Utility of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel combination for the treatment of advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer patients with malignant pleural effusion.

Background: Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) remains a negative prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), even after the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of MPE. Bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against VEGF, is a key agent for patients who develop MPE. However, it is unclear whether MPE is a poor prognostic factor in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC receiving treatment with the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (ABCP) regimen. Moreover, the effect of ABCP on MPE control is unknown. This study aimed to elucidate the efficacy and safety of ABCP for non-squamous NSCLC patients with MPE. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC who received treatment with ABCP (January 2019-September 2023). Patients were divided into two groups (non-MPE and MPE), and treatment outcomes were compared. In the MPE group, treatment efficacy for MPE control and toxicity were evaluated. Results: Of the 46 patients enrolled, 17 and 29 were included in the non-MPE and MPE groups, respectively. The objective response and disease control rates were not significantly different between the non-MPE and MPE groups (76.5% vs. 51.7%, P=0.13; 88.2% vs. 82.8%, P>0.99; respectively). Similarly, the median progression-free survival and median overall survival were not significantly different (9.9 vs. 10.1 months, P=0.87; 16.0 vs. 19.9 months, P=0.87, respectively). In the MPE group, 25 patients (86.2%) achieved MPE control lasting >8 weeks from the initiation of treatment with ABCP; the median progression-free survival without an unequivocal increase in MPE was 15.0 months. The incidence rates of grade ≥3 non-immune- and immune-related adverse events were 83% and 17%, respectively. There was no treatment-related death. Conclusions: The ABCP regimen may be a promising treatment option for non-squamous NSCLC patients with MPE.

Robot-assisted extended rectal anterior resection for peritoneal dissemination of hepatocellular carcinoma invading rectum after atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combined therapy.

The prognosis for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with extrahepatic metastasis remains poor. In recent years, the combination therapy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (ATZ/BEV) has demonstrated remarkable antitumor efficacy against HCC. Conversion surgery following chemotherapy emerges as a promising strategy for initially unresectable HCC. A 74-year-old man was referred to our department with disseminated HCC in the rectovesical pouch. He underwent hepatic subsegmental resection for primary HCC with abdominal wall invasion on the background of chronic hepatitis B 7 years ago. Intrahepatic recurrence was emerged 5 and 2 years ago, which was successfully managed with transarterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation, respectively. Subsequently, 4 cm peritoneal dissemination appeared in the rectovesical pouch, invading the rectum, right pelvic neural plexus, and right seminal vesicle. ATZ/BEV therapy was initiated, but bevacizumab had to be discontinued due to fistula formation between the rectum and the tumor after two courses, and atezolizumab monotherapy was continued. After 1 year of ATZ/BEV combined therapy followed by atezolizumab monotherapy, the disseminated tumor, though still visible, exhibited a significant reduction, with no new intra- or extrahepatic lesions. To confirm the absence of other disseminated lesions, a diagnostic laparoscopy was performed. Subsequently, robot-assisted extended rectal anterior resection with the right seminal vesicle and right pelvic neural plexus, and permanent colostomy (Hartmann's procedure) were performed. Histopathological examination revealed disseminated HCC with a 4 mm resection margin to achieve R0 resection. We present a case of disseminated HCC successfully undergoing curative surgery through robot-assisted extended rectal anterior resection following ATZ/BEV combined therapy. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13691-024-00688-0.

Case report: The efficacy of adding high doses of intravenous vitamin C to the combination therapy of atezolizumab and bevacizumab in unresectable HCC.

Introduction: Vitamin C (L-ascorbic acid) plays a vital role in human physiology, serving as both an antioxidant and a cofactor in enzymatic reactions. High-dose intravenous Vitamin C can achieve significantly elevated plasma concentrations, potentially enhancing its anticancer effects. This case study explores the synergistic impact of high-dose intravenous vitamin C in combination with bevacizumab and atezolizumab in the treatment of a patient with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Case presentation: A 68-year-old male was diagnosed with unresectable HCC, presenting with elevated liver enzymes and an alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level of 2018 ng/mL. Initial treatment with atezolizumab and Bevacizumab commenced in February 2022. Although imaging indicated stable disease, AFP levels decreased modestly to 1,526 ng/mL, while liver function tests remained elevated, accompanied by further clinical deterioration and weight loss. Subsequently, intravenous vitamin C (30 grams) was introduced into the treatment regimen. This addition led to a rapid and significant reduction in AFP levels, normalization of liver function tests, and marked improvement in clinical symptoms. The patient continued on this combined regimen of vitamin c, atezolizumab, and bevacizumab. Four months later, CT scans revealed significant tumor shrinkage and necrosis. As of 30 months post-diagnosis, the patient remains on the regimen with normal liver function and an AFP level of 1.8 ng/mL, maintaining normal activities and stable weight. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of combining high-dose intravenous vitamin C with Bevacizumab and atezolizumab, which proved to be safe and resulted in significant clinical and radiological improvements in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Further studies are recommended to explore the potential of this combination therapy.

Transforming Lung Cancer Management: A Promising Case Study of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Success Following a Multidisciplinary Approach.

A 54-year-old female patient diagnosed with Stage IIIb squamous cell carcinoma (cT2aN3M0) initially received chemoradiotherapy. Two years after initial treatment, cancer relapse led to the administration of nivolumab, which was halted due to the development of drug-induced pneumonitis. Subsequent management with prednisolone and eight different cytotoxic agents failed to prevent metastasis to the cervical lymph nodes. The tumor's programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression rate was recorded at 10%. Four years after her diagnosis, the patient received a ninth-line therapy combining cisplatin, gemcitabine, and necitumumab, followed by palliative neck radiation due to increasing lymph node size. Remarkable tumor regression occurred three months after introducing atezolizumab as the tenth-line treatment, suggesting that previous treatments, particularly radiotherapy and cisplatin, might have enhanced PD-L1 expression, aligning with the existing literature. This case highlights the urgent need for further research to elucidate the intricate interplay between treatment history and PD-L1 expression in squamous cell carcinoma, emphasizing the importance of accumulating case studies to inform therapeutic strategies.

Prognostic Significance of Psoas Muscle Index in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparative Analysis of Lenvatinib and Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab.

Background and Aims: Skeletal muscle loss has been identified as a prognostic factor in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) undergoing treatment with lenvatinib (LEN). While atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (ATZ-BEV) is recommended as first-line therapy for uHCC, the impact of skeletal muscle loss in these patients remains unclear. Methods: We enrolled 97 patients treated with either LEN or ATZ-BEV as their first-line therapy and divided them into two groups based on the presence or absence of a low psoas muscle index (low PMI) before treatment. We compared patient characteristics and overall survival (OS) between the groups. Additionally, we investigated the transition of the PMI during drug therapy, specifically before treatment, at the initial evaluation, and after the end of treatment. Results: Seventy percent of patients in the LEN group and seventy-one percent in the ATZ-BEV group had a low PMI. Multivariate analysis across all patients revealed a low PMI (hazard ratio [HR] 3.25, p = 0.0004) as a prognostic factor for OS. The PMI decreased more in the LEN group compared to the ATZ-BEV group. In the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer-C group, the OS of ATZ-BEV therapy was significantly better than that of LEN therapy when a low PMI was present (p = 0.046). Conclusions: A low PMI emerges as a significant prognostic factor in uHCC patients undergoing drug therapy, not only in LEN therapy but also in ATZ-BEV therapy. Additionally, ATZ-BEV therapy may be more favorable for sarcopenic patients with advanced HCC stages.

Effects of Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab on Skeletal Muscle Volume and Cardiac Function in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Pharmacological treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) includes sorafenib and lenvatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which are linked to low serum levels of carnitine and reduced skeletal muscle volume. Nowadays, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo/Bev) combination therapy is recommended as the first-line treatment for patients with uHCC. However, the association with decreased muscle mass or cardiac function is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of Atezo/Bev on skeletal muscle volume and cardiac function in patients with uHCC. METHODS: This retrospective study included 55 adult Japanese patients with chronic liver diseases and uHCC treated with Atezo/Bev. Patients were divided into three groups according to age: middle, preold, and old. Serum levels of carnitine and cardiac function were measured before and after 3 weeks of treatment. The psoas muscle index (PMI) was measured before and after 6 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: After treatment, the global longitudinal strain was significantly lower in the old group, whereas the PMI and ejection fraction were significantly lower in the preold and old groups. However, no significant difference in serum levels of total carnitine and those fractions with treatment in each group was found. Cardiac function decreased in the preold and old groups. CONCLUSION: When treating patients with uHCC by Atezo/Bev, caution should be taken in preold and old patients because they are vulnerable to decreased skeletal muscle mass and deterioration of cardiac function. Strength training and regular monitoring of cardiac function are encouraged in these groups.

A case of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated hemophagocytosis after initiation of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

A woman in the 70s with a decreased appetite and weight loss (4 kg) in the last 3 months was referred to our hospital. An enhanced CT scan of the abdomen showed a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of 83 mm in diameter of the liver with metastasis to the para-aortic lymph nodes, the left adrenal gland, and the right lower lung lobe (cStage IVb). She was started on atezolizumab + bevacizumab (Atezo-Bev) therapy. A week after the treatment, she began to have a decreased appetite, fever in the 39 °C range, subcutaneous bleeding, and a slight headache when walking. So she was urgently admitted to our hospital. We diagnosed her as having a hemophagocytic syndrome and administered 1 g steroid pulse therapy for 3 days followed by 1 mg/kg of prednisone. Her condition began to improve. This is the first case report of a hemophagocytic syndrome in a patient with HCC treated with Atezo-Bev.

Efficacy of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Combined with Transarterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-World Study.

Purpose: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), when used in combination with immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy, has been shown to have synergistic anticancer effects. The aim of this study was to further assess the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with atezolizumab and bevacizumab in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the real world. Methods: Between August 2021 and September 2023, clinical information was collected from consecutive HCC patients who received treatment via TACE-Atezo/Bev at four tertiary institutions. This study evaluated the objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) as outcomes. Predictors for OS and PFS were also analyzed. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were recorded and assessed. Results: Ninety-two patients were enrolled in this study, with a median follow-up duration of 14.1 months. The ORRs based on the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and RECIST 1.1 criteria were 54.3% and 41.3%, respectively. The median OS and PFS of the patients were 15.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 14.5-17.2 months] and 9.1 months (95% CI, 7.4-10.8 months), respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score and neutrophil‒lymphocyte ratio were independent risk factors for OS, whereas tumor size and extrahepatic metastasis were independent risk factors for PFS. Grade 3/4 TRAEs occurred in 16.3% (15/92) of the patients and were controlled conservatively. Conclusion: The combination of Atezo/Bev with TACE demonstrated acceptable synergistic therapeutic effects and manageable safety profiles in patients with unresectable HCC.

A Potential Pneumothorax Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Background and Objectives: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which target immune checkpoints in cancer cells, are increasingly used as a mainstay in anticancer treatment. The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab is also a first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, ICIs can cause immune-related adverse events (IrAEs) which range from mild to severe, potentially leading to the need for discontinuing immunotherapy. We report a case of a pneumothorax, a rare side effect caused by IrAEs. Materials and Methods: This paper reports a case of a 78-year-old male HCC patient who developed a recurrent pneumothorax, suspected to be an adverse effect of ICIs. Results: The patient was a current smoker with a 30 pack-year smoking history. Prior to initiating ICIs, a chest CT scan showed mild emphysema and fibrosis attributable to smoking. Following ICI treatment, the patient developed a recurrent pneumothorax. Further tests revealed no underlying cause for the pneumothorax other than the ICIs and smoking, and there were no signs of intrapulmonary metastasis or pneumonitis. Conclusions: When a pneumothorax occurs in a patient undergoing immunotherapy, it is important to consider it as a potential adverse effect of the treatment. Special attention should be given to the possibility that immunotherapy may exacerbate underlying lung conditions. Patients should be advised on the importance of smoking cessation. As there are currently no guidelines for resuming immunotherapy after a pneumothorax, it is crucial to weigh the risks and benefits and consider dose reduction or discontinuation of the medication.

Lenvatinib versus Sorafenib Second-Line Therapy in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progressed to Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab: A Retrospective Real-World Study.

INTRODUCTION: The most frequently used first-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. Upon progression after this treatment, the standard of care in many countries is sorafenib, due to the lack of reimbursement for other drugs. Several randomized trials are currently underway to clarify the best second-line therapy in patients with HCC. This real-world study aimed to compare outcomes reached by lenvatinib and sorafenib second-line therapy in this setting. METHODS: The overall cohort included 891 patients with HCC from 5 countries treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in first-line setting between October 2018 and April 2022. At the data cut-off (May 2022), 41.5% of patients were continuing a first-line treatment, 5.5% were lost at follow-up, and 53.0% of patients had progressive disease after first-line therapy. 51.5% of patients with progressive disease received a second-line treatment, while 48.5% did not receive any subsequent therapy. Between patients receiving second-line treatment, 11.1% of patients underwent transarterial chemoembolization, 21.0% received sorafenib, 35.4% underwent lenvatinib, and 32.5% were treated with other drugs. RESULTS: Lenvatinib second-line subgroup achieved a median overall survival (mOS) of 18.9 months, significative longer (p = 0.01; hazard ratio [HR]: 2.24) compared to sorafenib subgroup that reached a mOS of 14.3 months. The multivariate analysis highlighted albumin-bilirubin 1 grade (p < 0.01; HR: 5.23) and lenvatinib second-line therapy (p = 0.01; HR: 2.18) as positive prognostic factors for OS. The forest plot highlighted a positive trend in terms of OS in favor of patients treated with lenvatinib second-line regardless of baseline characteristics before first-line therapy. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that, in patients with HCC progressed to first-line atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, lenvatinib second-line therapy is associated to an improved survival compared to sorafenib.

Comparing Lenvatinib/Pembrolizumab with Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-World Experience with Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The combination of anti-angiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized the management of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). While an early-phase study demonstrated promising outcomes for lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (L+P) in treating uHCC, the LEAP-002 trial did not meet its primary endpoint. However, the comparative efficacy between L+P and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A+B) as first-line treatment remains a topic of uncertainty. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of L+P in contrast to A+B among patients diagnosed with uHCC. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of enrolled patients with uHCC who received L+P or A+B as initial systemic treatment at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital from June 2019 to December 2022. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) by modified RECIST were compared. RESULTS: 121 patients were recruited, with 37 receiving L+P and 84 receiving A+B. Among them, 95 (78.5%) patients were BCLC stage C, and 99 (81.8%) patients had viral etiology for HCC, predominantly chronic HBV (68.6%). Both the L+P and the A+B groups demonstrated comparable OS (18.2 months versus 14.6 months, p = 0.35) and PFS (7.3 months versus 8.9 months, p = 0.75). The ORR and DCR were similar. After propensity score matching, the results remained consistent between the matched patients. Treatment-related adverse events of any grade occurred in 30 (81.1%) in the L+P group and 62 (73.8%) in the A+B group. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that L+P and A+B exhibit comparable efficacy and safety profiles in real-world settings.

Overall Survival in Real-World Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Versus Sorafenib or Lenvatinib as First-Line Therapy: Findings from the National Veterans Health Administration Database.

Background/Objectives: This study evaluated comparative overall survival (OS) of United States veterans with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) receiving first-line (1L) atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs. sorafenib or lenvatinib, overall and across racial and ethnic groups. Methods: In this retrospective study, patients with uHCC who initiated atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (post-2020) or sorafenib or lenvatinib (post-2018) were identified from the Veterans Health Administration National Corporate Data Warehouse (1 January 2017-31 December 2022). Patient characteristics were evaluated in the year prior to 1L treatment initiation. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression methods were used to compare OS starting from treatment between cohorts, both overall and by race and ethnicity. Results: Among the 1874 patients included, 405 (21.6%) received 1L atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, 1016 (54.2%) received sorafenib, and 453 (24.2%) received lenvatinib, with a median follow-up time of 8.5, 7.6, and 8.2 months, respectively. Overall, patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab had longer unadjusted median OS (12.8 [95% CI: 10.6, 17.1] months) than patients receiving sorafenib (8.0 [7.1, 8.6] months) or lenvatinib (9.5 [7.8, 11.4] months; both log-rank p < 0.001). After adjustment, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab was associated with a reduced risk of death by 30% vs. sorafenib (adjusted HR: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.60, 0.82]) and by 26% vs. lenvatinib (0.74 [0.62, 0.88]; both p < 0.001). OS trends in the White, Black, and Hispanic patient cohorts were consistent with that of the overall population. Conclusions: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab was associated with improved survival outcomes compared with sorafenib and lenvatinib in patients with uHCC, both overall and across racial and ethnic subgroups.

Triple combination of vemurafenib, cobimetinib, and atezolizumab in real clinical practice in the Russian Federation: results of the A1 cohort of the ISABELLA study.

Background: Among several treatment options for BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma, a combination of BRAF inhibitor, MEK inhibitor, and anti-PDL1 antibody seems to be a new emergent approach recently registered in the Russian Federation. It is still not clear which patient population benefits more from this simultaneous use of three drugs instead of its sequencing. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate patients' characteristics treated in real practice in 14 Russian regions by triple combination and to analyze their outcomes depending on biomarkers (PD-L1 expression). Methods: This was a part (cohort A1) of a prospective non-interventional study of clinical outcomes and biomarkers in patients with skin melanoma. Patients were included in cohort A1 if combination treatment with vemurafenib (vem) + cobimetinib (cobi) + atezolizumab (atezo) was initiated no earlier than 12 weeks (84 days) prior to written informed consent to participate in this study. The index event was the initiation of therapy with all three drugs vem + cobi + atezo (i.e., triple combination). The primary efficacy endpoint of the study was the 24-month overall survival (OS), defined as the time from the index date to the date of death from any cause. If the patient did not experience an event, the OS will be censored at the date of the last contact. Objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), and progression-free survival (PFS) in the Intention to treat (ITT) population, in biomarker positive population, and in population with brain metastases were also evaluated. Quality of life questionnaires were pre-planned by protocol if it was a part of routine practice. Adverse events were also collected. Results: Between March 2021 and May 2023, 59 patients were enrolled in 19 centers from 14 regions of Russia. Thirty-one of 59 (52.4%) patients had central nervous system metastases, and 18 of 31 (58.4%) were symptomatic. Forty of 59 patients (68%) received the triple combination as the first-line treatment. The median follow-up period was 16.83 [95% confidence interval (CI) 13.8-19.8] months. The mean duration of therapy with this regimen was 9.95 months (95% CI 7.48-13.8). ORR was 55.1%; progression as the best outcome was seen in 16.3%. The median DoR was 12.95 months (95% CI 11.0-14.8 months), with a median of 20.3 months (95% CI 9.1-31.5 months) when triple therapy was administered in the first-line treatment. In patients with brain metastases (N = 31), ORR was 45.1%; the median DoR was 12.95 (95% CI 11.0-14.8 months). The median PFS in the entire population was 13.6 months (95% CI 8.6-18.6); the 24-month PFS was 22%. The estimated median OS in the entire population was 15.8 months (95% CI NA); 24-month OS was 45% (95% CI 0.32-0.64). In multivariate Cox regression model, biomarkers of interest [lactate dehydrogenase, Programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1)] did not have statistically significant impact on PFS, OS, or DoR probably due to high data missing rate. No unexpected adverse events were reported. Grades 3-4 AEs were seen in 23 of 59 patients (38%) with most common were skin and liver toxicity. Conclusion: Triple combination of atezolizumab, vemurafenib, and cobimetinib had proven its efficacy and tolerability in real settings. No impact of potential predictive biomarkers was seen (NCT05402059).

T-Cell Dynamics Predicts Prognosis of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab.

Atezolizumab and bevacizumab show promise for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but identifying responsive patients remains challenging, due to tumor heterogeneity. This study explores immune dynamics following this combination therapy. Between 2020 and 2023, 29 patients with advanced HCC who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab at Severance Hospital, Seoul, were enrolled in this study. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were analyzed using flow cytometry and statistical methods to assess immune alterations and identify biomarkers. Baseline characteristics showed a diverse HCC cohort with a mean age of 64 years and 82.8% male predominance. Absence of extrahepatic metastasis was associated with better overall survival. Immune responses revealed distinct CD4+ T-cell phenotypes between the 'partial response (PR) + stable disease (SD)' and 'progressive disease (PD)' groups, with an overall increase in CD8+ T-cell phenotypes. Patients with higher frequencies of CD8+PD-1+Ki-67+ T cells experienced significantly improved overall survival, while those with lower frequencies of CD4+Foxp3+PD-1+LAG3+ T cells also had notable survival benefits. These findings enhance the overall understanding of immune responses to this combination therapy, facilitating improved patient stratification and personalized therapeutic approaches for HCC.

Efficacy of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab-Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Sequential Therapy for Patients with Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the impact of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) sequential therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), especially in patients with intermediate-stage HCC. A total of 212 patients were enrolled and categorized into the Atez/Bev-TACE sequential therapy (n = 23) or Atez/Bev monotherapy group (n = 189) between 2020 and 2024. Of these, patients with intermediate-stage HCC were categorized into the Atez/Bev-TACE sequential (n = 18) or Atez/Bev monotherapy group (n = 91). The best objective response rate, disease control rate, and median progression-free survival (PFS) after TACE were 73.9%, 82.6%, and 6.1 months, respectively. The PFS after TACE was significantly higher in the Atez/Bev sequential therapy group than in the no-Atez/Bev-administration group after TACE (6.9 months vs. 5.0 months, p = 0.025). The median overall survival (OS) was significantly higher in the Atez/Bev-TACE sequential therapy group than in the Atez/Bev monotherapy group for intermediate-stage HCC (34.9 months vs. 17.8 months; p = 0.016). Independent factors associated with OS were low alpha-fetoprotein levels, modified albumin-bilirubin 1 or 2a levels, and Atez/Bev-TACE sequential therapy. Atez/Bev-TACE sequential therapy improved prognosis compared with Atez/Bev monotherapy in patients with intermediate-stage HCC. Moreover, Atez/Bev should be readministered after TACE.

Characteristics and Prognosis of Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab Combination Therapy Who Achieved Complete Response.

AIM: To investigate the characteristics and prognosis of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Atz/Bev) who achieved a complete response (CR) according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). METHODS: A total of 120 patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) 0 or 1 and Child-Pugh A at the start of Atz/Bev treatment were included. Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C was recorded in 59 patients. RESULTS: The CR rate with Atz/Bev alone was 15.0%. The median time to CR was 3.4 months, and the median duration of CR was 15.6 months. A significant factor associated with achieving CR with Atz/Bev alone was an AFP ratio of 0.34 or less at 3 weeks. Adding transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the six patients who achieved a partial response increased the overall CR rate to 20%. Among the 24 patients who achieved CR, the median progression-free survival was 19.3 months, the median overall survival was not reached, and 14 patients (58.3%) were able to discontinue Atz/Bev and achieve a drug-free status. Twelve of these patients developed progressive disease (PD), but eleven successfully received post-PD treatments and responded well. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving CR by mRECIST using Atz/Bev alone or with additional TACE can be expected to offer an extremely favorable prognosis.

Cabozantinib Plus Atezolizumab or Cabozantinib Alone in Patients With Advanced NSCLC Previously Treated With an Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor: Results From the Phase 1b COSMIC-021 Study.

Introduction: We evaluated efficacy and safety of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab or cabozantinib alone in advanced NSCLC previously treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). Methods: COSMIC-021 (NCT03170960) is a phase 1b, multicenter study in advanced solid tumors. This analysis included patients with stage IV non-squamous NSCLC without actionable genomic aberrations in EGFR, ALK, ROS1, or BRAF-V600E who progressed on one prior ICI and less than or equal to two prior lines of systemic anticancer therapy. Patients received cabozantinib 40 mg orally/day plus atezolizumab 1200 mg intravenously every three weeks (combination cohort) or cabozantinib 60 mg orally/day (single-agent cabozantinib cohort). Primary end point of the combination cohort was objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 by investigator. Outcomes in the single-agent cabozantinib cohort were exploratory. Results: Eighty-one patients assigned to combination therapy and 31 assigned to single-agent cabozantinib received greater than or equal to one dose of study treatment. Median (range) follow-up was 26.1 months (12.1-44.2) and 22.4 months (1.5-29.0), respectively. Objective response rate was 20% (95% confidence interval: 11.7%-30.1%) in combination cohort and 6% (95% confidence interval: 0.8%-21.4%) in single-agent cabozantinib cohort. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 86% of patients in the combination cohort and 90% in the single-agent cabozantinib cohort; grade 3/4 TRAEs were 44% and 48%, respectively. There were two grade 5 TRAEs: pneumonitis (n = 1, combination) and gastric ulcer hemorrhage (n = 1, single-agent). Neither PD-L1 expression in tumor cells nor tumor mutation burden correlated with outcomes. Conclusions: Cabozantinib plus atezolizumab demonstrated modest clinical activity and manageable toxicity in advanced NSCLC after progression on prior ICI.

Newly established borderline resectable 1 (BR1) category is one of the favorable candidates for selecting the use of multidisciplinary combination therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with systemic therapy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the newly established oncological criteria of resectability of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for selecting suitable candidates for systemic and combination therapy. METHODS: The data of 156 consecutive HCC patients with intrahepatic target nodules who had initially received systemic therapy (lenvatinib and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab) were reviewed. The patients were classified into three groups according to the novel oncological criteria for resectability (R, resectable; BR1, borderline resectable 1; and BR2, borderline resectable 2). The prognostic ability and clinical utility for selecting this population to receive combined use of multiple systemic sequential and locoregional therapy was then evaluated. Combined use of systemic sequential therapy with more than two agents and locoregional treatment was defined as multidisciplinary combination therapy (MCT), while systemic sequential therapy only and repeated locoregional treatment was defined as a single treatment procedure (STP). RESULTS: Patients classified as R and BR1 had significantly better overall survival (OS) compared with BR2 (R vs. BR2, p = 0.012; BR1 vs. BR2, p = 0.004). However, there was no significant difference between R and BR1 (p = 1.000), in spite of significantly worse oncological status in the BR1 patients. Following a R0 resection and MCT, the BR1 patients had significantly better OS compared with those receiving STP or no additional treatment (median OS, not reached vs. 25.2 months and 20.1 vs. 11.3 months, respectively; p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced HCC with intrahepatic target nodules the BR1 category is one of the favorable candidates for selecting those to be treated with MCT strategies.

Atezolizumab-Induced Ulcerative Colitis in Patient with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Case Report and Literature Review.

Background and Objectives: Immune check inhibitor (ICI) colitis is one of most common and adverse side effects of ICI. However, there was no case report of ulcerative colitis (UC)-mimicking colitis after atezolizumab use in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to our knowledge. Materials and Methods: We would like to introduce the case of a patient with Stage IV HCC who complained of abdominal pain, diarrhea and rectal bleeding after two cycles of atezolizumab/bevacizumab chemotherapy and was then diagnosed with UC-mimicking colitis. Results: Endoscopy revealed typical findings of UC, suggesting diagnosis of UC-mimicking colitis. The patient was treated with systemic steroids and oral mesalamine, which significantly improved his symptoms, which were also supported by endoscopic findings. The patient resumed chemotherapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab without any interruption to the chemotherapy schedule. Conclusions: Early endoscopic evaluation is pivotal to diagnosing UC-mimicking colitis. If diagnosed, UC-based treatments such as steroids and mesalamine should be strongly considered. Given previous reports of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) flare-ups after immunotherapy, routine lower endoscopy, performed together with upper endoscopy before atezolizumab/bevacizumab therapy, is promising to patients.

Five-year survival in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer treated with atezolizumab in the Phase III IMpower133 study and the Phase III IMbrella A extension study.

OBJECTIVES: IMbrella A is a Phase III extension study that allowed rollover from Roche/Genentech-sponsored atezolizumab trials, including IMpower133, a Phase I/III trial of first-line atezolizumab or placebo plus carboplatin/etoposide in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. We report outcomes from an exploratory analysis of IMpower133 with extended time-to-event data for patients who rolled over to IMbrella A. MATERIALS AND METHODS: IMpower133 patients could roll over to IMbrella A to receive atezolizumab 1200 mg intravenously every three weeks if they continued to receive atezolizumab at IMpower133 closure or were in survival follow-up after atezolizumab discontinuation. Overall survival and safety were assessed; only serious adverse events and AEs of special interest were collected in IMbrella A. RESULTS: Eighteen of 26 eligible patients rolled over to IMbrella A. At clinical cutoff (March 16, 2023), median follow-up in the atezolizumab plus carboplatin/etoposide arm (IMpower133 and IMbrella A) was 59.4 months. The three-, four-, and five-year overall survival (95 % CI) estimates were 16 % (11 %-21 %), 13 % (8 %-18 %), and 12 % (7 %-17 %), respectively. In IMbrella A, serious adverse events occurred in three patients (16.7 %), and one adverse event of special interest was reported (grade two hypothyroidism). CONCLUSION: This long-term analysis of patients from IMbrella A previously enrolled in IMpower133 provides the first report of five-year overall survival outcomes in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer treated with first-line cancer immunotherapy and chemotherapy. While limited by small patient numbers and lack of long-term data for the IMpower133 control arm, exploratory overall survival analyses in patients treated with atezolizumab plus carboplatin/etoposide compared favorably with historical data with chemotherapy alone. NCT03148418.