatory alterations and regional brain volumes, particularly in hippocampal regions which have shown to be influenced by inflammatory status. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an inflammatory marker found to be elevated in depressed women in large population studies. Here we investigate the effect of NLR on treatment response in MDD patients, and the role of sex and hippocampal volume on influencing this relationship. A sample of 124 MDD depressed inpatients (F = 80) underwent MRI acquisition, admission NLR was calculated by dividing absolute neutrophil by absolute lymphocyte counts and depression severity was assessed at admission and discharge via the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). As a measure of treatment response, delta HDRS was calculated. We found a significant moderation effect of sex on the relationship between NLR and Delta HDRS: a negative relation was found in females and a positive one in males. NLR was found to negatively affect hippocampal volumes in females. Both left and right hippocampal volume positively associated with Delta HDRS. Finally, left hippocampal volume mediated the effect of NLR on Delta HDRS in females. Sex moderated the relation between inflammation and treatment response in line with previous reports linking inflammation to hampered antidepressant effect in females. Further, this effect is partially mediated by hippocampal volume, suggesting that antidepressant response may be hampered by the detrimental effect of inflammation on the brain.

Genetics of antidepressant response and treatment-resistant depression.

Antidepressant response, the effectiveness of antidepressants in relieving symptoms of depression, is a complex trait influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. However, despite decades of research, the specific genetic variations that contribute to antidepressant response and treatment-resistant depression (TRD) remain largely unknown. In this review, we summarize the current state of knowledge of the genetics of antidepressant response and TRD, including candidate gene association studies, genome-wide association studies (GWAS), polygenic risk score (PRS) analyses, whole genome sequencing studies, research on other genetic and epigenetic changes, and the potential for precision medicine in this field. Although some progress has been made in identifying genetic factors associated with antidepressant response and TRD, much work remains to be done, particularly in terms of larger sample sizes and standardization of outcome measures. Further research in this area has the potential to improve the treatment of depression and increase the chances of successful treatment for individuals with this common and debilitating mental illness.

Cognitive, Disability, and Treatment Outcome Implications of Symptom-Based Phenotyping in Late-Life Depression.

OBJECTIVE: Late-life depression is associated with substantial heterogeneity in clinical presentation, disability, and response to antidepressant treatment. We examined whether self-report of severity of common symptoms, including anhedonia, apathy, rumination, worry, insomnia, and fatigue were associated with differences in presentation and response to treatment. We also examined whether these symptoms improved during treatment with escitalopram. DESIGN: Eighty-nine older adults completed baseline assessments, neuropsychological testing and providing self-reported symptom and disability scales. They then entered an 8-week, placebo-controlled randomized trial of escitalopram, and self-report scales were repeated at the trial's end. Raw symptom scale scores were combined into three standardized symptom phenotypes and models examined how symptom phenotype severity was associated with baseline measures and depression improvement over the trial. RESULTS: While rumination/worry appeared independent, severity of apathy/anhedonia and fatigue/insomnia were associated with one another and with greater self-reported disability. Greater fatigue/insomnia was also associated with slower processing speed, while rumination/worry was associated with poorer episodic memory. No symptom phenotype severity score predicted a poorer overall response to escitalopram. In secondary analyses, escitalopram did not improve most phenotypic symptoms more than placebo, aside for greater reductions in worry and total rumination severity. CONCLUSION: Deeper symptom phenotype characterization may highlight differences in the clinical presentation of late-life depression. However, when compared to placebo, escitalopram did not improve many of the symptoms assessed. Further work is needed to determine whether symptom phenotypes inform longer-term course of illness, and which treatments may best benefit specific symptoms.

Antidepressant Response and Stress Resilience Are Promoted by CART Peptides in GABAergic Neurons of the Anterior Cingulate Cortex.

Background: A key challenge in the understanding and treatment of depression is identifying cell types and molecular mechanisms that mediate behavioral responses to antidepressant drugs. Because treatment responses in clinical depression are heterogeneous, it is crucial to examine treatment responders and nonresponders in preclinical studies. Methods: We used the large variance in behavioral responses to long-term treatment with multiple classes of antidepressant drugs in different inbred mouse strains and classified the mice into responders and nonresponders based on their response in the forced swim test. Medial prefrontal cortex tissues were subjected to RNA sequencing to identify molecules that are consistently associated across antidepressant responders. We developed and used virus-mediated gene transfer to induce the gene of interest in specific cell types and performed forced swim, sucrose preference, social interaction, and open field tests to investigate antidepressant-like and anxiety-like behaviors. Results: Cartpt expression was consistently upregulated in responders to four types of antidepressants but not in nonresponders in different mice strains. Responder mice given a single dose of ketamine, a fast-acting non-monoamine-based antidepressant, exhibited high CART peptide expression. CART peptide overexpression in the GABAergic (gamma-aminobutyric acidergic) neurons of the anterior cingulate cortex led to antidepressant-like behavior and drove chronic stress resiliency independently of mouse genetic background. Conclusions: These data demonstrate that activation of CART peptide signaling in GABAergic neurons of the anterior cingulate cortex is a common molecular mechanism across antidepressant responders and that this pathway also drives stress resilience.

White matter predicts tDCS antidepressant effects in a sham-controlled clinical trial study.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used as treatment for depression, but its effects are heterogeneous. We investigated, in a subsample of the clinical trial Escitalopram versus Electrical Direct Current Therapy for Depression Study (ELECTTDCS), whether white matter areas associated with depression disorder were associated with tDCS response. Baseline diffusion tensor imaging data were analyzed from 49 patients (34 females, mean age 41.9) randomized to escitalopram 20 mg/day, tDCS (2 mA, 30 min, 22 sessions), or placebo. Antidepressant outcomes were assessed by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HDRS) after 10-week treatment. We used whole-brain tractography for extracting white matter measures for anterior corpus callosum, and bilaterally for cingulum bundle, striato-frontal, inferior occipito-frontal fasciculus and uncinate. For the rostral body, tDCS group showed higher MD associated with antidepressant effects (estimate = -5.13 ± 1.64, p = 0.002), and tDCS significantly differed from the placebo and the escitalopram group. The left striato-frontal tract showed higher FA associated with antidepressant effects (estimate = -2.14 ± 0.72, p = 0.003), and tDCS differed only from the placebo group. For the right uncinate, the tDCS group lower AD values were associated with higher HDRS decrease (estimate = -1.45 ± 0.67, p = 0.031). Abnormalities in white matter MDD-related areas are associated with tDCS antidepressant effects. Suggested better white matter microstructure of the left prefrontal cortex was associated with tDCS antidepressant effects. Future studies should investigate whether these findings are driven by electric field diffusion and density in these areas.

Systematic review and meta-analysis on the therapeutic reference range for escitalopram: Blood concentrations, clinical effects and serotonin transporter occupancy.

Introduction: A titration within a certain therapeutic reference range presupposes a relationship between the blood concentration and the therapeutic effect of a drug. However, this has not been systematically investigated for escitalopram. Furthermore, the recommended reference range disagrees with mean steady state concentrations (11-21 ng/ml) that are expected under the approved dose range (10-20 mg/day). This work systematically investigated the relationships between escitalopram dose, blood levels, clinical effects, and serotonin transporter occupancy. Methods: Following our previously published methodology, relevant articles were systematically searched and reviewed for escitalopram. Results: Of 1,032 articles screened, a total of 30 studies met the eligibility criteria. The included studies investigated escitalopram blood levels in relationship to clinical effects (9 studies) or moderating factors on escitalopram metabolism (12 studies) or serotonin transporter occupancy (9 studies). Overall, the evidence for an escitalopram concentration/effect relationship is low (level C). Conclusion: Based on our findings, we propose a target range of 20-40 ng/ml for antidepressant efficacy of escitalopram. In maintenance treatment, therapeutic response is expected, when titrating patients above the lower limit. The lower concentration threshold is strongly supported by findings from neuroimaging studies. The upper limit for escitalopram's reference range rather reflects a therapeutic maximum than a tolerability threshold, since the incidence of side effects in general is low. Concentrations above 40 ng/ml should not necessarily result in dose reductions in case of good clinical efficacy and tolerability. Dose-related escitalopram concentrations in different trials were more than twice the expected concentrations from guideline reports. Systematic review registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=215873], identifier [CRD42020215873].