Variables Leading to Usage of Alteplase Versus Heparin Lock in Patients With Tunneled Catheters in Hemodialysis Care Project Centers, Saudi Arabia.

INTRODUCTION: A hemodialysis tunneled catheter is one option for vascular access used with hemodialysis patients; however, catheter complications such as thrombosis are still inevitable. To prevent thrombosis formation, a catheter-locking solution is instilled between dialysis sessions. Heparin is used as a default locking solution in our Hemodialysis Care Project centers, while a recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) such as alteplase is used to treat suspected catheter thrombosis. This study aimed to identify the clinical factors, catheter brands, and hemodialysis variables that influence the choice of use for alteplase versus heparin, for those patients with tunneled catheters, and reduce overprescribing of high-alert medication alteplase. METHODS: A retrospective medical chart review study was conducted involving 230 patients with tunneled catheters; the first group of 133 patients used alteplase regularly three times a week, while the second group of 97 patients completed at least one year using the same catheter access with heparin lock only. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression and logistic regression analysis showed a significant association (p < 0.05) between different variables. Results suggest that overweight and hyperlipidemia patients are more likely to use alteplase. Patients using brand-name catheters such as Hemostar/Vas-cath (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ) are less likely to use heparin than those using Medcomp catheters (Medcomp, Yuma, AZ). In addition, patients having a history of angioplasty would be less likely to have heparin than no angioplasty. Moreover, if the patient's fluid removal were equal to or less than 2 kg, they would be more likely to use heparin and vice versa. CONCLUSION: The study postulates that identified variables affect whether alteplase or heparin is used in hemodialysis tunneled catheters, and may be useful to increase awareness, improve practices, or judiciously control the use of alteplase within Saudi Arabia and globally.

Risk factors of hemodialysis catheter dysfunction in patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Continuous renal replacement therapy is a relatively common modality applied to critically ill patients with renal impairment. To maintain stable continuous renal replacement therapy, sufficient blood flow through the circuit is crucial, but catheter dysfunction reduces the blood flow by inadequate pressures within the circuit. Therefore, exploring and modifying the possible risk factors related to catheter dysfunction can help to provide continuous renal replacement therapy with minimal interruption. METHODS: Adult patients who received continuous renal replacement therapy at Seoul National University Hospital between January 2019 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who received continuous renal replacement therapy via a temporary hemodialysis catheter, inserted at the bedside under ultrasound guidance within 12 h of continuous renal replacement therapy initiation were included. RESULTS: A total of 507 continuous renal replacement therapy sessions in 457 patients were analyzed. Dialysis catheter dysfunction occurred in 119 sessions (23.5%). Multivariate analysis showed that less prolonged prothrombin time (adjusted OR 0.49, 95% CI, 0.30-0.82, p = 0.007) and activated partial thromboplastin time (adjusted OR 1.01, 95% CI, 1.00-1.01, p = 0.049) were associated with increased risk of catheter dysfunction. Risk factors of re-catheterization included vascular access to the left jugular and femoral vein. CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy, less prolonged prothrombin time was associated with earlier catheter dysfunction. Use of left internal jugular veins and femoral vein were associated with increased risk of re-catheterization compared to the right internal jugular vein.

Clinical outcomes for femoral tunneled-cuffed hemodialysis catheters with different tip positions: A single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Tunneled-cuffed catheter (TCC) reaching the mid-atrium has been demonstrated to be associated with improved catheter survival. However, whether similar conclusions can be made for femoral TCC reaching the inferior vena cava (IVC) remains unknown. METHODS: Data from 47 patients with end-stage renal disease receiving right femoral TCC were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The primary patency, catheter dysfunction, and TCC-associated infection rate were compared between patients with TCC tip at the IVC and those with TCC tip at non-IVC. RESULTS: TCC tips were located at the IVC in 26 patients and non-IVC in 21 patients. The technical success rates for both groups were 100%. The primary patency of the former group were significantly higher than those of the latter group at 3 months (92.3% vs 61.9%, p = 0.011), 6 months (80.8% vs 52.4%, p = 0.017), and 12 months (50.0% vs 28.5%, p = 0.024) follow-up, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis demonstrated significantly different catheter dysfunction-free survival between the two groups (log-rank p = 0.017). The overall TCC-associated infection rate was similar between the two groups (7.7% vs 9.5%, p = 0.82). CONCLUSION: Femoral TCC with tips at IVC was associated with higher primary patency, lower catheter dysfunction but similar TCC-associated infection rate as compared with those at non-IVC.

Type II Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: An Underrecognized Cause of Dialysis Catheter Dysfunction - A Case Report.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is categorized into type 1 and type 2. It causes a decrease in platelet count during or shortly after exposure to heparin. Type 1 is mild and has a non-immune mechanism. Type 2 is a hypercoagulable state resulting from anti-heparin platelet factor 4 (PF4) IgG antibodies. These antibodies cause the activation of endothelium and thrombin generation. Type 2 HIT is complicated by life-threatening thromboembolic events such as deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and myocardial infarction. HIT remains an under-recognized cause of dialysis catheter dysfunction and thrombosis. We present a case of a 66-year-old male with recurrent dialysis catheter thrombosis secondary to Type 2 HIT. Avoiding heparin-based dialysis or switching to non-heparin-based anticoagulation or peritoneal dialysis are the possible management strategies for such patients.

Bladder perforation injury after percutaneous peritoneal dialysis catheterization: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Insertion of a catheter into the bladder is a rare complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD), and is mainly related to surgical injury. This paper reports a case of bladder perforation that was caused by percutaneous PD catheterization. CASE SUMMARY: A 64-year-old man underwent percutaneous PD catheterization for end-stage renal disease. On the second day after the operation, urgent urination and gross hematuria occurred. Urinalysis showed the presence of red and white blood cells. Empirical anti-infective treatment was given. On the third day after the operation, urgent urination occurred during PD perfusion. Ultrasound showed that the PD catheter was located in the bladder, and subsequent computed tomography (CT) showed that the PD catheter moved through the anterior wall into the bladder. The PD catheter was withdrawn from the bladder and catheterization was retained. Repeat CT on the fourth day after the operation showed that the PD catheter was removed from the bladder, but there was poor catheter function. The PD catheter was removed and the patient was changed to hemodialysis. CT cystography showed that the bladder healed well and the patient was discharged 14 d after the operation. CONCLUSION: Bladder perforation injury should be considered and treated timeously in case of bladder irritation during and after percutaneous PD catheterization. The use of Doppler ultrasound and other related technologies may reduce the incidence of such complications.

Investigation of risk factors for tunneled hemodialysis catheters dysfunction: competing risk analysis of a tertiary center data.

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis tunneled catheters are prone to failure due to infection or thrombosis. Prediction of catheter dysfunction chance and finding the predisposing risk factors might help clinicians to prolong proper catheter function. The multidimensional mechanism of failures following infection or thrombosis needs a multivariable and comprehensive analytic approach. METHODS: A longitudinal cross-sectional study was implemented on 1048 patients admitted for the first hemodialysis tunneled catheterization attempt between 2013 and 2019 in Shahid Hasheminejdad hospital, Tehran, Iran. Patients' information was extracted from digital and also paper records. Based on their criteria, single and multiple variable analyses were done separately in patients with catheter dysfunction due to thrombosis and infection. T-test and Chi-square test were performed in quantitative and categorical variables, respectively. Competing risk regression was performed under the assumption of proportionality for infection and thrombosis, and the sub-distributional hazard ratios (SHR) were calculated. All statistical inferences were made with a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-six patients were enrolled in the analysis based on study criteria. Samples' mean (SD) age was 54(15.54), and 322 (69.1%) patients were female. Three hundred sixty-five catheter dysfunction cases were observed due to thrombosis 123(26.4%) and infection 242(52%). The Median (range) time to catheter dysfunction event was 243(36-1131) days. Single variable analysis showed a statistically significant higher proportion of thrombosis in females (OR = 2.66, 95% CI: 1.77-4.00) and younger patients, respectively. Multivariate competing risk regression showed a statistically significant higher risk of thrombosis in females (Sub-distributional hazard (SHR) = 1.81), hypertensive (SHR = 1.82), and more obese patients (BMI SHR = 1.037). A higher risk of infection was calculated in younger (Age SHR = 0.98) and diabetic (SHR = 1.63) patients using the same method. CONCLUSION: Female and hypertensive patients are considerably at higher risk of catheter thrombosis, whereas diabetes is the most critical risk factor for infectious catheter dysfunction. Competing risk regression analysis showed a comprehensive result in the assessment of risk factors of catheter dysfunction.

Internal Jugular Central Venous Catheter Tip Migration: Patient and Procedural Factors.

Background: The ideal central venous catheter (CVC) tip position placement is controversial, and CVCs do not remain in a fixed position after placement. This study evaluates both patient and procedural factors which may influence CVC tip migration and subsequent catheter dysfunction. Materials and Methods: This study evaluates CVC placements at a single institution. Patient age, gender, body mass index (BMI), catheter laterality, CVC type and indication for central venous access were recorded. Catheter tip location relative to the carina was measured at time of placement and removal utilizing supine fluoroscopic imaging. Patients' electronic medical records were reviewed for evidence of catheter dysfunction. Statistical analysis was performed utilizing odds ratios and two tailed Student's t-test. Results: 177 patients were included (101 female; mean age 55; mean BMI 29.2). Catheter types included 122 ports, 50 tunneled large bore central venous catheters (≥9 French), and 5 tunneled small bore central venous catheters (<9 French). 127 were right sided catheters, and 50 were left sided. Left sided CVCs had a mean cranial tip migration of 3.2 cm (standard deviation ±2.9 cm) compared to 0.8 cm (standard deviation ±1.9 cm) for right sided catheters (p = 0.000008). Catheters that migrated cranially by >2 cm had more than 7× greater risk of dysfunction compared to catheters that migrated ≤2 cm (odds ratio of 7.2; p = 0.0001). Left sided CVCs were significantly more likely to have >2 cm of cranial migration (odds ratio 6.9, 95% CI 3.4−14.2, p < 0.0001) and had a higher rate of dysfunction, likely due to this cranial migration (32% vs. 4.7%; p = 0.00001). Gender and BMI were not found to be associated with catheter dysfunction or an increased odds ratio of >2 cm cranial migration. Conclusions: Left-sided CVCs migrate an average of 2.4 cm cranially more than right-sided catheters. Additionally, when migration occurs, left-sided catheters are more likely to be dysfunctional. These suggest that lower initial placement may be beneficial in left-sided catheters.

Catheter Port Reversal in Citrate Continuous Veno-Venous Hemofiltration.

INTRODUCTION: Knowledge of effects of catheter port reversal (CathPR), when blood is withdrawn from the venous port and returned via the arterial port, often used in dysfunctional catheters in renal replacement therapy, is limited in the setting of citrate continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH). METHODS: In this open trial, post-filter ionized calcium (PfiCa), post-filter citrate concentration (PfCC), catheter recirculation, and solute clearance were measured before, during, and after 6 hours of CathPR, in well-functioning catheters. All other settings, including citrate settings, were left constant during the study. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were included. Mean PfiCa before CathPR of 0.36 mmol/L (SD 0.06) decreased to 0.31 (0.04) after 2 hours (P = 0.002), 0.31 (0.04) (P = 0.002) at 4 hours, and 0.31 (0.04) at 6 hours (P = 0.001). Return to normal increased mean PfiCa to 0.34 (0.06) (P = 0.006). Mean PfCC rose from 592 mg/L (SD 164) before CathPR to 649 mg/L (190) after 2 hours (P = 0.045), to 696 mg/L (192) after 4 hours (P < 0.001), and to 657 mg/L (214) after 6 hours (P = 0.018). Return to normal decreased mean PfCC to 598 mg/L (184) (P = 0.024). Mean recirculation increased during CathPR (from 4.3% [0-8.7] before to 13.8% [9.7-22.2], P < 0.001). Urea, potassium, and creatinine clearances dropped significantly, but calcium clearance was unaffected. CONCLUSION: CathPR caused a significant decrease in PfiCA and increase in PfCC. Calcium handling differs from other solutes because of increases caused in citrate concentration and subsequent effects on calcium chelation. In citrate CVVH, CathPR in dysfunctional catheters should be limited in time, with intensive follow-up. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT024600416. Registered 9 November 2015.

A 2% taurolidine catheter lock solution prevents catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) and catheter dysfunction in hemodialysis patients.

HIGHLIGHTS: 2% taurolidine catheter lock solution without additives is safe and efficient. CRBSI and dysfunction rates compare favorably against other studies in hemodialysis. BACKGROUND: In hemodialysis patients, catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) and catheter dysfunction are common and cause significant morbidity, mortality, and costs. Catheter lock solutions reduce CRBSI and catheter dysfunction rates, but solutions containing heparin, citrate, or antibiotics are associated with adverse effects. Due to its antimicrobial and antithrombotic properties and benign safety profile, taurolidine is suitable for use in catheter lock solutions. In this study the effectiveness and safety of a catheter lock solution containing 2% taurolidine without citrate or heparin (TauroSept®, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland) in hemodialysis patients were investigated for the first time. METHODS: Data from 21 patients receiving chronic hemodialysis via tunneled central venous catheters with 2% taurolidine solution as a catheter lock were analyzed in a single-center retrospective study and compared with the existing literature in a review. The primary endpoint was CRBSI rate. Secondary endpoints included catheter dysfunction, treatment, and costs; catheter technical problems, resolution, and costs; and adverse events. Data were compared to outcomes with standard lock solutions in the literature. RESULTS: No CRBSIs occurred during the observation period of 5,639 catheter days. The catheter dysfunction rate was 0.71 per 1,000 catheter days, and the catheter dysfunction treatment costs were CHF (Swiss Franc) 543 per patient. No technical problems or adverse events related to the use of 2% taurolidine-containing catheter lock solution were observed. These results compare favorably with other catheter lock solutions. CONCLUSIONS: A solution containing 2% taurolidine seems suitable as a hemodialysis catheter lock. In a Swiss cohort, it prevented CRBSI, limited catheter dysfunction, and was cost-efficient.

Locked Away-Prophylaxis and Management of Catheter Related Thrombosis in Hemodialysis.

Reliable vascular access is necessary for effective hemodialysis. Guidelines recommend chronic hemodialysis via an arteriovenous fistula (AVF), however, in a significant number of patients, permanent central venous catheters (CVCs) are used. The use of a tunneled catheter is acceptable if the estimated dialysis time is less than a year or it is not possible to create an AVF. The main complications associated with CVC include thrombosis and catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs), which may result in loss of vascular access. The common practice is to use locking solutions to maintain catheter patency and minimize the risk of CRBSI. This paperwork summarizes information on currently available locking solutions for dialysis catheters along with their effectiveness in preventing thrombotic and infectious complications and describes methods of dealing with catheter dysfunction. The PubMed database was systematically searched for articles about locking solutions used in permanent CVCs in hemodialysis patients. Additional studies were identified by searching bibliographies and international guidelines. Articles on end-stage kidney disease patients dialyzed through a permanent CVC were included. Information from each primary study was extracted using pre-determined criteria including thrombotic and infectious complications of CVC use, focusing on permanent CVC if sufficient data were available. Of the currently available substances, it seems that citrate at a concentration of 4% has the best cost-effectiveness and safety profile, which is reflected in the international guidelines. Recent studies suggest the advantage of 2+1 protocols, i.e., taurolidine-based solutions with addition of urokinase once a week, although it needs to be confirmed by further research. Regardless of the type of locking solution, if prophylaxis with a thrombolytic agent is chosen, it should be started from the very beginning to reduce the risk of thrombotic complications. In case of CVC dysfunction, irrespective of the thrombolysis attempt, catheter replacement should be planned as soon as possible.

The impact of anatomical variables on haemodialysis tunnelled catheter replacement without fluoroscopy.

AIM: Tunnelled haemodialysis (HD) catheters can be used instantly, but there are several anatomical variables that could impact it survival. This study aimed to examine the impact of different novel anatomic variables, with catheter replacement. METHODS: In a single-centre a prospective cohort in chronic kidney disease G5 patients were conducted. The primary outcome was to determine the factors associated with catheter replacement during the first 6-month of follow-up. All procedures were performed without fluoroscopy. Three anatomic regions for catheter tip position were established: considered as superior vena cava (SVC), cavo-atrial junction (CAJ) and mid-to deep atrium (MDA). Many other anatomical variables were measured. Catheter-related bloodstream infection was also included. RESULTS: Between January 2019 and January 2020 a total of 75 patients with tunnelled catheter insertion were analysed. Catheter replacement at 6-month occur in 10 (13.3%) patients. By multivariate analysis, the incorrect catheter tip position (SVC) (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.07-1.42, p <.004), the presence of extrasystoles during the procedure (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-0.98, p = .03), incorrect catheter tug (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.10-1.55, p = .003), incorrect catheter top position (kinking; OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.04-1.88, p = .02) and catheter-related bloodstream infection (OR 2.60, 95% CI 2.09-3.25, p <.001) were the only variables associated with catheter replacement at 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: The risk of catheter replacement at 6-month follow-up could be attenuated by avoiding incorrect catheter tug and top position, and by placing the vascular catheter tip in the CAJ and MDA.

Partial breakage of a tunneled dialysis catheter: An uncommon finding.

Infections and dysfunction are the most common complications related to catheter use. Here we describe a case of catheter rupture on the course of subcutaneous channel. Catheter fractures are relatively rare, but potentially hazardous complications. In case of partial breakage, a catheter exchange should be a simple solution.

Factors Associated With Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Complications in ESRD.

INTRODUCTION: Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (PD) in patients with newly diagnosed end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a well-tolerated alternative to hemodialysis (HD). The primary aim of this study was to identify the demographic and clinical characteristics of ESRD patients, as well as the presurgical, surgical, and postsurgical factors associated with urgent-start PD complications. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional observational study was performed on 102 patients with ESRD who merited urgent-start PD from January 2015 to June 2019. The primary clinical outcome measures were catheter leakage, dysfunction, and peritonitis, whereas the secondary outcomes were catheter removal, repositioning, and death. Statistical inferences were made with the χ2 or Fisher's exact test and independent samples t tests. RESULTS: One hundred two subjects (65 men, 63.7%) 56.2 ± 15.1 years old were included in this study; 64 of the subjects had diabetes and hypertension (62.7%). Catheter leakage occurred in 8 patients (7.8%), catheter dysfunction in 27 patients (26.5%), and peritonitis in 14 patients (13.7%); meanwhile, catheter removal occurred in 6 patients (5.9%), catheter repositioning in 21 patients (20.6%), and death in 3 patients (2.9%). Peritonitis was associated with younger age (i.e., 47.0 ± 16.8 vs. 57.6 ± 14.4 years; P = 0.014; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.2-19.1; odds ratio [OR] 0.96; P = 0.018; 95% CI: 0.92-099), higher creatinine levels upon admission (i.e., 20.2 ± 9.8 vs. 14.1 ± 8.3; P = 0.014; 95% CI: -10.9 to -1.2), and heart failure (OR 4.79; P = 0.043; 95% CI: 1.05-21.88). Patients with abdominal hernia were 7.5 times more likely to have their catheter leak (OR 7.5; P = 0.036; 95% CI: 1.14-49.54). Catheter removal was associated with obesity (i.e., body mass index [BMI] of 31.6 ± 4.1 vs. 25.9 ± 4.9; P = 0.007; 95% CI: -9.8 to -1.6; OR 1.26; P = 0.013; 95% CI: 1.05-1.51) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease glomerular filtration rate (MDRD-GFR) (i.e., 2.5 ± 0.6 vs. 3.7 ± 2.3; P = 0.003; 95% CI: 0.5-1.9). CONCLUSION: Peritonitis was associated with younger age, higher creatinine levels upon admission, and heart failure; meanwhile, catheter removal was linked to obesity and lower glomerular filtration rate. Compared with previous reports, our study included patients in which PD was initiated shortly after catheter insertion, making the intervention a true urgent-start PD. This study contributes to the existing urgent-start PD literature by providing evidence that urgent-start PD with catheter opening within 72 hours has limited complications, making it a relatively safe option.

Straight Versus Coiled Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Despite a recent meta-analysis favoring straight catheters, the clinical benefits of straight versus coiled peritoneal dialysis catheters remain uncertain. We conducted a randomized controlled study to compare the complication rates associated with these 2 types of double-cuffed peritoneal dialysis catheters. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 308 adult continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to receive either straight or coiled catheters. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was the incidence of catheter dysfunction requiring surgical intervention. Secondary outcomes included time to catheter dysfunction requiring intervention, catheter migration with dysfunction, infusion pain measured using a visual analogue scale, peritonitis, technique failure, and peritoneal catheter survival. RESULTS: 153 patients were randomly assigned to straight catheters; and 155, to coiled catheters. Among randomly assigned patients who underwent peritoneal dialysis, during a mean follow-up of 21 months, the primary outcome of catheter dysfunction or drainage failure occurred in 9 (5.8%) patients who received a coiled catheter and 1 (0.7%) patient who received a straight catheter. Straight catheters had 5.1% lower risk for catheter dysfunction (95% CI, 1.2%-9.1%; P=0.02). The HR of the primary outcome for coiled versus straight catheters was 8.69 (95% CI, 1.10-68.6; P=0.04). Patients who received a coiled catheter had similar risk for peritonitis but reported higher infusion pain scores than those who received straight catheters. LIMITATIONS: Generalizability to other peritoneal dialysis centers with lower volumes and other races and nationalities. CONCLUSIONS: Use of straight Tenckhoff catheters compared with coiled catheters reduced the rate of catheter dysfunction requiring surgical intervention. FUNDING: Funded by the Chinese University of Hong Kong. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study number NCT02479295.

Peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion using a very-low-site approach: a 5-year experience.

PURPOSE: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter tip migration accounts for the majority of cases of PD catheter malfunction. In this case series, we described our experiences of using a modified PD catheter implantation approach through a site that is lower than the site that is conventionally used, to reduce catheter malfunction. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 76 patients who received PD catheter implantation at the Affiliated Wujin Hospital of Jiangsu University, among whom 39 received the traditional approach of low-site insertion and 37 received a modified approach of very-low-site insertion. All participants were followed up for at least 2 years after PD catheter implantation, and the development of catheter dysfunction or death during this period was monitored. RESULTS: We found that the survival rate of the initially inserted catheter was 75.68% among the very-low-site group. This survival rate was significantly better than that observed among the low-site group (48.72%; p = 0.029). Kaplan-Meier curves of the initial catheter survival also showed that the catheter survival was significantly higher in the patients in the very-low-site group than those in the low-site group (log rank p = 0.012). Complications, such as catheter tip migration, were not observed in the very-low-site group, while tip migration occurred in 15.38% of the patients in the low-site group (very-low-site group vs low-site group: p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: A safe and simple PD catheter implantation can be performed either through the low-site approach or the very-low-site approach.

Which Type of Temporary Hemodialysis Catheter Should Be Used for the Right Internal Jugular Vein? Prospective Observational Study of Straight vs. Precurved Catheters.

Weak evidence is present for choosing amongst different temporary hemodialysis catheter (THC) designs with regards to the risk of venous thrombosis, therefore two THC designs for the right internal jugular vein (RIJV) were compared. Patients aged ≥18 years who needed THC insertion into the RIJV for acute hemodialysis due to either acute or chronic renal failure were included. The type of THC (precurved/straight) was dependent on the date of hospital admission. Clinical and ultrasonographic surveillance was conducted prospectively. Thrombosis of the RIJV was the primary objective. Precurved and straight catheters were inserted into 32 and 23 patients (mean age 63 ± 15 years, females 28), respectively. The baseline characteristics and catheter dwell-times were similar in both groups. Partial and total thrombosis of the RIJV during catheter dwell-time developed at a higher rate in the straight group (52% vs. 9.3%, P = 0.000; 47.8% vs. 9.3%, P = 0.001, respectively). At least 2 weeks after catheter removal, total thrombosis was found in 43.4% vs. 9.6% (P = 0.004) of patients with straight and precurved THCs, respectively. The hazard ratios for total thrombosis was 0.161 (P = 0.006) during catheter dwell-time and 0.190 (P = 0.012) after catheter removal. Catheter dysfunction did not occur and only one catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBI) was seen. Thrombosis rates of the RIJV were higher with straight vs. precurved THCs, both during catheter dwell-time and after catheter removal. Catheter dysfunction was not noted in any group and the rate of CRBI was extremely low.

Reducing the occurrence rate of catheter dysfunction in peritoneal dialysis: a single-center experience about CQI.

To reduce the occurrence rate of peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter dysfunction caused by catheter displacement or plugging, this study screened all patients with peritoneal dialysis catheterization from 2002 to 2015 from the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. There were 256 patients before continuous quality improvement (CQI) (from 2002 to 2007) and 813 patients after CQI (from 2008 to 2015). The occurrence rate of catheter dysfunction was 5.9% in the preCQI group: seven cases were associated with peritonitis, six cases were involved in omentum wrapping, one case was blocked by oviduct, and one case was blocked by blood clot. Through PDCA (plan-do-check-act) four-step of CQI, the following measures were adopted: (1) Preoperative: treat complications, enema and urine catheterization (2) Intraoperative: strengthen analgesia, Lower the insert position of catheter to 7.5 ∼ 8.5 cm above the pubic symphysis, extending the straight distance of catheter in rectus abdominis and decrease the times of peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation. (3) Postoperative: strengthen the training of nurses, patients and their families. (4) strengthen anticoagulation therapy during peritonitis treatment. (5) use laparoscopic technology for refractory patients, and so on. The occurrence of catheter dysfunction was 1.5% in the postCQI group (p < 0.05): two cases were associated with peritonitis, ten cases were involved in omentum wrapping. The measures we adopted in CQI reduce the occurrence rate of catheter displacement or plugging in peritoneal dialysis.

[Comparison of citrate 4% and heparin as tunneled-catheters-locking solution in chronic hemodialysis]. / Comparaison des verrous de cathéters tunnellisés par citrate 4 % et héparine en hémodialyse chronique.

INTRODUCTION: Citrate 4% is an alternative to heparin as catheter-locking solution in chronic hemodialysis patients. We compared catheter dysfunction episodes, dialysis adequacy, plasminogen-tissular activators use and costs according to catheter-locking solution in our centre. METHODS: Prospective, monocentric, cohort study (NephroCare Tassin-Charcot) on 49 prevalent patients in chronic hemodialysis. Two main groups were formed according to the prescription of catheter-locking solution at the beginning of the study (03/02/2016) and followed until 05/10/2016: heparin (n=26) and citrate (n=22). RESULTS: The number of diabetic patients was higher in the citrate group (12/22) than in the heparin one (5/26; P=0.025). The 2 groups were comparable for the other studied variables. We didn't observe any difference in terms of catheter-dysfunction (4.23 versus 4.14% in heparin and citrate groups, respectively; P=1.0) and dialysis adequacy. The prescription of citrate was associated with lower TPA uses (1/604 versus 14/946; P=0.022) and lower costs (1.42 € for one session versus 2.94 €). CONCLUSION: Administration of citrate 4% as a catheter-locking solution is not inferior to heparin in terms of catheter-dysfunction episodes, is associated with similar dialysis adequacy results, lower plasminogen-tissular activators uses and reduced costs in chronic prevalent hemodialysed patients.