RESUMEN
Hyperammonemia and liver disease are closely linked. Most of the ammonia in our body is produced by transamination and deamination activities involving amino acid, purine, pyrimidines, and biogenic amines, and from the intestine by bacterial splitting of urea. The only way of excretion from the body is by hepatic conversion of ammonia to urea. Hyperammonemia is associated with widespread toxicities such as cerebral edema, hepatic encephalopathy, immune dysfunction, promoting fibrosis, and carcinogenesis. Over the past two decades, it has been increasingly utilized for prognostication of cirrhosis, acute liver failure as well as acute on chronic liver failure. The laboratory assessment of hyperammonemia has certain limitations, despite which its value in the assessment of various forms of liver disease cannot be negated. It may soon become an important tool to make therapeutic decisions about the use of prophylactic and definitive treatment in various forms of liver disease.
RESUMEN
The natural history of cirrhosis has usually been conceptualized in the context of progression from compensated cirrhosis to subsequent stages of decompensation. While this unidirectional concept is the most common pathophysiological trajectory, there has been an emerging understanding of a subgroup of patients which undergo recompensation. While literature mostly based on transplant waitlist registries have indicated towards such a population who experience disease regression, the overall literature about this entity remains inexplicit. An effort to generate consensus on defining recompensation has been attempted which comes with its own nuances and limitations. We summarize the available literature on this emerging yet controversial concept of recompensation in cirrhosis and delve into future implications and impact on real-life practice.
RESUMEN
Non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs) have a role in the management of portal hypertension. They are currently advocated in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) based on Baveno-VII consensus. Current survey aimed to evaluate the practice and perceptions of prescribing NSBBs in portal hypertension by gastroenterologists and hepatologists in Asia-Pacific region in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Out of 1500 gastroenterologists approached in the region, 328 gastroenterologists responded and completed the survey. 75% of the respondents were found not to be following practice of evaluating CSPH as they prescribed NSBBs in patients of compensated cirrhosis with high-risk varices only. Major concerns raised were non-availability of hepatic venous pressure gradient and reliable non-invasive tests as surrogate of CSPH to adapt PREDESCI methodology. While 56.7% used carvedilol as the preferred NSBB to treat patients with compensated cirrhosis, 43.3% used propranolol. This survey assessed the real-world scenario of prescribing NSBBs among practicing gastroenterologists/hepatologists in patients with compensated cirrhosis.
RESUMEN
Background & Aims: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a major negative impact on health systems and many chronic diseases globally. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the first year of the pandemic on the outcomes of people with NAFLD cirrhosis. Methods: We conducted a before-after study in four University hospitals in Catalonia, Spain. Study subperiods were divided into Pre-pandemic (March/2019-February/2020) vs. Pandemic (March/2020-February/2021). The primary outcome was the rate of first liver-related event (LRE). Overall clinical outcomes (LREs plus cardiovascular plus all-cause mortality) were also assessed. Results: A total of 354 patients were included, all of whom were compensated at the beginning of the study period; 83 individuals (23.5%) had a history of prior hepatic decompensation. Mean age was 67.3 years and 48.3% were female. Median BMI was 31.2 kg/m2 and type 2 diabetes was present in 72.8% of patients. The rates of first LRE in the Pre-pandemic and Pandemic periods were 7.4% and 11.3% (p = 0.12), respectively. Whilst the rate of overall events was significantly higher in the Pandemic period (9.9% vs. 17.8%; p = 0.009), this was strongly associated with COVID-19-related deaths. The rate of worsened metabolic status was significantly higher in the Pandemic period (38.4% vs. 46.1%; p = 0.041), yet this was not associated with the risk of first LRE during the Pandemic period, whereas type 2 diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 3.77; 95% CI 1.15-12.32; p = 0.028), albumin <4 g/L (OR 4.43; 95% CI 1.76-11.17; p = 0.002) and Fibrosis-4 score >2.67 (OR 15.74; 95% CI 2.01-123.22; p = 0.009) were identified as risk factors in the multivariable analysis. Conclusion: Overall, people with NAFLD cirrhosis did not present poorer liver-related outcomes during the first year of the pandemic. Health system preparedness seems key to ensure that people with NAFLD cirrhosis receive appropriate care during health crises. Lay summary: Mobility restrictions and social stress induced by the COVID-19 pandemic have led to increased alcohol drinking and worsened metabolic control (e.g., weight gain, poor control of diabetes) in a large proportion of the population in many countries. We aimed to analyze whether people with cirrhosis due to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, who are particularly vulnerable to such lifestyle modifications, were significantly impacted during the first year of the pandemic. We compared the clinical situation of 354 patients one year before the pandemic and one year after. We found that although metabolic control was indeed worse after the first year of the pandemic and patients presented worse clinical outcomes, the latter was mostly due to non-liver causes, namely COVID-19 itself. Moreover, the care provided to these patients did not worsen during the first year of the pandemic.
RESUMEN
Background and aims: Noninvasive tools (NITs) reliably categorise patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) into high-risk and low-risk group for harbouring varices needing treatment. Here, we assess the ability of these NITs to predict the need for nonselective beta-blockers at baseline based on risk of variceal bleeding (VB) on follow-up. Methods: This was a retrospective multicentre analysis of patients with cACLD categorised at baseline into different risk groups by NITs (Baveno-VI, expanded Baveno-VI, platelet-albumin, platelet-model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and anticipate study platelet criteria) and by endoscopy (high risk vs low risk/no varices). VB event rates on follow-up were estimated in different risk strata. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to estimate the benefit of administering nonselective beta-blockers (NSBB) using NITs over endoscopic classification at different threshold probabilities of VB event rates and estimating the number needed to treat (NNT) to identify one additional bleeder over endoscopy. Results: A total of 1284 patients (mean age: 44.7 ± 13.5 years, 72.4% males) of hepatitis B (29.2%), nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (24.9%), hepatitis C (20.1%), and alcohol (17.5%)-related cACLD were included with 323 (25.2%) having high-risk varices. Ninety-eight (7.6%) patients developed VB over a median follow-up of 20 (9-35) months. The 1-year and 3-year rate of VB with all NITs was 5.7-7.4% and 13.2-16.4% among high-risk and 0-2.3% and 0-5% among low-risk subgroups, respectively (P < 0.001) in both viral and nonviral aetiologies. Among patients classified as low risk on Baveno-VI criteria, none developed VB on follow-up. At thresholds of <3% event rate of VB, Baveno-VI (NNT-176), platelet-albumin (NNT-576) and anticipate platelet (NNT-233) criteria were superior, whereas endoscopic stratification was superior above this event rate on DCA. Conclusions: The use of both elastography and blood-based NITs at baseline can accurately identify the need for NSBB for VB prophylaxis in patients of cACLD on follow-up.
