RESUMEN
Mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL) is a type of acute leukemia in which encompasses mixed features of myeloid, T-lymphoid, and/or B-lymphoid differentiation. Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) MPAL is a rare subgroup with a poor prognosis and accounts for ï¼1% of adult acute leukemia. Until now, there is still no consensus on how to best treat Ph+ MPAL. Here, we report a 62-year-old male with Ph+ (atypical e13a2 BCR-ABL1 fusion protein) MPAL. This patient presented with recurrent and intense bone pain due to bone marrow necrosis (BMN). Besides, he did not achieve a complete remission for the first two chemotherapies, until he received flumatinib combined with hyper-CVAD (B) (a dose-intensive regimen include methotrexate and cytarabine). To our knowledge, this is the first report to describe the coexistence of BMN and atypical e13a2 BCR-ABL1 transcripts in patients with MPAL. This finding will bring new understandings in the diagnosis and treatment of Ph+ MPAL.
Asunto(s)
Médula Ósea , Proteínas de Fusión bcr-abl , Necrosis , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteínas de Fusión bcr-abl/genética , Médula Ósea/patología , Leucemia Bifenotípica Aguda/genética , Leucemia Bifenotípica Aguda/patología , Leucemia Bifenotípica Aguda/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this report is to enhance our scientific understanding of the clinicopathologic features of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with the e12a3 transcript and to provide insights into potential treatment options for this rare subtype of CML. CASE SUMMARY: We present the case of a 21-year-old Chinese male patient who was diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with the e12a3 transcript. Biopsy of his left iliac soft tissue mass indicated that he was in the blast crisis phase of CML. The patient was treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) drugs and achieved remission, but relapsed soon after. Despite receiving prognostic chemotherapy, the disease progressed and eventually led to the patient's death. CONCLUSION: To avoid missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis, it is recommended to conduct a thorough clinical evaluation and actively identify the underlying etiology.
Asunto(s)
Proteínas de Fusión bcr-abl , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Proteínas de Fusión bcr-abl/genética , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/genética , Crisis Blástica/genética , Crisis Blástica/tratamiento farmacológico , Pronóstico , Inhibidores de Proteínas QuinasasRESUMEN
The presence of the translocation t(9;22)(q34;q11), leading to the BCR::ABL1 fusion transcript, is the hallmark of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Nevertheless, atypical presentation at diagnosis can be challenging. However, although most patients with CML are diagnosed with the e13a2 or e14a2 BCR::ABL1 fusion transcripts, about 5% of them carry rare BCR::ABL1 fusion transcripts, such as e19a2, e8a2, e13a3, e14a3, e1a3, and e6a2. In particular, the e6a2 fusion transcript has been associated with clinically aggressive disease frequently presenting in accelerated or blast crisis phases. To date, there is limited evidence on the efficacy of front-line second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors for this genotype. Here, we report two patients, in whom the diagnosis of CML was challenging. The use of primers recognizing more distant exons from the common BCR::ABL1 breakpoint region correctly identified the atypical BCR::ABL1 e6a2 fusion transcript. Treatment with the second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib was effective in our patient expressing the atypical e6a2 BCR::ABL1 fusion transcript.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Approximately 1-2% of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients harbor atypical BCR-ABL1 transcripts that cannot be monitored by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) using standard methodologies. Within the European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) for CML we established and validated robust RT-qPCR methods for these patients. METHODS: BCR-ABL1 transcripts were amplified and sequenced to characterize the underlying fusion. Residual disease monitoring was carried out by RT-qPCR with specific primers and probes using serial dilutions of appropriate BCR-ABL1 and GUSB plasmid DNA calibrators. Results were expressed as log reduction of the BCR-ABL1/GUSB ratio relative to the patient-specific baseline value and evaluated as an individual molecular response (IMR). RESULTS: In total, 330 blood samples (2-34 per patient, median 8) from 33 CML patients (19 male, median age 62 years) were analyzed. Patients expressed seven different atypical BCR-ABL1 transcripts (e1a2, n = 6; e6a2, n = 1; e8a2, n = 2; e13a3, n = 4; e14a3, n = 6; e13a3/e14a3, n = 2; e19a2, n = 12). Most patients (61%) responded well to TKI therapy and achieved an IMR of at least one log reduction 3 months after diagnosis. Four patients relapsed with a significant increase of BCR-ABL1/GUSB ratios. CONCLUSIONS: Characterization of atypical BCR-ABL1 transcripts is essential for adequate patient monitoring and to avoid false-negative results. The results cannot be expressed on the International Scale (IS) and thus the common molecular milestones and guidelines for treatment are difficult to apply. We, therefore, suggest reporting IMR levels in these cases as a time-dependent log reduction of BCR-ABL1 transcript levels compared to baseline prior to therapy.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Proteínas de Fusión bcr-abl/genética , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/patología , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , ARN Mensajero/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Proteínas de Fusión bcr-abl/antagonistas & inhibidores , Humanos , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/genética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BCR-ABL1 fusion transcript is the minimal residual disease marker in chronic myeloid leukemia; 2% of patients show unusual breakpoints generating atypical transcripts, not quantifiable by standardized real-time PCR (RT-PCR). Response monitoring is performed by non-quantitative NESTED PCR, useless for evaluating patients' molecular remission, excluding them from treatment-free-remission protocols. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is highly sensitive technology, allowing an absolute quantification independent of standard curves. Based on this, we have developed assays able to evaluate the molecular response in atypical patients. We designed new ddPCR-based molecular assays able to quantify atypical BCR-ABL1 transcripts, with a detection limit of 0.001%, validated in a cohort of 65 RNA from 11 patients. Fifty samples were identified congruently by ddPCR and NESTED PCR (40 positives and 10 negatives for atypical BCR-ABL1 transcript), while 11 positive samples were detected only by ddPCR. Our results highlight ddPCR usefulness, primarily when the BCR-ABL1/ABL1 level is less than 1.5% and NESTED PCR results are often inaccurate. Furthermore, we identified 3 patients who maintained a deep molecular response for at least one year, who could be considered good candidates for treatment-free remission approaches. Here, we describe a new promising molecular approach, highly sensitive, to monitor atypical BCR-ABL1 patients, paving the foundation to include them in treatment-free remission protocols.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome results from the reciprocal translocation t(9;22)(q34.1;q11.2) and is diagnostic for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, this translocation is also found in acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL), as well as in rare cases of acute myeloid leukemias (AML). Most patients with CML harbor either the e13a2 or the e14a2 BCR-ABL fusion product, while a small subset of the cases expresses e1a2 or e19a2 transcripts. Moreover, several atypical BCR-ABL1 transcripts, beside the most common e1a2, e13a2 and e14a2, have been described, mainly in patients with CML. However, ALL and de novo AML may also carry BCR-ABL1 atypical transcripts which will confer a poor prognosis. CASE PRESENTATION: A 78-years old male was admitted at our hospital with clinical and laboratory features allowing to make the diagnosis of AML. No evidence of a preceding CML (splenomegaly or basophilia) was found. The karyotype on G-banded metaphases was 46,XY, t(9;22)(q34;q11). While the molecular analysis was ongoing, the patient started treatment based on hydroxyurea followed by 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine. The molecular biology analysis revealed the simultaneous presence of the common p190 e1a2 and the rare e6a2 isoforms. Because of persistent pancytopenia and presence of blasts, according to the molecular data, he was then switched to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) treatment. Nevertheless, after 2 months, the patient was still refractory to second line treatment dying because of a pulmonary infection. CONCLUSION: The atypical p190 e6a2 transcript seems to be associated in AML with aggressive disease. TKI therapy alone does not seem to control the disease. Prompt observations on these patients carrying rare BCR-ABL1 transcripts may help to establish optimal treatment approaches on these aggressive BCR-ABL1 phenotypes in different setting of patients.