Histopathological correlation of brain tumor recurrence vs. radiation effect post-radiosurgery as detected by MRI contrast clearance analysis: a validation study.

PURPOSE: The differentiation between adverse radiation effects (ARE) and tumor recurrence or progression (TRP) is a major decision-making point in the follow-up of patients with brain tumors. The advent of immunotherapy, targeted therapy and radiosurgery has made this distinction difficult to achieve in several clinical situations. Contrast clearance analysis (CCA) is a useful technique that can inform clinical decisions but has so far only been histologically validated in the context of high-grade gliomas. METHODS: This is a series of 7 patients, treated between 2018 and 2023, for various brain pathologies including brain metastasis, atypical meningioma, and high-grade glioma. MRI with contrast clearance analysis was used to inform clinical decisions and patients underwent surgical resection as indicated. The histopathology findings were compared with the CCA findings in all cases. RESULTS: All seven patients had been treated with gamma knife radiosurgery and were followed up with periodic MR imaging. All patients underwent CCA when the necessity to distinguish tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis arose, and subsequently underwent surgery as indicated. Concordance of CCA findings with histological findings was found in all cases (100%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on prior studies on GBM and the surgical findings in our series, delayed contrast extravasation MRI findings correlate well with histopathology across a wide spectrum of brain tumor pathologies. CCA can provide a quick diagnosis and have a direct impact on patients' treatment and outcomes.

Contrast Clearance Analysis (CCA) to Assess Viable Tumour following Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) to Brain Metastasis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Brain metastases are common in lung cancer and increasingly treated using targeted radiotherapy techniques such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Using MRI, post-SRS changes may be difficult to distinguish from progressive brain metastasis. Contrast clearance analysis (CCA) uses T1-weighted MRI images to assess the clearance of gadolinium and can be thus used to assess vascularity and active tumours. DESIGN AND METHODS: We retrospectively assessed CCAs in 62 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing 104 CCA scans in a single centre. RESULTS: The initial CCA suggested the aetiology of equivocal changes on standard MRI in 80.6% of patients. In all patients whose initial CCA showed post-SRS changes and who underwent serial CCAs, the initial diagnosis was upheld with the serial imaging. In only two cases of a presumed progressive tumour on the initial CCA, subsequent treatment for radionecrosis was instigated; a retrospective review and re-evaluation of the CCAs show that progression was reported where a thin rim of rapid contrast clearance was seen, and this finding has been subsequently recognised as a feature of post-treatment change on CCAs. The lack of concordance with CCA findings in those who underwent surgical resection was also found to be due to the over-reporting of the thin blue rim as disease in the early cases of CCA use and, in three cases, potentially related to timelines longer than 7 days prior to surgery, both factors being unknown during the early implementation phase of CCA at our centre but subsequently learned. CONCLUSIONS: Our single-centre experience shows CCA to be feasible and useful in patients with NSCLC in cases of diagnostic uncertainty in MRI. It has helped guide treatment in the majority of patients, with subsequent outcomes following the implementation of the treatment based on the results, suggesting correct classification. Recommendations from our experience of the implementation include the careful consideration of the thin rim of the rapid contrast clearance and the timing of the CCA prior to surgery for suspected brain metastasis progression.