Axillary Artery Injury Encountered During Chest Wall Tumor Resection.

Axillary artery injuries are rare because of their anatomy but are sometimes fatal because of the difficulty of obtaining vascular integrity. We report a 50-year-old patient with an iatrogenic axillary arterial injury that occurred during the resection of a chest wall tumor. The injury occurred during an incision of the intercostal muscle along the superior margin of the second rib. Following primary hemostasis achieved by forceps and amputation of the pectoralis minor muscle, the injury site was exposed sufficiently and successfully repaired by a vascular surgeon. This successful case provided valuable insight into strategies, primary hemostasis, and subsequent revascularization for an intraoperative vascular injury.

PERCUTANEOUS AXILLARY ACCESS IN THE ENDOVASCULAR ERA: A VIABLE ALTERNATIVE?

BACKGROUND: The common femoral artery is the most commonly used vascular access due to its low complication rate and high technical success rate. However, this approach may be less suitable in patients with certain factors such as obesity, the need to treat both lower limbs, and the inability to access the lesion via crossover. In this context, endovascular approaches using percutaneous puncture or upper arm access have emerged. Therefore, we evaluated the feasibility of percutaneous access to the axillary artery in routine endovascular procedures. METHODS: This single-center observational study included consecutive patients requiring percutaneous access to the axillary artery for endovascular procedures from January 2020 to December 2023. Demographic and procedural characteristics were collected. The primary endpoint was efficacy (technical success rate) and safety (complications rate) at 30 days. Secondary endpoints were minor complications and risk factors of complications. RESULTS: 85 patients were included. Axillary approach was used to treat peripheral artery disease (PAD) in 77.6% (n=66), complex aortic aneurysm in 17.7% (n=15), and acute type B aortic dissection in 4.7% (n=4) of patients. This approach was used due to bilateral PAD treatment (n=20), obesity (n=18), prior EVAR (n=12), prior common femoral artery stenting (n=9), major iliac tortuosity (n=9), prior kissing stent (n=8), favorable angulation (n=5) and true lumen positioning in type B aortic dissection (n=4). The left axillary approach was used in 97.6% (n=83) of cases. The efficacy was 100%. At 30 days, safety was 85.6% with a major complication rate of 14.2% (n=12), including 10.6% (n=9) surgical conversion for hemostasis, 2.4% (n=2) covered stenting, and 1.2% (n=1) stroke. Body mass index was associated with a higher rate of complications (25.2 ± 6.17 vs. 29.0 ± 6.04, OR: 1.2 [1.05; 1.37] p=0.006). CONCLUSION: Axillary arteries are an effective alternative access route for patients with unsuitable iliofemoral arteries. Randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm our findings and to assess the best approach for the upper arm.

Management of Proximal Humerus Fracture With Concurrent Axillary Artery Injury Using a Saphenous Vein Graft and Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis: A Case Report.

This case report details the management of a 60-year-old male who sustained a complex proximal humerus fracture with an axillary artery injury following a fall. Initial assessment revealed a fractured humeral head and complete occlusion of the axillary artery, which was repaired using a saphenous vein graft. Subsequently, the patient underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) after the limb stabilized. The staged approach, prioritizing urgent vascular repair followed by delayed orthopedic intervention, proved effective. The patient achieved satisfactory functional recovery with an improved range of motion and no pain. This case highlights the importance of prompt diagnosis and treatment of vascular injuries in complex proximal humeral fractures and supports the use of saphenous vein grafting and RTSA as effective management strategies.

Axillary artery access considerations in Impella 5.5 insertion: Insights from exclusive axillary approach for successful support.

BACKGROUND: The Impella 5.5® is commonly inserted via the axillary artery (AX) in patients with cardiogenic shock. The right AX has traditionally been preferred to avoid crossing the aortic arch, and a minimum diameter of 7 mm has been recommended to accommodate the device (21 Fr). There is limited data on choice of laterality of access and AX size required, both in terms of technicality of the procedure as well as outcomes. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent Impella 5.5® implantation between December 2020 and February 2024 (N = 75). Data including demographics and outcomes were stratified both by diameter (small, <7 mm vs. normal, ≥7 mm) and laterality of access (right vs. left). Adverse events included stroke, limb ischemia, procedural bleeding or infection, and unplanned explant due to complications. Delivery time was defined as time from advancing the first wire to activation of the device. RESULTS: AX approach was attempted in all (N = 74) but one requiring innominate access, with a technical success rate of 95.9% (N = 71/74). The mean age was 58.8 ± 13.3 years, with 81.1% males. The median delivery time was 7.0 (25th, 75th percentiles: 4.0, 11.5) min with a median support duration of 13 (7.7, 24) days. Ten patients (13.5%) had a small AX, with a mean diameter of 6.3 ± 0.5 mm and were more likely to be younger compared to the normal AX group. Fifty-nine patients (79.7%) had insertion via the right AX. Median delivery time was comparable across all groups (small, 5.4 [3.5, 10.9] vs. normal, 7 [4.0, 12.1] min, p = 0.59) and (right, 10.4 [5.3, 15.2] vs. left, 6 [3.7, 10.4] min, p = 0.35). There was no difference between the rates of stroke, ischemia, bleeding, or infection when comparing by size or laterality. Survival to discharge was 59.5%, with 21.1% mortality on support, all in patients with a normal AX diameter, but with no difference between right versus left. CONCLUSION: In our study, laterality and a small diameter of AX access did not affect outcomes of Impella 5.5®, with a similar safety profile.

Percutaneous Cannulation of the Axillary Artery: Does the Position of the Brachial Plexus Correlate With Bony Landmarks That Could Be Used to Reduce the Risk of Complications?

Introduction Endovascular surgery is an innovative way of carrying out procedures such as transcatheter aortic valve insertion where the femoral artery is commonly used as an access point. Conditions like peripheral arterial disease can make endovascular procedures challenging when atherosclerotic plaques compromise the integrity of lower limb vessels. An alternative access point for these patients is required. Access through the axillary artery has been proposed; however, the close proximity of the brachial plexus introduces a risk of neural complications. This study aims to find an anatomical or bony landmark(s) to help identify an area of safety on the axillary artery that can be used to gain access. Materials and methods Nine cadavers were used in the study and five parameters were measured using the acromion and coracoid processes as bony landmarks. The 1st parameter measured the distance between the acromion and the coracoid process. The 2nd parameter was the diameter of the axillary artery taken at a plane extending from the acromion to the coracoid process - now defined as the coracoacromial plane. The 3rd measurement was the distance between the coracoid process and the midpoint of the axillary artery diameter taken at the above plane; it is proposed this will form a safe point on the axillary artery. The 4th parameter measured was the distance between the safe point on the axillary artery and the median nerve. The 5th parameter was the distance between the safe point and the thoracoacromial trunk. Measurements were taken using digital callipers and were recorded for both sides of the cadaver except for one. Using the data from the measurements, an area of safety was calculated and statistical analysis was carried out using Student's t-test and Pearson's correlation to look for significant differences between the left and right sides. Results The mean distance from the safe point of the axillary artery to the median nerve was 23.25 mm on the left and 27.10 mm on the right. The p-value was 0.7, which indicated no significant differences between both sides. The mean distance between the safe point and the thoracoacromial trunk was 11.31 mm on the left and 13.21 mm on the right. The p-value was 0.24, indicating no significant differences between both sides. The mean area of safety was larger on the right side with an area of 184.37 mm and smaller on the left side with an area of 158.93 mm. The p-value was 0.62, which indicated no significant differences between both sides. There was no clear relationship between the distance from the acromion to the coracoid process compared to the distance between the acromion and a defined safe point on the axillary artery. This was confirmed using a Pearson's correlation test, which resulted in a p-value of 0.53 on the left and 0.93 on the right. These values were above the critical value, suggesting no correlation. Conclusion The acromion and the coracoid process are important bony landmarks that can be used to define the coracoacromial plane that traverses the axillary artery whereby avoiding the cords of the brachial plexus, the median nerve as well as the thoracoacromial trunk. Implementing this approach to define a safe vascular access point on the axillary artery could minimise complications like brachial plexus injuries. Further studies on a larger sample size using radiological methods may need to be carried out to help increase confidence in these preliminary cadaveric findings.

Is there an association between arteriovenous fistulas and axillary artery aneurysms? A report of two cases.

INTRODUCTION: Axillary artery aneurysms are rare vascular conditions that can present with various clinical manifestations, including neurological deficits and vascular compromise. While the underlying pathophysiology remains complex and multifactorial, potential associations with trauma, arteriovenous fistula formation, and atherosclerosis have been reported. PRESENTATION OF CASE: Two male patients, aged 33 and 38, with a history of kidney transplantation and previous arteriovenous fistula (AVF) presented with symptoms of upper limb ischemia and neurological compromise. Imaging revealed large axillary artery aneurysms. Open surgical repair was performed for both cases. Two weeks after discharge, one patient showed good pronation and supination with mildly limited extension. The other patient's wrist drop gradually improved with physiotherapy. DISCUSSION: Multifactorial pathophysiology encompassed altered blood flow dynamics, inflammation, and the underlying vascular pathology. Chief complaints and prior vascular interventions contributed. Open surgical repair was preferred to endovascular approaches, achieving favorable outcomes. CONCLUSION: Axillary artery aneurysms in patients with a history of AVF are rare but potentially serious complications. The cases highlight the complexity of axillary artery aneurysms and the need for careful evaluation and surgical intervention This strategy is crucial to prevent potential complications and optimize patient outcomes. Further research is needed to elucidate the precise pathophysiology and the potential association between AVF and the subsequent development of axillary artery aneurysms. Increasing awareness among surgeons could enable earlier detection of aneurysms, thereby reducing the risk of complications.

Total aortic arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk technique for intramural haematoma of the thoracic aorta.

Presenting this video tutorial, we want to demonstrate a step-by-step surgical approach to acute intramural haematoma of the thoracic aorta without a definite entry tear. Limited by the aortic valve proximally, the intramural haematoma involved the aortic root, ascending aorta, aortic arch, including adjacent parts of supra-aortic branches, and descending aorta extending to the diaphragmatic level. The operative strategy involved urgent total aortic arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk technique and anatomical reimplantation of the three supra-aortic vessels. The direct open over-the-wire technique was used to cannulate the right axillary artery, and standard venous cannulation was performed while brain protection was achieved with bilateral selective antegrade cerebral perfusion.

The left axillary artery is a reasonable option as the inflow site for saphenous vein graft in minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting.

Introduction: This study aims to clarify the good inflow site for saphenous vein grafts (SVG) in minimally invasive off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (mini-CABG), between the ascending aorta, the internal thoracic arteries (ITAs) and the left axillary artery (LAA). Methods: This retrospective study included 126 patients who underwent Mini-CABG at our center between January 2014 and July 2023. Patients were divided into three groups according to the SVG inflow site for patency comparison: Aorta group (n = 56), LAA group (n = 23), and ITA group (n = 47). Results: There were 84 males, with mean age of 65.9 ± 7.0 years. There were no significant differences in preoperative characteristics between groups. Mean operation times were 254.6 ± 72.2, 213.7 ± 57.6, and 253.0 ± 81.2 min, and the average numbers of distal anastomoses were 2.9 ± 0.9, 2.4 ± 0.7 and 2.9 ± 1.1 in the Aorta, ITA and LAA groups respectively. Days in intensive care, hospital stay, and major complications did not differ between the groups. Early patency of SVG did not significantly differ among groups: 93.0% in the Aorta group, 98.0% in the ITA group, and 100% in the LAA group. Mean follow-up period was 136.7 ± 295.7 days, and follow-up coronary CTA revealed 18 SVG occlusions (Aorta group n = 8, ITA group n = 5, LAA group n = 5). The Kaplan-Meier curve for SVG patency rates did not show any significant differences among the three groups. Conclusion: The ascending aorta, the ITAs, and the LAA serve as reliable inflow sites with similar results in mini-CABG.

Outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation strategy in lung transplantation: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) with different cannulation strategies is determined according to surgical position and patient condition. However, no cannulation guidelines have been proposed. This retrospective study assessed the outcomes of diverse ECMO cannulation strategies in patients undergoing lung transplantation (LTx). METHODS: Data of patients undergoing intraoperative veno-arterial ECMO-assisted LTx were retrospectively collected from December 1st, 2015 to October 31st, 2021. Patients were classified into three groups based on the different cannulation strategies: femoral artery-femoral vein (F-F)-ECMO, axillary artery-femoral vein (A-F)-ECMO, and ascending aorta-femoral vein (AAO-F)-ECMO. The F-F-ECMO, A-F-ECMO, and AAO-F-ECMO groups comprised 34, 44, and 30 patients, respectively. MAIN RESULTS: The AAO-F-ECMO group exhibited a significantly shorter duration of postoperative ECMO therapy (3 vs. 2 vs. 0 days, P < 0.01).the level of postoperative proBNP was lower on the third and seventh days (P < 0.001). AAO-F-ECMO patients had a significantly lower incidence of postoperative infections, heart failure, and bleeding (P < 0.05). Similar outcomes were observed in postoperative survival rates among the three groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ascending aorta-femoral vein ECMO can provide sufficient and effective aerobic blood to perfuse organs with fewer side effects than cannulation in the femoral artery-femoral vein or axillary artery-femoral vein.

Axillary to Lateral Above Knee Popliteal Artery Bypass: An Alternative Approach to Lower Extremity Revascularization.

OBJECTIVE: Management of limb ischemia in the setting of malignancy with history of resection and/or radiation presents a unique challenge. Radiation arteritis contributing to limb ischemia may not respond to endovascular intervention. Furthermore, significant tissue scarring from extensive resection and/or radiation can increase the risk of complications with open intervention and limit revascularization options. Utilization of an axillary to popliteal artery bypass using a lateral approach to the popliteal artery has been described as a reasonable alternative in these challenging cases. CASE REPORT: The patient is a 68-year-old male with history of liposarcoma of the left groin, scrotum, and medial thigh for which he underwent multiple resections, flap reconstruction, and skin graft. He had a recurrence 2 years later and underwent repeat resection, placement of brachytherapy catheters, vertical rectus abdominal flap, and external beam radiation. He now presents with Rutherford 2B acute limb ischemia with associated left foot drop. Computed tomography angiography was performed and revealed an occluded left common femoral artery stent, proximal left superficial and deep femoral artery occlusion, and thrombosis of the left femoral vein. An attempt was made at endovascular recanalization without success. He subsequently underwent left axillary-to-lateral above knee popliteal artery bypass with a 6 mm ringed polytetrafluoroethylene graft, tibial thrombectomy, and 4 compartment fasciotomy. RESULTS: Post-operatively, his pain resolved. He continued to have left foot drop but recovered his ability to ambulate with a walker. He was ultimately discharged on post-operative day 11 to an inpatient rehabilitation facility on aspirin and apixaban. CONCLUSION: Hostile groin secondary to infection, malignancy requiring resection/radiation presents a unique challenge for revascularization. When endovascular revascularization or obturator bypass are not feasible options, axillary-to-lateral above knee popliteal artery bypass is a described, feasible alternative approach to restore blood flow in this challenging patient population.

Complex Variations in Branches of the Axillary Artery / Variaciones Complejas en Ramas de la Arteria Axilar

SUMMARY: The axillary artery is a continuation of the subclavian artery and transitions into the brachial artery. Variations in the axillary artery are not uncommon. During the upper-limb dissection of a 95-year-old Korean female cadaver, assorted anatomical variations of the axillary artery branches were identified. On the right side, no branches emerged from the first part of the axillary artery. The thoracoacromial artery (excluding the pectoral branch) and the common subscapular trunk arose from the second part, with the common subscapular trunk giving origins to the pectoral branch, lateral thoracic artery, and subscapular artery. The subscapular artery is divided into the thoracodorsal artery, circumflex scapular artery, and accessory posterior circumflex humeral artery. Additionally, the superior thoracic artery arose from the lateral thoracic artery. The third part of the axillary artery gave rise to the anterior and posterior circumflex humeral arteries, accessory acromial branch, and accessory thoracodorsal artery. On the left side, the thoracoacromial artery (excluding the pectoral branch) and the superior thoracic artery arose from the first part. The common subscapular trunk arose from the second part, which included the pectoral branch, lateral thoracic artery, and subscapular artery. The subscapular artery is divided into the thoracodorsal artery, circumflex scapular artery, accessory posterior circumflex humeral artery, and accessory lateral thoracic artery. The third part gave rise to the anterior and posterior circumflex humeral arteries and the accessory acromial branch. This study presents variations of the axillary artery, emphasizing their rarity, considering their embryologic basis, and highlighting their importance not only for educational purposes but also surgical and radiological applications.

La arteria axilar es una continuación de la arteria subclavia y luego esta continua como arteria braquial. Las variaciones en la arteria axilar no son infrecuentes. Durante la disección de los miembros superiores de un cadáver de una mujer coreana de 95 años, se identificaron diversas variaciones anatómicas de las ramas de la arteria axilar. En el lado derecho no se originaban ramas de la primera parte de la arteria axilar. La arteria toracoacromial (excluyendo la rama pectoral) y el tronco subescapular común surgieron de la segunda parte, y el tronco subescapular común dio origen a la rama pectoral, la arteria torácica lateral y la arteria subescapular. La arteria subescapular se dividía en arteria toracodorsal, arteria circunfleja escapular y arteria humeral circunfleja posterior accesoria. Además, la arteria torácica superior se originaba de la arteria torácica lateral. La tercera parte de la arteria axilar dio origen a las arterias circunflejas humerales anterior y posterior, la rama acromial accesoria y la arteria toracodorsal accesoria. En el lado izquierdo, de la primera parte surgían la arteria toracoacromial (excluyendo la rama pectoral) y la arteria torácica superior. De la segunda parte se originaba el tronco subescapular común, que incluía la rama pectoral, la arteria torácica lateral y la arteria subescapular. La arteria subescapular se dividía en arteria toracodorsal, arteria circunfleja escapular, arteria circunfleja humeral posterior accesoria y arteria torácica lateral accesoria. La tercera parte daba origen a las arterias circunflejas humerales anterior y posterior y a la rama acromial accesoria. Este estudio presenta variaciones de la arteria axilar, enfatizando su rareza, considerando su base embriológica y destacando su importancia no sólo para fines educativos sino también para aplicaciones quirúrgicas y radiológicas.

Axillary compared to brachial access for endovascular procedures.

OBJECTIVES: Limited knowledge exists regarding access site complication rates between trans-axillary and trans-brachial approaches with sheath sizes ≥6Fr. We retrospectively reviewed our institution experience with access site complications for percutaneous trans-axillary and trans-brachial arterial interventions using sheath sizes ranging from 6Fr to 10Fr. METHODS: We examined 67 endovascular interventions performed over 18 months, restricted to sheath sizes of 6Fr to 10Fr. Procedures utilizing trans-brachial (41 cases) and trans-axillary (26 cases) approaches under sonographic guidance were included. Cases involving hemodialysis accesses and those requiring surgical cut-down were excluded. The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of major access site complications (SIR grade-II/III) within 30 days, with data collected on hemostasis method, sheath size, and complications. Statistical analysis involved ANCOVA and Fisher's exact tests, with significance set at p < .05. RESULTS: Successful percutaneous arterial access was achieved in all cases using either approach (trans-axillary or trans-brachial). Closure devices were employed in all axillary punctures and in 71% of brachial punctures. Major access site complications occurred in 7 out of 41 cases (17%) in the trans-brachial group and in 4 out of 26 cases (15%) in the trans-axillary group. However, there was no statistically significant difference in complication rates between the two groups, regardless of access site or sheath size. CONCLUSION: Trans-axillary access serves as a safe and effective upper limb access method for percutaneous endovascular procedures requiring sheath size of 7Fr or larger when compared to trans-brachial approach.

Aortic versus axillary artery cannulation for hemiarch replacement: single-centre real-world experience.

BACKGROUND: Aortic arch disease is a major cause of acute dissections. Surgical replacement is the current curative treatment for aortic arch disease. While traditional aortic cannulation ensures lower body perfusion, axillary cannulation offers optimum cerebral perfusion. AIM: To evaluate the outcomes of aortic and axillary cannulation methods in hemiarch replacements, focusing on postoperative perfusion and survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 91 patients who underwent hemiarch replacement surgery between February 2007 and October 2016. Patients were divided into two groups based on the cannulation method: aortic cannulation (54 patients) and axillary cannulation (37 patients). Data regarding preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters were analyzed, including demographics, surgical outcomes, and complications. RESULTS: Demographic analysis showed comparable characteristics between the two groups, with notable differences in aortic disease severity and classification. Patients in the axillary group had a larger ascending aorta diameter (57.7 ± 10.8 mm vs. 51.8 ± 5.7 mm, p = 0.002) and a higher prevalence of acute dissections (27.0% (n = 10) vs. 3.7% (n = 2), p = 0.001). Cerebral protection methods varied significantly between the two groups (p < 0.001). Antegrade cerebral perfusion was used in 37.8% (n = 14) of the axillary group compared to 3.7% (n = 2) of the central group. The central cannulation group had a higher proportion of patients with temperatures under 20 °C (98.1% (n = 53) vs. 21.6% (n = 8), p < 0.001), whereas the axillary group maintained higher temperatures (24 -28 °C) in 68.6% (n = 23) of cases. AV repair/replacement was more frequent in the aortic cannulation group (48.2% (n = 26) vs. 18.9% (n = 7), p = 0.013). No significant disparities were observed in operative mortality or intraoperative complications. Statistical analysis showed no significant differences between the two groups in the in-hospital outcomes, but renal complications were more prevalent in the axillary cannulation group with 21.6% (n = 8) experiencing acute kidney injury compared to 9.3% (n = 5) in the central group (p = 0.098). The overall survival rate was slightly higher in the aortic cannulation group at various follow-up periods, yet no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups. CONCLUSION: We found no significant differences in safety and efficacy between axillary cannulation and aortic cannulation in hemiarch replacement procedures.

The Impact of Ipsilateral Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Axillary Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Support as Bridge to Heart Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The axillary artery (AX) access for intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) as a bridge to heart transplant (HT) allows mobility while awaiting a suitable donor. As end-stage heart failure patients often have an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) on the left side, the left AX approach may be avoided due to the perception of difficult access and proximity of two devices. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients bridged to HT with a left-sided AX IABP with or without ipsilateral ICDs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed HT candidates at our institution supported by left-sided axillary IABP from November 2019 to February 2024, dividing them into two groups based on the presence (Group ICD, n = 48) or absence (Group No-ICD, N = 19) of an ipsilateral left-sided ICD. The exposure time was defined as the time from skin incision to the beginning of anastomoses of a Dacron graft. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 100% of the cohort, with median exposure times for AX access similar between groups (ICD, 12 [7.8, 18.2] vs. No ICD, 11 [7, 19] min; p = 0.75). The rate of procedural adverse events, such as significant access site bleeding and ipsilateral limb ischemia, did not significantly differ between both groups. Device malfunction rates were comparable (ICD, 29.2% vs. No ICD, 15.8%; p = 0.35). Posttransplant, in-hospital mortality, severe primary graft dysfunction, and stroke rates were comparable in both groups. CONCLUSION: The presence of an ipsilateral left-sided ICD does not adversely impact the procedural efficacy, complication rates, or posttransplant outcomes of left-sided AX IABP insertion in HT candidates.

Cords of the Brachial Plexus and Their Branches Positioned Laterally to the Axillary Artery.

The brachial plexus, which supplies the upper limb, extends from the interscalene triangle in the root of the neck to the axilla and is closely related to the subclavian and axillary arteries. Variations in the formation, branching pattern, and relations are profound, and it is generally stated that variant anatomy of the plexus appears to be a rule rather than an exception. In previous studies, it was hypothesized that the anomalous development of the subclavian-axillary stem and the persistence of intersegmental arteries could induce variations in the plexus. In this study, all three cords of the brachial plexus (lateral, medial, and posterior) and their terminal branches are consistently found lateral to the third part of the axillary artery. Most of the studies reported variation in one or the other cord or its branches, but very few studies have reported about all cords lateral to the brachial plexus. The brachial plexus variations are usually also associated with the variations in the branches of the axillary artery, but in this study, no such variation is noted in the branches of the axillary artery. These differences impact the methods of surgery and the application of regional anesthesia. For successful outcomes, it is important to know how neurovascular relationships work, such as where the cords are in relation to the axillary artery. We report an interesting case of all cords and their branches positioned lateral to the axillary artery in the axilla in an adult male cadaver.

Ultrasonography of the superficial temporal and axillary arteries in giant cell arteritis diagnosis.

OBJECTIVES: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the main systemic vasculitis in individuals aged ≥ 50 years. Color Doppler ultrasound (CDS) has an established role in GCA diagnosis and management. This study aims to assess the clinical characteristics associated with a positive CDS evaluation and the impact of additional axillary artery examination on diagnostic sensitivity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing CDS of the superficial temporal arteries, with or without axillary artery assessment, at our hospital, between 2009 and 2023. Patients meeting the new 2022 diagnostic criteria for GCA were included and their characteristics were analyzed according to the presence of the halo sign on CDS. RESULTS: Of the 135 included patients (54 % female, mean age 75 ± 8 years), the halo sign was observed in 57 %, correlating with higher systemic symptom prevalence (61 % vs 42 %, p = 0.035), lower hemoglobin (p < 0.001), and higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p = 0.028). The halo sign inversely related to prior corticosteroid therapy (p = 0.033). Patients with axillary halo sign had fewer external carotid symptoms and a higher vertebral halo sign prevalence. Vertebral halo sign was associated with posterior circulation ischemic stroke (65 %, p < 0.001). Axillary artery studies improved diagnostic sensitivity by 9 %. CONCLUSION: In our study, the halo sign correlated with higher systemic symptoms and analytical abnormalities. Axillary artery examination enhanced CDS sensitivity, linked to severe outcomes like stroke. Prior corticosteroid therapy reduced CDS sensitivity. The correlation of clinical, laboratory, and ultrasound findings provides a more comprehensive understanding of GCA pathogenesis and evolution.

Myopericytoma of the axillary artery in a 4-year-old girl presenting with stroke and subsequent progression of micro-isolated lesion.

A 4-year-old girl presented with complaints of transient speech disorder and left-sided weakness. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed multiple strokes, computed tomography showed a right axillary artery aneurysm of 40 mm, and an angiogram indicated retrograde embolism. She underwent aneurysm resection and reconstruction with a saphenous vein graft. Two years after surgery, a mass lesion occurred in the native artery on the proximal side of the prior surgical anastomosis. Surgical resection and reconstruction were performed. An isolated 1-mm diameter lesion was found in the retrospectively reviewed completion angiogram from the initial surgery, which was the origin of the subsequent progressive lesion. The pathological examination, including after the initial surgery, revealed a myopericytoma.

Analysis of the Characteristics and Intricacies of Arrangement of Neural Elements in the Costoclavicular Block Using Ultrasound: A Retrospective Qualitative Study.

Background: Ultrasound (US)-guided costoclavicular block (CCB) is a promising new approach to brachial plexus (BP) block which is increasingly being utilized. Conventionally, the costoclavicular space (CCS) has been described to contain three cords. However, there may be variations in the neural pattern of the BP which is important to know to prevent inadvertent injury. We intend to describe the variations in neural patterns from retrospective scans of patients receiving costoclavicular BP block. Methods: The stored US images of patients who had received BP block using the CCB for surgery at the level of the elbow or below in the last year (from March 2021 to March 2022) were analyzed by two investigators independently. The clinical data were retrieved from the records of the same patients for the study outcomes. We collated the variations of the neural pattern, the number of neural structures seen, and the echogenicity of the structures in the costoclavicular BP space. Results: In the CCS, the median number of neural structures was 4.5 (minimum of 3 to maximum of 8). With the BP lateral to the axillary artery and sandwiched between the subclavius-pectoralis minor superiorly and the serratus anteriorly inferiorly, numerous variations in the neural structures were noted. The most common arrangement was caterpillar-like (28.6%) and pecker-like (20.3%). The neural structures were found to be hypoechoic in the majority (66%). Conclusion: The CCS hosts several mostly hypoechoic neural structures which may be the variations of the cords or the extension of BP divisions. These new findings have been unreported in the recent past.

Is axillary artery cannulation necessary in type II hybrid aortic arch repair for acute type A aortic dissection?

INTRODUCTION: Axillary artery cannulation (AAC) has been widely employed in total arch replacement surgeries using the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD), showing better clinical results than femoral artery cannulation (FAC). Nevertheless, in type II hybrid arch repair (HAR), FAC is crucial for lower body perfusion. Hence, it is unclear whether AAC remains necessary or if AAC represents a more advantageous method for initiating cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: We conducted a study involving patients diagnosed with ATAAD who underwent type II HAR from August 2021 to December 2022. Demographic baseline and intraoperative data were collected, and the postoperative outcomes of patients receiving FAC only were compared with those receiving AAC. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline demographics between patients who underwent FAC alone (n = 46) and those who underwent AAC (n = 39). Patients who underwent AAC showed a lower incidence of transient neurological dysfunction (TND) post-surgery compared to those who underwent FAC (12.8% vs 32.6%, p = .032). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of postoperative mortality within 30 days, permanent neurological dysfunction (PND), length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and postoperative ward, duration of mechanical ventilation, and other complications. CONCLUSIONS: Axillary artery cannulation may decrease the incidence of postoperative transient neurological dysfunction (TND) in type II HAR for ATAAD. Nonetheless, studies with larger sample sizes are necessary.

An unusual relationship between the axillary artery and brachial plexus in a cross-breed dog cadaver: a proposal for revising the terminology for nerve loops.

In the left axilla of a formalin-embalmed adult female cross-breed dog, an unusual course of the axillary artery in relation to the brachial plexus was noted. A part of the axillary artery after the origin of the subscapular artery coursed through the loop formed by the contributions of the caudal pectoral and lateral thoracic nerves and then between the median and ulnar nerves. Thus, the common trunk for the latter two nerves was missing. Instead, in the proximal brachium, they communicated with each other in both directions. A communicating branch between the cranial and caudal pectoral nerves forming a nerve loop, ansa pectoralis lacked the axillary artery and was instead traversed by the subscapular artery. This is a variation in the relationship between the axillary artery and brachial plexus in the domestic dog and has not been reported in the literature yet. The axillary artery entrapped by the contributions of the caudal and lateral thoracic nerves may be considered as a risk factor for the neuroarterial compressions with non-specific signs and should be taken into account both in surgery and imaging.