Severity of illness and risk of mortality from all patient refined-diagnosis related groups: Two scales of different concepts or two sides of the same coin?

All patient refined-diagnosis related groups (APR-DRGs) includes severity of illness (SOI) and risk of mortality (ROM) subclasses. For predictions, both subscales are used together or interchangeably. We aimed to compare SOI and ROM by evaluating the reliability and agreement between both. We performed a retrospective observational study using mainland Portuguese public hospitalisations of adult patients from 2011 to 2016. Reliability (quadratic weighted kappa) and agreement (proportion of agreement) between SOI and ROM were analysed overall and by APR-DRG. While overall reliability and agreement between SOI and ROM were high (weighted kappa: 0.717, 95% CI 0.717-0.718; proportion of agreement: 69.0%, 95% CI 69.0-69.0) there was high heterogeneity across APR-DRGs, ranging from 0.016 to 0.846 on reliability and from 23.1% to 94.8% on agreement. Most of APR-DRGs (263 out of 284) showed a higher proportion of episodes with ROM level above the SOI level than the opposite. In conclusion, SOI and Risk of Mortality measures must be clearly distinguished and are 'two scales of different concepts' rather than 'two sides of the same coin'. However, this is more evident for some APR-DRGs than for others.

Cost analysis of radical resection of malignant breast tumors under the China Healthcare Security Diagnosis Related Groups payment system.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in women worldwide and poses a severe threat to their health. Therefore, this study examined patients who underwent breast cancer surgery, analyzed hospitalization costs and structure, and explored the impact of China Healthcare Security Diagnosis Related Groups (CHS-DRG) management on patient costs. It aimed to provide medical institutions with ways to reduce costs, optimize cost structures, reduce patient burden, and improve service efficiency. AIM: To study the CHS-DRG payment system's impact on breast cancer surgery costs. METHODS: Using the CHS-DRG (version 1.1) grouping criteria, 4073 patients, who underwent the radical resection of breast malignant tumors from January to December 2023, were included in the JA29 group; 1028 patients were part of the CHS-DRG payment system, unlike the rest. Through an independent sample t-test, the length of hospital stay as well as total hospitalization, medicine and consumables, medical, nursing, medical technology, and management expenses were compared. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to test the cost correlation. RESULTS: In terms of hospitalization expenses, patients in the CHS-DRG payment group had lower medical, nursing, and management expenses than those in the diagnosis-related group (DRG) non-payment group. For patients in the DRG payment group, the factors affecting the total hospitalization cost, in descending order of relevance, were medicine and consumable costs, consumable costs, medicine costs, medical costs, medical technology costs, management costs, nursing costs, and length of hospital stay. For patients in the DRG non-payment group, the factors affecting the total hospitalization expenses in descending order of relevance were medicines and consumable expenses, consumable expenses, medical technology expenses, the cost of medicines, medical expenses, nursing expenses, length of hospital stay, and management expenses. CONCLUSION: The CHS-DRG system can help control and reduce unnecessary medical expenses by controlling medicine costs, medical consumable costs, and the length of hospital stay while ensuring medical safety.

Drug utilization reviews to reduce inappropriate drug use and pharmaceutical costs in inpatients based on diagnosis-related group data.

BACKGROUND: Irrational pharmacotherapy and increasing pharmacy costs remain major concerns in healthcare systems. Pharmacists are expected to employ diagnosis-related group (DRG) data to analyse inpatient pharmacy utilization. OBJECTIVE: This project aimed to pilot an efficient pharmacist-led programme to analyse factors related to pharmacy expenses, evaluate the rational use of drugs in batch processing, and make further interventions based on DRG data. METHODS: Patients from the OB25 (caesarean section without comorbidities or complications) DRG were selected in 2018, and the most relevant factors were identified through statistical analysis. Interventions were implemented by sending monthly reports on prescribing data and drug review results for the same DRGs to the department starting in 2019. Pre-post comparisons were conducted to demonstrate changes in pharmacy costs and appropriateness at a tertiary teaching hospital with 2,300 beds in China. RESULTS: A total of 1,110 patients were identified from the OB25 DRG data in 2018. Multivariate linear analysis indicated that the number of items prescribed and wards substantially influenced pharmacy expenditure. Drugs labelled as vital, essential, and non-essential revealed that 46.6% of total pharmacy costs were spent on non-essential drugs, whereas 38.7% were spent on vital drugs. The use of inappropriate pharmaceuticals and drug items was substantially reduced, and the average pharmacy cost after intervention was 336.7 RMB in 2020. The benefit-cost ratio of the programme was 9.86. CONCLUSION: Interventions based on DRG data are highly efficient and feasible for reducing inpatient pharmacy costs and non-essential drug use.

Surgical treatment of liver cancer and pancreatic cancer under the China Healthcare Security Diagnosis Related Groups payment system.

BACKGROUND: Data from the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer reported that China had the highest prevalence of cancer and cancer deaths in 2022. Liver and pancreatic cancers accounted for the highest number of new cases. Real-world data (RWD) is now widely preferred to traditional clinical trials in various fields of medicine and healthcare, as the traditional research approach often involves highly selected populations and interventions and controls that are strictly regulated. Additionally, research results from the RWD match global reality better than those from traditional clinical trials. AIM: To analyze the cost disparity between surgical treatments for liver and pancreatic cancer under various factors. METHODS: This study analyzed RWD 1137 cases within the HB1 group (patients who underwent pancreatectomy, hepatectomy, and/or shunt surgery) in 2023. It distinguished different expenditure categories, including medical, nursing, technical, management, drug, and consumable costs. Additionally, it assessed the contribution of each expenditure category to total hospital costs and performed cross-group comparisons using the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test. This study used the Steel-Dwass test for post-hoc multiple comparisons and the Spearman correlation coefficient to examine the relationships between variables. RESULTS: The study found that in HB11 and HB13, the total hospitalization costs were significantly higher for pancreaticoduodenectomy than for pancreatectomy and hepatectomy. Although no significant difference was observed in the length of hospital stay between patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and pancreatectomy, both were significantly longer than those who underwent liver resection. In HB15, no significant difference was observed in the total cost of hospitalization between pancreaticoduodenectomy and pancreatectomy; however, both were significantly higher than those in hepatectomy. Additionally, the length of hospital stay was significantly longer for patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy than for those who underwent pancreatectomy or liver resection. CONCLUSION: China Healthcare Security Diagnosis Related Groups payment system positively impacts liver and pancreatic cancer surgeries by improving medical quality and controlling costs. Further research could refine this grouping system and ensure continuous effectiveness and sustainability.

Incremental Societal Costs of Perioperative Complications Following Adult Elective Inpatient Major Therapeutic Surgery in the State of Florida: A Seven-Year Retrospective Epidemiological Analysis.

Introduction There is an expanding role for anesthesiologists in the preoperative optimization and postoperative management of patients, often in the context of a so-called perioperative surgical home. Such efforts typically include enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols and often an anesthesiologist-led team for perioperative management. Studies of the cost-effectiveness of such approaches have generally been conducted at single institutions, with most patients cared for by small numbers of surgeons. This limitation creates generalizability issues as to whether improvement was related mostly to organizational culture or the studied surgeons' practices (non-generalizable) versus the procedures (generalizable). We studied whether other organizations can rely on achieving similar benefits following the adoption of a studied process improvement strategy at a single institution. Methods All patients undergoing elective major therapeutic inpatient surgery discharged between October 2015 and June 2022 at non-federal hospitals in the state of Florida were included. For each discharge, the United States Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Group (MS-DRG) weighting factor (i.e., the multiplier for the hospital's base rate for admissions that determines reimbursement) and the Clinical Classification Software Refined (CCSR) code for the principal procedure were determined at admission and discharge from the state's inpatient healthcare database based on the diagnoses present at those time points. An increase in the weighting factor from admission to discharge represents societal costs from perioperative complications. Statewide, by hospital, and by surgeon, we calculated the total increase for each CCSR's weighting factor. Our primary hypothesis was that surgeon variability would be statistically greater than CCSR variability but that the incremental effect would be <5%. If CCSR and surgeon variability were comparable, this would be supportive of generalizability. In contrast, if there were a predominant effect related to the surgeon, results from one institution might not be applicable to others. Results Among the 1,482,344 discharges studied, the pooled (N=7 years) contributions to MS-DRG weighting factor increases from the upper 20% of surgeons were 2.8% more than from the upper 20% of CCSRs (95% CI 1.9%-3.9%, p=0.0006). Those CCSRs accounted for 85.5% (95% CI 79.4%-91.7%, p<0.0001) of the total increase in the MS-DRG weighting factor. The average contribution of the top two surgeons at each hospital to that hospital's increase in the weighting factor ranged among CCSRs from 68% to 97%. The median and 75th percentile of surgeons performing at least 10% of the total number of cases at each hospital was similar to those values for the contributions to the increases in the MS-DRG weighting factor, median 2.0 to 3.0, and 75th percentile 1.75 to 4.0. Conclusions Because variability among surgeons in their contributions to increases in the MS-DRG weighting factor only slightly exceeded the variability among CCSR surgical categories, perioperative surgical home and ERAS study research results involving single institutions and a small number of surgeons would likely be generalizable to other hospitals and healthcare systems. Funding agencies should not be hesitant to fund single-center perioperative surgical home studies and ERAS interventions based on concerns related to lack of generalizability.

Alcohol-Specific Inpatient Diagnoses in Germany: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Analysis of Primary and Secondary Diagnoses from 2012 to 2021.

AIMS: Our study aimed to a) describe the distribution of hospital discharges with primary and secondary alcohol-specific diagnoses by sex and age group, and b) describe how the number of hospital discharges with primary and secondary alcohol-specific diagnoses have changed across different diagnostic groups (categorized by primary International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision [ICD-10] diagnosis) over time. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: German hospital settings between 2012 and 2021. PARTICIPANTS: All persons aged 15-69 admitted to hospitals as registered in a nationwide data set. MEASUREMENTS: We counted a) the number of all hospital discharges and b) the number of hospital discharges with at least one alcohol-specific secondary diagnosis (secondary alcohol-specific diagnosis) by year, sex, age group, and diagnostic group. One diagnostic group included all primary alcohol-specific diagnoses, while 13 additional groups aligned with ICD-10 chapters (e.g., neoplasms). Alcohol-involvement was defined as either a primary or secondary alcohol-specific diagnosis. FINDINGS: Of 95 417 204 recorded hospital discharges between 2012 and 2021, 3 828 917 discharges (4.0%; 2 913 903 men (6.4%); 915 014 women (1.8%)) involved either a primary or at least one secondary diagnosis related to alcohol. Of all alcohol-involved hospital discharges, 56.8% (1 654 736 discharges) had no primary but only a secondary alcohol-specific diagnosis. Secondary alcohol-specific diagnoses were particularly prevalent in hospital discharges due to injuries. With rising age, alcohol-involvement in hospital discharges due to digestive or cardiovascular diseases increased. Between 2012 and 2021, the rate of alcohol-involved hospital discharges has decreased more in younger as compared with older adults (average change between 2012 and 2021: 15-24: -55%; 25-34: -41%; 35-44: -23%; 45-54: -31%; 55-64: -21%; 65-69: -8%). CONCLUSIONS: The number of alcohol-involved hospital discharges in Germany from 2012 to 2021 more than doubles (from 1 654 736 to 3 828 917) when including secondary alcohol-specific diagnoses. More pronounced declines among younger adults may be attributed to unequal changes in alcohol consumption patterns across the population and to the hazardous effects of long-term alcohol use.

Retrospective analysis of hospitalization costs using two payment systems: the diagnosis related groups (DRG) and the Queralt system, a newly developed case-mix tool for hospitalized patients.

BACKGROUND: Hospital services are typically reimbursed using case-mix tools that group patients according to diagnoses and procedures. We recently developed a case-mix tool (i.e., the Queralt system) aimed at supporting clinicians in patient management. In this study, we compared the performance of a broadly used tool (i.e., the APR-DRG) with the Queralt system. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all admissions occurred in any of the eight hospitals of the Catalan Institute of Health (i.e., approximately, 30% of all hospitalizations in Catalonia) during 2019. Costs were retrieved from a full cost accounting. Electronic health records were used to calculate the APR-DRG group and the Queralt index, and its different sub-indices for diagnoses (main diagnosis, comorbidities on admission, andcomplications occurred during hospital stay) and procedures (main and secondary procedures). The primary objective was the predictive capacity of the tools; we also investigated efficiency and within-group homogeneity. RESULTS: The analysis included 166,837 hospitalization episodes, with a mean cost of € 4,935 (median 2,616; interquartile range 1,011-5,543). The components of the Queralt system had higher efficiency (i.e., the percentage of costs and hospitalizations covered by increasing percentages of groups from each case-mix tool) and lower heterogeneity. The logistic model for predicting costs at pre-stablished thresholds (i.e., 80th, 90th, and 95th percentiles) showed better performance for the Queralt system, particularly when combining diagnoses and procedures (DP): the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for the 80th, 90th, 95th cost percentiles were 0.904, 0.882, and 0.863 for the APR-DRG, and 0.958, 0.945, and 0.928 for the Queralt DP; the corresponding values of area under the precision-recall curve were 0.522, 0.604, and 0.699 for the APR-DRG, and 0.748, 0.7966, and 0.834 for the Queralt DP. Likewise, the linear model for predicting the actual cost fitted better in the case of the Queralt system. CONCLUSIONS: The Queralt system, originally developed to predict hospital outcomes, has good performance and efficiency for predicting hospitalization costs.

A study of pharmacists-joint total parenteral nutrition in haematopoietic cell transplantation in accord with diagnosis related groups: A retrospective clinical research.

Background: Within Diagnosis Related Groups, based on service capability, efficiency, and quality safety assessment, clinical pharmacists contribute to promoting rational drug utilisation in healthcare institutions. However, a deficiency of pharmacist involvement has been observed in the total parenteral nutrition support to patients following haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) within DRGs. Methods: This study involved 146 patients who underwent HCT at the Department of Haematology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, spanning from January 2020 to December 2022. Results: Patients were allocated equally, with 73 in the control group and 73 in the pharmacist-involved group: baseline characteristics showed no statistics significance, including age, body mass index, nutrition risk screening-2002 score, liver and kidney function, etc. Albumin levels, prealbumin levels were significantly improved after a 7-day TPN support (34.92 ± 4.24 vs 36.25 ± 3.65, P = 0.044; 251.30 ± 95.72 vs 284.73 ± 83.15, P = 0.026). The body weight was increased after a 7-day support and before discharge (58.77 ± 12.47 vs 63.82 ± 11.70, P = 0.013; 57.61 ± 11.85 vs 64.92 ± 11.71, P < 0.001). The length of hospital stay, costs and the rate of re-admissions were significantly shortened (51.10 ± 1.42 vs 46.41 ± 1.86, P = 0.048; 360,162.67 ± 91,831.34 vs 324,070.16 ± 112,315.51, P = 0.035; 61.64% vs 43.84%, P = 0.046). Conclusions: Pharmacist-joint TPN support enhances the service efficiency score of medical units, ensuring the fulfilment of orders and rational medication.

[Cost comparison of conservative vs. surgical treatment of chronic lymphedema]. / Kostenvergleich der konservativen vs. operativen Therapie des chronischen Lymphödems.

BACKGROUND: Lymphedema is primarily treated conservatively using complex physical decongestion treatment (CDT). Lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA), vascularized lymph node transplantation (VLNT) and liposuction are available as surgical treatment methods; however, reimbursement in the diagnosis-related groups (DRG) system is sometimes inadequate or only possible following an individual application. The costs of these relatively new surgical procedures have not yet been set in relation to those of CDT. METHOD: The costs of conservative treatment were determined in accordance with the guidelines. The costs for LVA, VLNT and liposuction of the upper and lower extremities were estimated on the basis of the DRG reimbursement per case and the expected reduction in conservative measures according to current knowledge. The annual treatment costs were then compared. RESULTS: The annual treatment costs of LVA and VLNT are already lower than conservative treatment alone in the second postoperative year. Liposuction reaches this point in the 6th (upper extremity) or 47th postoperative year (lower extremity). CONCLUSION: The evidence for the positive effects of lymphatic surgery is still limited; however, it is recognizable that the curative surgical approach can significantly reduce the treatment costs and improve the quality of life of lymphedema patients; however, there is a lack of adequate reflection of the surgical effort in the reimbursement.

Based on knowledge capital value for disease cost accounting of diagnosis related groups.

Background: The National Health Commission and the other relevant departments in China have initiated testing of the Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) system in 30 pilot locations since 2019. In the process of DRG payment reform, accounting for the costs of diseases has become a highly challenging issue. The traditional method of disease accounting method overlooks the compensation for the knowledge capital value of medical personnel. Objective: The primary objective of this study is to analyze the cost accounting scheme of China's Diagnosis Related Groups (C-DRG), focusing on the value of knowledge capital. Methods: The study initially proposes a measurement index system for the value of knowledge-based capital, including the difficulty of disease treatment, labor intensity of disease treatment, risk of disease treatment, and operation/treatment time for diseases. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is then utilized to weigh the features of medical workers' knowledge capital value. First, pairwise comparisons are conducted in this stage to develop a two-pair judgment matrix of the primary indicators. Second, the eigenvectors corresponding to the maximum eigenvalues of the matrix are calculated to generate the weight coefficient of each feature. The consistency test is carried out after this stage. An empirical analysis is conducted by collecting data, including the full costs of treating three types of diseases-hip replacement, acute simple appendicitis, and heart bypass surgery-from one public medical institution. Results: The empirical analysis examines whether this DRG costing accounting can address the issue of neglecting the value of medical workers' knowledge capital. The methods reconfigure the positive incentive mechanism, stimulate the endogenous motivation of the medical service system, foster independent changes in medical behavior, and achieve the goals of reasonable cost control. Conclusion: In the cost accounting system of C-DRG, the value of medical workers' knowledge capital is acknowledged. This acknowledgment not only boosts the enthusiasm and creativity of medical workers in optimizing and standardizing the diagnosis and treatment process but also improves the transparency and authenticity of DRG pricing. This is particularly evident in the optimization and standardization of the diagnosis and treatment processes within medical institutions and in monitoring inadequate medical practices within these institutions.

Impacts of DRG-Based Prepayment Reform on the Cost and Quality of Patients with Neurologic Disorders: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Analysis in Beijing, China.

Purpose: As one of the pioneering pilot cities in China's extensive Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) -based prepayment reform, Beijing is leading a comprehensive overhaul of the prepayment system, encompassing hospitals of varying affiliations and tiers. This systematic transformation is rooted in extensive patient group data, with the commencement of actual payments on March 15, 2022. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of DRG payment reform by examining how it affects the cost, volume, and utilization of care for patients with neurological disorders. Patients and Methods: Utilizing the exogenous shock resulting from the implementation of the DRG-based prepayment system, we adopted the Difference-in-Differences (DID) approach to discern changes in outcome variables among DRG payment cases, in comparison to control cases, both before and following the enactment of the DRG policy. The analytical dataset was derived from patients diagnosed with neurological disorders across all hospitals in Beijing that underwent the DRG-based prepayment reform. Strict data inclusion and exclusion criteria, including reasonableness tests, were applied, defining the pre-reform timeframe as March 15th through October 31st, 2021, and the post-reform timeframe as the corresponding period in 2022. The extensive dataset encompassed 53 hospitals and encompassed hundreds of thousands of cases. Results: The implementation of DRG-based prepayment resulted in a substantial 12.6% decrease in total costs per case and a reduction of 0.96 days in length of stay. Additionally, the reform was correlated with significant reductions in overall in-hospital mortality and readmission rates. Surprisingly, the study unearthed unintended consequences, including a significant reduction in the proportion of inpatient cases classified as surgical patients and the Case Mix Index (CMI), indicating potential strategic adjustments by providers in response to the introduction of DRG payments. Conclusion: The DRG payment reform demonstrates substantial effects in restraining cost escalation and enhancing quality. Nevertheless, caution must be exercised to mitigate potential issues such as patient selection bias and upcoding.

How does diagnosis-related group payment impact the health care received by rural residents? Lessons learned from China.

OBJECTIVES: There is growing evidence that differences exist between rural and urban residents in terms of health, access to care and the quality of health care received, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). To improve health equity and the performance of health systems, a diagnosis-related group (DRG) payment system has been introduced in many LMICs to reduce financial risk and improve the quality of health care. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of DRG payments on the health care received by rural residents in China, and to help policymakers identify and design implementation strategies for DRG payment systems for rural residents in LMICs. STUDY DESIGN: Health impact assessment. METHODS: This study compared the impact of DRG payments on the healthcare received by rural residents in China between the pre- and post-reform periods by applying a difference-in-difference (DID) methodology. The study population included individuals with three common conditions; namely, cerebral infarction, transient ischaemic attack (TIA), and vertebrobasilar insufficiency (VBI). Data on patient medical insurance type were assessed, and those who did not have rural insurance were excluded. RESULTS: This study included 13,088 patients. In total, 33.63% were from Guangdong (n = 4401), 38.21% were from Shandong (n = 5002), and 28.16% were from Guangxi (n = 3685). The DID results showed that the implementation of DRGs was positively associated with hospitalization expense (ß4 = 0.265, P = 0.000), treatment expense (ß4 = 0.343, P = 0.002), drug expense (ß4 = 0.607, P = 0.000), the spending of medical insurance funds (ß4 = 0.711, P = 0.000) and out-of-pocket costs (ß4 = 0.164, P = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that the implementation of DRG payments increases health care costs and the financial burden on health systems and rural patients in LMICs. This is contrary to the original intention of implementing the DRG payment system.

The role of human capital and stress for cost awareness in the healthcare system: a survey among German hospital physicians.

BACKGROUND: Germany has the highest per capita health care spending among EU member states, but its hospitals face pressure to generate profits independently due to the government's withdrawal of investment cost coverage. The diagnosis related groups (DRG) payment system was implemented to address the cost issue, challenging hospital physicians to provide services within predefined prices and an economic target corridor to reduce costs. This study examines the extent of cost awareness among medical personnel in German hospitals and its influencing factors. METHODS: We developed an online survey in which participants across all specialties in hospitals estimated the prices in euros of four common interventions and answered questions about their human capital and perceived stress on the workplace. As a measure of cost awareness, we used the probability of estimating the prices correctly within a reasonable margin. We employed logit logistic regression estimators to identify influencing factors in a sample of 86 participants. RESULTS: The results revealed that most of the respondents were unaware of the costs of common interventions. General human capital, acquired through prior education, and job-specific human capital had no influence on cost awareness, whereas domain-specific human capital, that is, gaining economic knowledge based on self-interest, had a positive nonlinear effect on cost awareness. Furthermore, an increased stress level negatively influenced cost awareness. CONCLUSIONS: This paper is the first of its kind for the German health care sector that contributes responses to the question whether health care professionals in German hospitals have cost awareness and if not, what reasons lie behind this lack of knowledge. Our findings show that the cost awareness desired by the introduction of the DRG system has yet to be achieved by medical personnel.

Optimization of Diagnosis-Related Groups for 14,246 Patients with Uterine Leiomyoma in a Single Center in Western China Using a Machine Learning Model.

Background: Uterine leiomyoma (UL) is one of the most common benign tumors in women, and its incidence is gradually increasing in China. The clinical complications of UL have a negative impact on women's health, and the cost of treatment poses a significant burden on patients. Diagnosis-related groups (DRG) are internationally recognized as advanced healthcare payment management methods that can effectively reduce costs. However, there are variations in the design and grouping rules of DRG policies across different regions. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the factors influencing the hospitalization costs of patients with UL and optimize the design of DRG grouping schemes to provide insights for the development of localized DRG grouping policies. Methods: The Mann-Whitney U-test or the Kruskal-Wallis H-test was employed for univariate analysis, and multiple stepwise linear regression analysis was utilized to identify the primary influencing factors of hospitalization costs for UL. Case combination classification was conducted using the exhaustive chi-square automatic interactive detection (E-CHAID) algorithm within a decision tree framework. Results: Age, occupation, number of hospitalizations, type of medical insurance, Transfer to other departments, length of stay (LOS), type of UL, admission condition, comorbidities and complications, type of primary procedure, other types of surgical procedures, and discharge method had a significant impact on hospitalization costs (P<0.05). Among them, the type of primary procedure, other types of surgical procedures, and LOS were the main factors influencing hospitalization costs. By incorporating the type of primary procedure, other types of surgical procedures, and LOS into the decision tree model, patients were divided into 11 DRG combinations. Conclusion: Hospitalization costs for UL are mainly related to the type of primary procedure, other types of surgical procedures, and LOS. The DRG case combinations of UL based on E-CHAID algorithm are scientific and reasonable.

Requesting That Delirium Achieve Parity With Acute Encephalopathy in the MS-DRG System.

Since 2007, the Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Groups classification system has favored billing codes for acute encephalopathy over delirium codes in determining hospital reimbursement and several quality-of-care value metrics, despite broad overlap between these sets of diagnostic codes. Toxic and metabolic encephalopathy codes are designated as major complication or comorbidity, whereas causally specified delirium codes are designated as complication or comorbidity and thus associated with a lower reimbursement and lesser impact on value metrics. The authors led a submission to the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services requesting that causally specified delirium be designated major complication or comorbidity alongside toxic and metabolic encephalopathy. Delirium warrants reclassification because it satisfies U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' guiding principles for re-evaluating Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group severity levels. Delirium: (1) has a bidirectional relationship with the permanent condition of dementia (major neurocognitive disorder per DSM-5-TR), (2) indexes vulnerability across populations, (3) impacts healthcare systems across levels of care, (4) complicates postoperative recovery, (5) consigns patients to higher levels of care, (6) impedes patient engagement in care, (7) has several recent treatment guidelines, (8) often indicates neuronal/brain injury, and (9) represents a common expression of terminal illness. The proposal's impact was explored using the 2019 National Inpatient Sample, which suggested that increasing delirium's complexity designation would lead to an upcoding of less than 1% of eligible discharges. Parity for delirium is essential to enhancing awareness of delirium's clinical and economic costs. Appreciating delirium's impact would encourage delirium prevention and screening efforts, thereby mitigating its dire outcomes for patients, families, and healthcare systems.

Hospital Incidence, Sex Disparities, and Perioperative Mortality in Open Surgically Treated Patients with Aneurysms of the Ascending Aorta and Aortic Arch in Switzerland.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the epidemiological shifts in the incidence of ascending and arch aortic aneurysms (AA) treated with open surgery in the context of evolving endovascular options on a national basis. METHODS: Between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2018, 4388 cases were admitted to the hospital with either ruptured (r)AA or non-ruptured (nr)AA as the primary or secondary diagnosis. Patients were classified as having AA based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: The age-standardized hospital incidence rates for treatment of nrAA were 7.8 (95% confidence interval (CI): 6.9 to 8.7) in 100,000 men and 2.9 (2.4 to 3.4) in 100,000 women and were stable over time. The overall raw in-hospital mortality rate was 2.0% and was significantly lower in males compared to women (1.6% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.015). Higher van Walraven scores (OR: 1.08 per point; 95%CI: 1.06 to 1.11; p = 0.001) and higher age (OR 1.05 per year; (95%CI: 1.02 to 1.07, p = 0.045) were significantly associated with hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular surgery seems to have no influence on hospital incidence in patients treated with conventional surgery for AA in Switzerland. There was a significant reduction in in-hospital mortality in both men and women, with age and the von Walraven score being independent factors for worse outcomes.

Comparison of diagnosis-related groups (DRG)-based hospital payment system design and implementation strategies in different countries: The case of ischemic stroke.

Diagnosis-related groups (DRG) based hospital payment systems are gradually becoming the main mechanism for reimbursement of acute inpatient care. We reviewed the existing literature to ascertain the global use of DRG-based hospital payment systems, compared the similarities and differences of original DRG versions in ten countries, and used ischemic stroke as an example to ascertain the design and implementation strategies for various DRG systems. The current challenges with and direction for the development of DRG-based hospital payment systems are also analyzed. We found that the DRG systems vary greatly in countries in terms of their purpose, grouping, coding, and payment mechanisms although based on the same classification concept and that they have tended to develop differently in countries with different income classifications. In high-income countries, DRG-based hospital payment systems have gradually begun to weaken as a mainstream payment method, while in middle-income countries DRG-based hospital payment systems have attracted increasing attention and increased use. The example of ischemic stroke provides suggestions for mutual promotion of DRG-based hospital payment systems and disease management. How to determine the level of DRG payment incentives and improve system flexibility, balance payment goals and disease management goals, and integrate development with other payment methods are areas for future research on DRG-based hospital payment systems.

The end of an era? Activity-based funding based on diagnosis-related groups: A review of payment reforms in the inpatient sector in 10 high-income countries.

CONTEXT: Across the member countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, policy makers are searching for new ways to pay hospitals for inpatient care to move from volume to value. This paper offers an overview of the latest reforms and their evidence to date. METHODS: We reviewed reforms to DRG payment systems in 10 high-income countries: Australia, Austria, Canada (Ontario), Denmark, France, Germany, Norway, Poland, the United Kingdom (England), and the United States. FINDINGS: We identified four reform trends among the observed countries, them being (1) reductions in the overall share of inpatient payments based on DRGs, (2) add-on payments for rural hospitals or their exclusion from the DRG system, (3) episode-based payments, which use one joint price to pay providers for all services delivered along a patient pathway, and (4) financial incentives to shift the delivery of care to less costly settings. Some countries have combined some or all of these measures with financial adjustments for quality of care. These reforms demonstrate a shift away from activity and efficiency towards a diversified set of targets, and mirror efforts to slow the rise in health expenditures while improving quality of care. Where evaluations are available, the evidence indicates mixed success in improving quality of care and reducing costs and expenditures.

How do hospitals respond to payment unbundling for diagnostic imaging of suspected cancer patients?

Payments for some diagnostic scans undertaken in outpatient settings were unbundled from Diagnosis Related Group based payments in England in April 2013 to address under-provision. Unbundled scans attracted additional payments of between £45 and £748 directly following the reform. We examined the effect on utilization of these scans for patients with suspected cancer. We also explored whether any detected effects represented real increases in use of scans or better coding of activity. We applied difference-in-differences regression to patient-level data from Hospital Episodes Statistics for 180 NHS hospital Trusts in England, between April 2010 and March 2018. We also explored heterogeneity in recorded use of scans before and after the unbundling at hospital Trust-level. Use of scans increased by 0.137 scans per patient following unbundling, a 134% relative increase. This increased annual national provider payments by £79.2 million. Over 15% of scans recorded after the unbundling were at providers that previously recorded no scans, suggesting some of the observed increase in activity reflected previous under-coding. Hospitals recorded substantial increases in diagnostic imaging for suspected cancer in response to payment unbundling. Results suggest that the reform also encouraged improvements in recording, so the real increase in testing is likely lower than detected.

Impacts of a new diagnosis-related group point payment system on children's medical services in China: Length of stay and costs.

BACKGROUND: Paediatric healthcare is always highlighted in medical and health care system reform in China. Zhejiang Province established a new diagnosis-related group (DRG) point payment reform in 2020 to regulate provider behaviours and control medical costs. We conducted this study to evaluate impacts of the DRG point payment policy on provider behaviours and resource usage in children's medical services. METHODS: Data from patients' discharge records from July 2019 to December 2020 in Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine were collected for analysis. We employed the interrupted time series approach to reveal the trend before and after the DRG point payment reform and the difference-in-differences analysis to estimate the independent outcome changes attributed to the reform. RESULTS: We found that the upward trend of length of stay slightly slowed, and the total costs began to decrease at the post-policy stage. Although independent effects of the reform were not presented among the whole sample, the length of stay and hospitalisation costs of moderate-hospital-stay paediatric patients, non-surgical patients, and infant patients were found to decrease rapidly after the reform. CONCLUSION: DRG point payments can changed the provider behaviours and eventually reduce healthcare resource usage in children's medical services.