The Experience and the Characteristics of Patients With Tele-ICU Implementation in a Rural Community Hospital.

Background Tele-ICUs are increasingly being used in the US. In Japan, young physicians mainly operate rural community hospitals to manage severely ill patients. However, the introduction of the tele-ICU system in Japan is still uncommon. We introduced a tele-ICU system to a community hospital. The objective of this study is to determine if the newly introduced tele-ICU system is being effectively utilized. Methods This is a single-center, retrospective observational study. We introduced the tele-ICU system to the NachiKatsuura Town Onsen Hospital, Japan, in 2019. Thereafter, we retrospectively explored the characteristics of the consulted cases, the time of consultation, the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, and the number of consultations by month from 1st July 2019 to 31st March 2020. The main outcome was the monthly number of consultations, and other measures included the clinical characteristics of the consulted cases. Results A total of 81 cases were referred to the tele-ICU system within nine months. Sixty-two cases, excluding those with missing data, were included in the analysis. The number of consultations was almost constant during the study period and was most frequent during the day. The recommendations from tele-ICU physicians were mostly "advice on the treatment plan." The mean SOFA score was 2.56. Conclusions We introduced a Japanese-type tele-ICU system for Japanese rural community hospitals. Many cases from rural community hospitals that were referred to the tele-ICU systems were moderately severe and did not require urgent transportation. These cases are not indicated for emergency transportation and should be treated in rural community hospitals.

Incidence of Non-thrombotic Diagnoses Following Venous Duplex Ultrasound at a Community Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND:  When used as a diagnostic aid for diagnosing deep vein thrombosis (DVT), venous duplex ultrasound (US) may reveal non-thrombotic findings in those with acute extremity pain. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and predictors of non-thrombotic findings on venous duplex US at a community emergency department. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all adult patients who presented to a community emergency department who underwent either an upper or lower extremity venous duplex US for the evaluation of DVT from June 1, 2019, to September 15, 2020. All US studies were completed by certified sonographers and interpreted by board-certified radiologists. Two trained research assistants manually abstracted patient demographics and US findings. Data were analyzed using the chi-square statistic for categorical variables and the student's independent t-test for continuous variables. Multivariate binomial regression was used to identify independent predictors of non-thrombotic results on venous duplex US. RESULTS: A total of 1,448 venous duplex US were obtained during the study period with 126 DVTs being diagnosed. A total of 1071 US had no acute abnormality and 252 had non-thrombotic findings. All non-thrombotic findings were found in the lower extremity. Of those with non-thrombotic findings, the most common diagnoses included edema (34.9%, 88/252), Baker's cyst (22.6%, 57/252), and an unspecified fluid collection (16.3%, 41/252). Patients with non-thrombotic findings were more likely to have a history of atrial fibrillation (p=0.001) or hypertension (p=0.001), be older than the age of 70 (p=0.042), or have a history of using illicit drugs (p=0.003). Females were less likely to have non-thrombotic findings. CONCLUSION: In this single-site study, non-thrombotic findings were present in 23.5% of all venous duplex US completed at a community emergency department. These findings are more common in the elderly, those with cardiovascular disorders, and those who have used illicit drugs.

The Use of Experts to Evaluate a Child Abuse Guideline in Community Emergency Departments.

OBJECTIVE: Guidelines and pathways exist to help frontline providers evaluate injured children for suspected child abuse. Little, however, is known about whether the decision-making resulting from these interventions is correct. Therefore, in the absence of an available gold-standard test, we used experts' judgments to examine the appropriateness of these clinical decisions. We evaluated community emergency department (ED) providers' adherence to a guideline recommending a child protection team (CPT) consultation for infants with injuries associated with abuse. We then compared providers' decision-making to experts' recommendations before and after guideline implementation. METHODS: Two experts conducted a blinded, retrospective review of injured infants from 3 community EDs (N = 175). Experts rated the likelihood that an injury was abusive, indeterminate, or accidental, and made recommendations that were compared with skeletal survey (SS) testing and child protective services (CPS) reporting by providers before and after guideline implementation. RESULTS: Postguideline implementation, there was a significant increase in CPT consultations in indeterminate cases (14.3% vs 72.2%, P < .001) and in SS testing when experts recommended SS (20.6% vs 56.8%, P = .002). In contrast, a higher percentage of cases for whom the experts did not recommend reporting were reported to CPS (1.8% vs 14.6%, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Providers consulted the CPT most often for indeterminate cases. SS testing was in line with expert recommendations, but CPS reporting diverged from expert recommendations. Interventions linking community ED providers with a CPT may improve the evaluation of infants with injuries concerning for abuse.