Pharmacological Trends in the Management of Atopic Dermatitis: A Comprehensive Review.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a prevalent, chronic inflammatory skin condition characterized by pruritus, erythema, and impaired skin barrier function. AD management presents significant challenges due to its complex pathophysiology involving immune dysregulation and genetic predispositions. While traditional therapies, such as topical corticosteroids and emollients, remain foundational, their limitations have spurred the development of novel pharmacological approaches. This comprehensive review explores current pharmacological trends in the management of AD, focusing on emerging therapies that target specific immunological pathways. Biologic agents, including monoclonal antibodies against interleukin (IL)-4, IL-13, and IL-31 receptors, offer targeted mechanisms to modulate immune responses implicated in AD pathogenesis. Janus kinase (JAK) and phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE-4) inhibitors represent another class of promising therapies, providing alternatives for patients resistant to conventional treatments. The review synthesizes evidence from clinical trials and studies to evaluate these pharmacological agents' efficacy and safety profiles. Considerations for personalized medicine approaches, including biomarkers for treatment response prediction and genotype-based therapies, are discussed to highlight the potential for tailored treatment strategies in AD management. In conclusion, this review underscores the evolving landscape of pharmacological interventions for AD, emphasizing the need for continued research to address unmet clinical needs and optimize patient outcomes. By delineating current advancements and future directions, this review aims to inform clinical practice and guide future research endeavours in dermatology.

Biomolecular therapies for chronic discogenic low back pain: A narrative review.

Chronic low back pain caused by intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration, also termed chronic discogenic low back pain (CD-LBP), is one of the most prevalent musculoskeletal diseases. Degenerative processes in the IVD, such as inflammation and extra-cellular matrix breakdown, result in neurotrophin release. Local elevated neurotrophin levels will stimulate sprouting and innervation of sensory neurons. Furthermore, sprouted sensory nerves that are directly connected to adjacent dorsal root ganglia have shown to increase microglia activation, contributing to the maintenance and chronification of pain. Current pain treatments have shown to be insufficient or inadequate for long-term usage. Furthermore, most therapeutic approaches aimed to target the underlying pathogenesis of disc degeneration focus on repair and regeneration and neglect chronic pain. How biomolecular therapies influence the degenerative IVD environment, pain signaling cascades, and innervation and excitability of the sensory neurons often remains unclear. This review addresses the relatively underexplored area of chronic pain treatment for CD-LBP and summarizes effects of therapies aimed for CD-LBP with special emphasis on chronic pain. Approaches based on blocking pro-inflammatory mediators or neurotrophin activity have been shown to hamper neuronal ingrowth into the disc. Furthermore, the tissue regenerative and neuro inhibitory properties of extracellular matrix components or transplanted mesenchymal stem cells are potentially interesting biomolecular approaches to not only block IVD degeneration but also impede pain sensitization. At present, most biomolecular therapies are based on acute IVD degeneration models and thus do not reflect the real clinical chronic pain situation in CD-LBP patients. Future studies should aim at investigating the effects of therapeutic interventions applied in chronic degenerated discs containing established sensory nerve ingrowth. The in-depth understanding of the ramifications from biomolecular therapies on pain (chronification) pathways and pain relief in CD-LBP could help narrow the gap between the pre-clinical bench and clinical bedside for novel CD-LBP therapeutics and optimize pain treatment.

Comment on Maghsoudlou et al. Titled "Uveitis Associated with Monogenic Autoinflammatory Syndromes in Children".

The work by Maghsoudlou et al. provides a comprehensive examination of monogenic autoinflammatory syndromes (MAIS) in children, with a specific focus on uveitis as a significant clinical manifestation. It meticulously details the genetic underpinnings, clinical features, diagnostic criteria, and current therapeutic strategies, including the use of biologics. This critique highlights the strengths of the review and suggests further exploration in areas such as long-term treatment outcomes, genotype-phenotype correlations, and the impact of MAIS on quality of life. Future research could benefit from longitudinal studies and enhanced predictive models to improve management and treatment personalization.

Emerging biologic frontiers for Sjogren's syndrome: Unveiling novel approaches with emphasis on extra glandular pathology.

Primary Sjögren's Syndrome (pSS) is a complex autoimmune disorder characterized by exocrine gland dysfunction, leading to dry eyes and mouth. Despite growing interest in biologic therapies for pSS, FDA approval has proven challenging due to trial complications. This review addresses the absence of a molecular-target-based approach to biologic therapy development and highlights novel research on drug targets and clinical trials. A literature search identified potential pSS treatment targets and recent advances in molecular understanding. Overlooking extraglandular symptoms like fatigue and depression is a notable gap in trials. Emerging biologic agents targeting cytokines, signal pathways, and immune responses have proven efficacy. These novel therapies could complement existing methods for symptom alleviation. Improved grading systems accounting for extraglandular symptoms are needed. The future of pSS treatment may involve gene, stem-cell, and tissue-engineering therapies. This narrative review offers insights into advancing pSS management through innovative biologic interventions.

Posterior Scleritis: A Case Report and Literature Review of the Management of the Condition.

Posterior scleritis is a rare inflammatory eye condition affecting the posterior segments of the sclera and is more prevalent in females. Its clinical presentation, often nonspecific, includes ocular pain, headache, and vision loss. Misdiagnosis is common due to a lack of specific symptoms posing a potential threat to vision. The etiology is often tied to rheumatic diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic erythematous lupus (SLE), and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated vasculitis. Posterior scleritis poses diagnostic challenges, mimicking many other ocular conditions, hence necessitating a thorough clinical eye exam. Laboratory studies, including inflammatory markers and markers of rheumatic diseases, may identify underlying systemic diseases. Imaging, including B-scan ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), aids in accurate diagnosis. Treatment involves non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), as well as topical corticosteroids for mild disease and systemic corticosteroids for severe disease. Biologic therapy has become increasingly significant for refractory cases. A multidisciplinary approach involving ophthalmology and rheumatology is crucial in the management of this potential sight-threatening disease. This case report highlights a 46-year-old woman with a history of RA-associated posterior scleritis.

Long-term efficacy and safety of subcutaneous tocilizumab in clinical trials of polyarticular or systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab (SC-TCZ) treatment in a long-term extension (LTE) of clinical trials in polyarticular or systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA, sJIA). METHODS: Patients with pJIA or sJIA from two open-label, 52-week phase 1 b core trials of SC-TCZ who had adequate response per investigator assessment entered the LTE and continued SC-TCZ treatment according to body weight-based dosing regimens until commercial availability or up to 5 years. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy were assessed for up to 3 years and safety for up to 5 years in the LTE. RESULTS: Forty-four patients with pJIA and 38 patients with sJIA entered the LTE. Tocilizumab trough concentrations were maintained within the range expected to provide clinical benefit (mean values: pJIA, ∼10 µg/ml; sJIA, ∼75 µg/ml over 3 years). Pharmacodynamic parameters (interleukin-6, soluble interleukin-6 receptor, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein) were maintained throughout the LTE at levels achieved in the core trials. Inactive disease per American College of Rheumatology provisional criteria was reported for 90% (17/19) and 53% (8/15) of patients with pJIA and 91% (10/11) and 92% (12/13) of patients with sJIA in the <30 kg and ≥30 kg body weight groups, respectively. Serious adverse events in the LTE were reported in six patients with pJIA (13.6%; five serious infections) and five patients with sJIA (13.2%; one serious infection). CONCLUSION: Patients with pJIA or sJIA experienced long-term disease control with SC-TCZ treatment. Long-term safety was consistent with the known tocilizumab safety profile.

Assessing the steroid-sparing effect of biological agents in randomized controlled trials for lupus: a scoping review.

Prompt disease control of flares in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a priority in treatment strategy planning. However, the long-term dosage-related collateral effects of glucocorticoids (GCs) have pushed researchers towards the identification and utilization of novel biological agents that could both induce and maintain low disease activity and remission, especially in the context of lupus nephritis (LN). This scoping review aims at assessing the current evidence of the potential steroid-sparing effect of biologic therapies by reviewing phase II and phase III randomized, placebo-controlled trials involving SLE/LN patients. A scoping review of the literature was carried out in accordance with PRISMA-ScR recommendations. Risk of bias was assessed through the utilization of the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria and were included in this analysis (treatment drug, 7 belimumab; 1 anifrolumab). Four studies showed a definite steroid-sparing effect (treatment drug, 3 belimumab; 1 anifrolumab), while in the remaining four RCTs, the steroid-sparing effect was not observed. When focusing on phase III trials, the overall quality of the studies resulted fair or good considering the risk of bias. However, a degree of heterogeneity of steroid regimen protocol (considering initial dosage, tapering and rescue treatment allowance) was observed. While a growing body of evidence is supporting the safety and efficacy of biological treatment in SLE, the evidence on their steroid-sparing effect remains scattered. Future research needs to pursue the identification of precise SLE clusters of patients who would benefit most from a specific treatment protocol with a definite steroid-sparing effect.

Generalized Pustular Psoriasis, Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis, and Other Pustular Reactions: A Clinical Review.

Generalized pustular rashes have various etiologies and can be challenging to diagnose and manage at first presentation. The authors provide an in-depth analysis of common pustular skin eruptions including generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, focusing on their pathophysiology, triggers, clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges, and management strategies. The article also highlights recent advances in genetic research and biologic therapies for GPP and the future directions in personalized medicine and prevention strategies.

Adverse events of biologic or small molecule therapies in clinical trials for inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Biologic or small-molecule therapies are highly effective for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and approval by the FDA has significantly increased both their clinical use and the development of novel regimens. However, the identification and management of their associated toxicities poses challenges for clinicians and researchers. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from January 1, 2000, to October 15, 2022, and in the databases. A random-effects model with logit transformation was applied to the analysis heterogeneity between studies was evaluated using the I2 statistic with incidence and 95 % confidence interval (CI) for any adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs (SAEs). Results: In Crohn's disease (CD), the total AE incidence was 67.0 % (95 % CI, 66.2%-67.8 %; I2 = 97.2 %) for any AEs and 7.3 % (6.9-7.7; 97.2) for serious AEs. In ulcerative colitis (UC), the overall incidence of any and serious AEs was 63.6 % (63.0-64.3; 98.1) and 5.7 % (5.4-6.0; 88.9), respectively. The most common AEs were infections (21.5 [20.3-22.8], 32.6 [31.0-34.2], 25.9 [24.5-27.2], and 13.7 [10.7-16.7]) in CD patients that were treated with TNF antagonists, anti-integrins, anti-IL agents, and JAK inhibitors, respectively, and in UC patients also were infections (22.8 [21.7-24.0], 27.4 [25.9-28.9], and 18.4 [16.7-20.2]), respectively, as well as increases in lactic dehydrogenase levels (23.1 [20.8-25.4]) with JAK inhibitors. Conclusion: This study offers a comprehensive summary of toxic side effects of IBD treatments and a useful reference for both patients and clinicians.

Selection strategy of second-line biologic therapies in adult patients with ulcerative colitis following prior biologic treatment failure: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Optimizing second-line biologic therapies for adult ulcerative colitis (UC) post first-line failure is essential. OBJECTIVE: Compare second-line biologic therapy efficacy in adult UC patients with prior treatment failure. METHODS: A comprehensive search of electronic databases up to May 2023 was conducted to assess second-line biologic therapy efficacy using a random effects model. Parameters analyzed included clinical remission rate, clinical response rate, mucosal healing rate, annual discontinuation rate, and colectomy rates. RESULTS: Forty-three research papers were analyzed. Clinical remission rates for second-line biologics were ranked at 6-14 weeks: Infliximab (30%) was followed by Vedolizumab (29%), Ustekinumab (27%), and Adalimumab (19%). At 52-54 weeks, the order shifted, with Vedolizumab (35%) followed by Infliximab (32%), Ustekinumab (31%), and Adalimumab (26%). The mucosal healing rate was 21%, ranked as: Infliximab (31%), Vedolizumab (21%), Adalimumab (21%), and Ustekinumab (14%). The annual discontinuation rate stood at 20%, with Adalimumab (25%), Vedolizumab (18%), Infliximab (17%), and Ustekinumab (16%). Discontinuation rates due to primary failure (PF), secondary failure (SF), and adverse events (AE) were 6%, 12%, and 3%, respectively. The annual colectomy rate was 9%, with Adalimumab (15%) followed by Vedolizumab (10%), Ustekinumab (9%), and Infliximab (5%), and colectomy rates of 10% due to PF, 12% due to SF, and 4% due to AE. CONCLUSION: For UC patients with first-line treatment failure, it is recommended to prioritize infliximab or vedolizumab as second-line biologic therapies, while avoiding adalimumab as the primary choice. Further clinical trials are necessary to assess ustekinumab efficacy accurately.

A Quantum-Enhanced Precision Medicine Application to Support Data-Driven Clinical Decisions for the Personalized Treatment of Advanced Knee Osteoarthritis: The Development and Preliminary Validation of precisionKNEE_QNN.

Background Quantum computing and quantum machine learning (QML) are promising experimental technologies that can improve precision medicine applications by reducing the computational complexity of algorithms driven by big, unstructured, real-world data. The clinical problem of knee osteoarthritis is that, although some novel therapies are safe and effective, the response is variable, and defining the characteristics of an individual who will respond remains a challenge. In this study, we tested a quantum neural network (QNN) application to support precision data-driven clinical decisions to select personalized treatments for advanced knee osteoarthritis. Methodology After obtaining patients' consent and Research Ethics Committee approval, we collected the clinicodemographic data before and after the treatment from 170 patients eligible for knee arthroplasty (Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥3, Oxford Knee Score (OKS) ≤27, age ≥64 years, and idiopathic aetiology of arthritis) treated over a two-year period with a single injection of microfragmented fat. Gender classes were balanced (76 males and 94 females) to mitigate gender bias. A patient with an improvement ≥7 OKS was considered a responder. We trained our QNN classifier on a randomly selected training subset of 113 patients to classify responders from non-responders (73 responders and 40 non-responders) in pain and function at one year. Outliers were hidden from the training dataset but not from the validation set. Results We tested our QNN classifier on a randomly selected test subset of 57 patients (34 responders, 23 non-responders) including outliers. The no information rate was 0.59. Our application correctly classified 28 responders out of 34 and 6 non-responders out of 23 (sensitivity = 0.82, specificity = 0.26, F1 Statistic = 0.71). The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 1.11 and 0.68, respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio was 2. Conclusions Preliminary results on a small validation dataset showed that QML applied to data-driven clinical decisions for the personalized treatment of advanced knee osteoarthritis is a promising technology to reduce computational complexity and improve prognostic performance. Our results need further research validation with larger, real-world unstructured datasets, as well as clinical validation with an artificial intelligence clinical trial to test model efficacy, safety, clinical significance, and relevance at a public health level.

Cartilaginous endplates: A comprehensive review on a neglected structure in intervertebral disc research.

The cartilaginous endplates (CEP) are key components of the intervertebral disc (IVD) necessary for sustaining the nutrition of the disc while distributing mechanical loads and preventing the disc from bulging into the adjacent vertebral body. The size, shape, and composition of the CEP are essential in maintaining its function, and degeneration of the CEP is considered a contributor to early IVD degeneration. In addition, the CEP is implicated in Modic changes, which are often associated with low back pain. This review aims to tackle the current knowledge of the CEP regarding its structure, composition, permeability, and mechanical role in a healthy disc, how they change with degeneration, and how they connect to IVD degeneration and low back pain. Additionally, the authors suggest a standardized naming convention regarding the CEP and bony endplate and suggest avoiding the term vertebral endplate. Currently, there is limited data on the CEP itself as reported data is often a combination of CEP and bony endplate, or the CEP is considered as articular cartilage. However, it is clear the CEP is a unique tissue type that differs from articular cartilage, bony endplate, and other IVD tissues. Thus, future research should investigate the CEP separately to fully understand its role in healthy and degenerated IVDs. Further, most IVD regeneration therapies in development failed to address, or even considered the CEP, despite its key role in nutrition and mechanical stability within the IVD. Thus, the CEP should be considered and potentially targeted for future sustainable treatments.

Ivosidenib in acute myeloid leukemia.

INTRODUCTION: Traditional treatment strategies for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have primarily relied on standard chemotherapy regimens for four decades. Indeed, the landscape of AML therapy has evolved substantially in recent years, mainly due to the introduction of hypomethylating agents and small molecules.Bcl2 inhibitor venetoclax, Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitors such as midostaurin and gilteritinib, and isocitrate dehydrogenases 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2) inhibitors ivosidenib and enasidenib, as well as hedgehog (HH) pathway inhibitor glasdegib represented a significant step forward in AML therapeutic armamentarium. Smoothened (SMO) inhibitor in combination with low-dose cytarabine marks a recent milestone. AREAS COVERED: Ivosidenib, the first-in-class, selective, allosteric IDH1R132 inhibitor, showed the capability to induce in vitro differentiation of primary mIDH1 AML blasts. Clinical data highlighted its exceptional safety profile, as a standalone therapy and in combination strategy. Additionally, comprehensive studies consistently demonstrated its effectiveness, both in monotherapy and in association with chemotherapy. EXPERT OPINION: The identified ivosidenib's strengths, including its remarkable safety record and ability to yield positive therapeutic outcomes, position it as an ideal partner for both classic chemotherapy and biological treatments, i.e. hypometilant agents and/or venetoclax. Further studies are warranted to explore strategies for overcoming the occurrence of ivosidenib resistance.

Choosing the Right Therapy at the Right Time for Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Does Sequence Matter.

Despite the enlarging therapeutic armamentarium, IBD is still plagued by a therapeutic ceiling. Precision medicine, with the selection of the "rights," may present a solution, and this review will discuss the critical process of pairing the right patient with right therapy at the right time. Firstly, the review will discuss the shift to and evidence behind early effective therapy. Then, it delves into promising future strategies of patient profiling to identify a patients' biological pathway(s) and prognosis. Finally, the review lays out practical considerations that drive treatment selection, particularly the impact of the therapeutic sequence.

Glasdegib for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.

INTRODUCTION: Over the last few years, substantial progress has been made in the management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The first changes in the management of AML date back to last 2000s with the advent of hypometilant agents, later with Bcl2 inhibitor venetoclax, and Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitors (midostaurin and gilteritinib), and more recently with IDH1/2 inhibitors (ivosidenib and enasidenib) and the hedgehog (HH) pathway inhibitor glasdegib. AREAS COVERED: Glasdegid, formerly PF-04449913 or PF-913, acts as a smoothened (SMO) inhibitor and has been recently approved in combination with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) by FDA and EMA for the treatment of naïve AML patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy.Several studies have explored the efficacy and safety of glasdegib, as a single agent or in combination with other drugs, in both the setting of relapsed/refractory and naïve AML patients, confirming its efficacy in controlling disease and safety profile. EXPERT OPINION: All these trials suggest that glasdegib seems to be an ideal partner for both classic chemotherapy and biological treatments (such as therapy with FLT3 inhibitors). Further studies are needed to better understand which patients are more likely to respond to glasdegib.

Noninfectious Uveitis in Rheumatology: Patterns, Treatment, and Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to determine the pattern and cause of noninfectious uveitis in rheumatology practice. The secondary objective was to identify the pattern of treatment and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Rheumatology, National Hospital and Medical Centre, Lahore, Pakistan. After receiving consent, electronic medical records (EMRs) of all patients with a diagnosis of noninfectious uveitis (NIU) from November 2019 to January 2023 were reviewed, and a total of 52 patients labeled as having noninfectious uveitis were identified. The collected data included age at diagnosis, anatomical location of uveitis, associated systemic disease, used medications, and outcomes. All cases had been diagnosed and assessed mutually by a rheumatologist and an ophthalmologist using the International Uveitis Study Group classification system to classify the pattern of uveitis by location, clinical course, and laterality and rule out the possibility of other ophthalmologic diseases. Disease activity was defined using the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) guidelines. Data was analyzed on SPSS Statistics version 23 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). RESULTS: The mean age of the patients in this study was 36.02 ± 43.31 years, with 31 (59.6%) male patients. Anterior uveitis was the most common type observed among the patients at 55.8%, panuveitis was found in 25%, intermediate uveitis and posterior uveitis were seen in 9.6% each. Based on laterality, unilateral eye involvement was identified in 53.8% of patients. Spondyloarthritis (SpA) and idiopathic uveitis were observed in 34.6% and 28.8%, respectively. In this study, 28 (54.9%) patients were on conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDDs), and 23 (45.1%) were on biological DMARDs. In the biologics group, 82% of patients were in remission in comparison to 60% in the cDMARDs group. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on noninfectious uveitis in the Pakistani population. The study concluded that anterior uveitis is the most common type of uveitis and is more common in males. Spondyloarthropathy is one of the most common underlying systemic diseases. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B27 is associated more with uveitis. Biologics are more effective than cDMARDs in controlling the disease. Collaborative work between different specialties resulted in early diagnosis of underlying systemic disease, better management plans, and disease outcomes. To obtain further details on noninfectious uveitis, a population-based study is needed in Pakistan.

Interactions Between Biologic Therapies and Other Treatment Modalities.

Biologic therapies are becoming increasingly utilized by veterinarians. The literature regarding the interaction of biologic therapies with other therapeutics is still in its infancy. Initial studies have examined the effects of exercise, stress, various pharmaceutical interventions, extracorporeal shockwave, therapeutic laser, and hyperbaric oxygen on biologic therapies. Continued research is imperative as owners and veterinarians increasingly choose a multimodal approach to injury and illness. Further, understanding the effects of concurrently administered treatments and pharmaceuticals as well as the health status of the horse is imperative to providing the optimal therapeutic outcome.

Effectiveness of biologic therapies in children with palmoplantar plaque psoriasis: An analysis of real-life data from the BiPe cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Palmoplantar plaque psoriasis is a frequent clinical subtype of childhood psoriasis. This study evaluated the effectiveness of biologic therapies in children with palmoplantar plaque psoriasis using data from the two Biological treatments for Pediatric Psoriasis (BiPe) cohorts. METHODS: Data for all 170 patients included in the BiPe cohorts were analyzed. Data on the effectiveness (PGA, PASI between baseline and 3 months of treatment) of biologic therapies were then compared between children with palmoplantar plaque psoriasis (n = 20) and those with generalized plaque psoriasis (n = 136). Clinical and demographic data were also analyzed. RESULTS: Children in the palmoplantar group were more likely to be male (p = .04), with an earlier age of psoriasis onset (p < .001), and more frequent nail involvement (p < .001). After 3 months of biologic treatment, mean PGA scores were higher in the palmoplantar group than in the generalized plaque psoriasis group (p = .004). In the palmoplantar group, continuation rates were higher for adalimumab than for etanercept or ustekinumab (p = .01). Primary inefficacy was a more frequent reason for stopping biologic therapies in the palmoplantar group (p = .01), and disease remission was less frequent (p = .05). Combined systemic and biologic therapies were more frequently used in palmoplantar plaque psoriasis (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the treatment-resistant nature of palmoplantar plaque psoriasis and indicated that adalimumab could be the most effective biologic treatment. Larger studies are needed to allow therapeutic algorithms for palmoplantar plaque psoriasis to be proposed in pediatric psoriasis management guidelines.